Did you install the Exchange Admin with the same SP on the backup systems?
Scott
-Original Message-
From: ml.exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 09, 2003 3:22 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Backup Exec 9.0 and 9.1 does not see Exchange 2003 Stores?
We are
Yes, but I would recommend adding a second drive to your current box if
possible instead. Routing to a different drive across the network will at
minimum double the time it takes to run this.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Guy Fortin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December
3 levels here also.
I match the below configuration except we have the e500, GroupShield 5, and
Enterprise 7 on the desktops, all managed with EPO.
-Original Message-
From: John Orban [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 6:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
I would suspect the system is replaying the queue.dat file found in the imcdata
folder. I would hazard a guess that all the messages being replayed if you
will are all SMTP. Stop the Internet mail service then rename/move/delete the
queue.dat file and then restart the service. This should
There is also a HOTFIX 2 for this version and also a new set of drivers out
there. You might try the Hotfix.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Bill Kuhl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2003 8:18 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Veritas 9.0 Remote Agent Stopping
Well I am not a legal speagle by any means, but the disclaimer issue it bad
joke. The true responsibility of who the message went to is in the hands of
the sender. If the message was addressed correctly then the need for
disclaimers would be a non-issue.
Sorry I watched this thread long enough
Well I am not a legal speagle by any means, but the disclaimer issue it bad
joke. The true responsibility of who the message went to is in the hands of
the sender. If the message was addressed correctly then the need for
disclaimers would be a non-issue.
Sorry I watched this thread long enough
You want a separate TREE in the forest, not a child domain.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:54 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange and AD Question
This question may be a little off the list subject but you guys
-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange and AD Question
You want a separate TREE in the forest, not a child domain.
-Original Message-
From: Ray Beckwith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday
the mistakes which can be made in a very
narrow field.
--Niels Bohr
An expert is someone who knows some of the worst mistakes that can be made in
his subject, and how to avoid them.
--Werner Karl Heisenberg
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott
Not only that, but since lots of us asked to be on the mailing list of
Sunbelt.com it's not spam because we opted to have them send us that kind of
stuff.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Durkee, Peter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 1:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
I prefer to not let them hit my mails systems and so I prefer the SMTP products
that I can load on a stand alone box. This way I can filter out as much
garbage prior to hitting the mailboxes as possible so it is not filling up my
IS.
Products like Trend's ScanMail or MailEssentials
: RE: SPAM blocking software recommendations.
Yea but you can't beat the price of Spamnet. As far as taking up space,
I just have the folder emptied on exiting from outlook.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Akerlund, Scott
Sent: Tuesday
That would be nice, but as I recall you have to create these yourself.
-Original Message-
From: Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 8:21 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Nt 4.0 dns
Should not NT 4.0 dns upon first creation..create ptr's and reverse dns
It was published under Q297921 from what I am finding.
Provided this was the problem as I am missing that part of this thread.
While you are running Setup or Setup /forestprep to join an existing Microsoft
Exchange Server 5.5 organization, you may experience the following behavior on
the Service
Currently sitting at 70gb with 2269 users. Single box with EX 5.5 SP 4 running
in W2K Sp3. Backed up with a Qualstar 4222 Tape Library with 2 AIT (50/100)
drives and 20 tapes. Automated on Backup Exec v8.6
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
A nickels worth from the peanut gallery.
I have found that a phone number analogy works quite well with the
Non-Technical. They can associate with a wrong number, and number not in
service, and circuit overloads (all phones lines busy), it's a picture they
understand quite well. Plus it is very
You need the correct DNS name here. If you don't do this part of the setup
right, you users will receive a certificate error popup, saying the name does
not match the certificate. Up to you, though most people like to see it with
all 3 nice green check marks or not at all.
Scott
-Original
I have seen many fax solutions come and ago, most will do the job. The issue
for most companies comes down to cost.
Faxination is pretty decent in that you license by the user. If you have a
small base of people who need to send faxes then this is a good route to go.
