[FairfieldLife] Re: Wow

2012-01-20 Thread vajradhatu108
I couldn't find your picture - but maybe I'll eventually figure it out.

I have talked briefly to Robin here (compared to the occasional lengthy 
responses I get from him). IMO it was actually nice to know he was still alive 
and kicking, and the rumors of his demise were horribly exaggerated. And 
getting to hang a little here has been fun although sometimes challenging.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@... wrote:

 If you actually knew me you would remember my name, so you either know me or 
 you don't know me, very likely doesn't enter into it. I was not a small 
 player. And I, unlike you, am willing to step from behind some smokescreen, 
 tell you my name, my history and I posted a profile picture.
 
 What you seem to be keeping alive is your interest, maybe even your 
 obsession, with Robin Woodsworth Carlsen. He appears on FFL and you are all 
 over it. You have written more words to and about this man than is normal for 
 someone who is not harbouring some deep-seated, insatiable hunger to provoke 
 and engage him. You are in denial if you can not admit this. Take two weeks, 
 it will take you about that amount of time, to re-read all the words, words, 
 words that you have volleyed his way. I see this as having kept something 
 alive.
 
 This old laundry thing, now I guarantee that if I sent you one of my old 
 WTS tapes of big juicy confrontations, manifestations and all the other 
 goodies that are on it, you would throw it into your VHS player (if you still 
 had such a relic) with gusto.
 
 I agree that you have virtually forgotten your experience with WTS if your 
 descriptions of the processes i.e. confrontations are any indication.
 
 I've never been an angry person. No comment.
 
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
 
  
  On Jan 19, 2012, at 9:16 PM, awoelflebater wrote:
  
   Perhaps we knew each other at one time?
  
  I'd suspect that's very likely.
  
   If you are an American then for sure I would know you if you were witness 
   to many cosmic confrontations including confronting Robin. However, 
   when being confronted by him it was by default reciprocal. It was a two 
   way confrontation. Like watching ping pong, back and forth, back and 
   forth.
  
  True.
  
   I am also not quite sure of your motivation for keeping all of this alive 
   for 25 years.
  
  Keeping all what alive?
  
  This is old laundry. Not very interesting at all. Except for voyeurs who 
  like to watch such things as people tossing old stuff.
  
   For you to do so it must have been a very traumatic experience. I can 
   understand that.
  
  It was not a traumatic experience for me in the least. I had a great time. 
  But it's something virtually forgotten...and like old laundry, not worth 
  devoting too much time to. Being asked to sort thru my old laundry for 
  interesting pieces is what seems odd to me. If some of that old laundry 
  involves people I cared for, I'm even less likely to hang it out to dry.
  
  You on the other hand seem happy to talk about it. And that's fine too.
  
   What I can not quite understand is the need to carry it for so long. 
   But then your description of a confrontation on the stage sounds like 
   someone who has either never been there, has a faulty memory or is 
   fishing to find out if I am the real thing. Either way I am happy to 
   answer your questions but hopefully you are wanting them answered in 
   order to close the book on your anger.
  
  I've never been an angry person, so again, I'm not sure what you're talking 
  about.
  
  My last experience with Robin - or Robindra as I often refer to him - was 
  one always recalled as a moment of hilarity. It's virtually impossible for 
  any of those present to keep from falling into laughter.
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: David Wants to Fly

2011-10-14 Thread vajradhatu108
Dear MZ:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, maskedzebra no_reply@... wrote:


 Dear Vajradhatu,
 
 You are convinced of the objective truth of enlightenment. I have
tried to explain that while on the one hand enlightenment has an
objective basis in a definitive style of functioning [as opposed to
waking state functioning], it cannot be objectively true in the sense
of being the way things really are. 

Then you would be in direct contradistinction to Buddhist enlightenment.
In fact so-called Hindu enlightenment would be considered forms of
suffering - and actually you do a good job of describing it as such (if
one accepts that you were in a bonafide brahma-chetana in the first
place).
As long as your premise is: There is such a thing as enlightenment, and
it represents the highest state of consciousness there can be, then it
becomes simply an argument between someone who believes and knows there
is a God, and someone who believes and knows there is no God. 

One can also believe such entities or neural-glitches such as gods do
exist but that their worship, propitiation and administration only leads
to suffering for the sentients that do so, and in extenso to other
sentient life forms. A quick gander at world history will show the
simple correctness of this view - if you have no attachment to god and
son type ideals.
In an even more recent view, belief in gods is a glitch from our remote
past carried on by carriers of a god gene and were supported and
inculcated via a malignant form of social disease known as religion.
The good news is, once a gene is identified, open minded liberals could,
through genetic testing, test for the god gene and simply abort the
defective fetus. Over several generations we could lessen the incidence
of religious disease. Social diseases such as neo-conservatism, as their
genetic glitches become better known (the phenomenon is already
beginning to be understood by neuroscientists) could also be eradicated
over several generations.
I say abort god now!. A major initiative to identify god-worshipping
defects and to protect the right of abortion would do much to alleviate
the suffering of a planet infected with the social disease of
god-religion.
More as I have time.
V.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi was a manipulator.

2011-01-30 Thread vajradhatu108



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seekliberation seekliberation@... 
wrote:


  Simple Mantra japa, though a good start, is far from knowing how to 
  consciously withdraw to Samadhi. Most Westerners aren't ready for a 
  Sat-Guru anyway and he probably knew that, (the demands a Sat-Guru places 
  on a disciple aren't just *effortless*, ha, ha)!
 
 That's a good point.  There were a lot of 'fairy tale' believers running 
 around in the TMO who thought they were just going to glide right into 
 enlightenment automatically because someone told them they will.  Many of 
 those people believed in the whole 100% effortless lifestyle that achieving 
 enlightenment is supposed to give you.  Many of those people, to include 
 friends and family of mine, are now finding themselves in their 40's and 50's 
 with no money, no job skills, no significant attributes to rely on, and no 
 wealthy parents around to take care of them, and they're living a poor 
 economy.  It would be easy to blame it all on MMY, the TMO, or some of the 
 people in the TMO elite inner circle.  But i've always said that if you walk 
 down a rough neighborhood dressed nicely with money in your wallet, it's 
 going to get taken every time.  You can curse the thug who took it, but 
 you're the idiot who kept walking down the same street.  

I guess the conclusion they should be reaching (or should have reached years 
ago) is that 100% effortless lifestyle is bullshit. Sometimes simple mantra 
japa, is just simple mantra japa.

Where your argument falls apart is that TM digs were made to look like palaces 
and the leader and his cronies did not look they were living in a rough 
neighborhood. Dressed in the finest silks, many insiders were quite wealthy (or 
at least tried to dress the part) and lived opulent lifestyles, it wasn't at 
all like your imaginary rough neighborhood. Unless you live in a ghetto where 
the books and the furniture are gold-gilt. ;-)

The sattvic upside: bullshit is 100% organic when the right ingredients are 
ingested. But it's still inedible.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Maharishi was a manipulator.

2011-01-29 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seekliberation seekliberation@... 
wrote:

 That brings up another good point.  When I was a student at MIU/MUM I 
 remember a lot of anxiety going around regarding whether or not someone would 
 attain enlightenment in this lifetime.  Later in life, while studying Vedic 
 teachings from someone else, I was exposed to the concept of Vaikuntha.  
 Vaikuntha was supposed to be the Hindu equivelant of 'Heaven', and sometimes 
 'enlightenment'.  According to the author, Vaikuntha directly translates as 
 'No Anxiety'.  So essentially, 'enlightenment' and 'heaven' is the same thing 
 as 'No Anxiety'.  Yet it seemed to me that there was a lot of anxiety running 
 around the TMO regarding whether or not we were doing enough for 
 enlightenment, world peace, meditating enough, etc  
 
 In other words, we were putting ourselves in a state of anxiety in order to 
 achieve a state of no anxiety.  
 
 seekliberation


Good points!

Why do you think they (the pundits, Bevan, etc.) kept chanting Maharishi is in 
heaven, Maharishi is in heaven when he had died? 

Because they believe incarnation into a heaven-dimension is a prerequisite for 
full awakening.

Better luck next time!



[FairfieldLife] Re: iPad Mellotron, etc. simulator

2011-01-28 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote:

 On 01/27/2011 06:13 AM, Vaj wrote:
  Mellotron, Drum, Guitar, Bass, etc. played on iPad and IPhone playing 
  In the Court of the Crimson King.
 
  http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d4lJW-SWhKI
 
  LINK
 
  This song may contain tamasic elements. - CPPT
 
 Ever play a Mellotron?  We had one for a while at the music store where 
 I worked after returning from TTC in the 1970s.  Funky machine.  I think 
 my Mixcraft installation even has it as a virtual instrument.


Yeah, I have. They were very high maintenance and constantly prone to breakdown.

I got a set of all the sounds in 24 bit format (free on the web), recorded in a 
studio and made them into virtual instruments for Garageband, then I can 
trigger them with a keyboard or a guitar synth.

The original company has now actually licensed an official app version for the 
iPad. But IMO it's just too small for a person with normal or large hands. It 
would be perfect for Hobbits though. :-)




[FairfieldLife] Re: Dharana (concentration) beautifully explained!

2011-01-28 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wgm4u@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, RoryGoff rorygoff@ wrote:
 
  Here is how I interpret this No-self experience: The so-called states of 
  TC, CC, GC, and UC describe an ever-closer approach between Purusha and 
  Prakriti, or the Absolute and the Relative, or Father Spirit and Mother 
  Matter. Kundalini, both from below and from above, acts as a kind of 
  more-or-less constant conductor or tunneler to effect their approach and 
  eventual marriage.
  
  Using a Cosmic Body as a map of their progress, we can posit that 
  Transcendental Consciousness (TC) activates the Crown Chakra (Shiva; 
  Purusha) and the Foot Chakra (Shakti; Prakriti); Cosmic Consciousness (CC) 
  moves down into the Brow (Witness) and up into the Base (Organs of action; 
  Physical plane) to effect a witnessing of activity; God-Consciousness (GC) 
  moves down into the Throat (Space; bliss) and up into the Sex (Senses; 
  Astral-emotional) to structure blissful senses and subtle-body experiences; 
  and Unity Consciousness (UC) moves down into the Heart (Buddhic intuition; 
  finest feeling) and up into the Navel (Manas or animal mind) to move beyond 
  the senses into an intuitive grasp of One-ness. 
 
 
 Actually I think it's a little different in Classical Yoga, when the Serpent 
 Fire reaches the 6th Chakra that is Self-Realization or what MMY calls CC, 
 when it further reaches the 7th that is what MMY calls Unity or what 
 classical Yoga calls CC.  Different terms for the same thing, try not to let 
 it confuse you.
 

Actually basic forms of samadhi begin in the upper ajna. Then one goes through 
a series of novel samadhic experiences.  CC or turiyatita is associated with 
consciousness stabilizing at a certain point above the crown of the head. It's 
really only in this realm that one begins to transcend the outer (physical 
form) of the breath and taps into the inner breath.





[FairfieldLife] Re: What to expect at Art of Silence?

2010-08-26 Thread vajradhatu108
Sounds like a great time, please keep us posted!

I'm sure there are a number of people who could share stories and I hope they 
do so here.

The nice thing about having a lineage is 'there's always more than one person 
you can hang with.'

We have the popular SSRS ashram nearby in Montreal, and we were going to check 
it out but we opted to check out Gampo Abbey in Cape Breton instead, and 
weren't disappointed (even though Pema Chodron was not in residence at the 
time).



[FairfieldLife] Re: Desperation to fill the Domes

2010-08-25 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.p...@... wrote:

  I am not sold on SSRS.  But I do like his Art of Living kriya and the
 breezy style exuded by the teachers of SSRS I've met.
 

Sometimes the burgers are better on the other side of the fence.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Desperation to fill the Domes

2010-08-25 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.p...@... wrote:

 On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:57 AM, vajradhatu108 
 no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote:
 
 
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@ wrote:
 
I am not sold on SSRS.  But I do like his Art of Living kriya and the
   breezy style exuded by the teachers of SSRS I've met.
  
 
  Sometimes the burgers are better on the other side of the fence.
 
 
 Erma Bombeck said it best in the title of her book *The Grass is Always
 Greener Over the Septic Tank*.
 
 I am finding each day that the Art of Living kriya is taking the doom and
 gloom out of my TM/TMSP.  I go into my program now full of light and
 experience that light throughout my TM/TMSP program.  I remember, soon after
 becoming a sidha, taking a week long WPA at  H. St. NW.  A more
 experienced sidha despaired of his chronic insomnia.  Others chimed in.  I
 couldn't understand how something as wonderful as the TMSP could allow this
 sort of suffering to creep in.  Over the years people tried marmalade, vastu
 and basti, all to no avail.  I saw the sidhas around me becoming depressed,
 nearly falling over from lack of sleep, becoming unglued.
 
