Kenevel wrote:
Marc Sherman wrote:
Can you please resend with a clear explanation of what
you are trying to achieve,
I would like to take advantage of the VERP system of addressing to identify
unavialable mailboxes, and capture any failure notifications in a local
mailbox which, to be read
Steve Cox wrote:
Hi,
I'm setting up an archiving system that will store any email entering or
leaving the local network.
Any 'forward all mail' options in the existing mail servers/relays do
just that forward a copy to another mailbox - so all envelope details
are lost. I want to be
azzouz wrote:
W B Hacker wrote:
azzouz wrote:
hi,
I want to store aliases informations in ldap in order to view then
from a client mail and eventualy to modify then. Is it possible ?
Some have done it ?
*trim*
Could you give me some exemple concerning aliases management ?
Works
Edward Raymond Kryda wrote:
I had a message that took around 19 hours to actually get delivered.
Anyone have any ideas why? Here's the intitial log entry when it was
recieved:
Feb 2 07:45:20 sys16 exim[30853]: 2006-02-02 07:45:20 1F4dpu-00081d-2h
= [EMAIL PROTECTED] U=testuser P=local
Dean Brooks wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 04:44:57AM +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
Marc Sherman wrote:
This has come up before; if you're going to recommend to
random list posters that they configure 587 for
tls_on_connect, please warn them explicitly that your
configuration is very non-standard
Matthew Byng-Maddick wrote:
On Wed, Feb 08, 2006 at 10:50:00AM +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
*SNIP*
I know, let's all advocate overriding sane client defaults in everything
we reply to. I mean, that wouldn't be confusing for new posters or people
asking questions, would it?
Given that most
Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
I made it like this but nothing changed
condition = ${if {$message_size}{300K}}
warnspam = nobody:true
# condition = ${if {$message_size}{1M}}
# condition = ${if {$message_size}{300K}}
message = X-Spam_score:
Thanks
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Nigel Metheringham
Sent: Wednesday, February 08, 2006 2:29 PM
To: Vahric MUHTARYAN
Cc: 'W B Hacker'; exim-users@exim.org
Subject: RE: [exim] condition problem
On Wed, 2006-02-08 at 14:24 +0200, Vahric
Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
I don't want to make spam test if it's more then 300K
http://www.exim.org/exim-html-4.60/doc/html/spec.html/ch40.html#SECTscanspam
ass
deny message = This message was classified as SPAM
condition = ${if {$message_size}{10K}}
spam = nobody
I red this line
Vahric MUHTARYAN wrote:
I want to scan mails for spam if their size is under 300K ,
İf mail size pass 300K I will not send mail and normal process will be ..
( I don't want to reject something !!! ) :)
You mean scan the small ones and drop the big ones on the floor?
The 'discard' verb is
Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 09/02/06, Hawk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*trim*
2) Unless you have a specific use for it, turn off ident checking with
'rfc_1413_timeout = 0s' in your Exim config. This will stop Exim
trying to do an ident query to the client, which may be dropping ident
traffic at a
Peter Bowyer wrote:
Quite correct - thanks, Bill.
Hey - thanks for reminding *me* that I had forgotten to
re-insert that after some recent testing ...
Just shaved 30 seconds of my send-cycle for every message.
Bill
--
## List details at
Philip Hazel wrote:
On Wed, 28 Dec 2005, Marc Sherman wrote:
Here's a repost with excerpts from today's exim_mainlog file, un-edited:
This entry is logged over 30,000 times per day in the exim_mainlog:
2005-12-28 09:36:50 no IP address found for host
smtp05.dc2.safesecureweb.com (during SMTP
Daniel Tiefnig wrote:
Nigel Metheringham wrote:
On Wed, 2006-02-15 at 16:36 +, Philip Hazel wrote:
Do you think I should change the default to 5s?
Personally, yes. I don't think there are many sites for whom that is
both useful and they don't come back within 5 seconds.
I'd vote
Sub Zero wrote:
That policy is rather likely to land you on a blacklist yourself.
