> > > > So, most mantra meditation is TM and has been TM for
> > > > centuries.
> > > >
> > > The other way around: TM is just a form "yogic meditation"
> > > which has been taught for centuries.
> > >
Richard J. Williams wrote:
> > So, TM is yogic meditation that has been taught for centuries.
Richard J. Williams wrote:
>>> So, most mantra meditation is TM and has been TM for
>>> centuries.
>>>
>>>
> Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> The other way around: TM is just a form "yogic meditation"
>> which has been taught for centuries.
>>
>>
> So, TM is yogic meditation that has been taug
> > So, most mantra meditation is TM and has been TM for
> > centuries.
> >
Bhairitu wrote:
> The other way around: TM is just a form "yogic meditation"
> which has been taught for centuries.
>
So, TM is yogic meditation that has been taught for centuries.
Richard J. Williams wrote:
> Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> Most mantra meditation does not vary from TM much
>> at all because TM meditation was borrowed from the
>> way mantra meditation has been taught for centuries
>> (but with different mantras for you nitpickers).
>>
>>
> So, most mantra
Bhairitu wrote:
> Most mantra meditation does not vary from TM much
> at all because TM meditation was borrowed from the
> way mantra meditation has been taught for centuries
> (but with different mantras for you nitpickers).
>
So, most mantra meditation is TM and has been TM for
centuries.
Thanks Bairitu,
I agree about TM Teachers being too slap dash with the mantra.
When I was initiated,I sat down the next day to do my morning
meditation,could not think of my mantra,rang my teacher in a
panic,he calmly said he would check it at the afternoon first day
follow up.
He was a nice ol
At a subtler level as with any mantra meditation you're not going to be
able to tell what exactly the pronunciation is. You'll always start
with the mantra clearly and a good teacher will make sure you have the
correct understanding of the pronunciation (it's too slap dash in TM).
Just like T
Hi Bhairitu,
Does it matter if the pronounciation of a longer mantra changes as
it becomes more refined ,just as ones TM Mantra changes when
meditating effortlessly.
Namaste,
Billy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> biosoundbill wrote:
> > Bhairitu,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> MMY has always said, we teach knowledge of the infinite, not infinite
> knowledge. The TMO, if it wanted to be in the job of teaching
> infinite knowledge, could certainly get into a long and involved
> discussion
I'll keep the basic TM technique and forget the rest,thanks Bob.
Namaste,
Billy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill"
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Okay Bob,if that's the case why not one mantra for eve
I really hope that what you are saying is true.I'm not questioning
your sincerity. I just don't trust the TMO!
Something is going on,I have no doubt as I'm having brilliant
meditations lately,transcending on a very regular basis.
Thanks Bob,
Namaste,
Billy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.co
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Okay Bob,if that's the case why not one mantra for everyone?
>
> And don't give me the answer that a proper thought needs to be
> selected for each individual as per Science of Being and art of
> living from
Okay Bob,if that's the case why not one mantra for everyone?
And don't give me the answer that a proper thought needs to be
selected for each individual as per Science of Being and art of
living from p50 on.
As a technique,TM works briliantly for me,but I think the mantra
coverup was a jo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
You will find a
> few of the 'meaningless sounds' used by TM
*
The meaningless sounds used in TM are indeed meaningless sounds because
that is the proper use of the mantra in TM. If a thought of meani
On Oct 22, 2007, at 5:46 PM, bob_brigante wrote:
> What, exactly, is a bija mantra anyway?
> >
> > Do bija mantras always have to be recieved in one-on-one
> > initiation from a genuine tantric guru? Are bija mantras
> > effective if you find them in a book?
> >
> > Why all the secrecy about b
According to this guy Gabriel,who has Swami Muktananda in his
lineage, the repetition of a Biijamantra linked to a particular
deity will develop in a person the qualities and attributes embodied
by that very deity.They are all doubtless auspicious and will grant
the best fruits to you provided
> What, exactly, is a bija mantra anyway?
> >
> > Do bija mantras always have to be recieved in one-on-one
> > initiation from a genuine tantric guru? Are bija mantras
> > effective if you find them in a book?
> >
> > Why all the secrecy about bija mantras?
> >
>
***
The thing about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The question is, where do the TM bija mantras come from?
