subject:"Re\: \[FairfieldLife\] Re\: Surviving Whole Foods"

Well, Obbajee, since I don't know exactly what THIS is, I can't really offer 
any insights. Oh, there's been a really bad jyotish thing happening. All the 
grahas between rahu and ketu. But that's easing up now. It has a name but I 
can't find it.





 From: obbajeeba 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 12:13 PM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Actually, Share, I had NO IDEA that SHANI RAHU SHUKRA could cause 
THIS!!
WTF and that is beyond IMHO!
More like WTF is this?!!
Share, please do tell what you know about this. I am sorry you are going into 
the sickness thing. I better count my lucky stars then. .HOLY GOD MOTHER OF 
JESUS!  

Catholics can be a bit um... PRAISE the LORD?
Please, Share, because this is not funny. Please give insight.
Details for which you are tempted to ask, well, let's say I need an Exorcism 
Intervention now!
Totally sober and not on any drugs or alcohol. Did not see this coming and I 
hope I make it to the other side alive. The other side of this conjunction of 
grahas force feeding me too much attention and too close to my living 
arrangements making convenience, a convenience. SOS



---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


Obbajee, I'm here but I've been avoiding the temptation to ask you for juicy 
details about Rahu/Sani with Shukra thrown in the mix. Surely you knew what 
THAT combo could indicate?! Guess it depends on which graha is graced by said 
combustible combo LOL. For a Libra lagna it's meant walking pneumonia with 
cough. Go figure!





 From: obbajeeba 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:04 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
IMHO, for which I have an IMHO, Barry is wet dreaming and he also cannot 
control who he dreams about even when he tries to google avatars and images on 
google to attempt the guess to what the girls look like who post here on FFL. 
IMHO and ROTFLMAO TMI and other acronyms I think Share loves to play and enjoys 
the attention here on FFL, IMHO.
Nice to see Emily, and I am getting used to this and may miss a subject from 
time to time or when I see fit, whichever happens. Takes me a bit to get back 
into this writing form, so I apologize for typos. Although you all are used to 
it. :)  
IMHO.
Where is my Share bear?

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


Ann, I thought about informing Share why her statement below is nonsense, 
backing it up with documentation, making her mad by using the acronym IMHO, but 
I'm going to start the day off on a different tack and say a little prayer for 
her.  I am thrilled however, Ann, that Barry said "buh bye," if even for a day. 
He sounded like he was about to wet his pants.  Bless you.  



 From: "awoelflebater@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:36 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


Judy, I don't know what you're talking about here. I thought the thread was 
about you obsessing on *if true* and ignoring all the great stuff Xeno wrote 
yesterday. What does turq have to do with it?! 

Oh dear Share, I think I noticed that there is another CD caught in your 
player. Maybe you should attend to that for the time being; you had some 
success yesterday extricating the one that was stuck. Maybe that or join the 
folks for some bananagrams at Revelations. Emily?





 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:13 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Barry is lying; everyone who has been following this knows he's lying. He knows 
they know he's lying. Even Share knows he's lying.

Somebody please explain to me what the point is. What does a person get out of 
lying when they know they aren't deceiving anybody? What do they get out of 
advertising that they're a liar, over and over again (six times, so far, in 
this case)? Why would they want to be known as a liar? And a  malicious liar, 
at that?

I've never understood this. What's the payoff?

(snip)

What you're missing is the delicious irony of all this.
The person who has called more people "Liar!" than 
anyone else in Internet history got peeved that anyone
would even infer such a thing about *her*, and threw
a tantrum. She declared that she would never have any
discussions with the offending person until he either
documented his inference or retracted it. He did 
neither, and in effect *thanked* her in advance for
no longer bothering him with her "

RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread obbajeeba

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread Share Long

Obbajee, I'm here but I've been avoiding the temptation to ask you for juicy 
details about Rahu/Sani with Shukra thrown in the mix. Surely you knew what 
THAT combo could indicate?! Guess it depends on which graha is graced by said 
combustible combo LOL. For a Libra lagna it's meant walking pneumonia with 
cough. Go figure!





 From: obbajeeba 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 11:04 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
IMHO, for which I have an IMHO, Barry is wet dreaming and he also cannot 
control who he dreams about even when he tries to google avatars and images on 
google to attempt the guess to what the girls look like who post here on FFL. 
IMHO and ROTFLMAO TMI and other acronyms I think Share loves to play and enjoys 
the attention here on FFL, IMHO.
Nice to see Emily, and I am getting used to this and may miss a subject from 
time to time or when I see fit, whichever happens. Takes me a bit to get back 
into this writing form, so I apologize for typos. Although you all are used to 
it. :)  
IMHO.
Where is my Share bear?

 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


Ann, I thought about informing Share why her statement below is nonsense, 
backing it up with documentation, making her mad by using the acronym IMHO, but 
I'm going to start the day off on a different tack and say a little prayer for 
her.  I am thrilled however, Ann, that Barry said "buh bye," if even for a day. 
He sounded like he was about to wet his pants.  Bless you.  



 From: "awoelflebater@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:36 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
 


---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


Judy, I don't know what you're talking about here. I thought the thread was 
about you obsessing on *if true* and ignoring all the great stuff Xeno wrote 
yesterday. What does turq have to do with it?! 

Oh dear Share, I think I noticed that there is another CD caught in your 
player. Maybe you should attend to that for the time being; you had some 
success yesterday extricating the one that was stuck. Maybe that or join the 
folks for some bananagrams at Revelations. Emily?





 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:13 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Barry is lying; everyone who has been following this knows he's lying. He knows 
they know he's lying. Even Share knows he's lying.

Somebody please explain to me what the point is. What does a person get out of 
lying when they know they aren't deceiving anybody? What do they get out of 
advertising that they're a liar, over and over again (six times, so far, in 
this case)? Why would they want to be known as a liar? And a  malicious liar, 
at that?

I've never understood this. What's the payoff?

(snip)

What you're missing is the delicious irony of all this.
The person who has called more people "Liar!" than 
anyone else in Internet history got peeved that anyone
would even infer such a thing about *her*, and threw
a tantrum. She declared that she would never have any
discussions with the offending person until he either
documented his inference or retracted it. He did 
neither, and in effect *thanked* her in advance for
no longer bothering him with her "discussions."

She went fuckin' CRAZY, first backpedaling to claim
that her statement didn't mean that she couldn't 
"comment" on his posts, and then set forth to make
several posts in which she addressed him directly
and tried to provoke a reply, clearly an attempt at 
"discussion." 

In other words, the person who *specializes* in 
calling other people "liars" on this forum PROVED
HERSELF TO BE A LIAR. 


I'd call that "fun." You, caught up in your Mean
Girl crush on the only person on the forum bitchier
than you, can call it whatever you want. :-)

RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread obbajeeba

Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread Emily Reyn

Ann, I thought about informing Share why her statement below is nonsense, 
backing it up with documentation, making her mad by using the acronym IMHO, but 
I'm going to start the day off on a different tack and say a little prayer for 
her.  I am thrilled however, Ann, that Barry said "buh bye," if even for a day. 
He sounded like he was about to wet his pants.  Bless you.  

 From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 8:36 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

Judy, I don't know what you're talking about here. I thought the thread was 
about you obsessing on *if true* and ignoring all the great stuff Xeno wrote 
yesterday. What does turq have to do with it?! 

Oh dear Share, I think I noticed that there is another CD caught in your 
player. Maybe you should attend to that for the time being; you had some 
success yesterday extricating the one that was stuck. Maybe that or join the 
folks for some bananagrams at Revelations. Emily?

 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:13 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Barry is lying; everyone who has been following this knows he's lying. He knows 
they know he's lying. Even Share knows he's lying.

Somebody please explain to me what the point is. What does a person get out of 
lying when they know they aren't deceiving anybody? What do they get out of 
advertising that they're a liar, over and over again (six times, so far, in 
this case)? Why would they want to be known as a liar? And a  malicious liar, 
at that?

I've never understood this. What's the payoff?

(snip)

What you're missing is the delicious irony of all this.
The person who has called more people "Liar!" than 
anyone else in Internet history got peeved that anyone
would even infer such a thing about *her*, and threw
a tantrum. She declared that she would never have any
discussions with the offending person until he either
documented his inference or retracted it. He did 
neither, and in effect *thanked* her in advance for
no longer bothering him with her "discussions."

She went fuckin' CRAZY, first backpedaling to claim
that her statement didn't mean that she couldn't 
"comment" on his posts, and then set forth to make
several posts in which she addressed him directly
and tried to provoke a reply, clearly an attempt at 
"discussion." 

In other words, the person who *specializes* in 
calling other people "liars" on this forum PROVED
HERSELF TO BE A LIAR. 

I'd call that "fun." You, caught up in your Mean
Girl crush on the only person on the forum bitchier
than you, can call it whatever you want. :-)

Judy, I don't know what you're talking about here. I thought the thread was 
about you obsessing on *if true* and ignoring all the great stuff Xeno wrote 
yesterday. What does turq have to do with it?! 

 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Tuesday, September 24, 2013 9:13 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Barry is lying; everyone who has been following this knows he's lying. He knows 
they know he's lying. Even Share knows he's lying.

Somebody please explain to me what the point is. What does a person get out of 
lying when they know they aren't deceiving anybody? What do they get out of 
advertising that they're a liar, over and over again (six times, so far, in 
this case)? Why would they want to be known as a liar? And a  malicious liar, 
at that?

I've never understood this. What's the payoff?

(snip)

What you're missing is the delicious irony of all this.
The person who has called more people "Liar!" than 
anyone else in Internet history got peeved that anyone
would even infer such a thing about *her*, and threw
a tantrum. She declared that she would never have any
discussions with the offending person until he either
documented his inference or retracted it. He did 
neither, and in effect *thanked* her in advance for
no longer bothering him with her "discussions."

She went fuckin' CRAZY, first backpedaling to claim
that her statement didn't mean that she couldn't 
"comment" on his posts, and then set forth to make
several posts in which she addressed him directly
and tried to provoke a reply, clearly an attempt at 
"discussion." 

In other words, the person who *specializes* in 
calling other people "liars" on this forum PROVED
HERSELF TO BE A LIAR. 

I'd call that "fun." You, caught up in your Mean
Girl crush on the only person on the forum bitchier
than you, can call it whatever you want. :-)

RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread authfriend

RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread authfriend

RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread authfriend

RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread doctordumbass

RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread authfriend

RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread authfriend

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread turquoiseb

Ann opines:
> 
> Bob Prices' later post which I just read before 
> bothering to respond to you is FUN. Maybe you 
> better go and read that a few times, Pinocchio. 
> Now that man can deliver and he often has his 
> facts straight. You don't want to mess with him, 
> and you know it. If you want to give me some 
> real FUN, I would love to see you engage him 
> one on one - go ahead, I really, really dare you.

