[FairfieldLife] Re: Wow
I couldn't find your picture - but maybe I'll eventually figure it out. I have talked briefly to Robin here (compared to the occasional lengthy responses I get from him). IMO it was actually nice to know he was still alive and kicking, and the rumors of his demise were horribly exaggerated. And getting to hang a little here has been fun although sometimes challenging. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@... wrote: If you actually knew me you would remember my name, so you either know me or you don't know me, very likely doesn't enter into it. I was not a small player. And I, unlike you, am willing to step from behind some smokescreen, tell you my name, my history and I posted a profile picture. What you seem to be keeping alive is your interest, maybe even your obsession, with Robin Woodsworth Carlsen. He appears on FFL and you are all over it. You have written more words to and about this man than is normal for someone who is not harbouring some deep-seated, insatiable hunger to provoke and engage him. You are in denial if you can not admit this. Take two weeks, it will take you about that amount of time, to re-read all the words, words, words that you have volleyed his way. I see this as having kept something alive. This old laundry thing, now I guarantee that if I sent you one of my old WTS tapes of big juicy confrontations, manifestations and all the other goodies that are on it, you would throw it into your VHS player (if you still had such a relic) with gusto. I agree that you have virtually forgotten your experience with WTS if your descriptions of the processes i.e. confrontations are any indication. I've never been an angry person. No comment. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Jan 19, 2012, at 9:16 PM, awoelflebater wrote: Perhaps we knew each other at one time? I'd suspect that's very likely. If you are an American then for sure I would know you if you were witness to many cosmic confrontations including confronting Robin. However, when being confronted by him it was by default reciprocal. It was a two way confrontation. Like watching ping pong, back and forth, back and forth. True. I am also not quite sure of your motivation for keeping all of this alive for 25 years. Keeping all what alive? This is old laundry. Not very interesting at all. Except for voyeurs who like to watch such things as people tossing old stuff. For you to do so it must have been a very traumatic experience. I can understand that. It was not a traumatic experience for me in the least. I had a great time. But it's something virtually forgotten...and like old laundry, not worth devoting too much time to. Being asked to sort thru my old laundry for interesting pieces is what seems odd to me. If some of that old laundry involves people I cared for, I'm even less likely to hang it out to dry. You on the other hand seem happy to talk about it. And that's fine too. What I can not quite understand is the need to carry it for so long. But then your description of a confrontation on the stage sounds like someone who has either never been there, has a faulty memory or is fishing to find out if I am the real thing. Either way I am happy to answer your questions but hopefully you are wanting them answered in order to close the book on your anger. I've never been an angry person, so again, I'm not sure what you're talking about. My last experience with Robin - or Robindra as I often refer to him - was one always recalled as a moment of hilarity. It's virtually impossible for any of those present to keep from falling into laughter.
[FairfieldLife] Re: David Wants to Fly
Dear MZ: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, maskedzebra no_reply@... wrote: Dear Vajradhatu, You are convinced of the objective truth of enlightenment. I have tried to explain that while on the one hand enlightenment has an objective basis in a definitive style of functioning [as opposed to waking state functioning], it cannot be objectively true in the sense of being the way things really are. Then you would be in direct contradistinction to Buddhist enlightenment. In fact so-called Hindu enlightenment would be considered forms of suffering - and actually you do a good job of describing it as such (if one accepts that you were in a bonafide brahma-chetana in the first place). As long as your premise is: There is such a thing as enlightenment, and it represents the highest state of consciousness there can be, then it becomes simply an argument between someone who believes and knows there is a God, and someone who believes and knows there is no God. One can also believe such entities or neural-glitches such as gods do exist but that their worship, propitiation and administration only leads to suffering for the sentients that do so, and in extenso to other sentient life forms. A quick gander at world history will show the simple correctness of this view - if you have no attachment to god and son type ideals. In an even more recent view, belief in gods is a glitch from our remote past carried on by carriers of a god gene and were supported and inculcated via a malignant form of social disease known as religion. The good news is, once a gene is identified, open minded liberals could, through genetic testing, test for the god gene and simply abort the defective fetus. Over several generations we could lessen the incidence of religious disease. Social diseases such as neo-conservatism, as their genetic glitches become better known (the phenomenon is already beginning to be understood by neuroscientists) could also be eradicated over several generations. I say abort god now!. A major initiative to identify god-worshipping defects and to protect the right of abortion would do much to alleviate the suffering of a planet infected with the social disease of god-religion. More as I have time. V.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi was a manipulator.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seekliberation seekliberation@... wrote: Simple Mantra japa, though a good start, is far from knowing how to consciously withdraw to Samadhi. Most Westerners aren't ready for a Sat-Guru anyway and he probably knew that, (the demands a Sat-Guru places on a disciple aren't just *effortless*, ha, ha)! That's a good point. There were a lot of 'fairy tale' believers running around in the TMO who thought they were just going to glide right into enlightenment automatically because someone told them they will. Many of those people believed in the whole 100% effortless lifestyle that achieving enlightenment is supposed to give you. Many of those people, to include friends and family of mine, are now finding themselves in their 40's and 50's with no money, no job skills, no significant attributes to rely on, and no wealthy parents around to take care of them, and they're living a poor economy. It would be easy to blame it all on MMY, the TMO, or some of the people in the TMO elite inner circle. But i've always said that if you walk down a rough neighborhood dressed nicely with money in your wallet, it's going to get taken every time. You can curse the thug who took it, but you're the idiot who kept walking down the same street. I guess the conclusion they should be reaching (or should have reached years ago) is that 100% effortless lifestyle is bullshit. Sometimes simple mantra japa, is just simple mantra japa. Where your argument falls apart is that TM digs were made to look like palaces and the leader and his cronies did not look they were living in a rough neighborhood. Dressed in the finest silks, many insiders were quite wealthy (or at least tried to dress the part) and lived opulent lifestyles, it wasn't at all like your imaginary rough neighborhood. Unless you live in a ghetto where the books and the furniture are gold-gilt. ;-) The sattvic upside: bullshit is 100% organic when the right ingredients are ingested. But it's still inedible.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi was a manipulator.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seekliberation seekliberation@... wrote: That brings up another good point. When I was a student at MIU/MUM I remember a lot of anxiety going around regarding whether or not someone would attain enlightenment in this lifetime. Later in life, while studying Vedic teachings from someone else, I was exposed to the concept of Vaikuntha. Vaikuntha was supposed to be the Hindu equivelant of 'Heaven', and sometimes 'enlightenment'. According to the author, Vaikuntha directly translates as 'No Anxiety'. So essentially, 'enlightenment' and 'heaven' is the same thing as 'No Anxiety'. Yet it seemed to me that there was a lot of anxiety running around the TMO regarding whether or not we were doing enough for enlightenment, world peace, meditating enough, etc In other words, we were putting ourselves in a state of anxiety in order to achieve a state of no anxiety. seekliberation Good points! Why do you think they (the pundits, Bevan, etc.) kept chanting Maharishi is in heaven, Maharishi is in heaven when he had died? Because they believe incarnation into a heaven-dimension is a prerequisite for full awakening. Better luck next time!
[FairfieldLife] Re: iPad Mellotron, etc. simulator
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: On 01/27/2011 06:13 AM, Vaj wrote: Mellotron, Drum, Guitar, Bass, etc. played on iPad and IPhone playing In the Court of the Crimson King. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4lJW-SWhKI LINK This song may contain tamasic elements. - CPPT Ever play a Mellotron? We had one for a while at the music store where I worked after returning from TTC in the 1970s. Funky machine. I think my Mixcraft installation even has it as a virtual instrument. Yeah, I have. They were very high maintenance and constantly prone to breakdown. I got a set of all the sounds in 24 bit format (free on the web), recorded in a studio and made them into virtual instruments for Garageband, then I can trigger them with a keyboard or a guitar synth. The original company has now actually licensed an official app version for the iPad. But IMO it's just too small for a person with normal or large hands. It would be perfect for Hobbits though. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Dharana (concentration) beautifully explained!
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wgm4u@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote: Here is how I interpret this No-self experience: The so-called states of TC, CC, GC, and UC describe an ever-closer approach between Purusha and Prakriti, or the Absolute and the Relative, or Father Spirit and Mother Matter. Kundalini, both from below and from above, acts as a kind of more-or-less constant conductor or tunneler to effect their approach and eventual marriage. Using a Cosmic Body as a map of their progress, we can posit that Transcendental Consciousness (TC) activates the Crown Chakra (Shiva; Purusha) and the Foot Chakra (Shakti; Prakriti); Cosmic Consciousness (CC) moves down into the Brow (Witness) and up into the Base (Organs of action; Physical plane) to effect a witnessing of activity; God-Consciousness (GC) moves down into the Throat (Space; bliss) and up into the Sex (Senses; Astral-emotional) to structure blissful senses and subtle-body experiences; and Unity Consciousness (UC) moves down into the Heart (Buddhic intuition; finest feeling) and up into the Navel (Manas or animal mind) to move beyond the senses into an intuitive grasp of One-ness. Actually I think it's a little different in Classical Yoga, when the Serpent Fire reaches the 6th Chakra that is Self-Realization or what MMY calls CC, when it further reaches the 7th that is what MMY calls Unity or what classical Yoga calls CC. Different terms for the same thing, try not to let it confuse you. Actually basic forms of samadhi begin in the upper ajna. Then one goes through a series of novel samadhic experiences. CC or turiyatita is associated with consciousness stabilizing at a certain point above the crown of the head. It's really only in this realm that one begins to transcend the outer (physical form) of the breath and taps into the inner breath.
[FairfieldLife] Re: What to expect at Art of Silence?
Sounds like a great time, please keep us posted! I'm sure there are a number of people who could share stories and I hope they do so here. The nice thing about having a lineage is 'there's always more than one person you can hang with.' We have the popular SSRS ashram nearby in Montreal, and we were going to check it out but we opted to check out Gampo Abbey in Cape Breton instead, and weren't disappointed (even though Pema Chodron was not in residence at the time).
