--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
I can't believe I have Shemp defending me against Judy! But
I have, so keep up the good work, Shemp! I agree with many
of your points. You are right
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't help
but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes himself. I
always assume he's just joking around when he posts bullshit just to
get a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
I'm visualizing huge marauding hordes of homosexuals going around,
breaking into homes, redecorating them, and forcing fabulous
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral
sex.
Would
Huh. One Scientific American article showed conclusively that the
most popular potrait of Shaekspear was a retouched version of the
most popular portrait of Queen Elisabeth, and suggested that SHE was
the author of a good many plays.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm visualizing huge marauding hordes of homosexuals going around,
breaking into homes, redecorating them, and forcing fabulous
hairstyles upon the drab, heterosexual occupants.
Remembering the interior photos here
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
I can't help but think you take Barry far more seriously
than he takes himself. I always assume he's just joking
around when he posts bullshit just to get
On Feb 27, 2006, at 8:39 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Alex Stanley" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm visualizing huge marauding hordes of homosexuals going around, breaking into homes, redecorating them, and forcing fabulous hairstyles upon the drab, heterosexual
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't
help but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Judy, above you said:
Also, just for the record, pedophilia is considered a sexual
disorder, whereas homosexuality is not, at least
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
I can't help but think you take Barry far more seriously
than he takes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
I can't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
I can't help but think you take Barry far more seriously
than he takes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wouldn't describe the discussion as yelling, but it
was a little bit heated at times, and there were labels
being thrown around.
Labels as weapons...like kids throwing insults
on the order of Poopie pants at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
I wouldn't describe the discussion as yelling, but it
was a little bit heated at times, and there were labels
being thrown around.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can't speak for Judy, but I think all Judy is saying is that there
is nothing disordered about being sexually attracted to people who
have reached sexual maturity. However, there is a major difference
between
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
I can't speak for Judy, but I think all Judy is saying is that there
is nothing disordered about being sexually attracted to people who
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
I can't speak for Judy, but I think all Judy is saying is that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But,
I can't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
Judy, above you said:
Also, just for the
Very good, Judy, but actually, Feste is in Twelfth Night, not King Lear. But
you
are right about the wisdom part. Feste is a very non-attached character in that
play; he knows everything that is going on but belongs nowhere and doesn't
care to. He also has the last word in the play -- another
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:10 PM, authfriend wrote:
Right: Vaj, isn't your scholarship as thin as a
tart's negligee?
We had the answer to that without your assistance,
although you thoughtfully provide additional
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 9:17 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
On Feb 25, 2006, at 6:33 PM, authfriend wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Very good, Judy, but actually, Feste is in Twelfth Night, not King
Lear.
You are absolutely correct. So much for *my* scholarship!
But you
are right about the wisdom part. Feste is a very non-attached
character in
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Shakespeare's Fools are extraordinary. I've
often wondered whether Shakespeare was enlightened,
and his Fools seem to me to suggest that he was.
Are you aware of some of the speculations about Shakespeare i.e. how
Shakespeare's plays were in fact written by the Earl of Oxford. They were
certainly not written by the illiterate Shaksper from Stratford, who could
barely
sign his own name and appears to have been interested only in the
acquisition of wealth, social status and property.
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
Shakespeare's Fools are extraordinary. I've
often wondered whether Shakespeare was enlightened,
and his Fools seem to me to suggest that
Why would the Earl of Oxford not have wanted to take credit for the plays?
Sal
On Feb 26, 2006, at 9:31 AM, feste37 wrote:
Shakespeare's plays were in fact written by the Earl of Oxford. They were
certainly not written by the illiterate Shaksper from Stratford, who could barely
sign his
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
It just wasn't the thing for a nobleman to write plays for the public theaters,
which were considered rather disreputable places. Writing plays was
something lower-class people did. It was closer to a trade than an honorable
profession, hence the word playwright, as in shipwright and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Do you have a Web reference for St. Germaine? I don't
know nuttin' about him, or about those speculations.
snip
Whoever he was, he was one hell of an incarnation. I'm
inclined to think of him as the most significant
On Feb 26, 2006, at 1:04 PM, lurkernomore20002000 wrote:The "buzz" about St. Germaine is about as wild as you are likely to find. It makes for a great story whether it's true or not. I am not an expert by a long shot, but one version has St. Germain being the soul who discovered America as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Do you have a Web reference for St. Germaine? I don't
know nuttin' about him, or about those speculations.
snip
Whoever he was, he
OK, even if that were the case, the profession became respectable and has been so for quite a while since. Wouldn't the Earl's descendants have wanted to set the record straight? Wouldn't they want their own ancestor to be known as the greatest playwright in history? And why would the Earl have
Judy writes:
I have to say, though, I'm not as interested in
Shakespeare's identity, incarnational or historical, as
I am in the physical entity who put the words on paper,
if you see the distinction I'm making.