Not gonna happen. Bob's a troll, and a grudge-
holding one at that. If you're looking for 
someone to knock you out of the #2 Bitch position,
he *is* a likely candidate, but I'm not gonna
interact with him. If that's your idea of fun,
you go for it.  :-)

RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread doctordumbass

RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread awoelflebater

RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread awoelflebater

Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread Emily Reyn

Yes, Whole Foods is in many places.  That article Barry posted from Huffington 
Post re: Whole Foods was hilarious, btw.  Richard, just read that and then let 
it go.  It's going to be O.K. Shop there as much as you like.  And, as far as 
Texas is concerned, I think Corpus Christi might be the only really tolerable 
town.  


 From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:23 PM
Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


> > Check out Ann, the bottom poster, and her reply to my
>> > post about home security! Good example of prejudice:
>> >
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/358450


On 9/22/2013 8:13 PM, awoelflebater@... wrote:
>
>> Ha, Richard, the guy who says he has to protect himself
>> from gays, transgendered men and women and lesbians (not
>> to mention skinheads). Who's the prejudiced one? But he's
>> right, I think I hate Texas.
>>
>So, you hate Whole Foods Market because it's a Texas company
>and I hate neo-Nazi skinhead bikers breaking into my house.

>
Er, what is Whole Foods?  We don't have them up here. Also, I never said I 
hated it or that I hated companies (presumably health food stores) that reside 
in Texas but seem to be chains all across the US of A according to FFL's recent 
posts. So are they really a "Texas company"? No, I just don't think I like 
Texas, the state, and I am thinking I don't like you much either. But don't put 
words in my mouth because I'm a stickler for misrepresentation and I'll drive 
you crazier than you already seem to be.

> 
>Go figure.

Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-24 Thread Emily Reyn

Dear Share, re: "Best simply to ride the wave and let it pass."  

You inserted yourself into the conversation between Xeno and Judy and made 
multiple (count the number, Share) posts to Judy demonstrating that you woke up 
on the wrong side of the bed (you might consider asking Barry to stop stealing 
the covers - perhaps you aren't getting enough sleep at night?).  Is *your* 
behavior, initiated by *you,* demonstrating what you state above?  

 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:22 PM
Subject: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

At a certain point on Monday morning, Xeno and Judy both seemed more light 
hearted about it and that is what I was enjoying. Nothing sadistic about that 
IMO. And I have noticed that these arguments do come and go on a regular basis. 
Best to simply ride the wave and let it pass.

 From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:08 PM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

It's not Share's fault that she doesn't understand the conceptual difference 
between the two - she has never tried to have a "discussion."  

I think Share (hi Share) is having a lot of fun with this and to me there is 
nothing that "fun" about it. She seems to be acting like it is not only a joke 
but is taking pleasure in the discord and adding to it in only the way she can. 
Barry is doing the usual which is to apparently not close his eyes to even 
sleep while there is a chance to "get" Judy and keep adding imaginary fuel to 
the fire. Xeno quoting Shakespeare is a small reprieve however. But I am 
sensing a tad bit of sadism in our dormouse, which I had not seen before. The 
fact that our alleged 'victim' of PR is "having fun" right now is revelatory.

 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Ok, Judy, you made a distinction between discussing with Xeno and commenting on 
what he said. Seems a bit hair splitty to me but there you are: different 
strokes for different folks. 

 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

FWIW, there was no "change of mind" on my part. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>>
>>
>>turq, even in Funny Farm Lounge, to change her mind is a woman's perogative. 
>>But I don't think of that as lying.
>>
>>
>>I'd have to agree with you here Share, but I'll take it one step further and 
>>say it is anyone's prerogative to change their mind without being branded a 
>>liar. Something as trivial as saying the equivalent of, "I'm not going to eat 
>>any chocolate cake because I'm on a diet." and then changes their mind after 
>>deciding it looks too good to resist is hardly someone to be reviled for 
>>having not predicted their future actions correctly. Now, speaking of cake...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: turquoiseb 
>>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:57 AM
>>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
>> 
>>
>>
>>  
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either 
>>>> dishonest or stupid. Then you go on to say TWICE 
>>>> that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a 
>>>> convoluted way that he's dishonest.
>>>
>>>All while having a discussion with the person
>>>she claimed only yesterday she was never going
>>>to discuss *anything* with until he either 
>>>documented something or retracted it. He
>>>did neither.
>>>
>>>And she thinks HE's dishonest? Chortle.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread turquoiseb

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, AnnTheClueless wrote:
> 
> I think Share (hi Share) is having a lot of fun with this 
> and to me there is nothing that "fun" about it. She seems 
> to be acting like it is not only a joke but is taking 
> pleasure in the discord and adding to it in only the way 
> she can. 

Sorta the way YOU do when you "pile on" to the "get
Share" fests, eh?

> Barry is doing the usual which is to apparently not close 
> his eyes to even sleep while there is a chance to "get" 
> Judy and keep adding imaginary fuel to the fire. Xeno 
> quoting Shakespeare is a small reprieve however. But I 
> am sensing a tad bit of sadism in our dormouse, which 
> I had not seen before. The fact that our alleged 'victim' 
> of PR is "having fun" right now is revelatory.

As you're doing right now, in fact.

What you're missing is the delicious irony of all this.
The person who has called more people "Liar!" than 
anyone else in Internet history got peeved that anyone
would even infer such a thing about *her*, and threw
a tantrum. She declared that she would never have any
discussions with the offending person until he either
documented his inference or retracted it. He did 
neither, and in effect *thanked* her in advance for
no longer bothering him with her "discussions."

She went fuckin' CRAZY, first backpedaling to claim
that her statement didn't mean that she couldn't 
"comment" on his posts, and then set forth to make
several posts in which she addressed him directly
and tried to provoke a reply, clearly an attempt at 
"discussion." 

In other words, the person who *specializes* in 
calling other people "liars" on this forum PROVED
HERSELF TO BE A LIAR. 

I'd call that "fun." You, caught up in your Mean
Girl crush on the only person on the forum bitchier
than you, can call it whatever you want. :-)

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread awoelflebater

RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread awoelflebater

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread awoelflebater

Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

At a certain point on Monday morning, Xeno and Judy both seemed more light 
hearted about it and that is what I was enjoying. Nothing sadistic about that 
IMO. And I have noticed that these arguments do come and go on a regular basis. 
Best to simply ride the wave and let it pass.

 From: "awoelfleba...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:08 PM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

It's not Share's fault that she doesn't understand the conceptual difference 
between the two - she has never tried to have a "discussion."  

I think Share (hi Share) is having a lot of fun with this and to me there is 
nothing that "fun" about it. She seems to be acting like it is not only a joke 
but is taking pleasure in the discord and adding to it in only the way she can. 
Barry is doing the usual which is to apparently not close his eyes to even 
sleep while there is a chance to "get" Judy and keep adding imaginary fuel to 
the fire. Xeno quoting Shakespeare is a small reprieve however. But I am 
sensing a tad bit of sadism in our dormouse, which I had not seen before. The 
fact that our alleged 'victim' of PR is "having fun" right now is revelatory.

 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Ok, Judy, you made a distinction between discussing with Xeno and commenting on 
what he said. Seems a bit hair splitty to me but there you are: different 
strokes for different folks. 

 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

FWIW, there was no "change of mind" on my part. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>>
>>
>>turq, even in Funny Farm Lounge, to change her mind is a woman's perogative. 
>>But I don't think of that as lying.
>>
>>
>>I'd have to agree with you here Share, but I'll take it one step further and 
>>say it is anyone's prerogative to change their mind without being branded a 
>>liar. Something as trivial as saying the equivalent of, "I'm not going to eat 
>>any chocolate cake because I'm on a diet." and then changes their mind after 
>>deciding it looks too good to resist is hardly someone to be reviled for 
>>having not predicted their future actions correctly. Now, speaking of cake...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: turquoiseb 
>>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:57 AM
>>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
>> 
>>
>>
>>  
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either 
>>>> dishonest or stupid. Then you go on to say TWICE 
>>>> that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a 
>>>> convoluted way that he's dishonest.
>>>
>>>All while having a discussion with the person
>>>she claimed only yesterday she was never going
>>>to discuss *anything* with until he either 
>>>documented something or retracted it. He
>>>did neither.
>>>
>>>And she thinks HE's dishonest? Chortle.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>

RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread awoelflebater

RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread j_alexander_stanley

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Richard J. Williams


According to the official store list, there are three Whole
Foods Markets located in New Jersey - not one of them is
anywhere near a Jersey shore, her neck of the woods,
according to Google Earth.

http://wholefoodsmarket.com/stores/list

On 9/20/2013 11:46 AM, anartax...@yahoo.com wrote:


Regarding Judy and Whole Foods (Whole Wallet). Based on what she has 
said, if true, I would say there is a Whole Foods within about a dozen 
miles (20km  approx.) of her location.



There's no privacy on the internet - they can find out
anything they want to know about you just by nailing
down the IP Address that you used to post this message.

Maybe she wants to keep a certain amount of privacy in not nailing 
down her location. I like privacy. Barry likes privacy (you cannot 
email him through the forum). The home I live in is not in my name; my 
telephone is unlisted (which unfortunately does not work for telephone 
scammers using war dialing). If she travels there or not and how and 
what kind of foods she likes to eat is for her to tell us or not. The 
distance figure I calculated, if the locations I used are correct, 
will be within 25% plus or minus about 12% of the correct value.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Richard J. Williams

 > > Check out Ann, the bottom poster, and her reply to my
 > > post about home security! Good example of prejudice:
 > >
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/358450

On 9/22/2013 8:13 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:

 > Ha, Richard, the guy who says he has to protect himself
 > from gays, transgendered men and women and lesbians (not
 > to mention skinheads). Who's the prejudiced one? But he's
 > right, I think I hate Texas.
 >
So, you hate Whole Foods Market because it's a Texas company
and I hate neo-Nazi skinhead bikers breaking into my house.

Go figure.

RE: Re: Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread emilymae.reyn

RE: Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread doctordumbass

Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

Emily, must you pick on turq so?!





 From: Emily Reyn 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 11:12 AM
Subject: Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
She looks at him like a "brother"?  Smile.  They *are* similar in certain ways. 
 



 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:59 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Emily observed with her usual sagacity: 

It's not Share's fault that she doesn't understand the conceptual difference 
between the two - she has never tried to have a "discussion." 

Good point. One would think, however, that even she would know better by now 
than to follow Barry's "get Judy" leads, but it's just hard--for me, at 
least--to fathom the depths of her cluelessness.





 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Ok, Judy, you made a distinction between discussing with Xeno and commenting on 
what he said. Seems a bit hair splitty to me but there you are: different 
strokes for different folks. 