[FairfieldLife] Re: Desperation to fill the Domes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.p...@... wrote: I am not sold on SSRS. But I do like his Art of Living kriya and the breezy style exuded by the teachers of SSRS I've met. Sometimes the burgers are better on the other side of the fence.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Desperation to fill the Domes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.p...@... wrote: On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:57 AM, vajradhatu108 no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@ wrote: I am not sold on SSRS. But I do like his Art of Living kriya and the breezy style exuded by the teachers of SSRS I've met. Sometimes the burgers are better on the other side of the fence. Erma Bombeck said it best in the title of her book *The Grass is Always Greener Over the Septic Tank*. I am finding each day that the Art of Living kriya is taking the doom and gloom out of my TM/TMSP. I go into my program now full of light and experience that light throughout my TM/TMSP program. I remember, soon after becoming a sidha, taking a week long WPA at H. St. NW. A more experienced sidha despaired of his chronic insomnia. Others chimed in. I couldn't understand how something as wonderful as the TMSP could allow this sort of suffering to creep in. Over the years people tried marmalade, vastu and basti, all to no avail. I saw the sidhas around me becoming depressed, nearly falling over from lack of sleep, becoming unglued. It's very clear to me, having been on CCP for a very long time when it got down to just Bobby Kennedy and myself, then on IA a decade later, that there's something wrong with the TM/TMSP. It's unbalanced, as, I suspect, was it's spiritual leader. Me, I'm happy as a clam right now and could happily leave this group were it not for the very vigorous conversations that have taken place here in the last month or two revealing the good, the bad and the ugly side of Maharishi, the TMO and MMY's teachings. IMO something very important was missing from the TM/TMSP practice (balance, perhaps?). I've gotten it back, alas, and I'm happy for that. But I no longer need his departed Holiness, his Dome, his bogus 1%, square root of 1% numbers and his organization, or what's becoming at least three organizations, one in Vlodrup, one in Paris and one in India. Well it's great to hear how it worked for you.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Desperation to fill the Domes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony...@... wrote: Oh,he'd pssibly go back if asked real nice to meditate and do the TMSP in a large group meditation. They could just ask and trust people that way too. If their interest is in facilitating large group meditations. Given the situation here, they just ain't going to get the numbers they want without giving up some of their position. They are really down to just some hundreds of folks to draw on the way they have it excluded. Is pitiable, its been done so badly. Well could they actually do it without going against the direct wishes and injunctions of their founder? After all, it's he they represent. If they fudge that, it's no longer adherening to the teachings of the Maharishi.
[FairfieldLife] Shukra: Critique of Art of Living/Kriya course
Weren't you the guy who claimed SSRS took you to a nadi-style jyotish reader and he shewed you the nadi-leaves which stated that Maharishi Mahesh Yogi was one-sixteenth of an avatar? If so, you should alert Rick, as the person that previously some believed that could verify it (Prof. D.S.) is going back to India. Now would be an interesting time to verify this claim you shared here previously. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 shukr...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@ wrote: When I looked at the schedule for the course, I didn't realize that it was just more than Friday evening. It was also all day Saturday and all day Sunday. I couldn't figure out why a course would take that long. To my regret, I found out why. It's full of a bunch of Vedic homilies an 8 y/o would scoff at and a lot of New Age exercises which should have died in the 1960s at the Esalen Institute. One thing for certain, teacher training must be something very different from TTC, because if TM is considered Yoga Lite, then the Art of Living must be Yoga made with aspartame. The two long kriyas we practiced were extremely powerful. Regrettably, the first long kriya, on Saturday, kicked in my flying sutra SAME BUT GAVE ME TOTAL INSOMNIA LATE and those asana mats aren't anywhere near as soothing as the foam in the golden domes. The follow up is very casual and very helpful. As opposed to the TMO where everybody's shit is supposed to smell like roses, the Art of Living people all practice and teach forgiveness, acceptance of themselves and others, and cherishing of diversity. A very welcome relief. The take home kriya is extremely powerful. I do it before I commence my morning TM/TMSP. I am filled throughout the day with prana. A very nice, soothing and energizing feeling. The prana helps a lot in the TM/TMSP practice. There are 2 free long kriyas offered at my AOL center a week. One is allowed to take only one of these a week, as they have so very much power. I will be attending these long kriyas. This stuff's powerful. It's difficult to get used to SSRS after decades of listening to Maharishi go into intricate detail. I'm not at all sure if I will partake of the knowledge parts nor if I will take the Art of Silence (extended, in residence guided meditations). Time will tell.
[FairfieldLife] Epilogue: Prairie Peace Park is facing its end
Nature supports and nature taketh away... http://journalstar.com/special-section/epilogue/article_2d4b8d0e-aecf-11df-8bd3-001cc4c03286.html The Prairie Peace Park opened in 1994. Interstate 80 travelers often dropped in to view the unique, peace-oriented artwork and exhibits. Annual visitation averaged about 600. Faced with financial problems, the Prairie Peace Park Board sold the park in 2005 to a transcendental meditation group based in Fairfield, Iowa. PLEASANT DALE -- The Prairie Peace Park has fallen on hard times. Old tires and shattered glass and an empty Jim Beam bottle litter the entrance. Weeds grow in the cracks of the parking lot, which is scattered with asphalt shingles and debris from an abandoned house nearby. There are no welcome banners to greet visitors -- only a big for sale sign and a colorful mural on the side of the house, featuring flowers, sun, people, music symbols and a globe supported by hands. It wasn't always this way. The Prairie Peace Park once was a place where the seeds of peace were sown by a group of visionaries who wanted a venue where people could meditate about ways to change a violent world. The park opened June 11, 1994. More than 1,500 people attended, including actor Ed Asner, children's singer Raffi and the late U.S. Sen. J.J. Exon. Sixteen years later, the park is about to be sold, its mission of fostering world peace lost in 27 acres of weeds and trees and neglected sculptures and exhibits. Marc Snow with NAI FMA Realty in Lincoln has been working with a buyer interested in the land and has a contract under review. Don Tilley, president of the Prairie Peace Park Board, was not surprised by the news. We were expecting it to happen, he said. Tilley, one of the park's founders, had high hopes its peace mission would live on after the board sold it in 2005 to Global Country World Peace, based in Maharishi Vedic City, Iowa. The group, affiliated with Maharishi University of Management in Fairfield, Iowa, planned to build a 12,000-square-foot peace palace on site to teach transcendental meditation and host public lectures. We always had some hope, Tilley said. When they tried to sell the property, we kind of guessed it (the peace palace) wasn't going to happen. (...)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Desperation to fill the Domes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wg...@... wrote: What a goofy program to begin with..NONE of them, I repeat NONE of them are functioning from the home of all the laws of nature, (OK,maybe a wee faint awareness, when they're not sleeping). What a disaster this whole program has been to the entire TM effort!! but then, maybe it's instructive as to who MMY really was to begin with..(hint, a Hindu reformer). If you think aging sexually perverse renunciates intoxicated with wealth and self-image can be reformers? What's he reforming?, the RIg Ved? Give me a frickin' break!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Desperation to fill the Domes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.p...@... wrote: Perhaps Jungian synchronicity, perhaps the Sport of Nature Maharishi always talked about. I only took 10 years to decide to take the Art of Living/Kriya course. The talk here about was Maharishi a petty, hateful guy, the kriya, meeting teachers of another guru who are natural. SSRS stresses naturalness, forgivingness, helpfulness. I at first looked down on my friends who were still going to IA (on my support, airfare, transportation, and so on). Now I just let them be. Let the Dome be. I will do my program, aided by the kriya I do before morning program. Let those who run MUM, the TMO and Dome policy go tither and commit fornication upon thineselves. Gawd I always find it entertaining when a TM cult fanatic leaves and just jumps into another corporate guru's org. I guess if you're crazy about McDonald's and get some bad burgers it's only natural for you to go to Burger King or White Castle.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra...@... wrote: What is it with you vaj. You didn't at all deal with the point I was making. Just because Maharishi was not an expert or even a practitoner of hatha yoga does not mean he was not a yogi. And by the way, in a post you made to me in response to a comment I made several months ago, you specifically said that Maharishi poisoned his guru. You can say whatever you want now, but thats what you said to me some months back. Actually Mahesh was a *leading suspect* in the poisoning of Swami Brahmananda, that doesn't necessarily mean *he actually did it*. What it says to me is the even back then, among contemporaries, he wasn't held in the highest esteem.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote: On Jul 8, 2010, at 7:47 PM, vajradhatu108 wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra108@ wrote: Hey Vaj, Most of the real yogi's that I met in India, never practiced asanas. You should know that yoga means so much than asana. So if Maharishi had someone else who was an expert in that areadesign the course, it just shows that he didn't claim to be a know it all. And it has nothing to do with whether he was a yogi or not Or, of course, maybe he just added the yogi as his own alias? Or maybe he really meant Yogi Bear? But he was talking too fast, and the last name just got dropped off somehow. We'll never know. Hmmm.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay/Judith Bourque
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifux...@... wrote: right...this is the Internet, not a Dan Brown conspiratorial group. Just come right out and state your agenda, no problem. People would applaud you (Vaj) first, first for doing that; then reserving the choice to blast the actual content of what agenda you are pushing at a later date. Let's hear it. There is no agenda, there's only the (to me) obvious fact that Mahesh fooled a lot of us. You see it's not really about ME. So now we know he was not a Brahmachari, a monk, a life-long celibate. He not only lied, he tried to convince others the abstain from sex, encouraged cold showers, testicular ice wraps, the married to stop having sexual intimacy, etc. So the question naturally arises, if you're not in deep denial, how much else is untrue? I'm placing my bets on rishi and yogi. YMMV. It was a pretty good act while it lasted.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra108@ wrote: If you haven't noticed, Vaj has the constant need to be right on his opinions. For some reason, he thinks he is an expert about Indian and Vedic knowledge, even though he clearly isn't. Don't know why he has to feel he is more knowledgeable than so many of us. How come Vaj? There just ain't no body that can talk the talk like Vaj. Between Veda, advaiata, neo advaita, post advaita, 2nd degree this, fourth degree that. Vaj is a lettered man when it comes to discussing these things. Iguess letters and pedigree, and titles rule in Vaj's spiritual universe. He wants some fruit salad on that dhoti. Actually I don't support the idea of taking on spiritual titles. But if you do, they should have some substance behind them! Apparently there is no substance behind Ole Mahesh's assumed titles. I think historically the important thing in that he fooled the Beatles. Then he was able to ride on their fame and seem believable. And he had a really good schtick and excellent business sense.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote: vajradhatu108 no_reply@ wrote: Mastery of yoga isn't dependent on literacy. Having said that, I was never a fan of Vivekananda and the other vaishnava-protestant Hindu supremacists expounding their mythical Vedism. Yuck. Sounds like you've got it pretty well worked out Vaj. That's neat. Got all the place settings in proper order. I'm always interested in the perspective from someone who has arrived. Sounds as if you like judging me because I said something you didn't like. I guess that's too bad. Find another scapegoat for your own denial. It's not my fault you were not able to discriminate very well. The only question I might have is, why, when you stepped upon a different, apparantly better path, are you so interested in the path you've left. Like, I have a girlfriend I was very close with many years ago, but it didn't work out, and I've moved on. Yet I don't find myself spending a lot of time going over the details of that old relationship. It's that living in the present type thing where I choose to be. On the other hand, maybe the present isn't as interesting as that older time. I'm commenting on the recent findings RE: Judith Bourque's book, and appendant issues. Of course if somebody brings up a topic from the past, that was not known before esp., it's natural to comment on it. Given that many people have some deep denial on the issues surrounding Mahesh, it's not surprising that people need to find someone to attack. I can tell this is probably difficult for you to process. It seems ex-TM teachers and ex-TM teachers who remained involved in neohinduism or neovedism will have the most difficult time.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Prediction
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote: I'm heading over to Batgap. The question I have is, will there be any discussion of The Book I say no. I think they generally avoid unpleasant topics. Well, here I go folks. If you don't hear back from you in a few days, come in after me. Enjoy the sattva.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra108@ wrote: Its true. And somehow he thinks he knows everything about Maharishi's time with Guru Dev and is an expert in that area also. He appears to really believe that all Maharishi was during that time was a glorified clerk running errands. NOT to get into the Bash the Maharishi critic rather than deal with the issue fest or anything, but I believe this, too, *based on Maharishi's own accounts*. In my experience he never claimed anything else. Anything else was invented IMO by hanger-ons who were trying to invent justifications for putting MMY up on a pedestal. While it's true that Vaj has a thing for being right, it IS good to remember that only one of the three names in Maharishi Mahesh Yogi is deserved; the rest were invented, to better market to the West, where they have neither the criteria for telling whether a spiritual title is deserved or not, nor the desire to find out. This is all about Protect the importance of the guy I hung out with for so long so that I can cling to *my* importance in having gotten to hang with him IMO. I'd have more respect for the TM crowd *or* those who want to preserve their good feelings about MMY if they just did what Joe suggested -- read the friggin' book and then discuss it rationally, with- out trying to diss the writer or those who believe her vs. the TMO version. My only point so far in all of this is that the *immediate* reaction of some is to try to diss the writer; the *immediate* reaction of others is to try to diss those who believe her. Exactly. And Mahesh looks like the only title left standing. What I'm noticing, besides the obvious denial of the TM fans, is that it is not obvious to them that once the farce of being a monk fails, there are certain other things that either naturally come into question or themselves fall by the wayside as his blatant lack of integrity is revealed. It's interesting because despite all the talk about maya in TM-circles, it shows that there is no way to be effortlessly free of our own delusions. In fact deciding to be some part of any 'spiritual group' almost seems to insure that you'll embrace some of their delusions in the process.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra...@... wrote: News to me. Well if you don't believe it, why did you say that Mahrishi poisoned his Guru in a resonse to something I said months ago on this forum. Randyanand, could you please point me to that post so I'm clear what exactly you are referring to? Thanks.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 fest...@... wrote: And yet he changed so many people's lives for the better -- indeed, rescued many lives, mine included. He figured out a way of reaching me, a confused 17-year-old high school drop out, and giving me something that permanently turned my life around. I guess all the more qualified yogis were sitting around in India being very learned and doing whatever it is that real yogis do. Maharishi, on the other hand, actually decided to make a difference in real people's lives all across the world. Great seer? You bet. And of course let's be open and not forget the negative things that happened as well, the lives that changed for the worse: people committed suicide, experienced psychosis, some donated and lost their family fortunes, became neoadvaitin egomaniacs, etc. Was it more with TM than any other technique? That's hard to say, but I can't think of a worse example really, can you? I think it's important to see the big picture.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay/Judith Bourque
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Joe geezerfr...@... wrote: Judith Bourques own affair with MMY started in Rishikesh in 1970 and continued on until it tapered off in Seelisberg when it was clear that MMY's interest was drifting away towards several other women. So what's that, a ten year span? Was he any good in bed? Cut or uncut?
