[FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: Blacks are better at basketball; Chinese are better at math and engineering; Italians are better cooks. What other groups can you think of in this manner? The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. My own skills stand as an anecdotal support to these studies, although my staying time is WAY longer than any that were found in the studies :-) OffWorld (Scottish born and bred) For once Off is telling the truth. There WAS such a study, it DID appear in peer-reviewed journals, and the Scots DID have longer lovemaking times than Americans or men from other countries. Some feel that the study was biased, however, and that the Scots would not have scored as high if their lovemaking partners in the study had been women. The non-Scots found it more challenging to keep their...uh...interest up for a sheep.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
And I believe it has been documented among your partners that they score much lower on math aptitude having come to believe that what they have been told is 6, in actually 2 And the lady can forget about ever getting cab fair home. ...but mountain doesn't move! --- On Mon, 8/25/08, lurkernomore20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: lurkernomore20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 12:36 AM And I believe it has been documented among your partners that they score much lower on math aptitude having come to believe that what they have been told is 6, in actually 2 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe so Peter, but only the Scots are clearly documented in peer-reviewed journals to be rated as the best lovers in the world. The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. My own skills stand as an anecdotal support to these studies, although my staying time is WAY longer than any that were found in the studies :-) OffWorld (Scottish born and bred) PS. Why are you the only person in the world that still posts at the top of a thread? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote: Here's the complete and total FACT that will put to rest this ridiculous discussion regarding superiority/inferiority off different ethnic groups. Do you know statistics? If not, sorry, you may not understand this. There are different means (averages) for normally distributed traits in different ethnic populations. For example European-Americans as a group have an average IQ 10 to 15 points higher than the average group IQ for African-Americans, 5 to 7 points higher than Hispanic-Americans and 3 to 6 points lower than Asian Americans. If you control for income the European-American, Hispanic-American and African-American difference disappears, but the Asian still remains. But the important point here is that within group differences are much, much larger than between group differences. WHAT THIS MEANS IS THAT YOU CAN HAVE A EUROPEAN AMERICAN THAT CAN JUMP AND AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN WHO GETS A FULL ACADEMIC SCHOLARSHIP TO MIT. Again within group differences are much, much larger than between group differences. --- On Sun, 8/24/08, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, August 24, 2008, 10:27 PM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: Hey Off, Don't toot your horn so loudly. Our hearing is fairly normal, thanks What's your problem? OffWorld --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: Blacks are better at basketball; Chinese are better at math and engineering; Italians are better cooks. What other groups can you think of in this manner? The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. My own skills stand as an anecdotal support to these studies, although my staying time is WAY longer than any that were found in the studies :-) OffWorld (Scottish born and bred)
[FairfieldLife] Everything that's wrong with American politics, in one photo
http://tinyurl.com/6nbfnx All that's missing is Bob Barker. It makes Leni Riefenstahl's iconic images of Hitler's Germany look classy.
[FairfieldLife] Re: 'More on AUM'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So, 'OM' is a recent invention - it's not even an esoteric mantra, except by courtesy. 'OM or 'AUM' isn't a bija mantra used in genuine tantric practice. P.J. I 27: tasya ( = iishvara'sya) vaacakaH praNavaH Bhoja-deva: [...] nauti stautiiti vaa **praNava oMkaaraH** [...]
[FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: My own skills stand as an anecdotal support to these studies, although my staying time is WAY longer than any that were found in the studies :-) OffWorld (Scottish born and bred) Ain't no Norwegian Wood even harder?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Everything that's wrong with American politics, in one photo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://tinyurl.com/6nbfnx All that's missing is Bob Barker. It makes Leni Riefenstahl's iconic images of Hitler's Germany look classy. *** LR's Olympia is classy, which is why Time in 2005 called it one of the greatest 100 films of the last 80 years.: http://listing-index.ebay.com/movies/Olympia_(film).html http://listing-index.ebay.com/movies/Olympia_(film).html As far as the backdrop at the Denver confab, at first the election campaigns were pretty sedate affairs, but all American elections have been a circus since the 1800 election fiasco, which resembled modern contests in every way. So Bob Barker or some other carny obviously suits the American group consciousness (Mencken: Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1800 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1800
[FairfieldLife] Kapil Sharma on GPS!
From Kapil Sharma's GeoBlog on www.gypsii.com (start reading from to bottom, if at all...) Posted by View Person Kapil Sharma at 09:16 AM GyPSii for Apple iPhone: GyPSii is a geo-location and social networking service. The application puts several different services onto the iPhone and is used by going to the GyPSii site on the iPhone web browser. Features GyPSii offers include geo-location services offering the ability for users to navigate to the location their favorite people are at. Location based searches for people and places are offered as well. 1 Comments Aug 25 The UTM Grid (Universal Transverse Mercator) in GPS: Posted by View Person Kapil Sharma at 09:11 AM The UTM Grid (Universal Transverse Mercator) : The UTM grid is a metric grid system based on 60 grid zones around the globe and a set of values in meters from reference points of the grid. Often your GPS receiver will not reference the Band Letter only Zone, and Meters Easting and Meters Northing. A typical coordinate that you might see on a GPS receiver would look like the one below: 12 59095E 3785889N This means that the location is in Zone 12 and is 59,095 meters Easting, and 3,785,899 meters Northing. 0 Comments Aug 25 GPS Accuracy Posted by View Person Kapil Sharma at 09:09 AM Accuracy: The accuracy of the receivers is dependent on the number and quality of the signals it is getting from the satellites and from a factor called Selected Availability. Selected Availability is an intentional error that is introduced into the signals coming from the Satellites that create readings that can be off as much as 300 feet. Even so, the accuracy levels with Selected Availability turned on, is usually within 100 ft. or better. 0 Comments Aug 25 Operating Principles of GPS: Posted by View Person Kapil Sharma at 09:09 AM Operating Principles: The basis of the GPS technology is a set of 24 satellites that are continuously orbiting the earth. These satellites are equipped with atomic clocks and send out radio signals as to the exact time and their location. These radio signals from the satellites are picked up by the GPS receiver. Once the GPS receiver locks on to four or more of these satellites, it can triangulate its location from the known positions of the satellites. This is a very simple explanation, but unless you are a surveyor or engineer who needs to understand how to use GPS to locate within fractions of an inch, this is all you really need to know. 0 Comments Aug 25 Global Positioning System (GPS) technology intro. Posted by View Person Kapil Sharma at 09:08 AM Global Positioning System (GPS) technology is a great boon to anyone who has the need to navigate either great or small distances. This wonderful navigation technology was actually first available for government use back in the late 1970s. In the past ten or so years, It has been made available to the general public in the form of handheld receivers that use this satellite technology provided by the U.S. government.
[FairfieldLife] 'Hope Leads POW'
Obama Leads McCain by 49% to 43% in Post-ABC Poll Nadine Elsibai Sun Aug 24, 11:53 AM ET Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama leads Republican rival John McCain by 49 percent to 43 percent nationwide among registered voters, according to a Washington Post-ABC News poll released today. if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['V_f.D0wNBmY-']='U=13fk7tqc2%2fN%3dV_f.D0wNBmY-%2fC%3d677453.12823630.13167247.1414694%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d5461244%2fV%3d1'; The results were little changed from a similar survey in mid-July, the Post said. The latest survey was conducted Aug. 19-22, before Obama announced he had chosen Senator Joe Biden of Delaware to be his vice presidential running mate. Three- quarters of registered voters, in answer to a hypothetical question, said choosing Biden wouldn't influence their vote either way, the Post reported. The poll also showed that 20 percent of those who supported Senator Hillary Clinton of New York for the Democratic presidential nomination now support Arizona Senator McCain, while 70 percent of her supporters back Obama, the highest level since she suspended her campaign in June, the Post said. The latest nationwide poll of 1,108 adults included interviews with 916 registered voters. The poll, and the results among registered voters, have a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. To contact the reporter on this story: Nadine Elsibai in Washington at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[FairfieldLife] Re: Everything that's wrong with American politics, in one photo
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: http://tinyurl.com/6nbfnx All that's missing is Bob Barker. It makes Leni Riefenstahl's iconic images of Hitler's Germany look classy. *** LR's Olympia is classy, which is why Time in 2005 called it one of the greatest 100 films of the last 80 years.: http://listing-index.ebay.com/movies/Olympia_(film).html http://listing-index.ebay.com/movies/Olympia_(film).html As far as the backdrop at the Denver confab, at first the election campaigns were pretty sedate affairs, but all American elections have been a circus since the 1800 election fiasco, which resembled modern contests in every way. So Bob Barker or some other carny obviously suits the American group consciousness (Mencken: Nobody ever went broke underestimating the taste of the American public). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_1800 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_presidential_election,_180 0 I heard it was designed by the 'Super-Bowl' people... In America, politics is kind of like football... It sort of has the double-wide trailer look- Like a stage for Madonna or Micheal Jackson. So, it's kind of perfect for the Clintons... Hopefully the actually stadium will be less hokee.. Barack is hoping for a 'Beatles-Like reception'... 'Imagine there's no country, it isn't hard to do... Nothing to kill or die for, and no religion too!' 'Here comes the Sun'... What a celebrity he is! Wowy Zowy... R.G.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Speaking of the caucuses...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, mainstream20016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote: On Aug 23, 2008, at 11:52 AM, authfriend wrote: Excerpt: This documentary is about the disenfranchising of American citizens by the Democratic Party and the Obama Campaign Democrats have sent in their stories from all parts of America. We want to be heard and let the country know how our party has sanctioned the actions of what we feel are Obama campaign Chicago Machine dirty politics. We believe this infamous campaign of change from Chicago encouraged and created an army to steal caucus packets, falsify documents, change results, allow unregistered people to vote, scare and intimidate Hillary supporters, stalk them, threaten them, lock them out of their polling places, silence their voices and stop their right to vote, which is, of course, all documented in We Will Not Be Silenced. OK, Judy's right, I'll finally admit it. Obama won in Iowa after carefully and secretly organizing an army of supporters to threaten, bully, intimidate and even slap around Hillary's supporters. I managed to get a copy of the instructions, and smacking around the opposition was the # 1 priority--by any means necessary, and all that, you know. They thought they could keep it a secret, but Hill's crack team was just too good. My candidate lost, and I won't let you forget it! Boo hoo. Sal Long ago I learned political campaigns project mercilessly upon their opponents. Hillary diehards project ceaselessly. Virtually everything they say about Obama is rarely accurate about BHO, but is true about Hillary multiple times over Thanks, Sal, for temporarily deflating the Projection Machine. For the Dems Caucus in Washington State...we were told to wear boots and bring whips (it's kind of kinky in Seattle(only kidding) Actually it was very peaceful; no problems at all. It was all computerized, and they had the results in about two hours. Obama got 2/3 if the total vote there... R.G.
[FairfieldLife] How does a God stop being a God?
How does a God stop being a God? We think in secret… and it comes to pass… this world… this land… is but our looking glass…… Alice in Wonderland. How does a God stop being a god? How does a God… that is assumed; within that term, to be ALL POWERFUL… ALL KNOWING…. INFINITE….. UNLIMITED….. Or dare we say the Lord him/her self Stop BEING a God? How does a God, PRETEND NOT to Be a God….. NOT to KNOW or NOT REMEMBER who it is… or Not REMEMBER the POWER that is contained within it’s self…? The Game of PRETEND … NOT TO KNOW… who you are, has became a fun game for the Immortal ALL POWERFUL Ones…. Just imagine, you have AMNESIA; you have forgotten your true name, rank and signature pattern. This allows you to lower yourself to that peasant on the street.. Or get into a big drawn out DRAMA with your family or friends. Or even Perhaps, you have chose to paint your picture “of self” as one of those scoundrels who takes advantage of people for your own personal gain… and the stories of what we identify as “OUR LIFE” takes on a whole new meaning as we take a moment to to view our display of our self from a NEW POINT OF VIEW. What is it that is behind your eyes? Who do you SEE when you VIEW YOU in the Mirror of Life? What MIND with IMAGINATIONS have not only HELD within your mind the capturing of your self-identities; and has also integrated your self within each and every one of those Illusionary Dreams to become the ILLUSIONS from your mind. If you start from a simple point of VIEW FIRST… that YOU… that glorious person who’s eyes are capturing these words and integrating them within that mind within you… in these precious few moment… you and I, YOU, and this written message from within you, YOU, the reader are ALL the SAME ONE. Someplace within you, YOU have PROJECTED a writing, a book, a scribe, to bare witness to who you be. This scribe is one within you. You are the author of the message and the reader. Without your eyes to view these words; without your mind to understand and capture the signature pattern of these words,this message does not exist for you. This message is a signature pattern of Vibrations that are captured together. These words that appear to be projected onto this objected that you are viewing, is an amalgamated pattern that is WHOLE and COMPLETE. It represents an unseen ENERGY amalgamated. This PATTERING that is the very essence of YOU... or COSMIC FORCES; simply VIBRATES and represents ONE SIGNATURE PATTERN; One POINT OF VIEW; in the billions upon billions of wave forms. Behind this message; there is THE ONE; an energy pattern representing ONE FOCAL POINT of attention, within billions of choices displayed as a projected picture of vibrations. This is a transcendent point for you today. A CHOICE POSSIBILITY. Something within you today has gathered this one single projected picture vibrations and captured a messaged for you to ride a wave of YOU... THE ONE... and integrate it NOW within you. Behind this message… YOU, THE ONE, is there… behind all peoples faces, places, things, times, and events… YOU ARE THERE. You are the ONLY ONE. You have taken a thought within you and released it as a ENERGY Pattern; this is the RAW MATERIAL that grants life to ALL THINGS. This Energy PATTERN has came together and created a WHOLE WAVE FORM…that can be perceived within any dimension or time wave you can IMAGINE. These are simply SHIFTS in POINTS of VIEW of the ILLUSIONS of your dreams. This same CREATIVE FORCES that is a CREATION that has been projection into motion from within you; the MIND of the CREATOR from the beginning. This same Creative Forces is constantly being CHANGED to fit any THOUGHT or IDEA you and imagine. And it is all an illusion. This BEGINNING PLACE; the PLACE before the ENERGY was projected; can also be termed the Is-ness, “God” God-ess, ALL that is; The Father Mother God Principle; Cosmic MIND… or what ever you need to term it. The Energy PROJECTED.. That is a CREATION; that is like a dew drop falling in a misty morning.. falling from the ideas and thoughts that are YOU... THE ONE; This ONE FOCUSED THOUGHT became a VIBRATION of ENERGY…. And congregated as a WHOLE SIGNATURE PATTERN… you might call it a Projection, Construction of Energy, a Self-Projection or a Self Portrait. You are the AUTHOR of this message… You are the Receiver of this message… You are ALL PARTS in-between this message from the beginning to this very moment that your eyes are viewing this message. You are the ALPHA… The Beginning and The Omega… The End…. You are ALL THINGS in-between; you are captured in the FACES of the Masses and the great words of The ONE…. You are the Air that you breath… the food that you eat… and each and every story that captures your attention in every moment. You are the ONLY ONE…. You pretend NOT to know where the other players are hiding… but all of those that are hiding are you. You have simply forgotten that you are just “PRETENDING”… and you have became entrapped and
[FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louis McKenzie Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:40 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy Thanks guys for your support. Everyone that has written I need it. I do chant Gayatri Mantra but I do not know Mahamritunjaya Mantra..If you know it please send it to me. If you know where I can hear it please send me to the link. THANKS ALL Your support is very helpful. I read your whole thing too and I really admire your integrity and determination. I hope you end up comfortably affluent without too much more stress and strain in getting there. Agreed totally. Thumbs up Louis ! And I think you gathered all that strenght from your character and your TM-Programme. Stay regular in your practise - no mumbo-jumbo-mantras necessary !
