of Information Technology
Sabic Americas, Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Wohlgemuth, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 01, 2003 10:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam
filtering.
We have used Xwall for about a year
: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam
filtering.
I was just taking a look at Xwall and it does in fact look pretty good.
Questions:
What operating system are you running it on?
Does it need a separate SMTP server to be running or does it provide its
own? If it needs another, what
: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam
filtering.
I am running it on W2K Advanced server (we are doing load balancing for
failover) although it will run nicely on W2K Server (what we initially
tested it on)
uses its own SMTP server .. can run on the machine that Exchange
unique whitelists for
individual users ...)
For the price, it is great ... Probably be bought out soon ...
mike
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:53 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Off-topic
Let us all know what you think of Xwall if you get it running. I looked at
their web page and it's only $350 per server (any number of users). If it
works that sound very reasonable.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday,
7635 8378
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Alverson, Tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 30 October 2003 14:53
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam
filtering.
Let us all know what you
You are going to be introducing a lot of changes by doing this.
Let me give you a piece of advise. Put the Xwall on a separate box.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:15 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject:
POP, if I'm not mistaken, uses port 110.
Users mail could potentially get marked as spam I would think as they will
be sending through the smtp connector. Someone please correct me if I'm
wrong.
-K-
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent:
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off-topic changing SMTP port on Exchange for spam filtering.
POP, if I'm not mistaken, uses port 110.
Users mail could potentially get marked as spam I would think as they will
be sending through the smtp connector. Someone please correct me if I'm
wrong.
-K
As far as DNS is concerned, yes. As far as AD is concerned, no. You'd
need to create a trust.
Jason
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 2:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic
Hi Guys,
Is it possible to have an
Not exactly.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:01 PM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Off topic
Subject: Off topic
Hi Guys,
Is it possible to have an active directory domain as a child domain
under a master NT4 domain?
Thanks, that's what I thought.
-Original Message-
From: Chris Scharff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, September 05, 2003 1:05 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic
Not exactly.
-Original Message-
From: Pillai, Raj [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted
much
clearer now.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:24 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
I said Mailfrontier not Matador
Why yes. Yes he did.
-Original Message-
From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 28, 2003 11:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Chris Scharff wrote:
Mailfrontier is the name of the company. They have two
.
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution.
Its even cheap!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM
To: Exchange
I said Mailfrontier not Matador.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Chris Scharff
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 10:28 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Yeah, I was real impressed
.
-Original Message-
From: Woodruff, Michael [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Thursday, August 28, 2003 6:24 AM
Posted To: swynk
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
I said Mailfrontier not Matador.
-Original
There have been lots of posts floating around stating that Osirusoft
finally decided to call it quits and as a last measure, they blacklisted
everyone. The newsgroup post I saw stated that everyone was recommended
to stop using relays.osirusoft.com
Ben Winzenz
Network Engineer
Gardner White
Can everyone actually do that then? I want to get my mails through
-Original Message-
From: Ben Winzenz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: woensdag 27 augustus 2003 19:40
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
There have been lots of posts
Use Mailfrontier. I can't imagine a better anti-spam solution.
Its even cheap!
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kim Schotanus
Sent: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 1:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft
Gardner White
(317) 581-1580 ext 418
-Original Message-
From: Kim Schotanus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Posted At: Wednesday, August 27, 2003 12:44 PM
Posted To: Exchange (Swynk)
Conversation: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world.
Subject: RE: Off Topic-Osirusoft Blacklist the world
It was from Microsoft KB. I'm not finding the article right now, but
that's how I figured out what the problem was. I'll continue searching
if you want.
-Chris
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lynne July
Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 12:54
Let me clarify a little. We have sender notification off. We have
recipient on. All recipients received the message notification and not just
the users on Exchange.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (pfeffepe) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 11, 2003 4:17 PM
List info : http://www.activedir.org/mail_list.htm
List FAQ: http://www.activedir.org/list_faq.htm
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 28, 2003 8:40 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: **OFF TOPIC**: Active Directory
W2k server or active directory?
-Original Message-
From: Dirk du Plooy - CPX Mngd Services
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 5:24 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List?
Thanks
Dirk du Plooy
msnews.microsoft.com
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Dirk du Plooy -
CPX Mngd Services
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 7:34 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
Anybody know about a godd W2K Server List?
WINNT-L
http://peach.ease.lsoft.com/archives/winnt-l.html
-Kevin
-Original Message-
From: Dirk du Plooy - CPX Mngd Services
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Posted At: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 4:24 AM
Posted To: Exchange
Conversation: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
Subject: Off
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Glenn Sullivan, MCSE+I MCDBA
David Clark Company Inc.