[FairfieldLife] Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_re...@... wrote: In my understanding, a yogii/yoginii can do just about anything without collecting kriyamaaNa-karma, or whatever. Heck, even kill their relatives! **karmaashuklaakRSnaM** yoginaH... (YS IV 7). Of course if you believe this, the person in question would have to be an *actual* yogi, not a YINO. A Shankaracharya who knew Mahesh has stated that he never knew or studied yoga. Indeed his yoga asana course was designed by someone else! A close examination of his teachings also reveals no signs that he was trained as a yogi.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote: In my understanding, a yogii/yoginii can do just about anything without collecting kriyamaaNa-karma, or whatever... Vaj: Of course if you believe this, the person in question would have to be an *actual* yogi, not a YINO. Apparently the Mahesh Yogi was doing exactly what a tantric yogi is supposed to be doing. But, what is an *actual* yogi? Was your guru the 'Swami Rama of the Himalayas' and *actual* yogi? LOL! Not, my guru was not Swami Rama. A Shankaracharya who knew Mahesh has stated that he never knew or studied yoga. According to the Shankaracharya of Jyotirmath, Mr. Varma was a 'yogi' who was trained by a self-realized master - Swami Brahmanand Saraswati, who was considered to be a 'Maha Yogi'. Actually there's no evidence that Mahesh received any special teaching from Brahmananda beyond his public teachings. It should be noted that the Shankaracharya mentioned by Vaj has been arrested and charged with premeditated murder, so Vaj's sources can't be trusted to tell the truth. Not that I'm aware of. It should be noted that Willy apparently owns a Red Herring business. A close examination of his teachings also reveals no signs that he was trained as a yogi. So, you're saying that spending thirteen years at the feet of Yoga Master doesn't count as training to be a 'Yogi'? Go figure. No, I'm saying spending 13 years at a desk or running errands doesn't count as training as a yogi. This ain't Texas, home schooling doesn't count.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote: So, you're thinking there is a 'special teaching' involved in being a 'yogi'? What secret teaching would that be? No, I was not thinking that. It should be noted that the Shankaracharya mentioned by Vaj has been arrested and charged with premeditated murder, so Vaj's sources can't be trusted to tell the truth. Not that I'm aware of. Why didn't you tell us that the Shankaracharya is in jail accused of murder? The news was all over the Indian press. It should be noted that Willy apparently owns a Red Herring business. You brought up the Shankaracharya as an information source, not me. As it is, you're looking like you're a dishonest informant to say the least. It's not new information, Karpinski's interview has been around a long time Willy. And there's a new movie you can check out called David Wants to Fly which explains that Mahesh was never actually authorized to teach at all. Go figure, huh. It's really not that much of a surprise that he also lied about being a life long celibate, a monk. I wonder if Larry King will have Judith on? A close examination of his teachings also reveals no signs that he was trained as a yogi. So, you're saying that spending thirteen years at the feet of Yoga Master doesn't count as training to be a 'Yogi'? Go figure. No, I'm saying spending 13 years at a desk or running errands doesn't count as training as a yogi. So, you're saying that anyone who runs errands or sits at a desk at a yoga camp can't be a yogi? You're not making any sense. This ain't Texas, home schooling doesn't count. But, you got your yoga training in Maine, right? Wrong.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra...@... wrote: Which Shankaracharya was that? Sri Swami Swarupananda, Jagadguru of Jyotir Math. Typically yogis don't hide where they learned and trained in yoga-darshana. If they're hiding where they acquired that knowledge or who their teacher was, it often means they're trying to hide something about their past or simply being untruthful. There is a long-standing rumor by an old TMO insider that Mahesh actually did train in Buddhist chandali-yoga (Tib. gTummo), in which case he would have to have received the third and fourth initiations of inner- and nondual-tantra, which the fourth initiation does authorize one as a yogi. It could also explain why he kept it secret since he represented himself as coming from the tradition of advaita-vedanta a la Shankara, not tantric Buddhism. But that is just a rumor and IMO, highly unlikely. Since Swarupananda is far more privy to such inside information, I'll defer to his opinion.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote: Which Shankaracharya was that? Vaj: Typically yogis don't hide where they learned and trained in yoga-darshana. So, why not just tell us your real name and when and where you were trained to be a yogi? Kind of a moot point because I don't use the title yogi after my name! Of course if I did teach or used a title in teaching, I would, like my teachers, share who my teachers were with my students, when I met the various teachers (and how) and what initiations I'd received, etc. (Hopefully this will go thru. For some reason my post on Mahesh's alleged tantric initiations didn't go thru to the list or my other posts.)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote: So, why not just tell us your real name and when and where you were trained to be a yogi? Vaj: Kind of a moot point because I don't use the title yogi after my name! So, you've got no title, and you've received no special training, but you are telling us what a yogi is supposed to be? Of course, I've never said that. Thanks for demonstrating the relationship between Texas textbooks and reading comprehension! Do you mind if I cross-post your posts the Huffington Post? Thanks.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay/Judith Bourque
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Joe geezerfr...@... wrote: This is why further conversation about this is a bit useless until you read the book. After a few more people (including you) read this we can start to have some potentially VERY interesting discussions. Until I either find the book in the bargain bin or the Cliff notes version is available for about 5 USD, I ain't spending 40 bucks to find out what I already knew in the 80's. Would you consider outlining the text and merely quoting the most lurid details? We'd really appreciate it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote: vajradhatu108 no_reply@ wrote: A Shankaracharya who knew Mahesh has stated that he never knew or studied yoga. Indeed his yoga asana course was designed by someone else! A close examination of his teachings also reveals no signs that he was trained as a yogi. So his asana course was designed by someone else. Like so what. Did he claim to be an expert in yoga. Steevo! Next time ya get a chance, check out the last four letters in the Big Reesh's assumed name. I know, I know. You probably missed it. Or you may be from Texas. But usually people who put the four letters Y-O-G-I after their names know a little bit about yoga. Just sayin'. ;-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vajradhatu108 no_reply@ wrote: No, I'm saying spending 13 years at a desk or running errands doesn't count as training as a yogi. This ain't Texas, home schooling doesn't count. This is funny. Ramakrishna was illiterate, or nearly so. Yet he attracted Vivekenanda. Go figure that. Guess Ramakrishna was just a goofball in Vaj's book. Didn't have the Yogi imprimiteur, wherever you get that. Maybe from the Wizard of Oz. He pulls it out his bag. Mastery of yoga isn't dependent on literacy. Having said that, I was never a fan of Vivekananda and the other vaishnava-protestant Hindu supremacists expounding their mythical Vedism. Yuck.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra...@... wrote: And he also believes Maharishi poisoned Guru Dev and there is no evidence of this either. Is that what I believe? News to me.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra...@... wrote: Hey Vaj, Most of the real yogi's that I met in India, never practiced asanas. You should know that yoga means so much than asana. So if Maharishi had someone else who was an expert in that areadesign the course, it just shows that he didn't claim to be a know it all. And it has nothing to do with whether he was a yogi or not Or, of course, maybe he just added the yogi as his own alias?
[FairfieldLife] Re: Snow Leopard arrives
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote: From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Vaj Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 1:49 PM To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Subject: [FairfieldLife] Snow Leopard arrives Just installed in 20 minutes. It's true, I actually have 7 gigs of extra space. It's like having a new computer. It's actually a faster OS than the previous version imagine that. http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/27/technology/personaltech/ 27pogue.html?_r=1emc=eta1 Did it arrive by mail or UPS? We ordered it, but the mail already came and no Snow Leopard. They sent it overnight Fed Ex. If you weren't there when they knocked, you might have missed it. i had to print out and place on my front door a document, with my signature and permission to just leave it. Of course i had to also sign and consent in case some hooligan--presumably a raccoon or a bear sensing food might abscond with my precious package sigh. Both my wife and I weren't home and we knew that would likely be the case--Fed Ex are sticklers on computer items for either a live signature or the simple letter on the door (I'd typically sign an 8.5 x 11 piece of paper with my message scrawled in Sharpie). Anyhow, they were kind and left it, nicely placed in our mudroom. I'm certain the Jack Russell's probably lunged at the poor delivery guy on the glass windows, although who just can't laugh at Jack Russell's lunging at anything? If said package has not arrived and you ordered it or have an account with apple.com, you can track it simply by signing on and going to the store and then checking order status. Order status has a live-link to Fed Ex, which will give you all details. i knew i had it, before i left where I was logged on!