[FairfieldLife] Q A type lessons
Delhi Institute of Management Services Dear friends, We are extremely happy to welcome you to the world of Management... We are in the process of preparing some 5 minutes revision Q A type lessons for management students. They are in no way, a replacement for the classroom lectures, textbooks or any other study guides. If you wish to go through these lessons. Please visit today's BLOG Learn MARKETING, where customer is King http://dmmsem22a.blogspot.com/2008/07/learn-marketing-where-customer-is\ -king.html : http://dmmsem22a.blogspot.com/ http://dmmsem22a.blogspot.com/ We want you to suggest improvements or corrections if any, by Email to Ms Sheetal varma, (Senior HR Executive). Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are looking for a job or you want to change a job, please send your resume to Ms Sheetal (Senior HR Executive). She will try to help you to find a suitable job. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Dims Faculty and staff CAREER TRAINING Join University Recognized Courses MBA {BM} MBA {HR}, MBA {MKT}, and MBA {Fin}, MCA, BCA, MMC, BMC, B.com M.com M.Insurance, B.Fashion For Career Development and Job Promotions. CONTACT: Delhi Institute of Management Services, Study Centre of NMiMS UNIVERSITY, GURU JAMBHESHWAR UNIVERSITY, JAMIA HAMDARD UNIVERSITY, AIMA, PUNJAB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY. 1108 Akashdeep Building, New Delhi 110001 TEL FAX: 23312187, TEL: 23316475. To stay in touch please Visit: http://aardvarkmailinglist.net/fml/s/sama/?action=addc=20102AHWl=11925 http://aardvarkmailinglist.net/fml/s/sama/?action=addc=20102AHWl=1192\ 5 If you do not want to receive such mail in future. Please send mail Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Reference: Mailer 2
[FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I am writing all of this to say. Even though I may question if perhaps I am a little nuts. I have really gotten to see what happens when one puts principal ahead of security. I think the word you want is 'principle.' I had received money to make an investment 3 years ago. The investors backed out they only want to know when I will give their money back or have money for them. I know that most here express sympathy for your situation, and I do as well, but this legitimate question remains unaddressed in your post. Please note that all of the following information in your post is about *you* and *your* family and *your* lifestyle: My original partners abandoned me 3 years ago. I could have chosen to run away but I did not. In the three years from 2005 till 2008 I was able to send my step daughter to a Waldorf School and allow my wife the time to devote to our toddler. From 6 months pregnant to 3 years old my wife was able to dedicate herself to our children. In Brazil this is not valued, but for me it is very important. I'm sure it is. Did your original investors not getting their money back have any impact on *their* families or *their* lifestyles? I believe that within the next couple of days my funding will be finally in my account. I will put forth the first payment on our home and hopefully get my family back in order. And again, your funding (theoretically, more investment in your business ideas) comes through, and the *first* you do with it is buy a house for you and your family? While the question of how much is left for the business idea or how much goes to repaying your original investors remains unaddressed? I lived in New Mexico for several years. Few people know that Microsoft started there, in Albuquerque. During my time there I ran into probably two dozen people who still spit every time they hear the name Bill Gates because he blew town and moved to Seattle owing them tens of thousands of dollars, and in a few cases hundreds of thousands of dollars. The richest man in the world has never paid those debts. He has never even *acknowledged* those debts. Bill Gates can give away billions of dollars to charity for the rest of his life, but not one of these people he left holding the bag are ever going to have an ounce of respect for him. All I'm suggesting is that as things come around for you and you start to get back on your feet financially, you might want to put some thought into repaying the people who invested in you earlier, instead of referring to them as having backed out on you. I'm sorry, but the almost complete self-absorbtion of your post leads me to believe they might have had some reason for doing so. Even if this is not true, the bottom line is that if you still owe them money, you still owe them money. They didn't *give* you the money, dude...they *invested* in you. If you don't repay their investment, you can write here all you want about how your vision helped you through the struggle, but that's like listening to Bill Gates spout bullshit about how he made billions by being so smart, when in fact he got rich by bailing on his debts.
[FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
In the 1950's, a few people in India helped Maharishi a lot when he was struggling financially. Later on when Maharishi copyrighted the TM and started getting millions of dollars, he ignored them completely.!! He never even acknowledged those who helped him go to the west and establish himself financialy secure. Both Deepak Chopra's father and Chopra helped Maharishi a lot and yet in the end he kicked Chopra out.!! Perhaps both Bill Gates and Maharishi have something in common. --- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 3:28 AM I'm sure it is. Did your original investors not getting their money back have any impact on *their* families or *their* lifestyles? And again, your funding (theoretically, more investment in your business ideas) comes through, and the *first* you do with it is buy a house for you and your family? While the question of how much is left for the business idea or how much goes to repaying your original investors remains unaddressed? I lived in New Mexico for several years. Few people know that Microsoft started there, in Albuquerque. During my time there I ran into probably two dozen people who still spit every time they hear the name Bill Gates because he blew town and moved to Seattle owing them tens of thousands of dollars, and in a few cases hundreds of thousands of dollars. The richest man in the world has never paid those debts. He has never even *acknowledged* those debts. Bill Gates can give away billions of dollars to charity for the rest of his life, but not one of these people he left holding the bag are ever going to have an ounce of respect for him. All I'm suggesting is that as things come around for you and you start to get back on your feet financially, you might want to put some thought into repaying the people who invested in you earlier, instead of referring to them as having backed out on you. I'm sorry, but the almost complete self-absorbtion of your post leads me to believe they might have had some reason for doing so. Even if this is not true, the bottom line is that if you still owe them money, you still owe them money. They didn't *give* you the money, dude...they *invested* in you. If you don't repay their investment, you can write here all you want about how your vision helped you through the struggle, but that's like listening to Bill Gates spout bullshit about how he made billions by being so smart, when in fact he got rich by bailing on his debts. *
[FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the 1950's, a few people in India helped Maharishi a lot when he was struggling financially. Later on when Maharishi copyrighted the TM and started getting millions of dollars, he ignored them completely.!! He never even acknowledged those who helped him go to the west and establish himself financialy secure. Both Deepak Chopra's father and Chopra helped Maharishi a lot and yet in the end he kicked Chopra out.!! Perhaps both Bill Gates and Maharishi have something in common. Exactly. I know that this thread was supposed to be a kind of pity party for Louis and all he's been through, and that we were supposed to express our compassion and our admiration of him sticking to his principles throughout it all. Ok, I *do* feel compassion for his hard times. And on some level I feel some admiration for him sticking to his principles. I just couldn't help noticing that those principles don't seem to involve repaying the people who loaned him money or invested in his busi- ness ideas in the first place. The principles are more about sticking to the purity of his vision. Well, I'm sorry, but I just don't respect that as much as TMers and other spiritual people seem to. And the reason is that over the years I've loaned money to a *lot* of people, *none* of whom ever repaid a dime of it. None of them ever *thought* of repaying a dime of it. They used it to pay for their courses, or their rent, or their business schemes that never worked out, or in one case, their women. And they thought of all of these things they spent the money on as an integral part of their spiritual sadhana, and thus somehow off the books. The general attitude was that if it helps them pursue enlightenment (or what- ever their *personal* goals were), these are not debts that need to be respected but money flowing in from the universe -- an expression of support of nature. Excuse me, but the money flowing in was an expres- sion of a friend trying to help them, a friend who did not have that much money in the first place, and had to do without a few things himself f*in order to* help them out. Not a penny ever got repaid. And not *one* of them ever felt bad about it. I think there is something *wrong* with this. I think that it's wrong when some meditator bums money to pay his rent because he's too evolved to work, and I think there is something wrong with it when someone meditator comes up with a get rich quick scheme and winds up defrauding a number of his meditating friends when the scheme goes belly up. Louis may NOT have had anything like this in mind; the whole problem may be that he wrote what he did without clarifying the details of these people who backed him who are now so unevolved as to want their money back. It could be a simple failure of language, and I may be up on my soapbox without cause. If so, I apologize in advance. But the whole schtick in this post was principle, and I for one couldn't help but notice that the one principle that kept getting ignored was *paying back* the people who invested money. If it had been me, I would have gone wherever I could have found work and paid back every penny. *Then* I would have started over on some new plan. That's my definition of commitment, belief, trust, and how to deal with adversity. You can call me non-spiritual for feeling this way if you want, but that's how I feel. Principle is not found in the glorious plans one talks about or pitches to others, but in what one DOES when those plans some- times don't work out. --- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 3:28 AM I'm sure it is. Did your original investors not getting their money back have any impact on *their* families or *their* lifestyles? And again, your funding (theoretically, more investment in your business ideas) comes through, and the *first* you do with it is buy a house for you and your family? While the question of how much is left for the business idea or how much goes to repaying your original investors remains unaddressed? I lived in New Mexico for several years. Few people know that Microsoft started there, in Albuquerque. During my time there I ran into probably two dozen people who still spit every time they hear the name Bill Gates because he blew town and moved to Seattle owing them tens of thousands of dollars, and in a few cases hundreds of thousands of dollars. The richest man in the world has never paid those debts. He has never even *acknowledged* those debts. Bill Gates can give away billions of dollars to charity for the rest of his life, but not one of these people he left holding the bag are ever going to have an ounce of respect for him. All I'm suggesting is that as things come around for you and you start to get back on your feet
[FairfieldLife] 'McCain/Schmitt= Mocking Hope!'
