IMC partial hangs
Exchange 5.5sp4, IMC not directly reachable from the outside (push/receive to an external smtp gateway). Lately the IMC hanged various times, exactly we seem to: - receive a particular email, a message il logged: A message from [EMAIL PROTECTED] in temporary file C:\EXCHSRVR\imcdata\in\X2QQCAY2 was received from mail.previnet.it with 4 local recipients. - other operations continue to work flawlessly - that message becomes stuck, nothing else is logged regarding to it, the message is not delivered, the X2QQCAY2 (or whatever) files stays. - stopping the service does not succeed, kill of the MSEXCIMC process is needed - by removing that file from imcdata\in restart succeeds - if that file stays in imcdata\in at imc start it will become stuck again. In technet I found lots of articles regarding IMC stops (which it does not), only a few regarding IMC hangs, nothing (apparently) relevant. Only similarity I found yet (by eyeball inspection) between those email are: - about half of them are forwards of emails containing rightfax fax notifications with the images (TIF) attached. Usual mime decoders like decode shell extension do decode the attachments without problems. There are at least two instances where the remote senders were notified of a problem (we did not receiver yet your urgent email), and forwarded the message several times directly or by another mailbox in the same (remote) organization. These emails were stuck, too. - the other half of those messages seem to be reply to all (without attachments) to some our emails where the original messages had a CC to internal recipients without smtp addresses, so those recipients became auto converted in the our outbound email to the form IMCEAEX-_O=org_OU=site_CN=container_CN=alias@our domain and the stuck message was a reply to that address (being a reply to all). That conversion to IMCEAEX won't happen anymore, now every recipient does have a smtp address, the filtering of internal mailboxes without access to internet is done differently, but there are still lots of old emails around people can reply to. I'm now going to filter those IMCEAEX recipients on the gateway box, still the first half of the stuck messages doesn't have these recipients so I don't think that's the real problem (at least not the whole of it). Also, the stuck emails I do have available (earlier ones unfortunately haven't been saved) all have a X-Mailer header Internet Mail Service (5.5.2653.19). Any ideas ? Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent to PF move ?
Hi, I need to move everything arriving in the Sent Items of a particular mailbox to a public folder (EX5.5). A outlook rules wizard rule would be client side only (move to PF), but there could be no client open (those mails actually are sent by cdo agent running in another PF with the priviledge of that particular mailbox), so that's not ok. Another possibility would be (I think, didn't test it yet) another agent running in the Sent Items folder of that mailbox. This should work fine but has the drawback of being async. Any other idea how to do this ? Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
smtp and Send As ?
Scenario: exchange 5.5, smtp connector to the outside. User USER with Send As permission (such as granted from exchange administrator on a domain account) on a object PF (happens to be a PF visible in the GAL). Users sends a mail From: PF. Mail goes outside with correct From: PF headers, but wrong smtp transaction, like MAIL From: USER RCPT To: ... DATA This means any error messages (address unknown...), notifications and so on go back to the USER, not to PF. Is there any way to change this behavior, either globally or for specific items ? Didn't find anything related. Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Need a product to move attachements for the web
Funny thing, it's a while I'm about to code something like that REALLY SOON NOW for internal use. A little bit more complicated since I'll need to traverse some firewalls and use unix based webservers, but basically the idea is exactly the same. Stupid instant poll: how many of you out there have something like that deployed internally ? Doesn't matter if it uses a commercial product or a internal development, I'm just curious how many organizations choose to... ahm... work around the insistence of users using email in order to send ??+MB files by email. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax -Original Message- From: P [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 04, 2003 9:33 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Need a product to move attachements for the web This is what I have in mind: 1) User composes email in email client with attachment 2) Sends to outside organization 3) Email (Exchange) looks at message and compares size of attachments with an administrator defined setting 4) If it is less than the size, just sends on the message normaly 5) If it is greater than or equal to the size it moves the attachment to an IIS location and inserts a link and a passcode into the message (inplace of the attachment) 6) recipient recieves the message and clicks on the link 7) types in the passcode 8) downloads the file Get my drift? Anybody know a product that does this . . . I am sure I am not an original genius who just designed a product . . . . Paul _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Programmatically recover from the Dumpster ?
What I meant is, I know for certain some instances of all those objects had been moved to PSTs, others were still remaining in the db. Moving back everything from PST to pub would restore the initial situation but we'd loose SIS (the moved back objects would count as new ones if I understand it correctly), effectively gaining about 10GB of store. We ended up doing a massive recover form deleted items, one for every directory. Took about half a day and lots of patience :) Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, May 29, 2003 5:13 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Programmatically recover from the Dumpster ? Anything is possible, though not necessarily practical. If you recover, won't it recover back to the original folder structure? Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Herold Heiko Sent: Tuesday, May 27, 2003 11:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Hello, I facing a recover from the dumpster for 1000 folders or a restore to restore server + export to pst + import procedure, which I'd prefer not to do since in that way I'd gain several GB of store size due to lost SIS (I know all of those objects are stil present in other areas of the public database, but recreating the correct structure from those is not possible). Is it possible to restore the items programmatically from the dumpster via outlook objects or cdo or something else ? A quick glance in the documentation didn't reveal anything useful :( Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchanget ext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang =english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Programmatically recover from the Dumpster ?
Hello, I facing a recover from the dumpster for 1000 folders or a restore to restore server + export to pst + import procedure, which I'd prefer not to do since in that way I'd gain several GB of store size due to lost SIS (I know all of those objects are stil present in other areas of the public database, but recreating the correct structure from those is not possible). Is it possible to restore the items programmatically from the dumpster via outlook objects or cdo or something else ? A quick glance in the documentation didn't reveal anything useful :( Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A. www.previnet.it -- Heiko Herold [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- +39-041-5907073 ph -- +39-041-5907472 fax _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Web Interface: http://intm-dl.sparklist.com/cgi-bin/lyris.pl?enter=exchangetext_mode=lang=english To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
programm. read the PF Permission Roles ?