 It's very clear to me, having been on CCP for a very long time when it got
 down to just Bobby Kennedy and myself, then on IA a decade later, that
 there's something wrong with the TM/TMSP.  It's unbalanced, as, I suspect,
 was it's spiritual leader.
 
 Me, I'm happy as a clam right now and could happily leave this group were it
 not for the very vigorous conversations that have taken place here in the
 last month or two revealing the good, the bad and the ugly side of
 Maharishi, the TMO and MMY's teachings.   IMO something very important was
 missing from the TM/TMSP practice (balance, perhaps?).  I've gotten it back,
 alas, and I'm happy for that.
 
 But I no longer need his departed Holiness, his Dome, his bogus 1%, square
 root of 1% numbers and his organization, or what's becoming at least three
 organizations, one in Vlodrup, one in Paris and one in India.

 Well it's great to hear how it worked for you.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Desperation to fill the Domes

2010-08-25 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck dhamiltony...@... wrote:

 Oh,he'd pssibly go back if asked real nice
 to meditate and do the TMSP in a large
 group meditation.  They could just ask and trust
 people that way too.  If their interest is
 in facilitating large group meditations.
 
 Given the situation here, they just ain't going to get the numbers
 they want without giving up some of their position.  They
 are really down to just some hundreds of folks to draw on the way they have 
 it excluded.  Is pitiable, its been done so badly.
 

Well could they actually do it without going against the direct wishes and 
injunctions of their founder? After all, it's he they represent. If they fudge 
that, it's no longer adherening to the teachings of the Maharishi.



[FairfieldLife] Shukra: Critique of Art of Living/Kriya course

2010-08-24 Thread vajradhatu108
Weren't you the guy who claimed SSRS took you to a nadi-style jyotish reader 
and he shewed you the nadi-leaves which stated that Maharishi Mahesh Yogi was 
one-sixteenth of an avatar?

If so, you should alert Rick, as the person that previously some believed that 
could verify it (Prof. D.S.) is going back to India.

Now would be an interesting time to verify this claim you shared here 
previously.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 shukr...@... wrote:

 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.pall@ wrote:
 
  When I looked at the schedule for the course, I didn't realize that it was
  just more than Friday evening.  It was also all day Saturday and all day
  Sunday.  I couldn't figure out why a course would take that long.  To my
  regret, I found out why.  It's full of a bunch of Vedic homilies an 8 y/o
  would scoff at and a lot of New Age exercises which should have died in the
  1960s at the Esalen Institute.  One thing for certain, teacher training must
  be something very different from TTC, because if TM is considered Yoga Lite,
  then the Art of Living must be Yoga made with aspartame.
  
  The two long kriyas we practiced were extremely powerful.   Regrettably, the
  first long kriya, on Saturday, kicked in my flying sutra 
 SAME
 
 BUT GAVE ME TOTAL INSOMNIA LATE
 and those asana
  mats aren't anywhere near as soothing as the foam in the golden domes.
  
  The follow up is very casual and very helpful.  As opposed to the TMO where
  everybody's shit is supposed to smell like roses, the Art of Living people
  all practice and teach forgiveness, acceptance of themselves and others, and
  cherishing of diversity.  A very welcome relief.
  
  The take home kriya is extremely powerful.  I do it before I commence my
  morning TM/TMSP.  I am filled throughout the day with prana.  A very nice,
  soothing and energizing feeling.  The prana helps a lot in the TM/TMSP
  practice.
  
  There are 2 free long kriyas offered at my AOL center a week.  One is
  allowed to take only one of these a week, as they have so very much power.
  I will be attending these long kriyas.  This stuff's powerful.
  
  It's difficult to get used to SSRS after decades of listening to Maharishi
  go into intricate detail.  I'm not at all sure if I will partake of the
  knowledge parts nor if I will take the Art of Silence (extended, in
  residence guided meditations).  Time will tell.
 





[FairfieldLife] Epilogue: Prairie Peace Park is facing its end

2010-08-24 Thread vajradhatu108
Nature supports and nature taketh away...

http://journalstar.com/special-section/epilogue/article_2d4b8d0e-aecf-11df-8bd3-001cc4c03286.html

The Prairie Peace Park opened in 1994. Interstate 80 travelers often dropped in 
to view the unique, peace-oriented artwork and exhibits. Annual visitation 
averaged about 600. Faced with financial problems, the Prairie Peace Park Board 
sold the park in 2005 to a transcendental meditation group based in Fairfield, 
Iowa.

PLEASANT DALE -- The Prairie Peace Park has fallen on hard times.
Old tires and shattered glass and an empty Jim Beam bottle litter the entrance.
Weeds grow in the cracks of the parking lot, which is scattered with asphalt 
shingles and debris from an abandoned house nearby.

There are no welcome banners to greet visitors -- only a big for sale sign 
and a colorful mural on the side of the house, featuring flowers, sun, people, 
music symbols and a globe supported by hands.
It wasn't always this way.

The Prairie Peace Park once was a place where the seeds of peace were sown by a 
group of visionaries who wanted a venue where people could meditate about ways 
to change a violent world.

The park opened June 11, 1994. More than 1,500 people attended, including actor 
Ed Asner, children's singer Raffi and the late U.S. Sen. J.J. Exon.

Sixteen years later, the park is about to be sold, its mission of fostering 
world peace lost in 27 acres of weeds and trees and neglected sculptures and 
exhibits.

Marc Snow with NAI FMA Realty in Lincoln has been working with a buyer 
interested in the land and has a contract under review.

Don Tilley, president of the Prairie Peace Park Board, was not surprised by the 
news.
We were expecting it to happen, he said.

Tilley, one of the park's founders, had high hopes its peace mission would live 
on after the board sold it in 2005 to Global Country World Peace, based in 
Maharishi Vedic City, Iowa.

The group, affiliated with Maharishi University of Management in Fairfield, 
Iowa, planned to build a 12,000-square-foot peace palace on site to teach 
transcendental meditation and host public lectures.

We always had some hope, Tilley said. When they tried to sell the property, 
we kind of guessed it (the peace palace) wasn't going to happen. (...)



[FairfieldLife] Re: Desperation to fill the Domes

2010-08-24 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wgm4u wg...@... wrote:

 What a goofy program to begin with..NONE of them, I repeat NONE of them 
 are functioning from the home of all the laws of nature, (OK,maybe a wee 
 faint awareness, when they're not sleeping).
 
 What a disaster this whole program has been to the entire TM effort!! but 
 then, maybe it's instructive as to who MMY really was to begin with..(hint, a 
 Hindu reformer).

If you think aging sexually perverse renunciates intoxicated with wealth and 
self-image can be reformers?

What's he reforming?, the RIg Ved?

Give me a frickin' break!



[FairfieldLife] Re: Desperation to fill the Domes

2010-08-24 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Tom Pall thomas.p...@... wrote:

  Perhaps Jungian synchronicity, perhaps the Sport of Nature Maharishi always
 talked about.  I only took 10 years to decide to take the Art of
 Living/Kriya course.  The talk here about was Maharishi a petty, hateful
 guy, the kriya, meeting teachers of another guru who are natural.  SSRS
 stresses naturalness, forgivingness, helpfulness.  I at first looked down on
 my friends who were still going to IA (on my support, airfare,
 transportation, and so on).  Now I just let them be.  Let the Dome be.  I
 will do my program, aided by the kriya I do before morning program.  Let
 those who run MUM, the TMO and Dome policy go tither and commit fornication
 upon thineselves.


Gawd I always find it entertaining when a TM cult fanatic leaves and just 
jumps into another corporate guru's org.

I guess if you're crazy about McDonald's and get some bad burgers it's only 
natural for you to go to Burger King or White Castle. 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-09 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra...@... wrote:

 What is it with you vaj. You didn't at all deal with the point I was making.  
 Just because Maharishi was not an expert or even a practitoner of hatha yoga 
 does not mean he was not a yogi.
 And by the way, in a post you made to me in response to a comment I made 
 several months ago, you specifically said that Maharishi poisoned his guru.  
 You can say whatever you want now, but thats what you said to me some months 
 back.

Actually Mahesh was a *leading suspect* in the poisoning of Swami Brahmananda, 
that doesn't necessarily mean *he actually did it*. What it says to me is the 
even back then, among contemporaries, he wasn't held in the highest esteem.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-09 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunsh...@... wrote:

 On Jul 8, 2010, at 7:47 PM, vajradhatu108 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra108@ wrote:
  
  Hey Vaj,
  
  Most of the real yogi's that I met in India, never practiced asanas.
  You should know that yoga means so much than asana. So if Maharishi had 
  someone else who was an expert in that areadesign the course, it just 
  shows that he didn't claim to be a know it all. And it has nothing to do 
  with whether he was a yogi or not
  
  Or, of course, maybe he just added the yogi as his own alias?
 
 Or maybe he really meant Yogi Bear?
 But he was talking too fast, and the last
 name just got dropped off somehow.
 
 We'll never know.
 

Hmmm.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay/Judith Bourque

2010-07-09 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, yifuxero yifux...@... wrote:

 
 right...this is the Internet, not a Dan Brown conspiratorial group. Just come 
 right out and state your agenda, no problem. People would applaud you (Vaj) 
 first, first for doing that; then reserving the choice to blast the actual 
 content of what agenda you are pushing at a later date.  Let's hear it.


There is no agenda, there's only the (to me) obvious fact that Mahesh fooled a 
lot of us. You see it's not really about ME. So now we know he was not a 
Brahmachari, a monk, a life-long celibate. He not only lied, he tried to 
convince others the abstain from sex, encouraged cold showers, testicular ice 
wraps, the married to stop having sexual intimacy, etc. 

So the question naturally arises, if you're not in deep denial, how much else 
is untrue?

I'm placing my bets on rishi and yogi. YMMV. It was a pretty good act while 
it lasted.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-09 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra108@ wrote:
 
  If you haven't noticed, Vaj has the constant need to be right on his
 opinions. For some reason, he thinks he is an expert about Indian and
 Vedic knowledge, even though he clearly isn't. Don't know why he has to
 feel he is more knowledgeable than so many of us. How come Vaj?
 
 There just ain't no body that can talk the talk like Vaj.  Between Veda,
 advaiata, neo advaita, post advaita, 2nd degree this, fourth degree
 that.  Vaj is a lettered man when it comes to discussing these things. 
 Iguess letters and pedigree, and titles rule in Vaj's spiritual
 universe.  He wants some fruit salad on that dhoti.


Actually I don't support the idea of taking on spiritual titles. 

But if you do, they should have some substance behind them!

Apparently there is no substance behind Ole Mahesh's assumed titles. I think 
historically the important thing in that he fooled the Beatles. Then he was 
able to ride on their fame and seem believable. And he had a really good 
schtick and excellent business sense.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-09 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote:

 
 vajradhatu108 no_reply@ wrote:
 
 
  Mastery of yoga isn't dependent on literacy.
 
  Having said that, I was never a fan of Vivekananda and the other
 vaishnava-protestant Hindu supremacists expounding their mythical
 Vedism. Yuck.
 
 Sounds like you've got it pretty well worked out Vaj.  That's neat.  Got
 all the place settings in proper order.  I'm always interested in the
 perspective from someone who has arrived. 

Sounds as if you like judging me because I said something you didn't like. I 
guess that's too bad. Find another scapegoat for your own denial. It's not my 
fault you were not able to discriminate very well.

 The only question I might
 have is, why, when you stepped upon a different, apparantly better path,
 are you so interested in the path you've left.  Like, I have a
 girlfriend I was very close with many years ago, but it didn't work out,
 and I've moved on.  Yet I don't find myself spending a lot of time going
 over the details of that old relationship.  It's that  living in the
 present type  thing where I choose to be.  On the other hand, maybe the
 present isn't as interesting as that older time.

I'm commenting on the recent findings RE: Judith Bourque's book, and appendant 
issues. Of course if somebody brings up a topic from the past, that was not 
known before esp., it's natural to comment on it. Given that many people have 
some deep denial on the issues surrounding Mahesh, it's not surprising that 
people need to find someone to attack. I can tell this is probably difficult 
for you to process. It seems ex-TM teachers and ex-TM teachers who remained 
involved in neohinduism or neovedism will have the most difficult time.






[FairfieldLife] Re: Prediction

2010-07-09 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote:

 I'm heading over to Batgap.  The question I have is, will there be any 
 discussion of The Book  I say no.  I think they generally avoid 
 unpleasant topics.  Well, here I go folks.  If you don't hear back from you 
 in a few days, come in after me.