The Republican Machine is worse than the Clinton Machine, for sure... It grinds and squeals and mocks... It's really ugly and produces ugly results. They are the anti-hero, that got shot down. POW mentality for all...sad and angry man, Trying to outdo his DAD, like Bush! Admiral McCain was HIS DAD... He wanted to commit suicide many times. He is unstable, which is why he always looks so tense... Just like Bush. They mock life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness. They mock anything loving. This is sad, but true. They are a brain-washing machine. They are not logical, and people influenced by them, Do not make logical choices. Will Obama/Biden get down to play in the mud, With these Pigs? That is the dilemma R.G.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
Thanks. I thought I made it clear but I guess I did not. My partners and the investors are different people. I have kept going the whole time to be able to pay the investors their money back. I have taken responsibility for their money even if they have not been willing to assist me at all. They invested because they thought I was working for my partners. They had a responsibility to cover the company and my personal expenses while I built the company. The Partners got friends to put up money and then they abandoned. They thought they had me in a position that they would own the major portion of the company even if they did not uphold their responsibilities. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 7:28 AM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I am writing all of this to say. Even though I may question if perhaps I am a little nuts. I have really gotten to see what happens when one puts principal ahead of security. I think the word you want is 'principle.' I had received money to make an investment 3 years ago. The investors backed out they only want to know when I will give their money back or have money for them. I know that most here express sympathy for your situation, and I do as well, but this legitimate question remains unaddressed in your post. Please note that all of the following information in your post is about *you* and *your* family and *your* lifestyle: My original partners abandoned me 3 years ago. I could have chosen to run away but I did not. In the three years from 2005 till 2008 I was able to send my step daughter to a Waldorf School and allow my wife the time to devote to our toddler. From 6 months pregnant to 3 years old my wife was able to dedicate herself to our children. In Brazil this is not valued, but for me it is very important. I'm sure it is. Did your original investors not getting their money back have any impact on *their* families or *their* lifestyles? I believe that within the next couple of days my funding will be finally in my account. I will put forth the first payment on our home and hopefully get my family back in order. And again, your funding (theoretically, more investment in your business ideas) comes through, and the *first* you do with it is buy a house for you and your family? While the question of how much is left for the business idea or how much goes to repaying your original investors remains unaddressed? I lived in New Mexico for several years. Few people know that Microsoft started there, in Albuquerque. During my time there I ran into probably two dozen people who still spit every time they hear the name Bill Gates because he blew town and moved to Seattle owing them tens of thousands of dollars, and in a few cases hundreds of thousands of dollars. The richest man in the world has never paid those debts. He has never even *acknowledged* those debts. Bill Gates can give away billions of dollars to charity for the rest of his life, but not one of these people he left holding the bag are ever going to have an ounce of respect for him. All I'm suggesting is that as things come around for you and you start to get back on your feet financially, you might want to put some thought into repaying the people who invested in you earlier, instead of referring to them as having backed out on you. I'm sorry, but the almost complete self-absorbtion of your post leads me to believe they might have had some reason for doing so. Even if this is not true, the bottom line is that if you still owe them money, you still owe them money. They didn't *give* you the money, dude...they *invested* in you. If you don't repay their investment, you can write here all you want about how your vision helped you through the struggle, but that's like listening to Bill Gates spout bullshit about how he made billions by being so smart, when in fact he got rich by bailing on his debts. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
Thanks. I thought I made it clear but I guess I did not. My partners and the investors are different people. I have kept going the whole time to be able to pay the investors their money back. I have taken responsibility for their money even if they have not been willing to assist me at all. They invested because they thought I was working for my partners. They had a responsibility to cover the company and my personal expenses while I built the company. The Partners got friends to put up money and then they abandoned. They thought they had me in a position that they would own the major portion of the company even if they did not uphold their responsibilities. So as I stated in the original post I had to agree to a settlement so the settlement is a payment not investment. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 7:28 AM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So I am writing all of this to say. Even though I may question if perhaps I am a little nuts. I have really gotten to see what happens when one puts principal ahead of security. I think the word you want is 'principle.' I had received money to make an investment 3 years ago. The investors backed out they only want to know when I will give their money back or have money for them. I know that most here express sympathy for your situation, and I do as well, but this legitimate question remains unaddressed in your post. Please note that all of the following information in your post is about *you* and *your* family and *your* lifestyle: My original partners abandoned me 3 years ago. I could have chosen to run away but I did not. In the three years from 2005 till 2008 I was able to send my step daughter to a Waldorf School and allow my wife the time to devote to our toddler. From 6 months pregnant to 3 years old my wife was able to dedicate herself to our children. In Brazil this is not valued, but for me it is very important. I'm sure it is. Did your original investors not getting their money back have any impact on *their* families or *their* lifestyles? I believe that within the next couple of days my funding will be finally in my account. I will put forth the first payment on our home and hopefully get my family back in order. And again, your funding (theoretically, more investment in your business ideas) comes through, and the *first* you do with it is buy a house for you and your family? While the question of how much is left for the business idea or how much goes to repaying your original investors remains unaddressed? I lived in New Mexico for several years. Few people know that Microsoft started there, in Albuquerque. During my time there I ran into probably two dozen people who still spit every time they hear the name Bill Gates because he blew town and moved to Seattle owing them tens of thousands of dollars, and in a few cases hundreds of thousands of dollars. The richest man in the world has never paid those debts. He has never even *acknowledged* those debts. Bill Gates can give away billions of dollars to charity for the rest of his life, but not one of these people he left holding the bag are ever going to have an ounce of respect for him. All I'm suggesting is that as things come around for you and you start to get back on your feet financially, you might want to put some thought into repaying the people who invested in you earlier, instead of referring to them as having backed out on you. I'm sorry, but the almost complete self-absorbtion of your post leads me to believe they might have had some reason for doing so. Even if this is not true, the bottom line is that if you still owe them money, you still owe them money. They didn't *give* you the money, dude...they *invested* in you. If you don't repay their investment, you can write here all you want about how your vision helped you through the struggle, but that's like listening to Bill Gates spout bullshit about how he made billions by being so smart, when in fact he got rich by bailing on his debts. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
Pitty Party??? I know that this thread was supposed to be a kind of pity party for Louis and all he's been through, and that we were supposed to express our compassion and our admiration of him sticking to his principles throughout it all. Anyway I dont know what you are talking about. I do know there is a difference between partnerships and investors. If one is a partner then that is much different than an investor. However I am not going into details about my business ventures. I only stated that I am learning what it takes to succeed. Even that you do not have to stop just because the money stops. Get rich quick scheme? dont understand. I thank you for getting one part of my post correct but I guess what you did not understand is a big part of the last three years has been keeping going so I did not lose the money and I would be able to pay the investors back. Partners who quit well maybe for me I have abandonment issues. Yet the investors I have taken the money as if it was my own. As in 100% responsibility for it. You assumed that I would rather buy a house instead of pay them. NoNot true. However I am taking care of my family as well this time. Since the investors could not send 50.00 for food for my family YES I AM PUTTING MY FAMILY FIRST --- On Mon, 8/25/08, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 8:34 AM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In the 1950's, a few people in India helped Maharishi a lot when he was struggling financially. Later on when Maharishi copyrighted the TM and started getting millions of dollars, he ignored them completely.!! He never even acknowledged those who helped him go to the west and establish himself financialy secure. Both Deepak Chopra's father and Chopra helped Maharishi a lot and yet in the end he kicked Chopra out.!! Perhaps both Bill Gates and Maharishi have something in common. Exactly. I know that this thread was supposed to be a kind of pity party for Louis and all he's been through, and that we were supposed to express our compassion and our admiration of him sticking to his principles throughout it all. Ok, I *do* feel compassion for his hard times. And on some level I feel some admiration for him sticking to his principles. I just couldn't help noticing that those principles don't seem to involve repaying the people who loaned him money or invested in his busi- ness ideas in the first place. The principles are more about sticking to the purity of his vision. Well, I'm sorry, but I just don't respect that as much as TMers and other spiritual people seem to. And the reason is that over the years I've loaned money to a *lot* of people, *none* of whom ever repaid a dime of it. None of them ever *thought* of repaying a dime of it. They used it to pay for their courses, or their rent, or their business schemes that never worked out, or in one case, their women. And they thought of all of these things they spent the money on as an integral part of their spiritual sadhana, and thus somehow off the books. The general attitude was that if it helps them pursue enlightenment (or what- ever their *personal* goals were), these are not debts that need to be respected but money flowing in from the universe -- an expression of support of nature. Excuse me, but the money flowing in was an expres- sion of a friend trying to help them, a friend who did not have that much money in the first place, and had to do without a few things himself f*in order to* help them out. Not a penny ever got repaid. And not *one* of them ever felt bad about it. I think there is something *wrong* with this. I think that it's wrong when some meditator bums money to pay his rent because he's too evolved to work, and I think there is something wrong with it when someone meditator comes up with a get rich quick scheme and winds up defrauding a number of his meditating friends when the scheme goes belly up. Louis may NOT have had anything like this in mind; the whole problem may be that he wrote what he did without clarifying the details of these people who backed him who are now so unevolved as to want their money back. It could be a simple failure of language, and I may be up on my soapbox without cause. If so, I apologize in advance. But the whole schtick in this post was principle, and I for one couldn't help but notice that the one principle that kept getting ignored was *paying back* the people who invested money. If it had been me, I would have gone wherever I could have found work and paid back every penny. *Then* I would have started over on some new plan. That's my definition of commitment, belief, trust, and how to deal with adversity. You can call me non-spiritual for feeling
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
My wife says the thing that has bothered her the most about me is my calmness. That I could pass through anything and just meditate and not have any negative emotion. JAI GURU DEV Once we were passing a moment of no money we went six weeks or two months with a rigged electric. Everyday day we chanted Gayatri mantra whole family even my son at the time age 18 months. Then WOW! we came into money again. We paid the light bill paid the school bill and went to the beach. GOD WORKS --- On Mon, 8/25/08, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 6:51 AM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Louis McKenzie Sent: Sunday, August 24, 2008 10:40 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy Thanks guys for your support. Everyone that has written I need it. I do chant Gayatri Mantra but I do not know Mahamritunjaya Mantra..If you know it please send it to me. If you know where I can hear it please send me to the link. THANKS ALL Your support is very helpful. I read your whole thing too and I really admire your integrity and determination. I hope you end up comfortably affluent without too much more stress and strain in getting there. Agreed totally. Thumbs up Louis ! And I think you gathered all that strenght from your character and your TM-Programme. Stay regular in your practise - no mumbo-jumbo-mantras necessary ! To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] 'Does McCain have Anti-Christ Potential'
With the company he keeps, he does... But, Bush is a hard act to follow- In that regard... R.G.
[FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Thanks. I thought I made it clear but I guess I did not. My partners and the investors are different people. I have kept going the whole time to be able to pay the investors their money back. I have taken responsibility for their money even if they have not been willing to assist me at all. Then you have my apologies for suggesting otherwise. As I explained in a subsequent post, I am a little sensitive on this subject. They invested because they thought I was working for my partners. They had a responsibility to cover the company and my personal expenses while I built the company. The Partners got friends to put up money and then they abandoned. They thought they had me in a position that they would own the major portion of the company even if they did not uphold their responsibilities. That is certainly possible, and I commisserate. I have seen this happen with vulture capitalists in the software business -- investing just enough money so that the business is designed to fail, at which point the vulture capitalists own all the intellectual property. Good luck in working things out, and I hope that you are able to make the business a success. My rant was aimed not at you personally but at people I've known who borrowed hundreds of thousands of dollars from friends to create a business, did so, and then spent the first five years' earnings from the business on new cars, houses, and an ostentatious lifestyle. The original friends had to finally sue them to make them pay back the money they could easily have paid back in the first year of successful oper- ation. Suffice it to say they are no longer friends. And all of these people meditated, and thought that they were better than those who didn't. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 7:28 AM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie ltm457@ wrote: So I am writing all of this to say. Even though I may question if perhaps I am a little nuts. I have really gotten to see what happens when one puts principal ahead of security. I think the word you want is 'principle.' I had received money to make an investment 3 years ago. The investors backed out they only want to know when I will give their money back or have money for them. I know that most here express sympathy for your situation, and I do as well, but this legitimate question remains unaddressed in your post. Please note that all of the following information in your post is about *you* and *your* family and *your* lifestyle: My original partners abandoned me 3 years ago. I could have chosen to run away but I did not. In the three years from 2005 till 2008 I was able to send my step daughter to a Waldorf School and allow my wife the time to devote to our toddler. From 6 months pregnant to 3 years old my wife was able to dedicate herself to our children. In Brazil this is not valued, but for me it is very important. I'm sure it is. Did your original investors not getting their money back have any impact on *their* families or *their* lifestyles? I believe that within the next couple of days my funding will be finally in my account. I will put forth the first payment on our home and hopefully get my family back in order. And again, your funding (theoretically, more investment in your business ideas) comes through, and the *first* you do with it is buy a house for you and your family? While the question of how much is left for the business idea or how much goes to repaying your original investors remains unaddressed? I lived in New Mexico for several years. Few people know that Microsoft started there, in Albuquerque. During my time there I ran into probably two dozen people who still spit every time they hear the name Bill Gates because he blew town and moved to Seattle owing them tens of thousands of dollars, and in a few cases hundreds of thousands of dollars. The richest man in the world has never paid those debts. He has never even *acknowledged* those debts. Bill Gates can give away billions of dollars to charity for the rest of his life, but not one of these people he left holding the bag are ever going to have an ounce of respect for him. All I'm suggesting is that as things come around for you and you start to get back on your feet financially, you might want to put some thought into repaying the people who invested in you earlier, instead of referring to them as having backed out on you. I'm sorry, but the almost complete self-absorbtion of your post leads me to believe they might have had some reason for doing so. Even if this is not true, the bottom
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:38 PM, off_world_beings wrote: Maybe so Peter, but only the Scots are clearly documented in peer- reviewed journals to be rated as the best lovers in the world. The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. Anywhere we can find a copy of these studies, off? Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: 'More on AUM'
So, 'OM' is a recent invention - it's not even an esoteric mantra, except by courtesy. 'OM or 'AUM' isn't a bija mantra used in genuine tantric practice. Junior wrote: FYI: Bhoja-deva: [...] nauti stautiiti vaa **praNava oMkaaraH** [...] FYI: King Bhoja lived in 1100 A.D., after the invention of the 'OM' and the rise of the tantric sects. Patanjali lived in 200 B.C. Patanjali didn't mention any 'OM' chanting. In fact, Patanjali doesn't seem to mention anything about any mantras or bija mantras at all in the Yoga Sutras. Apparently, the 'OM' chanting came after Patanjali, as did the composition of most of the tantras. So, 'OM' as a symbol came during the Gupta era, during the age of the alchemists and the siddhas.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:38 PM, off_world_beings wrote: Maybe so Peter, but only the Scots are clearly documented in peer-reviewed journals to be rated as the best lovers in the world. The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. Anywhere we can find a copy of these studies, off? I don't remember the name of the actual journal, but here is a photograph of the Scot author of the study, giving one of the women a ride home after being interviewed for the study. As Off suggested, she probably wanted to take advantage of his superior Scot staying power. http://www.members.aol.com/tantricone/share/sheep.htm
[FairfieldLife] 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain'
Yeah, yeah, yeah... Bring it on, mentality... Do we need more of this? We can't afford more of this, We can't afford any more of this mentality. Just say no, like Ronny used to say; Choosing McCain is just insane... Like Obama says, Doing the same thing over and over, And expecting a different result... R.G.
Re: [FairfieldLife] 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain'
Lets see what happens this week in Colorado. I hope they do something with the Hillary Clinton Coalition like inform them that Hillary will be Secretary of State. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain' To: fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 10:22 AM Yeah, yeah, yeah... Bring it on, mentality... Do we need more of this? We can't afford more of this, We can't afford any more of this mentality. Just say no, like Ronny used to say; Choosing McCain is just insane... Like Obama says, Doing the same thing over and over, And expecting a different result... R.G.
[FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
TurquoiseB wrote: All I'm suggesting is that as things come around for you and you start to get back on your feet financially, you might want to put some thought into repaying the people who invested in you earlier, instead of referring to them as having backed out on you. From 1988 to 1991, Rama's individual tuition rose from roughly one thousand to three thousand dollars per month. He told followers that since NPDS and ASI were actually furthering their careers, they should deduct the increasing payments from their taxes. This enabled Rama to dramatically increase his surprise gift reservoir - while bilking the IRS of millions, in a way that would be difficult to expose. http://www.ex-cult.org/Groups/Rama/wired
[FairfieldLife] Re: 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lets see what happens this week in Colorado. I hope they do something with the Hillary Clinton Coalition like inform them that Hillary will be Secretary of State. I hope they ignore her like the nonentity she is.
Re: [FairfieldLife] 'Does McCain have Anti-Christ Potential'
The stage is set now. McCain will either come into office if he wins and send troops to Georgia and declare war on Iran. Or he will push Israel to do so. Then he will do the offshore drilling and when an accident happens so many beautiful seas will turn black. the US economy??? What is that??? it will not exist. and the country will have to go into Martial Law. This is what John McCain means for America The other side is he will be too afraid of himself to do anything and the results of being a broken war hero will show their head. He will be the first catatonic president. either way bad for america --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] 'Does McCain have Anti-Christ Potential' To: fairfieldlife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 9:41 AM With the company he keeps, he does... But, Bush is a hard act to follow- In that regard... R.G.
[FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
TurquoiseB wrote: You can call me non-spiritual for feeling this way if you want, but that's how I feel. Principle is not found in the glorious plans one talks about or pitches to others, but in what one DOES when those plans some- times don't work out. So, you've still got some 'negative energy' to work out! In 1989, Rama justified to the disciples his rising tuition. I nearly killed myself by accepting your Negative Occult Energy, he said, and now you are going to have to pay for it. http://www.ex-cult.org/Groups/Rama/14.epil-3
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
On Aug 25, 2008, at 8:45 AM, Sal Sunshine wrote: On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:38 PM, off_world_beings wrote: Maybe so Peter, but only the Scots are clearly documented in peer- reviewed journals to be rated as the best lovers in the world. The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. Anywhere we can find a copy of these studies, off? The Scottish Journal of Sheep Husbandry, vol. 4 no.14, pp. 104-389 Parameters in Scottish/Sheep Coitus Performance
[FairfieldLife] And now for the big reveal (or Why Dr. Pete can't vote for Obama)
I've been conducting a social experiment with the participants of FFL. The other day I posted the following: Blacks are better at basketball ...and... On a basketball court, being Black is not a disadvantage. I was very specific in my language. Why? Because I tried to emulate the words of the person who actually spoke those words. By representing them as my own words, I wanted to see what the reaction would be of the participants of FFL. Interestingly, the only person who REALLY opposed the remarks and was disgusted by them was Dr. Pete. The most interesting response was by Louis who not only appeared to agree with the comment but extended the opinition of the dominance of Blacks beyond the basketball court to pretty much every area of human endeavor! And everyone else was somewhere in between these two extremes. And now for the payoff. So who was it that actually said those words? It was none other than... BARACK OBAMA! Here is a transcript of what he said, accompanied by a link to a video of him saying it: Bryant Gumble: So I guess the question becomes -- and I'm not trying to put you on a couch here -- was it basketball you took to right away or was it a chance to identify racially or was it a chance to bond with your father in some fashion, what was the driving force? Barack Obama: I would suspect all of the above and the fact that growing up in Hawaii without a father with not a large African- American population that here was a place where being Black was not a disadvantage, here was a sport in which we were dominant, all those things I think contributed to the idea that there's something special (about basketball). http://tinyurl.com/5spumw Dr. Pete: do you not agree that you should be consistent in your disgust of those words and in light of who actually said them transfer your disgust to Obama? Do you not agree that you cannot vote for him? I mean, how could you vote for someone who said such an awful thing?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
Well Forgiveness and mercy are always important. One thing I have learned is that the road to success is full of opportunity. Some opportunities are good and some not so good. One thing I have learned is that sometimes people dont really care about people. If I dont care about me maybe no one else will either. An investor is one thing a partner is someone with a particular responsibility that the person chooses to take on for a certain percentage of ownership. In this case just as that person is a partner so too am I . Why do you believe that one partner would be any more or less responsible for the results of things than the other. My so called partners in this particular venture thought I was weak and stupid. So they thought they could bully me into giving up my blank Instead they found something else. I dont know what I will do with them . The investors will get their money back, yet as I have never met them I will see what goes with so called partners. Investors= understanding Partners who quit or abandon = anger and uncertainty --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 10:36 AM TurquoiseB wrote: All I'm suggesting is that as things come around for you and you start to get back on your feet financially, you might want to put some thought into repaying the people who invested in you earlier, instead of referring to them as having backed out on you. From 1988 to 1991, Rama's individual tuition rose from roughly one thousand to three thousand dollars per month. He told followers that since NPDS and ASI were actually furthering their careers, they should deduct the increasing payments from their taxes. This enabled Rama to dramatically increase his surprise gift reservoir - while bilking the IRS of millions, in a way that would be difficult to expose. http://www.ex-cult.org/Groups/Rama/wired To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
TurquoiseB wrote: My rant was aimed not at you personally but at people I've known who borrowed hundreds of thousands of dollars from friends to create a business, did so, and then spent the first five years' earnings from the business on new cars, houses, and an ostentatious lifestyle. Generally, this was to be paid in US $100 bills - higher vibratory energy, ex-members say. Gifts and costly special excursions are extra: In practice, members give Lenz almost all their money, according to published reports and ex-followers. They squeeze into shared, unfurnished apartments while he flies in a Lear jet between houses in Long Island, Santa Fe, and Los Angeles. http://www.ex-cult.org/Groups/Rama/wired
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
I don't know Rama. I once had a partner in another business whom when he was excited about things he went out and raised a whole lot of money. He did things and promised things that I would not do. Then when he got depressed he quit. Before he officially quit he told me that he would only quit when he was sure I could not continue. I was not sure what he meant by that. Then I started a venture that actually started making money. He called my new partner's wife a stupid bitch and told bank officers he was me. I began to understand him. I became weary of partners. When Partners lose they sometimes make excuses for the loss, by blaming others. So they bad mouth like gossipers. I like investors not so sure about partners. I have expectation with partners no expectation with investors. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 10:43 AM TurquoiseB wrote: You can call me non-spiritual for feeling this way if you want, but that's how I feel. Principle is not found in the glorious plans one talks about or pitches to others, but in what one DOES when those plans some- times don't work out. So, you've still got some 'negative energy' to work out! In 1989, Rama justified to the disciples his rising tuition. I nearly killed myself by accepting your Negative Occult Energy, he said, and now you are going to have to pay for it. http://www.ex-cult.org/Groups/Rama/14.epil-3 To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:38 PM, off_world_beings wrote: Maybe so Peter, but only the Scots are clearly documented in peer- reviewed journals to be rated as the best lovers in the world. The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. Anywhere we can find a copy of these studies, off? Sal Better find those studies Off - horny old women wants to know where to go on vacation ! :-)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
I am sorry you had this experience. I have seen worst probably called worst. Not a guru For me Sri Sri Ravi Shankar was/is my friend. If he was doing a project or was participating in a project to help other people I would do all I could to help him --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 11:00 AM TurquoiseB wrote: My rant was aimed not at you personally but at people I've known who borrowed hundreds of thousands of dollars from friends to create a business, did so, and then spent the first five years' earnings from the business on new cars, houses, and an ostentatious lifestyle. Generally, this was to be paid in US $100 bills - higher vibratory energy, ex-members say. Gifts and costly special excursions are extra: In practice, members give Lenz almost all their money, according to published reports and ex-followers. They squeeze into shared, unfurnished apartments while he flies in a Lear jet between houses in Long Island, Santa Fe, and Los Angeles. http://www.ex-cult.org/Groups/Rama/wired To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
Scots have the best sperm in Europe, says study http://www.tobacco.org/news/68597.html http://www.tobacco.org/news/68597.html http://www.tobacco.org/news/68597.html --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, lurkernomore20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And I believe it has been documented among your partners that they score much lower on math aptitude having come to believe that what they have been told is 6, in actually 2 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: Maybe so Peter, but only the Scots are clearly documented in peer-reviewed journals to be rated as the best lovers in the world. The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. My own skills stand as an anecdotal support to these studies, although my staying time is WAY longer than any that were found in the studies :-) OffWorld (Scottish born and bred) PS. Why are you the only person in the world that still posts at the top of a thread? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote: Here's the complete and total FACT that will put to rest this ridiculous discussion regarding superiority/inferiority off different ethnic groups. Do you know statistics? If not, sorry, you may not understand this. There are different means (averages) for normally distributed traits in different ethnic populations. For example European-Americans as a group have an average IQ 10 to 15 points higher than the average group IQ for African-Americans, 5 to 7 points higher than Hispanic-Americans and 3 to 6 points lower than Asian Americans. If you control for income the European-American, Hispanic-American and African-American difference disappears, but the Asian still remains. But the important point here is that within group differences are much, much larger than between group differences. WHAT THIS MEANS IS THAT YOU CAN HAVE A EUROPEAN AMERICAN THAT CAN JUMP AND AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN WHO GETS A FULL ACADEMIC SCHOLARSHIP TO MIT. Again within group differences are much, much larger than between group differences. --- On Sun, 8/24/08, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, August 24, 2008, 10:27 PM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, John jr_esq@ wrote: Hey Off, Don't toot your horn so loudly. Our hearing is fairly normal, thanks What's your problem? OffWorld --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: Blacks are better at basketball; Chinese are better at math and engineering; Italians are better cooks. What other groups can you think of in this manner? The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. My own skills stand as an anecdotal support to these studies, although my staying time is WAY longer than any that were found in the studies :-) OffWorld (Scottish born and bred)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain'
She is not the issue. The 18 Million people who voted for her they are the issue. That said I hope they give her something that pulls those 18 million people to Obama --- On Mon, 8/25/08, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain' To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 10:38 AM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lets see what happens this week in Colorado. I hope they do something with the Hillary Clinton Coalition like inform them that Hillary will be Secretary of State. I hope they ignore her like the nonentity she is. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:38 PM, off_world_beings wrote: Maybe so Peter, but only the Scots are clearly documented in peer- reviewed journals to be rated as the best lovers in the world. The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. Anywhere we can find a copy of these studies, off? Sal Scots have the best sperm in Europe, says study http://www.tobacco.org/news/68597.html http://www.tobacco.org/news/68597.html OFfWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote: On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:38 PM, off_world_beings wrote: Maybe so Peter, but only the Scots are clearly documented in peer-reviewed journals to be rated as the best lovers in the world. The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. Anywhere we can find a copy of these studies, off? I don't remember the name of the actual journal, but here is a photograph of the Scot author of the study, giving one of the women a ride home after being interviewed for the study. As Off suggested, she probably wanted to take advantage of his superior Scot staying power. http://www.members.aol.com/tantricone/share/sheep.htm http://www.members.aol.com/tantricone/share/sheep.htm Why do you post photos of your illigitimate sons Turq?. OffWorld
[FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: And I believe it has been documented among your partners that they score much lower on math aptitude having come to believe that what they have been told is 6, in actually 2 They all have graduate degrees unlike you and Lurker :-) OffWorld And the lady can forget about ever getting cab fair home. ...but mountain doesn't move! --- On Mon, 8/25/08, lurkernomore20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: lurkernomore20002000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 12:36 AM And I believe it has been documented among your partners that they score much lower on math aptitude having come to believe that what they have been told is 6, in actually 2 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: Maybe so Peter, but only the Scots are clearly documented in peer-reviewed journals to be rated as the best lovers in the world. The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. My own skills stand as an anecdotal support to these studies, although my staying time is WAY longer than any that were found in the studies :-) OffWorld (Scottish born and bred) PS. Why are you the only person in the world that still posts at the top of a thread? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Peter drpetersutphen@ wrote: Here's the complete and total FACT that will put to rest this ridiculous discussion regarding superiority/inferiority off different ethnic groups. Do you know statistics? If not, sorry, you may not understand this. There are different means (averages) for normally distributed traits in different ethnic populations. For example European-Americans as a group have an average IQ 10 to 15 points higher than the average group IQ for African-Americans, 5 to 7 points higher than Hispanic-Americans and 3 to 6 points lower than Asian Americans. If you control for income the European-American, Hispanic-American and African-American difference disappears, but the Asian still remains. But the important point here is that within group differences are much, much larger than between group differences. WHAT THIS MEANS IS THAT YOU CAN HAVE A EUROPEAN AMERICAN THAT CAN JUMP AND AN AFRICAN-AMERICAN WHO GETS A FULL ACADEMIC SCHOLARSHIP TO MIT. Again within group differences are much, much larger than between group differences. --- On Sun, 8/24/08, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Sunday, August 24, 2008, 10:27 PM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , John jr_esq@ wrote: Hey Off, Don't toot your horn so loudly. Our hearing is fairly normal, thanks What's your problem? OffWorld --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , off_world_beings no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ wrote: Blacks are better at basketball; Chinese are better at math and engineering; Italians are better cooks. What other groups can you think of in this manner? The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. My own skills stand as an anecdotal support to these studies, although my staying time is WAY longer than any that were found in the studies :-) OffWorld (Scottish born and bred)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
On Aug 25, 2008, at 9:11 AM, off_world_beings wrote: Anywhere we can find a copy of these studies, off? Sal Scots have the best sperm in Europe, says study http://www.tobacco.org/news/68597.html Um, off, when I clicked on Jump to full article, it showed a blank page...could this be some kind of cosmic commentary? The whole thing sounds like a joke. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, off_world_beings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Sal Sunshine salsunshine@ wrote: On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:38 PM, off_world_beings wrote: Maybe so Peter, but only the Scots are clearly documented in peer-reviewed journals to be rated as the best lovers in the world. The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. Anywhere we can find a copy of these studies, off? I don't remember the name of the actual journal, but here is a photograph of the Scot author of the study, giving one of the women a ride home after being interviewed for the study. As Off suggested, she probably wanted to take advantage of his superior Scot staying power. http://www.members.aol.com/tantricone/share/sheep.htm http://www.members.aol.com/tantricone/share/sheep.htm Why do you post photos of your illigitimate sons Turq?. OffWorld Son I thought Turk was having his way with him. After all, the sheep really does look quite happy. Now I suppose we have to add incest to Barry's many accomplishments.