-Original Message-
From: Public Folder: Exchange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, February 11, 2003 1:01 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Off Topic: W2K Server List?
WINNT
Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my recovery
box), the backup tape drive on the recovery system will not
recognize the any tapes from the other systems. I put the
tape in and I get use cleaning tape. Looked at drivers
I may be the DLT driver.
- Original Message -
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:06 PM
Subject: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
Somewhat off topic.
We recently upgraded our servers to Windows
You may be the driver?? Well, you must be very busy, making sure all the DLT's run
correctly!
:-)
Alex
Tony Hlabse wrote:
| I may be the DLT driver.
|
| - Original Message -
| From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Sent:
OK OK. Well it seems many problems with DLT tape drives not working
correctly are the drivers.
- Original Message -
From: Alexander Wall [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 18, 2002 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: Off topic DLT 7000 restore.
You
After upgrading the boxes to 2000 SP3 (including my recovery
box), the backup tape drive on the recovery system will not
recognize the any tapes from the other systems. I put the
tape in and I get use cleaning tape. Looked at drivers and
I don't know if it's related, but I remember some
hehe - Not to mention the probability that there arent any storage limits on
that folder!
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 7:48 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
I don't understand how a public folder rule
Mongo let replies out to Internet.
-Original Message-
From: Cohen, Bret [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
Set up a rule that reply's with a preset message and / or attachments
Bret Cohen
Viacom Information
-Original Message-
From: Ed Crowley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 25 June 2002 00:48
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
I don't understand how a public folder rule is any less
susceptable to mail loops than an inbox rule.
I think we're back to closing our
copied and pasted
Create a distribution list (using Exchange Adminstrator) and a public folder
(using Outlook)
In Exchange Administrator set the email address for the public folder to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Add the public folder as a member of the distribution list. (In Exchange
Administrator,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ed Crowley
Sent: Tuesday, June 25, 2002 4:44 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off-Topic Question
It's all or none.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP kcCC+I
Tech Consultant
hp Services
Protecting the world from
www.cdolive.com
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic
I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they
receive
resumes
from outside the company.
In-Box rule?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald
B.
Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic
I'm trying to setup an auto reply for our HR dept to use when they receive
resumes
from outside the
Check http://www.cdolive.com/code.htm
--
Martin Tuip
MVP Exchange
Exchange 2000 List owner
www.exchange-mail.org
www.sharepointserver.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
- Original Message -
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange
, June 24, 2002 2:13 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
In-Box rule?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Pennell, Ronald
B.
Sent: 24 June 2002 21:49
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic
I'm trying to setup an auto reply
Use a PF with a rule on it Works better. Then give only HR dept. appropriate
access.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 6:44 PM
Subject: RE: Off Topic
But that will likely end up in constant
]] On Behalf Of Tony Hlabse
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 4:29 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Re: Off Topic
Use a PF with a rule on it Works better. Then give only HR dept.
appropriate access.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Crowley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Exchange Discussions [EMAIL
Set up a rule that reply's with a preset message and / or attachments
Bret Cohen
Viacom Information Services and Technology
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-Original Message-
From: Pennell, Ronald B. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, June 24, 2002 1:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
From TechNet disable Task Manager search
- To disable the TASK MANAGER button, create the following value in the
registry:
NOTE: The System key may need to be created.
HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\Microsoft\Windows\CurrentVersion
\Policies\System\
Fortres 101 Version 4.1
http://www.fortres.com/
Mike
--- Charles Carerros [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I was told that there might be a way to keep the CTRL-ALT-DEL and/or
task manager from canceling an .exe or .bat file.
Does anyone know where I can find a way to do this with Windows 2000
In their login scripts add lines like:
del %USERPROFILE%\local settings\file1
del %USERPROFILE%\local settings\file2
-Original Message-
From: Derrick Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 2:18 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic - Seeking
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002 4:26 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Seeking Auotmation Method: SMS, Scripts, etc.
In their login scripts add lines like:
del %USERPROFILE%\local settings\file1
del %USERPROFILE%\local settings\file2
-Original
Have you looked at www.myITforum.com? This is Rod Trent's web site for all
things SMS. Rod is to SMS, what Daniel, Missy, The Ed's, The Andy's, et al,
are to Exchange.
Jim Blunt
-Original Message-
From: Derrick Stevenson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, March 27, 2002
Speak to your firewall administrator?