 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
FWIW, there was no "change of mind" on my part. 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>>
>>
>>turq, even in Funny Farm Lounge, to change her mind is a woman's perogative. 
>>But I don't think of that as lying.
>>
>>
>>I'd have to agree with you here Share, but I'll take it one step further and 
>>say it is anyone's prerogative to change their mind without being branded a 
>>liar. Something as trivial as saying the equivalent of, "I'm not going to eat 
>>any chocolate cake because I'm on a diet." and then changes their mind after 
>>deciding it looks too good to resist is hardly someone to be reviled for 
>>having not predicted their future actions correctly. Now, speaking of cake...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: turquoiseb 
>>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:57 AM
>>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
>> 
>>
>>
>>  
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either 
>>>> dishonest or stupid. Then you go on to say TWICE 
>>>> that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a 
>>>> convoluted way that he's dishonest.
>>>
>>>All while having a discussion with the person
>>>she claimed only yesterday she was never going
>>>to discuss *anything* with until he either 
>>>documented something or retracted it. He
>>>did neither.
>>>
>>>And she thinks HE's dishonest? Chortle.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>

Re: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Emily Reyn

She looks at him like a "brother"?  Smile.  They *are* similar in certain ways. 
 



 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:59 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Emily observed with her usual sagacity: 

It's not Share's fault that she doesn't understand the conceptual difference 
between the two - she has never tried to have a "discussion." 

Good point. One would think, however, that even she would know better by now 
than to follow Barry's "get Judy" leads, but it's just hard--for me, at 
least--to fathom the depths of her cluelessness.





 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Ok, Judy, you made a distinction between discussing with Xeno and commenting on 
what he said. Seems a bit hair splitty to me but there you are: different 
strokes for different folks. 





 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
FWIW, there was no "change of mind" on my part. 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
> 
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>>
>>
>>turq, even in Funny Farm Lounge, to change her mind is a woman's perogative. 
>>But I don't think of that as lying.
>>
>>
>>I'd have to agree with you here Share, but I'll take it one step further and 
>>say it is anyone's prerogative to change their mind without being branded a 
>>liar. Something as trivial as saying the equivalent of, "I'm not going to eat 
>>any chocolate cake because I'm on a diet." and then changes their mind after 
>>deciding it looks too good to resist is hardly someone to be reviled for 
>>having not predicted their future actions correctly. Now, speaking of cake...
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> From: turquoiseb 
>>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:57 AM
>>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
>> 
>>
>>
>>  
>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either 
>>>> dishonest or stupid. Then you go on to say TWICE 
>>>> that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a 
>>>> convoluted way that he's dishonest.
>>>
>>>All while having a discussion with the person
>>>she claimed only yesterday she was never going
>>>to discuss *anything* with until he either 
>>>documented something or retracted it. He
>>>did neither.
>>>
>>>And she thinks HE's dishonest? Chortle.
>>>
>>>
>>
>>

RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Emily Reyn

Ha ha ha.  Project everything, take in nothing. 



 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:57 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Emily, happy to help. Are you enjoying yet? Look, Xeno's quoting Shakespeare, 
Judy's using fun words like biffle. What's not to enjoy? Just a matter of where 
you focus your attention. I think that's why you and I see different realities, 
both of which are valid.




 From: Emily Reyn 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Thank you for the kind thought Share, you are thinking kindly of me, no? - 
after my observation that you are incapable of grasping the main point of any 
straightforward post (you have now demonstrated my additional observation in 
that comment).    



 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Emily, I'm enjoying FFL at this moment. I hope you are too.





 From: "emilymae.r...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:39 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Share, I have written you many straightforward posts.  You appear to be 
incapable of grasping the main point of any straightforward post; you seem to 
realize there *is* a point, at which time you move always to derail the post in 
your own mind,  through posting on top of it with meaningless frivolity, 
nonsensical interpretation, or purposeful misinterpretation to avoid whatever 
reality is coming through to you that you want to reject.  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


What did I get? That you called Xeno dishonest in a convoluted way? But you 
claim to be the most straight forward poster!





 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:00 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Very good, Share, you got that at least. 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
>Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either dishonest or stupid. Then you 
>go on to say TWICE that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a convoluted 
>way that he's dishonest.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "authfriend@..." 
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:28 AM
>Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
>RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
> 
>
>
>  
>Xeno wrote:
>
>
>I did notice that you did not document a number of comments you made here. But 
>this response simplifies things immensely because if this is true, anything I 
>write to you here on FFL in the absence of my documentation here with regard 
>to these points or my withdrawing my comments here and earlier in the thread, 
>by your own words must stop you from responding if you do not wish to go back 
>on your word. Very Robinish!
>
>
>
>You are either very dishonest or very stupid. You made accusations which, if 
>they were true, you would be able to document. I made no such accusations.
>
>
>I don't think you're so stupid as not to have realized this.
>
>
>I said I wouldn't discuss anything with you unless you withdraw your 
>accusations (you can't document them because they're patently not true). I 
>didn't say I wouldn't comment if I found it appropriate to do so (e.g., if you 
>make any more false or insulting statements about me, I may respond to them). 
>But your accusations, as long as they're on the table, have effectively 
>foreclosed on the possibility of our having a friendly discussion of 
>"philosophy or science or music" or any other neutral topic.
>
>
>And that's not even a tiny bit "Robinish," nor are you so stupid as to think 
>it is.
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>>
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  
>>authfriend wrote:
>>
>&

RE: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

Emily, happy to help. Are you enjoying yet? Look, Xeno's quoting Shakespeare, 
Judy's using fun words like biffle. What's not to enjoy? Just a matter of where 
you focus your attention. I think that's why you and I see different realities, 
both of which are valid.




 From: Emily Reyn 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:53 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Thank you for the kind thought Share, you are thinking kindly of me, no? - 
after my observation that you are incapable of grasping the main point of any 
straightforward post (you have now demonstrated my additional observation in 
that comment).    



 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Emily, I'm enjoying FFL at this moment. I hope you are too.





 From: "emilymae.r...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:39 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Share, I have written you many straightforward posts.  You appear to be 
incapable of grasping the main point of any straightforward post; you seem to 
realize there *is* a point, at which time you move always to derail the post in 
your own mind,  through posting on top of it with meaningless frivolity, 
nonsensical interpretation, or purposeful misinterpretation to avoid whatever 
reality is coming through to you that you want to reject.  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


What did I get? That you called Xeno dishonest in a convoluted way? But you 
claim to be the most straight forward poster!





 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:00 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Very good, Share, you got that at least. 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
>Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either dishonest or stupid. Then you 
>go on to say TWICE that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a convoluted 
>way that he's dishonest.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "authfriend@..." 
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:28 AM
>Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
>RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
> 
>
>
>  
>Xeno wrote:
>
>
>I did notice that you did not document a number of comments you made here. But 
>this response simplifies things immensely because if this is true, anything I 
>write to you here on FFL in the absence of my documentation here with regard 
>to these points or my withdrawing my comments here and earlier in the thread, 
>by your own words must stop you from responding if you do not wish to go back 
>on your word. Very Robinish!
>
>
>
>You are either very dishonest or very stupid. You made accusations which, if 
>they were true, you would be able to document. I made no such accusations.
>
>
>I don't think you're so stupid as not to have realized this.
>
>
>I said I wouldn't discuss anything with you unless you withdraw your 
>accusations (you can't document them because they're patently not true). I 
>didn't say I wouldn't comment if I found it appropriate to do so (e.g., if you 
>make any more false or insulting statements about me, I may respond to them). 
>But your accusations, as long as they're on the table, have effectively 
>foreclosed on the possibility of our having a friendly discussion of 
>"philosophy or science or music" or any other neutral topic.
>
>
>And that's not even a tiny bit "Robinish," nor are you so stupid as to think 
>it is.
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>>
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  
>>authfriend wrote:
>>
>>
>>Xeno wrote: 
>>
>>Authfriend wrote: 'For, what, the sixth time, what was the basis for your 
>>suspicion that what I had written was a lie?' 
>>
>>
>>You seem to be looking for a response from me of the form J says x but y is 
>>true.
>>
>>
>>I am l

RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Emily Reyn

It's not Share's fault that she doesn't understand the conceptual difference 
between the two - she has never tried to have a "discussion."  



 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:51 AM
Subject: Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Ok, Judy, you made a distinction between discussing with Xeno and commenting on 
what he said. Seems a bit hair splitty to me but there you are: different 
strokes for different folks. 





 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
FWIW, there was no "change of mind" on my part. 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
>turq, even in Funny Farm Lounge, to change her mind is a woman's perogative. 
>But I don't think of that as lying.
>
>
>I'd have to agree with you here Share, but I'll take it one step further and 
>say it is anyone's prerogative to change their mind without being branded a 
>liar. Something as trivial as saying the equivalent of, "I'm not going to eat 
>any chocolate cake because I'm on a diet." and then changes their mind after 
>deciding it looks too good to resist is hardly someone to be reviled for 
>having not predicted their future actions correctly. Now, speaking of cake...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>________________
> From: turquoiseb 
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:57 AM
>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
> 
>
>
>  
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>>>
>>> Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either 
>>> dishonest or stupid. Then you go on to say TWICE 
>>> that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a 
>>> convoluted way that he's dishonest.
>>
>>All while having a discussion with the person
>>she claimed only yesterday she was never going
>>to discuss *anything* with until he either 
>>documented something or retracted it. He
>>did neither.
>>
>>And she thinks HE's dishonest? Chortle.
>>
>>
>
>

Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Emily Reyn

Thank you for the kind thought Share, you are thinking kindly of me, no? - 
after my observation that you are incapable of grasping the main point of any 
straightforward post (you have now demonstrated my additional observation in 
that comment).    



 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:43 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Emily, I'm enjoying FFL at this moment. I hope you are too.





 From: "emilymae.r...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:39 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Share, I have written you many straightforward posts.  You appear to be 
incapable of grasping the main point of any straightforward post; you seem to 
realize there *is* a point, at which time you move always to derail the post in 
your own mind,  through posting on top of it with meaningless frivolity, 
nonsensical interpretation, or purposeful misinterpretation to avoid whatever 
reality is coming through to you that you want to reject.  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


What did I get? That you called Xeno dishonest in a convoluted way? But you 
claim to be the most straight forward poster!