[FairfieldLife] 'New Delhi News'
http://www.organiser.org/dynamic/
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain'
I hope they ignore her like the nonentity she is. Ditto. Anyway, I believe it's standard operating procedure to wait until one actually wins the general election to choose the cabinet. ...but mountain doesn't move! --- On Mon, 8/25/08, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain' To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 9:38 AM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lets see what happens this week in Colorado. I hope they do something with the Hillary Clinton Coalition like inform them that Hillary will be Secretary of State. I hope they ignore her like the nonentity she is. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
Generally, this was to be paid in US $100 bills - higher vibratory energy, ex-members say. Gifts and costly special excursions are extra: In practice, members give Lenz almost all their money, according to published reports and ex-followers. They squeeze into shared, unfurnished apartments while he flies in a Lear jet between houses in Long Island, Santa Fe, and Los Angeles. I'm more impressed with the TMO's laundering skills. Turg, your former leader was either insane or the biggest asshole to ever occupy a human body. ...but mountain doesn't move! --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 10:00 AM TurquoiseB wrote: My rant was aimed not at you personally but at people I've known who borrowed hundreds of thousands of dollars from friends to create a business, did so, and then spent the first five years' earnings from the business on new cars, houses, and an ostentatious lifestyle. Generally, this was to be paid in US $100 bills - higher vibratory energy, ex-members say. Gifts and costly special excursions are extra: In practice, members give Lenz almost all their money, according to published reports and ex-followers. They squeeze into shared, unfurnished apartments while he flies in a Lear jet between houses in Long Island, Santa Fe, and Los Angeles. http://www.ex-cult.org/Groups/Rama/wired To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
RE: [FairfieldLife] Q A type lessons
Membership removed. From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LALIT KHUNGAR Sent: Monday, August 25, 2008 5:11 AM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Q A type lessons Delhi Institute of Management Services Dear friends, We are extremely happy to welcome you to the world of Management... We are in the process of preparing some 5 minutes revision Q A type lessons for management students. They are in no way, a replacement for the classroom lectures, textbooks or any other study guides. If you wish to go through these lessons. Please visit today's BLOG Learn http://dmmsem22a.blogspot.com/2008/07/learn-marketing-where-customer-is-kin g.html MARKETING, where customer is King: http://dmmsem22a.blogspot.com/ We want you to suggest improvements or corrections if any, by Email to Ms Sheetal varma, (Senior HR Executive). Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] If you are looking for a job or you want to change a job, please send your resume to Ms Sheetal (Senior HR Executive). She will try to help you to find a suitable job. Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dims Faculty and staff CAREER TRAINING Join University Recognized Courses MBA {BM} MBA {HR}, MBA {MKT}, and MBA {Fin}, MCA, BCA, MMC, BMC, B.com M.com M.Insurance, B.Fashion For Career Development and Job Promotions. CONTACT: Delhi Institute of Management Services, Study Centre of NMiMS UNIVERSITY, GURU JAMBHESHWAR UNIVERSITY, JAMIA HAMDARD UNIVERSITY, AIMA, PUNJAB TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY. 1108 Akashdeep Building, New Delhi 110001 TEL FAX: 23312187, TEL: 23316475. To stay in touch please Visit: http://aardvarkmailinglist.net/fml/s/sama/?action=add http://aardvarkmailinglist.net/fml/s/sama/?action=addc=20102AHWl=11925 c=20102AHWl=11925 If you do not want to receive such mail in future. Please send mail Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reference: Mailer 2 Internal Virus Database is out of date. Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com Version: 8.0.138 / Virus Database: 270.5.10/1584 - Release Date: 7/31/2008 12:00 PM
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others
Better find those studies Off - horny old women wants to know where to go on vacation ! :-) Not so easy to do..With the value of the US dollar versus the pound and the cost of jet fuel, it costs too much money for a vacation trip to Scotland. Have to settle for Americans. ...but mountain doesn't move! --- On Mon, 8/25/08, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Certain ethnic/race groups are better at some things than others To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 10:06 AM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 24, 2008, at 10:38 PM, off_world_beings wrote: Maybe so Peter, but only the Scots are clearly documented in peer- reviewed journals to be rated as the best lovers in the world. The Scots are known to be the best lovers. In one survey, women in Europe put the Scots as number one best lovers, and in an other study, the Scottish men were found to have the longest average lovemaking times with women, half again as much than the average American, who was low on the list. These studies therefore support each other. Yes, all this in peer-reviewed journals. Anywhere we can find a copy of these studies, off? Sal Better find those studies Off - horny old women wants to know where to go on vacation ! :-) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain'
What does standard have to do with it? --- On Mon, 8/25/08, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain' To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 11:55 AM I hope they ignore her like the nonentity she is. Ditto. Anyway, I believe it's standard operating procedure to wait until one actually wins the general election to choose the cabinet. ...but mountain doesn't move! --- On Mon, 8/25/08, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain' To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 9:38 AM --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Lets see what happens this week in Colorado. I hope they do something with the Hillary Clinton Coalition like inform them that Hillary will be Secretary of State. I hope they ignore her like the nonentity she is. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] Portal to Maya Underworld Found in Mexico?
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080822-maya-maze.html Link Portal to Maya Underworld Found in Mexico? Alexis Okeowo in México City for National Geographic News August 22, 2008 A labyrinth filled with stone temples and pyramids in 14 caves—some underwater—have been uncovered on Mexico's Yucatán Peninsula, archaeologists announced last week. The discovery has experts wondering whether Maya legend inspired the construction of the underground complex—or vice versa. According to Maya myth, the souls of the dead had to follow a dog with night vision on a horrific and watery path and endure myriad challenges before they could rest in the afterlife. In one of the recently found caves, researchers discovered a nearly 300-foot (90-meter) concrete road that ends at a column standing in front of a body of water. (...)
[FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
There's a technique to lending money that works really well to increase the odds of getting repaid. When a person approaches you and asks to borrow, he is usually very upbeat, and cooperative with the terms, and the ' lender ' at that point has maximum leverage. As the potential lender, Ask the following questions: How much money do you need to borrow ? When do you need the money ? When can you repay ? After the borrower answers those three questions, the lender the directs the borrower to write a check to lender, for amount to be loaned, dated the agreed repayment date. Asking for the repayment check upfront as a necessary condition to the loan eliminates having to ' remind ' the borrower of his obligation, and prevents 'misunderstandings' and tremendously minimizes the hassle of lending. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason jedi_spock@ wrote: In the 1950's, a few people in India helped Maharishi a lot when he was struggling financially. Later on when Maharishi copyrighted the TM and started getting millions of dollars, he ignored them completely.!! He never even acknowledged those who helped him go to the west and establish himself financialy secure. Both Deepak Chopra's father and Chopra helped Maharishi a lot and yet in the end he kicked Chopra out.!! Perhaps both Bill Gates and Maharishi have something in common. Exactly. I know that this thread was supposed to be a kind of pity party for Louis and all he's been through, and that we were supposed to express our compassion and our admiration of him sticking to his principles throughout it all. Ok, I *do* feel compassion for his hard times. And on some level I feel some admiration for him sticking to his principles. I just couldn't help noticing that those principles don't seem to involve repaying the people who loaned him money or invested in his busi- ness ideas in the first place. The principles are more about sticking to the purity of his vision. Well, I'm sorry, but I just don't respect that as much as TMers and other spiritual people seem to. And the reason is that over the years I've loaned money to a *lot* of people, *none* of whom ever repaid a dime of it. None of them ever *thought* of repaying a dime of it. They used it to pay for their courses, or their rent, or their business schemes that never worked out, or in one case, their women. And they thought of all of these things they spent the money on as an integral part of their spiritual sadhana, and thus somehow off the books. The general attitude was that if it helps them pursue enlightenment (or what- ever their *personal* goals were), these are not debts that need to be respected but money flowing in from the universe -- an expression of support of nature. Excuse me, but the money flowing in was an expres- sion of a friend trying to help them, a friend who did not have that much money in the first place, and had to do without a few things himself f*in order to* help them out. Not a penny ever got repaid. And not *one* of them ever felt bad about it. I think there is something *wrong* with this. I think that it's wrong when some meditator bums money to pay his rent because he's too evolved to work, and I think there is something wrong with it when someone meditator comes up with a get rich quick scheme and winds up defrauding a number of his meditating friends when the scheme goes belly up. Louis may NOT have had anything like this in mind; the whole problem may be that he wrote what he did without clarifying the details of these people who backed him who are now so unevolved as to want their money back. It could be a simple failure of language, and I may be up on my soapbox without cause. If so, I apologize in advance. But the whole schtick in this post was principle, and I for one couldn't help but notice that the one principle that kept getting ignored was *paying back* the people who invested money. If it had been me, I would have gone wherever I could have found work and paid back every penny. *Then* I would have started over on some new plan. That's my definition of commitment, belief, trust, and how to deal with adversity. You can call me non-spiritual for feeling this way if you want, but that's how I feel. Principle is not found in the glorious plans one talks about or pitches to others, but in what one DOES when those plans some- times don't work out. --- TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 3:28 AM I'm sure it is. Did your original investors not getting their money back have any impact on *their* families or *their* lifestyles? And again, your funding (theoretically, more
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
this is a good technique as long as the person has the money by the time the check is deposited. Once I did that with a guy and he got money but did not pay. We called the bank verified the money was there and took it. He kept saying he did not have money. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, mainstream20016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: mainstream20016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 12:24 PM There's a technique to lending money that works really well to increase the odds of getting repaid. When a person approaches you and asks to borrow, he is usually very upbeat, and cooperative with the terms, and the ' lender ' at that point has maximum leverage. As the potential lender, Ask the following questions: How much money do you need to borrow ? When do you need the money ? When can you repay ? After the borrower answers those three questions, the lender the directs the borrower to write a check to lender, for amount to be loaned, dated the agreed repayment date. Asking for the repayment check upfront as a necessary condition to the loan eliminates having to ' remind ' the borrower of his obligation, and prevents 'misunderstandings' and tremendously minimizes the hassle of lending. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason jedi_spock@ wrote: In the 1950's, a few people in India helped Maharishi a lot when he was struggling financially. Later on when Maharishi copyrighted the TM and started getting millions of dollars, he ignored them completely.!! He never even acknowledged those who helped him go to the west and establish himself financialy secure. Both Deepak Chopra's father and Chopra helped Maharishi a lot and yet in the end he kicked Chopra out.!! Perhaps both Bill Gates and Maharishi have something in common. Exactly. I know that this thread was supposed to be a kind of pity party for Louis and all he's been through, and that we were supposed to express our compassion and our admiration of him sticking to his principles throughout it all. Ok, I *do* feel compassion for his hard times. And on some level I feel some admiration for him sticking to his principles. I just couldn't help noticing that those principles don't seem to involve repaying the people who loaned him money or invested in his busi- ness ideas in the first place. The principles are more about sticking to the purity of his vision. Well, I'm sorry, but I just don't respect that as much as TMers and other spiritual people seem to. And the reason is that over the years I've loaned money to a *lot* of people, *none* of whom ever repaid a dime of it. None of them ever *thought* of repaying a dime of it. They used it to pay for their courses, or their rent, or their business schemes that never worked out, or in one case, their women. And they thought of all of these things they spent the money on as an integral part of their spiritual sadhana, and thus somehow off the books. The general attitude was that if it helps them pursue enlightenment (or what- ever their *personal* goals were), these are not debts that need to be respected but money flowing in from the universe -- an expression of support of nature. Excuse me, but the money flowing in was an expres- sion of a friend trying to help them, a friend who did not have that much money in the first place, and had to do without a few things himself f*in order to* help them out. Not a penny ever got repaid. And not *one* of them ever felt bad about it. I think there is something *wrong* with this. I think that it's wrong when some meditator bums money to pay his rent because he's too evolved to work, and I think there is something wrong with it when someone meditator comes up with a get rich quick scheme and winds up defrauding a number of his meditating friends when the scheme goes belly up. Louis may NOT have had anything like this in mind; the whole problem may be that he wrote what he did without clarifying the details of these people who backed him who are now so unevolved as to want their money back. It could be a simple failure of language, and I may be up on my soapbox without cause. If so, I apologize in advance. But the whole schtick in this post was principle, and I for one couldn't help but notice that the one principle that kept getting ignored was *paying back* the people who invested money. If it had been me, I would have gone wherever I could have found work and paid back every penny. *Then* I would have started over on some new plan. That's my definition of commitment, belief, trust, and how to deal with adversity. You can call me non-spiritual for feeling this way if you want, but that's how I feel. Principle is
[FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, gullible fool [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Generally, this was to be paid in US $100 bills - higher vibratory energy, ex-members say. Gifts and costly special excursions are extra: In practice, members give Lenz almost all their money, according to published reports and ex-followers. They squeeze into shared, unfurnished apartments while he flies in a Lear jet between houses in Long Island, Santa Fe, and Los Angeles. I'm more impressed with the TMO's laundering skills. Turg, your former leader was either insane or the biggest asshole to ever occupy a human body. Very possibly both.
[FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
Well, Louis, when he said he didn't have the money, perhaps he was thinking that his family, their shelter, and their food needs competed with the repayment. Did he offer a substantial partial repayment ? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is a good technique as long as the person has the money by the time the check is deposited. Once I did that with a guy and he got money but did not pay. We called the bank verified the money was there and took it. He kept saying he did not have money. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, mainstream20016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: mainstream20016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 12:24 PM There's a technique to lending money that works really well to increase the odds of getting repaid. When a person approaches you and asks to borrow, he is usually very upbeat, and cooperative with the terms, and the ' lender ' at that point has maximum leverage. As the potential lender, Ask the following questions: How much money do you need to borrow ? When do you need the money ? When can you repay ? After the borrower answers those three questions, the lender the directs the borrower to write a check to lender, for amount to be loaned, dated the agreed repayment date. Asking for the repayment check upfront as a necessary condition to the loan eliminates having to ' remind ' the borrower of his obligation, and prevents 'misunderstandings' and tremendously minimizes the hassle of lending. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason jedi_spock@ wrote: In the 1950's, a few people in India helped Maharishi a lot when he was struggling financially. Later on when Maharishi copyrighted the TM and started getting millions of dollars, he ignored them completely.!! He never even acknowledged those who helped him go to the west and establish himself financialy secure. Both Deepak Chopra's father and Chopra helped Maharishi a lot and yet in the end he kicked Chopra out.!! Perhaps both Bill Gates and Maharishi have something in common. Exactly. I know that this thread was supposed to be a kind of pity party for Louis and all he's been through, and that we were supposed to express our compassion and our admiration of him sticking to his principles throughout it all. Ok, I *do* feel compassion for his hard times. And on some level I feel some admiration for him sticking to his principles. I just couldn't help noticing that those principles don't seem to involve repaying the people who loaned him money or invested in his busi- ness ideas in the first place. The principles are more about sticking to the purity of his vision. Well, I'm sorry, but I just don't respect that as much as TMers and other spiritual people seem to. And the reason is that over the years I've loaned money to a *lot* of people, *none* of whom ever repaid a dime of it. None of them ever *thought* of repaying a dime of it. They used it to pay for their courses, or their rent, or their business schemes that never worked out, or in one case, their women. And they thought of all of these things they spent the money on as an integral part of their spiritual sadhana, and thus somehow off the books. The general attitude was that if it helps them pursue enlightenment (or what- ever their *personal* goals were), these are not debts that need to be respected but money flowing in from the universe -- an expression of support of nature. Excuse me, but the money flowing in was an expres- sion of a friend trying to help them, a friend who did not have that much money in the first place, and had to do without a few things himself f*in order to* help them out. Not a penny ever got repaid. And not *one* of them ever felt bad about it. I think there is something *wrong* with this. I think that it's wrong when some meditator bums money to pay his rent because he's too evolved to work, and I think there is something wrong with it when someone meditator comes up with a get rich quick scheme and winds up defrauding a number of his meditating friends when the scheme goes belly up. Louis may NOT have had anything like this in mind; the whole problem may be that he wrote what he did without clarifying the details of these people who backed him who are now so unevolved as to want their money back. It could be a simple failure of language, and I may be up on my soapbox without cause. If so, I apologize in advance. But the whole schtick in this post was principle, and I for one couldn't help but notice that the one principle that kept
[FairfieldLife] 'Bon Jovi Springstein/Perform Thurs'
Jersey Boys, Go O-Ba-Ma
[FairfieldLife] Crop Circle at Eastfield, Wiltshire, reported 25. August
According to Drpeter the Crop Circles are made by a few english lads with a few beers in them. Well, here's what these lads have been up to lately: http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2008/eastfield4/eastfield2008d.html
Re: [FairfieldLife] Crop Circle at Eastfield, Wiltshire, reported 25. August
Nabs, that looks more like the lads have been smoking reefer! ;-) --- On Mon, 8/25/08, nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: nablusoss1008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Crop Circle at Eastfield, Wiltshire, reported 25. August To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 12:32 PM According to Drpeter the Crop Circles are made by a few english lads with a few beers in them. Well, here's what these lads have been up to lately: http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2008/eastfield4/eastfield2008d.html To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] Re: Crop Circle at Liddington
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nabs, that looks more like the lads have been smoking reefer! ;-) More Crop Circles made during the last few days by lads smoking reefer ! http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2008/liddington/liddington2008.html
[FairfieldLife] Re: 'The War Machine= JOhn mCcain'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie ltm457@ wrote: Lets see what happens this week in Colorado. I hope they do something with the Hillary Clinton Coalition like inform them that Hillary will be Secretary of State. I hope they ignore her like the nonentity she is. I really think she has come go grips with reality, And I think she will always have a high position, In the Dems Party. REally the Clintons are party people(no pun intended). It's the stages of grief these woman are experiences, Because they have been totally dreaming of Hillary as Pres... For years... Many gays and lesbians were also passionately for Hillary... That group has never been too enthusiastic for Obama... They tend to have bought into materialism, and such. But, anyway, the stages of grief: denial, then anger... They are still angry, but will come down from the addiction to victimization, And will not allow themselves to be brainwashed to vote against their own interests, by November 4, 2008. Besides, the younger people will show up in droves, just like they did in the primary, because they know what is at stake: A possible military dictatorship, and reinstituting the draft... R.G. R.G.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Crop Circle at Honey Street
Note that the brits names the top one The Goddess http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2008/honeystreet4/honeystreet2008d.h tml
[FairfieldLife] Crop Circle, Morgan Hill, Wiltshire reported 24. August
http://www.cropcircleconnector.com/2008/morgan/morgan2008.html Still produced by english lads smoking reefer, according to the local FFL expert drpete !
