On 4/9/2014 1:54 PM, Share Long wrote:
Judy, it sounds like you're saying that Richard has zero redeeming
qualities. Is that what you're saying?
It's probably been at least ten years or more since I had an online
conversation with Judy, and that probably a good thing.
I started posting
Says Richard, proving he's a dishonest troll. None of what he says below is
accurate.
It's probably been at least ten years or more since I had an online
conversation with Judy, and that probably a good thing.
I started posting around 2000 to Google Groups and she didn't post any
On 4/9/2014 10:06 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:
I'm not sure that Richard is so concerned about being taken seriously
a lot of the time. Sometimes, but not as often as some other people
who want to be taken seriously ALL the time. Go figure!
That's excellent Share! Once again, you've
Hey Richard, I like the pictures you've posted of yourself. My favorite
was
the one from when you worked as a reporter,
If anyone wants to make lot's of money, go into commissioned sales.
[image: Inline image 1]
On Wed, Apr 9, 2014 at 11:03 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com wrote:
Hey Richard,
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 4/9/2014 10:49 PM, authfriend@... mailto:authfriend@... wrote:
Had nothing to do with your lie about Hillary, Richard. I've always found you
an excruciatingly boring troll.
You need to stop the lying, Judy. Calling someone
On 4/10/2014 9:02 AM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:
You need to stop the lying, Judy. Calling someone a troll makes
assumptions about a writer's motives that are impossible to
determine. The term troll is highly subjective, and some posts
will look like trolling to some while
On 4/10/2014 8:29 AM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Says Richard, proving he's a dishonest troll. None of what he says
below is accurate.
We could look it up - the search engine on Google Groups works good.
But, I already posted the link to Yahoo Groups message from Robin where
you
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 4/10/2014 9:02 AM, awoelflebater@... mailto:awoelflebater@... wrote:
You need to stop the lying, Judy. Calling someone a troll makes assumptions
about a writer's motives that are impossible to determine. The term troll is
Jesus Christ, this makes me smile!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
Hey Richard, I like the pictures you've posted of yourself. My favorite was
the one from when you worked as a reporter,
If anyone wants to make lot's of money, go into commissioned sales.
: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 8:39 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
Sounds like an interesting book. Shame about the appalling title. I think the
tagline should read:
One Man's Escape from Insanity' is the story of Shuvender Sem, who, 10 years
later, we are now going
and stay aren't going to be such a big draw.
But they won't backfire either...
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 8:39 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
Sounds like an interesting book
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
The trouble with TM I think, is all the BS you get taught about it. Maybe it's
different now but in my day TM
From: TurquoiseBee turquoi...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent
Gosh, Barry, hate to break it to ya, but people DID notice that Sem was acting
crazy for some time before he cracked. And OF COURSE everyone at MUM was
terribly upset by the murder.
Opsie!
You really need to get your fantasies under control. It isn't the fact that
you talk about
On 4/9/2014 3:57 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
almost everyone around you is a mass of neuroses and weirdness, with a
few touches of psychosis on the side.
The yogic flying demonstrations at MUM pale in comparison to the
demonstrations by Rama when he was up on stage levitating in front of a
large
I don't believe Barry knew Robin when he was crazy 25-35 years ago, so he isn't
in a position to say that he was obviously crazy. In any case, by the time
Robin appeared on FFL, he'd long since recovered (and become an enemy of TM,
which you'd think Barry would approve of).
What else, after
no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 8:39 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
Sounds like an interesting book. Shame about the appalling title. I think the
tagline should read:
One Man's Escape from Insanity
As far as I'm concerned the Turq was in one cult only. The cult of the Buddhist
Rama, a confused individual who later killed himself by drowning wearing a
dog-collar around his neck.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 9:45 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
The trouble with TM I think, is all the BS you
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: TurquoiseBee turquoiseb@...
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Wednesday, April 9, 2014 10:57 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
From: salyavin808 no_re
On 4/9/2014 1:03 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
Well, a lot of evidence suggests that schizophrenia can become worse
with stress, so even in schizophrenics, TM, under proper supervision,
might be beneficial to at least some people.