If you have a large base
I would probably be looking for a ORB or RBL that is likely involved some where
along the way.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Fennema [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 20, 2002 11:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: E-mail in to China
I was wondering if anyone
Setup a DL with no one in it. Assign it the SMTP addresses for the people who
are no longer with you. End of story. :o)
-Original Message-
From: Doug Kassay [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 09, 2002 9:37 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Retired Exchange 5.5
I think the important thing to note here is that you really not do this sort of
action unless you are talking with MS PSS and are doing so at the Techs
instructions with an open incident. This is something you should not be doing
out on your own. And if you are, you better make sure your
If you have a PIX (Cisco) firewall this would be in the Mail Conduit make
sure they have it configured properly.
-Original Message-
From: Greg Deckler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Most of us create either a dummy mailbox or Public Folder. Then assign the
addresses in question to said mailbox or pf and set it to auto delete into
never never land.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:kwenger;centershift.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 13, 2002 9:53
You hit the nail on the head on this answer. I would like to add one more word
to it. Control
If it is in-house you have (at least perceptional) better or more control
over what is happening with what has become a critical business application.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Roger
The steps are pretty straight forward here.
1. Backup (make sure you back is good). Insert disk and run the upgrade, will
not mess up current system. Well the proverbial should not, which is of course
why you have the first part. Have a good backup.
2. Flush (you have that answer already)
3.
Unless you have modified the default settings on the calendar, this is not
possible in the first place. The default permission settings for each users
calendar is for, Default No access.
So unless privileges have been granted by user a or for user a, User B cannot
place an item on User A's
It's nice to see that name again here.
Hi there Ed! :o)
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Test
Because it is there.
Ed Crowley
hp Services
--- Dean Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In today's world when it comes to this stuff, your only way to look at this is
LEGAL. Check with your legal department and see what they want done, of course
you may need to educate them first.
After that your scheme be easy to deploy, but not necessarily easy to live
with. :o)
Scott
Not to mention several known viral exploits for you to spread and wreak havoc
among your systems by using Word as the E-Mail editor.
The more complex they make the plumbing the easier it is to plug them up or
something the affect. Borrowed from Scotty of the Star Ship Enterprise.
Scott
Yikes I'm with Missy on this one. I have been doing exchange since it was a
fledgling beta called 4.0 I have never had any reason to do an ExMerge on a
production box.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 11, 2002 3:27 PM
To:
5:15pm: Break in because problem account crashed IS when it tried to move it.
5:04pm: You do the above because you remember the key is locked inside. hehe
Don't get me wrong I love the ECMSM works great, and is less filling. However;
I did have several accounts that did the above last time I
The Knowledge Base articles can be found at the following links:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q317173
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q317172
-Original Message-
From: RB [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:22 PM
attaching the NAS to Exchange via
fiber) - no matter what your vendor says, it's not the same as SCSI or
SAN.
I would be very careful if you are thinking of doing this.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Akerlund, Scott [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 5:25 PM
To: Exchange
Have you installed the Exchange administrator and SP on the system doing the
backups?
A poorly documented gottcha.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Chenault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 3:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: BE 8.6
I have to admit I'm
Have you checked to make sure this user has Logon Locally privileges to the
machine running OWA? Sounds like a security issue on these few users.
-Original Message-
From: Wynkoop, John [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, March 26, 2002 8:19 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
They will disconnected until they close out of Outlook and re-open. Or so the
experience has been here when I had to do that. In a few cases the user never
even knew it happened if they were away from their desk long enough.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Chris Haaker [mailto:[EMAIL
Yes
Yes
You could do that too.
-Original Message-
From: Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, March 22, 2002 7:03 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange with 2 domains
Would it be possible for my organization to use 1 Exchange server for 2
domains? If so would they be
Fair...
Turn off circular logging, put the mail from the users pst's back in the
information store as that is why it exists, turn on the deleted recovery
dumpster for at least 10 days, and lastly I wish you the best with Arcserve for
backups.
Have a great weekend.
I am going home now. :o)
Now there is a loaded question. The answer truly is it depends.
The message is (to my understanding) not really deleted and hence gone until
ALL pointers to that message in the IS are deleted. If the message exists in
one inbox, outbox, sent items or folder stored on the mail system then
I would like to add some additional evidence to this post. At first look I
would say that this persons (account) does not exist at this system. However;
I have this exact same problem with accounts I know to exist, in fact if I
bring up my MSN account and send to the identical address it works,
::laughing::
That is all well and good, except I have to convince you to put an MX on your
system. And you telling me it works fine for everyone else. So No!, I'm not
going to change it.
Did we get anywhere?
