On Jun 21, 2011, at 4:21 AM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
[...]
The only interesting thing about the latest TM org employee research
is that a landmark independent study
On Jun 21, 2011, at 8:50 AM, maskedzebra wrote:
Hey, Ravi Yogi, I'm new to FFL. I probably should read some of your
other posts before responding to this one. However, I just want to
say it: You really know how to hurt a guy. I am sure you're right
that I am an egoist, but could you
On Jun 21, 2011, at 9:42 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
It is worth pointing out that as far as I remember
Ravi has since said on two different occasions that
his entire interview was a put-on, and that he was
taking advantage of Rick's naivete. I don't remember
the exact messages in which he said
On Jun 21, 2011, at 10:49 AM, Mike Dixon wrote:
let's not forget the tenth commandment. Thou shalt not covet.
Doesn't that mean keep your freakin hands off other peoples
property? Yet liberal politicians covet the wealth of successful
people in order to buy votes and give the false
On Jun 21, 2011, at 1:58 PM, sparaig wrote:
I've already posted a list of published research on Pure
Consciousness during TM and on the physiological/psychological
profiles of people who report pure consciousness 24/7 for years/
decades at a time.
Alleged pure consciousness.
The
On Jun 21, 2011, at 2:08 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, maskedzebra no_reply@...
wrote:
You don't acknowledge self realization as anything special
anyway, so you can't have it both ways, can't push against
something that according to you does not exist. And
On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:11 PM, sparaig wrote:
Dunno where he got the idea. Others on this list have reported him as saying
the same thing. maskedzebra just confirmed what I said in his previous
message. Whether or not his claim was valid, isn't the point. The point is
that within the TM
On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:36 PM, maskedzebra wrote:
RESPONSE: No, Lawson, I very much did need to validate it for myself. But you
see, Unity Consciousness validates itself—I wrote 11 books about this: either
about Unity Consciousness directly, or about world events as seen through the
On Jun 21, 2011, at 6:49 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
On Jun 21, 2011, at 3:11 PM, sparaig wrote:
Dunno where he got the idea. Others on this list have reported him as
saying the same thing. maskedzebra just confirmed what I said
On Jun 21, 2011, at 7:47 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
[...]
Of course it could be both. ANd I don't see much distinction, if any, since
MMY also said that CC was required to be stabilized before GC or UC could
be stabilized.
One
On Jun 21, 2011, at 7:51 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig LEnglish5@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
[...]
One is technically a fabrication, the other is purely spontaneous. That's
actually a HUGE difference
On Jun 18, 2011, at 2:42 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
On Jun 18, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@ wrote:
Men have taken herbs and now are going to India for PK
On Jun 17, 2011, at 2:06 PM, maskedzebra wrote:
RESPONSE: Not a single person in my lifetime has demonstrated
impeccably and infallibly that such a ground of all being even
exists. That is, if I am to go by his/her claim to become the
embodiment of such an irreducible level of reality. In
On Jun 20, 2011, at 12:04 PM, Mike Dixon wrote:
Vaj, do you really want to go there?
How can you not? Christo-fascists are destroying this country with
their wars of foreign aggression, draining our economy, while the
rich get tax cuts and the needy get their services cut. Christian
On Jun 18, 2011, at 12:25 PM, Alex Stanley wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@... wrote:
Men have taken herbs and now are going to India for PK, have all
been urged to get blood tests, stat. From what I hear these are
not MAPI herbs that were
On Jun 15, 2011, at 8:19 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
Eh, so, make a choice: help a saint and don't go to the dome, or,
don't help a saint and go to the dome.
Which is more important and why?
[the question of should this be a criterion for keeping your dome
badge is another question
From the ontologicalethics list:
Spirituality has never had it so good.
With the economy booming, an increasing number of Indians are turning
to spirituality to help them cope with pressures generated by their
materialistic lifestyles.
Catering to a huge and growing international market
On Jun 13, 2011, at 1:36 PM, John wrote:
IMO, the human physiology is the living system that reflects the
effects of the planets in the solar system. It is through human
consciousness that we can understand their influences in our
individual lives, physically and psychologically. From
On Jun 10, 2011, at 6:05 PM, Yifu wrote:
Could be a genuine paradox here; since normally, we'd expect (given the
history of certain so-called E'd people, say the confirmed Gang of Three:
Andy, Bevan, and RWC.) conversations like this...
