Robert Blayzor wrote:
On Dec 14, 2012, at 4:45 AM, Jeremy Harris j...@wizmail.org wrote:
Just do stuff in the mail acl, based on the server_set_id.
I was hoping that I could expand and then extract/set values from the
lookup query we use for the server_condition (and/or server_set_id)
to
soumya tr wrote:
Hi,
I tried using 'acl_m' variable, but no luck.
The idea I used is like set acl_m_8 = 0 when a condition is satisfied. But
it just says permission denied for the particular file :(.
Exim's config file parser thinks you have specified a filename.
As Reads : acl_m_8
Should
soumya tr wrote:
Hi all,
Thanks for your update.
I guess I have found the reason for exim not using the required router. Its
because the headers are added only after the correct router is identified.
Thus the condition I am using will not work.:(
Is there any other way to achieve this? I am
The Doctor wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 04:34:12PM +0100, Jan Ingvoldstad wrote:
On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 4:13 PM, The Doctor doc...@doctor.nl2k.ab.cawrote:
What if the client is outside the LAN??
Uhm, there is only a problem if the client is sending outside the LAN, so
those are exacty
Mike Ridgers wrote:
Dear all, Further to my last message I will attempt to distil my
question as much as possible as I think it was perhaps not very clear
what I was asking:
Clear enough. An answer is less so.
IF/AS/WHEN the 'fixup' were to be applied at compile-time, or in a
'MAIN' setting
The Doctor wrote:
On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 05:17:04PM +, Always Learning wrote:
On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 09:18 -0700, The Doctor wrote:
You can use tnef to extract winmail.dat and then replace the contents
accordingly.
Why would any person using open-source and free Exim want to start
Always Learning wrote:
Readers around the world may not understand mungeth nada or the
Dragons or out (Hi Graeme) so using simplified jargon-less English
aids universal understanding :-)
Happy Christmas to everyone.
Proverbially preserving petrified politicized PC pathways provides poor
l...@lena.kiev.ua wrote:
From: M2C
Is there a way to limit outgoing emails for each authenticated user (LOGIN
AUTH) in exim?. For example, 100 mails per day for User1 and 200 mails per
day for User2.
What is the goal of the limit - impeding outgoing spam?
Simple ratelimits are better than
Phil Pennock wrote:
On 2012-11-17 at 16:42 +0200, l...@lena.kiev.ua wrote:
Below I explain in detail (for novices at Exim) what to change in
Exim config for automatic blocking of compromised and spammers' accounts,
with automatic email notification to abuse or support staff.
This code also
Marc Perkel wrote:
Just wondering - has anyone found an easy way to look inside a .zip
attachment with Exim to get a list of the files contained inside?
Marc,
Been leavin' that bit to ClamAV for Donkey's Years..
If it doesn't see a problem, there seldom IS one.
Any similar need best
Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Wed, 2012-10-03 at 13:02 +0100, paul.osbo...@canterbury.ac.uk wrote:
As part of the process I intend to shutdown SMTP on mailstoreA in order
to force mail to queue on my Exim routing host - this I am happy with.
OK, but...
However changing the mailstore requires
Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Tue, 2012-09-18 at 12:42 +0200, Cyborg wrote:
Where is the big advantage over ...
- a _local_ mysql database auth ?
- a mysql database server _at all_ ?
If your organisation already has a large, embedded, well-documented,
well-managed, well-understood LDAP directory
Always Learning wrote:
...are routed
to :blackhole:
Have to caution against accepting then blackholing.
Some of the miscreants DO take note and score, so that an acceptance
earns a pile-on of MORE garbage, and sustained rejections or
'unreachables' (IP FW'ed) earn a go-elsewhere as you
Ron White wrote:
When someone uses a public list and attacks you with crazy
accusations, abuse or sarcasm there has to be some right to defend it.
No. There is not.
Long established principal in Common law that in a Court of Equity
both parties must have 'clean hands'.