Enjoy the sattva.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-09 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB no_re...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra108@ wrote:
 
  Its true.  And somehow he thinks he knows everything about 
  Maharishi's time with Guru Dev and is an expert in that area 
  also. He appears to really believe that all Maharishi was 
  during that time was a glorified clerk running errands.  
 
 NOT to get into the Bash the Maharishi critic 
 rather than deal with the issue fest or anything,
 but I believe this, too, *based on Maharishi's
 own accounts*. In my experience he never claimed
 anything else. 
 
 Anything else was invented IMO by hanger-ons who 
 were trying to invent justifications for putting MMY 
 up on a pedestal.
 
 While it's true that Vaj has a thing for being right,
 it IS good to remember that only one of the three
 names in Maharishi Mahesh Yogi is deserved; the rest
 were invented, to better market to the West, where
 they have neither the criteria for telling whether
 a spiritual title is deserved or not, nor the 
 desire to find out. This is all about Protect the
 importance of the guy I hung out with for so long
 so that I can cling to *my* importance in having
 gotten to hang with him IMO.
 
 I'd have more respect for the TM crowd *or* those
 who want to preserve their good feelings about MMY
 if they just did what Joe suggested -- read the 
 friggin' book and then discuss it rationally, with-
 out trying to diss the writer or those who believe
 her vs. the TMO version. My only point so far in 
 all of this is that the *immediate* reaction of
 some is to try to diss the writer; the *immediate*
 reaction of others is to try to diss those who
 believe her. 


Exactly.

And Mahesh looks like the only title left standing. 

What I'm noticing, besides the obvious denial of the TM fans, is that it is not 
obvious to them that once the farce of being a monk fails, there are certain 
other things that either naturally come into question or themselves fall by the 
wayside as his blatant lack of integrity is revealed.

It's interesting because despite all the talk about maya in TM-circles, it 
shows that there is no way to be effortlessly free of our own delusions. In 
fact deciding to be some part of any 'spiritual group' almost seems to insure 
that you'll embrace some of their delusions in the process. 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-09 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra...@... wrote:

  News to me.
 
 Well if you don't believe it, why did you say that Mahrishi poisoned his Guru 
 in a resonse to something I said months ago on this forum.  

Randyanand, could you please point me to that post so I'm clear what exactly 
you are referring to? Thanks.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-09 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 fest...@... wrote:

 
 
 And yet he changed so many people's lives for the better -- indeed, rescued 
 many lives, mine included. He figured out a way of reaching me, a confused 
 17-year-old high school drop out, and giving me something that permanently 
 turned my life around. I guess all the more qualified yogis were sitting 
 around in India being very learned and doing whatever it is that real yogis 
 do. Maharishi, on the other hand, actually decided to make a difference in 
 real people's lives all across the world. Great seer? You bet. 
 


And of course let's be open and not forget the negative things that happened as 
well, the lives that changed for the worse: people committed suicide, 
experienced psychosis, some donated and lost their family fortunes, became 
neoadvaitin egomaniacs, etc. Was it more with TM than any other technique? 
That's hard to say, but I can't think of a worse example really, can you?

I think it's important to see the big picture.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay/Judith Bourque

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Joe geezerfr...@... wrote:

Judith Bourques own affair with MMY started in Rishikesh in 1970 and continued 
on until it tapered off in Seelisberg when it was clear that MMY's interest 
was drifting away towards several other women.
 

So what's that, a ten year span?

Was he any good in bed? Cut or uncut?



[FairfieldLife] Mahesh YINO

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister no_re...@... wrote:

 
 
 In my understanding, a yogii/yoginii can do just about anything without
 collecting kriyamaaNa-karma, or whatever. Heck, even kill
 their relatives!
 
 **karmaashuklaakRSnaM** yoginaH... (YS IV 7).



Of course if you believe this, the person in question would have to be an 
*actual* yogi, not a YINO.

A Shankaracharya who knew Mahesh has stated that he never knew or studied yoga. 
Indeed his yoga asana course was designed by someone else! A close examination 
of his teachings also reveals no signs that he was trained as a yogi.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote:

 
 
   In my understanding, a yogii/yoginii can do just 
   about anything without collecting kriyamaaNa-karma, 
  or whatever... 
   
 Vaj: 
  Of course if you believe this, the person in question 
  would have to be an *actual* yogi, not a YINO.
  
 Apparently the Mahesh Yogi was doing exactly what a
 tantric yogi is supposed to be doing. But, what is an 
 *actual* yogi? Was your guru the 'Swami Rama of the 
 Himalayas' and *actual* yogi? LOL!

Not, my guru was not Swami Rama.

 
  A Shankaracharya who knew Mahesh has stated that 
  he never knew or studied yoga.
 
 According to the Shankaracharya of Jyotirmath, Mr. 
 Varma was a 'yogi' who was trained by a self-realized 
 master - Swami Brahmanand Saraswati, who was 
 considered to be a 'Maha Yogi'. 

Actually there's no evidence that Mahesh received any special teaching from 
Brahmananda beyond his public teachings.

 
 It should be noted that the Shankaracharya mentioned
 by Vaj has been arrested and charged with premeditated
 murder, so Vaj's sources can't be trusted to tell the 
 truth.

Not that I'm aware of.

It should be noted that Willy apparently owns a Red Herring business.


 
  A close examination of his teachings also reveals 
  no signs that he was trained as a yogi.
 
 So, you're saying that spending thirteen years at
 the feet of Yoga Master doesn't count as training to
 be a 'Yogi'? Go figure.

No, I'm saying spending 13 years at a desk or running errands doesn't count as 
training as a yogi. This ain't Texas, home schooling doesn't count.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote:

 So, you're thinking there is a 'special teaching'
 involved in being a 'yogi'? What secret teaching would
 that be? 

No, I was not thinking that.

 
   It should be noted that the Shankaracharya mentioned
   by Vaj has been arrested and charged with premeditated
   murder, so Vaj's sources can't be trusted to tell the 
   truth.
  
  Not that I'm aware of.
  
 Why didn't you tell us that the Shankaracharya is in jail 
 accused of murder? The news was all over the Indian press.
 
  It should be noted that Willy apparently owns a Red 
  Herring business.
  
 You brought up the Shankaracharya as an information 
 source, not me. As it is, you're looking like you're a 
 dishonest informant to say the least.

It's not new information, Karpinski's interview has been around a long time 
Willy.

And there's a new movie you can check out called David Wants to Fly which 
explains that Mahesh was never actually authorized to teach at all. Go figure, 
huh. It's really not that much of a surprise that he also lied about being a 
life long celibate, a monk.

I wonder if Larry King will have Judith on?

  
A close examination of his teachings also reveals 
no signs that he was trained as a yogi.
   
   So, you're saying that spending thirteen years at
   the feet of Yoga Master doesn't count as training to
   be a 'Yogi'? Go figure.
  
  No, I'm saying spending 13 years at a desk or running 
  errands doesn't count as training as a yogi. 
 
 So, you're saying that anyone who runs errands or sits at
 a desk at a yoga camp can't be a yogi? You're not making 
 any sense.
 
  This ain't Texas, home schooling doesn't count.
 
 But, you got your yoga training in Maine, right?

Wrong. 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108






--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra...@... wrote:

 Which Shankaracharya was that?

Sri Swami Swarupananda, Jagadguru of Jyotir Math.

Typically yogis don't hide where they learned and trained in yoga-darshana. If 
they're hiding where they acquired that knowledge or who their teacher was, it 
often means they're trying to hide something about their past or simply being 
untruthful.

There is a long-standing rumor by an old TMO insider that Mahesh actually did 
train in Buddhist chandali-yoga (Tib. gTummo), in which case he would have to 
have received the third and fourth initiations of inner- and nondual-tantra, 
which the fourth initiation does authorize one as a yogi. It could also explain 
why he kept it secret since he represented himself as coming from the tradition 
of advaita-vedanta a la Shankara, not tantric Buddhism.

But that is just a rumor and IMO, highly unlikely. Since Swarupananda is far 
more privy to such inside information, I'll defer to his opinion.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote:

 
 
   Which Shankaracharya was that?
  
 Vaj:
  Typically yogis don't hide where they learned 
  and trained in yoga-darshana. 
  
 So, why not just tell us your real name and when
 and where you were trained to be a yogi? 
 

Kind of a moot point because I don't use the title yogi after my name!

Of course if I did teach or used a title in teaching, I would, like my 
teachers, share who my teachers were with my students, when I met the various 
teachers (and how) and what initiations I'd received, etc.

(Hopefully this will go thru. For some reason my post on Mahesh's alleged 
tantric initiations didn't go thru to the list or my other posts.)



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, WillyTex willy...@... wrote:

   So, why not just tell us your real name and when
   and where you were trained to be a yogi? 
   
 Vaj:
  Kind of a moot point because I don't use the title 
  yogi after my name!
  
 So, you've got no title, and you've received no special
 training, but you are telling us what a yogi is supposed 
 to be? 

Of course, I've never said that. Thanks for demonstrating the relationship 
between Texas textbooks and reading comprehension! 

Do you mind if I cross-post your posts the Huffington Post?

Thanks.






[FairfieldLife] Re: Robes of Silk, Feet of Clay/Judith Bourque

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Joe geezerfr...@... wrote:

 
 This is why further conversation about this is a bit useless until you read 
 the book. After a few more people (including you) read this we can start to 
 have some potentially VERY interesting discussions.

Until I either find the book in the bargain bin or the Cliff notes version is 
available for about 5 USD, I ain't spending 40 bucks to find out what I already 
knew in the 80's.

Would you consider outlining the text and merely quoting the most lurid 
details? We'd really appreciate it.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108




--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote:

  vajradhatu108 no_reply@ wrote:
 
  A Shankaracharya who knew Mahesh has stated that he never knew or studied 
  yoga. Indeed his yoga asana course was designed by someone else! A close 
  examination of his teachings also reveals no signs that he was trained as a 
  yogi.
 
 So his asana course was designed by someone else.  Like so what.  Did he 
 claim to be an expert in yoga. 

Steevo!

Next time ya get a chance, check out the last four letters in the Big Reesh's 
assumed name.

I know, I know. You probably missed it. Or you may be from Texas.

But usually people who put the four letters Y-O-G-I after their names know a 
little bit about yoga.

Just sayin'. ;-)



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, seventhray1 steve.sun...@... wrote:

 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vajradhatu108 no_reply@
 wrote:
 
  No, I'm saying spending 13 years at a desk or running errands doesn't
 count as training as a yogi. This ain't Texas, home schooling doesn't
 count.
 
 This is funny.  Ramakrishna was illiterate, or nearly so.  Yet he
 attracted Vivekenanda.  Go figure that.  Guess Ramakrishna was just a
 goofball in Vaj's book.  Didn't have the Yogi imprimiteur, wherever you
 get that.  Maybe from the Wizard of Oz.  He pulls it out his bag.


Mastery of yoga isn't dependent on literacy.

Having said that, I was never a fan of Vivekananda and the other 
vaishnava-protestant Hindu supremacists expounding their mythical Vedism. Yuck.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra...@... wrote:

And he also believes Maharishi poisoned Guru Dev and there is no evidence of 
this either.  

Is that what I believe?

News to me.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Mahesh YINO

2010-07-08 Thread vajradhatu108


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, randyanand ra...@... wrote:

 Hey Vaj,
 
 Most of the real yogi's that I met in India, never practiced asanas.
 You should know that yoga means so much than asana. So if Maharishi had 
 someone else who was an expert in that areadesign the course, it just shows 
 that he didn't claim to be a know it all.  And it has nothing to do with 
 whether he was a yogi or not

Or, of course, maybe he just added the yogi as his own alias?





[FairfieldLife] Re: Snow Leopard arrives

2009-08-28 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer r...@... wrote:

 From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:fairfieldl...@yahoogroups.com]
 On Behalf Of Vaj
 Sent: Friday, August 28, 2009 1:49 PM
 To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
 Subject: [FairfieldLife] Snow Leopard arrives
 Just installed in 20 minutes. It's true, I actually have 7 gigs of 
 extra space. It's like having a new computer. It's actually a faster 
 OS than the previous version imagine that.
 
 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/08/27/technology/personaltech/ 
 27pogue.html?_r=1emc=eta1
 Did it arrive by mail or UPS? We ordered it, but the mail already came and
 no Snow Leopard.


They sent it overnight Fed Ex. If you weren't there when they knocked, you 
might have missed it. i had to print out and place on my front door a document, 
with my signature and permission to just leave it. Of course i had to also 
sign and consent in case some hooligan--presumably a raccoon or a bear sensing 
food might abscond with my precious package sigh. Both my wife and I weren't 
home and we knew that would likely be the case--Fed Ex are sticklers on 
computer items for either a live signature or the simple letter on the door 
(I'd typically sign an 8.5 x 11 piece of paper with my message scrawled in 
Sharpie).