Is there any way to read programmatically the permissions set on public folders on EX5.5/NT4 ? Not the client permissions, those set on the Permissions page from exchange administrator. Directory export doesn't seem to have any working field for that info (at least I tried every field offered by headers.exe and didn't get that info). CDO doesn't seem to have relevant fields. Possibly ADSI ? Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
CDO phone/fax fields problem
Please consider this working prototype of code using CDO. What it does is finding the GAL, find some mailbox, change the phone and fax number. Const CdoPR_TRANSMITABLE_DISPLAY_NAME_A = H3A20001E Const CdoPR_PRIMARY_FAX_NUMBER = H3A23001E Set cdo = CreateObject(MAPI.Session) cdo.Logon , , 0, 0, 0 Set addrlists = cdo.AddressLists For C = 1 To addrlists.Count If addrlists.Item(C).Name = Global Address List Then Set gal = addrlists.Item(C) Exit For End If Next If gal Is Nothing Then MsgBox Gal is nothing Exit Sub Else Set addrentries = gal.AddressEntries Set addrentry = addrentries.GetFirst Do While Not addrentry Is Nothing Set thefields = addrentry.Fields If thefields.Item(CdoPR_TRANSMITABLE_DISPLAY_NAME_A).Value = SomeAccount Then Exit Do End If Set addrentry = addrentries.GetNext Loop thefields.Item(CdoPR_BUSINESS_TELEPHONE_NUMBER).Value = 123 thefields.Item(CdoPR_PRIMARY_FAX_NUMBER).Value = 456 addrentry.Update End If If instead I want to reset those fields (as in delete the content of the field from exchange admin) I thought I'd have to thefields.Item(CdoPR_BUSINESS_TELEPHONE_NUMBER).Delete thefields.Item(CdoPR_PRIMARY_FAX_NUMBER).Delete addrentry.Update This gets me a E_ACCESSDENIED on the .Delete . So I thought possibly those fields can't be deleted (even if some freshly created mailbox won't have them), so I'l reset the content since the type is a Variant/String: thefields.Item(CdoPR_BUSINESS_TELEPHONE_NUMBER).Value = thefields.Item(CdoPR_PRIMARY_FAX_NUMBER).Value = addrentry.Update This one gets me E_ACCESSDENIED at .Update (btw I definitively are using an acconut with rights, I even tried using the service account). Any idea what I'm doing wrong ? What's the correct way to empty those fields ? Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Exchange Database
Why ? Probably I'll have to do a transition to a NAS (Hitachi, reselled by HP) sometime soon, so I'm somewhat interested :) Obviously I will test before moving the production databases, though. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database If you are describing a Network Attached Storage device, step away from the keyboard. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:31 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Moving Exchange Database Subject: Moving Exchange Database I am running exchange 5.5 service pack 4 on NT4 server. We have just acquired an external storage system and a new drive letter is mapped to my exchange server pointing at this new storage system with up to 40g assigned for exchange . I now want to move my exchange database from the current location on drive d: to the new location which is drive E: I intend using the performance optimizer tool, are there any issues involved in moving the database from a local drive on the current server to an external storage system. Thanks __ Do You Yahoo!? Everything you'll ever need on one web page from News and Sport to Email and Music Charts http://uk.my.yahoo.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Exchange Database
Bummer! Thanks! Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database Microsoft Does Not Support Network Attached Storage (NAS) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317173 Microsoft says it will not support the configuration because it can cause corruption in Exchange databases and degrade the performance of the server. http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0618infra.html William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Herold Heiko Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Why ? Probably I'll have to do a transition to a NAS (Hitachi, reselled by HP) sometime soon, so I'm somewhat interested :) Obviously I will test before moving the production databases, though. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database If you are describing a Network Attached Storage device, step away from the keyboard. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:31 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Moving Exchange Database Subject: Moving Exchange Database I am running exchange 5.5 service pack 4 on NT4 server. We have just acquired an external storage system and a new drive letter is mapped to my exchange server pointing at this new storage system with up to 40g assigned for exchange . I now want to move my exchange database from the current location on drive d: to the new location which is drive E: I intend using the performance optimizer tool, are there any issues involved in moving the database from a local drive on the current server to an external storage system. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Moving Exchange Database
Double Bummer! It seems I had a moment of dyslexia - what I'm about to deploy is a SAN, not a NAS. SANs are supported. As a matter of fact the idea is to keep running only differential backups (logs only, all the logs) every night. Once a month (or less, tuning will be needed, fortunately we have the whole sunday available as a downtime window): - full online backup. - stop exchange services. - detach a mirror of the databases. Offline backup of the whole server (os ecc.) except the databases. Restart of services. - backup the detached mirror of the databases (offline backup of the db files, added with the backup of the previous step this constitutes a whole offline backup). - reattach and sync that mirror to the (already running online) master discs. In case of need for a single mailbox restore (really has been needed only twice in 3 years, the Ed Crowley metod works fine): on a spare identical box (spare network) restore the whole offline os backup and databases. Restore online logs if neccesary, restore mailbox. In case of disaster recovery: Ditto, then move server to main network. Supposed advantage: This should minimize restore time, since there's no need for the reinstallation of OS, service packs, exchange, service packs. Also the restore time of the databases as a offline file restore should be less than a restore of the exchange db. Disadvantage: from time to time (once a month ? once a week) a downtime window is needed, for the time neccessary to stop services, OS backup, start services. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 10:44 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database Microsoft Does Not Support Network Attached Storage (NAS) http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;317173 Microsoft says it will not support the configuration because it can cause corruption in Exchange databases and degrade the performance of the server. http://www.nwfusion.com/news/2001/0618infra.html William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Herold Heiko Sent: Wednesday, January 22, 2003 1:32 AM To: Exchange Discussions Why ? Probably I'll have to do a transition to a NAS (Hitachi, reselled by HP) sometime soon, so I'm somewhat interested :) Obviously I will test before moving the production databases, though. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 2:50 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Moving Exchange Database If you are describing a Network Attached Storage device, step away from the keyboard. John Matteson Geac Corporate ISS (404) 239 - 2981 Atlanta, Georgia, USA. -Original Message- From: Eve Jimah [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Posted At: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:31 AM Posted To: Exchange Discussion List Conversation: Moving Exchange Database Subject: Moving Exchange Database I am running exchange 5.5 service pack 4 on NT4 server. We have just acquired an external storage system and a new drive letter is mapped to my exchange server pointing at this new storage system with up to 40g assigned for exchange . I now want to move my exchange database from the current location on drive d: to the new location which is drive E: I intend using the performance optimizer tool, are there any issues involved in moving the database from a local drive on the current server to an external storage system. Thanks _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Add custom smtp header ?