I don't buy it. Sure, TM might be good at lowering stress levels in
On 4/9/2014 1:03 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
maybe there are times during the day in depression or during the
non-psychotic part of schizophrenia that it might be useful if
practised gingerly.
Meditation is defined as simply to think things over. Based on this
definition, anyone who thinks can
Duh.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 4/9/2014 1:03 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
Well, a lot of evidence suggests that schizophrenia can become worse with
stress, so even in schizophrenics, TM, under proper supervision, might be
beneficial to at least some people.
Duh.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 4/9/2014 1:03 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
maybe there are times during the day in depression or during the non-psychotic
part of schizophrenia that it might be useful if practised gingerly.
Meditation is defined as simply to
On 4/9/2014 10:25 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
Duh.
It looks like the answer is in - we can't even agree on the definition
of what meditation is. Go figure.
Let's rephrase my request:
We all think and have thoughts and everyone meditates on something every
day. But, how could a thought alter a
What's the point of you? What do you get out of this, I can think of a
trillion things I'd rather be doing than talking crap on an internet forum. I
just don't get why anyone would bother, and for decades.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 4/9/2014 10:25 AM,
On 4/9/2014 10:25 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
Duh.
It looks like you lost your train of thought.
So, what exactly, is TM?
According to MMY, TM is the passing of the cognitive attention from one
level of consciousness to another, sutler level of consciousness. This
passing back and forth between
On 4/9/2014 11:36 AM, salyavin808 wrote:
What's the point of you? What do you get out of this, I can think of a
trillion things I'd rather be doing than talking crap on an internet
forum. I just don't get why anyone would bother, and for decades.
Why don't you just STFU? If you don't want to
I was actually hoping you'd come out and say that you'd never got anything
from meditating and was asking a genuine question. Or maybe you just did that?
Anyways, that'd be funny if you'd been doing it wrong your whole life and
never gotten anything - explain a lot too. But I guess you
Why the hell do you bother, Salyavin?
I was actually hoping you'd come out and say that you'd never got anything
from meditating and was asking a genuine question. Or maybe you just did that?
Anyways, that'd be funny if you'd been doing it wrong your whole life and
never gotten
LOL, I don't know, I just get sucked in against all my better judgement. Maybe
deep down I think he'll listen but after all these years maybe not. As he
himself says, thoughts can't affect his mind...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Why the hell do you
salyavin, usually I find you pretty fair minded in your posts. But not so much
this time. What about the at least 2 other people who have been posting for
decades? They get a pass from you about that? Only Richard is guilty?!
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 12:42 PM, salyavin808
Assuming you aren't joking: It's not about length of time spent posting, it's
about the Chinese water torture of Tricky dicky's endless repetition. Yes, I
should ignore it but I can't help getting sucked in. Won't happen again.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
salyavin, I think Judy and turq also repeat themselves. True, not as much as
Richard does. But I think he has redeeming qualities too, as do they. I guess
it's just a matter of the fact that we all get triggered by different stuff.
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 12:59 PM, salyavin808
Not a chance.
The other day Share asked him a couple of perfectly reasonable questions about
something he'd written. He quoted the two questions, and underneath each of
them typed in a paragraph that had nothing whatsoever to do with what she'd
asked him. Hard to believe.
The only time I
(guffaw) And Share claims she doesn't pander...
salyavin, usually I find you pretty fair minded in your posts. But not so much
this time. What about the at least 2 other people who have been posting for
decades? They get a pass from you about that? Only Richard is guilty?!
On
Not as much as Richard does...
Understatement of the decade.
Richard has redeeming qualities...
Pander, pander, pander.
salyavin, I think Judy and turq also repeat themselves. True, not as much as
Richard does. But I think he has redeeming qualities too, as do they. I guess
it's
Judy, it sounds like you're saying that Richard has zero redeeming qualities.
Is that what you're saying?
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 1:40 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Not as much as Richard does...
Understatement of the decade.
Richard has redeeming
Judy, imo, you are so belligerent that not only does your intelligence get
overshadowed by it, but anything even a little positive, you label it
pandering.
