[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-03 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I wonder about this "meaningless sounds" business. At the > > preparatory lecture, I always used to say the mantras were "sounds >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-03 Thread Jason Spock
and has very little say in TMO.   ---OriginalMessage-- From: "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 18:10:41 -0600 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh     on 11/2/05 1:29 PM, Jason Spock  wrote:        I'm afraid

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-03 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wonder about this "meaningless sounds" business. At the preparatory > lecture, I always used to say the mantras were "sounds the effects of which > are known," or "words selected for their sound quality," or som

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-03 Thread authfriend
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wonder about this "meaningless sounds" business. At the > preparatory lecture, I always used to say the mantras were "sounds > the effects of which are known," or "words selected for their sound > quality," or som

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-03 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Imitation TM? What would that be, exactly? Giving out phony mantras? > You know, something like the names of Hindu gods and goddesses, > disguised as meaningless sounds? I see what you mean. > > Sal > > > On

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-03 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I wonder about this "meaningless sounds" business. At the preparatory > lecture, I always used to say the mantras were "sounds the effects of which > are known," or "words selected for their sound quality," or som

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-03 Thread feste37
I wonder about this "meaningless sounds" business. At the preparatory lecture, I always used to say the mantras were "sounds the effects of which are known," or "words selected for their sound quality," or something like that. I never said, "meaningless sounds" and I wonder whether using tha

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-03 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Imitation TM? What would that be, exactly? Giving out phony mantras? > You know, something like the names of Hindu gods and goddesses, > disguised as meaningless sounds? I see what you mean. > > Sal > We c

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-03 Thread Sal Sunshine
Imitation TM? What would that be, exactly? Giving out phony mantras? You know, something like the names of Hindu gods and goddesses, disguised as meaningless sounds? I see what you mean. Sal On Nov 2, 2005, at 8:47 PM, jyouells2000 wrote: Bob,   Do you know that the judges are teaching i

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 11/2/05 6:18 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > >All the current dysfunctionalization of the TMO outside of India > > is intentional -- only India counts from here on out, because only > > India can sup

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Rick Archer
on 11/2/05 6:18 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >All the current dysfunctionalization of the TMO outside of India > is intentional -- only India counts from here on out, because only > India can support the revival of Vedic civilization. You don't think the Indian TMO is dysfunctional?

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroup

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread jyouells2000
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.c

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 11/2/05 5:10 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >> Sounds like Jaime Grant. Yeah, you're right.>> > > > > > > Since when is Jamie Grant x-MUM? > > There was a big faculty purge a year or t

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > MMY has said something that Dillbeck interprets a > > certain way. > > Farrokh refuses to go along with what MMY has said. > > The REAL issue > > is: is Dillbeck right a

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoog

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Rick Archer
on 11/2/05 6:09 PM, bbrigante at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > ** > > Not too long after he praised democracy in the MUM Review: > > http://geocities.com/bbrigante/index.html#demomemo That could very well have gotten him canned. The common denominator of those who were booted was that

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Rick Archer
on 11/2/05 5:10 PM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> Sounds like Jaime Grant. Yeah, you're right.>> > > > Since when is Jamie Grant x-MUM? There was a big faculty purge a year or two ago. Jaime, Sam James, and others. Yahoo! Groups Sponsor ---

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Rick Archer
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh on 11/2/05 1:29 PM, Jason Spock at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:  I'm afraid I have to disagree with you Rick Archer.   That’s OK. As far as I know, Maharishi has absolutely no control over his organisation. Back when I worked closely

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > on 11/2/05 12:19 PM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bbrigante <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 11/2/05 12:19 PM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > wrote: > >> > >> on 11/2/05 10:44 AM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECT

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > on 11/2/05 10:44 AM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > > So if Maharishi called Farrokh to Holland or ca

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:26:14 -0500 > > > To: Raja Michael Dillbeck > > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > From: Farro

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:26:14 -0500 > > To: Raja Michael Dillbeck > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: Farrokh & Ruffina Anklesaria > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Your activities > > > > You and

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Jason Spock
ticle.       I just copied and pasted it.   ---OriginalMessage-- From: "Rick Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  Date: Wed, 02 Nov 2005 09:42:07 -0600 Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh    Patrick Gillam at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Perha

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Rick Archer
on 11/2/05 12:19 PM, anonymousff at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> >> on 11/2/05 10:44 AM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: >> >>> So if Maharishi called Farrokh to Holland or called him on the > phone >>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread anonymousff
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 11/2/05 10:44 AM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > So if Maharishi called Farrokh to Holland or called him on the phone > > and said , you should charge 2,500 for every instruction and you > >

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Rick Archer
on 11/2/05 10:44 AM, off_world_beings at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > So if Maharishi called Farrokh to Holland or called him on the phone > and said , you should charge 2,500 for every instruction and you > should get recertified, do you think he would accept Maharishi's > instruction.as a devo