Anyhow, they were kind and left it, nicely placed in our mudroom. I'm certain 
the Jack Russell's probably lunged at the poor delivery guy on the glass 
windows, although who just can't laugh at Jack Russell's lunging at anything?

If said package has not arrived and you ordered it or have an account with 
apple.com, you can track it simply by signing on and going to the store and 
then checking order status. Order status has a live-link to Fed Ex, which 
will give you all details.

 i knew i had it, before i left where I was logged on!



[FairfieldLife] Re: The 5 Stages of Fascism

2009-08-28 Thread vajradhatu108

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nelsonriddle2001
nelsonriddle2...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
 
 
  On Aug 28, 2009, at 9:06 AM, WillyTex wrote:
 
   Vaj wrote:
  Worried about the gun nuts...
 
 Well, I always thought the 'Brown-shirts'
 were the ones wanting to take AWAY the
 weapons owned by the people. In order to
 do that in the U.S.A., you'd have to
 repeal the Second Amendment.

 The last thing the Gestapo would want is
 for the people to have a well regulated
 and armed militia. So, if you're wanting
 to take away my civil rights, then that's
 probably illegal in the U.S.A.

   Nelson wrote:
I believe the first and second amenndment
are both under attack.
   
   So, the 'Brown-shirts' are attacking the U.S.
   Constitution. They think that American
   citizens who support the Constitution are
   'gun nuts'. So, the 'Brown-shirts' call the
   Americans who support the Second Amendment
   'Brown-shirts', but the real 'Brown-shirts'
   are the liberals who want to take away our
   civil rights. So, you're saying that the
   fascists are attacking in '5 stages' and this
   is the first stage, calling us 'gun nuts'?
 
 
  No, no, no.
 
  The Brownshirts are the right-wing extremists who are threatening
our
  Democracy by showing up bearing arms at town meetings Willy. These
  are meetings for talking, not shooting. So what we need to do is
take
  away the guns of right-wing extremists and dangerous militia groups.
  Everyone else would get to keep theirs. It might just be easier to
  chip them. You already have a legal militia in Texas called the
Texas
  National Guard. Don't spit in their faces by going vigilante on
them!
  No one wants another Waco Willy or another McVeigh or another
  Columbine or another Virginia Tech or another Pittsburgh cop killer
  or another George Tiller killer or insert next nut.
 
  There was a famous painting many people have on their walls in the
  northern US by an artist named Norman Rockwell of what a town hall
  meeting is supposed to look like. There are no guns in that picture
  and everyone's free to speak their mind. There are no Brownshirts in
  that picture Willy. And that's the way us Yankees would like to keep
  it. We like to feel free to speak our minds. We don't need no
  Teabagging Brownshirts around.
 
  And you're supposed to read the article before you respond to it
WIlly!
 
It looks to me  like this picture is sort of inside out--the right
wing extremest and malitia groups were what saved the country back when.
They were the patriots of their day.   Older Yankee





[FairfieldLife] Re: The 5 Stages of Fascism

2009-08-28 Thread vajradhatu108

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nelsonriddle2001
nelsonriddle2...@... wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
 
 
  On Aug 28, 2009, at 9:06 AM, WillyTex wrote:
 
   Vaj wrote:
  Worried about the gun nuts...
 
 Well, I always thought the 'Brown-shirts'
 were the ones wanting to take AWAY the
 weapons owned by the people. In order to
 do that in the U.S.A., you'd have to
 repeal the Second Amendment.

 The last thing the Gestapo would want is
 for the people to have a well regulated
 and armed militia. So, if you're wanting
 to take away my civil rights, then that's
 probably illegal in the U.S.A.

   Nelson wrote:
I believe the first and second amenndment
are both under attack.
   
   So, the 'Brown-shirts' are attacking the U.S.
   Constitution. They think that American
   citizens who support the Constitution are
   'gun nuts'. So, the 'Brown-shirts' call the
   Americans who support the Second Amendment
   'Brown-shirts', but the real 'Brown-shirts'
   are the liberals who want to take away our
   civil rights. So, you're saying that the
   fascists are attacking in '5 stages' and this
   is the first stage, calling us 'gun nuts'?
 
 
  No, no, no.
 
  The Brownshirts are the right-wing extremists who are threatening
our
  Democracy by showing up bearing arms at town meetings Willy. These
  are meetings for talking, not shooting. So what we need to do is
take
  away the guns of right-wing extremists and dangerous militia groups.
  Everyone else would get to keep theirs. It might just be easier to
  chip them. You already have a legal militia in Texas called the
Texas
  National Guard. Don't spit in their faces by going vigilante on
them!
  No one wants another Waco Willy or another McVeigh or another
  Columbine or another Virginia Tech or another Pittsburgh cop killer
  or another George Tiller killer or insert next nut.
 
  There was a famous painting many people have on their walls in the
  northern US by an artist named Norman Rockwell of what a town hall
  meeting is supposed to look like. There are no guns in that picture
  and everyone's free to speak their mind. There are no Brownshirts in
  that picture Willy. And that's the way us Yankees would like to keep
  it. We like to feel free to speak our minds. We don't need no
  Teabagging Brownshirts around.
 
  And you're supposed to read the article before you respond to it
WIlly!
 
It looks to me  like this picture is sort of inside out--the right
wing extremest and malitia groups were what saved the country back when.
They were the patriots of their day.   Older Yankee





[FairfieldLife] Re: The 5 Stages of Fascism

2009-08-28 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, nelsonriddle2001 nelsonriddle2...@... 
wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
 
  
  On Aug 28, 2009, at 9:06 AM, WillyTex wrote:
  
   Vaj wrote:
  Worried about the gun nuts...
 
 Well, I always thought the 'Brown-shirts'
 were the ones wanting to take AWAY the
 weapons owned by the people. In order to
 do that in the U.S.A., you'd have to
 repeal the Second Amendment.

 The last thing the Gestapo would want is
 for the people to have a well regulated
 and armed militia. So, if you're wanting
 to take away my civil rights, then that's
 probably illegal in the U.S.A.

   Nelson wrote:
I believe the first and second amenndment
are both under attack.
   
   So, the 'Brown-shirts' are attacking the U.S.
   Constitution. They think that American
   citizens who support the Constitution are
   'gun nuts'. So, the 'Brown-shirts' call the
   Americans who support the Second Amendment
   'Brown-shirts', but the real 'Brown-shirts'
   are the liberals who want to take away our
   civil rights. So, you're saying that the
   fascists are attacking in '5 stages' and this
   is the first stage, calling us 'gun nuts'?
  
  
  No, no, no.
  
  The Brownshirts are the right-wing extremists who are threatening our  
  Democracy by showing up bearing arms at town meetings Willy. These  
  are meetings for talking, not shooting. So what we need to do is take  
  away the guns of right-wing extremists and dangerous militia groups.  
  Everyone else would get to keep theirs. It might just be easier to  
  chip them. You already have a legal militia in Texas called the Texas  
  National Guard. Don't spit in their faces by going vigilante on them!  
  No one wants another Waco Willy or another McVeigh or another  
  Columbine or another Virginia Tech or another Pittsburgh cop killer  
  or another George Tiller killer or insert next nut.
  
  There was a famous painting many people have on their walls in the  
  northern US by an artist named Norman Rockwell of what a town hall  
  meeting is supposed to look like. There are no guns in that picture  
  and everyone's free to speak their mind. There are no Brownshirts in  
  that picture Willy. And that's the way us Yankees would like to keep  
  it. We like to feel free to speak our minds. We don't need no  
  Teabagging Brownshirts around.
  
  And you're supposed to read the article before you respond to it WIlly!
 
It looks to me  like this picture is sort of inside out--the right wing 
 extremest and malitia groups were what saved the country back when.  They 
 were the patriots of their day.   Older Yankee


It only appears that way if you don't realize how the Republican party has 
morphed over time. It's no longer any sort of real, honest republican party! 
In fact it could be argued that our current party system is no true two-party 
system, only a two-party system by name. In actuality they're one and the same 
in effect.

It also helps to point out that founding fathers were in no way way remotely 
connected with the words Republican party and the current party of the same 
name. They're two different entities entirely. Nor are they the Federalists 
they imagine themselves as.

If the founding fathers (my ancestors) saw the Republicans of today, they would 
either be planning a way to destroy them or (at best) deport them.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Anapanasati Meditation

2009-08-21 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jr_esq jr_...@... wrote:

 To All:
 
 This meditation technique works.  It's very powerful.  Please, see the link 
 below:
 
 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Mk8LyM1Io4Afeature=related


My Patanjali guru, who was from a Rig Vedic pundit family, also said the same 
thing. He claimed that it was the fastest way to bring awareness into the 
avadhuti or sushumna--primordial awareness, our natural state, 
mahamudra--whatever you want to call it--anapanasati, vipassana or whatever. 
I've heard some  people claim it's the universal technique because you find it 
in Vedanta, Christianity--all religions in some form. I don't know if I believe 
that...but it is interesting.





[FairfieldLife] Re: A Song Dedication for Pope Ratzinger

2008-04-22 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
 
  On Apr 21, 2008, at 4:28 PM, TurquoiseB wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
  
   I'd like to dedicate this song video to Pope Ratzinger
   on his first visit to America.
  
   http://home.earthlink.net/~vajranatha/Joni_Mitchell.html
  
   I'd like to follow up on this, if I might.
   I think that this is a remarkable video, and
   an interesting moment captured.
  
  
  Equally remarkable, add racism and sexism though:
  
  http://home.earthlink.net/~vajranatha/2
  
  I am a descendent of William Penn's favorite Indian translator (and  
  the favorite and most trusted of the natives). So I grew up in natural  
  awe of the natives of Pennsylvania, their sacred sites and lore. But  
  none were actually left, save merely a handful. Imagine then my later  
  shock and awe, growing up, at seeing the conditions they currently  
  lived in on the rez.
  
  In that world, Cherokee Louises were an everyday occurrence.
 
 What's fascinating to me is how strong a 
 Canadian prairie accent Joni has. It's like
 living in Toronto again and hearing all these
 Canadianisms all around me.
 
 As I said before, remarkable woman. I met her
 briefly once at a gathering for Yaqui shaman
 Grandfather Cachora, one of the people that
 Carlos Castaneda based don Juan on. She
 was intense to the max, the very personific-
 ation of the triple Scorpio I've heard she
 is, but I liked both her sharp mind and her
 equally sharp tongue. She don't take no shit
 off of anybody, but at the same time she
 don't *give* anybody shit unless they try
 to put her into a box of some kind.
 
 Thanks for finding and sharing these videos,
 Vaj. I like hearing artists talk about where
 their songs or movies or books come from. It
 always provides insights into the mind of the
 artist, and into the process of creation itself.
 
The whole concert is pretty much like that. She talks about her songwriting 
process and 
fields questions from the audience, the phone and the net. The entire DVD of 
the gig is on 
dimeadozen.net (sign up required):

JONI MITCHELL 
Toronto, Canada 
Sept 23, 1994 
Intimate  Interactive 
MuchMusic TV 

I got a DVD here on DIME awhile back that, compared with this version, had 
inferior video 
and really inferior 192 kbps audio. Since I recently came into possession of 
this videotape, 
I thought I'd share it with you here. 

1st gen VHS tape Cyberhome Standalone DVD recorder at SP HDD TMPGEnc DVD 
Author 3 chapters and menus VIDEO_TS 

01 Intro 
02 Sex Kills 
03 Moon at the Window 
04 Interview  QA 
05 Magdalene Laundries 
06 Interview  QA 
07 Hejira 
08 Cherokee Louise 
09 Interview  QA 
10 Night Ride Home 
11 Crazy Cries of Love 
12 Interview, QA, and The Fishbowl (poem) 
13 Just Like This Train 
14 Facelift 
15 Interview and Closing Credits 

Video Attribute : 
Video compression mode : MPEG-2 
TV system : 525/60 (NTSC) 
Aspect Ratio : 4:3 
Display Mode : reserved 
Source picture resolution : 720x480 (525/60) 
Frame Rate : 29.97 
Source picture letterboxed : Not letterboxed 
Bitrate : 4.51Mbps 

Audio Attribute : 
Audio Coding mode : Dolby AC-3 
Sampling Rate : 48kHz 
Audio application mode : Not specified 
Number of Audio channels : 2 
Bitrate : 384.00 Kbps 
Number of Audio streams : 1






[FairfieldLife] Re: Why women shouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton

2008-04-22 Thread vajradhatu108

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
 
 

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/19/wuspols2\
19.xml
 
  Is Hillary Clinton the saviour of feminism? Or its albatross,
  dragging feminism backwards under a weary weight of old-guard
  victimology and male-bashing?