How will using gmail/yahoo land you on a blacklist?
The thinking of blocking even the postmaster address thinking they can
use gmail/yahoo, akin to let them eat cake, that's of issue.
If your system does
/m wrote:
Anyone had experiences with heavily loaded boxes keeping stale messages in
queue for 100d? What caused this to happen for you? Any information is
appreciated :)
Thanks!
/m
Is Exim still attempting to 'handle' the messages in question?
If so, I would scrutunize:
- the
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
W B Hacker wrote:
You may 'think it is OK..' but RFC's aside, mail to 'postmaster' is more
often generated by a 'daemon', not a human, so the chance of it
Not that I'd patronise blocking the postmaster address, but why do you
think that? The postmaster address
Brent Clark wrote:
Hi all
I would like to run something quickly among the list, just in case I
have not thought something through.
I have a router as so
*trimmed* (lots of code..)
If anyone would be so kind as to over look this and perhaps share with
me as too how I can enhance on this,
Steffen Heil wrote:
Hi
$mailqueue = shell_exec(exim -bpc);
exim: permission denied
Any ideas how I could get round this?
A way around this would be:
install sudo, write the command above to a script, set root execution rights
for the script to everyone, call sudo script from php.
But I
Servando Garcia wrote:
Hello List
I need to forward emails based on the subject line. I just started this
job , today to be exact, so I am not completely sure of the
configuration of the server. I am sure that the mail application is Exim
and that my new employer wants to forward emails
Chris Bolton wrote:
Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 17/02/06, Nigel Metheringham
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2006-02-17 at 09:29 +, Chris Bolton wrote:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.4 required=7.5
tests=AWL,BAYES_00,FORGED_RCVD_HELO,---^^^---
Jason Meers wrote:
Sub Zero wrote:
Hi,
My boss today asked me to mirror a newcomers all sent emails to his
mailbox.
How do I do this in exim 4.52?
Awaiting your answers.
Hi all,
I've been looking at this for the past two weeks as I also need to add
an archive solution to my existing
Jürgen Herz wrote:
Sven Hartge wrote:
Exim advertises STARTTLS in the EHLO response but upon sending the
STARTTLS command, nothing happens, it looks some client input is
expected. Not if connected via client nor by hand (telnet).
You should see a 220 TLS go ahead if you use telnet to
Yves Goergen wrote:
On 16.02.2006 21:09 (+0100), David Saez Padros wrote:
does exim use compression on tls connections ?
Isn't compression an elementary part of encryption, to avoid data
redundancy and make cracking the encryption unnecessarily easy?
As used in SSL/TLS and many other
Sven Hartge wrote:
Um 04:43 Uhr am 18.02.06 schrieb W B Hacker:
With fewer than ten servers running Exim, I cannot say for *sure*, but
with OpenSSL on FreeBSD this has never been an issue for us with Exim,
Qmail, Courier-MTA, DBMail, several IMAP/POP daemons, or anything else
that uses SSL
Jason Meers wrote:
Hi all,
here are my thoughts on an exim-archive howto I propose writing. I
intend this to be a starting point for people who need help setting this
up, not the definitive example and reference.
1) System filters seem to be just as good as any other method for
copying
Mike Cardwell wrote:
* on the Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 03:12:17PM -0500, Chris Knadle wrote:
On Saturday 28 January 2006 11:13, Mike Cardwell wrote:
That would probably work yes. Sounds like more of a nasty hack than I
was wanting to go with though.
Another way of doing this would be to
Mike Cardwell wrote:
* on the Tue, Feb 21, 2006 at 04:27:04AM +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
I understand the solution, but I was puzzled by your OP as to
why you wanted to do this at all (w/r Exim's EUID) - and am
still puzzled.
Just as background, in my own installations Exim, SA, ClamAV
Stian Jordet wrote:
Hi,
I was just wondering, what's the safest dns blacklist? I know they're
never fool-proof, but what lists are people on the list using to deny
mail?