[FairfieldLife] Re: The 5 Stages of Fascism
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nelsonriddle2001 nelsonriddle2...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Aug 28, 2009, at 9:06 AM, WillyTex wrote: Vaj wrote: Worried about the gun nuts... Well, I always thought the 'Brown-shirts' were the ones wanting to take AWAY the weapons owned by the people. In order to do that in the U.S.A., you'd have to repeal the Second Amendment. The last thing the Gestapo would want is for the people to have a well regulated and armed militia. So, if you're wanting to take away my civil rights, then that's probably illegal in the U.S.A. Nelson wrote: I believe the first and second amenndment are both under attack. So, the 'Brown-shirts' are attacking the U.S. Constitution. They think that American citizens who support the Constitution are 'gun nuts'. So, the 'Brown-shirts' call the Americans who support the Second Amendment 'Brown-shirts', but the real 'Brown-shirts' are the liberals who want to take away our civil rights. So, you're saying that the fascists are attacking in '5 stages' and this is the first stage, calling us 'gun nuts'? No, no, no. The Brownshirts are the right-wing extremists who are threatening our Democracy by showing up bearing arms at town meetings Willy. These are meetings for talking, not shooting. So what we need to do is take away the guns of right-wing extremists and dangerous militia groups. Everyone else would get to keep theirs. It might just be easier to chip them. You already have a legal militia in Texas called the Texas National Guard. Don't spit in their faces by going vigilante on them! No one wants another Waco Willy or another McVeigh or another Columbine or another Virginia Tech or another Pittsburgh cop killer or another George Tiller killer or insert next nut. There was a famous painting many people have on their walls in the northern US by an artist named Norman Rockwell of what a town hall meeting is supposed to look like. There are no guns in that picture and everyone's free to speak their mind. There are no Brownshirts in that picture Willy. And that's the way us Yankees would like to keep it. We like to feel free to speak our minds. We don't need no Teabagging Brownshirts around. And you're supposed to read the article before you respond to it WIlly! It looks to me like this picture is sort of inside out--the right wing extremest and malitia groups were what saved the country back when. They were the patriots of their day. Older Yankee
[FairfieldLife] Re: The 5 Stages of Fascism
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nelsonriddle2001 nelsonriddle2...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Aug 28, 2009, at 9:06 AM, WillyTex wrote: Vaj wrote: Worried about the gun nuts... Well, I always thought the 'Brown-shirts' were the ones wanting to take AWAY the weapons owned by the people. In order to do that in the U.S.A., you'd have to repeal the Second Amendment. The last thing the Gestapo would want is for the people to have a well regulated and armed militia. So, if you're wanting to take away my civil rights, then that's probably illegal in the U.S.A. Nelson wrote: I believe the first and second amenndment are both under attack. So, the 'Brown-shirts' are attacking the U.S. Constitution. They think that American citizens who support the Constitution are 'gun nuts'. So, the 'Brown-shirts' call the Americans who support the Second Amendment 'Brown-shirts', but the real 'Brown-shirts' are the liberals who want to take away our civil rights. So, you're saying that the fascists are attacking in '5 stages' and this is the first stage, calling us 'gun nuts'? No, no, no. The Brownshirts are the right-wing extremists who are threatening our Democracy by showing up bearing arms at town meetings Willy. These are meetings for talking, not shooting. So what we need to do is take away the guns of right-wing extremists and dangerous militia groups. Everyone else would get to keep theirs. It might just be easier to chip them. You already have a legal militia in Texas called the Texas National Guard. Don't spit in their faces by going vigilante on them! No one wants another Waco Willy or another McVeigh or another Columbine or another Virginia Tech or another Pittsburgh cop killer or another George Tiller killer or insert next nut. There was a famous painting many people have on their walls in the northern US by an artist named Norman Rockwell of what a town hall meeting is supposed to look like. There are no guns in that picture and everyone's free to speak their mind. There are no Brownshirts in that picture Willy. And that's the way us Yankees would like to keep it. We like to feel free to speak our minds. We don't need no Teabagging Brownshirts around. And you're supposed to read the article before you respond to it WIlly! It looks to me like this picture is sort of inside out--the right wing extremest and malitia groups were what saved the country back when. They were the patriots of their day. Older Yankee
[FairfieldLife] Re: The 5 Stages of Fascism
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nelsonriddle2001 nelsonriddle2...@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Aug 28, 2009, at 9:06 AM, WillyTex wrote: Vaj wrote: Worried about the gun nuts... Well, I always thought the 'Brown-shirts' were the ones wanting to take AWAY the weapons owned by the people. In order to do that in the U.S.A., you'd have to repeal the Second Amendment. The last thing the Gestapo would want is for the people to have a well regulated and armed militia. So, if you're wanting to take away my civil rights, then that's probably illegal in the U.S.A. Nelson wrote: I believe the first and second amenndment are both under attack. So, the 'Brown-shirts' are attacking the U.S. Constitution. They think that American citizens who support the Constitution are 'gun nuts'. So, the 'Brown-shirts' call the Americans who support the Second Amendment 'Brown-shirts', but the real 'Brown-shirts' are the liberals who want to take away our civil rights. So, you're saying that the fascists are attacking in '5 stages' and this is the first stage, calling us 'gun nuts'? No, no, no. The Brownshirts are the right-wing extremists who are threatening our Democracy by showing up bearing arms at town meetings Willy. These are meetings for talking, not shooting. So what we need to do is take away the guns of right-wing extremists and dangerous militia groups. Everyone else would get to keep theirs. It might just be easier to chip them. You already have a legal militia in Texas called the Texas National Guard. Don't spit in their faces by going vigilante on them! No one wants another Waco Willy or another McVeigh or another Columbine or another Virginia Tech or another Pittsburgh cop killer or another George Tiller killer or insert next nut. There was a famous painting many people have on their walls in the northern US by an artist named Norman Rockwell of what a town hall meeting is supposed to look like. There are no guns in that picture and everyone's free to speak their mind. There are no Brownshirts in that picture Willy. And that's the way us Yankees would like to keep it. We like to feel free to speak our minds. We don't need no Teabagging Brownshirts around. And you're supposed to read the article before you respond to it WIlly! It looks to me like this picture is sort of inside out--the right wing extremest and malitia groups were what saved the country back when. They were the patriots of their day. Older Yankee It only appears that way if you don't realize how the Republican party has morphed over time. It's no longer any sort of real, honest republican party! In fact it could be argued that our current party system is no true two-party system, only a two-party system by name. In actuality they're one and the same in effect. It also helps to point out that founding fathers were in no way way remotely connected with the words Republican party and the current party of the same name. They're two different entities entirely. Nor are they the Federalists they imagine themselves as. If the founding fathers (my ancestors) saw the Republicans of today, they would either be planning a way to destroy them or (at best) deport them.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Anapanasati Meditation
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq jr_...@... wrote: To All: This meditation technique works. It's very powerful. Please, see the link below: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk8LyM1Io4Afeature=related My Patanjali guru, who was from a Rig Vedic pundit family, also said the same thing. He claimed that it was the fastest way to bring awareness into the avadhuti or sushumna--primordial awareness, our natural state, mahamudra--whatever you want to call it--anapanasati, vipassana or whatever. I've heard some people claim it's the universal technique because you find it in Vedanta, Christianity--all religions in some form. I don't know if I believe that...but it is interesting.
[FairfieldLife] Re: A Song Dedication for Pope Ratzinger
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: On Apr 21, 2008, at 4:28 PM, TurquoiseB wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: I'd like to dedicate this song video to Pope Ratzinger on his first visit to America. http://home.earthlink.net/~vajranatha/Joni_Mitchell.html I'd like to follow up on this, if I might. I think that this is a remarkable video, and an interesting moment captured. Equally remarkable, add racism and sexism though: http://home.earthlink.net/~vajranatha/2 I am a descendent of William Penn's favorite Indian translator (and the favorite and most trusted of the natives). So I grew up in natural awe of the natives of Pennsylvania, their sacred sites and lore. But none were actually left, save merely a handful. Imagine then my later shock and awe, growing up, at seeing the conditions they currently lived in on the rez. In that world, Cherokee Louises were an everyday occurrence. What's fascinating to me is how strong a Canadian prairie accent Joni has. It's like living in Toronto again and hearing all these Canadianisms all around me. As I said before, remarkable woman. I met her briefly once at a gathering for Yaqui shaman Grandfather Cachora, one of the people that Carlos Castaneda based don Juan on. She was intense to the max, the very personific- ation of the triple Scorpio I've heard she is, but I liked both her sharp mind and her equally sharp tongue. She don't take no shit off of anybody, but at the same time she don't *give* anybody shit unless they try to put her into a box of some kind. Thanks for finding and sharing these videos, Vaj. I like hearing artists talk about where their songs or movies or books come from. It always provides insights into the mind of the artist, and into the process of creation itself. The whole concert is pretty much like that. She talks about her songwriting process and fields questions from the audience, the phone and the net. The entire DVD of the gig is on dimeadozen.net (sign up required): JONI MITCHELL Toronto, Canada Sept 23, 1994 Intimate Interactive MuchMusic TV I got a DVD here on DIME awhile back that, compared with this version, had inferior video and really inferior 192 kbps audio. Since I recently came into possession of this videotape, I thought I'd share it with you here. 1st gen VHS tape Cyberhome Standalone DVD recorder at SP HDD TMPGEnc DVD Author 3 chapters and menus VIDEO_TS 01 Intro 02 Sex Kills 03 Moon at the Window 04 Interview QA 05 Magdalene Laundries 06 Interview QA 07 Hejira 08 Cherokee Louise 09 Interview QA 10 Night Ride Home 11 Crazy Cries of Love 12 Interview, QA, and The Fishbowl (poem) 13 Just Like This Train 14 Facelift 15 Interview and Closing Credits Video Attribute : Video compression mode : MPEG-2 TV system : 525/60 (NTSC) Aspect Ratio : 4:3 Display Mode : reserved Source picture resolution : 720x480 (525/60) Frame Rate : 29.97 Source picture letterboxed : Not letterboxed Bitrate : 4.51Mbps Audio Attribute : Audio Coding mode : Dolby AC-3 Sampling Rate : 48kHz Audio application mode : Not specified Number of Audio channels : 2 Bitrate : 384.00 Kbps Number of Audio streams : 1
[FairfieldLife] Re: Why women shouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/19/wuspols2\ 19.xml Is Hillary Clinton the saviour of feminism? Or its albatross, dragging feminism backwards under a weary weight of old-guard victimology and male-bashing? That's it exactly. No real feminist I know would be the least bit impressed with Hillary's victim act. Or with other women who buy it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Why women shouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/19/ wuspols219.xml Is Hillary Clinton the saviour of feminism? Or its albatross, dragging feminism backwards under a weary weight of old-guard victimology and male-bashing? That's it exactly. No real feminist I know would be the least bit impressed with Hillary's victim act. Or with other women who buy it. I thought the article really nailed her: Hillary's voter base consists of middle-aged to elderly white women who identify with her caustic, stubborn, bulldog resilience. Humiliated and upstaged by her philandering husband, Hillary is the champion of an army of women who were stymied, betrayed or outmanoeuvred by men. Over the past year, whenever her cowed male opponents mildly rebutted Hillary in debate, her campaign jumped into über-feminist mode: male bullies, they screeched, ganging up on a helpless damsel. and: Hillary's recent remarks about politics as a boys' club resistant to uppity women was sheer demagoguery. By progressing farther than any woman presidential candidate, she has become a role model for future aspirants. But by attaching herself so blatantly to anti- male rhetoric - particularly in view of her debt to her husband - she is espousing a retrograde brand of feminism no longer applicable to the US. If Hillary loses, batten the hatches against a mass resurrection of paranoid, paleo-feminist martyrs, counting their wounds and wailing at the blood-red moon. Hmmm. Stubborn, bulldogged resistance of paranoid, paleo-feminist martyrs? That sounds familiar.