Or it could be, as RWC 'pines, illegitimate lineal
On Jun 10, 2011, at 6:37 PM, Ravi Yogi wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@... wrote:
Flannigan, if he indeed is 'awakened', provides a clear example that
'awakened' self-important assholes can still be self-important assholes.
Et Tu do? You
On Jun 9, 2011, at 12:02 PM, Bhairitu wrote:
On 06/09/2011 06:19 AM, Duveyoung wrote:
http://www.disinfo.com/2010/10/911-firefighters-reveal-huge-
explosions-before-towers-collapsed/
Now Edg, you know on FFL you've got to connect that somehow to whether
the world is going to end and FFL'ers
On Jun 9, 2011, at 12:14 PM, Duveyoung wrote:
Bhairitu wrote:
Now Edg, you know on FFL you've got to connect that somehow to
whether the world is going to end and FFL'ers didn't even make it
to CC. Obviously looking at the hot topics here that's whats
really important, not the
On Jun 7, 2011, at 11:00 PM, emptybill wrote:
Vaj:
Give me some Don Juan Matus anytime over becoming
the latest self-proclaimed Super-Rishi or Raja.
Vaj quotes a fictional character from the Canteñada books
to nail down his arguments. So is this guy a bull-shitter or not?
I think troll sums
On Jun 8, 2011, at 2:52 AM, cardemaister wrote:
L.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
The UC view of Vedanta, esp. in the Shank. tradition, not only
avoids siddhis, it considers them antithetical to the evolution
of consciousness.
So, why did Shank
On Jun 8, 2011, at 4:47 PM, John wrote:
The land bought by the company for its proposed headquarters is not
auspicious for good fortune. It is not rectangular or a square and has a
sharp edge on one of the sides. The company may incur difficulties and losses
due to this configuration.
On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:12 PM, WillyTex wrote:
Dzogchen is just like TM practice, that is, it is the natural,
primordial state or natural condition of the mind and a
meditation practice aimed at realizing that condition - pure
awareness.
Dzogchen is nothing like TM practice. If you think it
On Jun 6, 2011, at 10:24 PM, wayback71 wrote:
And see post #194922 of a few years ago written by Vaj about Tenzin
Wangyal Rinpoche. Vaj has spent some time with him.
How did that pan out for your friend?
http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2075011,00.html
On Jun 6, 2011, at 9:38 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@... wrote:
It kind of shows how un-seriously Maharishi took this information that it
would be up to ME to cough up this furball!
[...]
And given that the so called
According to Robin Woodsworth Carlsen, TM-style enlightenment is actually of
form of induced psychosis. It is perceived exactly as described, but is in fact
a form of psychosis. Given that one can experience such things as the universe
as fluctuations of consciousness while under the influence
On Jun 7, 2011, at 7:55 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote:
[...]
Yeah, exactly. If individual brains produce individual
consciousnesses, you have to do some fairly elaborate
acrobatics to speak of Consciousness. MMY was definitely
an
On Jun 5, 2011, at 6:05 PM, seventhray1 wrote:
I mean actually what you are describing sounds like the path Vaj
is on.
And what do you know about the path I'm on?
Doesn't sound like much to be honest.
On Jun 5, 2011, at 3:33 PM, turquoiseb wrote:
Just for the fun of it, you understand. :-)
The first: I bailed from the TMO early on, in 1978 or so.
To my memory, at that point Maharishi had not really ever
talked about anything beyond UC, his vision of Unity
Consciousness. I have heard since
On Jun 6, 2011, at 1:28 PM, WillyTex wrote:
Apparently I'm the only one on this forum that
has listened to the complete MMY recordings
from 1967. Go figure.
Hey! Just for the fun of it why not listen to the
recordings, and then post comments on them?
Really immaterial Willy.
MMY began
On Jun 6, 2011, at 2:02 PM, PaliGap wrote:
Fair comment. So why not just simply tell us? Please try
to use language that even a dolt such as I can understand.