 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:00 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Very good, Share, you got that at least. 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
>Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either dishonest or stupid. Then you 
>go on to say TWICE that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a convoluted 
>way that he's dishonest.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "authfriend@..." 
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:28 AM
>Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
>RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
> 
>
>
>  
>Xeno wrote:
>
>
>I did notice that you did not document a number of comments you made here. But 
>this response simplifies things immensely because if this is true, anything I 
>write to you here on FFL in the absence of my documentation here with regard 
>to these points or my withdrawing my comments here and earlier in the thread, 
>by your own words must stop you from responding if you do not wish to go back 
>on your word. Very Robinish!
>
>
>
>You are either very dishonest or very stupid. You made accusations which, if 
>they were true, you would be able to document. I made no such accusations.
>
>
>I don't think you're so stupid as not to have realized this.
>
>
>I said I wouldn't discuss anything with you unless you withdraw your 
>accusations (you can't document them because they're patently not true). I 
>didn't say I wouldn't comment if I found it appropriate to do so (e.g., if you 
>make any more false or insulting statements about me, I may respond to them). 
>But your accusations, as long as they're on the table, have effectively 
>foreclosed on the possibility of our having a friendly discussion of 
>"philosophy or science or music" or any other neutral topic.
>
>
>And that's not even a tiny bit "Robinish," nor are you so stupid as to think 
>it is.
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>>
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  
>>authfriend wrote:
>>
>>
>>Xeno wrote: 
>>
>>Authfriend wrote: 'For, what, the sixth time, what was the basis for your 
>>suspicion that what I had written was a lie?' 
>>
>>
>>You seem to be looking for a response from me of the form J says x but y is 
>>true.
>>
>>
>>I am looking for an explanation of why you think this.
>>
>>
>>But it is not a specific fact that makes me come to my conclusion. It is 
>>rather your pattern of deviousness
>>
>>
>>OK, stop right there and document that I have a "pattern of deviousness," 
>>with examples.
>>
>>
>>I am not devious, I am as straightforward as it gets, so it's going to be 
>>pretty difficult.
>>
>>
>>and extended argumentation, which is an intuitive and subjective evaluation 
>>by wh

Re: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

Ok, Judy, you made a distinction between discussing with Xeno and commenting on 
what he said. Seems a bit hair splitty to me but there you are: different 
strokes for different folks. 





 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:23 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
FWIW, there was no "change of mind" on my part. 


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
>turq, even in Funny Farm Lounge, to change her mind is a woman's perogative. 
>But I don't think of that as lying.
>
>
>I'd have to agree with you here Share, but I'll take it one step further and 
>say it is anyone's prerogative to change their mind without being branded a 
>liar. Something as trivial as saying the equivalent of, "I'm not going to eat 
>any chocolate cake because I'm on a diet." and then changes their mind after 
>deciding it looks too good to resist is hardly someone to be reviled for 
>having not predicted their future actions correctly. Now, speaking of cake...
>
>
>
>
>
>
>________
> From: turquoiseb 
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:57 AM
>Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
> 
>
>
>  
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>>>
>>> Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either 
>>> dishonest or stupid. Then you go on to say TWICE 
>>> that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a 
>>> convoluted way that he's dishonest.
>>
>>All while having a discussion with the person
>>she claimed only yesterday she was never going
>>to discuss *anything* with until he either 
>>documented something or retracted it. He
>>did neither.
>>
>>And she thinks HE's dishonest? Chortle.
>>
>>
>
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Bhairitu

What!  No review of the next to last episode of "Breaking Bad"?  Or the 
finale episode of "Dexter"? Where are your priorities?  Who gives a shit 
about a bunch of piddling people piddling over who said what about Whole 
Foods?

I tell you what, the next article on TM in the MSM where comments are 
available I'm going to point to FFL as an example for people to visit 
and see how TMers behave. :-P

On 09/23/2013 06:40 AM, turquoiseb wrote:

At 11:53pm yesterday (my time) Judy wrote to Xeno:
>
> Why don't you fuck off? I'm not going to discuss anything
> with you until you've documented your accusations, or
> withdrawn them.

At 5:38am today (my time) Xeno made it clear that he was
not going to do either, and thus expected Judy to keep her
word and cease all attempts to have discussions with him:
>
> I did notice that you did not document a number of comments
> you made here. But this response simplifies things immensely
> because if this is true, anything I write to you here on
> FFL in the absence of my documentation here with regard to
> these points or my withdrawing my comments here and earlier
> in the thread, by your own words must stop you from responding
> if you do not wish to go back on your word. Very Robinish!

At 2:28 today (my time), Judy broke her word and wrote to
Xeno *directly*, after claiming she wouldn't, addressing
him directly and calling him "either very dishonest or very
stupid."

In other words, having realized the bind she'd placed herself
in, she backpedalled like crazy and claimed that she'd never
said she wouldn't "comment" on things he posted. She's NOT
"commenting" in this later reply, she's addressing Xeno
*directly*, and thus attempting to have a discussion with
him, the very thing she said she'd not do unless he did
what she wanted.

In other words, Judy *LIED*.

In "Judyworld," addressing a person directly, calling them
names, and attempting anything she can possibly think of to
lure them back into an argument is NOT "discussing" things
with them. Doing this with someone who had made it clear
that he was *happy* that she will no longer be attempting to
discuss things with him is -- in her mind -- NOT "discussing"
things with him. It's something else.

Insanity, maybe?  :-)  :-)  :-)

Xeno wrote:

*I did notice that you did not document a number of comments you made 
here. But this response simplifies things immensely because if this is 
true, anything I write to you here on FFL in the absence of my 
documentation here with regard to these points or my withdrawing my 
comments here and earlier in the thread, by your own words must stop 
you from responding if you do not wish to go back on your word. Very 
Robinish!*

You are either very dishonest or very stupid. You made accusations 
which, if they were true, you would be able to document. I made no 
such accusations.

I don't think you're so stupid as not to have realized this.

I said I wouldn't discuss anything with you unless you withdraw your 
accusations (you can't document them because they're patently not 
true). I didn't say I wouldn't comment if I found it appropriate to do 
so (e.g., if you make any more false or insulting statements about me, 
I may respond to them). But your accusations, as long as they're on 
the table, have effectively foreclosed on the possibility of our 
having a friendly discussion of "philosophy or science or music" or 
any other neutral topic.

And that's not even a tiny bit "Robinish," nor are you so stupid as to 
think it is.

RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

Re: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

Emily, I'm enjoying FFL at this moment. I hope you are too.





 From: "emilymae.r...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:39 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Share, I have written you many straightforward posts.  You appear to be 
incapable of grasping the main point of any straightforward post; you seem to 
realize there *is* a point, at which time you move always to derail the post in 
your own mind,  through posting on top of it with meaningless frivolity, 
nonsensical interpretation, or purposeful misinterpretation to avoid whatever 
reality is coming through to you that you want to reject.  


--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:


What did I get? That you called Xeno dishonest in a convoluted way? But you 
claim to be the most straight forward poster!





 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:00 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Very good, Share, you got that at least. 



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
>Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either dishonest or stupid. Then you 
>go on to say TWICE that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a convoluted 
>way that he's dishonest.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "authfriend@..." 
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:28 AM
>Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
>RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
> 
>
>
>  
>Xeno wrote:
>
>
>I did notice that you did not document a number of comments you made here. But 
>this response simplifies things immensely because if this is true, anything I 
>write to you here on FFL in the absence of my documentation here with regard 
>to these points or my withdrawing my comments here and earlier in the thread, 
>by your own words must stop you from responding if you do not wish to go back 
>on your word. Very Robinish!
>
>
>
>You are either very dishonest or very stupid. You made accusations which, if 
>they were true, you would be able to document. I made no such accusations.
>
>
>I don't think you're so stupid as not to have realized this.
>
>
>I said I wouldn't discuss anything with you unless you withdraw your 
>accusations (you can't document them because they're patently not true). I 
>didn't say I wouldn't comment if I found it appropriate to do so (e.g., if you 
>make any more false or insulting statements about me, I may respond to them). 
>But your accusations, as long as they're on the table, have effectively 
>foreclosed on the possibility of our having a friendly discussion of 
>"philosophy or science or music" or any other neutral topic.
>
>
>And that's not even a tiny bit "Robinish," nor are you so stupid as to think 
>it is.
>
>
>
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>>
>>
>> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  
>>authfriend wrote:
>>
>>
>>Xeno wrote: 
>>
>>Authfriend wrote: 'For, what, the sixth time, what was the basis for your 
>>suspicion that what I had written was a lie?' 
>>
>>
>>You seem to be looking for a response from me of the form J says x but y is 
>>true.
>>
>>
>>I am looking for an explanation of why you think this.
>>
>>
>>But it is not a specific fact that makes me come to my conclusion. It is 
>>rather your pattern of deviousness
>>
>>
>>OK, stop right there and document that I have a "pattern of deviousness," 
>>with examples.
>>
>>
>>I am not devious, I am as straightforward as it gets, so it's going to be 
>>pretty difficult.
>>
>>
>>and extended argumentation, which is an intuitive and subjective evaluation 
>>by which I come to this conclusion. You kind of remind me of the tenant 
>>portrayed by Michael Keaton the movie 'Pacific Heights'. You begin with the 
>>appearance of being on the level, and then
>>
>>
>>Wikipedia:
>>In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by 
>>starting arguments
>>
>>
>>I have been known to start an argument. So have you, so have many others 
>>here. Since when is this a sign of "a pattern of deviousness"

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Emily Reyn

Check yourself Share - it's only Monday.  Did you have a hard weekend?  Walk 
away from the computer, Share, walk away from the computer.  

 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:38 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Emily, join in the fun, why don't you? 

 From: Emily Reyn 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Share, you need to learn how to process your own emotions - you are bleeding 
heavily again.  Does meditation help you with this?  Did you meditate before 
you launched your brain on FFL this morning?  Did you have a cup of coffee (one 
of the super foods in the article you posted the other day that I got a good 
laugh at)? What *are* you trying to achieve here this morning?  Ask yourself 
this.  

 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Dudy, you told ME not to waste YOUR time! Duh! How can I possibly waste YOUR 
time?! As Spock would say: your logic is weak.

 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Share tried a blather instead of a blither: 

I have no control over which posts of mine you read, Judy, ergo I have no 
control over how you spend your time on FFL. 

I don't believe I said you did, Share.

What you do have control over is whether you ask stupid questions.

Oh, wait...

 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Share, if you want to know what I'm saying, go back and read the exchange from 
the beginning, because I've said it all there already. Don't waste my time with 
stupid questions, please.