Which is not the
Always Learning wrote:
We want to block all emails sent from spamming servers like Microsoft
ESMTP Mail Service.
In ACL HELO how can one match the data in the HELO/EHLO line ? I want
to match 'Microsoft ESMTP MAIL Service' and then drop or reject the
connection.
220 galsrv1.galvatech.local
Always Learning wrote:
What I ideally sought was a once-off solution. Your interesting regext
examines all the headers in the DATA ACL. I was seeking something which
examines the incoming HELO line in the HELO ACL.
That can be done, but may get dodgier.
Turn 'log_selector' up to noisey and
Always Learning wrote:
On Sun, 2012-09-02 at 22:47 +0200, Lorens Kockum wrote:
The exact same question was sent by someone calling himself Sam
Jones to the postfix mailing list at almost exactly the same
time. Peddling one's services by soliciting comparisons with
competitors is so passé . . .
Lorens Kockum wrote:
The exact same question was sent by someone calling himself Sam
Jones to the postfix mailing list at almost exactly the same
time. Peddling one's services by soliciting comparisons with
competitors is so passé . . .
Sure hope he convinces more of the parasite-classes to
Dave Lugo wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, W B Hacker wrote:
Lorens Kockum wrote:
The exact same question was sent by someone calling himself Sam
Jones to the postfix mailing list at almost exactly the same
time. Peddling one's services by soliciting comparisons with
competitors is so pass
Dave Lugo wrote:
On Sun, 2 Sep 2012, W B Hacker wrote:
--snip--
If I was a member of your user community, I'd be a bit upset at some of
the spam filtering decisions you're making for me. Your mileage does
vary, apparently.
Business system, so the problem would never have arisen.
Most
Always Learning wrote:
Does one have to place the socket number in clamd.sock or will Exim or
Clam do that automatically after the first AV check ?
They must, of course, agree as to the name and dirtree, and both must
have the perms to use it.
I choose to start all of the 'support'
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
On 8/17/12, W B Hacker w...@conducive.org wrote:
Sorry but googling didn't give up a relevant meaning of LBL. What is
it and how is that configured in exim?
Local Black List as opposed to Remote Black List.
EG: 'LBL' is the one you do not have to make an off
Emmanuel Noobadmin wrote:
Every so frequently, I get users who complain that their emails are
getting rejected for unknown reasons by Barracuda. In almost all of
these cases, no blacklists apart from Barracuda indicates there was
any spamming/backscatter etc from the server in question. Since
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Wed, 2012-07-25 at 07:57 +, W B Hacker wrote:
Greylisting, OTOH, gets 'in your face' when broadly applied.
I can't see playing the game where one smacks legit arrivals on first
sight just on general principle, then - 'maybe' - is kind enough to
whitelist those who
David Woodhouse wrote:
On Tue, 2012-07-24 at 09:55 -0400, Chris Knadle wrote:
However I don't see anything in the implementation about RDNS or SPF.
It's not in the implementation. If it appeared, it would be one of the
examples in the 'Setting the conditions for suspicious mail' section.
As
Robert Blayzor wrote:
When using Exim to pull domainlists, say:
domainlist db_localdoms = pgsql; domainlist
db_relaydoms = pgsql; domainlist db_backlisted
= pgsql;
We use the above referenced domainlists extensively throughout the
Exim mail routing and ACL's,
Todd Lyons wrote:
Please keep all replies on list.
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 9:32 AM, Nguyen Quanminhquan...@gmail.com wrote:
But in the #1 I don't know how to configure the transport to do a mysql
query which inserts the appropriate data.
Can you help me a little more?
Maybe someone else
Jethro R Binks wrote:
I have:
DELAY_SMTP_RCPT_FIRST = 30s
DELAY_SMTP_DATA = 30s
Having started with progressive delays that went into multiple-minutes,
we eventually found that a mere 13s delay would cause well over 90% of
all 'bots that were going to abandon of their own volition AT ALL
Lars Nielsen wrote:
Lars Nielsen wrote:
Hi List,
I am developing a php-based webservice with which i want to control and
manage exim from a web-gui.