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 1:38 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
(guffaw) And Share claims she doesn't
You don't have to defend him Share, he can do that if he likes. If he wants to
carry on and be ignored by 99% of the people here that's up to him. What he
gets out of it is beyond me.
Look at it as helping him realise that he needs to modify his approach if he
wants to be taken seriously.
Virtually none that I can see in his participation on FFL, no.
Judy, it sounds like you're saying that Richard has zero redeeming qualities.
Is that what you're saying?
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 1:40 PM, authfriend@... authfriend@... wrote:
Not as much as Richard does...
'Shooting the messenger' is a metaphoric phrase used to describe the act of
lashing out at the presumably blameless bearer of bad or unwelcome news.
In earlier times, messages were usually delivered in person by a human envoy.
Sometimes, as in war, for example, the messenger was sent from
I guess Xeno didn't see my posts about shooting the messenger. Barry isn't
criticized for bringing unwelcome news regarding TM, because he doesn't bring
any. He's criticized for his extreme and usually dishonest negative spin on
news we already know about, which is not what the phrase refers
salyavin, I'm not just defending Richard. I'm expressing my opinion, which is
the idea that we all have strengths and weaknesses. Certain weaknesses bother
me and others don't, and I think that's true of us all.
I'm not sure that Richard is so concerned about being taken seriously a lot of
the
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
I guess Xeno didn't see my posts about shooting the messenger. Barry isn't
criticized for bringing unwelcome news regarding TM, because he doesn't bring
any. He's criticized for his extreme and usually dishonest negative spin on
news
Judy, all I can say to that is for maybe the second or third time in almost 2
years, I really feel sorry for you.
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 2:08 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com
authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Virtually none that I can see in his participation on FFL, no.
Judy, it sounds like
I am sure you're absolutely sincere in saying that, Share. I've been feeling
sorry for you virtually since you joined us.
Judy, all I can say to that is for maybe the second or third time in almost 2
years, I really feel sorry for you.
On Wednesday, April 9, 2014 2:08 PM, authfriend@...
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sharelong60@... wrote :
I'm not sure that Richard is so concerned about being taken seriously a lot of
the time. Sometimes, but not as often as some other people who want to be taken
seriously ALL the time. Go figure!
That's excellent Share! Once
On 4/9/2014 2:05 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Virtually none that I can see in his participation on FFL, no.
So, it's all about Richard. Go figure.
On 4/9/2014 2:00 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
Look at it as helping him realise that he needs to modify his approach
if he wants to be taken seriously.
So, why would I want to be taking you seriously - you're just another
anonymous poster. But, your contributions should be able to stand on
their
On 4/9/2014 1:56 PM, Share Long wrote:
Judy, imo, you are so belligerent that not only does your intelligence
get overshadowed by it, but anything even a little positive, you label
it pandering.
They don't call her Judge Judy for nothing, Share. She makes the local
junkyard dog look like
On 4/9/2014 1:54 PM, Share Long wrote:
Judy, it sounds like you're saying that Richard has zero redeeming
qualities. Is that what you're saying?
Judy hates conservatives from Texas. It's not complicated.
On 4/9/2014 1:40 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Not as much as Richard does...
Understatement of the decade.
Richard has redeeming qualities...
Pander, pander, pander.
þ OLX 2.1 TD þ When there is no more dualism, Oneness is no longer such.
Speaking of it not taking much to make you happy...
Watching you pander to Share is almost as stupefying as watching her pander to
Richard or Barry.
I'm not sure that Richard is so concerned about being taken seriously a lot of
the time. Sometimes, but not as often as some other
Had nothing to do with your lie about Hillary, Richard. I've always found you
an excruciatingly boring troll.
They don't call her Judge Judy for nothing, Share. She makes the local
junkyard dog look like a kitten in comparison. Back in 2000 when I
started posting to Google Groups - I
Why thank you Judy. Yes, many of Share's posts do give me a measure of
happiness. The one below I thought was right on target.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend@... wrote :
Speaking of it not taking much to make you happy...
Watching you pander to Share is almost as
Hey Richard, I like the pictures you've posted of yourself. My favorite was
the one from when you worked as a reporter, (if I have that right)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 4/9/2014 2:00 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
Look at it as helping him realise that he
On 4/9/2014 1:21 PM, Share Long wrote:
True, not as much as Richard does.