 That's it exactly. No real feminist I know
 would be the least bit impressed with Hillary's
 victim act. Or with other women who buy it.





[FairfieldLife] Re: Why women shouldn't vote for Hillary Clinton

2008-04-22 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajradhatu@ wrote:
 
 
 http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/04/19/
wuspols219.xml
  
  Is Hillary Clinton the saviour of feminism? Or its albatross,
  dragging feminism backwards under a weary weight of old-guard 
  victimology and male-bashing?
 
 That's it exactly. No real feminist I know 
 would be the least bit impressed with Hillary's
 victim act. Or with other women who buy it.


I thought the article really nailed her:

Hillary's voter base consists of middle-aged to elderly white women who 
identify with her 
caustic, stubborn, bulldog resilience. Humiliated and upstaged by her 
philandering 
husband, Hillary is the champion of an army of women who were stymied, betrayed 
or 
outmanoeuvred by men. Over the past year, whenever her cowed male opponents 
mildly 
rebutted Hillary in debate, her campaign jumped into über-feminist mode: male 
bullies, 
they screeched, ganging up on a helpless damsel.

and:

Hillary's recent remarks about politics as a boys' club resistant to uppity 
women was 
sheer demagoguery. By progressing farther than any woman presidential 
candidate, she 
has become a role model for future aspirants. But by attaching herself so 
blatantly to anti-
male rhetoric - particularly in view of her debt to her husband - she is 
espousing a 
retrograde brand of feminism no longer applicable to the US.

If Hillary loses, batten the hatches against a mass resurrection of paranoid, 
paleo-feminist 
martyrs, counting their wounds and wailing at the blood-red moon.

Hmmm. Stubborn, bulldogged resistance of paranoid, paleo-feminist martyrs? 

That sounds familiar.



[FairfieldLife] Re: FInal MMY audio from Humboldt

2007-08-20 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Hello,
 
 These are great audios. Have you placed all the audios you possess on
 this group? Thanks. Mark
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  The uploaded final audio in my Humbolt series.
  
  Topic: education.
  
  Length: 34 min.
  
  http://www.box.net/shared/1a3up1midy
 

All of the Humboldt audios are finished and uploaded to the previously given 
URL's. No files 
have been been posted on FFL, just the links.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Does Your Inner Transformation Method Improve your Outer Life?

2007-08-20 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 So speak up oh experienced and wise ones – who have been around the
 spiritual block. Do you have other criteria? 

Conciseness and simplicity.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Swami G chating with ex purusha about MMY

2007-08-20 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, billy jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 How pitiful. How lost. This is what happens when you don't know anything but 
 what the 
TMO tell you. 

Agreed. The TMO puts forth a very seductive veneer of being a valid path, at 
least it did until 
the flaws in their pseudo-research were more recently exposed. A story such as 
his has 
become a common pattern.

Let's all wish Tomas godspeed in his realization and freedom from false 
teachings/teachers.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Diet and Immortality

2007-08-20 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, suziezuzie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I knew this guy in high school, an only child whose grandfathers
 developed Southern California, literally founded and built the entire
 city of Lakewood in the 1950s, 17000 houses, 20 schools, churches and
 a 250 acre shopping center. We fooled around alot, he being a great
 surfer and all around athlete. Well...into our early 20s he decided to
 become a radical vegetarian and convinced me to do the same, living on
 carrot juice, watermelons and California being the center of the
 health food movement at that time with health food stores popping up
 all over the place, it all made sense until about six months later,
 having dropped my weight by 60 pounds and muscle tone to nothing, I
 realize that I better start eating heavier foods and fast. Well...to
 cut to the chase, we went our own ways, me with TM, etc., and him
 continuing to drink and live on nothing but fruit juices, fruits and
 vegetables, all organic and produced locally of course. It's been
 twenty years since I've even spoken to this guy but it didn't surprise
 me when I happen to come across a picture of him and his mother on the
 internet the other day and noticed that he hadn't aged one bit, not
 looking a day over 35 and the guy was my age, now approaching 60 and
 here I am practicing the TM immortality technique and looking every
 bit my age. It's kind of haunted me for the last few days, wondering,
 even though we practice TM, if we really aren't exempt from aging the
 way everyone is. 

IMO, unless you are doing some sort of inner rasayana practice balanced with 
outer 
rasayanas, the benefit from TM is probably similar to people who take a nap 
every day. 
Even with that, I wouldn't expect such people to live any longer than the 90's 
and maybe 
crack 100. Several people in my practice lineage lived into the 130's and 
150's, but it was 
thru realization and deep inner practice that they extended their lives, not 
just a 
meditation practice.



[FairfieldLife] Re: TurquoiseB made me see - praise Iesus.

2007-07-16 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, emptybill emptybill@ wrote:
 
  Barry,
  
  Just to let you know, I really enjoyed reading your vignette about 
  searching in the dark alleyways of your medieval town. However, 
  rather than emailing you in the normal timeline, I have been waiting 
  to send a thank you. You did send me a teethy little reply to some 
  post I wrote a week or so ago, but I concluded that you were 
  actually quite bored since Judy was on time-out. Sorry I didn't 
  reply but I am unable to fulfill your pugilistic needs in the 
  manner to which you have become accustomed. 
 
 No problemo. I was just trying to point out that
 you were taking Vaj to task and challenging his
 statements in a thread to which he had never posted. 
 You never seemed to notice. 

Probably from his Kentucky rasayana dose.



[FairfieldLife] Jesus Camp

2007-07-06 Thread vajradhatu108
From another list:

analyze this
http://rapidshare.com/files/41054578/jesus.wmv

1. Klick rigth underneath on FREE
2. Type de code 3. download




A growing number of Evangelical Christians believe
there is a revival underway in America that requires
Christian youth to assume leadership roles in
advocating the causes of their religious movement.
This documentary, directed by Heidi Ewing and
Rachel Grady, directors of the critically acclaimed
The Boys of Baraka, follows Levi, Rachael, and
Tory to Pastor Becky Fischer's Kids on Fire
summer camp in Devil's Lake, North Dakota,
where kids as young as 6 years-old are taught to
become dedicated Christian soldiers in God's army.

Imagine a place where focused, precocious kids pledge
allegiance to a holy text and train as ideological warriors
- even, yes, martyrs. You're imagining America -
specifically, Kids on Fire, an evangelical madrassa
devoted to fomenting a religiopolitical Children's
Crusade. ''This world, all it feeds you is trash,'' says
12-year-old Levi. ''I want the meat.''

recensies:
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/jesus_camp/
http://www.metacritic.com/video/titles/jesuscamp

Cut to the flickering images of children writhing in a spiritual trance on a 
chapel floor 
while being hectored about the glory of dying for Christ, and one knows exactly 
where the 
first Christian suicide bombers will come from.
---
Jesus Camp doesn't just preach to the converted, it bores and frightens them
---
Evangelism's views on science and politics are so polarizing that almost any 
viewer, 
whether Orthodox, agnostic, or atheist, is bound to have an elemental reaction 
from the 
first shot of six-year-olds weeping in religious ecstasy.




[FairfieldLife] 09 F9 11 02 9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0

2007-05-29 Thread vajradhatu108
09 F9: A Simple Way to Stand Up Against the Latest Assault on Digital Rights
By Annalee Newitz, AlterNet
Posted on May 22, 2007

I have a number, and therefore I am a free person. That's the message
more than a million protesters across the Internet have been
broadcasting throughout the month of May as they publish 09 F9 11 02
9D 74 E3 5B D8 41 56 C5 63 56 88 C0, the 128-bit number familiarly
known as 09 F9. Why would so many people create MySpace accounts using
this number, devote a Wikipedia entry to it, post it thousands of
times on news-finding site Digg, share pictures of it on photo site
Flickr, and emblazon it on T-shirts?

They're doing it to protest kids being threatened with jail by
entertainment companies. They're doing it to protest bad art, bad
business, and bad uses of good technology. They're doing it because
they want to watch Spider-Man 3 on their Linux machines.

In case you don't know, 09 F9 is part of a key that unlocks the
encryption codes on HD-DVD and Blu-ray DVDs. Only a handful of DVD
players are authorized to play these discs, and if you don't own one
of them, you can't watch Spidey in high definition -- even if you
purchase the DVD lawfully and aren't doing any copying. For many in
the tech community, this encryption scheme, known as the Advanced
Access Content System (AACS), felt like a final slap in the face from
an entertainment industry whose recording branch sues kids for
downloading music and whose movie branch makes crappy sequels that you
can't even watch on your good Linux computer (you guessed it -- not
authorized).

When a person going by the screen name arnezami managed to uncover and
publish the AACS key in February, other people immediately began
reposting it. They did it because they're media consumers angry about
the AACS and they wanted Hollywood and the world to know that they
don't need no stinkin' authorized players. That's when the Motion
Picture Association of America and the AACS Licensing Administrator
(AACS LA) started sending out the cease and desist letters. Lawyers
for the AACS LA argued that the number could be used to circumvent
copy protection measures on DVDs and posting it was therefore a
violation of the anticircumvention clauses in the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act. They targeted blogs and social networks with cease and
desists, even sending notice to Google that the search engine should
stop returning results for people searching for the AACS key (as of
this writing, Google returns nearly 1.5 million pages containing it).

While some individuals complied with the AACS LA, in many cases
community sentiment was so overwhelming that it was impossible to
quell the tide of hexadecimal madness. Popular news site Digg tried to
take down articles containing the number, and for a while it appeased
the AACS LA. But Digg is a social network whose content is determined
by millions of people, and as soon as Digg staffers took down one
number, it would pop up in hundreds of other places. At last Digg's
founder, Kevin Rose, gave up and told the community that if Digg got
sued, it'd go down fighting. Many other sites, such as Wikipedia and
Wired.com, deliberately published the number in articles, daring the
AACS LA to sue them. Sites like MySpace and LiveJournal are also rife
with the number -- like Digg, these sites are made up entirely of user
content, and it would be practically impossible for administrators to
scrub the number out.

The AACS key protests have become so popular because they reach far
beyond the usual debates over copyright infringement. This isn't about
my right to copy movies -- it's about my right to play movies on
whatever machine I want to. The AACS scheme is the perfect planned
obsolescence generator. It will absolutely force people to upgrade
their existing DVD players because soon they won't be authorized to
play new DVDs. Even worse, the AACS scheme allows movie companies to
revoke authorized status for players. Already, the AACS LA has revoked
the authorized status of the WinDVD media player, so anybody who
invested in WinDVD will have to reinvest in a new player -- at least,
until that player's authorized status is revoked too.

The AACS, more than any other digital rights management scheme, has
revealed that the Hollywood studios have formed a cartel with
electronics manufacturers who will do anything to suck more money out
of the public. If you want to watch lawfully purchased movies, the
only sane thing to do is post the number. Stand up and be counted.

http://www.alternet.org/story/52242/





[FairfieldLife] Re: Breaking News

2007-03-18 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wayback71 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 You are right, Judy.  Lawson is very bright, from what I could gather.  He 
 can always return 
 if he wants to limit the number of posts as everyone else does.

It's a shame he could not get ahold of his obsessive posting tendencies, as he 
had a nice 
sense of humor and could be quite insightful at times.

I really think Lawson could benefit from a style of meditation which would 
offer attentional 
training and attentional stability and balance--although I suspect he'd be 
scared to death to 
try it.



[FairfieldLife] Re: The Danger of Samadhi

2007-02-26 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coshlnx [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 ---Re: Vaj says no Samadhi. 

No, actually I did not say that, although I did post an interesting article on 
wrong samadhi 
and it's dangers for discussion. It was not from a Dzogchen POV, but from a 
dude from the 
Thai Forest tradition.

 Actually, he's parrotting his Guru, 
 Chogyal Norbu Rinpoche, who disses internalized silent sitting 
 meditation; in favor of the Dzogzen direct cognition approach. The 

Actually, I've never heard ANY Tibetan or Buddhist lama diss internalized 
silent sitting 
meditation, esp. in Dzogchen where it's typical for such a student to be a 
master of sitting 
meditation IME. If you have a quote regarding this dissing, I'd love to hear 
it. It's certainly 
a comment which seems ignorant of how Dzogchen is actually practiced though, so 
I 
wonder if you're misinterpeting something you might have read.

In any event, you may want to re-read the little article on wrong samadhi, as 
it really didn't 
have anything to do with Dzogchen, but instead it was more from the Sutra style 
sitting 
school of meditation (shamatha and vipassana styles).

big snip of non sequitur material

PS: If you get more than one copy, my apologies in advance. Yahoo!'s burping on 
some 
messages. :-)



[FairfieldLife] Re: The Danger of Samadhi

2007-02-26 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, peterklutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  http://what-buddha-taught.net/Books/Ajahn_Chah_Dangers_in_Samadhi.htm
  
  Wrong samadhi is where the mind enters calm and there's no awareness  
  at all. ...the mind enters calm, and we don't want to come out to  
  investigate anything. We just get stuck on that happiness ...  With  
  right samadhi, no matter what level of calm is reached, there is  
  awareness. There is full mindfulness and clear comprehension.
 
