Exchange Server 2000 Entp Edition, SP1
Outlook 2000 in CW mode
I have created a list AD contacts for the frequently used SMTP addresses.
Suppose, I receive a mail from existing (AD contact enabled) internet
email
user, Exchange server resolves his email address into user-friendly
display name
as
1) Have you set up the bypass proxy connections so that IE is going directly
to the server and not via a firewall?
2) Try using the full IM address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) rather
than just the email address ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) of the user to log on
to IM with. Look it up in ADUC to get the exact
Hi,
I would be interested in hearing peoples opinions on the 'best' Exchange
2000 books that you have read, both in terms of technical reference and
general design and support.
regards
Dan Fryer
Project Manager
GlaxoSmithKline Plc.
Mine is the best.
SCOTT SCHNOLL/
Mine is the best.
TONY REDMOND/
Mine is the best.
JIM MCBEE/
Mine is the best.
PAUL ROBICHAUX/
Mine is the best... if only someone would publish the thing!
http://www.exchange-mail.org/books.html
What the heck am I doing up at 3:30am?
-Original
I second William's post and am also wondering what he is still doing up
at this time.
I've read Scotts and Tony's book and they are pretty good. Jim's book is
still on my 'to do' list.
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
What business goal are you actually trying to accomplish here?
Going on the assumption you want in inbound only (no outbound) or outbound
only (no inbound) connector. Technically it probably can be done, but it
isn't going to be very clean.
For inbound only, you should be able to put a
http://quick-study.com/chartDetails.asp?sku=381-2
William Lefkovics, MCSE, A+
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 4:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: manual
Where can I find an easy to use manual for Outlook 2000 and
And I know who MY money's going to be on! [1]
G.
[1] Sorry Andy - nice to have known you! :)
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 19:35
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
It musta
Um, you're calling Darcy obscene? Interesting
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 19:12
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: OT - flirtatiousness on THIS list??
flirtatiousness
prat
Hampshire
ass
Darcy
muppet fools
fish
Not meant as a smart *ss remark, but F1 does the trick nicely. If you need
something else then, OL for dummies is excellent. I teach an OL class and at
the end of the class I hand out the dummies books. All my students love the
books and covet them as a valuable resource.
Or you can get a
I'll pass...PST=BAD
-Original Message-
From: Govardhan Nandi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, November 10, 2001 4:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Assigning inbox to Rules Object for few exchange
users gives MAPI _E_INVALID_ENTRYID
Importance: High
Dear friends,
We
I sort on the rule if http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm;
appears in the body, then send it to my Exchange List folder. That
works.
Rob
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 12:07 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE:
Its just as easy to base the rule upon who it is sent to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:44 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Rules?
Thats the reason most other lists prefix
Title: ambiguous smtp proxy
An ambiguous SMTP proxy was found on 0x2 mailboxes in the DS. The store cannot map this SMTP proxy to a unique Mailbox GUID.
Anyone know how to determine which 2 mailboxes it means?
Also, has anyone had any problems with users sending from 5.5 accounts to 2000
Because its obnoxious to add that, as it breaks thread sorting capabilities
of some clients.
HINT: If you're not going to follow the best method (subscribe a public
folder for the mail and your personal account with the NOMAIL option), set
the rule up to move all mail sent TO [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Nice signaturethat Spanish too?
-Original Message-
From: Shields, Anthony [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 3:09 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: QA: OWA in forgien country
I thought it was interesting as well, that at various places once signed
Title: Message
To
find the ambiguous proxy, try running acsvde export of the AD with the
email addresses attribute included then manipulate it in Access or Excel
to find the duplicate.
As for
the latter issue, are your mailbox CAs two-way also replicating
deletions? I'd initially try a
I have no idea what you are talking about in regards to subscribe a
public folder and set NOMAIL?
So I should set a public folder to receive all my mail and I receive
none in my personal box?
Can you elaborate?