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
This all sounds to me like you're getting very close to a Mail Loop disaster.
Been there done that.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Gary Aiston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 04, 2002 1:36 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Autoforwarding Rules.
why not use
I agree pretty much with this layout. I have beaten this horse and still it
rides. I have managed to at least get most of my people to create a pst for
basically each year. Some have gone to more frequent than this, quarterly for
a couple. The reason for this? Large PST's corrupt much
And you're not dead yet? Sheessh
JK
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 08, 2002 9:00 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Sarcasm makes this list great (Not)
I'm fricken hilarious! I kill me sometimes!
D
-Original
Yikes!
You need to read some more before embarking on this cruise ship.
You need to have Active Directory running in your W2K domain, and you will need
to run the Forest Prep for Exchange 2000 before you will get very far.
Best of luck!
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Dean Clark
Well the straight stuff, be careful in here.
On your exchange server go to the winnt\system32\drivers\etc folder.
Edit the services file you will find here.
Find the line for SMTP and change the port designation.
Remember to stop and restart the IMC/IMS
Done
-Original Message-
From:
Yes,
Provide access at the mailbox level or you can't even seen the other folders to
begin with.
Then simply provide the access you need this person to have to only the
Calendar and Task folders.
On persons workstation add the mailbox to their Client.
On the Tools menu go down to Services,
I like to look at it this way, the lesser of two evils.
On the one hand it is more work for me to have to pull items from quarantine.
On the other hand, it is even MORE work for me to rid the entire network of a
virus.
Far better for the users to get a message letting them know something came
Add them to the DL, then Hide them. Works great.
-Original Message-
From: Jesse Rink [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 8:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Custom recipients in a DL?
Scenario:
I would like to setup a Distribution List that contains about
We are here, and EXE, and PIF, and VBS and so on
If they want it, they have to talk to me first. POWER!
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2001 9:05 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: New Virus outbreak
We are
Well you have to look at this in the entire perspective.
Taking the spin on your analogy.
To be honest the car and computer are both useable of the lot, or out of the
box more often than not.
However most people don't drive the car without.
Insurance (incase of accidents)recurring cost
You need to download and setup the Name Resolver utility that is a part of
this. I believe this only works if you are quarantining to the Database option
and not a folder.
-Original Message-
From: Bean, Rick [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 12:57 PM
To: Exchange
Whole lot of presumption going on here.
/presumption on
BackUpExec Current Version 8.6
You bought the Exchange Module to go with it
/presumption off
WAG here, is that you have not loaded the Exchange Administrator on the station
you want to back Exchange up from This is required, it does
1 Exchange Server
5 additional servers connecting to Exchange, 3 fax, 1 SMTP Virus Scanner, 1
VPN/OWA server
2500+ Clients 39GB store.
Also I am
Domain Admin, Backup Admin, IIS Admin (both Inter, Intra), Printers, General
all around Focal point for anything NT related.
Never bored here.
Hum...
Just tested that same setup here, and I get
Can't open previous item.
I also tested it going the other way.
Can't open next item.
Must be something about your setup that is not right some where.
Exchange 5.5 Sp4
W2K Sp2
Outlook 2000.
-Original Message-
From: Black, Nathan
See Q155430 in Technect it appear relevant to your problem.
-Original Message-
From: Bowles, John L. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 8:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Error
No she's not sending an attachment. But if she was mail is
My clients are reporting similar Server Down or Unreachable NDR's coming back
from MSN, Juno, and many others.
I think some servers have just been buried under the load of mail with reports
from Tuesday.
-Original Message-
From: Darryl J Roberts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday,
I suggest looking at something like PGP
www.pgp.com Or some thing else like it, there are several others out there.
-Original Message-
From: Mark Peoples [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 12, 2001 4:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Encryption
What is truly tragic here, is how few, can make so many, hate and fear, so
fast! Please lets not have this group degenerate into hatefulness towards each
other too. We have enough of that before us today, that we need to absorb and
learn to live with.
I weep for those that had their lives
I just finished my Ed Crowley server move method here. From an older dual
Intel 450 and 1gb of RAM to my new razzu quad 700 with 4gb of RAM. It was
taking about 15 to 20 minutes to move a gigabyte give or take a little from the
old system to the new system. Both were on 100MB switched ports.
61 matches
Mail list logo
