In the spirit of the Friday Haikus of old, here's one for anybody whose on call-out
over Chistmas:
I SAW THREE CHIPS
-
I saw three chips just fail and die
The sysops say they came that way
The server upped and waved Goodbye
On Christmas day in the morning.
And who was on the
of Information Technology
Sabic Americas, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam
filtering.
We have used Xwall for about a year
: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam
filtering.
I was just taking a look at Xwall and it does in fact look pretty good.
Questions:
What operating system are you running it on?
Does it need a separate SMTP server to be running or does it provide its
own? If it needs another, what
: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam
filtering.
I am running it on W2K Advanced server (we are doing load balancing for
failover) although it will run nicely on W2K Server (what we initially
tested it on)
uses its own SMTP server .. can run on the machine that Exchange
unique whitelists for
individual users ...)
For the price, it is great ... Probably be bought out soon ...
mike
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Off-topic
, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
Exchange 5.5
Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send.
This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on
our front
7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2003 14:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam
filtering.
Let us all know what you
Exchange 5.5
Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send.
This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on
our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change the
smtp port for Exchange on the IMC's to use 24 since XWall
: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
Exchange 5.5
Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send.
This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange on
our front end IMC relays. One of the requirements is that we change
: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 10:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
Exchange 5.5
Sorry if this came through twice. Had to change the text type and re-send.
This is a little off-topic. We are about to deploy XWall for Exchange
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
POP, if I'm not mistaken, uses port 110.
Users mail could potentially get marked as spam I would think as they will
be sending through the smtp connector. Someone please correct me if I'm
wrong.
-K
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Slightly off-topic
I know this is a bit off-topic, but what are you folks using to keep your
Outlook/Office installations up to date? Since there's no automatic
updates, and SUS supposedly doesn't support office updates... Are you using
third-party tools?
Thanks
I know this is a bit off-topic, but what are you folks using to keep your
Outlook/Office installations up to date? Since there's no automatic
updates, and SUS supposedly doesn't support office updates... Are you using
third-party tools?
Thanks,
Matt
Hi Guys,
Is it possible to have an active directory domain as a child domain
under a master NT4 domain?
thanks
Raj
**
This e-mail message, including any attachments, contains information that is
confidential, may be
As far as DNS is concerned, yes. As far as AD is concerned, no. You'd
need to create a trust.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic
Hi Guys,
Is it possible to have
Not exactly.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:01 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Off topic
Subject: Off topic
Hi Guys,
Is it possible to have an active directory domain as a child domain
under a master NT4 domain
Thanks, that's what I thought.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic
Not exactly.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted
much
clearer now.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:24 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
I said Mailfrontier not Matador
Why yes. Yes he did.
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Chris Scharff wrote:
Mailfrontier is the name of the company. They have two
Yeah, I was real impressed by the challenge notices I got from
subscribers to lists I post to. Not.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:48 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world
I said Mailfrontier not Matador.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Yeah, I was real impressed
.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:24 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
I said Mailfrontier not Matador.
-Original
No problem but thought I would post. One of out Affiliate Hospitals was
rejecting mail and it turns out the Osirusoft blacklisted the world. Anyone
who runs RBL's might want to look at this. We currently don't run RBL's,
but I thought the article was interesting.
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:34 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Subject: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world
Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
There have been lots of posts
Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution.
Its even cheap!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:44 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world
Chris,
How were you able to determine that the drive mapping was causing the
problem? We have a similar problem here, and can't find anything in the
event logs that pinpoints the problem. It would be easy enough to test by
disconnecting drive mappings, but I'd be happier if there was something
PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic: Windows accounts are getting locked out by
themselves
Chris,
How were you able to determine that the drive mapping was causing the
problem? We have a similar problem here, and can't find anything in the
event logs that pinpoints the problem
This is a little off topic. Running Scanmail 3.80 engine 6.510 pattern 587.
When a external user sends an infected message to lets say 30 users and only
one is on our Exchange, scanmail cleans that message but sends a
notification message back to all 30 users stating it cleaned it?
Man
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic ScanMail Notifications to Sender.
This is a little off topic. Running Scanmail 3.80 engine 6.510 pattern 587.
When a external user sends an infected message to lets say 30 users and only
one is on our Exchange, scanmail cleans that message but sends
bill
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server
I don't personally like the idea but it's what Small Business Server is all
about, albeit
All,
Excuse me for the slightly off-topic inquiry. We are currently rolling out
Exchange 2000 - we have about 10,000 users in several locations - 150-300
users per office on average. We run the Exchange 2000 servers also as Domain
Controllers, with the addition of DNS and DHCP. Everything works
, he he.
Sorry, I got carried way.