Best regards,
Stian
If there was one always-best answer to that question, there
would probably be far fewer
Jim Pazarena wrote:
is there anywhere (an RFC for example) which indicates what
letters/numbers/symbols
are acceptable to be used within an alias email name?
things like joe+suzy@
steveanny@
I for one refuse : and , which I use as delimiters, and the pipes
^ |
but is there a
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of W B Hacker
Sent: Monday, February 27, 2006 6:13 PM
To: exim-users@exim.org
Subject: Re: [exim] SA causing Exim 421 timeout/frozen messages
Bradley Walker wrote:
To answer your question about how Exim/SA is setup, currently it's
used via router
Peter Bowyer wrote:
On 28/02/06, Bradley Walker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Currently I use an exim.conf file that is pre-created/released by the
webhosting control panel software makers and also created by Jeff Lasman who
*trim*
It's always difficult to give useful support to users of the
Viktor Vislobokov wrote:
Hi!
I run into problem in Exim 4.60
In exim.conf:
...
domainlist antivirus_domains = lsearch;/etc/exim/antivirus_domains
acl_smtp_data = acl_check_data
av_scanner = clamd:/tmp/clamd
...
acl_check_data:
denydomains = +antivirus_domains
message =
Nigel Metheringham wrote:
I would like to point out that if you want a reliable consistent simple
list of potential spammers, guaranteed to have absolutely no, zero, nada
false negatives, then you should go with the following list:-
*
It has the additional benefits of no
Cengiz Yazgan wrote:
I am getting this error message
Failed to get write lock for /var/spool/exim/db/wait-remote_smtp.lockfile:
timed out
What does it mean
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [/var/log]# exim -bV
Exim version 4.52 #1 built 28-Jul-2005 08:17:04
Copyright (c) University of Cambridge 2005
Angel Tsankov wrote:
I've been downloading exim for 2-3 hours now at less than 1KB/s. Are all
mirrors that slow?
Definitely not the mirrors, and probably not even the bandwidth
via Sofia, Bulgaria.
Stop and send 100 pings at each of several of the servers you
are trying to download
Jeremy C. Reed wrote:
Has there been any discussion of patching exim to add greylisting support
(so outside programs are not needed)?
There has been a good deal of discussion - most of it
concentrated about a year back.
I'm not the 'oracle' but I did not see any trend toward
incorporating
Marc Perkel wrote:
As many of you know AOL is contemplating a pay to send email plan.
*trim*
Let's be a bit more precise.
- all 'free' mail has a cost to send or receive, somewhere, born
by somebody, usually as part of an ISP service fee, or staff,
student, organization membership costs.
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Marc Haber wrote:
For a mailing list manager, a 550 is a bounce. If you reject too much
spam (which easily happens on lists with a low S/N ratio), you'll get
unsubscribed.
That might be true for some, but I know at least one (mlmmj) which sends
out a probe and
Marc Perkel wrote:
I don't allways agree with EFFs position on things - especially spam.
But the payment of money isn't a good way to distinguish real email from
spam.
The payment of money to the *recipeint* might be ;-)
- but to skip-over spam checks? Isn't bribing a policeman a
crime in
Richard Clayton wrote:
*trimmed*
Then, for consistency and the proper impact, you should be arranging to
do the same with Yahoo! and researching how to distinguish the clients
of Habeas and Ironport's Bonded Sender programme (I believe MSN and
Hotmail are signed up) ... and doubtless some
Richard Hobbs wrote:
Hello,
Our mail server has been up for 259 days now, and in the last few days we
have started to see emails go missing. They leave the mail client, and the
client thinks the email has been sent. However, quite a few of the emails
are never being received.
Our logs show
Greg Ward wrote:
*trimmed*
So ... why not tunnel SMTP through HTTP? IOW, when we *want* to do
Presuming you, or another staff member on your team have an
American Express, Visa, MC, or online banking or brokerage
account, several https-based examples should already be familiar
to you.