[FairfieldLife] Re: And now for the big reveal (or Why Dr. Pete can't vote for Obama)
(snip) Do you not agree that you cannot vote for him? I mean, how could you vote for someone who said such an awful thing? So, let me see here, what you are judging, and what is your frame of reference... You are a kid with a white mom, and an African black father, who left him. Being a self-aware kid, he began to recognize, that he could do something special, because he saw Michael Jordon levitate, and wanted to somehow, reach the soul of the father, that had abandoned him. Because he had the grace of movement and natural coordination, he was right about his choice, and it turned out to be the love of his life at the time. They even named a three point shot after him, called the 'Obama Shot'... His destiny is very different than most people. All celebrity personalities are different than most people. And who is the strangest and most different of all... And the most scarey, to me, besides Bush: John McCain. He's sold his soul... He's all mask, with nothing inside. He's like the walking dead, like his dark followers... R.G.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy
The guy was a sleeze bag. I dont know what you are thinking. but who said family come before being able to pay back. That is in your head not mine. Timing is my choice as it should be because if I had been of the mind that someone said and just went and got a job and worked to pay them off I would be looking good and taking care of myself. In truth when people say that what they really do is declare bankruptcy. Because in a normal job in a normal life the things that come are more important than the past and the mind does a great job of justification. Better to stick it out and make it work if you really intend to pay. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, mainstream20016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: mainstream20016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 12:42 PM Well, Louis, when he said he didn't have the money, perhaps he was thinking that his family, their shelter, and their food needs competed with the repayment. Did he offer a substantial partial repayment ? --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Louis McKenzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this is a good technique as long as the person has the money by the time the check is deposited. Once I did that with a guy and he got money but did not pay. We called the bank verified the money was there and took it. He kept saying he did not have money. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, mainstream20016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: mainstream20016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: commitment belief trust and adveristy To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 12:24 PM There's a technique to lending money that works really well to increase the odds of getting repaid. When a person approaches you and asks to borrow, he is usually very upbeat, and cooperative with the terms, and the ' lender ' at that point has maximum leverage. As the potential lender, Ask the following questions: How much money do you need to borrow ? When do you need the money ? When can you repay ? After the borrower answers those three questions, the lender the directs the borrower to write a check to lender, for amount to be loaned, dated the agreed repayment date. Asking for the repayment check upfront as a necessary condition to the loan eliminates having to ' remind ' the borrower of his obligation, and prevents 'misunderstandings' and tremendously minimizes the hassle of lending. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Jason jedi_spock@ wrote: In the 1950's, a few people in India helped Maharishi a lot when he was struggling financially. Later on when Maharishi copyrighted the TM and started getting millions of dollars, he ignored them completely.!! He never even acknowledged those who helped him go to the west and establish himself financialy secure. Both Deepak Chopra's father and Chopra helped Maharishi a lot and yet in the end he kicked Chopra out.!! Perhaps both Bill Gates and Maharishi have something in common. Exactly. I know that this thread was supposed to be a kind of pity party for Louis and all he's been through, and that we were supposed to express our compassion and our admiration of him sticking to his principles throughout it all. Ok, I *do* feel compassion for his hard times. And on some level I feel some admiration for him sticking to his principles. I just couldn't help noticing that those principles don't seem to involve repaying the people who loaned him money or invested in his busi- ness ideas in the first place. The principles are more about sticking to the purity of his vision. Well, I'm sorry, but I just don't respect that as much as TMers and other spiritual people seem to. And the reason is that over the years I've loaned money to a *lot* of people, *none* of whom ever repaid a dime of it. None of them ever *thought* of repaying a dime of it. They used it to pay for their courses, or their rent, or their business schemes that never worked out, or in one case, their women. And they thought of all of these things they spent the money on as an integral part of their spiritual sadhana, and thus somehow off the books. The general attitude was that if it helps them pursue enlightenment (or what- ever their *personal* goals were), these are not debts that need to be respected but money flowing in from the universe -- an expression of support of nature. Excuse me, but the money flowing in was an expres- sion of a friend trying to help them, a friend who did not have that much money in the first place, and had to do without a few things himself f*in order to* help them out. Not a penny ever got repaid. And not *one*
[FairfieldLife] Re: And now for the big reveal (or Why Dr. Pete can't vote for Obama)
--Thx Babaji, as usual. Last night somebody appeared to me in a dream saying that Dick Cheney would die of a heart attack soon. (but the exact time frame wasn't given). I'd say within a few weeks. I'm sticking with this as a prediction. If wrong, I will subject myself to the ordeal of saying 1 Hail Mary and 1 Our Father. - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (snip) Do you not agree that you cannot vote for him? I mean, how could you vote for someone who said such an awful thing? So, let me see here, what you are judging, and what is your frame of reference... You are a kid with a white mom, and an African black father, who left him. Being a self-aware kid, he began to recognize, that he could do something special, because he saw Michael Jordon levitate, and wanted to somehow, reach the soul of the father, that had abandoned him. Because he had the grace of movement and natural coordination, he was right about his choice, and it turned out to be the love of his life at the time. They even named a three point shot after him, called the 'Obama Shot'... His destiny is very different than most people. All celebrity personalities are different than most people. And who is the strangest and most different of all... And the most scarey, to me, besides Bush: John McCain. He's sold his soul... He's all mask, with nothing inside. He's like the walking dead, like his dark followers... R.G.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Portal to Maya Underworld Found in Mexico?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2008/08/080822-maya-maze.html Link Portal to Maya Underworld Found in Mexico? Alexis Okeowo in México City for National Geographic News August 22, 2008 A labyrinth filled with stone temples and pyramids in 14 cavessome underwaterhave been uncovered on Mexico's Yucatán Peninsula, archaeologists announced last week. The discovery has experts wondering whether Maya legend inspired the construction of the underground complexor vice versa. According to Maya myth, the souls of the dead had to follow a dog with night vision on a horrific and watery path and endure myriad challenges before they could rest in the afterlife. In one of the recently found caves, researchers discovered a nearly 300-foot (90-meter) concrete road that ends at a column standing in front of a body of water. (...) Fascinating! Link below is for Manly P. Hall who is probably the top most authority on these ancient civilizations and has done some interesting research on them. His contention is that the Mayan civilization 'may' have come from the ancient continents of Atlantis which covered the entire globe at one point, his audio cassette is outstanding on this subject which I have on MP3. http://www.manlyphall.org/articles/manly-p-hall-and-the-mysteries/ One thing refreshing about Manly is he never said he just 'knew', it was always an intellectual analysis based upon empirical research.
[FairfieldLife] 'Biden's Not in it for Lust/Greed/War'
Others seem to have insatiable greed... Others resort to lust, insatiable lust. Let's turn the page on lust and greed, And now and unnecessary war... R.G. Madison, WI
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: And now for the big reveal (or Why Dr. Pete can't vote for Obama)
I'm sticking with this as a prediction. If wrong, I will subject myself to the ordeal of saying 1 Hail Mary and 1 Our Father. I don't think that is enough penance. I think you should search the FFL archives on 'Pleiadian' and read every word of every post until you're certain you are cured. ...but mountain doesn't move! --- On Mon, 8/25/08, yifuxero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: yifuxero [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: And now for the big reveal (or Why Dr. Pete can't vote for Obama) To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 1:20 PM --Thx Babaji, as usual. Last night somebody appeared to me in a dream saying that Dick Cheney would die of a heart attack soon. (but the exact time frame wasn't given). I'd say within a few weeks. I'm sticking with this as a prediction. If wrong, I will subject myself to the ordeal of saying 1 Hail Mary and 1 Our Father. - In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (snip) Do you not agree that you cannot vote for him? I mean, how could you vote for someone who said such an awful thing? So, let me see here, what you are judging, and what is your frame of reference... You are a kid with a white mom, and an African black father, who left him. Being a self-aware kid, he began to recognize, that he could do something special, because he saw Michael Jordon levitate, and wanted to somehow, reach the soul of the father, that had abandoned him. Because he had the grace of movement and natural coordination, he was right about his choice, and it turned out to be the love of his life at the time. They even named a three point shot after him, called the 'Obama Shot'... His destiny is very different than most people. All celebrity personalities are different than most people. And who is the strangest and most different of all... And the most scarey, to me, besides Bush: John McCain. He's sold his soul... He's all mask, with nothing inside. He's like the walking dead, like his dark followers... R.G. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] The Entitlement Virus
Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. I rest my case. All six million of these people are completely, over-the-top, CDC-concern-worthy insane. I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Go to the Free Clinic and get a shot for this virus that has infected you and made you act like Bull Dykes pissed off that a skinny black guy with ill-fitting boxing trunks laid out their heroine in six rounds, without breaking a sweat. She LOST. She's HISTORY. And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Because it's more dangerous. HIV just kills you. The Entitlement Virus kills your soul. It make you think that you *deserve* things, just because of who you are or what you believe. You deserve shit. You lost. Get over it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Entitlement Virus
Nicely put I believe that a lot of the noise is hype. It makes for better entertainment. Conflict sells there are ratings involved and all kinds of things called making entertainment. By Friday Obama will have a great lead over McCain and the clintons will be his greatest supporters. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Entitlement Virus To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 2:57 PM Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. I rest my case. All six million of these people are completely, over-the-top, CDC-concern-worthy insane. I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Go to the Free Clinic and get a shot for this virus that has infected you and made you act like Bull Dykes pissed off that a skinny black guy with ill-fitting boxing trunks laid out their heroine in six rounds, without breaking a sweat. She LOST. She's HISTORY. And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Because it's more dangerous. HIV just kills you. The Entitlement Virus kills your soul. It make you think that you *deserve* things, just because of who you are or what you believe. You deserve shit. You lost. Get over it. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Entitlement Virus
Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. An hour or two ago, someone on CNBC was incredulous Obama had not yet made a gesture to pay off Hillary's campaign debt. The money would, of course, come from the same contributions that would otherwise go toward defeating McCain. ...but mountain doesn't move! --- On Mon, 8/25/08, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] The Entitlement Virus To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 1:57 PM Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. I rest my case. All six million of these people are completely, over-the-top, CDC-concern-worthy insane. I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Go to the Free Clinic and get a shot for this virus that has infected you and made you act like Bull Dykes pissed off that a skinny black guy with ill-fitting boxing trunks laid out their heroine in six rounds, without breaking a sweat. She LOST. She's HISTORY. And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Because it's more dangerous. HIV just kills you. The Entitlement Virus kills your soul. It make you think that you *deserve* things, just because of who you are or what you believe. You deserve shit. You lost. Get over it. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] Long-Term Exposure to Incense Raises Cancer Risk
http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20080825/hl_hsn/longtermexposuretoincenseraisescancerrisk Long-Term Exposure to Incense Raises Cancer Risk By Amanda Gardner HealthDay Reporter 36 minutes ago MONDAY, Aug. 25 (HealthDay News) -- Exposure to burning incense over long periods of time raises the risk of developing cancers of the upper respiratory tract, a new study shows. Interestingly, the practice did not increase the overall risk of lung cancer. Given that our results are backed by numerous experimental studies showing that incense is a powerful producer of particulate matter and that incense smoke contains carcinogenic substances, I believe incense should be used with caution, said study author Dr. Jeppe Friborg, of the department of epidemiology research at Statens Serum Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark. That is, frequent use in rooms where people live should be minimized, or at least sufficient ventilation should be secured. In our study, we find the increased risk of cancer to be present in individuals reporting frequent use of incense for many years, thus, repeated exposure for years should probably be avoided. Others echoed the thought. The American Lung Association is going to add it as a risk factor, said Dr. Norman Edelman, chief medical officer of the association. It's not nearly the danger of smoking a pack a day for 20 years, but it's a danger. Not only is incense burned regularly as part of daily life in large swaths of Asia, the practice is also popular among certain segments in the West. Incense burning produces particulate matter and is known to contain possible carcinogens such as polyaromatic hyodrcarbons (PAHs), carbonyls and benzene. There have also been reports linking the burning of incense with cancer but the results have been inconsistent. For this study, researchers conducted face-to-face interviews with more than 61,000 Singapore Chinese aged 45 to 74 who were cancer-free at the beginning of the study. Incense burning almost doubled the risk of developing squamous cell upper respiratory tract carcinomas including nasal/sinus, tongue, mouth and laryngeal. There was an increased risk both in smokers and in nonsmokers, pointing to an independent effect of incense smoke. There was no overall increased risk of lung cancer, but it did heighten the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Will incense go the way of tobacco? Not necessarily, said some experts. Certainly I think bathing yourself in particles is probably not the smartest thing in the world . . . but I think very few people fill up their room with incense, said Dr. Arthur Frankel, a professor of medicine at Texas AM Health Science Center College of Medicine and director of the Cancer Center, Cancer Research Institute and Division of Hematology/Oncology at Scott White in Temple. The findings, which are in the Oct. 1 issue of Cancer, might also point researchers toward other household practices that should be investigated. It's a population-based study, which means that you can make an association but not necessarily a conclusion, said Dr. Erin Fleener, a clinical assistant professor in internal medicine at the Texas AM Health Science Center College of Medicine and an oncologist at the Bryan-College Station Cancer Clinic. It probably promotes more work in the area of routine household items and things we need to be looking at more prospectively to make a clear cause-and-effect relationship. In general, though, it's not a bad idea to avoid environmental pollutants of various types. Anything that affects air quality negatively is not a good thing, said Dr. Len Horvitz, a pulmonary specialist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. Burning in general and the release of smoke, these things are certainly to be avoided. At the very least, chemical irritants will set off asthma, and that's reversible. Cancer is not reversible. This is not unlike the type of risk that one experiences from secondhand tobacco smoke, said Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. At the end of the day, people who use incense casually, I don't think that's a cause for major concern, but those cultures which embrace incense as part of their daily lifestyles have to consider this has a real potential risk for cancer. More information Visit the National Cancer Institute for more on respiratory cancers.