What is the best and most secure way to control Exim from a php-script?
Some issue can be configured via a database but i still need to call
Ferenc Wagner wrote:
Hi,
reason for this, were they omitted by mistake or do I overlook something?
Given that Exim can be told in as fine a granularity as can be imagined
*where* to seek all manner of certs to match, I suspect you are looking
at the simplest general case, and not at the
Lars Nielsen wrote:
Hi List,
I am developing a php-based webservice with which i want to control and
manage exim from a web-gui.
What is the best and most secure way to control Exim from a php-script?
Some issue can be configured via a database but i still need to call the
exim executable some
Adam Bradley wrote:
I have a situation where email delivered to a single namespace needs to be
delivered to a user who could be in one of a number of downstream system
(but we don't know which one). I was wondering if I could use Callback
Verification
Ron White wrote:
I'm struggling with a bit of a logical problem and I want to make sure I
approach it the right way.
Currently I'm putting together a back up relay/server that will host
about six low use domains.
I've managed to get it up and working in skeleton form - it accepts mail
for
Klaus Ethgen wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Hello folks,
I have a small problem with errors_to. I have to send errors for several
mails to a special address. That work fine using the errors_to setting.
But the errors_to also set the envelope-from to the respective
Andreas Metzler wrote:
*snip specifics, query as to general*
IMHO the
solution in GIT (keep 1024 limit, but add tls_dh_min_bits SMTP transport
option) is perfectly fine. Which is why we have applied the patch
to Debian's exim package.
cu andreas
Andreas,
I have no horse in this race, but
exim-us...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
On 08/06/12 03:51, Mehma Sarja wrote:
I suppose theoretically you could have a webmail app
which reads mail directly from a Maildir folder rather than connecting
to an IMAP service, but I'm not aware of any.
There are several, actually.
But a solid
l...@lena.kiev.ua wrote:
Webmail is slow but doesn't consume expensive memory (VPS) when idle.
Primary access is via POP3 and POP3S, webmail is for emergencies.
MOST webmail are indeed slow. Has more to do with http than the
mailstore, though.
Prayer caches and manages that so well there
Todd Lyons wrote:
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:13 AM,exim-us...@lists.grepular.com wrote:
server like Exim. I suppose theoretically you could have a webmail app
which reads mail directly from a Maildir folder rather than connecting
to an IMAP service, but I'm not aware of any.
Courier SQWebmail
:13 +
From: W B Hacker w...@conducive.org
To: exim users exim-users@exim.org
Not a direct answer to your question, but hopefully a more
efficient way to eliminate it.
You might find this easier to maintain as it needeth not editing
of the configure file.
deny
condition = \
${lookup
Jim Pazarena wrote:
I created the following:
deny message = We don't want your spam! Go away!
log_message = blacklisted at ~pool-ukrtel.net reject
condition = \
${if \
{match{${lc:$sender_host_name}}{.pool.ukrtel.net}} \
{true}{false}}
and it fails with the following log line:
2012-06-06
Muhammad Irfan wrote:
Well, my objective no one from outside world can connect to our mail server
and sends bulk emails by using our domain email address. e.g.
a...@example.com in case if this account is compromised.
A compromised UID:PWD is compromised. SMTP or any other thing.
Full stop.
Ed wrote:
I have installed exim on a Centos linode, its purpose to is send mail
reports generated by admin shell scripts.
So, my domain is foo.com however all email for foo.com is handled by
Google Apps. When I try to send email to m...@foo.com it stays in the
queue frozen, I can send email to
George R. Kasica wrote:
I have no idea why you consider exim rapidly evolving FLOSS
software...its basic structure and functions are not greatly changed
since V 2-3x with exception of the scripting language changes in I
think it was the start of the 3.6x series. And even then unless you
did
Muhammad Irfan wrote:
I had situation in past when one of my domain POP3/SMTP user/pass
compromised.
And someone connect to our server (SMTP) with that user account to send
bulk of emails.
