http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_%28illusion%29
By Sri Sankaracharya
The Supreme Self (or Ultimate Reality) who is Pure Consciousness
perceived Himself by Selfhood (i.e. Existence with I-
Consciousness). He became endowed with the name I. From that arose
the basis of difference.
He exists
I guess Nokia is not very popular in the US, but
perhaps some of you could comment on the
usefulness/uselessness of this application, or whatever:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tweT57KCgc8
www.gypsii.com
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Let those who feel they are qualified to fix it
do so. But if you do, and the TM movement starts to
display less silliness, you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your take on it is different than mine. I observe, hopefully
without generalizing too much, that new-ager, relative to
the general population, have tendencies to:
1) be more gullible and trusting
2) have let go
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped thinking
that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, meaning, or
effect in the world ...at all...
...then, you the might be smart enough to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, do.rflex do.rflex@ wrote:
Whatever Happened to 'We the People'?
Lurk:
We became wee the people. And our handlers are pushing Wii for
the people to keep us distracted.
The definitive test of whether or not you have
a life is here. Something to do on a lazy Sunday.
http://tinyurl.com/2dupjw
http://www.rollingstone.com/news/story/17177243/the_almost_8212_impossible_rock_
_roll_quiz
No bragging here. My mind is *full* of rock trivia,
but it's clearly from
Anyone know, why are saaMkhya-suutra_s thought to be
written as late as 14th or 15th century A.D?
Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon:
1 sAMkhyasUtra n. N. of six books of aphorisms of the SñSa1m2khya
philosophy (ascribed to Kapila , but prob. written in the 14th or 15th
century A.D.) [1199,2]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped
thinking
that your silly whining comments on FFl have any value, meaning,
or
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
why would anyone listen to
people
who are saying they were s stupid in the past but now are
correct, and we should listen to you?
Ain't gonna happen people. Hate to bust your bubble folks,
but
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Actually Mainstream, if you were not so stupid, and stopped
I just heard Paul Davies, the author of the op-ed
piece, interviewed on NPR the other day. He's a
philosopher-scientist with some very subtle reasoning
skills. I'm planning to pick-up his book: The Cosmic
Jackpot: (subtitle here).
--- hugheshugo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In
Well, I certainly hope this happens. I wish Dr.
Alvarez the best. But I have a sneaking suspicion that
this will be the last that we ever hear about this.
MMY has trained his Rajas to be like him: they value
the idea much more than the reality.
--- michael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Latin
http://tinyurl.com/2dlrgn
This is so entertaining on so many levels.
Edg
While walking down the street one day a US senator is tragically hit
by a truck and dies.
His soul arrives in heaven and is met by St. Peter at the entrance.
Welcome to heaven, says St. Peter. Before you settle in, it seems
there is a problem. We seldom see a high official around these parts,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I just heard Paul Davies, the author of the op-ed
piece, interviewed on NPR the other day. He's a
philosopher-scientist with some very subtle reasoning
skills. I'm planning to pick-up his book: The Cosmic
Jackpot:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
no_reply@
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
Your take on it is different than mine. I observe, hopefully
without generalizing too much, that new-ager, relative to
the general population,
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One reader review quotes the last paragraph of the
book:
Perhaps we have reached a fundamental
impasse dictated
by the limitations of the [waking state]human
intellect.
There we go!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, hugheshugo
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
From an op-ed by Paul Davies in the NY Times:
The idea that the laws [of physics] exist reasonlessly is deeply
anti-rational.
What physicists
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just heard Paul Davies, the author of the op-ed
piece, interviewed on NPR the other day. He's a
philosopher-scientist with some very subtle reasoning
skills. I'm planning to pick-up his book: The Cosmic
Jackpot: (subtitle
After reading the op-ed piece I must admit that his
interview on NPR was more impressive than this piece.
Either I'm missing his point or his point is rather
banal. He seems to need to take a good philosophy of
science course. To me he appears to be reifying the
laws of physics. That is he's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Good post which I don't really have time to reply properly
to, but I would say that your point that new-agers are gullible
and trusting and have let go
Erik wrote:
SaaMkhya-suutras: any takers?
Anyone know, why are saaMkhya-suutra_s thought to be
written as late as 14th or 15th century A.D?
