--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "coshlnx" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --Interesting. TM and its practice is like laying bare an open field, with trash strewn on the field needing collection and disposal. Personally, I use various "karma busting" mantras designed for the disposal
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 1/7/06 2:18 PM, a_non_moose_ff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course the humor and silliness in all of the above pales to the
One(s) who proclaims to BE Brahman and to see Brahamn in all things -
- and then
--- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
--- Patrick wrote:
It makes me think I'm in CC.
Is that important to you?
I'd like to be enlightened, yeah, even if it's baby
enlightenment. But it's a casual desire, like my
desires for wealth and women. I'd like to have them,
but I'm not going to bother
--- sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick
Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Vaj wrote:
IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level
of
transformation to uproot vasanas.
Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of
us,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- a_non_moose_ff wrote:
--- Patrick wrote:
It makes me think I'm in CC.
Is that important to you?
I'd like to be enlightened, yeah, even if it's baby
enlightenment. But it's a casual desire, like my
--- TurquoiseB wrote:
This is a city full of wealthy older men on whose
arms are women who would never be seen with them
except for the fact that they're wealthy.
So I've noticed. But it was not until this post that I was
inspired to buy Diamonds are a girl's best friend from
iTunes.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas
regarding CC rather than someone's actual experience
of CC.
Because your experience is different, or just because
of the writing style?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Handed out on one of the TTCs. I think La Antilla
Thanks Rick! One of the best posts I've seen on FFL. Really clearly
defined, well
--- Peter wrote:
my intellectual
concerns/interests regarding CC (baby realization) are
largely different than the author of this post and the
author seems to make some, not all, conceptual
distinctions that don't seem very relevent to CC.
Most of these 20 questions strike me as a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas
regarding CC rather than someone's actual
On Jan 7, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:One of the exciting things that Maharishi attempted to do was make a connection between spiritual growth and practical daily behavior. It turned out to be a tougher connection than I ever imagined it would be. That's because, IMO, TM as a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Peter wrote:
my intellectual
concerns/interests regarding CC (baby realization) are
largely different than the author of this post and the
author seems to make some, not all, conceptual
distinctions
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Not La Antilla. I love how Jim and I have opposite
responses to this post! (Hehehehe)
Peter, didn't you get the astral memo from Ramana Maharshi on The
Strict Conformance of Enlightenened Thoughts and Actions?
I'll
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
One of the exciting things that Maharishi attempted to do
was make a connection between spiritual growth and
practical daily behavior. It turned out to be a tougher
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list
Judy writes:
I've always figured that what is called self-
actualization *is* what MMY calls CC.
Self-actualization certainly *sounds* like the self being aware of itself,
which is one
characteristic of CC. But from what I've read of self-actualized behavior, it
simply
describes people who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's because, IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
transformation to uproot vasanas. Vasana-kshaya, the obliteration
of
--- Vaj wrote:
IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
transformation to uproot vasanas.
Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led to investigations
into ways to
uproot those vasanas. Others have been blacklisted from the TMO for making
those
investigations.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas
regarding CC rather than someone's actual experience
of CC.
Hmmm. I take it your experience of CC contradicts the following?
--- Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas
regarding CC rather than someone's actual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Presumably they're from Mahesh himself, no?
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Peter wrote:
This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas
regarding CC rather than someone's actual experience
of CC.
What is YOUR
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Peter wrote:
my intellectual
concerns/interests regarding CC (baby realization) are
largely different than the author of this post and the
author seems to make some, not all, conceptual
distinctions
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
One of the exciting things that Maharishi attempted to do
was make a connection between spiritual growth and
practical daily behavior. It turned out to be a tougher
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Peter wrote:
my intellectual
concerns/interests regarding CC (baby realization) are
largely different than the author of
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:16 PM, sparaig wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Presumably they're from Mahesh himself, no? On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Peter wrote: This list seems to be comprised of someone's ideas regarding CC rather than someone's actual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2006, at 10:42 AM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
One of the exciting things that Maharishi attempted to do
was make a connection
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
---
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- Vaj wrote:
IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
transformation to uproot vasanas.
Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led to
investigations into ways to
uproot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:16 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Presumably they're from Mahesh himself, no?
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Peter wrote:
This list seems
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:16 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Presumably they're from Mahesh himself, no?