Maximum word length = 12 please (8 preferred).
Loving, well-meaning, friendly, charitable, tolerant,
sympathetic, modest minds
The real Maharishi effect! ;-)
On Jun 2, 2011, at 11:39 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
http://www.time.com/time/video/player/0,32068,971515233001_2075202,00.html
On May 31, 2011, at 2:10 PM, Sal Sunshine wrote:
On May 31, 2011, at 1:00 PM, merlin wrote:
Beautifull news from Mongolia
It figures, since people in the developed nations
have long since lost interest in the horse manure
the TMO peddles, that they would then try
and hit-up some of the
On May 30, 2011, at 3:38 AM, sparaig wrote:
Ironically, it was YOU who first suggested to Unc (after he posted his Clint
Eastwood in holy socks story) that he should consider a career in
professional writing
Well, if he ever needs a editor...
:-)
On May 30, 2011, at 11:38 AM, Buck wrote:
Dateline Fairfield,
Word around town here recently is that the monies given to build the new
sustainable-living building on campus were squandered by poor design concept
and an incompetent project management.A project pushed by some on the
On May 29, 2011, at 12:50 PM, shanti2218411 wrote:
Please go to Enlightened Spirituality.org- and see page on neo-advaitin
Ramesh Balsekar.It appears that Mr Balseker rather than cutting through
bullshit(i.e. relative to the meaning of vedanta)
interjected a significant amount of it
that Maharishi has corrupted it, then it all makes sense
why Vaj would care. It comes from taking the knowledge very seriously.
A tradition? Please.
TM literature and research claims that it comes from an imagined Vedic
tradition, when in fact, none of the mantras used in TM occur in Rig Veda
On May 28, 2011, at 4:48 AM, cardemaister wrote:
http://www.ihatemyiphone.com/page2of82/
The Iphone is just an other piece of shit from Apple.
I am on the road 200+ days a year and spend more than 4 hrs a day on the
phone. My company provides a blackberry that I enjoy and become
had gone into some disrepair. He does seem to believe that
there are people capable of passing on the correct information in the right
way, and that he has met some of them. (Feel free to jump in at any time Vaj
considering this is your head we are autopsying!
I just happened to read
On May 28, 2011, at 4:37 PM, emptybill wrote:
What V - We are of Peace is not telling you is that almost all Buddhist
teachers tell their students not to indulge in disputes with students or
teachers of other traditions of practice or other forms of meditation,
whether Buddhist, Hindu,
On May 28, 2011, at 2:56 PM, emptybill wrote:
People? You mean actual Vedic pandits like SSRS just imagine it?
Never met him, so no I didn't mean SSRS (who long ago dropped Mahesh off of his
website as one of his gurus). Smart move, I thought.
Gosh, and all this time he was just giving me
On May 28, 2011, at 6:07 PM, tartbrain wrote:
Because he sees his infinite Self in you?
LOL.
On May 28, 2011, at 7:10 PM, emptybill wrote:
Who are you trying to kid?
You have proclaimed all sorts esoterica here.
Except your implied training and your sources.
That means they lack credibility.
Aren't you ashamed of putting all these people on?
No, of course not, as I'm not.
I do
On May 28, 2011, at 7:27 PM, tartbrain wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@... wrote:
wrathful compassion?? Are you kidding me, fool?? LOL your kids must just
love you dude...In any case wrathful compassion is reserved as a tool for
realized beings, not
On May 27, 2011, at 8:15 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
But you won't be able to. You won't even try.
Of course, if he does, my attorney will have a hay-day with him.
On May 27, 2011, at 4:10 AM, cardemaister wrote:
So, you seem to think that Shankara was -- according to
Shankara-dig-vijaya by Maadhava-VidyaaraNya -- molesting
women after having performed the yogic siddhi 'cittasya
para-shariiraavesha' into the dead body of King Amaruka?
Interesting
On May 26, 2011, at 9:41 PM, richardnelson108 wrote:
Thanks for giving me the post # on mahapatra.
I can't really comment on it much.
