Look, I'm no big fan of McCain, but Obama?
(snip)
With all of this talk of the evolution of meditation, and
dissonance
and consonance;
Don't you hear something in his voice that is harmonizing?
Don't you get the feeling that he knows we have to come together
in
order to get
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, R.G. babajii_99@ wrote:
(snip)
Look, I'm no big fan of McCain, but Obama?
(snip)
With all of this talk of the evolution of meditation, and dissonance
and
Look, I'm no big fan of McCain, but Obama?
(snip)
With all of this talk of the evolution of meditation, and
dissonance
and consonance;
Don't you hear something in his voice that is harmonizing?
Lord Humungus from The Road Warrior had the most harmonizing voice.
(snip)
Thangs tend to be weirdly interconnected. In this case,
if Lewis Hamilton wins F1 Champion ship this year, that
could mean BHO's gonna be the next persident of the US of A! :D
http://www.lewishamilton.com/about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:45 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
Thirdly, drugs. That was the era when drugs became fashionable.
What's so good about that?
We found out we were being lied to? :
NO ASSOCIATION AT ALL...EVEN A
Vaj and new_morning_blank_slate (and MDixon for that matter):
Fall all over yourselves in your apparent rush to defend drug use,
even something as seemingly innoculous as marijuana. You'll make
yourselves look foolish all by yourselves without any help from me.
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:45 PM, shempmcgurk wrote:
Thirdly, drugs. That was the era when drugs became fashionable.
What's so good
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Vaj and new_morning_blank_slate (and MDixon for that matter):
Fall all over yourselves in your apparent rush to defend drug use,
even something as seemingly innoculous as marijuana. You'll make
yourselves look
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Vaj and new_morning_blank_slate (and MDixon for that matter):
Fall all over yourselves in your apparent rush to defend drug
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Vaj and new_morning_blank_slate (and MDixon for that matter):
Fall all over yourselves in your apparent rush to defend drug
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted
here many times.
But there's nothing -- absolutely no reason -- for
participants on a spiritual site to have any suggestions
in their minds that drugs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Vaj and new_morning_blank_slate (and MDixon for that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted
here many times.
But there's nothing -- absolutely no reason -- for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Vaj and new_morning_blank_slate (and MDixon for that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted
here many times.
But there's nothing -- absolutely no reason -- for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@ wrote:
I am for the full legalisation of drugs, as I've posted
here many
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
I'm all for myth-busting. But I'm also for common sense.
Great! Do you have the date set for the big plunge? (when you plan to
start
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
I'm all for myth-busting. But I'm also for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Without reading it, I am guessing that the Buddhists who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Without reading it, I am guessing that the Buddhists who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
markmeredith@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate
no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
Without reading it, I am guessing that the Buddhists who
wrote the
above tract are on a par -- at least rationally -- with the
pedophile party.
Oh my. Equating spiritual use of ganja with pedaphiles. This
has got
to be the lowest form of Non Sequitur on FFL yet.
26 matches
Mail list logo