Re: [FairfieldLife] The Entitlement Virus
TurquoiseB wrote: Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. I rest my case. All six million of these people are completely, over-the-top, CDC-concern-worthy insane. I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Go to the Free Clinic and get a shot for this virus that has infected you and made you act like Bull Dykes pissed off that a skinny black guy with ill-fitting boxing trunks laid out their heroine in six rounds, without breaking a sweat. She LOST. She's HISTORY. And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Because it's more dangerous. HIV just kills you. The Entitlement Virus kills your soul. It make you think that you *deserve* things, just because of who you are or what you believe. You deserve shit. You lost. Get over it. I thought the cartoon link I posted here sort of said it all though it probably could be taken both ways: http://www.comics.com/editoons/lbenson/ (in case you missed it) I'm not a joiner. I am decline to state on the election rolls which is what used to be independent until an Independent Party formed. I'm not convinced that the election is going to solve anything. It is a controlled exercise by the elite anyway. Whomever wins is their puppet , tweedle dee versus tweedle dum (or tweedle dumber). There's nothing much anyone can do about the debt that the Bush Crime Family has put the country into though that has been going on since the Raygun administration (including Clinton). There's always been a war for the robber barons to get their serfs back. They may be winning but I for one will not be anyone's serf. Anyone who thinks I am their serf won't be able to think the next day because they won't have a body to think in. And I won't care about the consequences. I hope millions share my conviction.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. Sure, I'll be happy to explain it to you. The reason it looks like that to you is that you've got practically everything about it wrong. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. In fact, of course, I didn't say either of these things, the quote marks notwithstanding. (And of course, Barry never meant to suggest any such thing.) Actually, Barry made those quotes up out of his own pointy little head. Nor, I'm sure, did he mean to imply, in the first paragraph above, that I've said I'd be voting for McCain. snip I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. No, actually all Hillary supporters are asking for is to be treated decently and with respect. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. Well, no, actually she didn't lose big. As Barry himself notes (ooopsie!), 18 million people (both men and women) voted for her in the primary, either slightly less than or slightly more than Obama, depending on how you count them. It was one of the, if not *the*, most closely contested primaries in history. Traditionally, when the losing candidate has given the winning candidate a good run for his or her money, the winner goes to considerable lengths to reach out to the loser's supporters--both because it's the right thing to do ethically, and pragmatically, because the winner needs their votes in the general. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Only to those consumed by Clinton Derangement Syndrome (or, on this forum, Judy Derangement Syndrome) who are also drunk on Obama-flavor Kool-Aid. (Speaking of Judy Derangement Syndrome, if I had been an Obama devotee, what are the chances that Barry would now be one of those condemning the Democratic Party for having been stupid enough to nominate Obama?) snip And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Well, no, that's actually rather low down on the list of reasons for having supported Hillary. Because it's more dangerous. (Barry, as we all know, believes that Americans are driven by FEAR and takes every opportunity to point out to us how foolish our fears are. Well, *almost* every opportunity, except when he wants us to be afraid of something.) HIV just kills you. The Entitlement Virus kills your soul. It make you think that you *deserve* things, just because of who you are or what you believe. Wish I had a nickel--oh, heck, even a penny--for every time during the primary I heard an Obama supporter suggest that *he* deserved the nomination. Now it's being used as the excuse for refusing to make nice with Hillary's supporters.
[FairfieldLife] Long-Term Exposure to Incense Raises Cancer Risk
http://news.yahoo.com/s/hsn/20080825/hl_hsn/longtermexposuretoincenseraisesc ancerrisk Long-Term Exposure to Incense Raises Cancer Risk By Amanda Gardner HealthDay Reporter 36 minutes ago MONDAY, Aug. 25 (HealthDay News) -- Exposure to burning incense over long periods of time raises the risk of developing cancers of the upper respiratory tract, a new study shows. Interestingly, the practice did not increase the overall risk of lung cancer. Given that our results are backed by numerous experimental studies showing that incense is a powerful producer of particulate matter and that incense smoke contains carcinogenic substances, I believe incense should be used with caution, said study author Dr. Jeppe Friborg, of the department of epidemiology research at Statens Serum Institute in Copenhagen, Denmark. That is, frequent use in rooms where people live should be minimized, or at least sufficient ventilation should be secured. In our study, we find the increased risk of cancer to be present in individuals reporting frequent use of incense for many years, thus, repeated exposure for years should probably be avoided. Others echoed the thought. The American Lung Association is going to add it as a risk factor, said Dr. Norman Edelman, chief medical officer of the association. It's not nearly the danger of smoking a pack a day for 20 years, but it's a danger. Not only is incense burned regularly as part of daily life in large swaths of Asia, the practice is also popular among certain segments in the West. Incense burning produces particulate matter and is known to contain possible carcinogens such as polyaromatic hyodrcarbons (PAHs), carbonyls and benzene. There have also been reports linking the burning of incense with cancer but the results have been inconsistent. For this study, researchers conducted face-to-face interviews with more than 61,000 Singapore Chinese aged 45 to 74 who were cancer-free at the beginning of the study. Incense burning almost doubled the risk of developing squamous cell upper respiratory tract carcinomas including nasal/sinus, tongue, mouth and laryngeal. There was an increased risk both in smokers and in nonsmokers, pointing to an independent effect of incense smoke. There was no overall increased risk of lung cancer, but it did heighten the risk of squamous cell carcinoma of the lung. Will incense go the way of tobacco? Not necessarily, said some experts. Certainly I think bathing yourself in particles is probably not the smartest thing in the world . . . but I think very few people fill up their room with incense, said Dr. Arthur Frankel, a professor of medicine at Texas AM Health Science Center College of Medicine and director of the Cancer Center, Cancer Research Institute and Division of Hematology/Oncology at Scott White in Temple. The findings, which are in the Oct. 1 issue of Cancer, might also point researchers toward other household practices that should be investigated. It's a population-based study, which means that you can make an association but not necessarily a conclusion, said Dr. Erin Fleener, a clinical assistant professor in internal medicine at the Texas AM Health Science Center College of Medicine and an oncologist at the Bryan-College Station Cancer Clinic. It probably promotes more work in the area of routine household items and things we need to be looking at more prospectively to make a clear cause-and-effect relationship. In general, though, it's not a bad idea to avoid environmental pollutants of various types. Anything that affects air quality negatively is not a good thing, said Dr. Len Horvitz, a pulmonary specialist at Lenox Hill Hospital in New York City. Burning in general and the release of smoke, these things are certainly to be avoided. At the very least, chemical irritants will set off asthma, and that's reversible. Cancer is not reversible. This is not unlike the type of risk that one experiences from secondhand tobacco smoke, said Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society. At the end of the day, people who use incense casually, I don't think that's a cause for major concern, but those cultures which embrace incense as part of their daily lifestyles have to consider this has a real potential risk for cancer. More information Visit the National Cancer Institute for more on respiratory cancers.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
authfriend wrote: snip Wish I had a nickel--oh, heck, even a penny--for every time during the primary I heard an Obama supporter suggest that *he* deserved the nomination. Now it's being used as the excuse for refusing to make nice with Hillary's supporters. The bottom line is that many people including many Democrats do not like the Clintons. This is not about Hillary being a woman, it is about her being a Clinton. There are some fools that believed that if she were elected we'd get the prosperity of the Clinton years back. Baloney, that was a bubble and it only happened for a sector of the public. Many were left out. The Clintons are machine politicians. For that matter so is Obama but I'd would rather give him a chance than risk it on Hillary.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
2 thoughts to help explain - the first is that the media here loves conflict, more than anything, and the obama-hillary thing is the only conflict worth hyping in denver. there are quite a few pissed off hillary supporters (closer to 20% than 33%), but it's one thing to still be pissed, another to not vote democratic in november, only a very few very emotionally troubled will do that. I think the PUMAs (most disturbed hillary suppertors) do to feminism what gay pride parades do for gay rights - they set the cause back a few decades by manifesting all the worst stereotypes out there. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. I rest my case. All six million of these people are completely, over-the-top, CDC-concern-worthy insane. I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Go to the Free Clinic and get a shot for this virus that has infected you and made you act like Bull Dykes pissed off that a skinny black guy with ill-fitting boxing trunks laid out their heroine in six rounds, without breaking a sweat. She LOST. She's HISTORY. And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Because it's more dangerous. HIV just kills you. The Entitlement Virus kills your soul. It make you think that you *deserve* things, just because of who you are or what you believe. You deserve shit. You lost. Get over it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, boo_lives [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2 thoughts to help explain - the first is that the media here loves conflict, more than anything, and the obama-hillary thing is the only conflict worth hyping in denver. there are quite a few pissed off hillary supporters (closer to 20% than 33%), but it's one thing to still be pissed, another to not vote democratic in november, only a very few very emotionally troubled will do that. I think the PUMAs (most disturbed hillary suppertors) do to feminism what gay pride parades do for gay rights - they set the cause back a few decades by manifesting all the worst stereotypes out there. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. I rest my case. All six million of these people are completely, over-the-top, CDC-concern-worthy insane. I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Go to the Free Clinic and get a shot for this virus that has infected you and made you act like Bull Dykes pissed off that a skinny black guy with ill-fitting boxing trunks laid out their heroine in six rounds, without breaking a sweat. She LOST. She's HISTORY. And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Because it's more dangerous. HIV just kills you. The Entitlement Virus kills your soul. It make you think that you *deserve* things, just because of who you are or what you believe. You deserve shit. You lost. Get over it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
Hillary and Bill will each speak, primetime, to the Dem convention. Watch for a lukewarm endorsement of Obama from the Clintons, as Hillary and Bill are working for a McCain victory in Novemeber, to set Hillary up for another run in 2012. In ClintonWorld, it's ALL about the Clintons, ALL THE TIME. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. I rest my case. All six million of these people are completely, over-the-top, CDC-concern-worthy insane. I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Go to the Free Clinic and get a shot for this virus that has infected you and made you act like Bull Dykes pissed off that a skinny black guy with ill-fitting boxing trunks laid out their heroine in six rounds, without breaking a sweat. She LOST. She's HISTORY. And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Because it's more dangerous. HIV just kills you. The Entitlement Virus kills your soul. It make you think that you *deserve* things, just because of who you are or what you believe. You deserve shit. You lost. Get over it.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
Actually I think that if Hillary Clinton was Hillary Rodham she would be the VP nominee today.. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Bhairitu [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 4:32 PM authfriend wrote: snip Wish I had a nickel--oh, heck, even a penny--for every time during the primary I heard an Obama supporter suggest that *he* deserved the nomination. Now it's being used as the excuse for refusing to make nice with Hillary's supporters. The bottom line is that many people including many Democrats do not like the Clintons. This is not about Hillary being a woman, it is about her being a Clinton. There are some fools that believed that if she were elected we'd get the prosperity of the Clinton years back. Baloney, that was a bubble and it only happened for a sector of the public. Many were left out. The Clintons are machine politicians. For that matter so is Obama but I'd would rather give him a chance than risk it on Hillary. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
we shall see I hope you are wrong. --- On Mon, 8/25/08, mainstream20016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: mainstream20016 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Date: Monday, August 25, 2008, 5:05 PM Hillary and Bill will each speak, primetime, to the Dem convention. Watch for a lukewarm endorsement of Obama from the Clintons, as Hillary and Bill are working for a McCain victory in Novemeber, to set Hillary up for another run in 2012. In ClintonWorld, it's ALL about the Clintons, ALL THE TIME. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. I rest my case. All six million of these people are completely, over-the-top, CDC-concern-worthy insane. I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Go to the Free Clinic and get a shot for this virus that has infected you and made you act like Bull Dykes pissed off that a skinny black guy with ill-fitting boxing trunks laid out their heroine in six rounds, without breaking a sweat. She LOST. She's HISTORY. And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Because it's more dangerous. HIV just kills you. The Entitlement Virus kills your soul. It make you think that you *deserve* things, just because of who you are or what you believe. You deserve shit. You lost. Get over it. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!'Yahoo! Groups Links
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
Did you notice that Judy snipped the part about Hillary supporters acting like Bull Dykes pissed off that the little black guy knocked out their heroine without breaking a sweat? :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. Sure, I'll be happy to explain it to you. The reason it looks like that to you is that you've got practically everything about it wrong. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. In fact, of course, I didn't say either of these things, the quote marks notwithstanding. (And of course, Barry never meant to suggest any such thing.) Actually, Barry made those quotes up out of his own pointy little head. Nor, I'm sure, did he mean to imply, in the first paragraph above, that I've said I'd be voting for McCain. snip I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. No, actually all Hillary supporters are asking for is to be treated decently and with respect. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. Well, no, actually she didn't lose big. As Barry himself notes (ooopsie!), 18 million people (both men and women) voted for her in the primary, either slightly less than or slightly more than Obama, depending on how you count them. It was one of the, if not *the*, most closely contested primaries in history. Traditionally, when the losing candidate has given the winning candidate a good run for his or her money, the winner goes to considerable lengths to reach out to the loser's supporters--both because it's the right thing to do ethically, and pragmatically, because the winner needs their votes in the general. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Only to those consumed by Clinton Derangement Syndrome (or, on this forum, Judy Derangement Syndrome) who are also drunk on Obama-flavor Kool-Aid. (Speaking of Judy Derangement Syndrome, if I had been an Obama devotee, what are the chances that Barry would now be one of those condemning the Democratic Party for having been stupid enough to nominate Obama?) snip And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Well, no, that's actually rather low down on the list of reasons for having supported Hillary. Because it's more dangerous. (Barry, as we all know, believes that Americans are driven by FEAR and takes every opportunity to point out to us how foolish our fears are. Well, *almost* every opportunity, except when he wants us to be afraid of something.) HIV just kills you. The Entitlement Virus kills your soul. It make you think that you *deserve* things, just because of who you are or what you believe. Wish I had a nickel--oh, heck, even a penny--for every time during the primary I heard an Obama supporter suggest that *he* deserved the nomination. Now it's being used as the excuse for