 
 Last time you tried to make people believe the TM-Sidhi program is
 dangerous.

IIRC, that was actually what the Holy Shankaracharya Order said. I merely 
conveyed the 
message. Since that time more evidence has come force from that tradition as 
well.

 
 Now your warning against Samadhi?

Actually Peter, you should READ something before you post about. No, I did not 
write the 
article. It was an article on wrong samadhi.

 
 You are a self-confessed mason with a mission and I think there is a
 very strong need for you to come clean regarding what you are up to -
 what the end-vision for you work here really is? 
 
 There is currently a movement in this country to re-seed all
 religious traditions with universal tools of Gnosis via esoteric
 Freemasonry. I am a founding member of this movement.
 

Actually I am a Freemason; I am not a mason. And yes I have worked on 
establishing a 
gnostic 'common ground' for various mainstream religions to come together in 
the spirit 
of universal tolerance. It's not only been remarkably successful movement, it's 
been 
amazing to have the opportunity to meet so many different people from very 
different 
religious backgrounds. Getting various religions to appreciate the deepest 
common 
denominators they all share may be the only hope we all have for getting along 
together.



[FairfieldLife] Re: Never cut TM program

2007-02-26 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, martyboi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig sparaig@ wrote:
 
  Sez the man who has never had to take an ailing child to the hospital...
 
 
 According to SSRS, your children are your primary and most important 
 self-development program. Everything else is secondary. Sorta makes
 sense to me.


Great one. A big high five to Ravi for such great advice. 

A lot better than leaving your kids for months at a time with strangers.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Never cut TM program

2007-02-26 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, ffia1120 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 This reminds me of the nuns telling us that if we didn't go to church 
 on Sunday, we would burn in hell. It's very, very rigid thinking.
 
 I have not meditated in 8-9 years. I have a very sweet, happy, 
 successful life here in FF. Three of my dome-going friends are on major 
 anti-depressants -- the ones you see advertised non-stop on TV. Whether 
 or not you meditate has ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to do with whether or not 
 you are happy and successful in life. Period.


They might want to check out the kundalinicare.com people. Many, many people 
who 
practice the TMSP program have such problems, often due to unbalanced 
awakenings or 
blockages which will never resolve themselves by themselves. Many believe it 
will and if they 
just keep doing what they're doing, it will go away. In most cases, it will 
not. 



[FairfieldLife] Re: Kewl linguistic tricks of Diirghatamas, part 1 (version 0.01)

2007-01-10 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  
  On Jan 10, 2007, at 6:36 PM, off_world_beings wrote:
  

  
  Beautiful, thanks.
 
 
 So why did you call the transcendental field translation crap?


Because that's what it was: a pathetic marketing ploy to tie the then favored 
product, TM™, 
to an iapaurusheya/i text. Once apaurusheya-style texts were in place, all 
ya 
needed to do was push the yagyas. The buy me sacrifices. Don't worry, we're 
glad to 
store your cc #'s...

The history of the downfall of the TMO is a history of progressive exaggeration 
of a select 
bunch of Vedic verses and buzz-phrases.

Once you begin to grok Sanskrit and gain some distance from TMO, it'll hit ya. 
Don't 
worry!




[FairfieldLife] Re: Amma's Apartment for rent

2007-01-08 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


However, it seems to me that a saint carries his/her own vastu, and lives in
 a realm far beyond those considerations.

Never were truer words spoken!, but I have to add that it's the same for 
EVERYONE, you, me 
and all.

Amen.




[FairfieldLife] Re: Upcoming CIC Schedule, Costs

2006-09-27 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Om as in AUM?


Yes, that way you have perfect transition to GC and the development of refined 
senses, all in 
one program--or so the theory goes: TMSP = CC cultivation, A of E with mantras 
allows soma 
to flow into various celestial spaces, refining perception = GC cultivation. It 
seemed helpful in 
that regard. Soma mandala details the process you just went thru symbolically 
enlivening and 
awakening this as it unfolds. It's the key to GC.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: 'Maharishi Patanjali's Yoga Sutras'

2006-09-27 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I am wondering, why Maharishi just chose the sutras which he chose.

Experimentation presumably. Some sutras like the invisibility sutra were 
dropped early on 
when course participants actually succeeded. The story goes it could of been 
potentially 
embarrassing if these were known to a wider public. (So I was told).

 And also, if anyone has had experience with some of the other more
 advanced sutras which Patanjali mentions, or if a better translation
 would be needed to understand all of those concepts and  Sanskrit terms?

Yes.

According to Tat Whale Baba's tradition, ALL sutras need to be done and in 
Natural 
language, i.e. Sanskrit.

 
 Also, I wasn't there, but, why is this technique you mention called,
 'Age of Enlightenment' technique, just curious...
 
 If anyone knows of a good book of translation of some of these
 Sanskrit terms which are used in the study of transdencence and it's
 finer realities...
 R.G.

Have you read the official Shearer trans.? It's the best in regards to TM, 
although 
inaccurate  and apologistic IMO. There are greatly better trans. out there but 
they would 
have little relevance to TMers.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield Lite

2006-09-27 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
 tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
 
  Wow! The traffic is down so much I thought I logged into the wrong
  site. Thanks to all of you who have gone on the wagon for the week.
  It is a joy to be able to read messages instead of deleting 90
  percent of the useless traffic. This is almost heaven, AGAIN. Tom T
 
 The key word there is 'almost'. Actual heaven is the mind-blowingly
 delicious lunch I just made.


Well give us the recipe then!







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Fairfield Lite

2006-09-27 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vajradhatu108 vajranatha@
 wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Alex Stanley
 j_alexander_stanley@ wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
   tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis
   tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlist@ wrote:
   
Wow! The traffic is down so much I thought I logged into the wrong
site. Thanks to all of you who have gone on the wagon for the week.
It is a joy to be able to read messages instead of deleting 90
percent of the useless traffic. This is almost heaven, AGAIN. Tom T
   
   The key word there is 'almost'. Actual heaven is the mind-blowingly
   delicious lunch I just made.
  
  
  Well give us the recipe then!
 
 The vegetable was a butternut squash, peeled and cut into roughly 1
 cubes, and simmered in coconut milk with curry and saffron, salt to
 taste. But, not just a teensy bit of saffron. I buy really high
 quality saffron by the ounce (from http://www.saffron.com/ ), and use
 decadent quantities of it in a dish. 
 
 WARNING! NON-VEGETARIAN RECIPE AHEAD! 
 
 TOFU SHIELDS UP! 
 
 FIRE RAKSHASHA TORPEDOS!
 
 .
 .
 .
 .
 .
 .
 .
 .
 .
 
 I put four locally grown lamb chops in a pan with the juice of one
 lime, some finely chopped fresh rosemary from the greenhouse, and some
 crushed garlic. I cooked them over low heat with the lid on, turned
 them over, and cooked them the rest of the way with the lid off (to
 reduce the liquid). As much as I like lamb when it's grilled, I make a
 point of not subjecting food to high temperatures most of the time.


Wow, I'm not fond of lamb (haven't tried it in years) but this sounds great. I 
really like Thai 
food and I have spent years perfecting some of my favorite Thai dishes. It's 
definitely not a 
good idea to boil in coconut milk IMO, but a simmer is perfect. Sounds 
delicious Alex.

If anyone's interested I could share my authentic Pad Thai recipe as I have 
time. It's the 
real McCoy.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Vajra Sword

2006-09-27 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  from Stuart Davis' Blog ( www.stuartdavis.com )
  
  Vajra Sword
  Submitted by stuart davis on September 21, 2006 - 12:25pm.
  Song of The Day: Supreme People / Blackalicious
  Word of The Day: Cruciation / torment or torture
 
 Vajra Sword needs to get laid more often.


I could hook you two up, but I really thought Alex (aka John) was more his/her 
type...

:-)






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: Out of Texas, a Wordless Wonder

2006-09-26 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
wrote:

  Anyone heard these guys?
 
 Yes, and Brave Combo, Denton, Texas.
 
 Brave Combo: Rarely, if ever, has a band name been more apropos, not
 only at the group's inception, but even more so 26 years after the
 fact. At first glance, back in 1979, the Denton, Texas, based outfit
 was, in shorthand, pegged as a New Wave polka band, a courageous if
 not almost oxymoronic endeavor during that particular rebirth of the cool.
 
 Read more:
 
 http://www.brave.com/bo/


They remind me of Godspeed You Black Emperor! but mellower. Ever get to see 
Rev. Horton 
Heat? He's from down your way. I loved him on the soundtrack of Love and a .45






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Upcoming CIC Schedule, Costs

2006-09-26 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coldbluiceman no_reply@ wrote:
 
Dick Mays wrote:
  
Alexandria DeVasier 
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:42:09 -0500
To: Recipient List Suppressed:;
Subject: Information about the upcoming CIC's. 
   Could you broadcast asap
  
  Sure lest see..4 times each spaced 15 seconds apart.. samyama(just 
  like you think the mantra) on each
  Friendliness
  Happiness
  Compassion
  Strength of an elephant
  Bronchial tubes
  sun 
  moon
  pole star
  transcendence finest..hearing..taste..touch..sight..smell
  transcendence intuition
  Relationship body and akasha..lightness of cotton fiber.
  
  There I just saved everyone a boat load of cash..
 
 
 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coldbluiceman no_reply@ wrote:
 
Dick Mays wrote:
  
Alexandria DeVasier 
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 11:42:09 -0500
To: Recipient List Suppressed:;
Subject: Information about the upcoming CIC's. 
   Could you broadcast asap
  
  Sure lest see..4 times each spaced 15 seconds apart.. samyama(just 
  like you think the mantra) on each
  Friendliness
  Happiness
  Compassion
  Strength of an elephant
  Bronchial tubes
  sun 
  moon
  pole star
  transcendence finest..hearing..taste..touch..sight..smell
  transcendence intuition
  Relationship body and akasha..lightness of cotton fiber.
  
  There I just saved everyone a boat load of cash..
 
 
 I recommend the Gov/Purusha version on the hearing, etc:
 
 Purusha...Divine Hearing
 (...)
 Purusha...Divine Smell
 
 They just seem to give clearer experiences.
 
 Also nice are the special sutras: Soma, soma, soma after flying in
 shivasana and/or after the A of E technique.
 
 My other fav. sutras are  Word...Object Implied...the Idea Thereof
 Overlapping. and Moment and it's Sequence.  
 
 If you want to blow your friend's minds try the The appearance of the
 body sutra, apparently disconned.
 
 Have a Transcendental time!


Yeah they're great. I like soma, so that soma flows everywhere. Have you 
tried the Age of 
E. technique with the Om-based mantras? Sweet.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Dutch Newspaper Article on TM (rough translation)

2006-09-25 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, geezerfreak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 EVERYBODY ON A BIG PINK CLOUD
 By Maude Effting

`People are more gentile here', says Radboud Matthijsen,
 director of the building company. `but they are also less assertive.

Yes, it's true. You can be more gentile too with Maharishi Vedic Foreskin 
Reconstruction!

Yes, even men who were previously circumsized can feel closer to the Unified 
Field through 
Maharish Vedic Foreskin Reconstruction. Painful? Heck no! It's blissful. With 
our patented 
formulation of Ayurvedic herbs and specially pundit consecrated silk gags, your 
screams 
won't even be heard. Order now at the special introductory price of 10,800 
Raams. Your life 
partner will be glad you did. 

Experience the penetrating power of the Unified Field, just like Maharishi used 
to in the '60's!






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Dutch Newspaper Article on TM (rough translation)

2006-09-25 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, coldbluiceman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  vajradhatu108 wrote:
  geezerfreak wrote:
   EVERYBODY ON A BIG PINK CLOUD
   By Maude Effting
  `People are more gentile here', says Radboud Matthijsen,
   director of the building company.
`but they are also less assertive.
  
  Yes, it's true. 
  You can be more gentile too with 
  Maharishi Vedic Foreskin Reconstruction!
  snip
  Experience the penetrating power of the Unified Field,
  just like Maharishi used to in the '60's!
 
 And, what of the-- Maharishi Wedic Doeskin Supporter--
 for support of nature? (Doeskin-lined jock straps)


Maybe Walt Disney would let them use Bambi as part of their logo.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: the moon nakshatra and naming

2006-09-24 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, kaladevi93 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shukra69 stephen4359@ wrote:
 
  since it has come up twice recently, if anyone wants to find out about 
  this all details can be found in William R Levacy's Beneath a Vedic 
  Sky a good book about jyotish. He was an initiator.
 