Maybe they don't need as much spiritual help as I do, Share. They want
us to think they have everything all figured out, but they really suck
as spiritual teachers. This thread is a case in point - instead of
telling
On 4/9/2014 12:59 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
Assuming you aren't joking: It's not about length of time spent
posting, it's about the Chinese water torture of Tricky dicky's
endless repetition.
There's just pleasing you people sometimes. You sound like an
information junkie. Have you ever heard
On 4/9/2014 12:44 PM, Share Long wrote:
salyavin, usually I find you pretty fair minded in your posts. But not
so much this time. What about the at least 2 other people who have
been posting for decades? They get a pass from you about that? Only
Richard is guilty?!
Now this is really
On 4/9/2014 12:37 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Why the hell do you /bother/, Salyavin?
Some people just feel better when they have someone to talk to. You
should realize, Judy, that this is about as close to a spiritual
practice as some people get in an average day. The least you could do
On 4/9/2014 12:34 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
But I guess you actually do know that some words - or the way they are
used - hold wonders for the human mind, but instead you just want to
dance about it and ask obtuse questions like I'd want to go along
and argue the toss about nothing.
Don't be so
On 4/9/2014 1:36 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
The other day Share asked him a couple of perfectly reasonable
questions about something he'd written. He quoted the two questions,
and underneath each of them typed in a paragraph that had /nothing
whatsoever to do/ with what she'd asked him.
On 4/9/2014 2:00 PM, salyavin808 wrote:
If he wants to carry on and be ignored by 99% of the people here
that's up to him.
Thank God I'm ignored by 99% of the other informants posting here - that
would be about a total of five or six people. Thanks for not feeding it.
What he gets out of
On 4/9/2014 10:49 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Had nothing to do with your lie about Hillary, Richard. I've always
found you an excruciatingly boring troll.
You need to stop the lying, Judy. Calling someone a troll makes
assumptions about a writer's motives that are impossible to
On 4/9/2014 10:44 PM, authfri...@yahoo.com wrote:
Watching you pander to Share is almost as stupefying as watching her
pander to Richard or Barry.
Watching Judy get JELLOS of Steve and Share is priceless! Now, if I can
just strike up a conversation with Barry. LoL!
Sounds like an interesting book. Shame about the appalling title. I think the
tagline should read:
One Man's Escape from Insanity' is the story of Shuvender Sem, who, 10 years
later, we are now going to pretend that on March 1, 2004 became known as 'The
Maharishi Murderer' to sell more
I disagree, he seems to be lecturing on ways to cope with schizophrenia. From
his webpage:
Shubi’s first-hand experience with paranoid schizophrenia has given the
medical community fresh eyes on how to define and promote mental health. His
nationally renowned struggle with mental health
: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 8:39 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
Sounds like an interesting book. Shame about the appalling title. I think the
tagline should read:
One Man's Escape from Insanity
.
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 8:53 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
I disagree, he seems to be lecturing on ways to cope with schizophrenia. From
his webpage:
Shubi’s first-hand experience
: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
Sounds like an interesting book. Shame about the appalling title. I think the
tagline should read:
One Man's Escape from Insanity' is the story of Shuvender Sem, who, 10 years
later, we are now going to pretend that on March 1, 2004 became known
: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
Sounds like an interesting book. Shame about the appalling title. I think the
tagline should read:
One Man's Escape from Insanity' is the story of Shuvender Sem, who, 10 years
later, we are now going to pretend that on March 1, 2004 became known
and stay aren't going to be such a big draw.
But they won't backfire either...
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 8:39 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
Sounds like an interesting book. Shame
With a constructed title like that the TMO ought to sue Michael Jackson (!)
from A to Z and back again. But probably they realize his mental problems are
so profound that they won't bother. The USA might have different laws. In
Europe seriously disturbed persons, or persons with an IQ below 50
From: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 11:19 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
With a constructed title like that the TMO ought to sue Michael Jackson (!)
from A to Z and back again.