BTW, I have never had a problem with the subject being prefixed in any
This list and the
Outlook-Dev list are the only ones out of the 30 or so I
subscribe to that don't prefix the subjects.
Apparently the other 28 or so pander to the LCD.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
LCD?
What TLA is that a TLA for?
Mike Carlson
http://www.domitianx.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Master Of The Spoon People
Keeper Of None
-Original Message-
From: Chris [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:21 AM
To:
Q269498 XWEB: Cannot Log On to an Exchange 2000 Mailbox with OWA
-Original Message-
From: Robert Ellis
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/13/01 6:52 AM
Subject: ambiguous smtp proxy
An ambiguous SMTP proxy was found on 0x2 mailboxes in the DS. The store
cannot map this SMTP proxy to a
Lowest
Common
Denominator
-Original Message-
From: Mike Carlson
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 11/13/01 7:32 AM
Subject: RE: Outlook 2000 Rules?
LCD?
What TLA is that a TLA for?
Mike Carlson
http://www.domitianx.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Master Of The Spoon People
You've got it exactly right.
Subscribe a public folder to the list, with its subscription set to receive
all mail.
Then subscribe your own mail account to the list, but there is an option for
it to not receive mail (funny enough, the NOMAIL option).
I'm on about 30 lists as well, and I sub all
I subscribe all of ours to one address and to one public folder and then let
rules move them to the appropriate sub folders from there. That way there is
only one address to worry about. It makes it cleaner for me.
Simple things for simple minds.
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County
You are correct, but they can not modify anything which as I understand it
is what breaks the damned thing. Reviewer is for those who absolutely must
be able to view the resource for a free time prior to booking it.
I know that they can see all of that under the scheduling tab. Baby steps,
baby
Have you subscribed the Secret Cabal list to a PF yet? Oh yeah, TINSC [1]
[1] There Is No Secret Cabal[2]
[2] To subscribe to the Secret Cabal [3] mailing list that doesn't exist,
send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with NO SUBJECT and the words
subscribe secret-cabal (your name here, not in
I allow it on the IMS servers, but never on a mailbox server.
-Original Message-
From: Darcy Adams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:03 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: I need help with edb*.log files
I have circular logging turned on on my bridghead
Robert, go with what? What are you planning to change? Just because you
CAN does not ever necessarily mean you SHOULD, especially in the Land of
Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Robert Williams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 12:00 PM
To: Exchange
I stumbled on these files which seem to track all incoming and outgoing
mails on a SBS.
How/where are they generated, and is it necessary?
Kim
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives:
Do you come from the land of Exchange?
Where women glow and men plunder?
Can't you hear, can't you hear the thunder?
You better run, you better take cover.
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Hi Ken! Been busy. Changed our reply addresses and my exchange
subscription broke. The NT and SMS ones didn't, but this one wouldn't post
my messages until I unsubbed and resubbed again.
No, I don't allow reviewer anymore either. That is what I understand to be
breaking it, as it confuses
Hi,
I have a question about my upgrade to Exchange 2k. I am sure this is
probably documented somewhere but I can't seem to find anything that details
this specifically. We are not only upgrading our Exchange but upgrading our
Win NT machines to W2k. We have 10 servers in total. I have two
By default Exchange5.5 will keep tracking logs for seven days, I believe.
You can change the tracking log retention in the general tab of the system
attendant properties applet in Exchange administrator.
Message tracking had to be enabled. It is not on by default.
See this page for the
Hi William,
There is a sort of exchange thing on this server but it's nothing what
I'm used to... It's Small Business Server...
Kim
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 November, 2001 4:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: tracking.log
Uhhh sort of exchange thing on this server
What do you mean sort of? Not used to it? What are you used to seeing on
SBS?
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:12 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: tracking.log
Oh No Reviewer too??? What is this world coming to?
Oh the humanity!!
Well, I guess that I will be busy removing that too. Are you up on OL2K? If
so, how is the resource scheduling working for you. I have a few departments
that are all changed to OL2K or better and I have changed their
first time I see SBS for real...