Cologne Digital Sanskrit Lexicon:
1 sAMkhyasUtra n. N. of six books of aphorisms of
the SñSa1m2khya philosophy (ascribed to Kapila , but
prob.
That's all that happens, we try to understand and explain by using
reason, if a law fits for a while it is called a scientific
truth, meaning that it's the most likely explanation for the
observable facts, if new facts comes to light the laws change.
Nothing anti-reason about it. The
do.rflex wrote:
Clapping?
So, you read all the stuff from Maharishi, bought yourself
some Hush Puppies and a cheap suit in order to get that
initiator look, during your early days in the TMO when
you were working for the Marshy, selling gibberish nonsense
syllables to poor students; but WE
Rory Goff writes snipped:
But to know itself as Self is not like any other knowledge, which
is indeed dualistic and based on a comparison, on an either-or
discrimination.
That's why this Self-knowledge is so mind-blowing -- literally. It is
so ordinary and so special, so still and so
TomT:
From Jean Klein Transmission of the Flame page 65 snip
Understanding, being the understanding, is enlightenment
YES -- Understanding is probably a better word than Knowledge as
Now we both figuratively and literally Under-stand ourSelf, and it is
truly and simply a whole-body BEing.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
After reading the op-ed piece I must admit that his
interview on NPR was more impressive than this piece.
Either I'm missing his point or his point is rather
banal. He seems to need to take a good philosophy of
science
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
That's all that happens, we try to understand and explain by using
reason, if a law fits for a while it is called a scientific truth,
meaning that it's the most likely explanation for the observable
facts, if new facts comes to light the laws change. Nothing anti-
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
As I understand his point, he's asking why there should
be higher-order explanations of ontological facts in
the first place. (That the explanations evolve as we
learn more is beside the point.)
Or to put it another
We take the fact that the universe is apparently orderly
as a given; but how is that different from taking the
existence of God as a given?
But it wasn't a given in science. It is just something we are
uncovering about the world by studying it using the scientific method.
We didn't make it up
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I guess Nokia is not very popular in the US, but
perhaps some of you could comment on the
usefulness/uselessness of this application, or whatever:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tweT57KCgc8
www.gypsii.com
I
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's all that happens, we try to understand and explain by
using
reason, if a law fits for a while it is called a scientific
truth, meaning that it's the most likely explanation for the
observable
I have been close to a member of one of these organizations. My
brother-in-law. Also, had I done what I was supposed to do at age 18, I would
have married into that whole world, and I knew very well what that world was
about and what my role in it would be. I mentioned in another post that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We take the fact that the universe is apparently orderly
as a given; but how is that different from taking the
existence of God as a given?
But it wasn't a given in science. It is just something we are
My original statements were
1) I see fascist elements in the TMO. That's not a matter of discussion. I
see what I see. Prolly cause I've got Hitler on the brain.
2) I think the New Age may play into the hands of those leading us to fascism
because of the emphasis on personal development which
You make some excellent points which I will think about.
new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
mailander111@ wrote:
I
What's the difference, other than that the religionists
label the question mark God and the scientists don't
label it? It's still the same unanswered question.
This is the most interesting part of it for me, facing the mystery. I
know some Christian monks who would be comfortable with your
Yes, I agree. Supportive. I never said causal and wouldn't. Causes are
impossible to speak of in the area of intellectual history.
new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In
FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This idea that
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My original statements were
1) I see fascist elements in the TMO. That's not a matter of
discussion. I see what I see. Prolly cause I've got Hitler on the
brain.
At least as much in the way of fascist
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I wrote a paper on this very subject while working on my Master's at
Harvard Divinity School... That was in 1980 or so, right after
constant immersion in the omnipresent gold light/angels/deities/blah-
blah-blah of
It is for the sake of the mystery that Meister Eckhart said, I pray to God
that he may quit me of God.
curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the difference, other than that the religionists
label the question mark God and the scientists don't
label
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the difference, other than that the religionists
label the question mark God and the scientists don't
label it? It's still the same unanswered question.
This is the most interesting part of it for me,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It is for the sake of the mystery that Meister Eckhart said, I pray
to God that he may quit me of God.