 
 Most Jyotish programs will calculate this for you. Someone once told
 me where this comes from but I forget.


Hi Kala,

Yeah we had talked about this. It's from Dhavajadi and the A-Ka-Tha chakra 
therein, an old 
tantra.

-Vaj






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: The Domes Revisited

2006-09-23 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 On Sep 22, 2006, at 9:17 PM, authfriend wrote:
 
  Would somebody who gets these posts via email and
  can see Durese's complete email address post it here
  using workarounds to keep Yahoo from truncating it,
  please?  I'd really like to drop her a note
  complimenting her on this piece.
 
 You can find her on her Yahoo group, Fairfield Community Kiosk.
 
 Sal



Was she the one of the FF enlightened who failed the Fred Travis 
enlightenment report card? 
For some reason I was thinking it was her.

IIRC her list was originally set up as an antidote to the negativity of FFL.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: saaMkhya-yoga?

2006-09-22 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, cardemaister [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 I wonder if reading saaMkhya-suutras could clarify the 
 meaning of some of them yoga-suutras.

Study of Samkhya is considered the prerequisite for study of the YS, which 
otherwise will just 
be misunderstood.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




[FairfieldLife] Re: effortlessness (Hot Button Issue?)

2006-09-22 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

  (snip)
 I'm honestly curious. This effortlessness thang
   is obviously a *serious* hot button for both you
   and Judy. You both react as if you had been
   personally attacked every time it comes up...
 
 
 The 'Effortless Thang' is a hot button indeed;
 Indeed, once again you have found, single handily:
 The Hot Button...
 And why is it such a hot button, I am wondering?
 Well perhaps, it's because the whole notion of effortlessness;
 Until Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, came onto the scene;
 Was not a widely understood concept or belief...
 And still causes much confusion, as explified in your piece...


Actually this is a very ancient idea.

I just returned from retreat and one of the texts I took with me was _The 
Authenticity of 
Spontaneous Presence_ which deals explicitly with Unity Consciousness and 
contains a 
whole section on effortlessness. One of the criteria you can look for to see if 
the system of 
practice you are using is effortless is to see if it is based on the Two 
Truths, a relative and 
an absolute.

If it is, it cannot be effortless.

In regards to transcending, the Expansive Space Great Completion Tantra says 
the 
following:

Although the external appears as object
Clear, non-conceptual, and so forth,
Although the mind does nothing at all
It's charmed, allured by the taste of the transcendent, so
Eliminate just that internal superimposition.
This is clear.

Effortlessness cannot exist with a View that presupposes or works with two 
(truths) but 
only where Spontaneous Presence exists as Inseparability. This is 
epistemologically 
impossible where there is an overlay or superimposition as in the above quote.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: effortlessness (Hot Button Issue?)

2006-09-22 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vajradhatu108 
 vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robert Gimbel 
 babajii_99@ wrote:
  
(snip)
   I'm honestly curious. This effortlessness thang
 is obviously a *serious* hot button for both you
 and Judy. You both react as if you had been
 personally attacked every time it comes up...
   
   
   The 'Effortless Thang' is a hot button indeed;
   Indeed, once again you have found, single handily:
   The Hot Button...
   And why is it such a hot button, I am wondering?
   Well perhaps, it's because the whole notion of effortlessness;
   Until Maharishi Mahesh Yogi, came onto the scene;
   Was not a widely understood concept or belief...
   And still causes much confusion, as explified in your piece...
  
  
  Actually this is a very ancient idea.
  
  I just returned from retreat and one of the texts I took with me 
 was _The Authenticity of 
  Spontaneous Presence_ which deals explicitly with Unity 
 Consciousness and contains a 
  whole section on effortlessness. One of the criteria you can look 
 for to see if the system of 
  practice you are using is effortless is to see if it is based on 
 the Two Truths, a relative and 
  an absolute.
  
  If it is, it cannot be effortless.
  
  In regards to transcending, the Expansive Space Great Completion 
 Tantra says the 
  following:
  
  Although the external appears as object
  Clear, non-conceptual, and so forth,
  Although the mind does nothing at all
  It's charmed, allured by the taste of the transcendent, so
  Eliminate just that internal superimposition.
  This is clear.
  
  Effortlessness cannot exist with a View that presupposes or works 
 with two (truths) but 
  only where Spontaneous Presence exists as Inseparability. This is 
 epistemologically 
  impossible where there is an overlay or superimposition as in the 
 above quote.
 
 With all due respect, you are confusing effortlessness stated as the 
 goal of action with instructions given for meditation. 

Actually I am not. If it was non-dual, there would be no goal, there would be 
no inward 
stroke. That's like saying I had a non-dual visit to the supermarket, all the 
while ignoring 
you had to drive from your home and then return to your home after being one 
with the 
market.

 
 When Maharishi has spoken about the absolute and relative areas of 
 life, he has done so to explain what the adherent will do during 
 meditation. He could've just as easily started with the end result, 
 where there is no duality, but that doesn't provide any explanation 
 of the process.

This is incorrect on a number of counts. Never mind it's a known that 
yoga-darshana and 
samkhya-darshana are dualistic approaches as are any methods which rely on a 
support 
(e.g. a mantra, the breath, etc.). I didn't invent this. But your naivete in 
this area is also 
shared by many TMers, so you do have some company. :-)

If it was non-dual, there would be no doing.

Furthermore practice of TM relies on a principle known as the principle of 
increasing 
charm. Attention is naturally drawn to the transcendent. This charm constitutes 
a subtle 
form of delusion: the mind's attraction to something. This delusion constitutes 
an overlay 
or superimposition (to use Shankara's word for it). This is part of the reason 
that seeded 
samadhi is inferior to seedless samadhi--seeded samadhi relies of some action 
or process 
and it is tainted by that karma (or action). It's still caught within the chain 
of action. 
Patanjali and it's numerous supporting texts explain this fact in considerable 
detail.

 
 While it is important to understand the process in context of the 
 end result, it is easier to explain it as a duality, so that the 
 practitioner of the meditation understands that they are evolving 
 from one state to another. Otherwise the practitioner will either 
 get confused or lose interest.
 
 All spiritual practice tries to move the practitioner to the same 
 place.

It does? That's a new one!

 However it must be clearly explained how to get there. 
 Whether this is seen as a gradual clarification of one Reality, or a 
 linear path from the relative area of life to the Absolute is not 
 important. However we tend as human beings to learn things in a 
 linear way, hence Maharishi's explanation of the process of TM as a 
 process recognizing both relative and absolute areas of life (when 
 in fact the reality recognized when both are integrated is just one 
 Reality).
 
 To continually bring up the supposed dualistic nature of the path of 
 TM ignores the descriptive term inherent in TM: Transcendental. A 
 Transcendental practice is by definition non-dual.

No, to transcend implies a dualism. If it was non-dual there'd be nothing to 
transcend! :-)

And of course it is because of this duality that Shankara was able to defeat in 
debate all 
those of yoga-darshana

[FairfieldLife] Re: I Hate 55%off FFL Posts by Three Posters. Give them time-outs?

2006-09-21 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, shempmcgurk shempmcgurk@  
  If people don't want me here, just post that comment here on this 
  thread and if enough people do so, I'll be happy to leave.
 
 Thats your perogative to take an all or nothing approach.  But, of
 course, my suggestion was that posters try to keep within 10% of total
 posts. Otherwise to take a voluntary time out -- to regroup and
 reduce the urge for their compulsive jag -- and to form new habits, or
 if they are too compulsive to do so, an auto-trigger to give them such
 a rest.
 
 My premise is that when thoughtful posters sees pages and pages of
 Spraig/Judy/Shemp posts, they just slap their forehead and go away.
 Massive compulsive, drivel-prone, anger-spewing, peak posters drive
 away thoughtful posters.
 
 I susggest the following: 
 
 * If over the next week, 10 people stand up and say they don't like
 this majority of (peak) posts by three posters, and ask to you to
 attempt to limit it to 10% each (aka the kindely request), then will
 you earnestly try to do so?  
 
 * Same for Judy and Sparaig -- and others as they may arise over time.
 
 * If you are unable to control your urges to 10% of posts, will you
 agree to time-outs aka temporary suspensions to allow you time to
 regroup?. Lets say one week for the first time, two weeks for the
 second and subsequent times.
 
 If you (Shemp), Judy and Sparaig agree to this (in the next day or
 so), I will agree to the following:
 
 If 10 people don't stand up a make the kindly request, I will leave
 FFL. Thus illustrating that posters are driven away by a majority of
 posts by three people --  often drivel, anal-detailedness going
 nowhere, and ager vents, etc  IMO.
 
 I have participated regularly on FFL for four years. I no longer care
 to if I have to wade through such majority sludge as cited above. If
 nine others stand up make the kindly request, then I think FFL can
 regain its health, vibrancy and friendly supportive environment of the
 past. 
 
 If not, i think the trend, 40% === 60%  ?, of posts by a few
 posters will continue as thoughtful posters drop out of the sludge,
 and the compulsive sludgers contine to jag on. 
 
 Thus: 
 
 I invite all posters to make the the kindely request: 
 I don't like the majority of FFL (peak) posts being made by only
 three posters, and kindly ask to them to attempt to limit it to 10% each.
 
 Separate from the above, I invite all posters to consider taking a
 greener-pastures pledge:
 
 If 
 
 i) Judy, Sparaig and Shemp agree to the earnestly try to each limit
 posts to 10% of total, if 10 people take make the kindly request.  
 
 And if they are unable to do so , they agree to time-outs -- one
 week for the first time, two weeks for the second and subsequent
 times, and 
 
 ii) 10 FFL memebers as a whole don't support this initiative, that is,
 less than 10 make the kindly request within a week of i) occurring,
 
 then the member state their intention to move on to forums that are
 less clogged with posts by a small minority --- posts which often have
 a drivel, venting, or nonrespective content. 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 If several cycles of that doesn't work, I suggest that anyone can pull
 the stats and if someone is above 10% for a one-day or greater period,
 they are given a time-out for two weeks. Time-outs work for kids,
 and are hardly abusive. They help inform and provide feedback to
 people to help them get a grip. For compulsive, rude, or obnoxious
 for whom repeated group consensus to cool it' don't have an effect,
 then time-outs may be worth a try.
 
 I don't prefer the above time-outs. I prefer that 10 people stand up
 and say that they are sick of three people posting 50% or so of posts
 at peak times and ask them to please be become conscious of their
 effect of driving others away.
 
 Or we just start a new group, and don't give them the address. :)
 
 By the way, your stats are off.
 In Sept there have been 2841 posts. 130 by me. 4.5%. 6 a day.
 
 I like your idea of shooting for an average of 4. Some days, a bit
 more, some days a bit less.


I support the idea, I'd just make it three strikes and you're out. There are 
already a 
number of invitation only FFL spinoffs they don't have the address of...






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:

[FairfieldLife] Re: I Hate 55%off FFL Posts by Three Posters. Give them...

2006-09-21 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 good ideas take some time out  stop the incessant posting on non tm  subjects


 This isn't a TM list dude.  TM is a dead horse here which has been kicked, 
made into jerky, 
freeze dried, powdered, dehydrated and then recycled ad nauseum from the feces 
of the 
aforementioned.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Debbie henning -- keep anonymous

2006-09-20 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:
 
  sparaig wrote:
  
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote:

  
  sparaig wrote:
  
  
  [...]

  
  Who they? Annoop Chandola was taught to meditate by Swami Shantananda 
 Saraswati, 
  and he's under the impression that he learned TM or something extremely 
similar 
 to it.
  

  
  TM is not that unique in its process.  It is called yogic meditation 
  in other circles.   The actual use of the bijas particularly without OM 
  is what is considered unorthodox.
  
  
  
  
  From what I've seen of how people describe other purportedly simple and 
  easy 
 meditatio 
  techniques, very few are actually simple and easy.
  
  All that says is you haven't seen very much.  Hence my term 
  spirituality sheltered.
 
 
 That might be. However, one prominent exponent of the technique of Buddhist 
meditation 
 that Vaj characterizes as effortless admonishes people to be vigilant in 
 not letting 
 oneself fall asleep or getting lst in thoughts, which to me, is a form of 
 effort and 
control...


Actually--as with TM where an effort must be taken to sit down to meditate and 
close 
eyes, maintain mindfullness to return to mantra, etc., etc.--the first stages 
of Shamatha 
(which is what I assume you are talking of) do also require effort/attention. 
This is typical 
of most intro meditation techniques and McMeditation techniques like TM are no 
different. 
*Any meditation technique that relies on a object of meditation, a mantra, the 
breath, etc. 
will by it's very nature have some subtle effort (as Mahesh acknowledged at 
Estes Park in 
regard to TM).* The higher stages of Shamatha practice are truly effortless in 
the yogic 
sense of that word: one decides how long to rest in samadhi and then emerges 
from 
samadhi at the end of the session.

