I cannot prove that an apple is red - well they're not if it's a
granny smith
nor that the sky is blue - quite often isn't in Blighty!
Happy Holidays - Peace and Goodwill to all men eh!
;-)
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to
whom it is
: Speaking of MOOT, can anyone tell me what top 10 classic rock single
contains the word MOOT?
Do you mean in the band name, song title or lyrics?
Eg:
Moot The Hoople - Ballad of Mott the Hoople (1973)?
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to
whom
The problem here is that Greg's opinion is that accepting gifts
presents a real or perceived conflict of interest.
The key point being the word perceived. The statement covers all
eventualities.
If the CoI is not real, it remains possible for it to be perceived -
even by only one individual -
Opps sorry my bad - only just read this one.
-Original Message-
From: Boyd, Nathan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 18 December 2003 01:03
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Migrating from GroupWise 6.5
The next person who wants to add something to this thread, please send
your
Oh for f**ks sake get over this. At the end of the day we are *only* IT
Professionals providing a service. We're not that important in the
bigger picture. Sure, some will abuse their position and that's a not
too nice part of human nature - greed and nepotism. Full stop. It
happens all the
player-of-the-season award
Nice analogy
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to
whom it is addressed. It should not be deemed to constitute a binding contract
between TKC Group and the recipient(s) unless a purchase order number is quoted. Any
I've been asked to get a 'wish list' together for next years budget so
I'm going all out for an upgrade from present setup:
Small Business Server 2k (inc exch2k) to PDC running W2k3 on present box
but will need a new box for Exch2k3
What would be a (relatively sensible) 'ideal' setup. I've read
more closely to the IT guy!
Eric Fretz
L-3 Communications
ComCept Division
2800 Discovery Blvd.
Rockwall, TX 75032
tel: 972.772.7501
fax: 972.772.7510
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: Thursday, November 06, 2003 5:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: strange headers
Hi, our organisation received an email yesterday and I don't quite know
why it appeared the way it did.
Basically, someone sent an email from
Hi, our organisation received an email yesterday and I don't quite know
why it appeared the way it did.
Basically, someone sent an email from a Hotmail address yet the 'from'
field did not display the hotmail address, but an address that looked as
tho it was from our network. Now I know that
Or you could use some form of collaboration software such as Outlook
Team Folders (similar to PF's but more versatility)- unsupported by MS
at present but it looks good. If u can't find it I can send the pack
over -it's only about 1.6mb for both files.
Have a look at:
directions. Check out
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?displaylang=enfamilyid=
9e52bafc-5c33-46b9-af14-04e4d989ef6b
From: Rob Hackney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Re-assign/ Move mailbox
Date
SBS 2k (exchsp3 pos fixes)
I have a user whose account has become corrupt and on advice from PSS I
have been told to delete it. I have created a new account for the user
which accesses the original mailbox. I would like to move/ re-assign
the original mailbox which is attached to the corrupt
and then remove the old corrupt account from the
permissions.
Maybe I am missing something, but that should do it.
Nate Couch
EDS Messaging
--
From: Rob Hackney
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, September 15, 2003 7:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re
Did look at Lsoft but it is too pricey for my lot!
-Original Message-
From: Wehner, Paul (wehnerpl) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 03 September 2003 19:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Mass Mailings
I second the LSoft recomendation.
Univ. of Cinci uses it and it's amazingly
I've been tasked with running similar stuff over the pond here.
I've tried a few if the cheaper versions you can get off download.com
and they were pretty rubbish.
If you're looking for a decent opt-out one then I'm testing Lyris List
Manager which seems to test ok so far.
And it's only $500.
Hi, I have a site running ex2000 sp3 on an sbs2000 (windows2k sp3) box
where all permissions on the mailboxes have been set to default =none.
I have been asked to change calendar permissions to reviewer and rather
than doing each mailbox individually, I am attempting to use the setperm
tool.
Is
install Outlook (run
all from my computer) from the Office 2000 CD you're good to go. #2 is
indeed in the SDK, I believe it is compiled though.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney (old) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Tuesday, September 02, 2003 4:57 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation
they are in use. Are they of large size and
maybe taking a little while to be sent? The badmail you can safely
delete.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 06, 2003 12:29 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Quick question...