-Original Message-
From: Van Huissteden, Adriaan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 21, 2002 5:53 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic-- Open Network Ports (161 162)
Hi,
I need to open and allow ports 161
Explanation: RPC is cool.
-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 9:57 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic - Encryption
I am quite new to Exchange and Exchange Clients like Outlook.
We are using Exchange
Bill,
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/
html/NT4_0Encryption.asp
(link may wrap)
makes a good read about this. You are getting encryption free of charge with
RPC.
--
be - MOS
I remember a bigger, older guy we called Dad. We'd eat some stuff, or
Bill,
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Bill,
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnw2kmag01/
html
I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...
-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Bill,
Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: East, Bill [mailto:[EMAIL
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...
-Original Message-
From: William Rettig [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:17 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Bill,
Thank you
Y'all are brutal. Get me out of here...
-Original Message-
From: Mood, Steve [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 4:25 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Oh, let's hope not.
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Miller [mailto
http://www.lilbill.net/index.html
William
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 1:19 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
I'm just a bill, yes I'm only a bill...
-Original Message-
From
Not that bill, this bill:
http://www.apocalypse.org/pub/u/gilly/Schoolhouse_Rock/HTML/history/bill.htm
l
Amateur.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 2:57 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
, 2002 5:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Not that bill, this bill:
http://www.apocalypse.org/pub/u/gilly/Schoolhouse_Rock/HTML/history/bill
.htm
l
Amateur.
-Original Message-
From: Lefkovics, William [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17
I have that one on Laserdisc. One of the best.
Tom.
-Original Message-
From: Jennifer Baker [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 17, 2002 8:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic - Encryption
Not that bill, this bill:
http://www.apocalypse.org/pub/u/gilly
Have you re-applied sp4?
Regards
Mr Louis Joyce
Network Support Analyst
Exchange Administrator
BT Ignite eSolutions
-Original Message-
From: Olivier de Heer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: 11 January 2002 14:36
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: Message Number 54101 (was
No, I didn't. Do I have to re-install SP$?
Regards,
Olivier
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives: http://www.swynk.com/sitesearch/search.asp
To unsubscribe:
Subject: RE: Off topic: Message Number 54101 (was Connector for Lotus
Note s)
No, I didn't. Do I have to re-install SP$?
Regards,
Olivier
_
List posting FAQ: http://www.swinc.com/resource/exch_faq.htm
Archives
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have no experience with Surfcontrol's E-mail filter, but I can tell
that there Superscout webfilter product has some serious issues.. It
can be bypassed with easily.. This bug was brought to their
attention, released to the Bugtraq comunity and
I'm running only MAPI mode and I can't get the notifications to come to me
either. When I try a test at the server I get a MAPI error. I installed an
old Exchange mapi client and that didn't help. I made sure there was a
valid scanmail profile on the server and that didn't help. Trend wanted
Under Notification, Real Time Scan, You need to put your name in ScanMail
Administrators. Then you will get emails whenever a virus is nailed.
As for the other with the AVAPI, this is a limitation of the AVAPI. My
suggestion would be to use Scanmail 3.7x which uses ESE based scanning.
: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 10:31 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
Under Notification, Real Time Scan, You need to put your name in ScanMail
Administrators. Then you will get emails whenever a virus is nailed.
As for the other with the AVAPI
That could also be another limitation of the AVAPI, but I cant remember
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 7:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing
I don't use the avapi but for mapi mode that is a check box.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 9:45 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
I get
m
Box of Checks...
-Original Message-
From: Hunter, Lori [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: ScanMail AVAPI notifications and tracing?
I don't use the avapi but for mapi mode that is a check box
Not sure about Scanmail having the file locked but have you tried del or
attrib from a DOS prompt?
Allan
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE
Try logging out and back in and then deleting.
Tom
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 11:23 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
This is going to be a little off topic, but
If you try to delete it from DOS, it still is locked but it doesn't take
EXPLORER.EXE up to 100% utilization.
-Original Message-
From: Allan Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
why dont you stop the services for trend and then delete the file. After
all that just start up the services again.
-Original Message-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic
-
From: Pfefferkorn, Pete (PFEFFEPE) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:41 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
If you try to delete it from DOS, it still is locked but it doesn't take
EXPLORER.EXE up to 100% utilization
I'm going to during non-prime time. It took me a couple of days to track
down why this was occuring.
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 12:50 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic: EXPLORER.EXE 100% CPU
why
I agree with Joe. Go get ERD Commander now and it will save you gobs of
time in the future... it is priced quite reasonable.