Some of it (about MMY's health) does match with what he told me.
I can only say that he had only positive things to say about MMY,
how much he loved him and
provide
evidence that shows your lying and committing slander.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
On May 27, 2011, at 8:15 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
But you won't be able to. You won't even try.
Of course, if he does, my attorney will have a hay-day with him.
On May 27, 2011, at 10:18 AM, feste37 wrote:
So, you poison your spiritual teacher, then for the rest of your
life you choose to sit directly under his portrait, give him credit
for everything you have done and are doing, and thank him by name
after every speech or lecture you make.
On May 27, 2011, at 10:24 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
Thanks for providing these sources
One of the reasons I don't post it every time this topic comes up, is
because I assume most people who've done any objective examination of
Mahesh and his character are already familiar with it from
On May 27, 2011, at 11:00 AM, richardnelson108 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tartbrain no_reply@... wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
On May 27, 2011, at 10:24 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
Thanks for providing these sources
One
On May 27, 2011, at 2:10 PM, emptybill wrote:
Who the fucking hell cares what you have to say about this?
Go talk to Bariatric-I whose opinion is that everything is opinion.
You'll be able to entertain him for a moment.
As someone who used to teach at the Maharishi School, Edg's opinions
On May 27, 2011, at 2:47 PM, WillyTex wrote:
Vaj:
If Mahesh thinks that he is backed by Shankaracharya,
then what is proper on his part is to tell people to
take initiation from Shankaracharya...
Stupid idiot - ordinary people can't take 'initiation'
from a Shankaracharya, unless
On May 25, 2011, at 10:04 PM, emptybill wrote:
I'm selling the idea as a genuine return to an old world charm for imported
nath-yogis, which V claims to be.
A real old world charm a la the Nathas would be ashes.
On May 26, 2011, at 7:00 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
Pile on? Vaj has simply been exposed as a liar. Not sure what standard you
look for in evaluating statements. But Vaj made a series of assertions and
all of them turned out to be false. When asked to back up these assertions,
the best he
point them out? Especially
since he seems so sure that Vaj has
been exposed as a liar.
We'll see what happens. Over time these things have a way of coming out.
We've heard the expose of Mahapatra, his close physician and Judith Bourque,
among others.
But mark my words, the historical record
On May 26, 2011, at 8:32 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
As I understand it Richard Nelson's sources were first hand sources who
acutally were in a position to know some of the details which were alleged to
have taken place. Richard says he spoke directly with the lawyer who handled
SBS's will,
On May 26, 2011, at 8:50 AM, feste37 wrote:
Have you even read the posts by Richard you quote here? He presents a very
strong case against all the accusations made by Vaj. Read it. All you do is
try to smear him as unstable, which is plainly not the case.
What part of drooling TB don't
On May 26, 2011, at 7:19 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sundur@... wrote:
Pile on? Vaj has simply been exposed as a liar. Not sure
what standard you look for in evaluating statements. But
Vaj made a series of assertions and all of them
On May 26, 2011, at 7:40 PM, wayback71 wrote:
I guess it depends on how you define TB. In my version, a TB would never
ever go attempt to find out more about the rumors of the murder of Guru Dev.
TB's refuse to think about such info for more than a few seconds before
relegating the bad
On May 26, 2011, at 7:34 PM, richardnelson108 wrote:
I am NOT a TB. And I have read Judith's book.
TM works for me and I value what is has given me. Thats all.
And what you don't seem to ever want to admit is that TM and MMY may have
some value for some people.
Well one unfortunate
This is the guy Mahesh stole his formulas from, according to one of
Balraj's students. His medicines were supposed to be used and made
available to everyone, inexpensively. Mahesh tried to patent them and
then sold them for very high prices (unusual for Ayurvedic medicines).
Yet another
On May 25, 2011, at 10:21 AM, sparaig wrote:
Its a bit silly for Vaj to say these things since BalRaj
Maharishi's picture is still on the bottle. If he had REALLY
objected, he could have sued to have it removed...
Lawson
I don't think he's the kind of person who would sue. He just
On May 25, 2011, at 1:20 PM, richardnelson108 wrote:
And yet you assume you know that Maharishi stole the formulas
I heard it directly from one of Balraj's students.