Argh. I *did* check cdolive and slipstick, but still missed it. And found it, now. Thanks Heiko Herold -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, December 18, 2002 4:48 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: Add custom smtp header ? Yes, it's quite possible. Fishing lesson for the day... FAQ | Outlook? | Slipstick! | Search? | header | joy -- Chris Scharff, MVP-Exchange MessageOne Exchange Monitoring Reporting:http://www.messageone.com/MV.asp Free Custom OWA Screens: http://www.messageone.com/m1owa/index.asp On 12/16/02 2:05, Herold Heiko [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Is it possible to add a custom smtp header to outgoing email with EX5.5 ? I'd like to add a X-CUSTOM-something: data to outgoing email. More than that, if possible I'd like to add that data from code running in a custom form. Any chances ? Heiko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PFADMIN
You need to get a list of your folders - either walk the tree or directory export (admin.exe) with the column Folder-Pathname. Then massage the list in order to produce a series of lines like this: SETACLtabcomplete\folder\path\nametabusernametabO (use a real Tab char instead of tab, obviously) Then run something like type lines.txt | pfadmin mapiprofilewithpermissions This is with pfadmin.exe v1.3.0 DO TEST WITH with a test folder first, as always. Am I the only one who does not like being (or having a administrative mailbox as) Folder Owner everywhere ? Getting lots of conflict notifications for all the folders is not fun, I prever having the admin/antivirus mailbox every right except owner and folder contact. Bye Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Hatley, Ken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, December 12, 2002 10:44 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: PFADMIN Is anyone familiar with PFADMIN? I am looking for a way to systematically add myself as an owner to all public folders in order to assess the current environment in preparation for Exchange 2000. I am looking at the help files and it appears that I can at the very least write a batch file that adds myself as an owner to each Top Level folder (there a switch to add to all subfolders.) My question is, will that overwrite the existing permissions? I want to just add myself as an owner without affecting anyone else's ACLs. If this does not work, does anyone have any other suggestions or solutions? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add custom smtp header ?
Is it possible to add a custom smtp header to outgoing email with EX5.5 ? I'd like to add a X-CUSTOM-something: data to outgoing email. More than that, if possible I'd like to add that data from code running in a custom form. Any chances ? Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Progr. change PF permissions ?
Hello, is there any way to change programmatically the client permissions on public folders on EX 5.5? If I understand it correctly vba from outlook can't reach those properties. csv directory import neither I believe ? Cdo ? ADSI ? Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Public Folder Send As
You did unhide the PF, do you ? Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Sander Van Butzelaar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2002 11:39 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Public Folder Send As I suspect a Murphy rather than a real bug, but I'm unable to send as a public folder (nor a Distribution List). The error in outlook states: You do not have the permission to send the message on behalf of the user. I do have the send as box ticked. I have checked and double checked the rights, replication of DC's etc. I have gone through the archives and Microsoft TechNet and some 3rd party web sites, but to no avail. I'm running Exchange 2000 SP1 on a Windows 2000 SP2 box. No errors in the Event Log. Microsoft has a very short article on the matter, stating basically tick the send as box in the properties and off you go. I'm trying to replicate the problem on my test environment, but I thought I'd ask if anybody has ever run into anything like this before. Thanks Sander _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PF won't create in the correct container ?