I need to eliminate this sort of spam mechanism like in case if account
compromised no one can send emails
Folks,
With setting just the exim user and group, in src/EDITME and moving into
Local/Makefile, Exim 4.80 built from source in a little under 38
wall-clock seconds.
Thinkpad T60p, OpenBSD 5.1 GENERIC.MP#255 i386
I am retiring, will not be updating, so have neither installed nor
tested the
George R. Kasica wrote:
On Mon, 4 Jun 2012 20:02:03 -0700, you wrote:
On Mon, Jun 4, 2012 at 7:39 PM, Phil Pennockexim-us...@spodhuis.org wrote:
You need to remove the build directory, and/or make makefile after
making changes to how Exim is built.
George, you can do 'make distclean'
George R. Kasica wrote:
*rationalizations snipped*
Fer hem's sake, George, why fight it?
- just install a virtualizer. They're free.
Keep yer old gnarly 'cannot be upgraded' stuff in the image of wot you
have now, and put a new, clean, cohesive - and also free - install onto
another image
Marc Haber wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2012 15:44:07 -0700, Mike Lyonmike.l...@gmail.com
wrote:
Mike needed more coffee today..
Thank you all for your help!
crawls back into cave
Will anybody who has ever fooled itself into thinking that some remote
site was at fault while the real problem was a
Mike Lyon wrote:
Howdy,
I know this isn't an exim related question but it's affecting the ability
for my exim install to deliver email... Anyways, It appears when my exim
install tries to deliver email to Google or Yahoo, both of them refuse the
port 25 connection from my host. I went to
Todd Lyons wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Mike Lyonmike.l...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I have the forward and reverse IPs matching. Don't have any MX
records for that specific domain set-up because I don't have any inbound
mail setup for that domain (nor do I want it).
Set up an MX
Костырев Александр Алексеевич wrote:
Hello!
Does anybody know how to stop immediate delivery when number of mails
in queue has reached certain limit (e.g. 1200)?
I don't want to limit number of simultaneous SMTP connections or
system load just number of mails in queue
Is it possible?
Laurent Rahuel wrote:
Hi,
I know this has been asked many times but none of my googling requests
gave a suitable answer.
I wan't to get rid of Return-Path and Sender rewriting when an email is
send via an authenticated connexion.
Sending email via my smtp on port 25 without authentication will
Todd Lyons wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Laurent Rahuel
laurent.rah...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I know this has been asked many times but none of my googling requests gave
a suitable answer.
I wan't to get rid of Return-Path and Sender rewriting when an email is send
via an
Laurent Rahuel wrote:
Hi,
I know this has been asked many times but none of my googling requests
gave a suitable answer.
I wan't to get rid of Return-Path and Sender rewriting when an email is
send via an authenticated connexion.
Sending email via my smtp on port 25 without authentication
Laurent Rahuel wrote:
Le 31 mai 2012 à 21:24, Todd Lyons a écrit :
On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 5:59 AM, Laurent Rahuel
laurent.rah...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I know this has been asked many times but none of my googling requests gave
a suitable answer.
I wan't to get rid of Return-Path and Sender
Brian Spraker wrote:
Hi all -
Another question for the group.
I've increasingly been rejecting good messages and am trying to find
out why. However, when looking at the rejectlog, it mentions why it
was rejected (spam points) - but it doesn't show me how the e-mail
qualified with that many
Brian Spraker wrote:
*snip*
I definitely would prefer to use SA's logging for this so it is a
separate log away from Exim. I just can't seem to find anything
about how to do so.
Dunno what OS you are running, but back when I still bothered to run SA
at all, a *BSD install left SA logging
eximmail wrote:
I have started seeing these weird characters in a couple of emails. On
this list anything W B Hacker sends I can't read his mail at all! I have
to go to the board to read them. This just started in the last week or
so and I am at a loss as to why it is happening at all. This also
Janne Snabb wrote:
On 2012-05-17 11:09, W B Hacker wrote:
Before I did ANYTHING else I'd rename all of the 'X-Spamwotever'
headers you add to something unique to your own server.
