Actually I cared for the personal touch. Thanks.
- Original Message -
From: "Alex Stanley"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 11:28 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Alex -- didja? (Re: Fw: Post Count? - Food
Network!)
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>>
>> Alex,
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, enlightened_dawn11 wrote:
>
> fwiw, in a future lifetime, possibly two or three from this one, Vaj and the
> others on here with an antagonistic relationship to their TM experiences will
> be great proponents of the technique.
>
I'm a very big fan of poet
fwiw, in a future lifetime, possibly two or three from this one, Vaj and the
others on here with an antagonistic relationship to their TM experiences will
be great proponents of the technique.
but there is zero chance of it being this lifetime, so no point in trying to
change their minds durin
A great soul shall rest in peace. God bless him and all his good works.
This information in this email is als posted here:
http://www.palyul.org/emails/eng_news.htm
Palyul Ling International
Kyabjé Pema Norbu Rinpoche Enters Parinirvana
Kyabje Pema N
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> It's as if someone were to say baseball was a flawed
> version of cricket. Two different games.
>
LOL. O.K. Vaj, spill the beans when and where were you on TTC?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> I've learned a lot of variations on mantra concentration over the
> years, from the TM "charm causes the mind to spontaneously
> concentrate" idea to many other kinds. One of the problems I noticed
> with very "slack" techniques like TM is
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > > Unless, you have actually practiced TM, and it doesn't
> > > sound like you have, you're just pontificat
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Robert" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "yifuxero" wrote:
> >
> > ---.Good; but as Charlie Lutes once said in jest, he asks the question as a
> > challenge to those touting the benefits of "transcending" and at the same
> > time placing wh
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> sparaig wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >> Robert wrote:
> >>
> >>> It is a delicate process to transcend thought...that is the reason for
> >>> the checking, etc...
> >>> Because unless we h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine wrote:
>
> On Mar 28, 2009, at 8:47 PM, Vaj wrote:
>
> >> This is not like any other thought. The level of mantra repetition
> >> where mantra continues continuously like a spontaneous thought
> >> actually is ajapa-japa: no effort or smriti, jus
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 28, 2009, at 8:45 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> >>> At one stage you are directing the mantra. This is not like any
> >>> other thought. That was my point.
> >>>
> >
sparaig wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
>> Robert wrote:
>>
>>> It is a delicate process to transcend thought...that is the reason for the
>>> checking, etc...
>>> Because unless we have the experience of transcending thought, then we can
>>> think that r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, I am the eternal wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:52 PM, raunchydog wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, I am the eternal wrote:
> >>
> >> Vast Spy System Loots Computers in 103 Countries
> >>
> >> If computers get too powerful we'll have to
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> > Unless, you have actually practiced TM, and it doesn't
> > sound like you have, you're just pontificating about
> > something you don't know anything about. I don't know
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> Unless, you have actually practiced TM, and it doesn't
> sound like you have, you're just pontificating about
> something you don't know anything about. I don't know
> what meditation you practice, but I'd be surprised if
> you've ever ha
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
> >
> > Vaj, You haven't a clue about the practice of TM.
>
> Intersting opinion but WRONG. :-)
>
> >
> >>
> >> Really, in terms of the technical description of how TM is practiced
> >> in the initial technique--it's not truly like 'any other th
On Mar 28, 2009, at 8:47 PM, Vaj wrote:
This is not like any other thought. The level of mantra repetition
where mantra continues continuously like a spontaneous thought
actually is ajapa-japa: no effort or smriti, just constant ongoing
awareness of mantra 24/7/365.
WRONG. "When we become awa
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 28, 2009, at 7:59 PM, raunchydog wrote:
> > Vaj, You haven't a clue about the practice of TM.
>
> Intersting opinion but WRONG. :-)
No, she's quite correct. God only knows where you
came up with this stuff, but it has nothing to do
On Mar 28, 2009, at 8:45 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
At one stage you are directing the mantra. This is not like any
other thought. That was my point.