John W. Baxter wrote:
*trimmed*
Our local (and rather small) telephone directory reveals a Sexauer and
Hmmm We're lucky to even get a coffee-break here
Bill
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please
Dave Hartburn wrote:
Can anyone offer some advice on a maildir and filter problem?
The major issue is that this problem concerns my private e-mail on a
hosted server, rather than anything I administer for work. So, I am
limited to what I can do.
The hosters have recently changed to the courier
Philip Hazel wrote:
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
Further inspection with ktrace indicates that something
was setting O_NONBLOCK on the input stream (smtp_in in
smtp_in.c); the first read from the stream will then
typically fail with -EAGAIN, which is treated as an error.
As
Philip Hazel wrote:
On Wed, 22 Mar 2006, Chris Lightfoot wrote:
I believe it's because exim links against libc_r (because
it is linked against libcrypto, which itself is linked
against libc_r).
This does not seem to be a problem on FreeBSD 4.10, which is where I ran
my tests, which do
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Quoting Jakob Hirsch:
condition = ${if !match {$sender_helo_name}
{\N^([a-z0-9][-_a-z0-9]*\.)+[a-z]{2,6}$\N}}
This should have been case-insensitive:
condition = ${if !match {$sender_helo_name}
{\N^(?i)([a-z0-9][-_a-z0-9]*\.)+[a-z]{2,6}$\N}}
I have it now running
Adam Funk wrote:
On 2006-03-31, Steve Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think you should be sending your mail via your work's authenticated SMTP
relay (and yes, I'm aware they probably don't run one :). This is a
requirement anyway if your work published SPF records for the domain.
To do
Adam Funk wrote:
On 2006-03-31, W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
*trim*
If you weren't running a 'home Exim' at all, but simply had
multiple accounts set up in your MUA, each account would seek to
I've also got mail coming from cron jobs, logcheck and scripts, all of
which expect
Christopher Molnar wrote:
I have a question - is there anyway to speed up the transmission of mail by
authenticated users? I want the users to be able to log in and send mail
extremely quickly. I don't remember seeing the delay that I am seeing now
when we where using procmail. Can received mail
Alltimed wrote:
Hello
I have a customer who wants to archive all of their incoming and outgoing
mail into an IMAP Maildir folder (say .archive-in and .archive-out). He is
familiar with Sieve from a previous host and I can't say I know anytihng
about Sieve or Exim filtering. My question is this.
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
hello,
i'm trying to replace headers in the ACLs, so i could hint SpamAssassin
(through exiscan-acl) about the status of callout verification. however,
'warn message' adds a new header instead of replacing the existing one.
is replacing headers ACL-time possible or is
Marc Perkel wrote:
Trying to figure out what's causung this error:
2006-04-02 19:16:14 1FQEc2-0008MU-AJ == [EMAIL PROTECTED]
R=virtual_userforward defer (-1): bad mode (0100777) for
/etc/exim/control/domains/perkel.com/users/marc/filter.txt: 022 bit(s)
unexpected
Here's the router that's
Chris Purves wrote:
*trimmed*
My server (as well as myself) is located in Shanghai.
- On an 'Allocated Portable' IP
- In a dynamically-allocated IP netblock often denied MTA
connection by potential peers if not firewalled by the netblock
owner, the PRC Government, or some combination of
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
On Mon, Apr 03, 2006, W B Hacker wrote:
i'm trying to replace headers in the ACLs, so i could hint SpamAssassin
(through exiscan-acl) about the status of callout verification. however,
'warn message' adds a new header instead of replacing the existing one.