Whoever he was, he was one hell of an incarnation. I'm
inclined to think of him as
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Patrick Gillam [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- sparaig wrote:
Why are
so many women into giving oral sex?
You mean unreciprocated oral sex? As opposed
to the serial giving and receiving of pleasure?
Yep.
Yahoo!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Those who are so keen to prove their liberal credentials by
endorsing the
practice of buggery might care to consult The Secret Life of Oscar
Wilde
(2005), by Neil McKenna, which provides many details of the
disgusting
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Those who are so keen to prove their liberal credentials
I have no interest in liberal credentials.
by endorsing the
practice of buggery might
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sorry, but I don't find the acts disgusting. I
find homophobia such as yours disgusting.
I don't get off on looking at such acts. ANd any physical response is
tainted with a certain level of distaste so I don't
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/24/06 1:42:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
jstein@ writes:
I was shocked tofind that feste is a creationist -- or at least
an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On Feb 24, 2006, at 5:54 PM, feste37 wrote:
But it doesn't mean I have to go
along with the homosexual agenda
What is that, Feste? I mean that sincerely. I have heard about the
homosexual agenda for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/24/06 5:19:15 P.M. Central Standard Time,
j_alexander_stanley@ writes:
Or maybe just a little more in tune with nature than
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
Were I a fundamentalist christian, I might call it counter to
nature. Instead, I just call it something I'm not into for various
reasons. However, I don't justify my personal distaste by condemning
other peoplefor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
Were I a fundamentalist christian, I might call it counter to
nature. Instead, I just call it something I'm not into for
various
reasons.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
snip
2) Anal sex, Do you a man and woman haveing anal anal sex
I'm having a little trouble visualizing this one...
double-ended dildo?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Wasn't St. Germaine, *as* St. Germaine, active during
the French Revolution? Or was that a different St.
Germaine?
same dude. In some ways he's just like Waldo. He keeps popping up in
interesting places.
lurk
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
Sorry, but I don't find the acts disgusting. I
find homophobia such as yours disgusting.
I don't get off on looking at such acts. ANd any physical
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
snip
Were I a fundamentalist christian, I might call it counter to
nature.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@
wrote:
snip
Were
Shaksper was an actor. He was quite a convenient front man for Oxford. I
cannot answer all your questions because it is some years since I researched
this and I have forgotten many of the details. But the best book on the subject
was published only last August. It's called Shakespeare by Any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 2/24/06 1:42:45 P.M. Central Standard Time,
jstein@ writes:
Even though many of the plays were written after Oxford died? OK.
I imagine in about 3 or 400 years we'll be hearing pretty much the same thing about Lennon and MacCartney: Those guys could *never* have produced all that music. No way! They were from ordinary families, not the elite! They
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Even though many of the plays were written after Oxford died? OK.
I imagine in about 3 or 400 years we'll be hearing pretty much the same
thing about Lennon and MacCartney: Those guys could *never* have
produced
The official dates of composition of the plays involves large amounts of
guesswork. Many of them cannot be dated with any certainty at all. Oxford
died some years before Shaksper, but the so-called later plays can without
much difficulty be placed earlier than they appear in the official
On Feb 26, 2006, at 6:34 PM, feste37 wrote:
I'm unconvinced by your Beatles analogy, but it doesn't interest me one way
or another what you choose to believe.
I was just attempting to instill a little humor in the discussion, Feste--a hopeless task, I should have known.
You asked me a
I made the mistake of thinking that your inquiry was a serious one, and I took
some time to deal sincerely with you in a spirit of intellectual inquiry.
Obviously, I was wasting my time. You do not have a clue what you are
talking about and you appear to have no interest in learning.
That's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
Even though many of the plays were written after Oxford died?
OK.
I imagine in about 3 or 400 years we'll be hearing pretty much
the same
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk
shempmcgurk@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
Argue THAT, suckas... :-) :-) :-)
Interesting in a discussion of homosexual acts, you call
people suckas. Anything latent you want to discuss
Are you saying anal sex has become the norm now!!! I would like to
know where you got that info from, I hoped it was still a minority
thing.