Dot
-Original Message-
From: Miller, Robert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 12:39 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server
All,
Excuse me for the slightly off-topic inquiry. We
, 2003 3:39 AM
Subject: A bit off topic - Multiple apps on 1 server
All,
Excuse me for the slightly off-topic inquiry. We are currently rolling out
Exchange 2000 - we have about 10,000 users in several locations - 150-300
users per office on average. We run the Exchange 2000 servers also
, Robert
Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 10:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
All,
Excuse me for the slightly off-topic inquiry. We are currently rolling out
Exchange 2000 - we have about 10,000 users in several locations - 150-300
users per office on average. We run the Exchange 2000 servers also
Does anyone know an AD mailing list as good as this one is for Exchange?
Thanks.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: **OFF TOPIC**: Active Directory
Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List?
Thanks
Dirk du Plooy
Analyst
Centre Of Excellence (COE) Midrand
For: Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd
Company Registration Number 1997/014212/07
Tel: +27 (0) 11 266 5445
Cell: +27 (0) 82 336 5263
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NOTICE: This message and any
W2k server or active directory?
-Original Message-
From: Dirk du Plooy - CPX Mngd Services
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List?
Thanks
Dirk du Plooy
Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List?
Thanks
Dirk du Plooy
Analyst
Centre Of Excellence (COE) Midrand
For: Comparex Africa (Pty) Ltd
Company Registration Number 1997/014212/07
Tel: +27 (0) 11 266 5445
Cell: +27 (0) 82 336 5263
e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
NOTICE: This message and any
msnews.microsoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dirk du Plooy -
CPX Mngd Services
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List
WINNT-L
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/winnt-l.html
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Dirk du Plooy - CPX Mngd Services
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:24 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
Subject: Off
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA
David Clark Company Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
WINNT
Hi all
Does anyone know of a good SQL list as good as this one is.
Cheers
Vas
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To
]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 4:20 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Totally off topic
Hi all
Does anyone know of a good SQL list as good as this one is.
Cheers
Vas
_
List posting FAQ: http
Everyone on that list pretty much switched over to sswug.org
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Totally off topic
http://www.swynk.com used to host a few good ones. Start
7:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Totally off topic
Everyone on that list pretty much switched over to sswug.org
-Original Message-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE
Thanks
Vas
- Original Message -
From: Roger Seielstad [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 12:53 PM
Subject: RE: Totally off topic
Good to know. Thanks..
--
Roger D
Discussions
Subject: RE: Totally off topic
http://www.swynk.com used to host a few good ones. Start there.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE
Sr. Systems Administrator
Inovis - Formerly Harbinger and Extricity
Atlanta, GA
-
From: Roger Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 21, 2003 5:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Totally off topic
http://www.swynk.com used to host a few good ones. Start
Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my recovery
box), the backup tape drive on the recovery system will not
recognize the any tapes from the other systems. I put the
tape in and I get use cleaning tape. Looked at drivers
Somewhat off topic.
We recently upgraded our servers to Windows 2000 server with SP3 running
Exchange 5.5 SP5. The systems have DLT 7000's attached to them and I have a
recovery server that I use for restoration that also has a DLT 7000.
After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my
I may be the DLT driver.
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:06 PM
Subject: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
Somewhat off topic.
We recently upgraded our servers to Windows
: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:06 PM
| Subject: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe
OK OK. Well it seems many problems with DLT tape drives not working
correctly are the drivers.
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
You
After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my recovery
box), the backup tape drive on the recovery system will not
recognize the any tapes from the other systems. I put the
tape in and I get use cleaning tape. Looked at drivers and
I don't know if it's related, but I remember some
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 6:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic)
What do you not like about Exchange 2000 queue management?
Hey it is much better than IPSwitch Imail where all the queue files,
temp files
topic)
Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic)
OK. Please tell me what mail software allows to manage queues
on 50 servers in a more centralized manner.
-Original Message-
From: William Lefkovics [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 12:20 PM
Did we say anything specific that would break the NDA?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic)
Break your NDA off-list, please, so those of us who
: IMC as relay system (off topic)
Did we say anything specific that would break the NDA?
-Original Message-
From: Tom Meunier [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 11:01 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic)
Break your
You people need to chill out. I did not discuss anything about *ium and am not
planning to.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2002 11:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic)
Fine, great
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Fyodorov
Sent: Thursday, September 26, 2002 6:55 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic)
What do you not like about Exchange 2000 queue management?
Hey it is much better than IPSwitch Imail where all the queue files,
temp files
as relay system (off topic)
Exchange 2000 SMTP is quite good, providing you don't skimp on hardware.
I have a couple of Exchange SMTP gateways that are load-balanced with
WLBS. One is a dual CPU, 650MHz, 512 MB RAM. The other one is single
CPU, 800MHz, 512 MB RAM.
They are probably relaying
, September 26, 2002 5:16 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: IMC as relay system (off topic)
Queue management is pretty nice???
William Lefkovics, MCSE-NT4, MCSE-W2K, A+, WLKMMAS, ExchangeMVP
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andrey
Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information.
Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases for the University
finally took a big hit. Its a VMS system running PMDF and is run in a
different department. We've been asked to look at alternative
(PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 25, 2002 1:40 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: IMC as relay system (off topic)
Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information.
Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases
Exchange 5.5 SP4.
Sorry to post this again. Maybe someone new has some information.
Well the system that processes the @UC.EDU aliases for the
University finally took a big hit. Its a VMS system running
PMDF and is run in a different department. We've been asked
to look at
All,
We have a problem that only really manifested itself when we tried a restore of
Exchange 2000 in a Disaster Recovery mode.
We have Exchange 2000, with all the storage groups on EMC.
We use Syncsorts Backup Express [ver 2.1.3e] to back up both the system as well as the
storage groups as
29, 2002 12:51 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution
---s lightly off topic
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09
Slightly off topic...
The outlook client configured for an exchange 5.5 server would perform
address resolution after the address was typed in the TO or CC field.
This could be seen because the address or username would be underlined
by a solid black line.
The outlook client configured
Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 11:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution
---slightly off topic
Slightly off topic...
The outlook client configured
resolution
---slightly off topic
Slightly off topic...
The outlook client configured for an exchange 5.5 server would perform
address resolution after the address was typed in the TO or CC field.
This could be seen because the address or username would be underlined
by a solid black line.
The outlook
Tools/Options/E-Mail Options/Advanced E-Mail Options.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 2:42 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution
---slightly off topic
resolution
---slightly off topic
Slightly off topic...
The outlook client configured for an exchange 5.5 server would perform
address resolution after the address was typed in the TO or CC field.
This could be seen because the address or username would be underlined
by a solid black line.
The outlook
In 2002 it is.
Geoff...
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Is Automatic Name Checking Checked
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Is Automatic
: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook
Isnt that option avail in 2000 as well?
-Original Message-
From: Dale Geoffrey Edwards [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
In 2002
]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
resolution---s lightly off topic
Is Automatic Name Checking Checked in Tools/Options/Email
Options/Advanced Email Options ?
-Original Message-
From: Kelley
, outlook 2002 and e-mail address resolution ---s
lightly off topic
Automatic is for kids and executives. Use Ctrl-K
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e
Not that option - the 'automatic name checking' option...
-Original Message-
From: Kelley, Jason [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 1:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
resolution---slightly off topic
, August 29, 2002 4:38 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail address
resolution---slightly off topic
As much as I have appreciated everybody's responses all the solutions
offered do not solve the problem I am faced with.
Suggestion: CNTRL-K - this does
:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000, outlook 2002 and e-mail
addressresolution---sl ightly off topic
However a message must have already been sent to the user previously,
if
that is the case
then when I'm typing I the name outlook will autofill and complete
the
address.
Yes
hehe - Not to mention the probability that there arent any storage limits on
that folder!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
I don't understand how a public folder rule
Mongo let replies out to Internet.
-Original Message-
From: Cohen, Bret [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
Set up a rule that reply's with a preset message and / or attachments
Bret Cohen
Viacom Information
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 00:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
I don't understand how a public folder rule is any less
susceptable to mail loops than an inbox rule.
I think we're back to closing our
the email address of the distribution list.
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic
I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive
resumes from outside
Under Exchange 2000 is there a way to turn on auto-replies to the internet
for a single user?
Running in mixed mode with Ex5.5 at this time.
Ron
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off-Topic Question
It's all or none.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from
This is a little off-topic. We recently went to a demonstration on
Mirapoint messaging systems. We're looking at Mirapoint as a possible
replacement to our aging student messaging system and potentially as
front-end servers for all incoming messages to the University. I was
wondering
I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive
resumes
from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only
works when a user
sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the
attendent off and then
on.
Is there a better why
www.cdolive.com
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic
I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they
receive
resumes
from outside the company
In-Box rule?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald
B.
Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic
I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive
resumes
from outside
Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 10:48 PM
Subject: Off Topic
I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they
receive
resumes
from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only
works when a user
sends an initial message
, June 24, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
In-Box rule?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald
B.
Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic
I'm trying to setup an auto reply
Use a PF with a rule on it Works better. Then give only HR dept. appropriate
access.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:44 PM
Subject: RE: Off Topic
But that will likely end up in constant
]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Off Topic
Use a PF with a rule on it Works better. Then give only HR dept.
appropriate access.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Subject: Off Topic
I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive
resumes
from outside the company. I've setup the out of office reply which only
works when a user
sends an initial message. They never get a 2nd reply unless I turn the
attendent off
I was told that there might be a way to keep the CTRL-ALT-DEL and/or
task manager from canceling an .exe or .bat file.
Does anyone know where I can find a way to do this with Windows 2000
server/workstation and Windows XP.
Thanks,
Chuck
1 - 100 of 261 matches
Mail list logo