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 11/2/05 5:53 AM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >> Great letter! I just sent Farrokh an email of > >> appreciation and > >> thanks for his clarity and telling the truth. Good > >> for him! Dillbeck > >>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:26:14 -0500 > > To: Raja Michael Dillbeck > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: Farrokh & Ruffina Anklesaria > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Your activities > > > > You and

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:26:14 -0500 > > To: Raja Michael Dillbeck > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > From: Farrokh & Ruffina Anklesaria > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Subject: Re: Your activities > > > > You and

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Rick Archer
on 11/2/05 8:21 AM, Patrick Gillam at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:26:14 -0500 >> To: Raja Michael Dillbeck >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> From: Farrokh & Ruffina Anklesaria >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> Subject: Re: Your activities >> >> You and your cohorts should not both

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread L B Shriver
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 11/1/05 10:51 PM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Rick, do you know why Bevan stopped Judge Anklesaria > > from coming to the conference? I wonder what the > > stated reason was. > > Farrokh is not a judge

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 11/2/05 5:53 AM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> > >> Great letter! I just sent Farrokh an email of > >> appreciation and > >> thanks for his clarity and telling the truth. Good > >> for him! Dillbeck > >>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Rick Archer
on 11/2/05 5:53 AM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> >> Great letter! I just sent Farrokh an email of >> appreciation and >> thanks for his clarity and telling the truth. Good >> for him! Dillbeck >> sounds like a bozo. > > Actually, Michael Dillbeck is one of the nicer people > in the TMO.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Rick Archer
on 11/2/05 5:49 AM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> MMY has said something that Dillbeck interprets a >> certain way. >> Farrokh refuses to go along with what MMY has said. >> The REAL issue >> is: is Dillbeck right about what MMY has said or is >>

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > --- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Farrokh Anklesaria has been running the > > "Enlightened Sentencing > >

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Farrokh Anklesaria has been runnin

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Patrick Gillam
> Date: Thu, 06 Oct 2005 08:26:14 -0500 > To: Raja Michael Dillbeck > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > From: Farrokh & Ruffina Anklesaria > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Subject: Re: Your activities > > You and your cohorts should not bother to call us unless you have > been specifically instructed by Maharish

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread markmeredith2002
Jerry Jarvis was tangentially involved in the St. Louis project and I predicted yrs ago that Bevan would try to shut it down to prevent a potential rebirth of Jerry as a mov't leader after MMY goes. PS - MMY wasn't at the Mahalakshmi broadcast yesterday indicating that he must be pretty ill. PSS

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Peter
--- jim_flanegin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Farrokh Anklesaria has been running the > "Enlightened Sentencing > Project" in > > St. Louis from its inception. This is the program > in which judges > senten

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-02 Thread Peter
--- sparaig <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > MMY has said something that Dillbeck interprets a > certain way. > Farrokh refuses to go along with what MMY has said. > The REAL issue > is: is Dillbeck right about what MMY has said or is > Farrokh doing the > right thing? > > Or can they both someh

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-01 Thread Robert Gimbel
It is encouraging to see someone rise above the; The 'Politics of the Ashram'. And inspiring to hear someone actually taking action; To teach people to meditate; Particularly people in trouble, imprisoned. I don't think we are here to 'run the world' Running the world is purely a concept of the eg

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-01 Thread Ingegerd
Bravo Farrokh! It is good that he stand up and fight for his rights. I like what he says about - when the TMO is not capable to run a small University - how can they rule the world?. Ingegerd --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Farrokh Anklesaria has

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-01 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > on 11/1/05 10:51 PM, Peter at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Rick, do you know why Bevan stopped Judge Anklesaria > > from coming to the conference? I wonder what the > > stated reason was. > > Farrokh is not a judg

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-01 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jim_flanegin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Farrokh Anklesaria has been running the "Enlightened Sentencing > Project" in > > St. Louis from its inception. This is the p

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-01 Thread sparaig
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Farrokh Anklesaria has been running the "Enlightened Sentencing Project" in > St. Louis from its inception. This is the program in which judges sentence > people to practice TM. A while back a conference was organiz

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-01 Thread jim_flanegin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Farrokh Anklesaria has been running the "Enlightened Sentencing Project" in > St. Louis from its inception. This is the program in which judges sentence > people to practice TM. A while back a conference was organiz

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-01 Thread bbrigante
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Rick, do you know why Bevan stopped Judge Anklesaria > from coming to the conference? I wonder what the > stated reason was. > Farrokh Anklesaria is not a judge -- he was a British lawyer: http://fair

[FairfieldLife] Re: Letter from Farrokh

2005-11-01 Thread off_world_beings
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Farrokh Anklesaria has been running the "Enlightened Sentencing Project" in > St. Louis from its inception. This is the program in which judges sentence > people to practice TM. A while back a conference was organiz