It's a bigger issue than just people with legacy software. OWA provides
anytime, anywhere access to email. If I'm at a buddy's house and I
want to check my email, I don't want to have to create an Outlook
profile on his computer.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
in order for Outlook to
correctly connect to Exchange after the mailbox has been moved to a new
server. It can then safely be re-enabled. Is this the expected behavior?
Thanks
Jason Clishe
Senior Network Engineer
NuSoft Solutions, Inc.
248-258-6500 x228
[EMAIL PROTECTED
Does anyone have any experience with this product? Thoughts / comments?
http://us.neverfailgroup.com/
Jason
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
to the thread, complaining because you didn't get
the answer you wanted regardless of the veracity of the answer really
has low value.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Sunday, December 21, 2003 7:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc
first post.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Posted At: 22 December 2003 15:22 Posted To: Swynk Exchange (30 days)
Conversation: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only?
Subject: RE: Force opening PF attachments as Read-Only
attachments as Read-Only?
But the answer given to you was a solution. It was not one that you
agreed with or was suitable for your environment, but it was a solution.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 10:48 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc
Also depends on what OS Exchange itself will be running on. If it's on
Win2K, you'll also lose VSS.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Microsoft
Exchange List Server
Sent: Monday, December 22, 2003 6:21 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
When a user has a Public Folder attachment open, other users can also
open the same attachment and make changes. Is there any way to prevent
this? For example, to force the document to open as read-only when
someone else has it open?
Jason
with Exchange. There are
many others that may or may not integrate with Exchange.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent
I think he *is* referring to the Outlook 2003 pop-up. That's how I read
it, anyway.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Fyodorov,
Andrey
Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 12:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Rumour - Spammers
What does this post have to do with Exchange?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Greg's Utterly Fascinating Views on Ethics
OK, for some reason
For crying out loud, drop it already! Nobody cares! Sheesh.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Waters, Jeff
Sent: Thursday, December 18, 2003 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
Greg,
Ever go
Ha! Plonk is right. Wonder how many people on this list have killfiled
Greg? Wish I would have about a week ago; would have cut down on about
half the traffic from this list.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erik Sojka
Sent:
A) Exchange 2000 doesn't have a service account. This would explain why
you can't get your service account to access a mailbox. :)
B) If you want an account to have the ability to open another users'
mailbox, grant it Send As and Receive As rights.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
Shut the fu*k up already, everyone. If anyone wants to continue this
childish diatribe, take it offline.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Greg Deckler
Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 10:10 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Webb, Andy
If $1200 is 25% of a GW-Ex migration for 700 people then the project
was severely underscoped and underbid.
No kidding. The design and implementation plan alone for a project of
that size is
Let's say that a Domain Admin sits down at an Exchange server and
launches Exchange System Manager. Let's also assume that this user has
NOT been granted any Exchange administrative roles through the
Exchange Delegation Wizard.
What can he do? Can he install a new Exchange server? Dismount
Right. All mcary was saying is that he thought you HAD to be using
Outlook 2003 with Exchange 2003 in order to use cached mode.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Camara, David
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:14 PM
To: Exchange
My question is why on earth would you bother doing an offline defrag on
an 11 MB pub.edb?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Willem Jackson
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 4:56 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Need Help
OK, I know the majority of this list is against clustering Exchange. But
does anyone have some sound reasoning behind this argument that could be
used to convince someone at the executive level? I don't think many
executives are too compassionate for the it's harder to administer
argument. And I
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Looking for anti-clustering arguments
What Exchange version?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Monday, November 24, 2003 2:11 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Looking for anti
Single server environment, Windows Server 2003 running Exchange 2003.
OWA works flawlessly internally. However, whenever anyone tries to
access OWA from the Internet, they are presented with the logon prompt,
then after entering their credentials, IE chugs for about 5 seconds and
then they get an
MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 3:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking
Obviously you've skimmed over a lot of details, but overall that method
will work just fine.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of PATRICK,
MARTIN
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2003
-
From: Jason Clishe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2003 1:11 PM
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Exactly my point. Jim is saying it's NOT relaying if the client
authenticates, and I'm saying otherwise
username and PW.