Hi, Exch 2000
I
Hi, Exch 2000
I have items in my badmail directory - most recent from 28/07/03 and I
also have items in my mailroot\vsi1\queue folder.
Can I delete these items? Nothing is showing up in my queue thru system
manager
Thanks
Support Analyst
TKC Group Ltd
Unit 5 Ashmead Ind Est
Keynsham
BS31 1TZ
UK
!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 3:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: OWA and the M:
Hi,
I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the
properties for the public
Has anyone used the Outlook Team folders that is now discontinued?
I'm trying to get the outlook team folders wizard to work on my system
(sbs2000/ exch 2000 sp3) however I am getting the following error:
Error: occurred during HTTP publishing of Web files. Select OK to try
another destination to
Hi,
I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the
properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it
points to is the M:\domain\public folders and \mbx respectively. Is
this by design as I thought the M: did not exist as such? (Sorry for
another q on
-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 20. juni 2003 12:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: OWA and the M:
Hi,
I stopped my IIS services recently on and restarting I noticed in the
properties for the public and exchange folders that the directory it
points to is the M
:
you can replace that M:\blah-blah-blah with \\.\BackOfficeStorage\
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 7:36 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OWA and the M:
Thanks - just needed re-assuring!
-Original Message-
From
Hi,
I've been reading q327378 about changing mailbox size limits in a
reasonable time and have added the value for the exchangeIS.
Should I be concerned that there is not the value for
Dsaccess\Instance0\CacheTTLUser in my registry or one for Mailbox cache
limit?
If not concerned I can just go
Hi,
Exch 2k sp3 outlook 2k
As per Ed's 'never restore' method, I have set up mailbox retention on
my departing users. I gave permission to the admin account to access a
users mailbox who has departed in order to check any emails. I have
since deleted the mailbox and account within AD however
Hi,
Exch 2k on sbs2k - all SP'd up
I had a little scare earlier on with a simultaneous virus alert on one
user and a disk space warning from my server which turned out to be
totally unconnected however while I was trouble shooting a noticed a
couple of odd things:
1) disk space on the
Using exch 2000 sp3 with backupexec 8.6 for sbs2000:
If I am backing up the microsoft information store but not microsoft
exchange mailboxes or the M: drive then there is no point in
backing up program files\exchsrvr is there? Or should I still backup
the program files\exchsrvr directory but
from PSTs and Bricked Backups!T
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: Wednesday, March 26, 2003 2:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Quick question re backup
Using exch 2000 sp3 with backupexec 8.6 for sbs2000:
If I am
Er yes geology being the study of the history of the earth and its life
especially as recorded in rocks whereas geography deals with the
description, distribution, and interaction of the diverse physical,
biological, and cultural features of the earth's surface
Or did I miss the joke ;-)
Wow, 116 ish posts on this crock of sh1t.
Anyway, Mr Muir deserves some compensation for having to work in Luton
[1]
[1] UK joke...
Rob
MCSE + a, b, c thru to I
MVPE
A+
CNNE
BA (hons)
A-levels
GCSE's
This email is confidential and intended solely for the use of the individual(s) to
whom
Hi all, have searched archives/ technet and done a google but no joy...
I have a user who is using Outlook98 on our exch 2k server
She has been complaining that a recipient never receives attachments
from her.
I have tested her logged into another pc - still on outlook 98 and
recipient got the
Thanks but perhaps I wasn't clear. The recipient will get the
attachment if *sent* from another mailbox - tested from a w98/outlook98
pc and a xp/outlook2002 pc and from users mailbox when configured on
another pc (w98 or xp) on another pc. When I send from the users
w98/outlook98 pc, the
Hey Simon, you didn't go to Southampton did you?
-Original Message-
From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 November 2002 13:07
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Turns out BTOpenworld have decided to block port 25 for all home plug
and go
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: 29 November 2002 16:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Strange Incoming Mail Problem
Hey Simon, you didn't go to Southampton did you?