is replacing
Marc Perkel wrote:
OK - here's what I want to do. I want to forward a copy of selected
email to another email address, but only if the email address that I
want to forward to is a valid working email address. So - I need to do a
callout and check if the email address is valid before I forward
Marc Perkel wrote:
*trimmed*
the email address
I need to verify isn't either the sender or the recipient. I need to
verify and arbetrary address that I generate to see if it exists
Pardon my ignorance, but if you are the one who 'generates' it
and it is truly 'arbitrary' then WOGGE would
Marc Perkel wrote:
W B Hacker wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
*trimmed*
the email address
I need to verify isn't either the sender or the recipient. I need to
verify and arbetrary address that I generate to see if it exists
Pardon my ignorance, but if you are the one who 'generates
Tony Finch wrote:
On Tue, 4 Apr 2006, W B Hacker wrote:
require verify = recipient/callout
Well - yes, if on the same server
No, callouts work across servers. We use this on the MXs in Cambridge to
verify addresses in departments such as the Computer Lab that run their
own email
Marc Haber wrote:
Debian uses a sub-ACL to exclude sender e-mail addresses and sender IP
addresses from a number of ACL checks, and the notation of !acl has
been a convenient and intuitive way of specifying this behavior.
Wasn't aware of that capability. Do see the value.
If it were my
Marc Haber wrote:
On Wed, 29 Mar 2006 11:14:03 +0100, Jason Meers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Usual Permissions required on Exim Binaries
owner: root, group: root, permissions: 4755 (suid root)
Correct for /usr/sbin/exim4. The other exim related binaries are
root:root 755 as usual.
Usual
Stanislaw Halik wrote:
hello,
exiscan-acl works really well, except for one thing i'm not able to
figure out. $spam_report contains a large, verbose message with excerpts
from bodies and individual rule scoring.
is there a way to only fetch the rule scoring part or is matching it by
a regexp
an MTA without
'true' fixed-IP, DNS and PTR records any longer.
Fewer and fewer MTA will accept such connections, let alone the
traffic, and 'EasyDNS' operators are often blacklisted along
with dynamic IP blocks.
HTH
Bill
W B Hacker wrote:
Chris Purves wrote:
*trimmed*
My server
Jochen Knuth wrote:
Hi,
Tony Finch wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Philip Hazel wrote:
On Wed, 5 Apr 2006, Phil Pennock wrote:
-lutil should be correct.
Folks, please tell me whether this should be a permanent fix or not.
Yes, that should be present. I don't know why it worked on sesame
Marc Perkel wrote:
Working on load reduction tricks and increased spam rejection. It's sort
of a greylisting trick for TLDs that tend to be mostly all spam. The
idea being that the initial defer will get rid of a lot of spam that
never retries after one defer where real email will retry and
Avleen Vig wrote:
On Sun, Apr 09, 2006 at 04:00:41PM +0800, W B Hacker wrote:
I suspect you are correct, and tcpdump may show it clearly.
I don't think that should be the case.
If Daniel is sending packets larger than 400 bytes, it is his OWN router
that should complain that the packets
Marc Sherman wrote:
Avleen Vig wrote:
I don't think that should be the case.
If Daniel is sending packets larger than 400 bytes, it is his OWN router
that should complain that the packets are too large before they leave
the network.
By the time they get to the gmail servers, they should
Daniel Webb wrote:
*trimmed*
Sure enough, the tcpdump of a session shows that the packets are close to 576
bytes.
*trimmed*
I do have QoS with VoIP packets given highest priority, but given my
JMNSHO, but trying to run an MTA *and* VoIP on the same slender
resources you describe,
Philip Hazel wrote:
I have been asked for evidence of when local part suffixes were first
used for sorting messages into different folders (for a patent issue).
Restricted to internet and smtp?
Or would snail-mail, teletype distribution, phone numbers, BBS
services, SNA, and such help
Alexandre Busquets wrote:
Can exim4 works with sqlrelay.
'Yes, but'
We use PostgreSQL extensively for Exim virtual-domain
configuration, but do not recommend it to others as anything
close to an optimal methodology.
SQLRelay
- has value for many things where very heavy DB access is
Alexandre Busquets wrote:
I would test with sqlite.
wich is the string lookup
Ej: ${lookup mysql{
What has better performance with exim, mysql o postgresql
From decades of experience, we tend to prefer a proper
Relational Database Engine for SQL 'heavy' or general-purpose
use,
Brent Clark wrote:
Lasse Birnbaum Jensen wrote:
jkfloris wrote:
Hello,
I'm using Exim 4, Clamav, fetchmail, Spamassassin and Courier-Imap as
my mail server
everything is working fine, so that's not the issue.