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 November, 2001 4:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: tracking.log
Uhhh sort of exchange thing on this server
What do you mean sort of? Not used to it? What are you used
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
On Tue, 13 Nov 2001, Hunter, Lori wrote:
Robert, go with what? What are you planning to change? Just because
you CAN does not ever necessarily mean you SHOULD, especially in the
Land of Exchange.
One log to journal them all,
One log to find them,
One log to sort them all,
And in the
Ahhh
Well, SBS is a bundle of software. It contains NT 4.0, Exchange 5.5
Standard Edition, Probably SQL 6.5 Standard, SMS 2.0, and I think Proxy
server 2.0. I would suggest that you buy some books on the particular
software you use so that you understand what is going on. While these are
Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
? What??
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e
I'm actually trying to do another dept a favor, butt it seems like they
have designed some kind of childish view to give it a 'user-friendly'
interface or something... just horrible.
-Original Message-
From: Don Ely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 November, 2001 4:19 PM
To: Exchange
Exchange is still Exchange... more or less. Point a real Exchange admin tool
at it and have fun.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Doug Hampshire
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
How To:
Have Outlook 2000 File everything as last name, first name,
company without going to every single contact and changing it in the file as
box. Is there a way to change this with one click of a button for a public
contact folder that contains contacts.
RT
Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives
Absolutely. It's a simple 3 step process.
1. Write a script in CDO
2. Assign it to a button
3. Click button.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent:
You sure that works with outlook 2000. I went to CDO and used the script
and it gave me a runtime error.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:26 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook File As
Absolutely. It's a
OK... I understand. But I'm curious though... If by applying the post-SP4
hotfix for Q289606 that is supposed to correct this problem, would it
still be necessary to limit direct bookings?
-KHD
--
Kevin H. Devin
IT Systems Administrator
Alerton Technologies, Inc.
Redmond, WA
Actually I didn't go to CDO I went to slipstick woops
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:38 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook File As
You sure that works with outlook 2000. I went to CDO and used the
I'm sorry, let me rephrase step 1:
1. Write a usable script in CDO and debug as needed.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13,
CDO is a scripting interface, not a place.
Chris
--
Chris Scharff
Senior Sales Engineer
MessageOne
If you can't measure, you can't manage!
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:41 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
1.5. Know the difference between CDO and Slipstick.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:33 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook File As
I'm sorry, let me rephrase step 1:
1. Write a usable script in CDO
? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ:
http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
I've run into an interesting Exchange/Outlook problem.
For the longest time, my users could use Outlook (97 or 2000) and use Word
as their editor (using Word 97).
As of a week ago, suddenly, on of my users can't send attachments with Word
as the editor. If you turn off use work as your editor,
www.cdolive.com
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Computer Support Analyst
Network Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 13 November 2001 15:34
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook File As
CDO is a scripting
? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
turn off use work(d) as your editor
-Original Message-
From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:46 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Attachments w/ Word as Editor?
I've run into an interesting Exchange/Outlook problem.
For the longest
Hampshire
Sent: Tue 11/13/2001 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch
Ooops. Unfortunately, I'm about to turn off Work :) Anyone have a quick
solution? The KB doens't seem to have anything..
Denis
Denis A. Baldwin
Network Administrator, CAE. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Andy
Sent: Tue 11/13/2001 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
turn off use work(d) as your editor
-Original Message-
From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:51 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachments w/ Word as Editor?
Ooops. Unfortunately, I'm about to turn off Work :) Anyone have a quick
Sorry but you might laugh at me but what does CDO stand for. OOO I m going
to hear from this one.
-Original Message-
From: Joyce, Louis [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 10:42 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Outlook File As
www.cdolive.com
Regards
Never mind I got it. Thanks
Collaboration Data Objects (CDO) is a technology that is used for
applications that involve information sharing and flow processes. CDO is a
scripting interface to MAPI (Messaging Application Programming Interface),
introduced in Outlook 98. Prior to the
Agreed. Word is and has always been buggy as an email editor.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachments w/ Word as Editor?
turn off use work(d)
Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_m
icrosoft_s_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
/2001 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
Yes, those fixes only corrected it so that I could get access back to the
calendar.