EX 5.5 sp4. Due to some wrong design we have a separate container for some special PF (yeah, bad design, should have used adress book views ecc.) In order to create new folders there usually we do (this happens at very rare times though) change the PF container in information store site configuration, create the folder, change back. Since I had to add a second and third server I've got some problems with that. Situation is, only one server has a public store, no replication. Yet sometimes it does happen we have to wait a while and/or change that setting on more than one server, even if the outlook client creating the folder does use a mailbox on the PF server and the container change has be done on that server. Now the situation became even worse, as those PF simply won't create in that other container, but only in Recipients, even after changing that setting, waiting and double checking the new setting has propagated to the other servers ecc. Any idea what could be going on ? Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Contact Public Folder Problems (ex 2000)
Beside the obvious (check client permissions on the folder for that user), I have a similar problem with some (not all) contacts created with outlook 2K who can't be opened by old OL97. Apparently all the properties can be viewed in table view if appropriate columns are added, but the contact won't opened (can't be changed in table view, either). Could that apply ? Not very helpfull I suppose, sorry Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Jean-Francois Bourdeau [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 4:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Contact Public Folder Problems (ex 2000) Hi our customer has a Exchange 2000 sp1 (W2K SP2) server. one user is having problem to modify the contacts in one of the public Folder on wich she has the access to do it. Last time (1 month ago), we recreated the Public Folder database (edb file) and exported the Contacts to a user contact and draged back the contact in the Public Folder and it solved our problem. Now after one month the problem came back, that user cannot anymore modify the contacts in that public Folder. Any ideas ? JF _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Agent Tab missing onf PF
Any idea why the Agent tab could suddenly be somewhat missing from the properties of newly created PF ? Exactly, talking about a bunch of subfolders of a particular folder, - The service account and two admin accounts (one with service account permissions, the other one is a View only admin on the site but permissions admin on the container hosting those public folders) are configured as owner of Folders\System Folders\Events Root\EventConfig_servername. - Preexisting folders still have the agent tab visible for everybody with folder permissions. - Newly created subfolders have the agent visible for those two admin accounts, while the real service account won't get the agent tab for those folders although owner permissions are configured (through a DL the service account is member of). Adding explicit owner permissions doesn't change anything. - A copy of a existing folder with agent tab visibile has the tab visible, too. A copy of a folder without tab doesn't show the tab (to a profile configured for the service account ecc. ecc., the tab does still display for those other admin accounts). - a side-by-side compare of the raw properties of those folders didn't show any evident discrepancies (not that I'd expect some but..) In case it matters, the mailbox of the service account is hosted on a different server than the PF store server, while these other two accounts are hosted on the PF server. No other server in the site has a public store. Any ideas ? Heiko Herold -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907472 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: HELP IMS problems
FYI, in the time I had available I found no easy way to extract that info, so I ended with a helpdesk slave writing down through mbdbvu32 sender/time/subject of the mails in order to notify users, then deleting them. One of those mails made crash mdbvu32, probably the culprit. I ended not taking chances and erase/recreated the connector. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 2:47 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP IMS problems I dumped the whole application event log to a text file, nothing. Well, one thing: Three days before a mail was received in temporary file C:\EXCHSRVR\imcdata\in\HFHNJBAD. However the previous one was HFHNJBA1 and the next one HFHNJBAF so I don't think that's relevant. With XFOR: 4037 Event Starting Internet Mail Service, 1067 IMC Error [Q168883] (no luck) and Q165505 XADM: How to View/Delete Messages in MTS-IN and MTS-OUT Queues I can see what is present in MTS-OUT. I could just delete thos messages (not very nice), is there any way to set them undeliverable (send back NDR to internal user) or extract the data ? Going through evey one with mdbvue32 while writing down sender/recipients/date in order to notifiy internal users is not the best solution (lengthy queue). I'm looking for the documentation of the message properties I can see i that way, where can I find that ? Heiko Herold -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 8:15 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: HELP IMS problems Are you sure you don't have an error in the application log referencing a BAD message? The error appears just like that - with BAD in caps. -Original Message- From: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 11:36 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: HELP IMS problems Hello, I've some trouble here :( NT4, EX5.5 sp4, 3 servers in site, one of them with a IMS configured to forward everything to another host (sendmail box). The IMS just started to die without reason, no log anywhere. When restarted it does work for some seconds to die again even before the control panel thingy stops to animate its icon. Push up every IMS log available, restart.. nothing special anywhere, nothing in the event viewer, nothing (appareantly) different than usual in the exchsrvr\imcdata\log logs. So I raised it's cost, add another connector on another server with cost 1, change firewall and mail gateway, recalculate routing, now mail at least is flowing again but I still don't know what happened, and the queues of the old connector seem to be rather full. So for now I'm running a batch trying to start the connector every 30 seconds, some mail goes out, die, loop. Any idea ? It should not be a malformed incoming mail - everything waiting went to the new connector. Could be a outgoing mail, eventually (I hope) everyhting present now in the old connector queues will go out except that one, but how could I check ? The connector won't stay up long enough to check with axhange admin, at least the queue tab keeps staying grayed out. That machine had no change lately, there's no local antivirus, no disk defragger, no freshly installed software. Addendum: Now even worse. Trying to restart the service it seems to leave behind pieces in imcdata/out, and keeps adding them to the spool - which means a growing queue and multiple sent emails. ANY idea please ? Heiko Herold -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http
HELP IMS problems
Hello, I've some trouble here :( NT4, EX5.5 sp4, 3 servers in site, one of them with a IMS configured to forward everything to another host (sendmail box). The IMS just started to die without reason, no log anywhere. When restarted it does work for some seconds to die again even before the control panel thingy stops to animate its icon. Push up every IMS log available, restart.. nothing special anywhere, nothing in the event viewer, nothing (appareantly) different than usual in the exchsrvr\imcdata\log logs. So I raised it's cost, add another connector on another server with cost 1, change firewall and mail gateway, recalculate routing, now mail at least is flowing again but I still don't know what happened, and the queues of the old connector seem to be rather full. So for now I'm running a batch trying to start the connector every 30 seconds, some mail goes out, die, loop. Any idea ? It should not be a malformed incoming mail - everything waiting went to the new connector. Could be a outgoing mail, eventually (I hope) everyhting present now in the old connector queues will go out except that one, but how could I check ? The connector won't stay up long enough to check with axhange admin, at least the queue tab keeps staying grayed out. That machine had no change lately, there's no local antivirus, no disk defragger, no freshly installed software. Addendum: Now even worse. Trying to restart the service it seems to leave behind pieces in imcdata/out, and keeps adding them to the spool - which means a growing queue and multiple sent emails. ANY idea please ? Heiko Herold -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: C2C Compression Utility
It really is a client and a server product. The server product (which is better run on its own server) can be configured to select attachments with a bunch of rules, and replace them with a compressed (zip) version, while preserving SIS. The client side will decompress received attachments transparently on the fly when received (if composed of a single file in a zip, that is), using the clients cpu. Also it will transparently compress any sent attachments, or batch compress received files. Possibility of some rulesets, possibly centrally enforced. Licencing based on dynamic mailbox count. Currently I'm evaluating the product, I'd say nice but could have a better configuration logic and interface, yet not a bad product on the whole. YMMV, since I did only some sngle mailbox testing, not a complete real world usage test. Some smaller easily resolvable installation issues. Heiko Herold -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2002 6:29 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Re: C2C Compression Utility What do you want to compress or for that matter why? Does anyone have experience with the C2C Compression Utility for Exchange? Are there any other compression utilites that are better? Louanne [EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger: http://messenger.msn.com _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move mailbox = can't reveive ?