According to Swami Yogananda from the vibrations of the spinal chakras
which, incidentally also make up the Sanskrit (Devanagari) alphabet.
Fifty peta
What, exactly, is a bija mantra anyway?
>
> Do bija mantras always have to be recieved in one-on-one
> initiation from a genuine tantric guru? Are bija mantras
> effective if you find them in a book?
>
> Why all the secrecy about bija mantras?
>
I think by getting an initiation from from a TM T
biosoundbill wrote:
> After all is said and done, I can't complain about
> the way I was taught to meditate in TM, or even about
> the mantra I got, meaningless or otherwise.
>
But I didn't say that your mantra was "meaningless".
According to several informants here, you got the nick
name of a H
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nablusoss1008 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > > For me, no effort or will whatsoever is involved.
> > > The whole
After all is said and done, I can't complain about the way I was
taught to meditate in TM, or even about the mantra I got,
meaningless or otherwise. It works for me, and even though the
organization that propagates TM has become ultra commercial, the
technique still holds good. So I won't distr
BillyG wrote:
> I can see the clueless nitwit now, with his Sony laptop
> under the bridge posting to FFL using wireless satellite
> (or stealing the signal from others). :-)
>
You idiot, Murphy - I have an Apple MacBook Pro! The connection
is free - no bridges. But I am a nitwit to ask where th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sal Sunshine wrote:
> > --anyone who doesn't know that "bija mantras" are
> > used in TM
> >
> So, Sal, where do you think the TM bija mantras come from?
>
> > is a clueless nitwit who lives under a bridg
Vaj wrote:
>
> On Oct 21, 2007, at 11:24 PM, BillyG. wrote:
>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >
>> >
>> > On Oct 21, 2007, at 9:43 PM, BillyG. wrote:
>> >
>> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > In the Hindu yogic traditi
biosoundbill wrote:
> In the text below you appear to be admitting that
> bija mantras are used in TM!
>
> Why the sudden change of mind,are you a little
> confused?
>
No, I am not confused, but it would seem that several of the
informants here are confused, or at least ill-informed, and
are at
Sal Sunshine wrote:
> --anyone who doesn't know that "bija mantras" are
> used in TM
>
So, Sal, where do you think the TM bija mantras come from?
> is a clueless nitwit who lives under a bridge.
>
> If you are so smart, why don't tell us the name of the
> tantric guru that taught them to the M
biosoundbill wrote:
> > Why the sudden change of mind,are you a little confused?
> >
jstein wrote:
> Billy...Richard lives under a bridge.
>
Stop the lying, Judy. You know perfectly well that I live at
Radiance, the TM Ideal Village, just outside Austin, Texas.
Why you'd want to spread falsehoods
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
>
>
>
> > For me, no effort or will whatsoever is involved.
> > The whole thing is automatic, completely
> > spontaneous. *Samyama* involves effort, but no
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Is there any evidence of this? Folks have measured the length of
sojourn in TC? Wouldn't that also depend on the individual, on length
of practice and predisposition, to name just a few of the possible
varia
On Oct 22, 2007, at 10:34 AM, BillyG. wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For me, no effort or will whatsoever is involved.
> The whole thing is automatic, completely
> spontaneous. *Samyama* involves effort, but not
> dhyan.
TM is Samyama! E
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's also not unusual for people to have imbalanced awakenings, esp.
> people working indiscriminately with sexual practices. This is also
> somewhat common among TMSP practitioners. It is important to have
> guidance in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For me, no effort or will whatsoever is involved.
> The whole thing is automatic, completely
> spontaneous. *Samyama* involves effort, but not
> dhyan.
TM is Samyama! Effortless Dharana (poorly translated as
concen
On Oct 22, 2007, at 10:10 AM, BillyG. wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some people will have carried an awakening from a previous life, so
> it's impossible to tell those who were previously awakened or if
they
> awakened from their practice in t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some people will have carried an awakening from a previous life, so
> it's impossible to tell those who were previously awakened or if they
> awakened from their practice in this life without investigating. But
> usually
On Oct 21, 2007, at 11:24 PM, BillyG. wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 21, 2007, at 9:43 PM, BillyG. wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > > In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the "gap" or
> > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So then, what's the difference? the transcendence is the
transcendent, right? If it had a sign in it that said, "I'm a better
transcendent than the one you get with iddy-biddy mantras" then that
wouldn't be the t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
> Bhairitu,
>
> I meant to ask you as you meditate with a longer mantra
> effortlessly,are you able to let go completely as in TM where the
> bija can become very faint,unclear, and barely recognizable.Are you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> On Oct 21, 2007, at 9:43 PM, BillyG. wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > > In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the "gap" or
> > > transcendent in TM speak is only just the begi
The proof of the pudding is in the eating.