And I'm not the least bit interested in how things "seem" to you. As you may 
have noticed, I don't exactly hold your ability to evaluate what happens on FFL 
in high esteem.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
>Judy, are you saying that Xeno accused you of lying twice?! Once with *if 
>true* and once about Whole Foods?! Xeno's intention seemed friendly to me even 
>tho he got it wrong about your alleged desire for privacy. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "authfriend@..." 
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:00 AM
>Subject: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
>RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
> 
>
>
>  
>BTW, Share, another thing you missed is that there was no "desire for privacy" 
>on my part in my exchange with Richard; that was purely Xeno's notion. As I 
>explained to Xeno, Richard already knew where I live, because I've mentioned 
>it here before. And because Richard had looked up the locations of Whole Foods 
>stores in New Jersey, he knew there was one quite close to me (he even posted 
>the address).
>
>
>My point was Richard's flagrant dishonesty in (among other things) claiming 
>the nearest one was "a long bus ride" and "two hours" distant. It was one of 
>his stupid and petty attempts at trolling. It didn't warrant any discussion 
>other than as a way of highlighting Richard's behavior here. There was no 
>reason for Xeno to intervene; although it became clear later why he did: to 
>suggest that I might be the one who was lying. Ironically, that was also a 
>stupid and dishonest troll on Xeno's part.
>
>Share wrote: 
>
>
>
>Judy, right before this argument, Xeno defended you and your desire for 
>privacy to Richard with regards to Whole Foods. 
>
>

RE: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread emilymae.reyn

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

Emily, join in the fun, why don't you? 

 From: Emily Reyn 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:24 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Share, you need to learn how to process your own emotions - you are bleeding 
heavily again.  Does meditation help you with this?  Did you meditate before 
you launched your brain on FFL this morning?  Did you have a cup of coffee (one 
of the super foods in the article you posted the other day that I got a good 
laugh at)? What *are* you trying to achieve here this morning?  Ask yourself 
this.  

 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Dudy, you told ME not to waste YOUR time! Duh! How can I possibly waste YOUR 
time?! As Spock would say: your logic is weak.

 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Share tried a blather instead of a blither: 

I have no control over which posts of mine you read, Judy, ergo I have no 
control over how you spend your time on FFL. 

I don't believe I said you did, Share.

What you do have control over is whether you ask stupid questions.

Oh, wait...

 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Share, if you want to know what I'm saying, go back and read the exchange from 
the beginning, because I've said it all there already. Don't waste my time with 
stupid questions, please.

And I'm not the least bit interested in how things "seem" to you. As you may 
have noticed, I don't exactly hold your ability to evaluate what happens on FFL 
in high esteem.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
>Judy, are you saying that Xeno accused you of lying twice?! Once with *if 
>true* and once about Whole Foods?! Xeno's intention seemed friendly to me even 
>tho he got it wrong about your alleged desire for privacy. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "authfriend@..." 
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:00 AM
>Subject: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
>RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
> 
>
>
>  
>BTW, Share, another thing you missed is that there was no "desire for privacy" 
>on my part in my exchange with Richard; that was purely Xeno's notion. As I 
>explained to Xeno, Richard already knew where I live, because I've mentioned 
>it here before. And because Richard had looked up the locations of Whole Foods 
>stores in New Jersey, he knew there was one quite close to me (he even posted 
>the address).
>
>
>My point was Richard's flagrant dishonesty in (among other things) claiming 
>the nearest one was "a long bus ride" and "two hours" distant. It was one of 
>his stupid and petty attempts at trolling. It didn't warrant any discussion 
>other than as a way of highlighting Richard's behavior here. There was no 
>reason for Xeno to intervene; although it became clear later why he did: to 
>suggest that I might be the one who was lying. Ironically, that was also a 
>stupid and dishonest troll on Xeno's part.
>
>Share wrote: 
>
>
>
>Judy, right before this argument, Xeno defended you and your desire for 
>privacy to Richard with regards to Whole Foods. 
>
>

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Emily Reyn

Share, you need to learn how to process your own emotions - you are bleeding 
heavily again.  Does meditation help you with this?  Did you meditate before 
you launched your brain on FFL this morning?  Did you have a cup of coffee (one 
of the super foods in the article you posted the other day that I got a good 
laugh at)? What *are* you trying to achieve here this morning?  Ask yourself 
this.  

 From: Share Long 
To: "FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com"  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:19 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Dudy, you told ME not to waste YOUR time! Duh! How can I possibly waste YOUR 
time?! As Spock would say: your logic is weak.

 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Share tried a blather instead of a blither: 

I have no control over which posts of mine you read, Judy, ergo I have no 
control over how you spend your time on FFL. 

I don't believe I said you did, Share.

What you do have control over is whether you ask stupid questions.

Oh, wait...

 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Share, if you want to know what I'm saying, go back and read the exchange from 
the beginning, because I've said it all there already. Don't waste my time with 
stupid questions, please.

And I'm not the least bit interested in how things "seem" to you. As you may 
have noticed, I don't exactly hold your ability to evaluate what happens on FFL 
in high esteem.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
>Judy, are you saying that Xeno accused you of lying twice?! Once with *if 
>true* and once about Whole Foods?! Xeno's intention seemed friendly to me even 
>tho he got it wrong about your alleged desire for privacy. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "authfriend@..." 
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:00 AM
>Subject: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
>RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
> 
>
>
>  
>BTW, Share, another thing you missed is that there was no "desire for privacy" 
>on my part in my exchange with Richard; that was purely Xeno's notion. As I 
>explained to Xeno, Richard already knew where I live, because I've mentioned 
>it here before. And because Richard had looked up the locations of Whole Foods 
>stores in New Jersey, he knew there was one quite close to me (he even posted 
>the address).
>
>
>My point was Richard's flagrant dishonesty in (among other things) claiming 
>the nearest one was "a long bus ride" and "two hours" distant. It was one of 
>his stupid and petty attempts at trolling. It didn't warrant any discussion 
>other than as a way of highlighting Richard's behavior here. There was no 
>reason for Xeno to intervene; although it became clear later why he did: to 
>suggest that I might be the one who was lying. Ironically, that was also a 
>stupid and dishonest troll on Xeno's part.
>
>Share wrote: 
>
>
>
>Judy, right before this argument, Xeno defended you and your desire for 
>privacy to Richard with regards to Whole Foods. 
>
>

RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread awoelflebater

Re: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

Dudy, you told ME not to waste YOUR time! Duh! How can I possibly waste YOUR 
time?! As Spock would say: your logic is weak.





 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:12 AM
Subject: RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Share tried a blather instead of a blither: 


I have no control over which posts of mine you read, Judy, ergo I have no 
control over how you spend your time on FFL. 


I don't believe I said you did, Share.

What you do have control over is whether you ask stupid questions.

Oh, wait...




 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Share, if you want to know what I'm saying, go back and read the exchange from 
the beginning, because I've said it all there already. Don't waste my time with 
stupid questions, please.

And I'm not the least bit interested in how things "seem" to you. As you may 
have noticed, I don't exactly hold your ability to evaluate what happens on FFL 
in high esteem.



--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
>Judy, are you saying that Xeno accused you of lying twice?! Once with *if 
>true* and once about Whole Foods?! Xeno's intention seemed friendly to me even 
>tho he got it wrong about your alleged desire for privacy. 
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> From: "authfriend@..." 
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:00 AM
>Subject: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
>RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
> 
>
>
>  
>BTW, Share, another thing you missed is that there was no "desire for privacy" 
>on my part in my exchange with Richard; that was purely Xeno's notion. As I 
>explained to Xeno, Richard already knew where I live, because I've mentioned 
>it here before. And because Richard had looked up the locations of Whole Foods 
>stores in New Jersey, he knew there was one quite close to me (he even posted 
>the address).
>
>
>My point was Richard's flagrant dishonesty in (among other things) claiming 
>the nearest one was "a long bus ride" and "two hours" distant. It was one of 
>his stupid and petty attempts at trolling. It didn't warrant any discussion 
>other than as a way of highlighting Richard's behavior here. There was no 
>reason for Xeno to intervene; although it became clear later why he did: to 
>suggest that I might be the one who was lying. Ironically, that was also a 
>stupid and dishonest troll on Xeno's part.
>
>Share wrote: 
>
>
>
>Judy, right before this argument, Xeno defended you and your desire for 
>privacy to Richard with regards to Whole Foods. 
>
>

RE: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

Re: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

I have no control over which posts of mine you read, Judy, ergo I have no 
control over how you spend your time on FFL. 

 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:58 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Share, if you want to know what I'm saying, go back and read the exchange from 
the beginning, because I've said it all there already. Don't waste my time with 
stupid questions, please.

And I'm not the least bit interested in how things "seem" to you. As you may 
have noticed, I don't exactly hold your ability to evaluate what happens on FFL 
in high esteem.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

Judy, are you saying that Xeno accused you of lying twice?! Once with *if true* 
and once about Whole Foods?! Xeno's intention seemed friendly to me even tho he 
got it wrong about your alleged desire for privacy. 

 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:00 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

BTW, Share, another thing you missed is that there was no "desire for privacy" 
on my part in my exchange with Richard; that was purely Xeno's notion. As I 
explained to Xeno, Richard already knew where I live, because I've mentioned it 
here before. And because Richard had looked up the locations of Whole Foods 
stores in New Jersey, he knew there was one quite close to me (he even posted 
the address).

My point was Richard's flagrant dishonesty in (among other things) claiming the 
nearest one was "a long bus ride" and "two hours" distant. It was one of his 
stupid and petty attempts at trolling. It didn't warrant any discussion other 
than as a way of highlighting Richard's behavior here. There was no reason for 
Xeno to intervene; although it became clear later why he did: to suggest that I 
might be the one who was lying. Ironically, that was also a stupid and 
dishonest troll on Xeno's part.

Share wrote: 

Judy, right before this argument, Xeno defended you and your desire for privacy 
to Richard with regards to Whole Foods.

Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

What did I get? That you called Xeno dishonest in a convoluted way? But you 
claim to be the most straight forward poster!

 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 10:00 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Very good, Share, you got that at least. 

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either dishonest or stupid. Then you 
go on to say TWICE that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a convoluted 
way that he's dishonest.

 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:28 AM
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Xeno wrote:

I did notice that you did not document a number of comments you made here. But 
this response simplifies things immensely because if this is true, anything I 
write to you here on FFL in the absence of my documentation here with regard to 
these points or my withdrawing my comments here and earlier in the thread, by 
your own words must stop you from responding if you do not wish to go back on 
your word. Very Robinish!

You are either very dishonest or very stupid. You made accusations which, if 
they were true, you would be able to document. I made no such accusations.

I don't think you're so stupid as not to have realized this.

I said I wouldn't discuss anything with you unless you withdraw your 
accusations (you can't document them because they're patently not true). I 
didn't say I wouldn't comment if I found it appropriate to do so (e.g., if you 
make any more false or insulting statements about me, I may respond to them). 
But your accusations, as long as they're on the table, have effectively 
foreclosed on the possibility of our having a friendly discussion of 
"philosophy or science or music" or any other neutral topic.