OK users should not be connected during move mailbox - no problem. But mail can't be delivered ? Let's see, this means a) every connector on every exchange server must be down, no user anywhere must be connected, or b) every connector on the source and destination server must be down, they must not be able to communicate with any other exchange server in the same org/site, but they still must be able to communicate with a domain controller. Oh, no user logged in those two servers obviously. Seems not exactly an easy task if you don't want to risk loosing mail during a move mailbox... is there any way to do this ? Every network has moments when there are few users and external mail is trickling in slowly, but still not 100% sure. For the drive space issue... I was still thinking, what if on a partition is say, pub.edb only ? BTW I'm just copying the exchange resource kit and service pack on that partition :) Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Jim Brady [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:01 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move mailbox = can't reveive ? Users shouldn't be connected to the server while their mailboxes are being moved, nor can mailboxes accept mail while they are being moved (assuming your using the mailbox tool). 1 GB question - done this myself and works great ... freeing up a few hundred MB does get the store back up quickly, although I've never see this on a best practices list. Quicker than moving the logs to another drive. Jim -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Herold Heiko Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 6:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Move mailbox = can't reveive ? EX4.4 sp4 say, server Gateway (IMC connector only), server A and server B (mailboxes). During move mailbox from A to B arrived a incoming mail (smtp to Gateway) for the mailbox on the move. server A sent back a reply Your message ... did not reach the following recipient(s): Display name on Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:33:39 +0100 Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=... ;l=Gateway020201281117D5DWCYXN MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:site:server A Is this normal ? During move mailbox incoming external mail is rejected ? I could not find any reference to this in technet (well, searched only for a couple of minutes to be honest, found nothing related). Similary, I was looking exactly when a services will shut down for no more space available (now you know why I'm moving mailboxes :), the only thing I found was several references (EX 5.5 Server Guide, Administering and Maintaining, the Disaster Recovery White paper and similar) to res1.log and res2.log. Those are 5MB each and are used as last resort when the disk is full - does this mean services shut down really at the last moment (new page can't be allocated) ? Somehow I always thought it would shutdown with some % of disk space still available. If the services do shutdown when the store partition is really full could it be considered a good practice creating a 1GB (or something) file, which can be deleted in order to create space as last resort... say, to restart services and move somewhere else some mailboxes or public folders ? Then decide if to spank the users who eat space like peanuts or the managers who want won't allow space limits, in order to use the infinite resources approach for supposedly faster development but won't fund the same infinite (or at least sufficent) approach to server space ? Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: Move mailbox = can't reveive ?
Well, I did mov some mailboxes during prime time the other day (for space reason): phone user with top #1 mailbox please close outlook until notice, move mailbox, give clearance for outlook. After moving around ~ 10 users (~7GB, sigh) I got notice from a couple of those for bounced and resent mail. So I was wondering if there is a better solution. As it sems the low-traffic time with crossed fingers way seems to be the only better one, possibly combined with the delay external mail prior to entering the exchange system. As a matter of fact I need to take a look again at the configuration of our mail gateways (sendmail) - it should be possible to match the relevant addresses before every other rule, and send it to an empty IP address (without anything answering on that address) so the mail would just sit in the queue. Then redirect it to a real mail gateway later, after completition of the move. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2002 2:25 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Move mailbox = can't reveive ? My average mailbox move takes around 5 minutes. Actual risk of mail being NDR'd is a number significantly close to zero (e.g. I moved 1100 users from one server to another one evening and received 0 complaints about bounced or missing mail). Mail which is sent during that time is bounced, not lost, so the sender can simply try and resend the message... not like the occasional odd NDR doesn't happen anyway. What's the actual problem we're trying to solve here or is this just an academic exercise? -Original Message- From: Herold Heiko To: Exchange Discussions Sent: 1/29/2002 6:01 AM Subject: RE: Move mailbox = can't reveive ? OK users should not be connected during move mailbox - no problem. But mail can't be delivered ? Let's see, this means a) every connector on every exchange server must be down, no user anywhere must be connected, or b) every connector on the source and destination server must be down, they must not be able to communicate with any other exchange server in the same org/site, but they still must be able to communicate with a domain controller. Oh, no user logged in those two servers obviously. Seems not exactly an easy task if you don't want to risk loosing mail during a move mailbox... is there any way to do this ? Every network has moments when there are few users and external mail is trickling in slowly, but still not 100% sure. For the drive space issue... I was still thinking, what if on a partition is say, pub.edb only ? BTW I'm just copying the exchange resource kit and service pack on that partition :) Heiko _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Move mailbox = can't reveive ?