-Original Message-
From: Simon Bond [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27
What version of exchange/ outlook are you using? If youre using exh2k
and outlook 2002 then most attachments are blocked by default - I'm not
sure about earlier versions of outlook.
The blocked attachments are referred as level one. Have a look at
Q290497
-Original Message-
From: Kim
the first. And since virtually any
Exchange based AV will do this for you, why not take advantage of such a
great feature?
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 26, 2002 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: attachments
What version
That's a file that doesn't have a clue about how the system operates but
wants to open everything and just gets larger and larger over time
without any discernible output while taking up a huge amount of
resources.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
It depends on what you want to achieve...
If these people are to *always* send from company B (new company)then
just add the new (smtp) mail address in their mailbox properties and set
that as primary/ reply address.
Alternatively, if they only need to send occassionally, then set up
another
What type of server is the advanced server (ie pdc/ member)? SBS is a
pdc so if you've set up the new server as that also, I don't think it's
possible.
You could put the 2 servers on different network segments and exmerge -
or exmerge and copy to backup tape.
You can use the csvde or ldifde to
Over here in the uk working for a small co (salaried), got it written
into my contract that I get overtime for 'special circumstance'. Eg if
a server goes down or an upgrade goes wrong and I'm here till 3 in the
morning then I'd get time and a half but if I stay till 7pm instead of
5.30 pm then I
1. Buy a book or look on m$security/ win2000/ permissions/
company policies and procedures
2. event viewer...
-Original Message-
From: Carlos Magalhaes [mailto:CarlosM;trencor.net]
Sent: 29 October 2002 08:54
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange White PAper???
Before you get shot down in flames by someone else ;-), sp3 is
cumulative I believe so no need to install the others.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:schotanus;intas.be]
Sent: 24 October 2002 10:51
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: SP3
Does SP 3 for E2K replace 1 and
I had a similar setup at my old place.
We had an online spare server that was setup to xcopy relevant files (*.edb/etc)from
exch server to itself over night.
However, we had created a dual boot on it. primary boot was just as member server
that was effectively an archive box but secondary boot
sounds like he already has
-Original Message-
From: Dupler, Craig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 16 October 2002 17:29
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: viewer of PST
Sensitivity: Private
I think those graphics would look like an ASCII representation of a binary
file.
Some
oops sorry misread question.
apologies
-Original Message-
From: Tony Hlabse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 15 October 2002 16:58
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Exchange server migration
If your in Native mode you could move the server in Site B to Site A. If
your in mixed you
I had a similar migration going from sbs4.5 (site1) to sbs2k (site2)
Used exmerge and it went like a dream but I din't have public folders and as far as i
recall, public folders cannot be done.
There are some articles on technet (see sbs2000 upgrade migration white papers) which
tell you how to
. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, October 11, 2002 10:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: NDR From Field
I can see to whom
skateboards/ inline blades/ bmx's and clothing/ accessories.
Thanks to the other suggestions - I'll look into them.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:Rob.Hackney;tkcsales.co.uk]
Sent: Thursday, October 10, 2002 9:11 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: OT - Web Mail hosting
Hi all
thanks all - this thread can now close. done the updates and all went smoothly
-Original Message-
From: KC Lemson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 September 2002 18:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: sp3 revisited
ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can
Do you have a fireproof safe at all? I would have thought you would even if you are a
small business. To get a little (boltdown)safe that is fireproof for an hour or so
(hopefully long enough for the fire service to get there plus maybe put it somewhere
sensible) isn't too expensive and you
Another thing -does your boss know what raid means?
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Kleinsinger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 September 2002 09:37
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Backup Hardware
This has got to be a joke. Taking a spare drive from a RAID 5 is not a valid
ok, i'm suffering from a bit of mental fatigue here so can someone help
me out...
I'd be correct in thinking that sp are cumulative so I can hop from exch
2000 sp1 to sp3 without a worry yes?
I know that ms state that they are cumulative but would like to hear it
'from the horse's mouth'
thanks
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: urgent backup problem
hi all,
can anyone help me with the following scenario:
sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4
tape drive has failed and I'm
backup, but better than nothing at all, and
easier and more reliable than copying the files manually
Chris Quinn
IT Manager
Blue Planet Aquarium
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 September 2002 16:39
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: urgent backup
hold of a old MS select CD and install from there and patch it).