We seem to have different ideas about how things work
I know all of these adva
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 8:52 PM, raunchydog wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, I am the eternal wrote:
>>
>> Vast Spy System Loots Computers in 103 Countries
>>
>> If computers get too powerful we'll have to disarm them by organizing
>> them into a committee.
>>
>> http://www.nytimes.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, I am the eternal wrote:
>
> Vast Spy System Loots Computers in 103 Countries
>
> If computers get too powerful we'll have to disarm them by organizing
> them into a committee.
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/technology/29spy.html
> http://tinyurl.com/c
On Mar 28, 2009, at 7:59 PM, raunchydog wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
On Mar 28, 2009, at 5:24 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
This principle doesn't hold up all the way through the advanced
techniques or the defunct Chopra technique. But in any case I've
not met any
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "dhamiltony2k5" wrote:
>
> > > ..ironies. I do not think any sane person could be immune to the
> > > dichotomies involved in that.
> >
> >
> > The operative phrase here being, "any sane person." Enough said.
> >
> > BTW Van Gogh just cut off the lobe
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> > > At one stage you are directing the mantra. This is not like any other
> > > thought. That was my point.
> > >
> >
> > We seem to have different ideas about how
Vast Spy System Loots Computers in 103 Countries
If computers get too powerful we'll have to disarm them by organizing
them into a committee.
http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/29/technology/29spy.html
http://tinyurl.com/cvt3t6
By JOHN MARKOFF
Published: March 28, 2009
TORONTO — A vast electronic s
Not yet, but thanks. Yes it was fun to try out for.
We are potential one team out of thirty trying out for our city.
- Original Message -
From: "min.pige"
To:
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 9:53 AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Fw: Post Count? - Food Network!
>
>> > BTW, tomorrow I an
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan wrote:
>
> That was a fun read. However it is based on the bogus assumption that what
> defines something as a religion is the accuracy of its claims rather than the
> epistem
On Sat, Mar 28, 2009 at 4:24 PM, curtisdeltablues
wrote:
> I know all of these advanced techniques are on the web but I don't like to
> piss people off unnecessarily by being more specific. I remember how people
> into it feel about their secrets. But I hope you get my point from that.
Would y
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > At one stage you are directing the mantra. This is not like any other
> > thought. That was my point.
> >
>
> We seem to have different ideas about how things work
> > I know all of these advanced techniques are on the web but I don
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mar 28, 2009, at 5:24 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
> >
> > >>> This principle doesn't hold up all the way through the advanced
> > >>> techniques or the defunct Chopra
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> Robert wrote:
> > It is a delicate process to transcend thought...that is the reason for the
> > checking, etc...
> > Because unless we have the experience of transcending thought, then we can
> > think that repeating a mantra, or chantin
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 28, 2009, at 5:24 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>
> >>> This principle doesn't hold up all the way through the advanced
> >>> techniques or the defunct Chopra technique. But in any case I've
> >>> not met any TMer who could rightful
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 28, 2009, at 5:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:00 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
> >>
> >>> Although Maharishi promotes the idea of coming back to the ma
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> > Seems to me that MMY's "unique contribution" is the
> > understanding that thinking a mantra is no different
> > than thinking any other thought.
>
> I'm not sure you can p
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> > >
> > > > Seems to me
Fairfield Life Post Counter
===
Start Date (UTC): Sat Mar 28 00:00:00 2009
End Date (UTC): Sat Apr 04 00:00:00 2009
173 messages as of (UTC) Sun Mar 29 00:05:47 2009
27 authfriend
20 curtisdeltablues
16 TurquoiseB
14 Robert
11 raunchydog
8 "grate.swan"
7 Arhata Osho
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "yifuxero" wrote:
>
> ---.Good; but as Charlie Lutes once said in jest, he asks the question as a
> challenge to those touting the benefits of "transcending" and at the same
> time placing what they're talking about in the global context of things.