EX4.4 sp4 say, server Gateway (IMC connector only), server A and server B (mailboxes). During move mailbox from A to B arrived a incoming mail (smtp to Gateway) for the mailbox on the move. server A sent back a reply Your message ... did not reach the following recipient(s): Display name on Mon, 28 Jan 2002 12:33:39 +0100 Unable to deliver the message due to a communications failure The MTS-ID of the original message is: c=us;a= ;p=... ;l=Gateway020201281117D5DWCYXN MSEXCH:MSExchangeMTA:site:server A Is this normal ? During move mailbox incoming external mail is rejected ? I could not find any reference to this in technet (well, searched only for a couple of minutes to be honest, found nothing related). Similary, I was looking exactly when a services will shut down for no more space available (now you know why I'm moving mailboxes :), the only thing I found was several references (EX 5.5 Server Guide, Administering and Maintaining, the Disaster Recovery White paper and similar) to res1.log and res2.log. Those are 5MB each and are used as last resort when the disk is full - does this mean services shut down really at the last moment (new page can't be allocated) ? Somehow I always thought it would shutdown with some % of disk space still available. If the services do shutdown when the store partition is really full could it be considered a good practice creating a 1GB (or something) file, which can be deleted in order to create space as last resort... say, to restart services and move somewhere else some mailboxes or public folders ? Then decide if to spank the users who eat space like peanuts or the managers who want won't allow space limits, in order to use the infinite resources approach for supposedly faster development but won't fund the same infinite (or at least sufficent) approach to server space ? Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: unread mail marked read by itself ?????
Multiple exclamation marks... a sign of a diseased mind. Terry Pratchett Maskerade Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Jim Helfer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 4:49 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? I sure do !!! -Original Message- From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:40 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? No. I find them annoying as well. Anyone else find them annoying? :) Regards Mr Louis Joyce Network Support Analyst Exchange Administrator BT Ignite eSolutions -Original Message- From: Soysal, Serdar [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 28 January 2002 15:41 To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? It is also possible that the users themselves do it without knowing. Another possibility is that if they have a delegate, the delegate might have had their Inbox open in a separate window. Since these two people are higher up in the company it is quite possible that they have a number of delegates that manage their calendar, and maybe even respond to their messages. S. PS: Am I the only one who finds multiple question marks extremely irritating? -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:35 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? This is a possibility. If this was the case someone would have to sit there and scroll though each message thus marking it as read. Correct? TIA -Original Message- From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 10:20 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: unread mail marked read by itself ? I would guess someone is reading their email. They probably have OL set to mark as read when selection changes. -Original Message- From: Aristotle Zoulas [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, January 28, 2002 7:17 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: unread mail marked read by itself ? Is this possible? Several members of the firm that I am consulting for claim to have had this problem. They came in one morning several days ago and to their surprise, mail that they NEVER read was marked as being read by outlook. The firm is running Exchange 5.5 with outlook as a client . Some possibilities are: 1.)something happened to the internal database that caused this error.2.) Someone within the company tampered with the mail and read their mail, thus marking it as read. 3.) Perhaps their backup system had something to do with it. They are doing brick level back ups using Veritas 8.5. #3 does not seem like an option since only two people, albeit high level IT people, were affected. This also NEVER happened before. Any help would be appreciated. _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe:
PF restore problem
A coadmin of mine created somewhat of a problem when I wasn't available (some PF rehoming done incorrectly, without waiting for replication), some PF contents are gone. Take restore server, reinstall (NT4, sp, exch 55, sp4). Restore stores (from backup exec 8.5, private and pub, no dir). Restart services, run DS/IS consistency adjuster (with all 4 options enabled, Filter set all inconsistencies). Run, ok. Mailboxes appeared correctly, assign permission, connect with client, ahah, the PF is there, click on it: PF unavailable ?? PF did NOT appear, in ex administrator Public Folder Resources contains only EventConfig, Events Root, Offline Address Book and Schedule + Free Busy info. Note the PF structure appeared fine, just the contents are missing - trying to access the folder content from OL (or property in ex administrator) I get a msg roughly like the contents are unavailable - either the server computer servicing this pf is down or the pf has not been replicated to this site. Basic check of the ebd file sizes: priv.edb 5GB, pub.edb 11GB (about same size as the working server, ok). Wondering if any content at all has been restored I tried a offline defragmentation of the public edb - compacted down to about 3GB which should be correct - I moved lot of data to another server lately. Any idea what I did wrong or what to do ? In the meantime I'm restoring again from scratch in case I forgot something basic but I just can't understand what :( Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PF restore problem
Found! Q164805, b. After restoring the public folders there are instance on the site of this folder but NOT on your server (for the moment). That is the cause of the error message reported in the symptoms section and the reason why you can't access the contents of all the restored folders. To solve this problem you need to select the Public Information Store Object. On the File menu, click Properties and in the Instance tab add all the restored folders to your server. So after all what I did was correct, I just missed a (vita) point :) Michael, Beat, Roger, thank you all very much. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Rickenbacher Beat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, January 10, 2002 2:07 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: AW: PF restore problem Did you try: Error Message: The Contents of This Public Folder Are Currently Unavailable http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;DE;q164805? Additional Input: Function and Effects of Running the DS/IS Consistency Adjuster http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;DE;q182979 Ricki -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: Herold Heiko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Gesendet: Donnerstag, 10. Januar 2002 11:56 An: Exchange Discussions Betreff: PF restore problem A coadmin of mine created somewhat of a problem when I wasn't available (some PF rehoming done incorrectly, without waiting for replication), some PF contents are gone. Take restore server, reinstall (NT4, sp, exch 55, sp4). Restore stores (from backup exec 8.5, private and pub, no dir). Restart services, run DS/IS consistency adjuster (with all 4 options enabled, Filter set all inconsistencies). Run, ok. Mailboxes appeared correctly, assign permission, connect with client, ahah, the PF is there, click on it: PF unavailable ?? PF did NOT appear, in ex administrator Public Folder Resources contains only EventConfig, Events Root, Offline Address Book and Schedule + Free Busy info. Note the PF structure appeared fine, just the contents are missing - trying to access the folder content from OL (or property in ex administrator) I get a msg roughly like the contents are unavailable - either the server computer servicing this pf is down or the pf has not been replicated to this site. Basic check of the ebd file sizes: priv.edb 5GB, pub.edb 11GB (about same size as the working server, ok). Wondering if any content at all has been restored I tried a offline defragmentation of the public edb - compacted down to about 3GB which should be correct - I moved lot of data to another server lately. Any idea what I did wrong or what to do ? In the meantime I'm restoring again from scratch in case I forgot something basic but I just can't understand what :( Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: PF restore problem