Many a Sysadmin has chased ghosts that turned out to be the same
header-names already present on the *incoming
Nuno Sucena Almeida wrote:
On 05/17/2012 12:09 AM, W B Hacker wrote:
Might not solve the problem - but at least you'll know if it IS your
problem.
Hi Bill,
I do have my own specific site headers and check through them, I just
removed them from the post since it's just a minor change.
As you
Nuno Sucena Almeida wrote:
On 05/08/2012 10:44 AM, Nuno Sucena Almeida wrote:
On 05/08/2012 04:39 AM, Phil Pennock wrote:
What's the ACL logic involved? The relevant stanzas from your
configuration file would be useful to see here.
Hi Phil,
I'm not sure I understand what you mean by the ACL
Todd Lyons wrote:
A guy came in to the #exim IRC channel today and asked what seemed
like a simple question, but I couldn't figure out a way to make it
work.
He has a file that's used for mapping domain names to a relay server.
For example:
# cat test.conf
domain.com: 192.168.1.8
todd.com:
Lennart Ackermans wrote:
Aah, I was incorrectly assuming before that the smtp daemon would take care
of sending all outgoing emails. (As a sidenote, is there not some logic in
my way of thinking: why would a program so complex allow setuid as root?)
Short answer is so it can:
A) Grab the
Daniele Gallarato wrote:
thanks a lot, it works great!!
Daniele Gallarato
.. and (hopefully) after a short while to settle what you actually WANT
to accept, you'll modify or even disable it.
Problem with running a catch-all is that it not only collects
spam/malware - it sort of encourages
Lennart Ackermans wrote:
Hi,
I'm trying to share a single Exim smtp daemon on the host node on multiple
virtual servers (openvz containers). Users in containers should only be
able to send emails. What I have done so far is sharing the mail spool
directory on the host node with all containers.
Dave Lugo wrote:
On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Moritz Wilhelmy wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2012 at 11:31:23 -0600, Mike Kennedy wrote:
From the Exim Documentation:
After the ?rst hyphen, the next six characters are the id of the
process
that received the message.
The process ID of the exim process that
Hub Dohmen wrote:
Spammers are abusing our system by sending fake bounces to our server,
that Exim#39;returns#39; to the#39;sender#39;.
How can ik ignore, of better, delete before accepting.
I do two simple things:
First - DON'T ACCEPT a 'bounce' from a source that lacks
Antonio Leding wrote:
Hi Heiko,
Thanks very much for this information - so two more questions for you and the
community:
1) It seems that ACL is faster when compared to TRANSP?ORT - is this true?
It isn't about 'faster'. SA takes orders of magnitude more time than
wotever Exim is doing.
Ian Eiloart wrote:
On 7 Feb 2012, at 09:02, W B Hacker wrote:
Don't GENERATE bounces to off-box 'strangers'. At all. Allow ONLY
'DSN' to your own 'local' user pool, virtual or shell.
Actually, I don't see why you shouldn't do that
?? Seems fairly obvious that if 100% of rejections from
Ian Eiloart wrote:
On 7 Feb 2012, at 16:48, Antonio Leding wrote:
Hi Heiko,
Thanks very much for this information - so two more questions for
you and the community:
1) It seems that ACL is faster when compared to TRANSP?ORT - is
this true?
ACLs are Access Control Lists that chiefly
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
From: Odhiambo Washington [mailto:odhia...@gmail.com] Sent:
Wednesday, January 11, 2012 11:28 PM To: Murray S. Kucherawy Cc:
exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] milter?
What is this milter?
Is it better than Exiscan, which is already part of Exim core?