Best Regards,
JMU
Jim Underwood
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 00:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is Blocking Mail from My Exchange Server 5.5
Ummm, if Earthlink didn't relay
Ummm, if Earthlink didn't relay, than how would any Earthlink subscriber send their
email?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jim Underwood
Sent: Monday, November 10, 2003 1:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: AOL is
I've setup a couple of RBL's in Exchange 2003. Is there any way to
monitor the messages that get bounced by the RBL's? Ideally I'd like to
see a log of the sender, recipient, and time of message, that way I can
provide some reports.
Jason
Outlook 2003, Exchange 2003
Every now and then, some emails will have a question mark on the
first line of the body of the message. The sender did not put it
there. This only seems to happen on internal emails, not on emails
received from the Internet. There seems to be no other rhyme or
reason
You are being Joe Jobbed.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Smith Thomas
Contr 911 SPTG/SC
Sent: Friday, October 31, 2003 10:47 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Bogus Email
I have Exchange sever 5.5., and our naming convention
This is not true...you CAN add DC's to an SBS domain. Obviously those
DC's cannot be SBS servers.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Dickenson,
Steven
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 11:49 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
, 2003 8:47 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disappearing email
Force a password change on all of them. If something is POPing it, that
will stop it.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 5:24 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Exchange 2000 SP4
I've got a user (Outlook 2000) that, beginning last week, claims to have
had some email disappear on her. In one instance, she said she saw an
email come into her Inbox, then saw it disappear within a second, before
she had a chance to open it.
I didn't really spend anytime
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Eric Holtzclaw
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 5:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Disappearing email
Could be a recalled message?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday
!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 1:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Disappearing email
Exchange 2000 SP4
I've got a user (Outlook 2000) that, beginning last week, claims to have
had
Is your other server (the one that didn't fail) also a GC? You'll have
all sorts of problems if you don't have a live GC anywhere on your
network.
JC
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Timothy
Schilbach
Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 1:00
in the Event logs?
Good luck always,
Samantha
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 6:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RPC over HTTP on a single DC/GC/Exchange server?
Has anyone been able to get RPC over HTTP to work when
Your plan is fine. I did the same thing here. I built an Exchange 2003
server using the eval media, then moved all the executives mailboxes to
it. That way they can get used to using the new OWA and RPC over HTTP.
I'm hedging my bet that when the evaluation expires, there's no way
they'll want to
Has anyone used the RBL feature in Exchange 2003? How effective is it?
What is / are the most reliable list to use?
Thanks
Jason
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
I'm surprised how quiet this group is being regarding this issue. This has potentially
enormous ramifications. For one thing, this effectively breaks reverse-DNS lookups
that anti-spam applications use to verify sending domains as being valid.
Come on now, Verisign is masking the difference
Does anyone know if the OfficeScan Corporate Edition 5.5 server can be installed on
Windows Server 2003? The documentation doesn't explicity say either way. I'd assume
that some IIS tweaks would be required.
Jason
_
List posting
imagine not. Officescan is for workstations. You need
ServerProtect which will run on W2K3
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 9:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT: OfficeScan on Windows Server 2003?
Does anyone
As far as DNS is concerned, yes. As far as AD is concerned, no. You'd
need to create a trust.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic
Hi Guys,
Is it possible to have an
Create 2 batch files that launch Outlook via the runas command.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 3:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Icon's and piping username/domain/password.
Exchange 5.5
We
newsgroup posts that indicated that
the registry mod does not always work.
Has anyone seen this and happen to know a solution? This is extremely
annoying
Jason Clishe
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
I know the spam topic gets beat to death here, but I've got an executive
request here.