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Yep. One crucial step is missing, and I've never found it documented in the DR Whitepapers.. GRRR. In ExAdmin, you need to add a replica of the PF to the restore server. Once you do that, you'll have client access to them again. Exactly. Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Moving folders through replication, agent scripts
Just a thing I found out while experimenting with PF replication, moving, where some PF have agents installed. I thought somebody else could find this interesting. Some help arouse by Michael Veitch (thanks). Two server, same site, PF server for old and new is the old server (new didn't have a PF store until recently). PF with agent on old server. Add replica on new server, wait for syncronization, change home server, wait, remove instance on old server. Bummer, agent won't run anymore. Give permission on the destination server for the Events Root\Eventconfig_server and wait some time, until dest. server is available for selection in outlook - agents - run scripts in this server. Change it, test: Event has fired for newly arrived object, but not for a couple of email arrived while the event service was still configured on the old server. This is rather important - appareantly it means it is necessary to move the event script to the new server *before* removing the old instance. It also means when moving recursively (with propagate change to subfolders) lots of folders it is necessary to change manualy from outlook the server scripts are running on, or to write code which does it, before removing the old instance. Bye Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:26 AM To: 'Herold Heiko' Subject: RE: Public Folders Maybe a stupid question, have you installed the event service on the new PF server ? If you have you given yourself the necessary rights to create an event, client permissions must be at least author level? Mike -Original Message- From:Herold Heiko [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent:28 November 2001 10:02 To: Veitch, Michael Subject: RE: Public Folders Yes, could be usefull, thanks. In fact in this moment I'm experimenting with the event service: after replicating, changing home server, remove original replica the event service on the dest. server won't monitor that folder. In fact in outlook there's a value run these agents on these servers where currently the old server only is selectable. Still pooring through documentation. Bye Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Veitch, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 11:00 AM To: 'Herold Heiko' Subject: Public Folders Just in case your trying to check if your PF's are fully replicated, there is a tool supplied on the Exchange CD that you can use to do this: The Public Folder Replication Verification tool (Replver.exe) compares public folders on Microsoft Exchange Server computers to determine if their contents have been successfully replicated. Might be worth a look. Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: (stupid?) directory replication question
Yes, and every restore seems to be like the turn-back-in-time thingy from the third book :( I'm really wondering what will happen the first time I'll need to restore something replicated. Most probably a big eruption, but not exactly of lava :-). I'd better start documentating possible problems and need for testing NOW. On the other hand, after a brown eruption of that kind possibly I could finally get resources (most notably, time) for a *decent* testing environment. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, November 26, 2001 4:34 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: (stupid?) directory replication question You're not alone. This public folder replication stuff is like the Hogwarts curriculum. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Herold Heiko Sent: Friday, November 23, 2001 1:41 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: (stupid?) directory replication question Oh. In this moment all visible (255/750) in folder replication status on the old server are local modified, while those visible on the destination server ((41/750) all are in sync. I'm starting to wonder, since those are live folders, where both users work and incoming mail is routed, could this be just due to new changes applied continously, never permitting a complete quiescent state ? I still lack to understand how exchange works in this case - I suppose once the whole old content has replicated, the new arriving content from outside is queued for both (all) servers containing a replica (knowing which ones from directory replication), so it would not be a problem removing the old instance if the old content has been replicated. However if I understand it correctly exchange users always use the instance on their local server (performance optimization) - this means any user who's mailbox is on the old server does work on the instance hosted in the old server. Now, if I remove that replica, just a moment after a change has made on the old server (not in sync), is that change still queued and will it be replicated, or will it be lost ? In other words, once the original content has replicated, is it possible to remove that replica on a live server, or is it necessary to force somehow a completely quiescent system (kick off users, shut inbound connectors ecc, wait for replication ) ? On the other hand, if it is possible to remove the old instance as soon as the base content has replicated, how are we supposed to know when this is if every new change puts the state in modified ? I suppose it is possible to wait and catch the exact moment for single folders, but if you need to relocate a bunch of folders (remove old server or whatever), how are you supposed to do it ? Also, just another terrifying thought, what if lots of those folders had agents installed ? Initially those agents were running on the original server. At the end of the process they will be running on the new server. But in between ? Is exchange intelligent enough to run them on one server only ? Or will it be run on both, possibly conflicting ? Feeling more newbie than ever :( Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 10:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: (stupid?) directory replication question Message size limits aren't supposed to apply to public folder replication messages. I think you should wait a little while longer. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Herold Heiko Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: (stupid?) directory replication question I need to move a pf structure (about 750 folders, about 3GB according to outlook, however there should be lots of duplicated attachments) to another server. All servers are 5.5sp4. I thought it would be simple - from admin.exe, root folder of the structure, add a replica to the new folder, propagate to the subfolders. Check the public info stores in both server: Replication schedule is set to always. Since this has some priority, lower the interval to 5 minutes and push up the message size limit to 2MB (probably overkill). Wait for full replication (has been a couple of days due to other issues). Public store on the destination server has grown a lot, then stopped (looking