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:20 AM, Peter wrote:
This list seems
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Vaj wrote: IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of transformation to uproot vasanas. hetudvayaM hi chittasya vaasanaa cha samiiraNaH .tayor vinashhTa ekasmins tad dvaav api vinashyataH .. 1..---
On Jan 7, 2006, at 12:59 PM, a_non_moose_ff wrote:Vaj, can you be more specific on what type of methods thjese are, or description of such.I generally would not discuss such methods. I have had specific "knowledge unfolding" in side of me, perhaps similar to what Jim is referring to, where
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote:--- Vaj wrote: IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of transformation to uproot vasanas. Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led to investigations into ways to uproot those vasanas. Others have been blacklisted
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- Vaj wrote: IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level oftransformation to uproot vasanas.hetudvayaM hi chittasya
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:00 PM, Patrick Gillam wrote:
--- Vaj wrote:
IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
transformation to uproot vasanas.
Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led to
Anon writes: snipped
This inner-revelation effect seems consistant with what a Maharishi
pundit told me in a jyotish reading. Ironic as it sounds, I asked the
pundit about how and when I could / would find a teacher / guru for
personal guidance. He said that for my chart, that was not necessary,
On Jan 7, 2006, at 1:50 PM, sparaig wrote:Fine, but don't expect the average person to seek out the traditional texts and their commentaris."average person" being the operative word. BTW, how do you know that the texts, their commentaries are correct, or that the translations are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This list seems to
On Jan 7, 2006, at 2:41 PM, cardemaister wrote:I mean, caturthaH praaNaayaamaH during TM kshaNika-samaadhi"destroys" samiiraNa ([movement of] praaNa), and, doing that, does the same to lots of vaasanaas! Unfortunately for this idea, the style of spontaneous pranayama that occurs in meditation is
on 1/7/06 1:45 PM, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
TOm T:
It has been my experience and of a number of people that I know that
you will deal with your stuff before but most assuredly after. The
clarity makes it impossible to ignore any longer the stuff not dealt
Yeah, okay. But do we each get a gold crown?
Sal
On Jan 7, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
Praise not necessary, just send $2500 each. Time payments accepted, with
interest.
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 20 POINTS - EXPERIENTIAL CRITERIA OF C.C.
on 1/7/06 3:41 PM, Sal Sunshine at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, okay. But do we each get a gold crown?
Plastic. But for a million, you get gold.
Sal
On Jan 7, 2006, at 3:21 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
Praise
--Interesting. TM and its practice is like laying bare an open
field, with trash strewn on the field needing collection and
disposal. Personally, I use various karma busting mantras designed
for the disposal operations, namely the Mahavritunjaya mantra and a
concise form of the Surangama
--More specific details of the techniques mentioned below may be
found in a new book coming out in March, by Norbu Rinpoche, published
by Snow Lion Press. Contact Snow Lion in a few months.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jan 7, 2006, at 12:59 PM,
Would Maharishi give us a title of 'Knight'.?? 50,000-/ dollars might be enough for that.??OriginalMessage- From: "Rick Archer" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sat, 07 Jan 2006 16:53:45 -0600 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 20 POINTS - EXPERIENTIA
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 20 POINTS - EXPERIENTIAL CRITERIA OF C.C.
on 1/7/06 5:12 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would Maharishi give us a title of 'Knight'.?? 50,000-/ dollars might be enough for that.??
I dont know if he would, but youre giving me ideas
--I can just see it: the Knights TM-Plar...but watch out for the Pope.
- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
on 1/7/06 5:12 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Would Maharishi give us a title of 'Knight'.?? 50,000-/
dollars might be
Mahesh is the Vedic Pope. Where you been?:-)On Jan 7, 2006, at 6:24 PM, coshlnx wrote:--I can just see it: the "Knights TM-Plar"...but watch out for the Pope.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This
--- Vaj wrote:
IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
transformation to uproot vasanas.
Patrick wrote:
Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led to
investigations into ways to uproot those vasanas. Others have
been blacklisted from the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Vaj wrote:
IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
transformation to uproot vasanas.
Patrick wrote:
Another recurrent theme of this list. For some of us, TM led
to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Vaj wrote:
IMO, TM as a method does not work on the level of
transformation to uproot vasanas.
Patrick
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
It makes me think I'm in CC.
Is that important to you?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ~--
Join modern day disciples reach the disfigured and poor with hope and healing
on 1/7/06 2:18 PM, a_non_moose_ff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course the humor and silliness in all of the above pales to the
One(s) who proclaims to BE Brahman and to see Brahamn in all things -
- and then turns around calls people pissing skunks and that they
should eat shit and die
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Handed out on one of the TTCs. I think La Antilla
Thanks Rick! One of the best posts I've seen on FFL. Really clearly
defined, well written indicators.
20 POINTS - EXPERIENTIAL CRITERIA OF C.C.
1) Spontaneity -
Not La Antilla. I love how Jim and I have opposite
responses to this post! (Hehehehe)
--- jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Handed out on one of the TTCs. I think La Antilla
Thanks Rick! One of the best
55 matches
Mail list logo