But I want Clamav to ad a line to every email body or header. For
example:
Jim Pazarena wrote:
first message had a silly typo; sorry
Dunno if this fits, but problems w/r pipe transport build were
discused very recently under thread:
FreeBSD pipe_transport_setup build failure
Wherein the flag -lutil seemed to have (sometimes) been
required.
FWIW,
Menekhem M. Zviman wrote:
Hello,
My ISP, comcast.net, does not allow direct connection to their mail
server.
Nor should they.
Below is a log entry of an attempt to send mail via SquirrlMail
- Courier IMAP - Exim.
In all probability, comcast.net expect a 'subscriber' to connect
from an
I have a *vague* recollection of having seen a post on this sort
of error - but am not even usre it was on the Exim list:
2006-04-14 12:21:14 SMTP connection from [220.194.14.66]:16860
I=[203.194.153.81]:25 (TCP/IP connection count = 2)
2006-04-14 12:21:21 setsockopt(SO_KEEPALIVE) on
David Restall - System Administrator wrote:
Hi Bill,
In October 2005 there was a thread 'setsockopt(SO_KEEPALIVE) - is this about
Exim?'
but it doesn't appear to have been concluded apart from updating exim.
TTFN
D
Thanks!
This is the only box still at 4.54. Will see if 4.6X fixes it.
Alexandre Busquets wrote:
I have installed exim 4.60 (Compiled myself).
And in my logs i have two errors
2006-04-14 14:39:54 1FUNac-0002Q0-8z malware acl condition: clamd:
ClamAV returned /var/spool/exim/scan/1FUNac-0002Q0-8z: lstat() failed.
ERROR
Are you using IP or a unix socket to
never tried that.
Bill
On Fri, April 14, 2006 08:51, W B Hacker wrote:
Alexandre Busquets wrote:
I have installed exim 4.60 (Compiled myself).
And in my logs i have two errors
2006-04-14 14:39:54 1FUNac-0002Q0-8z malware acl condition: clamd:
ClamAV returned /var/spool/exim/scan/1FUNac
Olivier Bonvalet wrote:
Hello,
I have a problem : one exim is listening on port 80, so Apache can't
restart. I really don't know why it do this, but it is not the first
time...
Of course, there is not any reference to 80, http or www in
the exim4 conf... :S
What I see :
w30100:~# netstat
Alex wrote:
if Exim needs to delibery and email and i'm in a pop session, how exim do this?
It does it very well. ;-)
Or - to be more technical - it doesn't know or care if you are
logged-in and receiving. It has no connection to the POP or IMAP
daemons, save that of shared storage in
deiveries to more
than one type.
You are only 'locked in' if you believe you are.
Bill
2006/4/15, W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Alex wrote:
if Exim needs to delibery and email and i'm in a pop session, how exim do this?
It does it very well. ;-)
Or - to be more technical
Alex wrote:
I would like use maildir, but i'm on migration from cobalt 550, now
all users are using openwebmail.
And a good choise of Openwebmail is:
All preferences,... is stored in the user home.
I tested some webmail script (squirrelmail), but the preferences,.. is
stored in a http dir, with
Marc Haber wrote:
On Sat, 15 Apr 2006 14:31:18 +0800, W B Hacker [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
'exim4' implies Debian, so best to ask on the debian-speciifc
Exim list.
Why?
This doesn't look like a Debian-specific issue, and I fail to see what
the Debian maintainers could have broken to make
Folks,
Does anyone have experience with / a recommendation for..
.. tools or settings for exporting records from an SQL DB to a
CDB? (or similar Berkeley or GDB, even?)
The records in question would contain:
- UID
- PWD, crypt and/or plain
- aliases
- virtual domain.tld
- mailstore
Alex wrote:
Now i have exim 4.60+ dovecot+sqlite3
Exim 4.61_+, Dovecot, PostgreSQL here.