Aaron
-Original Message-
From: Bauschek, Joe [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 5:02 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: off topic
I posted some stuff earlier that touched on this subject. I too was
impacted by the ATT tragedy. However, I am using the @Business service and
was told that it was a independant of ATT @ Home Service. However, I was
not aware that they were using Excite as a portal either.
Anyway I've had
I hear he's pretty quick off the snap.
Ed Crowley MCSE+I MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer
There are seldom good technological solutions to behavioral problems.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of jojo.solis
Sent: Tuesday, December 04,
:27 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories:
Fathers can be hard to please. That's why I stopped making my father
blended concoctions of ground turkey, Hershey's syrup, milk, paprika,
and canned pears. I only bake brownies and cakes for the whole family
nowadays
: William Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 12:49 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories:
I think that would be OT: Turkey shake Was: W3SVC? Directories.
I vehemently object to your email - what's with the paprika
Seielstad [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:30 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories:
I would violently object to his email, but only if I had to eat what it
describes...
Roger
--
Roger D
May I suggest that the words 'off topic' or OT be used somewhere in the
subject line for messages that aren't related to a particular Exchange
discussion. Also, as an added extra, the subject could contain the previous
topic as 'Was: previous topic'. Makes it easier to sort.
Thanks,
Bill
Naw, too much work.
-Original Message-
From: William Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:16 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories:
May I suggest that the words 'off topic' or OT be used somewhere in the
subject
]] On Behalf Of Andy David
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 6:45 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off topic was: W3SVC? Directories:
Naw, too much work.
-Original Message-
From: William Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 28, 2001 7:16 PM
To: Exchange
troll..
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html
~steve
Does anyone know a good program or books for making good
stationery HTML for
outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email BABY!!
Rich
_
List posting FAQ:
lol
Those are pretty funny...
-Original Message-
From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda
troll..
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html
~steve
Does anyone know a good
http://www.netgain.co.nz/egypt.htm
http://dspace.dial.pipex.com/town/close/gi45/egypt/papyrus.htm
Main Entry: sta·tio·nery
Pronunciation: 'stA-sh-ner-E
Function: noun
Etymology: stationer
Date: circa 1688
1 : materials (as paper, pens, and ink) for writing or typing
2 : letter paper usually
HTML email is fun.
But... not practical for most uses.
http://www.expita.com/nomime.html
Try an Outlook forum...
William
-Original Message-
From: Tener, Richard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:39 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: Off Topic Kinda
Ignore my pointless off topic I like the pictures better. I think I found
almost every one in this discussion board in that website.
-Original Message-
From: Andy David [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:07 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic
Are you sure he's not a target? There is a fine line between the two!
-Original Message-
From: Steve Hanna [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 12:58 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda
troll..
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html
They do look both ways. Up and down.
-Original Message-
From: Barry Patterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:52 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda
Wondering:
Do trolls look both ways before crossing the street?
Or do they ask
that I am responsible for one more increment
in this thread. C'est la vie..
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 1:12 PM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda
Are you sure he's
uh uh Garble/Net Rat
-Original Message-
From: Monteleone-Haught Matt - Millville
To: Exchange Discussions
Sent: 10/31/01 12:11 PM
Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda
Are you sure he's not a target? There is a fine line between the two!
-Original Message-
From: Steve Hanna [mailto
PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 11:58 AM
To: Exchange Discussions
Subject: RE: Off Topic Kinda
troll..
http://www.winternet.com/~mikelr/flame29.html
~steve
Does anyone know a good program or books for making good
stationery HTML for
outlook 2000. I want to make some fancy email
You can do this pretty easily with perl. Use the Net::rexec module or the
Net::Telnet module and then compile with perl2exe.
===
Andy Webb[EMAIL PROTECTED] www.swinc.com
Simpler-Webb, Inc. Austin, TX512-322-0071
Good stationery
Oxymoron.
Ed Crowley MCSE+Internet MVP
Tech Consultant
Compaq Computer Corporation (soon to be HP)
All your base are belong to us.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Tener, Richard
Sent: Wednesday, October 31, 2001 9:39 AM
http://www.5star-shareware.com/Utilities/General/keytext.html or search on
keytext.
Keytext is a very robust macro and keyboard stroke recorder. You can
record keystrokes, mouse movements, left and right clicks and double
clicks too.
Mike
Hi all
do you know of any Freeware telnet or
I don't think it would be a good idea to have a unix superuser password
in a batch file (text). A program that does macros and could scramble
the info would be the way to go.
Hi all
do you know of any Freeware telnet or similar product that will let me
to
automate the following in a batch
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