Straight from Lori's (not calling you a horse :) ) mouth, NO Direct Booking,
NO Reviewer, Nothin'!!!
Ken Powell
Systems Administrator
Clark County Office of Budget and Information Services (OBIS)
Vancouver,
Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives
9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_m
icrosoft_s_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com
? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL
Given that, is there any way to use the spell check in Word and the
Autocorrect from Word in Outlook without using Word?
Denis
Denis A. Baldwin
Network Administrator, CAE. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Martin
, November 13, 2001 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_m
icrosoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http
: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_microsoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http
I remember Elaine well. She was one great resource in those pre-Ex4.0 days.
In those days, daily conversations with Elaine Sharp, Robert Shurtleff, and,
yes, even Brian Valentine were standard procedure. I guess I started using
the list just about the time Peter started the list. We got the Beta
Outlook XP has those capabilities...
-Original Message-
From: Denis Baldwin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachments w/ Word as Editor?
Given that, is there any way to use the spell check in Word and the
I forgot about that. Yes it does.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Don Ely
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:02 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachments w/ Word as Editor?
Outlook XP has those capabilities...
-Original
Those 2 itmes are not necessarily tied together. I be dun edumacated un I
cant spel wurth a durn. Of curse Andy will point out im one of them dang
burn managurs so its expectd that im impeared.
-Original Message-
From: Martin Blackstone [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November
Short of hiring people with an education that know how to spell? No. :)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Denis Baldwin
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:04 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Attachments w/ Word as Editor?
Given
-Original Message-
From: John Matteson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, November 12, 2001 2:04 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: To all the Vets on the list
To all the Veterans of all branches of the U.S. Armed
Services on the list:
Thank you for your
-
From: Doug Hampshire
Sent: Tue 11/13/2001 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc:
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_m
icrosoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_m
icrosoft_s_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives
Um, F7 fires off the speel chuker in any version of Outlook.
Hire better educated users if you think all email has to have proper
grammer.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 7:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_m
icrosoft_s
_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
_
List
!
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_m
icrosoft_s_e-m
ail_crown_1
Apparently Oracle and Email in the same sentence tripped this company's
email filtering policy.
Please note the policy that it tripped.
--
Roger D. Seielstad - MCSE MCT
Senior Systems Administrator
Peregrine Systems
Atlanta, GA
!
-Original Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_m
icrosoft_s_e-m
OK that did. It .. coke all over the desk... Hehehehehe..
I am crying from laughter
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Message-
From: Doug Hampshire [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:17 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Oracle to replace Exchange? Not!
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/h/cn/2003/tc/ellison_aims_for_m
icrosoft_s_e-m
ail_crown_1.html
OCH, my sides hurt Hehehe
Kevinm M WLKMMAS, UCC+WCA, CKWSE
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Roger Seielstad
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 8:13 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: FW: ScanMail Message: To Sender,
That fix didn't fix anything for me. YMMV.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Devin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 13, 2001 9:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Conference Rooms and such...
OK... I understand. But I'm curious though... If by applying the
I believe that OLXP does this. It at least autocorrects my spelling, and
seems to use the Word dictionary. And I definitely don't use Word as my
email editor.
Missy
- Original Message -
From: Denis Baldwin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday,
heh heh heh ... OL2K ... heh heh heh ... We're being force-fed an old
version of Netshield from the new 'rents. We are AHEAD of them on e-mail as
we use OL98 and Exchange 5.5 while they are still using OL97 on OpenMail.
They're mostly Novell as well.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL
I've read Jim's book twice. g I've also read most of Scott's. I like
both. Tony's I browsed through and found to be a little more high level.
Jim's is by far the most current.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
1 - 100 of 280 matches
Mail list logo