[FairfieldLife] Re: FInal MMY audio from Humboldt
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, These are great audios. Have you placed all the audios you possess on this group? Thanks. Mark --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: The uploaded final audio in my Humbolt series. Topic: education. Length: 34 min. http://www.box.net/shared/1a3up1midy All of the Humboldt audios are finished and uploaded to the previously given URL's. No files have been been posted on FFL, just the links.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Does Your Inner Transformation Method Improve your Outer Life?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So speak up oh experienced and wise ones who have been around the spiritual block. Do you have other criteria? Conciseness and simplicity.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Swami G chating with ex purusha about MMY
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, billy jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How pitiful. How lost. This is what happens when you don't know anything but what the TMO tell you. Agreed. The TMO puts forth a very seductive veneer of being a valid path, at least it did until the flaws in their pseudo-research were more recently exposed. A story such as his has become a common pattern. Let's all wish Tomas godspeed in his realization and freedom from false teachings/teachers.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Diet and Immortality
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I knew this guy in high school, an only child whose grandfathers developed Southern California, literally founded and built the entire city of Lakewood in the 1950s, 17000 houses, 20 schools, churches and a 250 acre shopping center. We fooled around alot, he being a great surfer and all around athlete. Well...into our early 20s he decided to become a radical vegetarian and convinced me to do the same, living on carrot juice, watermelons and California being the center of the health food movement at that time with health food stores popping up all over the place, it all made sense until about six months later, having dropped my weight by 60 pounds and muscle tone to nothing, I realize that I better start eating heavier foods and fast. Well...to cut to the chase, we went our own ways, me with TM, etc., and him continuing to drink and live on nothing but fruit juices, fruits and vegetables, all organic and produced locally of course. It's been twenty years since I've even spoken to this guy but it didn't surprise me when I happen to come across a picture of him and his mother on the internet the other day and noticed that he hadn't aged one bit, not looking a day over 35 and the guy was my age, now approaching 60 and here I am practicing the TM immortality technique and looking every bit my age. It's kind of haunted me for the last few days, wondering, even though we practice TM, if we really aren't exempt from aging the way everyone is. IMO, unless you are doing some sort of inner rasayana practice balanced with outer rasayanas, the benefit from TM is probably similar to people who take a nap every day. Even with that, I wouldn't expect such people to live any longer than the 90's and maybe crack 100. Several people in my practice lineage lived into the 130's and 150's, but it was thru realization and deep inner practice that they extended their lives, not just a meditation practice.
[FairfieldLife] Re: TurquoiseB made me see - praise Iesus.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote: Barry, Just to let you know, I really enjoyed reading your vignette about searching in the dark alleyways of your medieval town. However, rather than emailing you in the normal timeline, I have been waiting to send a thank you. You did send me a teethy little reply to some post I wrote a week or so ago, but I concluded that you were actually quite bored since Judy was on time-out. Sorry I didn't reply but I am unable to fulfill your pugilistic needs in the manner to which you have become accustomed. No problemo. I was just trying to point out that you were taking Vaj to task and challenging his statements in a thread to which he had never posted. You never seemed to notice. Probably from his Kentucky rasayana dose.
[FairfieldLife] Jesus Camp
From another list: analyze this http://rapidshare.com/files/41054578/jesus.wmv 1. Klick rigth underneath on FREE 2. Type de code 3. download A growing number of Evangelical Christians believe there is a revival underway in America that requires Christian youth to assume leadership roles in advocating the causes of their religious movement. This documentary, directed by Heidi Ewing and Rachel Grady, directors of the critically acclaimed The Boys of Baraka, follows Levi, Rachael, and Tory to Pastor Becky Fischer's Kids on Fire summer camp in Devil's Lake, North Dakota, where kids as young as 6 years-old are taught to become dedicated Christian soldiers in God's army. Imagine a place where focused, precocious kids pledge allegiance to a holy text and train as ideological warriors - even, yes, martyrs. You're imagining America - specifically, Kids on Fire, an evangelical madrassa devoted to fomenting a religiopolitical Children's Crusade. ''This world, all it feeds you is trash,'' says 12-year-old Levi. ''I want the meat.'' recensies: http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jesus_camp/ http://www.metacritic.com/video/titles/jesuscamp Cut to the flickering images of children writhing in a spiritual trance on a chapel floor while being hectored about the glory of dying for Christ, and one knows exactly where the first Christian suicide bombers will come from. --- Jesus Camp doesn't just preach to the converted, it bores and frightens them --- Evangelism's views on science and politics are so polarizing that almost any viewer, whether Orthodox, agnostic, or atheist, is bound to have an elemental reaction from the first shot of six-year-olds weeping in religious ecstasy.
[FairfieldLife] 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0
09 F9: A Simple Way to Stand Up Against the Latest Assault on Digital Rights By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet Posted on May 22, 2007 I have a number, and therefore I am a free person. That's the message more than a million protesters across the Internet have been broadcasting throughout the month of May as they publish 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0, the 128-bit number familiarly known as 09 F9. Why would so many people create MySpace accounts using this number, devote a Wikipedia entry to it, post it thousands of times on news-finding site Digg, share pictures of it on photo site Flickr, and emblazon it on T-shirts? They're doing it to protest kids being threatened with jail by entertainment companies. They're doing it to protest bad art, bad business, and bad uses of good technology. They're doing it because they want to watch Spider-Man 3 on their Linux machines. In case you don't know, 09 F9 is part of a key that unlocks the encryption codes on HD-DVD and Blu-ray DVDs. Only a handful of DVD players are authorized to play these discs, and if you don't own one of them, you can't watch Spidey in high definition -- even if you purchase the DVD lawfully and aren't doing any copying. For many in the tech community, this encryption scheme, known as the Advanced Access Content System (AACS), felt like a final slap in the face from an entertainment industry whose recording branch sues kids for downloading music and whose movie branch makes crappy sequels that you can't even watch on your good Linux computer (you guessed it -- not authorized). When a person going by the screen name arnezami managed to uncover and publish the AACS key in February, other people immediately began reposting it. They did it because they're media consumers angry about the AACS and they wanted Hollywood and the world to know that they don't need no stinkin' authorized players. That's when the Motion Picture Association of America and the AACS Licensing Administrator (AACS LA) started sending out the cease and desist letters. Lawyers for the AACS LA argued that the number could be used to circumvent copy protection measures on DVDs and posting it was therefore a violation of the anticircumvention clauses in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act. They targeted blogs and social networks with cease and desists, even sending notice to Google that the search engine should stop returning results for people searching for the AACS key (as of this writing, Google returns nearly 1.5 million pages containing it). While some individuals complied with the AACS LA, in many cases community sentiment was so overwhelming that it was impossible to quell the tide of hexadecimal madness. Popular news site Digg tried to take down articles containing the number, and for a while it appeased the AACS LA. But Digg is a social network whose content is determined by millions of people, and as soon as Digg staffers took down one number, it would pop up in hundreds of other places. At last Digg's founder, Kevin Rose, gave up and told the community that if Digg got sued, it'd go down fighting. Many other sites, such as Wikipedia and Wired.com, deliberately published the number in articles, daring the AACS LA to sue them. Sites like MySpace and LiveJournal are also rife with the number -- like Digg, these sites are made up entirely of user content, and it would be practically impossible for administrators to scrub the number out. The AACS key protests have become so popular because they reach far beyond the usual debates over copyright infringement. This isn't about my right to copy movies -- it's about my right to play movies on whatever machine I want to. The AACS scheme is the perfect planned obsolescence generator. It will absolutely force people to upgrade their existing DVD players because soon they won't be authorized to play new DVDs. Even worse, the AACS scheme allows movie companies to revoke authorized status for players. Already, the AACS LA has revoked the authorized status of the WinDVD media player, so anybody who invested in WinDVD will have to reinvest in a new player -- at least, until that player's authorized status is revoked too. The AACS, more than any other digital rights management scheme, has revealed that the Hollywood studios have formed a cartel with electronics manufacturers who will do anything to suck more money out of the public. If you want to watch lawfully purchased movies, the only sane thing to do is post the number. Stand up and be counted. http://www.alternet.org/story/52242/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Breaking News
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You are right, Judy. Lawson is very bright, from what I could gather. He can always return if he wants to limit the number of posts as everyone else does. It's a shame he could not get ahold of his obsessive posting tendencies, as he had a nice sense of humor and could be quite insightful at times. I really think Lawson could benefit from a style of meditation which would offer attentional training and attentional stability and balance--although I suspect he'd be scared to death to try it.