> He ask
---.Thx, Dome of the Rock (a Muslim Holy site) may be on top of the former
"Holy of Holies" (or, giving credit to divergent archaeological opinions, is
close it). In any event, the Muslims are not about to relinquish control of
their Holy site. Never happen1
Either the prophecy is (a) wrong,
> > ..ironies. I do not think any sane person could be immune to the
> > dichotomies involved in that.
>
>
> The operative phrase here being, "any sane person." Enough said.
>
> BTW Van Gogh just cut off the lobe
> > of his ear not the whole thing. Remember that.
>
> I will file that tidbi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 28, 2009, at 5:24 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>
> >>> This principle doesn't hold up all the way through the advanced
> >>> techniques or the defunct Chopra technique. But in any case I've
> >>> not met any TMer who could rightful
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> Robert wrote:
> > It is a delicate process to transcend thought...that is the reason for the
> > checking, etc...
> > Because unless we have the experience of transcending thought, then we can
> > think that repeating a mantra, or chantin
---.Good; but as Charlie Lutes once said in jest, he asks the question as a
challenge to those touting the benefits of "transcending" and at the same time
placing what they're talking about in the global context of things.
He asked [to parapharase] "by "transcending"do you mean that your
p
Robert wrote:
> It is a delicate process to transcend thought...that is the reason for the
> checking, etc...
> Because unless we have the experience of transcending thought, then we can
> think that repeating a mantra, or chanting a mantra, is going to get you
> there...but then you have missed
It is a delicate process to transcend thought...that is the reason for the
checking, etc...
Because unless we have the experience of transcending thought, then we can
think that repeating a mantra, or chanting a mantra, is going to get you
there...but then you have missed the point.
The mantra s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
> Really, in terms of the technical description of how
> TM is practiced in the initial technique--it's not
> truly like 'any other thought', as one is enjoined to
> maintain mindfulness (or smriti to use the actual
> technical term) both as the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> > Seems to me that MMY's "unique contribution" is the
> > understanding that thinking a mantra is no different
> > than thinking any other thought.
>
> I'm not sure you can p
On Mar 28, 2009, at 5:24 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
This principle doesn't hold up all the way through the advanced
techniques or the defunct Chopra technique. But in any case I've
not met any TMer who could rightfully claim the kind of exposure
to different meditaitons that would make th
On Mar 28, 2009, at 5:01 PM, sparaig wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:00 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
Although Maharishi promotes the idea of coming back to the mantra
was his unique contribution, I'm not sure a broader study of the
source docu
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Now, since I have been indulg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> Seems to me that MMY's "unique contribution" is the
> understanding that thinking a mantra is no different
> than thinking any other thought.
I'm not sure you can pick out any one specific point
as his unique contribution. It was the way h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Now, since I have been indulg
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> >
> > > Seems to me that MMY's "unique contribution" is the understanding that
> > > thinking a mantra i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
>
> > Seems to me that MMY's "unique contribution" is the understanding that
> > thinking a mantra is no different than thinking any other thought.
> >
> > Insomuch as mos
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "sparaig" wrote:
> Seems to me that MMY's "unique contribution" is the understanding that
> thinking a mantra is no different than thinking any other thought.
>
> Insomuch as most other meditation "techniques" seem to miss this point,
> I'd say it is unique
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
On Behalf Of I am the eternal
Sent: Saturday, March 28, 2009 12:56 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Kirk is vindicated on cloud computing--Rick take
note
Rick, if you're still using Mozy
htt
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard M" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm not sure the poetic descriptions of this subatomic
> > > level really effect our sens
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > Now, since I have been indulging your ques-
> > > tions, please indulge one of mine. Would you
> > > h
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj wrote:
>
>
> On Mar 28, 2009, at 12:00 PM, curtisdeltablues wrote:
>
> > Although Maharishi promotes the idea of coming back to the mantra
> > was his unique contribution, I'm not sure a broader study of the
> > source documents would support this.
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard M" wrote:
> Well I'm not sure Plato(Socrates) ever went so far as Edg's idea on
> this (a bit of Advaita?).