Angela Mailander wrote:
> Is there any evidence of this? Folks have measured the length of sojourn in
> TC? Wouldn't that also depend on the individual, on length of practice and
> predisposition, to name just a few of the possible variables? a
>
> Bh
On Oct 21, 2007, at 10:03 PM, BillyG. wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the "gap" or
> > transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginn
On Oct 21, 2007, at 9:43 PM, BillyG. wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the "gap" or
> transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
> truly transcendental consciousness, it's merely a
On Oct 21, 2007, at 9:41 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the "gap" or
> transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
> truly transcendental consciousness, it's merel
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> > >
> > > In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the "gap" or
> > > transcendent in TM speak
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> > In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the "gap" or
> > transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
> > truly transcendental c
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the "gap" or
> transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
> truly transcendental consciousness, it's merely a thought-free state.
> It is however an im
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the "gap" or
> transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
> truly transcendental consciousness, it's merely a thought-free
> state. It is however an imp
In the Hindu yogic tradition I practiced in, the "gap" or
transcendent in TM speak is only just the beginning...and it's not
truly transcendental consciousness, it's merely a thought-free state.
It is however an important sign that practice is ready to go to
another level, one where the tra
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> So then, what's the difference? the transcendence is the
> transcendent, right?
I think the point is that some are trying to say
that what many TMers think is the transcdenant
isn't really.
I do not choose to
Is there any evidence of this? Folks have measured the length of sojourn in
TC? Wouldn't that also depend on the individual, on length of practice and
predisposition, to name just a few of the possible variables? a
Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: About $4000.
About $4000. :)
And you stay in the transcendent longer.
Angela Mailander wrote:
> So then, what's the difference? the transcendence is the transcendent, right?
> If it had a sign in it that said, "I'm a better transcendent than the one
> you get with iddy-biddy mantras" then that wouldn't be
So then, what's the difference? the transcendence is the transcendent, right?
If it had a sign in it that said, "I'm a better transcendent than the one you
get with iddy-biddy mantras" then that wouldn't be the transcendent, would it? a
Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
biosoundbill wrote:
> Bhairitu,
>
> I meant to ask you as you meditate with a longer mantra
> effortlessly,are you able to let go completely as in TM where the
> bija can become very faint,unclear, and barely recognizable.Are you
> able to allow a longer mantra to become very faint,unclear, and
Bhairitu,
I meant to ask you as you meditate with a longer mantra
effortlessly,are you able to let go completely as in TM where the
bija can become very faint,unclear, and barely recognizable.Are you
able to allow a longer mantra to become very faint,unclear, and
barely recognizable also?
>F
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> On Oct 20, 2007, at 7:26 PM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill"
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Richard,
> >>
> >> In the text below you appear to be admitting that bija mantras
a
On Oct 20, 2007, at 7:26 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Hi Richard,
In the text below you appear to be admitting that bija mantras are
used in TM!
Why the sudden change of mind,are you a little confused?
Billy...Richar
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> In the text below you appear to be admitting that bija mantras are
> used in TM!
>
> Why the sudden change of mind,are you a little confused?
Billy...Richard lives under a bridge.
> Namaste,
Hi Richard,
In the text below you appear to be admitting that bija mantras are
used in TM!
Why the sudden change of mind,are you a little confused?
Namaste,
Billy
> [FairfieldLife] Re: Did MMY's Guru Dev teach TM? Anybody
> know.
> Richard J. Williams
> Sun, 21 Jan 2007 09:55:44 -08
matrixmonitor wrote:
> The Mahareeshee was by No means a sexual deviate!
> He simply had normal sexual relationships, (encounters)
> with various females.
>
So, how would you be knowing anything about the Marshy's
personal sex life?
> What's wrong with that?