And that's not even a tiny bit "Robinish," nor are you so stupid as to think it 
is.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:
>
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  
>authfriend wrote:
>
>
>Xeno wrote: 
>
>Authfriend wrote: 'For, what, the sixth time, what was the basis for your 
>suspicion that what I had written was a lie?' 
>
>
>You seem to be looking for a response from me of the form J says x but y is 
>true.
>
>
>I am looking for an explanation of why you think this.
>
>
>But it is not a specific fact that makes me come to my conclusion. It is 
>rather your pattern of deviousness
>
>
>OK, stop right there and document that I have a "pattern of deviousness," with 
>examples.
>
>
>I am not devious, I am as straightforward as it gets, so it's going to be 
>pretty difficult.
>
>
>and extended argumentation, which is an intuitive and subjective evaluation by 
>which I come to this conclusion. You kind of remind me of the tenant portrayed 
>by Michael Keaton the movie 'Pacific Heights'. You begin with the appearance 
>of being on the level, and then
>
>
>Wikipedia:
>In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by 
>starting arguments
>
>
>I have been known to start an argument. So have you, so have many others here. 
>Since when is this a sign of "a pattern of deviousness"?
>
>
>or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic 
>messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either 
>accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an 
>emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
>
>
>Yeah, I don't do any of that. And I'm quite sure you know it.
>
>And in fact, I undoubtedly engage in some of the same when I am arguing with 
>you; there does not seem to be much choice if one wants to continue the 
>discussion. I do not like to sow discord, but it inevitably
 happens when we get into a discussion.
>
>Do I ever lie? The answer is yes. Even M recommended lying under certain 
>circumstances. This world of illusion is rotten to the core. Do you ever lie? 
>Of all the people currently on FFL, you accuse others of lying more than 
>anyone. That is of course, my other reason for suspecting you of a lack of 
>integrity.
>
>
>That's not a rational reason, of course. And I don't just accuse, I document 
>my accusations.
>
>
>Certain people seem to manage to create the aura of integrity without 
>insisting others prove the

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

turq, even in Funny Farm Lounge, to change her mind is a woman's perogative. 
But I don't think of that as lying.

 From: turquoiseb 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 9:57 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either 
> dishonest or stupid. Then you go on to say TWICE 
> that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a 
> convoluted way that he's dishonest.

All while having a discussion with the person
she claimed only yesterday she was never going
to discuss *anything* with until he either 
documented something or retracted it. He
did neither.

And she thinks HE's dishonest? Chortle.

RE: Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread turquoiseb

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Share Long  wrote:
>
> Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either 
> dishonest or stupid. Then you go on to say TWICE 
> that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a 
> convoluted way that he's dishonest.

All while having a discussion with the person
she claimed only yesterday she was never going
to discuss *anything* with until he either 
documented something or retracted it. He
did neither.

And she thinks HE's dishonest? Chortle.

Re: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

I'm chuckling as I post this bit from Eckhart Tolle on the pain body, imagining 
FFL posters telling each other that their pain body has taken  over: 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcYrm7h86Rk

 From: "doctordumb...@rocketmail.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:52 AM
Subject: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

I thought Jason's description of your and Judy's dysfunctional relationship, 
was spot on. Any time one of you begins to modify your behavior to stop this 
ego rivalry, the other one will quickly send out a baited message, to 
perpetuate it.

Pretty fucking dumb, by both of you, is all I can say.   

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

Argue-Bot, vowing not to start future arguments with victim:

> > 
>> > Why don't you fuck off? I'm not going to discuss anything 
>> > with you until you've documented your accusations, or 
>> > withdrawn them.
>
>Victim, calling her bluff:

> 
>> I did notice that you did not document a number of comments 
>> you made here. But this response simplifies things immensely 
>> because if this is true, anything I write to you here on FFL 
>> in the absence of my documentation here with regard to these 
>> points or my withdrawing my comments here and earlier in the 
>> thread, by your own words must stop you from responding if 
>> you do not wish to go back on your word. Very Robinish!
>
>This should be interesting. 

Judy either LIED above about "not discussing anything"
with this particular victim du jour, or she didn't.

What's the FFL consensus? That is, how long until 
she's ragging on him again, trying to get him to
respond to her, and thus get sucked into her 
eternally-dueling-egos Tarbaby scenario? She 
*did*, after all, specify "I'm not going to 
discuss ANYTHING with you until..." He's clearly
not going to jump through hoops, fall for the
taunt, and cater to her demands. So if she writes
to him in the future, she LIED. Simple as that.

Can you say, "Hoist on one's own petard?" I think
you can.  :-)

Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

Judy, here you begin by telling Xeno he's either dishonest or stupid. Then you 
go on to say TWICE that he's not stupid. Ergo, you are saying in a convoluted 
way that he's dishonest.

 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:28 AM
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Xeno wrote:

I did notice that you did not document a number of comments you made here. But 
this response simplifies things immensely because if this is true, anything I 
write to you here on FFL in the absence of my documentation here with regard to 
these points or my withdrawing my comments here and earlier in the thread, by 
your own words must stop you from responding if you do not wish to go back on 
your word. Very Robinish!

You are either very dishonest or very stupid. You made accusations which, if 
they were true, you would be able to document. I made no such accusations.

I don't think you're so stupid as not to have realized this.

I said I wouldn't discuss anything with you unless you withdraw your 
accusations (you can't document them because they're patently not true). I 
didn't say I wouldn't comment if I found it appropriate to do so (e.g., if you 
make any more false or insulting statements about me, I may respond to them). 
But your accusations, as long as they're on the table, have effectively 
foreclosed on the possibility of our having a friendly discussion of 
"philosophy or science or music" or any other neutral topic.

And that's not even a tiny bit "Robinish," nor are you so stupid as to think it 
is.

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  
authfriend wrote:

Xeno wrote: 

Authfriend wrote: 'For, what, the sixth time, what was the basis for your 
suspicion that what I had written was a lie?' 

You seem to be looking for a response from me of the form J says x but y is 
true.

I am looking for an explanation of why you think this.

But it is not a specific fact that makes me come to my conclusion. It is rather 
your pattern of deviousness

OK, stop right there and document that I have a "pattern of deviousness," with 
examples.

I am not devious, I am as straightforward as it gets, so it's going to be 
pretty difficult.

and extended argumentation, which is an intuitive and subjective evaluation by 
which I come to this conclusion. You kind of remind me of the tenant portrayed 
by Michael Keaton the movie 'Pacific Heights'. You begin with the appearance of 
being on the level, and then

Wikipedia:
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by 
starting arguments

I have been known to start an argument. So have you, so have many others here. 
Since when is this a sign of "a pattern of deviousness"?

or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages 
in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either 
accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an 
emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

Yeah, I don't do any of that. And I'm quite sure you know it.

And in fact, I undoubtedly engage in some of the same when I am arguing with 
you; there does not seem to be much choice if one wants to continue the 
discussion. I do not like to sow discord, but it inevitably happens when we get 
into a discussion.

Do I ever lie? The answer is yes. Even M recommended lying under certain 
circumstances. This world of illusion is rotten to the core. Do you ever lie? 
Of all the people currently on FFL, you accuse others of lying more than 
anyone. That is of course, my other reason for suspecting you of a lack of 
integrity.

That's not a rational reason, of course. And I don't just accuse, I document my 
accusations.

Certain people seem to manage to create the aura of integrity without insisting 
others prove their own or without asking others to apologise for doubting 
theirs. The late Senator Moynihan from New York comes to mind, a rarity in the 
political world. In my world, the personal aspect of life really cannot have 
integrity; only the whole of life has integrity, but that is not the integrity 
arrived at by conforming to a model of behaviour; it is simply it cannot be 
compared to anything else.

Blablabla...more irrelevant bafflegab.

I just find it disingenuous that you try to ride the moral high horse, from 
which you have fallen long ago

Please give the specifics of this claim (including when this falling 
purportedly happened).

you are rather lifting the tail of a dead one. I never really could ride a 
horse myself. As an individual body, there is always something corruptible wh

Re: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

Judy, in his initial response, Xeno said something like that it's a phrase that 
indicates that one has no supporting evidence, sounding like his usual 
philosophical self.

 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 7:40 AM
Subject: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Share wrote: 

Judy, right before this argument, Xeno defended you and your desire for privacy 
to Richard with regards to Whole Foods. And even in this argument, Xeno sounds 
like a philosophical friend. In such circumstances, can't 2 little words *if 
true* be given a positive spin by you? Or at least a neutral one?! Your sort of 
knee jerk response feels like you're wasting a potential friendship with Xeno.

Xeno has foreclosed on the possibility of friendship with his false accusations.

I gave him the chance to explain "if true," initially without interpreting the 
phrase, and he (finally, after several attempts to avoid the issue) confirmed 
that those "2 little words" were neither friendly nor neutral; he meant them to 
cast doubt on my honesty.

When I think you might have something to contribute to how I manage my 
relationships here, I'll ask you. I doubt that will happen, though, unless you 
become a lot smarter than you demonstrate with your comments above.

 From: "authfriend@..." 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 4:53 PM
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: 
[FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

Xeno wrote: 

Authfriend wrote: 'For, what, the sixth time, what was the basis for your 
suspicion that what I had written was a lie?' 

You seem to be looking for a response from me of the form J says x but y is 
true.

I am looking for an explanation of why you think this.

But it is not a specific fact that makes me come to my conclusion. It is rather 
your pattern of deviousness

OK, stop right there and document that I have a "pattern of deviousness," with 
examples.

I am not devious, I am as straightforward as it gets, so it's going to be 
pretty difficult.

and extended argumentation, which is an intuitive and subjective evaluation by 
which I come to this conclusion. You kind of remind me of the tenant portrayed 
by Michael Keaton the movie 'Pacific Heights'. You begin with the appearance of 
being on the level, and then

Wikipedia:
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by 
starting arguments

I have been known to start an argument. So have you, so have many others here. 
Since when is this a sign of "a pattern of deviousness"?

or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages 
in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either 
accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an 
emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

Yeah, I don't do any of that. And I'm quite sure you know it.

And in fact, I undoubtedly engage in some of the same when I am arguing with 
you; there does not seem to be much choice if one wants
 to continue the discussion. I do not like to sow discord, but it inevitably 
happens when we get into a discussion.

Do I ever lie? The answer is yes. Even M recommended lying under certain 
circumstances. This world of illusion is rotten to the core. Do you ever lie? 
Of all the people currently on FFL, you accuse others of lying more than 
anyone. That is of course, my other reason for suspecting you of a lack of 
integrity.

That's not a rational reason, of course. And I don't just accuse, I document my 
accusations.

Certain people seem to manage to create the aura of integrity without insisting 
others prove their own or without asking others to apologise for doubting 
theirs. The late Senator Moynihan from New York comes to mind, a rarity in the 
political world. In my world, the personal aspect of life really cannot have 
integrity; only the whole of life has integrity, but that is not the integrity 
arrived at by conforming to a model of behaviour; it is simply it cannot be 
compared to anything else.