I guess one of the problems with the open, innocent hearts of healers
like Balraj is that mountebanks like Mahesh love to
On May 25, 2011, at 2:18 PM, emptybill wrote:
Puleez
Vaj loves us so much he just serves us the poisoned
antidote to free us from ourselves and our enslavement.
What a bodhisattva!
Didn't you read his recent post where
he declared his mission to free us from our
bondage to TM and the whole
On May 24, 2011, at 6:49 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
Since everybody's talking about the afterlife lately, here are a
few excerpts from the smartest book I've read on the subject in
some time, David Eagleman's Sum: Forty Tales From The Afterlives.
The second one got a laugh out of me when I
On May 23, 2011, at 9:10 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@... wrote:
It would be more helpful if you would hold your own pretensions in
equal contempt.
So are you going to list what you think they are or should I put this in my
you
Imagine there's no Heaven
It's easy if you try
No hell below us
Above us only sky
Imagine all the people
Living for today
Imagine there's no countries
It isn't hard to do
Nothing to kill or die for
And no religion too
Imagine all the people
Living life in peace
You may say that I'm a
From:
The Lennon Sutras
We're playing those mind games together
Pushing barriers,
planting seeds
Playing the mind guerilla
Chanting the Mantra:
Peace on Earth
We all been playing mind games
forever
Some kinda druid dude's
lifting the veil.
Doing the mind guerilla
Some call
On May 22, 2011, at 4:09 AM, cardemaister wrote:
prolly caused mainly by Helicobacter pylori -infection
You do know this can be taken care of with antibiotics, right? Yogic flying,
much less so...
On May 20, 2011, at 4:00 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
As are we. Because the fish seemingly have no choice
as to whether to bite or not. They are locked into
attachment behaviors that run their lives. All that
we do is dangle one of the attachments in front of
them, and they don't just bite, they
On May 20, 2011, at 9:07 AM, Peter wrote:
Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
And so therefore we provide a great and important
service: helping people wake up to their own attachments.
Vaj, I can only surmise that you're joshing because if you're not,
this would be very sad indeed.
Wait till you
On May 20, 2011, at 9:10 PM, WillyTex wrote:
Sorry to not edit the below, but just wanted to
emphasize the response ratio: one line vs spew.
Sal:
Lawson, I don't really think we need to revisit why
the posting limit was implemented in the first place...
So, we could at least get in
On May 20, 2011, at 9:13 PM, WillyTex wrote:
Please check the description of this group on its
home page. Nothing Vaj posts is anything other than
on topic, according to that. What you're saying is
that Vaj posts things you don't like...
emptybill:
So should we pray to you in your own
Marshy's first enlightened one spoke thus:
Maharishi never, to my eyes anyway, seemed, as an individual celestial or
angelic in any way whatsoever—although it could (and did) seem as if one were
in the presence of an archangel—but that was just the vibe I think [ROFLOL].
Maharishi was very
On May 20, 2011, at 10:52 PM, emptybill wrote:
So now it can be told. This is how petty little western dzogchen boys play in
the yard. I'm sure Namkhai finds you amazing. Bet you can show him what is
what. Bet you even have an Italian nickname now.
It would certainly be appropriate for
On May 18, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
Perhaps a useful question is this: just how deep does the purity
of the teaching have to be to ensure that a meditator has a
correct experience of TM, or some other technique. From what
teachers told me, there seem to be two
On May 19, 2011, at 8:33 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
On May 18, 2011, at 3:40 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
Perhaps a useful question is this: just how deep does the
purity of the teaching have to be to ensure that a meditator
On May 19, 2011, at 6:38 PM, richardnelson108 wrote:
Hello Vaj- I could not help but respond to your post #277247.
Why do you continually feel the need to act like an expert about things you
know nothing about.
You say we now know two things. We do not know anything. We do not
know
On May 17, 2011, at 11:30 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, whynotnow7 whynotnow7@...
wrote:
Learning about TM and Maharishi from the ironically named TM-Free
Blog is like attempting to learn about black people from the KKK.
Not quite logical.