By the way did you know the anal sex craze started in the 70's when
censors in the US banned vaginal intercourse from movies, but there's
always a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis reavismarek@
wrote:
Not so sure about the other groups (below) but I think I'd like a
little more information on the women-under-thirty agenda.
I am not sure
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
Bottom line for me in all of this is that I think
some people just like to LABEL others. Isn't that
pretty much what this discussion has been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
I can't believe I have Shemp defending me against Judy! But
I have, so keep up the good work, Shemp! I agree with many
of your points. You are right
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
And just to stir the waters a bit before I leave
( insert evil laugh here ), has no one but me
noticed the relationship of the 'homophobe' thread
to the Amma/muslim/cartoon thread?
Essentially, feste *wrote a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
I can't believe I have Shemp defending me against Judy! But
I have, so keep up the good work, Shemp! I agree with many
of your points. You are right
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis reavismarek@
wrote:
Not so sure about the other groups (below) but I think I'd like a
little
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't help
but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes himself. I
always assume he's just joking around when he posts bullshit just to
get a rise out of people.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
Would you look more favorably on homosexuals if
they engaged only in oral sex and never in anal
sex?
And I keep forgetting to ask: In your opinion, do
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
Does that mean you believe cocksucking is part of the mouth's design
specifications?
Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm visualizing huge marauding hordes of homosexuals going around,
breaking into homes, redecorating them, and forcing fabulous
hairstyles upon the drab, heterosexual occupants.
Thats been happening for sometime now:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't
help but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes
himself. I always assume he's just joking around when he posts
bullshit just to get a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
But its one of those disgusting acts that disgusting fags do so I
figured you were against that too. Like anal sex. You are against that
because its one of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't
help but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes
himself. I always assume he's just joking around when he posts
bullshit just to get
You like making things up, don't you? And the word fag that you employ
twice is your word, not mine. I did not and do not use it. I also make a
distinction between the person and the things that a person does that you
have missed.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl [EMAIL
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
Judy, your analysis is, of course, dead on accurate. But, I can't
help but think you take Barry far more seriously than he takes
It means precisely what it says. Can't you read?
-- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Just for the record, I have made no comment at all about oral sex.
Does that mean you believe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You like making things up, don't you? And the word fag that you
employ
twice is your word, not mine. I did not and do not use it. I also
make a
distinction between the person and the things that a person does
that you
On Feb 25, 2006, at 10:52 AM, foufou_fl wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "feste37" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You like making things up, don't you? And the word "fag" that you employ twice is your word, not mine. I did not and do not use it. I also make a distinction between the
That's another one that was sure to come soon, the Jesus may have been
gay thing. When so little is known for sure about a historical figure, you can
make him into anything you want. No one can prove you right or wrong, so
there's really no point to it, is there?
--- In
It would make some gays more accepted and less marginalized. That's a good thing, no?Have you read the edited-out parts of Mark?On Feb 25, 2006, at 11:41 AM, feste37 wrote:That's another one that was sure to come soon, the "Jesus may have been gay" thing. When so little is known for sure
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It would make some gays more accepted and less marginalized. That's a
good thing, no?
Not if you're just making it up, no. People who say Jesus may have been a
homosexual are simply trying to spin non-existent historical
In a message dated 2/25/06 1:11:30 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Seems to
me that a couple of people were boredbecause there weren't any arguments
going on, andso the moment an excuse for one appeared, theyleaped on
it, spewed out a label or two, andthen
On Feb 25, 2006, at 12:21 PM, feste37 wrote:--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It would make some gays more accepted and less marginalized. That's a good thing, no? Not if you're just making it up, no. People who say Jesus may have been a homosexual are
As you well know, all these documents were written many years after the life
of Jesus, in some cases up to two centuries later (if I remember rightly). They
express different ideological agendas. Whatever lost book you are referring
to is no more of a guide to the historical Jesus than the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's another one that was sure to come soon, the Jesus
may have been gay thing. When so little is known for sure
about a historical figure, you can make him into anything
you want.
In this case, there's so little
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you saying anal sex has become the norm now!!! I would like to
know where you got that info from, I hoped it was still a minority
thing.
By the way did you know the anal sex craze started in the 70's
when
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, foufou_fl no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Marek Reavis
reavismarek@
wrote:
Not so sure about the other groups (below) but I think I'd
like a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It means precisely what it says. Can't you read?
I can read. I was just curious what sentiment or thinking was behind
the lack of commentary. It's not a problem if you don't want to elaborate.
-- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
I can't believe I have Shemp defending me against Judy! But
I have, so keep up
1 - 100 of 215 matches
Mail list logo