Blablabla...more irrelevant bafflegab.

I just find it disingenuous that you try to ride the moral high horse, from 
which you have fallen long ago

Please give the specifics of this claim (including when this falling 
purportedly happened).

you are rather lifting the tail of a dead one. I never really could ride a 
horse myself. As an individual body, there is always something corruptible when 
compared to some fictional higher standard. If you want to discuss philosophy 
or science or music, fine. But this issue of your alleged, self-promoted 
integr

Re: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

Judy, are you saying that Xeno accused you of lying twice?! Once with *if true* 
and once about Whole Foods?! Xeno's intention seemed friendly to me even tho he 
got it wrong about your alleged desire for privacy. 

 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:00 AM
Subject: RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

BTW, Share, another thing you missed is that there was no "desire for privacy" 
on my part in my exchange with Richard; that was purely Xeno's notion. As I 
explained to Xeno, Richard already knew where I live, because I've mentioned it 
here before. And because Richard had looked up the locations of Whole Foods 
stores in New Jersey, he knew there was one quite close to me (he even posted 
the address).

My point was Richard's flagrant dishonesty in (among other things) claiming the 
nearest one was "a long bus ride" and "two hours" distant. It was one of his 
stupid and petty attempts at trolling. It didn't warrant any discussion other 
than as a way of highlighting Richard's behavior here. There was no reason for 
Xeno to intervene; although it became clear later why he did: to suggest that I 
might be the one who was lying. Ironically, that was also a stupid and 
dishonest troll on Xeno's part.

Share wrote: 

Judy, right before this argument, Xeno defended you and your desire for privacy 
to Richard with regards to Whole Foods.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

dear Richard, I'm happy to call you whatever your preference is. I notice a lot 
of the guys call you by the WT name. I enjoyed calling you punditster sir with 
various spellings. Anyway, hope all your new equipment is working great (-:





 From: Richard J. Williams 
To: Richard J. Williams  
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2013 8:30 AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
My statement about Judy being prejudiced toward anyone 
living in Texas still stands. Let's see, how many times did she 
address me as 'willytex', AFTER I told her my name was Richard 
at least six times?
 
Judy hates people from Texas so ergo, she hates George W.
 Bush. So, she called him a liar. Judy is a hateful hypocrite.

It's no coincidence that Whole Foods is headquartered in Texas
so she told a fib about visiting the store in New Jersey. I guess 
she thought she could get away with fibbing, but I caught her 
lying. Now she's really upset - can't deal with it, I guess.

Case closed.

On 9/23/2013 6:45 AM, Share Long wrote:

  
>Judy, right before this argument, Xeno defended you and your desire for 
>privacy to Richard with regards to Whole Foods. And even in this argument, 
>Xeno sounds like a philosophical friend. In such circumstances, can't 2 little 
>words *if true* be given a positive spin by you? Or at least a neutral one?! 
>Your sort of knee jerk response feels like you're wasting a potential 
>friendship with Xeno.
> 
>
>
>
>
> From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
>To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
>Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 4:53 PM
>Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: 
>[FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
> 
>
>
>  
>Xeno wrote: 
>
>Authfriend wrote: 'For, what, the sixth time, what was the basis for your 
>suspicion that what I had written was a lie?' 
>
>
>You seem to be looking for a response
from me of the form J says x but y is
true.
>
>
>I am looking for an explanation of why you think this.
>
>
>But it is not a specific fact that makes me come to my conclusion. It is 
>rather your pattern of deviousness
>
>
>OK, stop right there and document that I have a "pattern of deviousness," with 
>examples.
>
>
>I am not devious, I am as straightforward as it gets, so it's going to be 
>pretty difficult.
>
>
>and extended argumentation, which is an intuitive and subjective evaluation by 
>which I come to this conclusion. You kind of remind me of the tenant portrayed 
>by Michael Keaton the movie 'Pacific Heights'. You begin with the appearance 
>of being on the level, and then
>
>
>Wikipedia:
>In Internet slang, a troll is a person
who sows discord on the Internet by
starting arguments
>
>
>I have been known to start an argument. So have you, so have many others here. 
>Since when is this a sign of "a pattern of deviousness"?
>
>
>or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic 
>messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either 
>accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an 
>emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.
>
>
>Yeah, I don't do any of that. And I'm quite sure you know it.
>
>And in fact, I undoubtedly engage in
some of the same when I am arguing with
you; there does not seem to be much
choice if one wants to continue the
discussion. I do not like to sow
discord, but it inevitably happens when
we get into a discussion.
>
>Do I ever lie? The answer is yes. Even M
recommended lying under certain
circumstances. This world of illusion is
rotten to the core. Do you ever lie? Of
all the people currently on FFL, you
accuse others of lying more than anyone.
That is of course, my other reason for
suspecting you of a lack of integrity.
>
>
>That's not a rational reason, of course. And I don't just accuse, I document 
>my accusations.
>
>
>Certain people seem to manage to create the aura of integrity without 
>insisting others prove their own or without asking others to apologise for 
>

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread awoelflebater

RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread awoelflebater

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread turquoiseb

At 11:53pm yesterday (my time) Judy wrote to Xeno:
>
> Why don't you fuck off? I'm not going to discuss anything
> with you until you've documented your accusations, or
> withdrawn them.

At 5:38am today (my time) Xeno made it clear that he was
not going to do either, and thus expected Judy to keep her
word and cease all attempts to have discussions with him:
>
> I did notice that you did not document a number of comments
> you made here. But this response simplifies things immensely
> because if this is true, anything I write to you here on
> FFL in the absence of my documentation here with regard to
> these points or my withdrawing my comments here and earlier
> in the thread, by your own words must stop you from responding
> if you do not wish to go back on your word. Very Robinish!

At 2:28 today (my time), Judy broke her word and wrote to
Xeno *directly*, after claiming she wouldn't, addressing
him directly and calling him "either very dishonest or very
stupid."

In other words, having realized the bind she'd placed herself
in, she backpedalled like crazy and claimed that she'd never
said she wouldn't "comment" on things he posted. She's NOT
"commenting" in this later reply, she's addressing Xeno
*directly*, and thus attempting to have a discussion with
him, the very thing she said she'd not do unless he did
what she wanted.

In other words, Judy LIED.

In "Judyworld," addressing a person directly, calling them
names, and attempting anything she can possibly think of to
lure them back into an argument is NOT "discussing" things
with them. Doing this with someone who had made it clear
that he was *happy* that she will no longer be attempting to
discuss things with him is -- in her mind -- NOT "discussing"
things with him. It's something else.

Insanity, maybe?  :-)  :-)  :-)

Xeno wrote:
I  did notice that you did not document a number of comments you made 
here. But this response simplifies things immensely because if this is 
true, anything I write to you here on FFL in the absence of my 
documentation here with regard to these points or my withdrawing my 
comments here and earlier in the thread, by your own words must stop you
from responding if you do not wish to go back on your word. Very 
Robinish!

You  are either very dishonest or very stupid. You made accusations
which,  if they were true, you would be able to document. I made no such
accusations.
I don't think you're so stupid as not to have realized this.
I said I wouldn't discuss anything  with you unless you withdraw your
accusations (you can't document them  because they're patently not
true). I didn't say I wouldn't comment if  I found it appropriate to do
so (e.g., if you make any more false or  insulting statements about me,
I may respond to them). But your  accusations, as long as they're on the
table, have effectively  foreclosed on the possibility of our having a
friendly discussion of  "philosophy or science or music" or any other
neutral topic.
And that's not even a tiny bit "Robinish," nor are you so stupid as to
think it is.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 9/22/2013 8:13 PM, awoelfleba...@yahoo.com wrote:

--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,  
wrote:

On 9/22/2013 10:17 AM, Jason wrote:
> Holy mother Ganges!! You must have really offended both of
> them (Barry & Judy).
>
> I wonder what exactly you did, for both of them to shun you.
>
It's not complicated - they are both prejudiced against
people that live in Texas - they've said as much since 1999.

Barry and Judy have been encouraging everyone to shun
me for years. Go figure.

I probably posted 3,000 on-topic posts to alt.m.t. for five
years before I received a single reply from Judy.

Then, when I challenged her assertion that Bush lied - now
she really hates me for proving that John Kerry is a liar.

John Kerry did NOT spend Christmas of 1968 in Cambodia!

In Barry's case, he is still mad at me for poking fun at the
Zen Master Rama - but he pokes fun at MMY all the time.

Go figure.

Yes, it is surprising to find out that some TMers are so
fixated on a person's birth circumstances. What's really
funny is that Judy has never been to Texas and Barry is
from Texas. LoL!

Check out Ann, the bottom poster, and her reply to my
post about home security! Good example of prejudice:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/358450

Ha, Richard, the guy who says he has to protect himself from gays,
transgendered men and women and lesbians (not to mention
skinheads). Who's the prejudiced one? But he's right, I think I
hate Texas.

It was a joke Ann, get a life. I don't care who they are if they try to 
break into my house.

> authfriend:
> > Thank you, Richard, you have provided a perfect demonstration
> > over the past few days for everyone to see that what I said
> > about you to Michael: you are a troll and a liar.
> >

--- "punditster"   wrote:
>
> If you don't like it, just ignore me like you've been
> doing since 1999. LoL!
>
> You don't have to respond to every single post here - if
> you don't live near a Whole Foods just say so. Just cut
> the crap, Judy, and stop the lying about it.
>
> And you don't need to put others down just for wanting to
> eat a few organic oranges at a local health food store.
>
> We're not all poor people and I don't spend my 'whole
> paycheck' at the market - I probably earn more retired
> than you do working all day. Go figure.
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Richard J. Williams


My statement about Judy being prejudiced toward anyone
living in Texas still stands. Let's see, how many times did she
address me as 'willytex', AFTER I told her my name was Richard
at least six times?

Judy hates people from Texas so ergo, she hates George W.
 Bush. So, she called him a liar. Judy is a hateful hypocrite.

It's no coincidence that Whole Foods is headquartered in Texas
so she told a fib about visiting the store in New Jersey. I guess
she thought she could get away with fibbing, but I caught her
lying. Now she's really upset - can't deal with it, I guess.

Case closed.

On 9/23/2013 6:45 AM, Share Long wrote:
Judy, right before this argument, Xeno defended you and your desire 
for privacy to Richard with regards to Whole Foods. And even in this 
argument, Xeno sounds like a philosophical friend. In such 
circumstances, can't 2 little words *if true* be given a positive spin 
by you? Or at least a neutral one?! Your sort of knee jerk response 
feels like you're wasting a potential friendship with Xeno.