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you notice that Judy snipped the part about Hillary supporters acting like Bull Dykes pissed off that the little black guy knocked out their heroine without breaking a sweat? :-) Did you also notice how the person who claimed that she wouldn't be commenting on the convention because she was going to be out of town suddenly isn't? :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. Sure, I'll be happy to explain it to you. The reason it looks like that to you is that you've got practically everything about it wrong. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. In fact, of course, I didn't say either of these things, the quote marks notwithstanding. (And of course, Barry never meant to suggest any such thing.) Actually, Barry made those quotes up out of his own pointy little head. Nor, I'm sure, did he mean to imply, in the first paragraph above, that I've said I'd be voting for McCain. snip I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. No, actually all Hillary supporters are asking for is to be treated decently and with respect. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. Well, no, actually she didn't lose big. As Barry himself notes (ooopsie!), 18 million people (both men and women) voted for her in the primary, either slightly less than or slightly more than Obama, depending on how you count them. It was one of the, if not *the*, most closely contested primaries in history. Traditionally, when the losing candidate has given the winning candidate a good run for his or her money, the winner goes to considerable lengths to reach out to the loser's supporters--both because it's the right thing to do ethically, and pragmatically, because the winner needs their votes in the general. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Only to those consumed by Clinton Derangement Syndrome (or, on this forum, Judy Derangement Syndrome) who are also drunk on Obama-flavor Kool-Aid. (Speaking of Judy Derangement Syndrome, if I had been an Obama devotee, what are the chances that Barry would now be one of those condemning the Democratic Party for having been stupid enough to nominate Obama?) snip And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Well, no, that's actually rather low down on the list of reasons for having supported Hillary. Because it's more dangerous. (Barry, as we all know, believes that Americans are driven by FEAR and takes every opportunity to point out to us how foolish our fears are. Well, *almost* every opportunity, except when he wants us to be afraid of something.) HIV just
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
On Aug 25, 2008, at 3:40 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: Did you notice that Judy snipped the part about Hillary supporters acting like Bull Dykes pissed off that the little black guy knocked out their heroine without breaking a sweat? :-) If you think about it, Obama, as the much lesser-known quantity, had nowhere to go but up. Lose, and he's still young enough to try again. Hillary, OTOH, had nowhere to go but down, as the candidate so well-known her nomination seemed all but inevitable. The race really was hers to lose. And she did, spectacularly. (And no, Judy, she lost any way any rational person cares to count. Ignoring the caucuses was a serious mistake, to put it mildly.) Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
She misremembered again. ;-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: Did you notice that Judy snipped the part about Hillary supporters acting like Bull Dykes pissed off that the little black guy knocked out their heroine without breaking a sweat? :-) Did you also notice how the person who claimed that she wouldn't be commenting on the convention because she was going to be out of town suddenly isn't? :-) --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. Sure, I'll be happy to explain it to you. The reason it looks like that to you is that you've got practically everything about it wrong. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. In fact, of course, I didn't say either of these things, the quote marks notwithstanding. (And of course, Barry never meant to suggest any such thing.) Actually, Barry made those quotes up out of his own pointy little head. Nor, I'm sure, did he mean to imply, in the first paragraph above, that I've said I'd be voting for McCain. snip I'm *hoping* that it's a virus, and that somewhere there is a cure, because if this virus really did evolve in low-life places like New Jersey and infect this many people, America is in for some really hard times. Fergit the Pay 'em off with a gas rebate so they'll vote for the retard schtick. This is more insane, more of a Pay us *real* Democrats off with attention and fawning and apologies and maybe, just maybe, we'll vote for THE PERSON WHO WON THE NOMINATION schtick. No, actually all Hillary supporters are asking for is to be treated decently and with respect. Obama WON. Hillary not only LOST, she overspent her way into LOSER HISTORY by doing so. And these six million whiners are trying to tell us that we have to pander to her and to her followers and treat them the way they *deserve* to be treated? Yeah, right. She LOST. She lost BIG. She lost *embarrassingly*. Well, no, actually she didn't lose big. As Barry himself notes (ooopsie!), 18 million people (both men and women) voted for her in the primary, either slightly less than or slightly more than Obama, depending on how you count them. It was one of the, if not *the*, most closely contested primaries in history. Traditionally, when the losing candidate has given the winning candidate a good run for his or her money, the winner goes to considerable lengths to reach out to the loser's supporters--both because it's the right thing to do ethically, and pragmatically, because the winner needs their votes in the general. And this whole nationwide Whining In Public Campaign is even more embarrassing. Only to those consumed by Clinton Derangement Syndrome (or, on this forum, Judy Derangement Syndrome) who are also drunk on Obama-flavor Kool-Aid. (Speaking of Judy Derangement Syndrome, if I had been an Obama devotee, what are the chances that Barry would now be one of those condemning the Democratic Party for having been stupid enough to nominate Obama?) snip And she's history *because* of the same virus that has driven you all as crazy as she and her husband are. It's called The Entitlement Virus. In time, that phrase will be more widely recognized than HIV. Well, no, that's actually rather low down on the list of reasons for having supported Hillary. Because it's more dangerous. (Barry, as we all know,
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_reply@ wrote: Could someone who lives there please explain America to me? I mean, it's tough being all the way over here in Spain and trying to piece together a rational view of the media coverage of the Dem Convention so far. From over here, it's like watching Shaun Of The Dead or one of those other horror movies where a large percentage of the population has become infected with a virus that makes them go crazy. Sure, I'll be happy to explain it to you. The reason it looks like that to you is that you've got practically everything about it wrong. There are photos and film clips of protesters shouting It's still about Hill! There are news pundits saying that a third of the people who voted for her are still so pissed off about the way she was treated that they're willing to vote for a Mini-Me version of George W. Bush, complete with a gotta-impress-my-Dad fetish instead of Obama. That's six *million* people who are infected with this virus. They say the same things that we first heard on this forum, coming from one of the early carriers of the virus. Obama should have made the night he won the nomination all about Hillary. He needs to 'reach out' to Hillary supporters and show them that they are somehow 'special,' that they *deserve* 'special' treatment, as does Hill herself. In fact, of course, I didn't say either of these things, the quote marks notwithstanding. (And of course, Barry never meant to suggest any such thing.) Actually, Barry made those quotes up out of his own pointy little head. Or potty. I've heard reefers are cheap in Spain, like everything else, how else could he survive there ?
[FairfieldLife] Get hassle-free reserved seats for the Michael Beckwith events on Wednesday!!!
Get hassle-free, reserved seats for the Michael Beckwith events on Wednesday, August 27th at the Civic Center!!! These are FREE events, but you can reserve prime seats at the afternoon talk for $25 and at the evening Maharishi Award presentation entertainment for $20 ($40 for both events). 100% of the funds raised from these reserved seats will support bringing inspirational speakers to Fairfield to share their wisdom insights with the Fairfield community. Call David at (641) 233- to reserve your seats.
[FairfieldLife] Gymnastics - making it worthwhile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EO_BnsrWMnI
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Aug 25, 2008, at 3:40 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: Did you notice that Judy snipped the part about Hillary supporters acting like Bull Dykes pissed off that the little black guy knocked out their heroine without breaking a sweat? :-) If you think about it, Obama, as the much lesser-known quantity, had nowhere to go but up. Lose, and he's still young enough to try again. Hillary, OTOH, had nowhere to go but down, as the candidate so well-known her nomination seemed all but inevitable. The race really was hers to lose. And she did, spectacularly. (And no, Judy, she lost any way any rational person cares to count. Ignoring the caucuses was a serious mistake, to put it mildly.) Sal ** Hillary's loss was probably due more to social factors than anything she said or did during her campaign: WASHINGTON Men and women agree that women are more honest, intelligent, compassionate, outgoing and creative, according to a survey out Monday. But men still get a significant edge as leaders and from both sexes. The finding, in a survey commissioned by the Pew Research Center, may help to explain why Hillary Clinton isn't making an acceptance speech this week and why acceptance of women as leaders in politics and business has been slow. Among men and women whom Pew surveyed, a large majority 69 percent thought that men and women made equally strong leaders. But only 6 percent said women made better leaders while 21 percent said men did. Men and women held those views almost equally. You've got a public that on some level has a complex mix of views on this subject: admiring of women, admiring of traits that they associate with leadership, (but) not yet admiring of women in top leadership roles, said Paul Taylor, the lead author of the report and the executive vice president at the research center. http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/50619.html
[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Hope Leads POW'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Obama Leads McCain by 49% to 43% in Post-ABC Poll Nadine Elsibai Sun Aug 24, 11:53 AM ET Aug. 24 (Bloomberg) -- Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama leads Republican rival John McCain by 49 percent to 43 percent nationwide among registered voters, according to a Washington Post- ABC News poll released today. if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object(); window.yzq_d['V_f.D0wNBmY-']='U=13fk7tqc2%2fN%3dV_f.D0wNBmY-%2fC% 3d677453.12823630.13167247.1414694%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d5461244%2fV%3d1'; The results were little changed from a similar survey in mid-July, the Post said. The latest survey was conducted Aug. 19-22, before Obama announced he had chosen Senator Joe Biden of Delaware to be his vice presidential running mate. Three- quarters of registered voters, in answer to a hypothetical question, said choosing Biden wouldn't influence their vote either way, the Post reported. The poll also showed that 20 percent of those who supported Senator Hillary Clinton of New York for the Democratic presidential nomination now support Arizona Senator McCain, while 70 percent of her supporters back Obama, the highest level since she suspended her campaign in June, the Post said. The latest nationwide poll of 1,108 adults included interviews with 916 registered voters. The poll, and the results among registered voters, have a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. To contact the reporter on this story: Nadine Elsibai in Washington at [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Obama's advisors think it's a very close race that will require winning some traditionally red states: http://tinyurl.com/5vzo8o
[FairfieldLife] Cows usually align themselves north-south
http://tinyurl.com/6olv8k
[FairfieldLife] Brits behaving badly
http://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/24/world/europe/24crete.html And in Dubai, also this summer, a British man and woman who met during a drinking bout were arrested and charged with having sex on a beach, after repeatedly shouting abuse at a police officer who ordered them to stop. All of which leads to a natural question: Why? I think that in their country, they are like prisoners and they want to feel free, said Niki Pirovolaki, who works in a bakery on Malia's main street and often encounters addled Britons heading back to their hotels if they can remember where they are staying, she said. David Familton, a Briton who works in a club here, said that it was a question of emotional comfort. It's because of British culture no one can relax, so they become inebriated to be the people they want to be, he said.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Cows usually align themselves north-south
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: http://tinyurl.com/6olv8k HeHe, nice :-) One day also humans will understand the value of Vastu; today it's implemented mainly by a few visionary americans. It could take 300 years for humanity to fully acknowledge our contribution to knowledge. - Maharishi
Re: [FairfieldLife] Brits behaving badly
On Aug 25, 2008, at 5:31 PM, bob_brigante wrote: And in Dubai, also this summer, a British man and woman who met during a drinking bout were arrested and charged with having sex on a beach, after repeatedly shouting abuse at a police officer who ordered them to stop. All of which leads to a natural question: Why? I think that in their country, they are like prisoners and they want to feel free, said Niki Pirovolaki Yeah, and an Arab country in one of the most socially repressed areas of the world is just the place to do that. Bob, JOOC, where do you get these little snippets of nonsense from? Sal
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
On Aug 25, 2008, at 5:03 PM, bob_brigante wrote: WASHINGTON — Men and women agree that women are more honest, intelligent, compassionate, outgoing and creative, according to a survey out Monday. But men still get a significant edge as leaders — and from both sexes. The finding, in a survey commissioned by the Pew Research Center, may help to explain why Hillary Clinton isn't making an acceptance speech this week and why acceptance of women as leaders in politics and business has been slow. That's just an excuse the Clintonistas are floating to make her loss more palatable. Didn't stop her from becoming Senator, twice. The more people got to know her nationally, the more they didn't trust her. That's why she's not making an acceptance speech, at least in part. Sal
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Did you notice that Judy snipped the part about Hillary supporters acting like Bull Dykes pissed off that the little black guy knocked out their heroine without breaking a sweat? :-) Oh, yes! We all noticed, Barry, we took notes and posted this incredibly important information in our diaries. You see, we hang on every syllable, dotted i, and crossed t of your daily, never-ended war-of-words with Judy. Say, did Judy REALLY snip the part about Hillary and the Bull Dykes? Wow! Can we all discuss this fascinating turn of events for the next month or so, please? Judy snipped the part about the Bull Dykes! And, say, did you all notice that Barry used the emoticon again? Let's discuss the how's and wherefore's of that amazing tidbit. Get over yourself, Barry. We are all bored silly with this crap.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Entitlement Virus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's just an excuse the Clintonistas are floating to make her loss more palatable. Didn't stop her from becoming Senator, twice. Sal Did you book tickets to Scotland yet Sal ?
[FairfieldLife] on that savanaka note
I do regret my previous posting.It was shallow and distasteful and is plugged in every where on the internet.My sincere apologies and regret..Yes I do think enlightenment, evolution, transformation is a matter of grace.One can do transcendental meditation for eternity and never change or mature or evolve one bit so it seems for me..Sound direction patanjali yoga sutras and perhaps a respectable buddhist lineage of vipassana or zen. I am trading in my T.M for zazen shikantaza..No bullshit...Just sitting and just come back to this moment when I realize the mind has wandered.. Good luck to you all. alan