More like, If you meet the Buddha on the road,
kill him.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
Your take on it is different than mine. I observe, hopefully
without
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One reader review quotes the last paragraph of the
book:
Perhaps we have reached a fundamental
impasse dictated
by the limitations of the [waking state]human
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings
no_reply@
Again, what's the difference between the religionist's
That's just how God wants it and the scientist's
That's just the way it is?
A pick up truck of detailed pre-suppositions including, but not
limited to: We know some of the qualities of God including what he
wants, we know that these qualities
Uhu, unlikely.
( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health,
Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one ounce
of fear within this physique. How about you? )
So how's your ground game? Seen any UFCs in the last decade?
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@ wrote:
Good post which I don't really have time to reply properly
to, but I would say
Let's back up just a bit and go back to Davies's article.
He makes his point clear as crystal at the very end:
It seems to me there is no hope of ever explaining why the physical
universe is as it is so long as we are fixated on immutable laws or
meta-laws that exist reasonlessly or are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_%28illusion%29
By Sri Sankaracharya
Though the emission of ejaculate onto sleeping garments or
bedclothes is yielded by the natural experience of copulation in a
wet dream,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Again, what's the difference between the religionist's
That's just how God wants it and the scientist's
That's just the way it is?
A pick up truck of detailed pre-suppositions including, but not
limited to: We
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let's back up just a bit and go back to Davies's article.
Excellent, because this is where the most interesting point lies, his
formulation of the third choice. I give his site a read to try to
understand what he is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 feste37@
wrote:
Good
Now see I have to show my complete and total ignorance here because I
really do not know what the heck Shankara is (I will look it up). I
do hope, as the years go by, that TM takes care of its advanced
students curriculum needs and if, just for example, there is a
recurrence of headaches or
Proponents of the term [Stalinism] argue that it includes an extensive
use of propaganda to establish a personality cult around an absolute
dictator, as well as extensive use of the secret police to maintain
social submission and silence political dissent.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stalinism
Ok, I found some Shankara information on the web. Very Interesting.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_reply@
wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maya_%28illusion%29
By Sri
MMY uses a parallel management and organization change method, similar
to Mao (and perhaps some western businesses).
Essentially, recreate the organization periodically. Destry the old
order, create new structures. In time, destroy them and recreate ...
SRM == SIMS == Regional Coordinators ==
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Uhu, unlikely.
( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health,
Scottish with a tinge of English just for measure, and not one ounce
of fear within this physique. How about you? )
So how's
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Uhu, unlikely.
( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health,
Scottish with a tinge of English just for
I don't understand what he means by an external agency. Where is there an
agency external to the universe?
I'd bet more than a buck that the answer involves consciousness.
curtisdeltablues [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ---
In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Uhu, unlikely.
( 3 years of intense karate training, full blooded perfect health,
Scottish with a tinge of English just for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Uhu, unlikely.
( 3 years of intense karate training,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
I wrote a paper on this very subject while working on my
Master's at
Harvard Divinity School... That was in 1980 or so, right after
constant
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
I wrote a paper on this very subject while working on my
Master's at
Harvard Divinity School... That was in 1980 or so, right after
constant
Invincible America:
Call to action; July 2006
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/107519
Except, ejected August 2006
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/104974
Except rejected, August 2006
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/108879
Rejected:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
I wrote a paper on this very subject while working on my
Master's at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Shotokan, not yer sloppy bar-room brawlers.
Shotakan is a venerable ancient art. Certainly better than barroom
brawlers. However it
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, nicely put (if I do say so mySelf *lol*); the omnipresent gold-
light/angels/deities/etc. would be the subjective (and by that I
mean real) equivalent of attaining lightspeed and essential
identity with the laws of
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't understand what he means by an external agency. Where is
there an agency external to the universe?
(a) God, or (b) laws of nature. Probably would be
clearer if you read the article we're talking
about,
Having studied Shotokan for a number of years
before investigating other styles, I have to
agree with Curtis about its applicability in
the real world. It's similar to what someone
said about Maharishi and the Rajas earlier
today -- the idea of being able to fight is
a great deal more
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having studied Shotokan for a number of years
before investigating other styles, I have to
agree with Curtis about its applicability in
the real world. It's similar to what someone
said about Maharishi and
That's the problem then. The universe either includes all, or it ain't the
universe. G. Spencer Brown puts it well in his Laws of Form:
It seems hard to find an acceptable answer to the question of how or
why the world conceives a desire, and discovers an ability, to see
itself, and appears
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Angela Mailander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That's the problem then. The universe either includes all, or it
ain't the universe.