>
Did I say it was wrong? I just sa
Richard J. Williams wrote:
> Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> Don't feed the troll. Don't take mantra knowledge
>> from a troll. Enough said.
>>
>>
> Fuck you, Mr. Bharat2 - when you unsubscribe to ComCast
> get back to us. Is it alright with you, Sir, if I dialog
> with Bill, for just 1 minute, with
---The Mahareeshee was by No means a sexual deviate!. He simply had
normal sexual relationships, (encounters) with various females.
What's wrong with that?
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> biosoundbill wrote:
> > Richard are you saying tha
biosoundbill wrote:
> Richard are you saying that the TM mantras are
> not Tantric Bija Mantras?
>
Bill - The so-called TM bija mantras are just common
everyday words from the Sanskrit dictionary. They can
be found in almost any standard Sanskrit lexicon. For
example, Ram, Sri, Nama...nothing
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Don't feed the troll. Don't take mantra knowledge from a troll.
Enough said.
>
> You would have to be both deaf and blind to not know bij mantras
growing
> up in India. :)
>
>
> biosoundbill wrote:
> > Richard,
> >
kaladevi93 wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> A longer mantra cultures the mind at deeper levels. The short bij
>> mantra bobs up and down. It is not like a rock but more like a
>> basketball being dribbled. But the longer mantra keeps
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > Probably not one person, in the whole history of mankind,
> > > has ever been enlightened by repeating gibberish.
> > >
> BillyG wrote:
> > You mean the powerful goo-goo gaa-gaa mantra? Agreed!
> >
> Acco
Don't feed the troll. Don't take mantra knowledge from a troll. Enough said.
You would have to be both deaf and blind to not know bij mantras growing
up in India. :)
biosoundbill wrote:
> Richard,
>
> Most of the TM mantras are listed in the Varada Tantra.
>
> I believe MMY played around with t
Richard are you saying that the TM mantras are not Tantric Bija
Mantras?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> biosoundbill wrote:
> > Most of the TM mantras are listed in the Varada Tantra.
> >
> Maybe so, but Varada is the mudra of Ratnasa
biosoundbill wrote:
> Most of the TM mantras are listed in the Varada Tantra.
>
Maybe so, but Varada is the mudra of Ratnasambhava, the
third Dhyani Buddha. The Varada Tantra was composed long
after the advent of Buddhist Tantras. The TM mantras are
enumerated in the Saundaryalahari ascribed to
Richard,
I disagree with you, I'm not attacking you, and I'm just agreeing to
differ.
I think MMY should decide on which version of the Tantric mantras he
wishes to use.
Either the `M' endings or the `ng' endings.
He should have each new initiate complete a detailed questionnaire
under the s
Richard,
Most of the TM mantras are listed in the Varada Tantra.
I believe MMY played around with them a little to dilute their
power, like making Kriing into ki-ring, Shriing into shir-ing,
Hriing into Hi-ring, shyam into she-am, etc
He really went to town on Saraswati aing,ainga,aim,and aima
> > Probably not one person, in the whole history of mankind,
> > has ever been enlightened by repeating gibberish.
> >
BillyG wrote:
> You mean the powerful goo-goo gaa-gaa mantra? Agreed!
>
According to Marshy, it is NOT the technique that causes
the enlightened state. The Light is already there,
Bhairitu wrote:
> The short bij mantra bobs up and down.
>
There seems to be some confusion here. Marshy doesn't
give out 'bija' mantras, only the names of the devatas,
the deified heroes of the Hindu tradition, along with
various words and phrases from Sanskrit. Marshy isn't
a tantric yogi i
biosoundbill wrote:
> I fully understand what the word 'Sri' and sometimes
> 'Shri' means, it's used as a respectful affix to
> mantras etc.
>
All I wanted to point out, Bill, is that you have not
included any actual tantric bija mantras - you've just
been posting words and phrases found in an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill"
> wrote:
> >
> > I think that the advanced techniques in TM where additional
> > syllables are added to the mantra are not as powerful as the basic
> > TM techn
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Bhairitu wrote:
> > My guru has had to undo the damage that people got
> > from just picking up some mantra from a book.
> >
> Apparently your guru is a mere retired pilot from the
> Indian Air Force - hardl
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> biosoundbill wrote:
> > From your experience, am I correct in saying that
> > `Om Shreem Maha Lakshmiyei Swaha' would be the most
> > powerful of all 3 meditation mantras?