The doubts are:
work with virtual users or no.
You now have the tools to work more easily with virtual than
shell... *especially* if you need to support multiple domains.
That said, so long as it
MrTheo wrote:
Hi,
I'm currently setting up a mail system on a linux server that currently
hosts 3 domains. Every domain has its specific mail addresses, and all mail
users have a local user account with mail directories in their home dirs.
Everything is working fine as it is and people can
Can anyone confirm that spam_score_int is (and is intended to
be) an *unsigned* integer?
Or not?
Bill
--
## List details at http://www.exim.org/mailman/listinfo/exim-users
## Exim details at http://www.exim.org/
## Please use the Wiki with this list - http://www.exim.org/eximwiki/
Marc Perkel wrote:
Trying a load reduction trick which I will share if it works. Running
into a little snag and this is probably simple but I need to get user
mail to run iptables that requires user root to run, and without havinf
to use a password to do it.
1) install 'monitord' and run it
Bill Hacker wrote:
Folks,
Does anyone have experience with / a recommendation for..
.. tools or settings for exporting records from an SQL DB to a
CDB? (or similar Berkeley or GDB, even?)
Clarification:
- to multiple, 'bespoke' CDB/DB, GDB, each with only the
essentials for its purpose.
Bill Hacker wrote:
John Hall wrote:
On 4/15/06, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Trying a load reduction trick which I will share if it works. Running
into a little snag and this is probably simple but I need to get user
mail to run iptables that requires user root to run, and
John Hall wrote:
On 4/15/06, Marc Perkel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I'm mail and I run sudo it asks for the root password. What do I need
to add to get around that?
See NOPASSWD in man sudoers.
regards,
John
??
Is that a good idea?
I think I am beginning to see why some folks say
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Quoting W B Hacker:
Can anyone confirm that spam_score_int is (and is intended to be) an
*unsigned* integer?
Of course not, many scores are negative, like your mail:
X-Spam-Score: -2.6 (--)
Oh, and please don't steal threads (last point of MailingListEtiquette
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Quoting W B Hacker:
Steal threads *how* ?? I started a new one.
No, you replied to a message in an existing thread, otherwise there
would have been no References and In-Reply-To header.
Ah so - not sure how I missed that - thanks.
Still not sure where
Marten Lehmann wrote:
Hello,
looking at spool_mbox.c, I'd say no (apart from changing the code).
Too bad.
But why would you want to do that?
Well, as I explained in my first email, there are different virus
scanners and spamfilters that just don't work with solely LF-sequences.
Jakob Hirsch wrote:
Quoting W B Hacker:
Steal threads *how* ?? I started a new one.
No, you replied to a message in an existing thread, otherwise there
would have been no References and In-Reply-To header.
Still not sure where the negative spam score is coming from BTW
low bayes
Andreas Metzler wrote:
Jakob Hirsch [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Quoting W B Hacker:
Steal threads *how* ?? I started a new one.
No, you replied to a message in an existing thread, otherwise there
would have been no References and In-Reply-To header.
Which will cause it to appear as part
Tom Kistner wrote:
Marc Perkel wrote:
Basicly my idea is that when a dictionary tack occurs I want to block
the IP address for a short period of time as a load reduction trick with
the chain being cleared every few minutes.
I've been doing this for a few months with very good results. Not
David Saez Padros wrote:
Hi !!
If you have PHP installed with support for al db types you use you could
use it's CLI mode version to make a script to do that.
Does anyone have experience with / a recommendation for..
.. tools or settings for exporting records from an SQL DB to a CDB?
(or
David Saez Padros wrote:
Hi !!
It's not a matter of reinventing anything, this i just a docen
lines of code so it will be easier to code it in your preferred
language than searching, installing and learning a new program.
Sorry - NFW PHP or its libs or structures ever get near one of
my
1 - 100 of 1899 matches
Mail list logo