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Danger of Samadhi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coshlnx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: ---Re: Vaj says no Samadhi. No, actually I did not say that, although I did post an interesting article on wrong samadhi and it's dangers for discussion. It was not from a Dzogchen POV, but from a dude from the Thai Forest tradition. Actually, he's parrotting his Guru, Chogyal Norbu Rinpoche, who disses internalized silent sitting meditation; in favor of the Dzogzen direct cognition approach. The Actually, I've never heard ANY Tibetan or Buddhist lama diss internalized silent sitting meditation, esp. in Dzogchen where it's typical for such a student to be a master of sitting meditation IME. If you have a quote regarding this dissing, I'd love to hear it. It's certainly a comment which seems ignorant of how Dzogchen is actually practiced though, so I wonder if you're misinterpeting something you might have read. In any event, you may want to re-read the little article on wrong samadhi, as it really didn't have anything to do with Dzogchen, but instead it was more from the Sutra style sitting school of meditation (shamatha and vipassana styles). big snip of non sequitur material PS: If you get more than one copy, my apologies in advance. Yahoo!'s burping on some messages. :-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Danger of Samadhi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: http://what-buddha-taught.net/Books/Ajahn_Chah_Dangers_in_Samadhi.htm Wrong samadhi is where the mind enters calm and there's no awareness at all. ...the mind enters calm, and we don't want to come out to investigate anything. We just get stuck on that happiness ... With right samadhi, no matter what level of calm is reached, there is awareness. There is full mindfulness and clear comprehension. Last time you tried to make people believe the TM-Sidhi program is dangerous. IIRC, that was actually what the Holy Shankaracharya Order said. I merely conveyed the message. Since that time more evidence has come force from that tradition as well. Now your warning against Samadhi? Actually Peter, you should READ something before you post about. No, I did not write the article. It was an article on wrong samadhi. You are a self-confessed mason with a mission and I think there is a very strong need for you to come clean regarding what you are up to - what the end-vision for you work here really is? There is currently a movement in this country to re-seed all religious traditions with universal tools of Gnosis via esoteric Freemasonry. I am a founding member of this movement. Actually I am a Freemason; I am not a mason. And yes I have worked on establishing a gnostic 'common ground' for various mainstream religions to come together in the spirit of universal tolerance. It's not only been remarkably successful movement, it's been amazing to have the opportunity to meet so many different people from very different religious backgrounds. Getting various religions to appreciate the deepest common denominators they all share may be the only hope we all have for getting along together.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Never cut TM program
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote: Sez the man who has never had to take an ailing child to the hospital... According to SSRS, your children are your primary and most important self-development program. Everything else is secondary. Sorta makes sense to me. Great one. A big high five to Ravi for such great advice. A lot better than leaving your kids for months at a time with strangers.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Never cut TM program
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ffia1120 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This reminds me of the nuns telling us that if we didn't go to church on Sunday, we would burn in hell. It's very, very rigid thinking. I have not meditated in 8-9 years. I have a very sweet, happy, successful life here in FF. Three of my dome-going friends are on major anti-depressants -- the ones you see advertised non-stop on TV. Whether or not you meditate has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with whether or not you are happy and successful in life. Period. They might want to check out the kundalinicare.com people. Many, many people who practice the TMSP program have such problems, often due to unbalanced awakenings or blockages which will never resolve themselves by themselves. Many believe it will and if they just keep doing what they're doing, it will go away. In most cases, it will not.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Kewl linguistic tricks of Diirghatamas, part 1 (version 0.01)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: On Jan 10, 2007, at 6:36 PM, off_world_beings wrote: Beautiful, thanks. So why did you call the transcendental field translation crap? Because that's what it was: a pathetic marketing ploy to tie the then favored product, TM, to an iapaurusheya/i text. Once apaurusheya-style texts were in place, all ya needed to do was push the yagyas. The buy me sacrifices. Don't worry, we're glad to store your cc #'s... The history of the downfall of the TMO is a history of progressive exaggeration of a select bunch of Vedic verses and buzz-phrases. Once you begin to grok Sanskrit and gain some distance from TMO, it'll hit ya. Don't worry!
[FairfieldLife] Re: Amma's Apartment for rent
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, it seems to me that a saint carries his/her own vastu, and lives in a realm far beyond those considerations. Never were truer words spoken!, but I have to add that it's the same for EVERYONE, you, me and all. Amen.
[FairfieldLife] Re: Upcoming CIC Schedule, Costs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Om as in AUM? Yes, that way you have perfect transition to GC and the development of refined senses, all in one program--or so the theory goes: TMSP = CC cultivation, A of E with mantras allows soma to flow into various celestial spaces, refining perception = GC cultivation. It seemed helpful in that regard. Soma mandala details the process you just went thru symbolically enlivening and awakening this as it unfolds. It's the key to GC. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Maharishi Patanjali's Yoga Sutras'
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I am wondering, why Maharishi just chose the sutras which he chose. Experimentation presumably. Some sutras like the invisibility sutra were dropped early on when course participants actually succeeded. The story goes it could of been potentially embarrassing if these were known to a wider public. (So I was told). And also, if anyone has had experience with some of the other more advanced sutras which Patanjali mentions, or if a better translation would be needed to understand all of those concepts and Sanskrit terms? Yes. According to Tat Whale Baba's tradition, ALL sutras need to be done and in Natural language, i.e. Sanskrit. Also, I wasn't there, but, why is this technique you mention called, 'Age of Enlightenment' technique, just curious... If anyone knows of a good book of translation of some of these Sanskrit terms which are used in the study of transdencence and it's finer realities... R.G. Have you read the official Shearer trans.? It's the best in regards to TM, although inaccurate and apologistic IMO. There are greatly better trans. out there but they would have little relevance to TMers. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield Lite
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote: Wow! The traffic is down so much I thought I logged into the wrong site. Thanks to all of you who have gone on the wagon for the week. It is a joy to be able to read messages instead of deleting 90 percent of the useless traffic. This is almost heaven, AGAIN. Tom T The key word there is 'almost'. Actual heaven is the mind-blowingly delicious lunch I just made. Well give us the recipe then! To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield Lite
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vajradhatu108 vajranatha@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley j_alexander_stanley@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote: Wow! The traffic is down so much I thought I logged into the wrong site. Thanks to all of you who have gone on the wagon for the week. It is a joy to be able to read messages instead of deleting 90 percent of the useless traffic. This is almost heaven, AGAIN. Tom T The key word there is 'almost'. Actual heaven is the mind-blowingly delicious lunch I just made. Well give us the recipe then! The vegetable was a butternut squash, peeled and cut into roughly 1 cubes, and simmered in coconut milk with curry and saffron, salt to taste. But, not just a teensy bit of saffron. I buy really high quality saffron by the ounce (from http://www.saffron.com/ ), and use decadent quantities of it in a dish. WARNING! NON-VEGETARIAN RECIPE AHEAD! TOFU SHIELDS UP! FIRE RAKSHASHA TORPEDOS! . . . . . . . . . I put four locally grown lamb chops in a pan with the juice of one lime, some finely chopped fresh rosemary from the greenhouse, and some crushed garlic. I cooked them over low heat with the lid on, turned them over, and cooked them the rest of the way with the lid off (to reduce the liquid). As much as I like lamb when it's grilled, I make a point of not subjecting food to high temperatures most of the time. Wow, I'm not fond of lamb (haven't tried it in years) but this sounds great. I really like Thai food and I have spent years perfecting some of my favorite Thai dishes. It's definitely not a good idea to boil in coconut milk IMO, but a simmer is perfect. Sounds delicious Alex. If anyone's interested I could share my authentic Pad Thai recipe as I have time. It's the real McCoy. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Vajra Sword
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: from Stuart Davis' Blog ( www.stuartdavis.com ) Vajra Sword Submitted by stuart davis on September 21, 2006 - 12:25pm. Song of The Day: Supreme People / Blackalicious Word of The Day: Cruciation / torment or torture Vajra Sword needs to get laid more often. I could hook you two up, but I really thought Alex (aka John) was more his/her type... :-) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Out of Texas, a Wordless Wonder
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Anyone heard these guys? Yes, and Brave Combo, Denton, Texas. Brave Combo: Rarely, if ever, has a band name been more apropos, not only at the group's inception, but even more so 26 years after the fact. At first glance, back in 1979, the Denton, Texas, based outfit was, in shorthand, pegged as a New Wave polka band, a courageous if not almost oxymoronic endeavor during that particular rebirth of the cool. Read more: http://www.brave.com/bo/ They remind me of Godspeed You Black Emperor! but mellower. Ever get to see Rev. Horton Heat? He's from down your way. I loved him on the soundtrack of Love and a .45 To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Upcoming CIC Schedule, Costs
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coldbluiceman no_reply@ wrote: Dick Mays wrote: Alexandria DeVasier Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:42:09 -0500 To: Recipient List Suppressed:; Subject: Information about the upcoming CIC's. Could you broadcast asap Sure lest see..4 times each spaced 15 seconds apart.. samyama(just like you think the mantra) on each Friendliness Happiness Compassion Strength of an elephant Bronchial tubes sun moon pole star transcendence finest..hearing..taste..touch..sight..smell transcendence intuition Relationship body and akasha..lightness of cotton fiber. There I just saved everyone a boat load of cash.. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coldbluiceman no_reply@ wrote: Dick Mays wrote: Alexandria DeVasier Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:42:09 -0500 To: Recipient List Suppressed:; Subject: Information about the upcoming CIC's. Could you broadcast asap Sure lest see..4 times each spaced 15 seconds apart.. samyama(just like you think the mantra) on each Friendliness Happiness Compassion Strength of an elephant Bronchial tubes sun moon pole star transcendence finest..hearing..taste..touch..sight..smell transcendence intuition Relationship body and akasha..lightness of cotton fiber. There I just saved everyone a boat load of cash.. I recommend the Gov/Purusha version on the hearing, etc: Purusha...Divine Hearing (...) Purusha...Divine Smell They just seem to give clearer experiences. Also nice are the special sutras: Soma, soma, soma after flying in shivasana and/or after the A of E technique. My other fav. sutras are Word...Object Implied...the Idea Thereof Overlapping. and Moment and it's Sequence. If you want to blow your friend's minds try the The appearance of the body sutra, apparently disconned. Have a Transcendental time! Yeah they're great. I like soma, so that soma flows everywhere. Have you tried the Age of E. technique with the Om-based mantras? Sweet. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Dutch Newspaper Article on TM (rough translation)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: EVERYBODY ON A BIG PINK CLOUD By Maude Effting `People are more gentile here', says Radboud Matthijsen, director of the building company. `but they are also less assertive. Yes, it's true. You can be more gentile too with Maharishi Vedic Foreskin Reconstruction! Yes, even men who were previously circumsized can feel closer to the Unified Field through Maharish Vedic Foreskin Reconstruction. Painful? Heck no! It's blissful. With our patented formulation of Ayurvedic herbs and specially pundit consecrated silk gags, your screams won't even be heard. Order now at the special introductory price of 10,800 Raams. Your life partner will be glad you did. Experience the penetrating power of the Unified Field, just like Maharishi used to in the '60's! To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Dutch Newspaper Article on TM (rough translation)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coldbluiceman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: vajradhatu108 wrote: geezerfreak wrote: EVERYBODY ON A BIG PINK CLOUD By Maude Effting `People are more gentile here', says Radboud Matthijsen, director of the building company. `but they are also less assertive. Yes, it's true. You can be more gentile too with Maharishi Vedic Foreskin Reconstruction! snip Experience the penetrating power of the Unified Field, just like Maharishi used to in the '60's! And, what of the-- Maharishi Wedic Doeskin Supporter-- for support of nature? (Doeskin-lined jock straps) Maybe Walt Disney would let them use Bambi as part of their logo. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: the moon nakshatra and naming