>
> However the idea that Plato(Socrates)'s very puzzling notion of
> "dialectic" is just a sort of down-to-earth secular rationalism does
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "elanghorus" wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog"
> wrote:
> >
> > Dude, Use/access your tool/option for Spelling/Grammar check/accuracy.
> Your readers/audience would appreciate/thank you for it/your
> consideration.
> >
>
> Than
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
>
> > I'm not sure the poetic descriptions of this subatomic
> > level really effect our sensory level in a way that
> > matters. I don't extrapolate that this is a m
If this video gives you anxiety, there's a solution!!!
If TM doesn't work, there may be an answer for TM!
http://www.cchr.org/#/videos/making-a-killing-introduction
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> sparaig wrote:
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
> >
> >> Nothing because I have learned techniques since then that work much
> >> better. TM is nothing more than "yoga lite."
> >>
> >
> > Define "work bet
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> > Maharishi often invited questions. I never had a chance
> > to ask him anything directly, but I do remember driving
> > my SCI teacher, Tom Miller, crazy with questions t
According to bible prophecy the third temple in Jerusalem must be built
before the judgment. In order for that to happen there obviously must be a time
of world peace first, especially between the Jews and the muslims. It is only
after this that the anti-christ can and will commit the abomin
As long as I'm on a nostalgia "dead musicians" music
trip tonight (my time), allow me to wax rhapsodic
about my first real hero, Richard Fariña.
I first discovered Richard in his music, recorded
with his wife, Mimi, sister of Joan Baez. I was
so blown away that I ran out and bought his novel,
"
> > "Richard M" wrote:
> * Socrates had it right: true knowledge is > knowing that you don't
know.
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>> >> But, hmmm, did Socrates mean it as you are interpreting? Or did
he >> say: >> "Knowing can happen, but the one who knows is not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu wrote:
>
> Barbara Thomas wrote:
> > Has anyone else noticed that things have not been the
> > same since the terrorist attack on September 11,
> > 2001? - - we've experienced catastrophic disasters
> > from floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and fires fro
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
>
> > Maharishi often invited questions. I never had a chance
> > to ask him anything directly, but I do remember driving
> > my SCI teacher, Tom Miller, crazy with questions t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> Maharishi often invited questions. I never had a chance
> to ask him anything directly, but I do remember driving
> my SCI teacher, Tom Miller, crazy with questions to the
> point of detecting, occasionally, a slight sputter of
> frustra
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "raunchydog" wrote:
> >
> > TM is a delicate practice of innocence. If doubt
> > festers about one's practice, a bottomless pit of
> > questions escalates anger and destroys innocence.
>
> Raunch
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> In all compassion -- really -- I think
> that Judy's stance is as old as the "con
> game" and as understandable. It's how the
> "con game" WORKS, and why it's *always*
> worked.
>
> PEOPLE WHO HAVE BEEN CONNED
> DON'T WANT TO ADMIT IT,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
> I'm not sure the poetic descriptions of this subatomic
> level really effect our sensory level in a way that
> matters. I don't extrapolate that this is a macro
> phenomenon or that the uncertainty principle really
> concludes wh
Just in case I wasn't emphatic enough in my
recommendation :-), Rolling Stone also ranked
Gram at him #87 on their list of the 100 Most
Influential Artists of All Time.
And if that's not enough, Turq ranks his version
of Roy Orbison's "Love Hurts" on that album as
one of the Top Ten Songs In Po
Can't wait to hear Leo LaPorte's show tomorrow. He's been a big
promoter of Carbonite. Since one can buy terrabyte drives in external
inclosures for around $100 just use those and do image backups. I can
do two machines on mine and still have room for incidental backups.
Just keep the driv
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I called you out on using an ad hominem argument
> > > in our last discussion
> >
Barbara Thomas wrote:
> Has anyone else noticed that things have not been the
> same since the terrorist attack on September 11,
> 2001? - - we've experienced catastrophic disasters
> from floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and fires from
> drought, etc. on a scale never known before in all of
> history
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoog
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Richard M" wrote:
Excellent, thanks! This is why I didn't continue on in philosophy! The
"problems" that philosophical theorists have with knowledge don't have much to
do with my personal epistemological approach. If you approach epistemology
including t
Absolute knowledge, absolute knowing, seems a pipe dream.