> >
> Strictly speaking, none of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A longer mantra cultures the mind at deeper levels. The short bij
> mantra bobs up and down. It is not like a rock but more like a
> basketball being dribbled. But the longer mantra keeps you at a deep
> level for lo
Hi Richard,
Lets agree to differ.
I fully understand what the word 'Sri' and sometimes 'Shri' means,
it's used as a respectful affix to mantras etc.
In the mantra Om Shrim Mahalakshmiyei Swaha
Rough Translation: 'Om and salutations to that feminine energy which
bestows all manner of wealth, a
Sal Sunshine wrote:
> U, oh, here we go again..."Muh HAR shee" anyone?? :)
>
Uh, no, it's Marshy, Sal.
> > It's not Shri, but Shreem which is the way they
> pronounce the Bija shrIM in the South of India.
> >
> > It's Shring or sometimes Shrim (thats 'sh'and rim
> > as in the rim of a wheel) i
biosoundbill wrote:
> It's not Shri, but Shreem which is the way they
> pronounce the Bija shrIM in the South of India.
>
The Sanskrit word Shri is not a bija mantra, Bill,
that was my point, anyway you pronpounce it. It's a
word found in most standard Sanskrit lexicons - it's
a common name us
On Oct 18, 2007, at 2:56 PM, biosoundbill wrote:
It's not Shri, but Shreem which is the way they pronounce the Bija
shrIM in the South of India.
It's Shring or sometimes Shrim(thats 'sh'and rim as in the rim of a
wheel)in the North of India.
U, oh, here we go again..."Muh HAR shee" anyone?? :
It's not Shri, but Shreem which is the way they pronounce the Bija
shrIM in the South of India.
It's Shring or sometimes Shrim(thats 'sh'and rim as in the rim of a
wheel)in the North of India.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard J. Williams"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> biosoundbi
BillyG. wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill"
>>
> wrote:
>
>>> I think that the advanced techniques in TM where additional
>>> syllables are added to the mantra are not as powerful
Bhairitu wrote:
> My guru has had to undo the damage that people got
> from just picking up some mantra from a book.
>
Apparently your guru is a mere retired pilot from the
Indian Air Force - hardly someone who would be knowing
anything about Tantricism in downtown Oakland.
In fact ALL bija mant
biosoundbill wrote:
> From your experience, am I correct in saying that
> `Om Shreem Maha Lakshmiyei Swaha' would be the most
> powerful of all 3 meditation mantras?
>
Strictly speaking, none of these phrases you mention
are actual bija mantras. Shri is an Sanskrit honorific;
Maha is Sanskrit fo
kaladevi93 wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Namaskaram Kala Devi,
>>
>> I'll use a non TM mantra as an example!
>>
>> Let's say the bija is `Shreem' for the basic TM technique.
>>
>> Let's say `Om Shreem Namaha' for an advanced tech
Thnaks Kala
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill"
wrote:
> >
> > Namaskaram Kala Devi,
> >
> > I'll use a non TM mantra as an example!
> >
> > Let's say the bija is `Shreem' for the basic TM techniq
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Namaskaram Kala Devi,
>
> I'll use a non TM mantra as an example!
>
> Let's say the bija is `Shreem' for the basic TM technique.
>
> Let's say `Om Shreem Namaha' for an advanced technique.
>
> Finally let's say
Namaskaram Kala Devi,
I'll use a non TM mantra as an example!
Let's say the bija is `Shreem' for the basic TM technique.
Let's say `Om Shreem Namaha' for an advanced technique.
Finally let's say `Om Shreem Maha Lakshmiyei Swaha' for a more
advanced technique.
>From your experience, am I corre
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "BillyG." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill"
> wrote:
> > >
> > > I think that the advanced techniques in TM where additional
> > > syllables are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill"
wrote:
> >
> > I think that the advanced techniques in TM where additional
> > syllables are added to the mantra are not as powerful as the basic
> > TM technique.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "biosoundbill" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> I think that the advanced techniques in TM where additional
> syllables are added to the mantra are not as powerful as the basic
> TM technique.
>
Advanced techniques cost the same as TM ($2,500 I think) and ther
92 matches
Mail list logo