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 stephen4359@ wrote: since it has come up twice recently, if anyone wants to find out about this all details can be found in William R Levacy's Beneath a Vedic Sky a good book about jyotish. He was an initiator. Most Jyotish programs will calculate this for you. Someone once told me where this comes from but I forget. Hi Kala, Yeah we had talked about this. It's from Dhavajadi and the A-Ka-Tha chakra therein, an old tantra. -Vaj To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: The Domes Revisited
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sep 22, 2006, at 9:17 PM, authfriend wrote: Would somebody who gets these posts via email and can see Durese's complete email address post it here using workarounds to keep Yahoo from truncating it, please? I'd really like to drop her a note complimenting her on this piece. You can find her on her Yahoo group, Fairfield Community Kiosk. Sal Was she the one of the FF enlightened who failed the Fred Travis enlightenment report card? For some reason I was thinking it was her. IIRC her list was originally set up as an antidote to the negativity of FFL. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: saaMkhya-yoga?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I wonder if reading saaMkhya-suutras could clarify the meaning of some of them yoga-suutras. Study of Samkhya is considered the prerequisite for study of the YS, which otherwise will just be misunderstood. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: effortlessness (Hot Button Issue?)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (snip) I'm honestly curious. This effortlessness thang is obviously a *serious* hot button for both you and Judy. You both react as if you had been personally attacked every time it comes up... The 'Effortless Thang' is a hot button indeed; Indeed, once again you have found, single handily: The Hot Button... And why is it such a hot button, I am wondering? Well perhaps, it's because the whole notion of effortlessness; Until Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, came onto the scene; Was not a widely understood concept or belief... And still causes much confusion, as explified in your piece... Actually this is a very ancient idea. I just returned from retreat and one of the texts I took with me was _The Authenticity of Spontaneous Presence_ which deals explicitly with Unity Consciousness and contains a whole section on effortlessness. One of the criteria you can look for to see if the system of practice you are using is effortless is to see if it is based on the Two Truths, a relative and an absolute. If it is, it cannot be effortless. In regards to transcending, the Expansive Space Great Completion Tantra says the following: Although the external appears as object Clear, non-conceptual, and so forth, Although the mind does nothing at all It's charmed, allured by the taste of the transcendent, so Eliminate just that internal superimposition. This is clear. Effortlessness cannot exist with a View that presupposes or works with two (truths) but only where Spontaneous Presence exists as Inseparability. This is epistemologically impossible where there is an overlay or superimposition as in the above quote. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: effortlessness (Hot Button Issue?)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vajradhatu108 vajranatha@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel babajii_99@ wrote: (snip) I'm honestly curious. This effortlessness thang is obviously a *serious* hot button for both you and Judy. You both react as if you had been personally attacked every time it comes up... The 'Effortless Thang' is a hot button indeed; Indeed, once again you have found, single handily: The Hot Button... And why is it such a hot button, I am wondering? Well perhaps, it's because the whole notion of effortlessness; Until Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, came onto the scene; Was not a widely understood concept or belief... And still causes much confusion, as explified in your piece... Actually this is a very ancient idea. I just returned from retreat and one of the texts I took with me was _The Authenticity of Spontaneous Presence_ which deals explicitly with Unity Consciousness and contains a whole section on effortlessness. One of the criteria you can look for to see if the system of practice you are using is effortless is to see if it is based on the Two Truths, a relative and an absolute. If it is, it cannot be effortless. In regards to transcending, the Expansive Space Great Completion Tantra says the following: Although the external appears as object Clear, non-conceptual, and so forth, Although the mind does nothing at all It's charmed, allured by the taste of the transcendent, so Eliminate just that internal superimposition. This is clear. Effortlessness cannot exist with a View that presupposes or works with two (truths) but only where Spontaneous Presence exists as Inseparability. This is epistemologically impossible where there is an overlay or superimposition as in the above quote. With all due respect, you are confusing effortlessness stated as the goal of action with instructions given for meditation. Actually I am not. If it was non-dual, there would be no goal, there would be no inward stroke. That's like saying I had a non-dual visit to the supermarket, all the while ignoring you had to drive from your home and then return to your home after being one with the market. When Maharishi has spoken about the absolute and relative areas of life, he has done so to explain what the adherent will do during meditation. He could've just as easily started with the end result, where there is no duality, but that doesn't provide any explanation of the process. This is incorrect on a number of counts. Never mind it's a known that yoga-darshana and samkhya-darshana are dualistic approaches as are any methods which rely on a support (e.g. a mantra, the breath, etc.). I didn't invent this. But your naivete in this area is also shared by many TMers, so you do have some company. :-) If it was non-dual, there would be no doing. Furthermore practice of TM relies on a principle known as the principle of increasing charm. Attention is naturally drawn to the transcendent. This charm constitutes a subtle form of delusion: the mind's attraction to something. This delusion constitutes an overlay or superimposition (to use Shankara's word for it). This is part of the reason that seeded samadhi is inferior to seedless samadhi--seeded samadhi relies of some action or process and it is tainted by that karma (or action). It's still caught within the chain of action. Patanjali and it's numerous supporting texts explain this fact in considerable detail. While it is important to understand the process in context of the end result, it is easier to explain it as a duality, so that the practitioner of the meditation understands that they are evolving from one state to another. Otherwise the practitioner will either get confused or lose interest. All spiritual practice tries to move the practitioner to the same place. It does? That's a new one! However it must be clearly explained how to get there. Whether this is seen as a gradual clarification of one Reality, or a linear path from the relative area of life to the Absolute is not important. However we tend as human beings to learn things in a linear way, hence Maharishi's explanation of the process of TM as a process recognizing both relative and absolute areas of life (when in fact the reality recognized when both are integrated is just one Reality). To continually bring up the supposed dualistic nature of the path of TM ignores the descriptive term inherent in TM: Transcendental. A Transcendental practice is by definition non-dual. No, to transcend implies a dualism. If it was non-dual there'd be nothing to transcend! :-) And of course it is because of this duality that Shankara was able to defeat in debate all those of yoga-darshana
[FairfieldLife] Re: I Hate 55%off FFL Posts by Three Posters. Give them time-outs?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@ If people don't want me here, just post that comment here on this thread and if enough people do so, I'll be happy to leave. Thats your perogative to take an all or nothing approach. But, of course, my suggestion was that posters try to keep within 10% of total posts. Otherwise to take a voluntary time out -- to regroup and reduce the urge for their compulsive jag -- and to form new habits, or if they are too compulsive to do so, an auto-trigger to give them such a rest. My premise is that when thoughtful posters sees pages and pages of Spraig/Judy/Shemp posts, they just slap their forehead and go away. Massive compulsive, drivel-prone, anger-spewing, peak posters drive away thoughtful posters. I susggest the following: * If over the next week, 10 people stand up and say they don't like this majority of (peak) posts by three posters, and ask to you to attempt to limit it to 10% each (aka the kindely request), then will you earnestly try to do so? * Same for Judy and Sparaig -- and others as they may arise over time. * If you are unable to control your urges to 10% of posts, will you agree to time-outs aka temporary suspensions to allow you time to regroup?. Lets say one week for the first time, two weeks for the second and subsequent times. If you (Shemp), Judy and Sparaig agree to this (in the next day or so), I will agree to the following: If 10 people don't stand up a make the kindly request, I will leave FFL. Thus illustrating that posters are driven away by a majority of posts by three people -- often drivel, anal-detailedness going nowhere, and ager vents, etc IMO. I have participated regularly on FFL for four years. I no longer care to if I have to wade through such majority sludge as cited above. If nine others stand up make the kindly request, then I think FFL can regain its health, vibrancy and friendly supportive environment of the past. If not, i think the trend, 40% === 60% ?, of posts by a few posters will continue as thoughtful posters drop out of the sludge, and the compulsive sludgers contine to jag on. Thus: I invite all posters to make the the kindely request: I don't like the majority of FFL (peak) posts being made by only three posters, and kindly ask to them to attempt to limit it to 10% each. Separate from the above, I invite all posters to consider taking a greener-pastures pledge: If i) Judy, Sparaig and Shemp agree to the earnestly try to each limit posts to 10% of total, if 10 people take make the kindly request. And if they are unable to do so , they agree to time-outs -- one week for the first time, two weeks for the second and subsequent times, and ii) 10 FFL memebers as a whole don't support this initiative, that is, less than 10 make the kindly request within a week of i) occurring, then the member state their intention to move on to forums that are less clogged with posts by a small minority --- posts which often have a drivel, venting, or nonrespective content. If several cycles of that doesn't work, I suggest that anyone can pull the stats and if someone is above 10% for a one-day or greater period, they are given a time-out for two weeks. Time-outs work for kids, and are hardly abusive. They help inform and provide feedback to people to help them get a grip. For compulsive, rude, or obnoxious for whom repeated group consensus to cool it' don't have an effect, then time-outs may be worth a try. I don't prefer the above time-outs. I prefer that 10 people stand up and say that they are sick of three people posting 50% or so of posts at peak times and ask them to please be become conscious of their effect of driving others away. Or we just start a new group, and don't give them the address. :) By the way, your stats are off. In Sept there have been 2841 posts. 130 by me. 4.5%. 6 a day. I like your idea of shooting for an average of 4. Some days, a bit more, some days a bit less. I support the idea, I'd just make it three strikes and you're out. There are already a number of invitation only FFL spinoffs they don't have the address of... To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
[FairfieldLife] Re: I Hate 55%off FFL Posts by Three Posters. Give them...