Cheers
Paul
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 10 September 2002 15:05
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: urgent backup problem
Thanks Paul, sounds good - but rather than trying
hi all,
can anyone help me with the following scenario:
sbs4.5 exch 5.5 sp4
tape drive has failed and I'm waiting for a new one to replace it.
However, as I've had to test the tape drive to make sure that it really
is knackered and not anything else, consequence is that there has been
no decent
Not being too familiar with my way round exch2k, how can I check what
the version is and which service pack I am using? I've had a look at
the registry: HKLM\software\micorsoft\exchange but nowt there and I've
also run hfnetchk but that only came up with windows 2000 service pack 2
missing.
,
Julian Stone
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 02 September 2002 09:15 am
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: checking version/ service packs
Not being too familiar with my way round exch2k, how can I check what
the version is and which service pack
with a minimum of
effort.)
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 4:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs
d'oh...should've tried that!
thanks
-Original Message
, wear anything with tentacles and you'll attract the same
good, helpful crowd.
(:=
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Hackney
Sent: Monday, September 02, 2002 9:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: checking version/ service packs
It seems that we're all at it...
There's been a few threads to this so apologies if this has been covered
but I don't think *this* bit has:
I've searched web and done reading of technet/ white papers etc and
found the following:
SBS: How to Upgrade SBS 4.x to SBS 2000 (Part 1 of 2):
It seems that we're all at it...
There's been a few threads to this so apologies if this has been
covered but I don't think *this* bit has:
I've searched web and done reading of technet/ white papers etc and
found the following:
SBS: How to Upgrade SBS 4.x to SBS 2000 (Part 1 of 2):
Hi,
exch2k and outlook2000 enviroment:
A user has had an ndr sent to him but when he tried to open it, it
failed to open (using outlook 2000) and just hung. Is there anyway of
viewing this mail within the administrator program? I have had a look
in the badmail directory but it is not in there
to open the message with
OWA.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 27 August 2002 11:10
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: viewing ndr
Subject: viewing ndr
Hi,
exch2k and outlook2000 enviroment:
A user has had an ndr sent to him but when
the message with
OWA.
Neil
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: 27 August 2002 11:10
Posted To: Swynk Exchange List
Conversation: viewing ndr
Subject: viewing ndr
Hi,
exch2k and outlook2000 enviroment:
A user has had an ndr sent to him but when he
isn't this an autodial setting?
-Original Message-
From: Stuart Errington [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 27 August 2002 14:38
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Exchange 2000, ISA and ISDN
Hi,
Are there any how-to's out there that tell you how to make a SBS2000
server bring up the
Hi all,
can anyone shed some light onto the following...
On my exch 5.5 sp4 server, if I look at the profiles on the inbox mail
client I have the following listed:
ExchangeAdmin servername 0x04c63a
ExchangeAdmin servername 0x04da3f
ExchangeAdmin servername 0x04f24b
ExchangeAdmin
I had a similar environment in my old job which was on an exch5.5
server. If i needed to check how had sent the meeting requests, I think
the way I did was just to log on to that mailbox using the mail client
on the server and checking the inbox. I'm afraid I can't remember
exactly how I did it
ta, thought as much. sometimes it's tricky to get whether someone's
being sarcastic/ witty/ etc or not ;-)
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 August 2002 22:11
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email
Yes. Email headers are
Hi all,
I am planning a migration from 5.5 to an existing 2k/AD server because
of an office relocation. 2 different sites which are not connected but
same domain (kind of... Under NT the domain is called mydomain and
under SBS2k it is mydomain.co.uk).
I've read up on the WP and also related
in Bath?
Advertising for a general techie bod a while back?
I thought of applying, but you weren't paying enough!
Cheers
GWG
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 14 August 2002 09:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email
ta
?
-Original Message-
From: Missy Koslosky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 August 2002 19:24
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Unsolicited Email
a... Deckler's back. It's been a long time...
- Original Message -
From: Rob Hackney [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
Email
Eng! Wrong Answer...especially if you are using McAfee. See
link
below.