I repeat my
14,827 were murdered in the USA last year, that's 4,7 pr 100.000 people. The
comparable rate is 0.4 in Japan, 0.8 in Germany, 1.0 in Australia 1.1 in France
and 1.2 in Britain.
That's more worrying than one murder in Fairfield or what one retarded poster
to an obscure blog is capable of doing
by an administrator happy to let it remain un-moderated,
is capable of doing in RL.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 11:19 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi
.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 11:19 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
With a constructed title like that the TMO ought to sue Michael
I think you are right about that - I thought the UK press had dubbed him the
Maharishi Murderer but I may be incorrect
On Tue, 4/8/14, feste37 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
To: FairfieldLife
unfortunate that the parents were
behaving so badly as to sue MIU and they were accruing some really bad karma.
On Tue, 4/8/14, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
To: FairfieldLife
Good one Sal!
On Tue, 4/8/14, salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, April 8, 2014, 10:55 AM
how could they sue me? I didn't make the title up.
On Tue, 4/8/14, nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, April 8, 2014, 9:19 AM
On 4/7/2014 8:41 PM, Michael Jackson wrote:
I also have to point out that he is not the only one to be doing TM
regularly and commit a crime - fraud, sex crimes, murder and attempted
murder. And I don't think it can all be laid at the door of they had
an underlying mental imbalance before
On 4/8/2014 7:17 AM, Michael Jackson wrote:
I think you are right about that
You got to work really early today!
On 4/8/2014 2:04 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
Many of the people on campus (and the TBs here) are still busy
pretending it never happened in their own minds.
This is funny - Barry probably never set foot on the MUM campus, or even
the campus in Vlodrop, NE where Barry lived for years. Go figure.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, punditster@... wrote :
On 4/8/2014 2:04 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
Many of the people on campus (and the TBs here) are still busy pretending it
never happened in their own minds.
This is funny - Barry probably never set foot on the MUM campus, or even
On 4/8/2014 2:17 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
While your approach to this is rational, Salyavin, I think you have to
remember that you're not dealing with rational people.
We are not dealing with rational people - if they were rational, they
wouldn't murder students at school.
They're ANGRY at
On 4/8/2014 4:35 AM, TurquoiseBee wrote:
WTF went wrong with the supposed ME that a student 'doing program' as
he was told to do in the exact dead center of all of this powerful Woo
Woo went off and killed someone?
Now this is not funny - Barry's guru was into the powerful Woo Woo, up
to,
Where, exactly, Barry, does Nabby make excuses for Shuvender Sem and for the
TMO? I couldn't find that part of his post. Could you quote it for us, please?
Unless, of course, it was just your fantasy.
After all, the notion that Nabby would be upset that a new round of publicity
is going to
staff members that you must
not allow any bad news to leak out. You were required to keep up this image of
a perfect campus at all costs.
On Mon, 4/7/14, feste37 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
of
a perfect campus at all costs.
On Mon, 4/7/14, feste37 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
From: authfri...@yahoo.com authfri...@yahoo.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 4:28 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
. . .
He [ Barry, the messenger Judy wants desperately to shoot any way she can ]
seems to have failed to notice
, nablusoss1008 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Tuesday, April 8, 2014, 9:19 AM
Sem is a murderer de facto. He's just not a murderer de jure, i.e., not legally
guilty of murder. So of course there's no contradiction there.
I'm not sure how Feste could catch, without having read the book, that Sem
is boasting about anything other than, perhaps, his apparent recovery from
.
On Mon, 4/7/14, feste37 no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Monday, April 7, 2014, 10:47 PM
I find this utterly appalling and repellant. This
man should not make money from
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
I don't get that he was boasting about it. But he did murder the guy and not
guilty by way of insanity is obviously
You've never quite understood the phrase shoot the messenger. It assumes that
the messenger himself is not responsible for the message and thus is being shot
unfairly. Obviously that isn't the case with you; you bring knowingly false
messages of your own devising all the time, and you are
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb@... wrote :
From: salyavin808 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 8, 2014 4:41 PM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
I don't get that he was boasting about
of
a perfect campus at all costs.
On Mon, 4/7/14, feste37 no_re...@yahoogroups.com
mailto:no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote:
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Maharishi Murderer
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