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: good ideas take some time out stop the incessant posting on non tm subjects This isn't a TM list dude. TM is a dead horse here which has been kicked, made into jerky, freeze dried, powdered, dehydrated and then recycled ad nauseum from the feces of the aforementioned. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Debbie henning -- keep anonymous
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: sparaig wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: sparaig wrote: [...] Who they? Annoop Chandola was taught to meditate by Swami Shantananda Saraswati, and he's under the impression that he learned TM or something extremely similar to it. TM is not that unique in its process. It is called yogic meditation in other circles. The actual use of the bijas particularly without OM is what is considered unorthodox. From what I've seen of how people describe other purportedly simple and easy meditatio techniques, very few are actually simple and easy. All that says is you haven't seen very much. Hence my term spirituality sheltered. That might be. However, one prominent exponent of the technique of Buddhist meditation that Vaj characterizes as effortless admonishes people to be vigilant in not letting oneself fall asleep or getting lst in thoughts, which to me, is a form of effort and control... Actually--as with TM where an effort must be taken to sit down to meditate and close eyes, maintain mindfullness to return to mantra, etc., etc.--the first stages of Shamatha (which is what I assume you are talking of) do also require effort/attention. This is typical of most intro meditation techniques and McMeditation techniques like TM are no different. *Any meditation technique that relies on a object of meditation, a mantra, the breath, etc. will by it's very nature have some subtle effort (as Mahesh acknowledged at Estes Park in regard to TM).* The higher stages of Shamatha practice are truly effortless in the yogic sense of that word: one decides how long to rest in samadhi and then emerges from samadhi at the end of the session. Unless you are actually familiar with the depth and breadth of meditation praxis experientially, this will not be obvious to you. So your above statement is incorrect--spiritually sheltered it would seem. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: effortlessness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer groups@ wrote: on 9/20/06 10:18 AM, authfriend at jstein@ wrote: Quoting an earlier post from Vaj: At Estes Park Maharishi pointed out that there really was some effort in TM. He quoted the Vedas as saying, 'Be easy to us with gentle effort.' Obviously we'd need a great deal more context to know whether Maharishi was using this quote to describe TM as involving some effort. Who is being addressed in the quote? It appears to be a request of some kind, but who is making the request, and of whom? And how would one entity making a request of another entity to be easy to us relate to TM? It related to TM. I was there. I had a feeling that Maharishi was experimenting a bit by bringing up the quote. He only mentioned it in one lecture. On my TTC at the end when we learned the last part of the teaching, we met with MMY and he asked us if we had any concerns before we went into that final phase. A fellow from France stood up and said that he had a problem with his own meditation: that every time he thought the mantra that he wanted to shout it out. After talking with him for a few minutes and sort of diagnosing what the situation was, Maharishi said to him: okay, look at my arm. I want you to think the mantra every time I move my arm up. And then he started to, very slowly at first, move his arm up and down. Then he started doing it faster and then really fast. And then he started to giggle. I forget what the outcome of all this was and whether the French guy was satisfied but what struck me was that in order to do what MMY said to do -- think the mantra every time he saw MMY's arm go up -- that effort was involved. Now, I know that this whole episode was a sort of clinic and all and it was all in context of this particular person's unusual meditation experience, but that's what struck me at the time: that MMY gave an instruction that necessarily required effort. The problem is with the word efffort. It implies a focused trying which is not how you do TM. I think a better word would be intent. In yogic parlance, the word for effort is prayatna. Effortless, is aprayatna. Technically speaking any process of meditation, subject and object which are transcended, will require a path and some effort, some intention. The only thing that is truly effortless is *nonmeditation.* Other things indicative of effort would be any mental process (e.g. subtler and subtler levels of mentation till conscious mentation stops), awareness of a mental object, any focus whether conceptual or non-conceptual, allurement or charm towards towards a calm or transcendent state, etc. That's not to say effort is bad, is just part and parcel of dualistic paths. Reflexively authentic open awareness is not focused on any particular object and this is why no effort is needed. Any consciousness by necessity arises from causes, one of which is an object, even a subtle object. Self-arisen wisdom does not need an object. In fact effortless, nonmeditation requires *no subject or object. * (back to lurk mode) To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: effortlessness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vajradhatu108 vajranatha@ wrote: That's not to say effort is bad, is just part and parcel of dualistic paths. Reflexively authentic open awareness is not focused on any particular object and this is why no effort is needed. Any consciousness by necessity arises from causes, one of which is an object, even a subtle object. Self-arisen wisdom does not need an object. In fact effortless, nonmeditation requires *no subject or object. You mention something called a dualistic path above, which necessitates the existence of a non-dualistic path, which is of course impossible, for who is on the path then? Someone on a pathless path. Paradox is the logic behind such a pathless path. So, even an effortless nonmeditation, where the goal is self-arisen wisdom, is a practice distinct from daily activity, and hence, a dualistic path. Who said it was distinct from everyday activity? What you have described above is a non-dual nonmeditation possibly *within a dualistic path*, requiring effort to distinquish between the nonmeditation used to bring about self-arisen wisdom, and all other activity. No. It's a sudden approach as opposed to a gradual approach (e.g. Patanajali-yoga, Buddhist Lam Rim, etc.). You'll find an emphasis and insistence on effortlessness as hallmarks of sudden schools like Zen/Chan, Dzogchen/Mahasandhi, some Trika schools and so on. Only when we speak about our establishment in a non-dual state, and the path existing *within* the non-dual state, is any practice of meditation, or nonmeditation, or watching TV, or eating a meal, dancing or sleeping, experienced as a non-dual path, within the non- dual state; A path of endless knowledge, existing within itself. Now you're getting closer. Ask yourself this question: if there is true effortlessness, could there be separation? Effortless in TM spin was merely a way of saying it was easy. Later it became an amalgamated as part of the dogma--and we all simply believed. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: effortlessness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd put it this way, before enlightenment all is effort and afterwards, by definition there is no effort. In a pathless path one is directly introduced to the enlightened state *from the beginning*. Once one knows, in their own experience, what the mysterious object, the Big E is, one no longer remains in doubt. One applies the Fruit, the Big E, *as the Path.* IMHO this is what the vast majority of people who claim full enlightenment are beginning to grok--at different levels of integration--the Fruit applied as the Path. Bass ackwards, but works great. As Mahesh Varma said to to course participants recently in regards to the question of whether people in the TM transmission had attained the Big E (grossly paraphrased): there are many who have awakened to themselves. So this verifies my feeling. Of course I could have it all wrong. I always found TM to be easy, but never thought about whether or not it was effortless. Thanks for clarifying your message. now I can reread the original and get what you are saying. Gladly. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' Yahoo! Groups Links * To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ * Your email settings: Individual Email | Traditional * To change settings online go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join (Yahoo! ID required) * To change settings via email: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] * To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] * Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
[FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric Sexual Practices (was Urdhva-retas?)
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:46 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote: On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:00 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote: What specifically have you heard? I never heard him mention tantra -- that I can recall. A friend I know asked him directly about tantra, so I'm replying based on that response. And what specifically was MMY's response. It had to be more than I am dismissive of that. It was not very approving. Not approving of real tantra or sexual tantra? Sorry, for some reason am not getting all messages, so responding on this weird web interface. Tantra in general. I think your answer lies in 'what types and styles of tantric practice do we see aligned with the Shankaracharya tradition and the Advaita Vedanta tradition.' Well while it may not (or may) be part of the Shankaracharian tradition and the Advaita Vedanta traditions (Isn't Brahman which is EVERYTHING part of those traditions :) ) Brahman in tantra? Find me a quote if you think it is. OK DOKIE. Perhaps my sense of references is out of whack, maybe not. Let my joke be made abundantly clear: Well while it may not (or may) be part of the Shankaracharian tradition and the Advaita Vedanta traditions (Isn't Brahman which is EVERYTHING part of those Shankaracharian tradition and the Advaita Vedanta traditions :) ) If you are still reading that I am saying Brahman is in tantra, well what can I say. Yeah I got that, but the return joke is Brahman is more part of prissy Vedanta. I was making a joke via an indisputable tain of logic: Everything is in Brahman, thus tantra is in Brahman. And since Brahman is at the core of part of Shankaracharian and Advaita Vedanta traditions, therefore tantra must be part Shankaracharian tradition Advaita Vedanta traditions. :) Yes I got that. The real joke is, it is not generally part of tantra. They postively and absolutley did not include union with the Goddess? Not in the teaching I received. But that is hardly comprehensive or conclusive. It wasn't intended to be, it *was* intended to be a window on the style of practice of SBS. And is 1000 Heaeded Purusha related to shankaracharian andavaitian traditions? Rig Veda, a famous quote I thought. They have sexual practices. Energol. Shake-up the energy etc. (clarifications from puruasha welcome.) Presumably to keep ojas from drying up. Some celibate sadhus seem to have sexual related rituals. Indeed they do. So you are absolutely positive that no practices from advaitain / shankaracharian tradition do not invole sex in any form? It's a renunciate trip dude. It would also depend on what you mean by any form. I just gave several examples: Oh, those. union with the Goddess? Energol. Shake-up the energy In any event, you're getting off tangent here. Well I may be on a tangent for your train of thought. Not mine. I hope you see the difference. The person who there is the most evidence FOR using sexual tantric practices with his disciples is probably Muktananda IMO. Not M. Of course there is Adi Da also. Which is fine. My primary hypothesis, which you have provided no evidence of substance to counter is that i) it is possible M. had knowledge of multiple, if not many real tantric practices, including the small subset related to sex and union and flows, and ii) its possible he expermiented or practiced such in his encounters,and iii) maybe it was raw sensual sex. If you have any such evidence that it was i) NOT possible M. had knowledge of multiple, if not many real tantric practices, including the small subset related to sex and union and flows, and ii) its NOT possible that he expermiented or practiced such in his encounters, and iii) OR that maybe it was NOT raw sensual sex, then provide away. Once again, ANYTHING is possible, some things are more probable. It's highly improbable M. is a tantric adept, for the numerous valid reasons I've already given. But it would be helpful to have a clearer blow-by-blow description from one of the ladies involved. ;-) One further comment. Most tantra which is of a sexual nature also requires a corresponding female adept, otherwise there is utter imbalance in the equation. Since there is no mention of these women being trained in such--quite the opposite, extant accounts seem to show more of a shock at the spiritual incest they endured. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' SPONSORED LINKS
[FairfieldLife] Re: Getting To Yes
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: TorguoiseB writes: snipped I sat there trying to not have as much fun with the day as I knew I was capable of having, and then I caught myself doing it. The moment I did, I was able to laugh at myself. And through my laughter, I found my body saying Yes. Out loud. Weirdest damned thing. Everything changed. Background flipflopped into foreground and the witnessing, a moment before unnoticed, moved front and center and reasserted its Self again. And all it took was getting to Yes. I'm sure it'll pass...all things do...but it's neat while it lasts. Life's cool sometimes, yes? Tom T: Very astute observations. Reminds me of Patanjali Chapter 3 Vs 54: Knowledge born of the finest discrimination takes us to the farthest shore. It is intuitive, omniscient and beyond all divisions of time and space. Vs 55: And when the translucent intellect is as pure as the Self, there is Enlightenment. It is the Self knowing the Self but there is the working of the intellect that makes the final and finest discrimination. Actually the above quote is about viveka-khyati --an important experience and discrimination which can continue for quite a while, but alas is not liberation--athough that is the next chapter (of the YS). It *is* often confused with liberation. The Self knowing the Self is still a ways off. You may have seen the man behind the curtain Dorothy, but there's still more to Oz than this. As to the cool stuff passing it is sometimes easier to think of it as aclimination to what is going on. If we aclimate then we have virtually no contrast and then the coolness is the ongoing day to day reality. It is my experience that all this cool stuff just gets more and more aclimated too and then we know it as our day to day everyday life. Enjoy. Tom Interesting description of viveka-khyati. The self continues to present experiences to Self and more objects of awareness gain the slippery teflon coating of Love, eventually absorbed by Self. To subscribe, send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/ and click 'Join This Group!' SPONSORED LINKS Maharishi university of management Maharishi mahesh yogi Ramana maharshi YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web. To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.