McAfee anti-virus software fails to block Klez virus sometimes...
http://www.silicon.com/public/door?6004REQEVENT=REQINT1=54540REQSTR1=s
ilic
on.com
(may wrap)
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney
: Mass email software
You need to watch for those who will shortly be trying to get your ISP
to kill your SPAM operations.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 12:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Mass email software
have you looked at Q199831?
-Original Message-
From: Mark Condron [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 August 2002 10:14
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: AD connector
All,
I am installing Exchange 2000 and active directory connector. The
exchange
installation did not complete because
I would imagine that it is system related. What level logging have you
set it to? Maybe increase to max to get more info?
-Original Message-
From: Dandy, Jim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 August 2002 17:23
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Service account logons - hacker?
snip Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers. /snip
Ok, so I'm not the creme de la creme but I wouldn't count myself as the
creme de la merde either (no comments pls!) but why not look at headers?
When our mail server was used as a spam relay I looked at them and could
see where
: Rob Hackney
Reply To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: Monday, August 12, 2002 07:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email
snip Nobody on this should list should read the SMTP headers.
/snip
Ok, so I'm not the creme de la creme but I wouldn't count myself
looks like it
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 12 August 2002 15:13
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Unsolicited Email
I think you missed Erik's sarcasm tags.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
The marketing dept of my company has just told me they were asked to buy
some mass email software called infacta (www.infacta.com) by a director.
Apart from the obvious issues like bandwidth (they're on a 128 dialup
isdn!) what other issues should I be looking out for?
thanks
Rob
intY has
Look at the headers of the email
-Original Message-
From: Exchange List [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 09 August 2002 11:52
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Unsolicited Email
Dear List,
Today, our senior executive's received Illegal/unsolicited email with
the name of one of our
don't worry about the ram - I'm running a exch55 sp4 sbs4.5 sp6a server
on a PII 350 with 256Mb ram and disk space of 2gb and 10gb (only approx
30 users tho)!
tell him not to worry!
btw - this server is being made redundant in 3 weeks !
no trouble with it yet
-Original Message-
From: Ed
very funny!
shaken baby syndrome mailing lists
society for biomolecular screening...
social and behavioural society
not quite the sbs I think he was looking for.
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 01 August 2002 21:35
To: Exchange
search engine...
www.google.com
www.google.co.uk
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 14:43
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
Can someone give me the URL for Google?
-Original Message-
From: Martin
meow
-Original Message-
From: Erik Sojka [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 31 July 2002 14:47
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: None Exchange related
Can you open my milk, mommy?
-Original Message-
From: Julian Stone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 31,
I reckon the footers being attached. Bit like 'do not include original
when replying in outlook options (except you can't do the same with fwd)
-Original Message-
From: David N. Precht [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 29 July 2002 14:50
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Forwarding
the
message filtering options and after you create the folder.
-Original Message-
From: Rob Hackney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2002 12:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Stopping Spam
it's pretty difficult to stop spam as such - precisely
it's pretty difficult to stop spam as such - precisely for the reason
you have discovered: domains keep changing...
you really need a dedicated 3rd party solution for this as ex is not
good enough as is.
q2 - have a look at http://spam.abuse.net/
as for q3 - don't know and can't remember as not
Thanks for the help.
Have ended up just turning off routing/ relaying as it wasn't needed.
Couldn't do anything else to prevent the out queue being clogged apart
from install a firewall and have mail routed thru the ISP smtp mail
server which is up-to-date.
-Original Message-
From:
Your point being?
I have read almost all I could find on this problem (inc the faq) - this
mail list was my last port of call
We are running SBS4/exchange 5 sp2 NOT exchange 5.5
The article in the faq and q169683 relate to exch 5.5. I cannot see any
routing restrictions tab in the version of
Your point being?
I have read almost all I could find on this problem (inc the faq) - this
mail list was my last port of call
We are running SBS4/exchange 5 sp2 NOT exchange 5.5
The article in the faq and q169683 relate to exch 5.5. I cannot see any
routing restrictions tab in the version of
93 matches
Mail list logo