RE: Will restored folders be destroyed by replication
Which would destroy SIS for those files ? Or is there a possibility to preserve it ? Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 10:19 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: Will restored folders be destroyed by replication Restore to a recovery server, copy the lost items to a PST, then copy them back into production. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Putley Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2001 10:52 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: Will restored folders be destroyed by replication Hi, please could someone help with this I have a E2000 server that replicates to a number of E5.5 servers in various sites. The E2000 server had issues with it's public store and an ill advised eseutil /p was performed, this stripped all attachments to postings :-( The stripped version of the postings has replicated to other sites. If I restore the public information store from tape (which is what should have been done in the first place) will my restored copy be immediately destroyed by replication since the striped folders at other sites are more recent that the copy on tape? Is there a strategy to avoid this? Thanks for you help Mike _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
RE: (stupid?) directory replication question
Oh. In this moment all visible (255/750) in folder replication status on the old server are local modified, while those visible on the destination server ((41/750) all are in sync. I'm starting to wonder, since those are live folders, where both users work and incoming mail is routed, could this be just due to new changes applied continously, never permitting a complete quiescent state ? I still lack to understand how exchange works in this case - I suppose once the whole old content has replicated, the new arriving content from outside is queued for both (all) servers containing a replica (knowing which ones from directory replication), so it would not be a problem removing the old instance if the old content has been replicated. However if I understand it correctly exchange users always use the instance on their local server (performance optimization) - this means any user who's mailbox is on the old server does work on the instance hosted in the old server. Now, if I remove that replica, just a moment after a change has made on the old server (not in sync), is that change still queued and will it be replicated, or will it be lost ? In other words, once the original content has replicated, is it possible to remove that replica on a live server, or is it necessary to force somehow a completely quiescent system (kick off users, shut inbound connectors ecc, wait for replication ) ? On the other hand, if it is possible to remove the old instance as soon as the base content has replicated, how are we supposed to know when this is if every new change puts the state in modified ? I suppose it is possible to wait and catch the exact moment for single folders, but if you need to relocate a bunch of folders (remove old server or whatever), how are you supposed to do it ? Also, just another terrifying thought, what if lots of those folders had agents installed ? Initially those agents were running on the original server. At the end of the process they will be running on the new server. But in between ? Is exchange intelligent enough to run them on one server only ? Or will it be run on both, possibly conflicting ? Feeling more newbie than ever :( Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, November 22, 2001 10:17 PM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: RE: (stupid?) directory replication question Message size limits aren't supposed to apply to public folder replication messages. I think you should wait a little while longer. Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP Tech Consultant Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP) All your base are belong to us. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Herold Heiko Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:30 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: (stupid?) directory replication question I need to move a pf structure (about 750 folders, about 3GB according to outlook, however there should be lots of duplicated attachments) to another server. All servers are 5.5sp4. I thought it would be simple - from admin.exe, root folder of the structure, add a replica to the new folder, propagate to the subfolders. Check the public info stores in both server: Replication schedule is set to always. Since this has some priority, lower the interval to 5 minutes and push up the message size limit to 2MB (probably overkill). Wait for full replication (has been a couple of days due to other issues). Public store on the destination server has grown a lot, then stopped (looking at the free space on the filesystem). Huh ? the public store now seems to be about 8GB, outlook said 3GB (and there sould be some SIS kicking in, too), after another day I've got (on the dest server) 1221 events of 116MB free in public. Free space ?? Let's check the replication status: source server\pf store\server replication status says: in sync on dest server says: local modified. Hmm I suppose this is because those are live folders - users are working in some of them, in the original copy on source server I suppose (since that one says in sync) Let's check which folders exactly. source server\pf store\folder replication status: huh ? Almost all of those are local modified, only 27 folders are in sync - should be at least 50% due to the current usage pattern. Also, only 44 folders (only 2 of those are in sync) have a last received time, starting from the moment I added the second replica to now. All the other have a empty entry in that column, although something must have been replicated since the store on the dest server grew a lot more than the expected amount. Check the same on the dest server: about 41 of those folders are listed, all have a last received time listed, all are in sync except a couple. Where are the others ? Am I doing
RE: outlook closed when moving mailboxes?
With 5.5 the client often will Dr.Watson if open, anyway it won't work. So, the answer is: NO, you must close the client. Dunno with E2k. Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 26, 2001 10:09 AM To: Exchange Discussions Subject: outlook closed when moving mailboxes? Just a short one about moving mailboxes. Can I move mailboxes to another server without closing the clients outlook, or does it has to be closed before moving? _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Purge PFs by date or other criteria ?
Hello, is there any easy way to a) export (to PST) for long-term storage a number of elements in a number of PF, selected by date or other criteria, and b) possibly if requested remove those items afterwards ? Basically something like Mailbox manager for PF, possibly more geared for periodic semimanual operation ? Thanks Heiko -- -- PREVINET S.p.A.[EMAIL PROTECTED] -- Via Ferretto, 1ph x39-041-5907073 -- I-31021 Mogliano V.to (TV) fax x39-041-5907087 -- ITALY _ List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Exchange List admin:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