Just read the article, eh?
Oh, goodie. Story time. Tell us the one again about the infinitely
radiant Pride. Ot the ones where particlees collide in this big
chamber and go boom boom! Or one about dragons. I love the ones
about dragons!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What an
On Nov 25, 2007, at 2:14 PM, new.morning wrote:
MMY uses a parallel management and organization change method, similar
to Mao (and perhaps some western businesses).
(snip)
Mao's famous saying, could also easily be Mahesh's:
A lie repeated a hundred times becomes the truth.
-Chairman Mao
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having studied Shotokan for a number of years
before investigating other styles, I have to
agree with Curtis about its applicability in
the real world. It's similar to what someone
said about Maharishi and
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's been a kind of revelation, realizing that
random violence is *not* an ever-present possi-
bility. I walk where I want, when I want, in all
types of neighborhoods and at all hours of the
night and day, and have
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Uhu, unlikely.
( 3 years of intense karate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Uhu, unlikely.
( 3 years of intense karate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
Shotokan, not yer sloppy bar-room brawlers.
Shotakan
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
in daily life one's mind and body be trained and
developed in a spirit of humility,
Yup. Describes you perfectly.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
in daily life one's mind and body be trained and
developed in a spirit of humility,
Yup. Describes you perfectly.
No , I failed the test,
24 as done with 1994 technology
http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1788161
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
curtisdeltablues@ wrote:
Uhu, unlikely.
( 3 years of intense karate
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
snip
THIS IS SHOTOKAN (that I learned, and these are just people trying to
qualify for black belt or 2nd dan)
http://youtube.com/watch?v=ZlAFJHEu8go
Boy, to the utterly untrained eye, that's pretty
darned
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rory Goff rorygoff@
wrote:
Yes, nicely put (if I do say so mySelf *lol*); the omnipresent
gold-
light/angels/deities/etc. would be the subjective (and by that I
mean real)
... but if you think those videos that Curtis posted are Shotokan,
then you know nothing of Shotokan as you claimed.
Those videos Curt posted are an insult to Shotokan.
THIS IS SHOTOKAN (that I learned, and these are just people trying to
qualify for black belt or 2nd dan)
In a message dated 11/25/2007 6:51:08 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnDrbagYm24
Thanks, that was the most beautiful message I have received in weeks so full
of love a fine reflection of U as well. THANKS
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I thought you were a pro science guy. You know peer reviewed
studies?
The review of martial arts has been settled in the octagon ring.
The
videos I showed were challenge matches by brave Shotokan fighters
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Janet Luise [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rnDrbagYm24
Thanks, Janet Luise, for the joy. Hope you and Tom are well. How's Tom's bro,
Bill ?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning no_reply@ wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
Erik wrote:
SaaMkhya-suutras: any takers?
Anyone know, why are saaMkhya-suutras thought to be written as late
as 14th or 15th century A.D?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Willytex:
Sage Patanjali, who compiled the 'Yoga
I am very familiar with full contact tournaments. They have many more
rules than a mixed martial arts matches. It is a great sport. But we
started the discussion about actual fighting without rules about
takedowns. One punch one kill is a fantasy perpetuated by people who
stay our of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Tell that to Arjunalol !3 million people drawn up on the
battlefield ready for COMPLETE anihilation, and he is in the middle
of it prayin' to jesus for help.
If 3 million warriors had come bent on
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, curtisdeltablues
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am very familiar with full contact tournaments. They have many
more
rules than a mixed martial arts matches. It is a great sport. But
we
started the discussion about actual fighting without rules about
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh, goodie. Story time. Tell us the one again about the infinitely
radiant Pride. Ot the ones where particlees collide in this big
chamber and go boom boom! Or one about dragons. I love the ones
about dragons!
It
1 - 100 of 118 matches
Mail list logo