On May 17, 2011, at 11:15 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius wrote:
This appears to be correct. However, many who practice TM, many who
practice other methods, do have very strong and seemingly
unshakable beliefs related to the practises, so the question
arises, because these beliefs did not
But it is so *beautiful*!Posted: 16 May 2011 11:49 AM PDTDerren Brown (http://tinyurl.com/3dmjkf) is a "mentalist" (http://tinyurl.com/zm4yt). Here he demonstrates how easy it is to induce a false spiritual experience in someone: http://tinyurl.com/278gx7z. And all false spiritual experiences
Unhooking From Maharishi's Teachings: Laurie Interviews Sudarsha
about the Puja (Ceremony)
Posted by Laurie at 5/14/2011 06:17:00 PM
I (Laurie) left TM 30 years ago, after 10 years in the TM movement,
and I have been deprogramming myself ever since. I now believe that
everything I was
Perhaps endarkenment is a better word?
From Maharishi's first certified enlightened human:
Although it is embarrassing for me read the stuff, Gina Catena
posted on this blog my account of getting enlightened—which includes
Maharishi's comment: You're somewhere in the layers of wholeness.
On May 17, 2011, at 10:04 AM, WillyTex wrote:
Vaj:
...bypassed my critical thinking, and went straight
into my belief system.
TM practice isn't based on beliefs, so apparenty
Sudarsha was not practicing TM. In TM practice
you go beyond or transcend critical thinking.
Anyone who attempts
On May 17, 2011, at 11:43 AM, turquoiseb wrote:
Here's where I might quibble with some of your
language.
I didn't write it, it's from Joe Kellet on TMFree.
a disappointed sarcastic pessimist
but you can call me Vaj for short
Sorry, that name's been taken. How about ass? It's short and sweet.
On May 11, 2011, at 11:22 PM, seventhray1 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
On May 11, 2011, at 8:45 PM, giveabighand wrote:
The Norway 1963 checking notes are in a box in my basement. I
will dig them out some day.
Well you should scan away
On May 12, 2011, at 1:40 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:
Humorous responses indeed especially sharing the posterity part,
but you are very harsh on TM Uncle Vaj, very harsh, considering
it's all dreaming the dream of thought constructs. I just can't
understand why you always have
On May 12, 2011, at 8:03 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
You have to wonder where Vaj spends the majority of his spiritual
capital. It's like he's married to his Buddhist (or whatever)
tradition, but as soon as he's done his husbandly duties there,
he's out the door to see his mistress, the TMO
On May 12, 2011, at 8:38 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@... wrote:
On May 12, 2011, at 8:03 AM, seventhray1 wrote:
You have to wonder where Vaj spends the majority of his spiritual
capital. It's like he's married to his Buddhist (or whatever
On May 11, 2011, at 3:30 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:
I liked Rick's statement that enlightenment may be accidental but
practicing spirituality makes you accident prone which is totally
spot on.
The statement actually came from Baker Roshi.
Oops! Another accident.
On May 11, 2011, at 8:41 AM, Vaj wrote:
On May 11, 2011, at 3:30 AM, Ravi Yogi wrote:
I liked Rick's statement that enlightenment may be accidental but
practicing spirituality makes you accident prone which is totally
spot on.
The statement actually came from Baker Roshi.
Oops
On May 11, 2011, at 4:26 PM, giveabighand wrote:
I came across a copy of the TM checking notes from a course in Norway in
1963. One of the instructions was, sit lazily. I loved it but some people
were freaked out by such a radical instruction. Our entire western way of
life is threatened
On May 11, 2011, at 8:45 PM, giveabighand wrote:
2000 people sitting lazily in the domes are out to save the world. Its
perfect! How could it not work!
Good question.
The only way it would not work is if, somehow, the dogma of effortlessness had
spread thru the sangha and became an
On May 11, 2011, at 8:45 PM, giveabighand wrote:
The Norway 1963 checking notes are in a box in my basement. I will dig them
out some day.
Well you should scan away and release them to Wikileaks. Include any detached,
relevant historical info as a separate txt file.
1301 - 1400 of 10930 matches
Mail list logo