*From:* "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
*To:* FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
*Sent:* Sunday, September 22, 2013 4:53 PM
*Subject:* RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: 
RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods


*Xeno wrote: *

Authfriend wrote: 'For, what, the sixth time, what was the basis for 
your suspicion that what I had written was a lie?'


You seem to be looking for a response from me of the form J says x but 
y is true.


*I am looking for an explanation of /why/ you think this.*

But it is not a specific fact that makes me come to my conclusion. It 
is rather your pattern of deviousness


*OK, stop right there and document that I have a "pattern of 
deviousness," with examples.*

*
*
*I am not devious, I am as straightforward as it gets, so it's going 
to be pretty difficult.*


and extended argumentation, which is an intuitive and subjective 
evaluation by which I come to this conclusion. You kind of remind me 
of the tenant portrayed by Michael Keaton the movie 'Pacific Heights'. 
You begin with the appearance of being on the level, and then


Wikipedia:
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the 
Internet by starting arguments


*I have been known to start an argument. So have you, so have many 
others here. Since when is this a sign of "a pattern of deviousness"?*


or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic 
messages in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), 
either accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers 
into an emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic 
discussion.


*Yeah, I don't do any of that. And I'm quite sure you know it.*

And in fact, I undoubtedly engage in some of the same when I am 
arguing with you; there does not seem to be much choice if one wants 
to continue the discussion. I do not like to sow discord, but it 
inevitably happens when we get into a discussion.


Do I ever lie? The answer is yes. Even M recommended lying under 
certain circumstances. This world of illusion is rotten to the core. 
Do you ever lie? Of all the people currently on FFL, you accuse others 
of lying more than anyone. That is of course, my other reason for 
suspecting you of a lack of integrity.


*That's not a rational reason, of course. And I don't just accuse, I 
/document/ my accusations.*


Certain people seem to manage to create the aura of integrity without 
insisting others prove their own or without asking others to apologise 
for doubting theirs. The late Senator Moynihan from New York comes to 
mind, a rarity in the political world. In my world, the personal 
aspect of life really cannot have integrity; only the whole of life 
has integrity, but that is not the integrity arrived at by conforming 
to a model of behaviour; it is simply it cannot be compared to 
anything else.


*Blablabla...more irrelevant bafflegab.
*
I just find it disingenuous that you try to ride the moral high horse, 
from which you have fallen long ago


*Please give the specifics of this claim (including when this falling 
purportedly happened).*


you are rather lifting the tail of a dead one. I never really could 
ride a horse myself. As an individual body, there is always something 
corruptible when compared to some fictional higher standard. If you 
want to discuss philosophy or science or music, fine. But this issue 
of your alleged, self-promoted integrity and the incredible lack of it 
in others is not a viable subject.


*As I reminded Curtis when he tried this ploy, the only time I 
"promote my integrity" is when I'm accused of having a lack of it. 
It's not an uncommon response from people I've caught being dishonest, 
but never has anybody be

RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread doctordumbass

RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread authfriend

Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread Share Long

Judy, right before this argument, Xeno defended you and your desire for privacy 
to Richard with regards to Whole Foods. And even in this argument, Xeno sounds 
like a philosophical friend. In such circumstances, can't 2 little words *if 
true* be given a positive spin by you? Or at least a neutral one?! Your sort of 
knee jerk response feels like you're wasting a potential friendship with Xeno.




 From: "authfri...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Sunday, September 22, 2013 4:53 PM
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: 
[FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Xeno wrote: 

Authfriend wrote: 'For, what, the sixth time, what was the basis for your 
suspicion that what I had written was a lie?' 


You seem to be looking for a response from me of the form J says x but y is 
true.

I am looking for an explanation of why you think this.

But it is not a specific fact that makes me come to my conclusion. It is rather 
your pattern of deviousness

OK, stop right there and document that I have a "pattern of deviousness," with 
examples.

I am not devious, I am as straightforward as it gets, so it's going to be 
pretty difficult.

and extended argumentation, which is an intuitive and subjective evaluation by 
which I come to this conclusion. You kind of remind me of the tenant portrayed 
by Michael Keaton the movie 'Pacific Heights'. You begin with the appearance of 
being on the level, and then


Wikipedia:
In Internet slang, a troll is a person who sows discord on the Internet by 
starting arguments

I have been known to start an argument. So have you, so have many others here. 
Since when is this a sign of "a pattern of deviousness"?

or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, extraneous, or off-topic messages 
in an online community (such as a forum, chat room, or blog), either 
accidentally or with the deliberate intent of provoking readers into an 
emotional response or of otherwise disrupting normal on-topic discussion.

Yeah, I don't do any of that. And I'm quite sure you know it.

And in fact, I undoubtedly engage in some of the same when I am arguing with 
you; there does not seem to be much choice if one wants to continue the 
discussion. I do not like to sow discord, but it inevitably happens when we get 
into a discussion.

Do I ever lie? The answer is yes. Even M recommended lying under certain 
circumstances. This world of illusion is rotten to the core. Do you ever lie? 
Of all the people currently on FFL, you accuse others of lying more than 
anyone. That is of course, my other reason for suspecting you of a lack of 
integrity.

That's not a rational reason, of course. And I don't just accuse, I document my 
accusations.

Certain people seem to manage to create the aura of integrity without insisting 
others prove their own or without asking others to apologise for doubting 
theirs. The late Senator Moynihan from New York comes to mind, a rarity in the 
political world. In my world, the personal aspect of life really cannot have 
integrity; only the whole of life has integrity, but that is not the integrity 
arrived at by conforming to a model of behaviour; it is simply it cannot be 
compared to anything else.

Blablabla...more irrelevant bafflegab.

I just find it disingenuous that you try to ride the moral high horse, from 
which you have fallen long ago

Please give the specifics of this claim (including when this falling 
purportedly happened).

you are rather lifting the tail of a dead one. I never really could ride a 
horse myself. As an individual body, there is always something corruptible when 
compared to some fictional higher standard. If you want to discuss philosophy 
or science or music, fine. But this issue of your alleged, self-promoted 
integrity and the incredible lack of it in others is not a viable subject.


As I reminded Curtis when he tried this ploy, the only time I "promote my 
integrity" is when I'm accused of having a lack of it. It's not an uncommon 
response from people I've caught being dishonest, but never has anybody been 
able to make it stick. Rarely is an example even given, just the vague charge. 
Vaj used to do that a lot.

Why don't we discuss Mozart?

Why don't you fuck off? I'm not going to discuss anything with you until you've 
documented your accusations, or withdrawn them.

You bit off a lot more than you can chew here.

>>>>>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-23 Thread turquoiseb

Argue-Bot, vowing not to start future arguments with victim:
> > 
> > Why don't you fuck off? I'm not going to discuss anything 
> > with you until you've documented your accusations, or 
> > withdrawn them.

Victim, calling her bluff:
> 
> I did notice that you did not document a number of comments 
> you made here. But this response simplifies things immensely 
> because if this is true, anything I write to you here on FFL 
> in the absence of my documentation here with regard to these 
> points or my withdrawing my comments here and earlier in the 
> thread, by your own words must stop you from responding if 
> you do not wish to go back on your word. Very Robinish!

This should be interesting. 

Judy either LIED above about "not discussing anything"
with this particular victim du jour, or she didn't.

What's the FFL consensus? That is, how long until 
she's ragging on him again, trying to get him to
respond to her, and thus get sucked into her 
eternally-dueling-egos Tarbaby scenario? She 
*did*, after all, specify "I'm not going to 
discuss ANYTHING with you until..." He's clearly
not going to jump through hoops, fall for the
taunt, and cater to her demands. So if she writes
to him in the future, she LIED. Simple as that.

Can you say, "Hoist on one's own petard?" I think
you can.  :-)

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-22 Thread anartaxius

RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-22 Thread awoelflebater

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-22 Thread authfriend

RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-22 Thread anartaxius

RE: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-22 Thread awoelflebater

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-22 Thread Richard J. Williams

On 9/22/2013 10:17 AM, Jason wrote:
> Holy mother Ganges!! You must have really offended both of
> them (Barry & Judy).
>
> I wonder what exactly you did, for both of them to shun you.
>
It's not complicated - they are both prejudiced against
people that live in Texas - they've said as much since 1999.

Barry and Judy have been encouraging everyone to shun
me for years. Go figure.

I probably posted 3,000 on-topic posts to alt.m.t. for five
years before I received a single reply from Judy.

Then, when I challenged her assertion that Bush lied - now
she really hates me for proving that John Kerry is a liar.

John Kerry did NOT spend Christmas of 1968 in Cambodia!

In Barry's case, he is still mad at me for poking fun at the
Zen Master Rama - but he pokes fun at MMY all the time.

Go figure.

Yes, it is surprising to find out that some TMers are so
fixated on a person's birth circumstances. What's really
funny is that Judy has never been to Texas and Barry is
from Texas. LoL!

Check out Ann, the bottom poster, and her reply to my
post about home security! Good example of prejudice:

http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/358450

> authfriend:
> > Thank you, Richard, you have provided a perfect demonstration
> > over the past few days for everyone to see that what I said
> > about you to Michael: you are a troll and a liar.
> >

--- "punditster"  wrote:
>
> If you don't like it, just ignore me like you've been
> doing since 1999. LoL!
>
> You don't have to respond to every single post here - if
> you don't live near a Whole Foods just say so. Just cut
> the crap, Judy, and stop the lying about it.
>
> And you don't need to put others down just for wanting to
> eat a few organic oranges at a local health food store.
>
> We're not all poor people and I don't spend my 'whole
> paycheck' at the market - I probably earn more retired
> than you do working all day. Go figure.
>

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-22 Thread Steve Sundur

Finally, something original!

Holy mother Ganges!! You must have really offended both of 
them (Barry & Judy).

I wonder what exactly you did, for both of them to shun you.

RE: Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-22 Thread authfriend

Re: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods

2013-09-22 Thread Share Long

for Xeno, to Judy, during my argument with you about Buck, I had the thought: 
Judy could be such a mensch. She's on the brink of being a true mensch. If only 
she could recognize that MAYBE someone else is making a valid point. If only 
she could recognize that MAYBE she made a mistake, got something wrong. And 
here I'm not talking about philosophical discussions. Anyway, I take a 
psychological perspective on this kind of situation but no longer find it 
useful to share such perspectives here. From my own experience it is extremely 
liberating to recognize that I made a mistake, that I got something wrong. And 
more, will probably do so again.




 From: "anartax...@yahoo.com" 
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com 
Sent: Saturday, September 21, 2013 3:06 PM
Subject: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: RE: Re: 
[FairfieldLife] Re: Surviving Whole Foods
 


  
Perhaps both are perspectives are distorted.What do others think of this 
exchange? We are not always the best judge of our own behaviour.

  







>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>

1 2 >

1 - 100 of 116 matches

Mail list logo