I don’t
Murray S. Kucherawy wrote:
-Original Message- From:
exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org
[mailto:exim-users-bounces+msk=cloudmark@exim.org] On Behalf Of
Jeremy Harris Sent: Wednesday, January 11, 2012 4:28 PM To:
exim-users@exim.org Subject: Re: [exim] Including state
Dean Bishop wrote:
Hey All,
It's been pointed out to me that I have not been following
protocol by top-posting rather than adding my comments inline or at the
bottom of messages. Apologies. It's been quite a while since I've used
a mailing list as forums have pretty much taken over.
Dean Bishop wrote:
*snip*
The one outstanding issue is the duplication of
outgoing archived messages when a message is sent from a local
account to a local alias.
Interesting. Dig deeper.
Exim can tell - or be allowed to find out - the difference.
You can use that to craft the router you
Dean Bishop wrote:
Hey Bill,
A great question. Sadly not one that I have an answer to. Half of
this battle is trying to sift through cPanel's stock exim.conf which
is extraordinarily convoluted (at least to me). I know that there
are a thousand config combinations and permutations available
paul cooper wrote:
My ISP limits me to 150 emails/hr (even through their cpanel mailman
application!)
i would like to add a delay =30 secs to my own exim config so i can deal
with the mailing list 'in house'
Im using ubuntu server + exim.
Its not clear (to me) where and how to configure the
Todd Lyons wrote:
On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 3:38 AM, Dean Bishopdbis...@rocksolidhq.com wrote:
Thanks Todd,
I kinda figured that this was the basic problem. It makes perfect
sense but I just cannot seem to find the correct place to put my archiving
routers. Would you mind having a
ahmad riza h nst wrote:
dear all,
how can i inject email to all local/virtual users on multiple domains ?
i can do it with vpopbull on vpopmail, but how to do it on exim/cpanel?
please help, thank you.
--
You might find the day-to-day use easier if you install a decent Mailing
List
Juan Bernhard wrote:
Hi all, does anyone knows how to disable bounce message of any type of
error (permament or temporary)?
I have a small smtp list server running exim, and ill pretend to send a
bounce report on a cron job to few senders, instead the exim generated
bounce message.
Thanks. Juan
mark david mcCreary wrote:
On 11/3/11 9:31 PM, W B Hacker wrote:
m...@mccreary.com wrote:
I'm up to Exim 4.71 with Ubuntu Lucid.
I've got some procmail jobs that send out email using Exim, as a named
system user.
:0
|/usr/sbin/exim4 -f liai...@mail-list.com $SUBSCRIBER
In this example
Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 14:02 -0400, m...@mccreary.com wrote:
The body of the email being sent out contains headers like this
From Debian-exim Thu Nov 3 02:27:45 2011
Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2011 22:27:26 EDT
MIME-Version: 1.0
m...@mccreary.com wrote:
I'm up to Exim 4.71 with Ubuntu Lucid.
I've got some procmail jobs that send out email using Exim, as a named
system user.
:0
|/usr/sbin/exim4 -f liai...@mail-list.com $SUBSCRIBER
In this example, the user is liaison
no@o2.pl wrote:
Hello
I would like to ask, if this is possible to force exim to load files with
whitelist IPs into memory.
Currently I've setup
hosts my_whitelist = net-iplsearch;/etc/my_whitelist
and I access this via
!hosts = +my_witelist
but when I check stat of file
no@o2.pl wrote:
I thought that it could be possible to load lsearch file into memory
like exim.conf etc is loaded into memory.
So I see that it is not possible, if I properly understand your statement.
Mike.
Quite the reverse.
It is not only POSSIBLE, it is probably *automatic* and
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
W B Hacker, 2011-10-31 05:15:
Jakob, had this been written in Deutsch, I'd not be presuming to tell
you about *my* dificulty understanding that language.
Again, I don't know what you are trying to tell me.
+1
Bill
--
韓家標
--
## List details at https://lists.exim.org
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
On 28.10.2011 11:07, W B Hacker wrote:
Jakob, had this been written in Deutsch, I'd not be presuming to tell
you about *my* dificulty understanding that language.
A triggered 'accept' is not 'permanent' until end of DATA. Period.