Unless you are actually familiar with the depth and breadth of meditation 
praxis 
experientially, this will not be obvious to you.

So your above statement is incorrect--spiritually sheltered it would seem.





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: effortlessness

2006-09-20 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 
 
 --- shempmcgurk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
  groups@ wrote:
  
   on 9/20/06 10:18 AM, authfriend at jstein@
  wrote:

Quoting an earlier post from Vaj:

At Estes Park Maharishi pointed out that there
  really
was some effort in TM. He quoted the Vedas as
  saying,
'Be easy to us with gentle effort.'

Obviously we'd need a great deal more context to
know whether Maharishi was using this quote to
describe TM as involving some effort.  Who is
  being
addressed in the quote?  It appears to be a
  request
of some kind, but who is making the request, and
of whom?  And how would one entity making a
  request
of another entity to be easy to us relate to
  TM?

   It related to TM. I was there. I had a feeling
  that Maharishi was
   experimenting a bit by bringing up the quote. He
  only mentioned it 
  in one
   lecture.
  
  
  
  On my TTC at the end when we learned the last part
  of the teaching, 
  we met with MMY and he asked us if we had any
  concerns before we 
  went into that final phase.  A fellow from France
  stood up and said 
  that he had a problem with his own meditation: that
  every time he 
  thought the mantra that he wanted to shout it out.
  
  After talking with him for a few minutes and sort of
  diagnosing what 
  the situation was, Maharishi said to him: okay, look
  at my arm.  I 
  want you to think the mantra every time I move my
  arm up.  And then 
  he started to, very slowly at first, move his arm up
  and down.  Then 
  he started doing it faster and then really fast. 
  And then he 
  started to giggle.
  
  I forget what the outcome of all this was and
  whether the French guy 
  was satisfied but what struck me was that in order
  to do what MMY 
  said to do -- think the mantra every time he saw
  MMY's arm go up -- 
  that effort was involved.  Now, I know that this
  whole episode was a 
  sort of clinic and all and it was all in context
  of this 
  particular person's unusual meditation experience,
  but that's what 
  struck me at the time: that MMY gave an instruction
  that necessarily 
  required effort.
 
 The problem is with the word efffort. It implies a
 focused trying which is not how you do TM. I think a
 better word would be intent. 

In yogic parlance, the word for effort is prayatna. Effortless, is
aprayatna.

Technically speaking any process of meditation, subject and object
which are transcended, will require a path and some effort, some
intention. The only thing that is truly effortless is *nonmeditation.*

Other things indicative of effort would be any mental process (e.g.
subtler and subtler levels of mentation till conscious mentation
stops), awareness of a mental object, any focus whether conceptual
or non-conceptual, allurement or charm towards towards a calm or
transcendent state, etc.


That's not to say effort is bad, is just part and parcel of
dualistic paths.

Reflexively authentic open awareness is not focused on any particular
object and this is why no effort is needed. Any consciousness by
necessity arises from causes, one of which is an object, even a subtle
object. Self-arisen wisdom does not need an object. In fact
effortless, nonmeditation requires *no subject or object.
*
(back to lurk mode)





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: effortlessness

2006-09-20 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, vajradhatu108 vajranatha@ 
 wrote:
  That's not to say effort is bad, is just part and parcel of
  dualistic paths.
  
  Reflexively authentic open awareness is not focused on any particular
  object and this is why no effort is needed. Any consciousness by
  necessity arises from causes, one of which is an object, even a 
 subtle
  object. Self-arisen wisdom does not need an object. In fact
  effortless, nonmeditation requires *no subject or object.
 
 You mention something called a dualistic path above, which 
 necessitates the existence of a non-dualistic path, which is of course 
 impossible, for who is on the path then?

Someone on a pathless path.

Paradox is the logic behind such a pathless path.

 
 So, even an effortless nonmeditation, where the goal is self-arisen 
 wisdom, is a practice distinct from daily activity, and hence, a 
 dualistic path.

Who said it was distinct from everyday activity? 

 
 What you have described above is a non-dual nonmeditation possibly 
 *within a dualistic path*, requiring effort to distinquish between the 
 nonmeditation used to bring about self-arisen wisdom, and all other 
 activity. 

No. It's a sudden approach as opposed to a gradual approach (e.g. 
Patanajali-yoga, 
Buddhist Lam Rim, etc.). You'll find an emphasis and insistence on 
effortlessness as 
hallmarks of sudden schools like Zen/Chan, Dzogchen/Mahasandhi, some Trika 
schools 
and so on.

 
 Only when we speak about our establishment in a non-dual state, and 
 the path existing *within* the non-dual state, is any practice of 
 meditation, or nonmeditation, or watching TV, or eating a meal, 
 dancing or sleeping, experienced as a non-dual path, within the non-
 dual state; A path of endless knowledge, existing within itself.

Now you're getting closer.

Ask yourself this question: if there is true effortlessness, could there be 
separation?

Effortless in TM spin was merely a way of saying it was easy. Later it became 
an 
amalgamated as part of the dogma--and we all simply believed.







To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: effortlessness

2006-09-20 Thread vajradhatu108
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 I'd put it this way, before enlightenment all is effort and 
 afterwards, by definition there is no effort.

In a pathless path one is directly introduced to the enlightened state *from 
the beginning*. 
Once one knows, in their own experience, what the mysterious object, the Big 
E is, one 
no longer remains in doubt. One applies the Fruit, the Big E,  *as the Path.*

IMHO this is what the vast majority of people who claim full enlightenment are 
beginning 
to grok--at different levels of integration--the Fruit applied as the Path. 
Bass ackwards, 
but works great.

As Mahesh Varma said to to course participants recently in regards to the 
question of 
whether people in the TM transmission had attained the Big E (grossly 
paraphrased): there 
are many who have awakened to themselves.

So this verifies my feeling. 

Of course I could have it all wrong. 

 I always found TM to 
 be easy, but never thought about whether or not it was effortless.
 
 Thanks for clarifying your message. now I can reread the original 
 and get what you are saying.


Gladly.






To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





[FairfieldLife] Re: Tantric Sexual Practices (was Urdhva-retas?)

2006-06-05 Thread vajradhatu108



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new_morning_blank_slate [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
 
  
  On Jun 5, 2006, at 2:46 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
  
   --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj vajranatha@ wrote:
   
On Jun 5, 2006, at 1:00 PM, new_morning_blank_slate wrote:
   
 What specifically have you heard? I never heard him mention 
   tantra --
 that I can recall.
   
A friend I know asked him directly about tantra, so I'm replying
based on that response.
  
   And what specifically was MMY's response. It had to be more than I am
   dismissive of that.
  
  It was not very approving.
 
 Not approving of real tantra or sexual tantra? 

Sorry, for some reason am not getting all messages, so responding on this weird web 
interface.

Tantra in general.

   I think your answer lies in 'what types and styles of tantric
   practice do we see aligned with the Shankaracharya tradition and the
   Advaita Vedanta tradition.'
  
   Well while it may not (or may) be part of the Shankaracharian
   tradition and the Advaita Vedanta traditions (Isn't Brahman which is
   EVERYTHING part of those traditions :) )
  
  Brahman in tantra? Find me a quote if you think it is.
 
 OK DOKIE. Perhaps my sense of references is out of whack, maybe not.
 Let my joke be made abundantly clear:
 
 Well while it may not (or may) be part of the Shankaracharian
 tradition and the Advaita Vedanta traditions (Isn't Brahman which is
 EVERYTHING part of those Shankaracharian tradition and the Advaita
 Vedanta traditions :) )
 
 If you are still reading that I am saying Brahman is in tantra,
 well what can I say. 

Yeah I got that, but the return joke is Brahman is more part of prissy Vedanta.

 
 I was making a joke via an indisputable tain of logic: Everything is
 in Brahman, thus tantra is in Brahman. And since Brahman is at the
 core of part of Shankaracharian and Advaita Vedanta traditions,
 therefore tantra must be part Shankaracharian tradition Advaita
 Vedanta traditions. :)

Yes I got that. The real joke is, it is not generally part of tantra.

 
 
   They postively and absolutley did not include union with the Goddess?
  
  Not in the teaching I received.
 
 But that is hardly comprehensive or conclusive. 

It wasn't intended to be, it *was* intended to be a window on the style of practice of SBS.

 
  
   And is 1000 Heaeded Purusha related to shankaracharian andavaitian
   traditions?
  
  Rig Veda, a famous quote I thought.
  
   They have sexual practices. Energol. Shake-up the energy
   etc. (clarifications from puruasha welcome.)
  
  Presumably to keep ojas from drying up.
  
  
   Some celibate sadhus seem to have sexual related rituals.
  
  Indeed they do.
  
   So you are absolutely positive that no practices from advaitain /
   shankaracharian tradition do not invole sex in any form?
  
  It's a renunciate trip dude. 
 It would also depend on what you mean by 
  any form. 
 
 I just gave several examples: 

Oh, those.

 
 union with the Goddess?
 Energol. Shake-up the energy
 
 
  In any event, you're getting off tangent here.
 Well I may be on a tangent for your train of thought. Not mine. I hope
 you see the difference.
  
  The person who there is the most evidence FOR using sexual tantric 
  practices with his disciples is probably Muktananda IMO. Not M.
  
  Of course there is Adi Da also.
 
 Which is fine. My primary hypothesis, which you have provided no
 evidence of substance to counter is that i) it is possible M. had
 knowledge of multiple, if not many real tantric practices, including
 the small subset related to sex and union and flows, and ii) its
 possible he expermiented or practiced such in his encounters,and iii)
 maybe it was raw sensual sex.
 
 If you have any such evidence that it was i) NOT possible M. had
 knowledge of multiple, if not many real tantric practices, including
 the small subset related to sex and union and flows, and ii) its NOT
 possible that he expermiented or practiced such in his encounters, and
 iii) OR that maybe it was NOT raw sensual sex, then provide away.


Once again, ANYTHING is possible, some things are more probable. It's highly improbable 
M. is a tantric adept, for the numerous valid reasons I've already given. But it would be 
helpful to have a clearer blow-by-blow description from one of the ladies involved. ;-)

One further comment. Most tantra which is of a sexual nature also requires a 
corresponding female adept, otherwise there is utter imbalance in the equation. Since 
there is no mention of these women being trained in such--quite the opposite, extant 
accounts seem to show more of a shock at the spiritual incest they endured.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  


[FairfieldLife] Re: Getting To Yes

2006-05-02 Thread vajradhatu108



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, tomandcindytraynoratfairfieldlis 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 TorguoiseB writes: snipped
 I sat there trying to not have as much fun with the 
 day as I knew I was capable of having, and then I 
 caught myself doing it. The moment I did, I was 
 able to laugh at myself. And through my laughter, 
 I found my body saying Yes. Out loud. Weirdest
 damned thing.
 
 Everything changed. Background flipflopped into 
 foreground and the witnessing, a moment before 
 unnoticed, moved front and center and reasserted 
 its Self again. And all it took was getting to 
 Yes. 
 
 I'm sure it'll pass...all things do...but it's
 neat while it lasts. Life's cool sometimes, yes?
 
 Tom T:
 Very astute observations. Reminds me of Patanjali Chapter 3 
 Vs 54: Knowledge born of the finest discrimination takes us to the
 farthest shore.
 It is intuitive, omniscient and beyond all divisions of time and space.
 Vs 55: And when the translucent intellect is as pure as the Self,
 there is Enlightenment.
 
 It is the Self knowing the Self but there is the working of the
 intellect that makes the final and finest discrimination.

Actually the above quote is about viveka-khyati --an important experience and 
discrimination which can continue for quite a while, but alas is not liberation--athough 
that is the next chapter (of the YS). It *is* often confused with liberation. The Self knowing 
the Self is still a ways off. You may have seen the man behind the curtain Dorothy, but 
there's still more to Oz than this.

 As to the
 cool stuff passing it is sometimes easier to think of it as
 aclimination to what is going on. If we aclimate then we have
 virtually no contrast and then the coolness is the ongoing day to day
 reality. It is my experience that all this cool stuff just gets more
 and more aclimated too and then we know it as our day to day everyday
 life. Enjoy. Tom

Interesting description of viveka-khyati. The self continues to present experiences to Self 
and more objects of awareness gain the slippery teflon coating of Love, eventually 
absorbed by Self.











To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








  
  
SPONSORED LINKS
  
  
  

Maharishi university of management
  
  
Maharishi mahesh yogi
  
  
Ramana maharshi
  
  

   
  







  
  
  YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS



  Visit your group "FairfieldLife" on the web.
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.