What I need is a product that will scan and delete messages on a POP3
server *without downloading them*. Ideally, this would be a product that
runs as a standalone service somewhere, and has a configurable
Is it possible to change a users' LegacyExchangeDN? Specifically, the
surname.
Jason
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web Interface:
, 2003 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Changing LegacyExchangeDN
You could probably use LDFIFDE to do so. If you want to do
it en mass then there is the LegacyDN tool.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Jason Clishe
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
We are seriously considering building a Red Hat / SpamAssassin /
gateway antivirus box. Can anyone recommend a good Linux SMTP gateway
antivirus product?
Thanks
Jason
_
List posting FAQ:
of the
permissions from.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 4:31 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange permissions
What about it?
If I use ADSIEdit to view the permissions at the Org, I see
the same thing that I
I've recently inherited an Exchange 2000 Organization. One of the first
things that I noticed was that all Domain and Enterprise Administrators
have the ability to open and read anyone's mailboxes. I've checked the
ACL on our mailbox store (we only have one), and both Domain Admins and
Enterprise
: Looking for POP3 Spam solution
What would this spam filter filter on if it didn't download
the message to inspect it?
From: Jason Clishe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 08:58:12 -0400
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED
I didn't think the backup API in Exchange was capable of that speed,
regardless of hardware.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 4:15 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Software for Exchange 2000
for POP3 Spam solution
I would get an anti SPAM gateway and put it in front of your
mail server.
That way it will catch the SPAM before it gets in the mailboxes.
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 5:58 AM
To: Exchange
, August 07, 2003 3:46 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Exchange permissions
ADSIEdit
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 07, 2003 11:14 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange permissions
I've recently inherited
When you made the new DC a GC, did wait at least 5 minutes and then
reboot it?
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Hague, Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, August 01, 2003 12:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Several questions on E2k and Active Directory
Single
I posted a message to the list a few days ago about a problem I'm having
at a client. To summarize, all Domain Admins and Enterprise Admins have
full administrative rights in Exchange, even though those groups are NOT
listed in the Exchange Delegation Wizard. Unfortunately I didn't receive
any
Start - Run - Dcpromo
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Doug Schaible [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2k Domain Controllers
I have an Exchange 2000 Server that also happens to be a
domain controller.
?
If your gateway is not overburdened, why bother making a change?
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Freelance E-Mail Philosopher
Protecting the world from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jason Clishe
Sent
I was recently examing the Exchange 2000 environment at a new client. I
ran the Delegation Wizard at the Org level to see which accounts had
rights into Exchange. To my surprise, only a single ExchangeAdmin
account (not a group) had been granted Exchange Full Admins rights. No
other accounts were
I've always configured my Exchange bridghead servers to forward outbound mail to the
SMTP gateway / Antivirus box that sits in the DMZ. Recently I talked to another
engineer that says he always configures his Exchange bridgeheads to go straight out to
the Internet, bypassing the SMTP gateway.
Dell puts out a pretty cool magazine for free called Dell Power
Solutions. Is anyone aware whether or not HP / Compaq produces anything
similar?
Jason
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Web
I'm running into a situation at a client where email addresses never get
generated on any new mail-enabled user or group. We've waited as long as
overnight and still no email addresses. But if we restart the System
Attendant, the addresses appear in a matter of minutes.
The environment is as
It is absolutely essential that you have virus protection on your Exchange
servers, over and above whatever gateway virus protection you might be
running.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel
Sent:
customers.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:bounce-exchange-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Atkinson, Daniel
Sent: Friday, July 04, 2003 10:22 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: best linux av?
why?
-Original Message-
From: Jason Clishe
-Original Message-
When I configure the SMTP Virtual Server to send all mail to the eSafe
Smarthost first, no mail routes to Site2.
Why are you messing with the SMTP Virtual Server properties? Do you have an
SMTP Connector?
In order to get your situation to work, all you have to do
66 matches
Mail list logo