A triggered 'deny' class verb
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
W B Hacker, 2011-10-27 13:41:
Works that way here...
'Course I DO run acl's on ALL phases of the smtp session, so...
... an 'accept' ain't final 'til the Fat Lady sings (end of DATA phase..)
You are mixing two different things. An accept finishes the _current_
ACL
Graeme Fowler wrote:
Bill, all
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 09:07 +, W B Hacker wrote:
*heavy sigh*
Quite. In order to achieve some clarity, please let me say:
A triggered 'accept' is not 'permanent' until end of DATA. Period.
This assertion is wrong.
An accept verb in an ACL simply means
Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 10:06 +, W B Hacker wrote:
Surely you did not interpret any part of this to have implied that an
earlier-phase 'accept' was somehow infectious, parasitical, viral, or
wot? child-bearing? ... immortal, even?
Er...
You know what? I have
Colin wrote:
On 27/10/2011 11:52, W B Hacker wrote:
This won't break anything:
=
# XSR Static route test
#
#deny
warn
logwrite = entering XSR test
condition = ${if eq {1}{${lookup{$domain}lsearch \
{/etc/staticroutes}{1}{0
!condition = verify recipient/callout=30s,defer_ok
SW Work SaS wrote:
Hello
Thanks to your help I've done some step with the rules I'd like to setup
in this case I would like to deny messages coming from certain users or
certain domains
but, as the users/domains can change a little, just keeping a base I would
like to see if there's a match
Colin wrote:
On 27/10/2011 06:42, W B Hacker wrote:
A host lookup (of any kind..) should NOT be called for on submission
port 587.
The typical user pool will be on broadband or dial-up and have neither
a proper PTR RR nor DNS 'chain' that Exim (fairly forgiving and
persistent at 'finding
Colin wrote:
On 27/10/2011 09:37, W B Hacker wrote:
Colin wrote:
Thank you for the reply,
All mail comes through frontend filtering servers which deliver via TLS
on port 25, so 587 is not involved.
As it happens I believe I have tracked down the cause.
I have the following ACL which
Colin wrote:
On 27/10/2011 10:40, Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 10:29 +0100, Colin wrote:
Regardless of what the warn should or should not do, it is in fact the
cause. When that is above the auth line things fail. When it is below,
it succeeds. When I change it to verify =
Colin wrote:
On 27/10/2011 11:18, Graeme Fowler wrote:
On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 11:05 +0100, Colin wrote:
Hi Graeme, thanks for the reply,
I am unsure that I follow it completely. In my understanding, the
require verify should only apply if the condition is met.
require is a verb, along with
Colin wrote:
On 27/10/2011 11:26, W B Hacker wrote:
Hi Graeme, thanks for the reply,
I am unsure that I follow it completely. In my understanding, the
require verify should only apply if the condition is met.
Not so. The ONLY condition that applies to that 'require' is the one
immediately
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
W B Hacker, 2011-10-27 07:51:
Ah - forgot to mention one of the BASIC conventions:
Any 'deny class' verb is permanent. Session having been terminated,
no later 'accept' could possibly act.
An 'accept' OTOH is *temporary* ..
...unless it is the LAST one to act
Colin wrote:
On 26/10/2011 12:38, Colin wrote:
Hi folks,
The default Exim configuration has require verify = recipient in
acl_check_rcpt.
I'm having problems with Outlook users where they send a message to 20
people and the smtp session for the whole message gets rejected
because one
Colin wrote:
On 26/10/2011 12:38, Colin wrote:
Hi folks,
The default Exim configuration has require verify = recipient in
acl_check_rcpt.
I'm having problems with Outlook users where they send a message to 20
people and the smtp session for the whole message gets rejected
because one
SW Work SaS wrote:
Hi to all
I'm rather new to Exim and *nix in general so I've lot to learn
I'm using a vps with cPanel / Exim,
on the server we have a firewall that warn us every X email sent
but the check is done only on the to and not to bc/bcc
so I would like to split incoming messages
1 - 100 of 1899 matches
Mail list logo