What is of some practical importance is "does it (anything) work here and now".
Lots of things work, for many purposes, but may not always work. It works until
it doesn't.
How many white swans do you need to see until you can conclude a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, grate.swan wrote:
> >
> > I was listening to Dolphin when I read your post.
> >
> > Sometimes I think about Saturday's child
> > And all about the times when we were running wild
> > I've been out s
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> wrote:
>
> > I called you out on using an ad hominem argument
> > in our last discussion
>
> It wasn't an "argument," it was an observation.
> When I first made it, you reac
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
Would you
have any objections to attendees at the up-
coming McCartney concert being handed a
flyer containing only the English translation
of the TM puja -- no commentary, only a sim-
ple explanation that this was a translation
of the cer
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> "Richard M" wrote: > * Socrates had it right: true knowledge is
> knowing that you don't know.
>
> But, hmmm, did Socrates mean it as you are interpreting? Or did he say:
> "Knowing can happen, but the one who knows is not you." That i
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote:
>
> Bob,
>
> Thanks for the link. We are now edified as to the history of Jefferson.
>
> JR
This is John's way of saying, "Ooops...I said
that Jefferson was considered the guru or rishi
of the Republican Party when in fact he was the
founde
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Arhata Osho wrote:
>
> Checks in the envelope . . where to mail it! T
To me of course, I'll make sure he gets it! I'll cash it in my bank and write
a check on my own account, then drop the check into the Ganges to follow his
ashes!
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
"Richard M" wrote: > * Socrates had it right: true knowledge is
knowing that you don't know.
But, hmmm, did Socrates mean it as you are interpreting? Or did he say:
"Knowing can happen, but the one who knows is not you." That is: "I'm
not the thinker of 'my' thoughts."
I ask, because if, say,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoog
Hmmm - could be worse!
Of course I'm not referring to Islam!
One billion souls to save - Times Online*
http://ww
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Duveyoung wrote:
>
> I almost did post "hey Kirk you're gunna go over" but Alex did
> that before I could, so there was no need for a second opinion
> as I saw it. My tough love says it's okay to warn about dog shit,
> but to take a person's right to post-and-
Bob,
Thanks for the link. We are now edified as to the history of Jefferson.
JR
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, bob_brigante wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "John" wrote:
> >
> > Jefferson is considered the guru or rishi of the Republican party.
>
>
> ***
>
> ht
http://www.youtube. com/watch? v=LoGYx35ypus
http://www.freedomofspeech.netfirms.com/
Checks in the envelope . . where to mail it!
--- In FairfieldLife@ yahoogroups. com, Arhata Osho
wrote:
>
> Outsiders have no clue what TM means let alone the infinite amount of
> meditations> available. Take a poll of 'meditators' (including Yoga people),
> and
Bush Torture Lawyers Targeted in Criminal Probe
By Scott Horton
One of America's NATO allieswhich supported the
Bush Administration's war on terror by committing
its troops to the strugglehas now opened formal
criminal inquiries looking into the Bush team's
legacy of torture. The action para
Yes.
Has anyone else noticed that things have not been the
same since the terrorist attack on September 11,
2001? - - we've experienced catastrophic disasters
from floods, tornadoes, hurricanes and fires from
drought, etc. on a scale never known before in all of
history. Not
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > --- In Fairfie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
> I called you out on using an ad hominem argument
> in our last discussion
It wasn't an "argument," it was an observation.
When I first made it, you reacted badly, so I
dropped it. Then just recently, as I noted earlier
today, you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
wrote:
> Would you care to spell out some of your understanding of the
> issues concerning science and religious distinctions? I
> would be interested.
Oh gawd. Well this subject does interest me a lot! But it's
very much a minority
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "curtisdeltablues"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > > But there's *no
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo
