Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
dear RaunchyD, thank you so much for posting that wonderful ad for Bounty paper towels. You and Ann facilitated my laughing aloud Still quantum lightweaving today until 5. From: raunchydog raunchy...@yahoo.com To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com Sent: Saturday, August 18, 2012 5:47 PM Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote: Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. It's pretty scary, isn't it? Everybody's crazy but me and thee, Samanthy, and sometimes I think even thee is a little strange. Jesus, I go to Vancouver for 8 hours I'm sitting on the ferry and take a peek at FFL and all hell has broken loose. Now will you all get back in your cages and stop terrorizing the orderlies. This is the last time I leave you all unattended and AZ, we need to have a talk. There's a law against plagiarism and inciting the loonies to riot. Now settle down, I'll figure out all of your punishments tomorrow. (this has not been easy typing this on a damn iPhone by the way.) http://youtu.be/ryZky0y4ERg
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: On 08/18/2012 05:42 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: On 08/18/2012 11:33 AM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@ wrote: So, it's all about Robin. Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see how many others do. Well gee Willy, I guess if Judy sez that it must be true. That despite the fact that the post I quoted had the word Robin in it some 47 times. Guess Judy must have read it as Tobin (or did she read it at all)? :-D Somehow I don't think az expected that Bhairitu would be one of the folks who would fall for the gag, but I could have told az he might, given his propensity to believe in nutty conspiracy theories. Still, it's hard to fathom how anybody with two brain cells to rub together could have read even just the first paragraph and thought it was about Robin. Heck, the second sentence in the first paragraph should have been enough to clue folks in that something wasn't kosher, even if their reading skills were so deficient as to prevent them from being able to decode Robin's message. The real stunner, however, is Bhairitu's claim above, that the appearance of Robin's name in the post is enough to demonstrate that it's about Robin. I mean, it boggles the mind. You just wouldn't expect that kind of stupidity from someone who had managed to make a solid career for themselves. A few highlights: Bhairitu found employment as a musician at various clubs in the Village, as well as earning acting roles in film. His made his debut on the silver screen in Abel Ferrara's China Girl, for which he also wrote the end-credit song Midnight. Bhairitu went on to collaborate with Ferrara on several film and music projects, including: Bad Lieutenant, in which Bhairitu played Jesus Christ and co-wrote the end-credits song; Body Snatchers, which featured the song I Want You Back; and The Funeral, which saw Bhairitu co-starring with Christopher Walken, Isabella Rosselini, Benicio del Toro and Vincent Gallo. Bhairitu then co-starred in the off-Broadway show A Minor Incident with legendary songwriter Carole King, who was making her stage debut in the play. The two collaborated on songs for her Capitol Records release City Streets, including the song I Can't Stop Thinking About You, which Bhairitu co-wrote and plays guitar and performs backing vocals on. It was on stage with Carole King at London's Royal Albert Hall that Bhairitu was spotted by the producers of a new West End musical Buddy: The Buddy Holly Story. Buddy opened to rave reviews on 12 October 1989, at The Victoria Palace Theater. Bhairitu's turn in the title role of Buddy Holly earned him a nomination for the Laurence Olivier Award for Outstanding Performance by an Actor in a Musical. The following year, Buddy at Broadway's Shubert Theater in New York, and Bhairitu was nominated for a Tony Award for his performance, as well as winning the Theater World Award for Best Broadway Debut. After Buddy, Bhairitu appeared in the films Fathers Sons, with Jeff Goldblum, and as Jesus Christ opposite Harvey Keitel in Abel Ferrara's Bad Lieutenant, for which he also performed and co-wrote the title song, Bad Lieutenant with Ferrara. Bhairitu also appeared as Gene Vincent opposite Donal Logue (as Eddie Cochran) in the play Be-Bop-A-Lula at Hollywood's famed Theater/Theater before returning to the London stage for the 25th anniversary revival of Hair at the Old Vic, in the role of Berger. That might have been a fun career but it wasn't mine. Your name appears in it 11 times (it's much shorter than az's post). I don't know of anyone really named Bhairitu. It originally said Barry, but I replaced it with Bhairitu because that's the name you use here. snip Judy goes further into the ozone. Here is the first paragraph she is talking about: Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass tacks: It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces his underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: OMG, what a bunch of clueless, vain, petty fools - Bhairitu Xeno, dear Judy, I bow down to your patience in dealing with these petty mind, utterly threatened by Robin's brilliance. St. Share or St. Judy - oh no what a dilemma? Hi Ravi. Long time no see. I am not threatened by Robin's brilliance. I was speaking of my general impression of him, not attempting to refute what he says. Having said I did find dumbaz's gags very funny, laughing loud reading another one his posts, the one Share responded to, while waiting for my dinner order here at a restaurant. That these morons are so stuck in their heads is really sad - they could have just had fun, come with witty responses, retorts but all we have is their repugnant prejudices exposed in such a pathetic fashion. It always baffles me when I see people taking Xeno's mental constructs so seriously and I know I have always been curious on how he interacts with normal people in his daily life, I have asked him before and all I got was more mental constructs. Nothing of what I say is really true, and indeed when I say anything it is presented as a mental construct. There is no way to speak without a mental constuct. Saying 'there is no way to speak without a mental construct' is a mental construct. And there is no daily life interaction on FFL, no interaction with normal people, there is only the symbolic structure of language rolling back and forth, so all I get from you, from, Judy, from Barry, etc., are mental constructs. Then one has to make something of those with what one has, and reply using one's own particular mental construct. You operate from the level of your gut perhaps more than anyone here. I do operate that way sometimes, but it is much more subdued especially compared to you, if I interpret the text you write here. It was perhaps that over-emotional style of yours that gets you booted off here at times. The human mind creates a world, and the separate worlds of human interaction do not line up in neat coherent rows. As I am like a separate alien universe to you, so you are to me, when comparing our mental styles. Our emotional palettes are vastly different. Azgrey's post(s) were rather interesting assaults on Robin. I felt the general tenor of the content somewhat appropriate, considering some of the other posts in a similar vein that were more direct, and based on those persons' having known Robin. Robin has the intellectual kutzpah to deal with that post. Judy was correct in that I cannot quite fathom Robin, but I am not sure she does either. I feel Judy is always down in the trenches, logically precise, but does not see the general sweep of the battle. I used to think in ways a lot like Judy. I was, and still am probably in a different way, insufferable. Judy does it with a scope and precision I could never have mustered. It takes too much energy. And how I interact with normal people in my daily life, well, that is a deep deep secret of the universe, hidden from the eyes of dear dear Ravi. Love, Ravi
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
So, it's all about Robin. Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see how many others do. Bhairitu: Well gee Willy, I guess if Judy sez that it must be true. So, now it's all about Judy. LoL! That despite the fact that the post I quoted had the word Robin in it some 47 times. Guess Judy must have read it as Tobin (or did she read it at all)? :-D So, Judy fell down the rabbit hole again, but we got fooled?
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
authfriend: Bhairitu found employment as a musician at various clubs in the Village... So, now it's all about 'Bhairitu'. LoL! , as well as earning acting roles in film. His made his debut on the silver screen in Abel Ferrara's China Girl, for which he also wrote the end-credit song Midnight. Bhairitu went on to collaborate with Ferrara on several film and music projects, including: Bad Lieutenant, in which Bhairitu played Jesus Christ and co-wrote the end-credits song; Body Snatchers, which featured the song I Want You Back; and The Funeral, which saw Bhairitu co-starring with Christopher Walken, Isabella Rosselini, Benicio del Toro and Vincent Gallo. Bhairitu then co-starred in the off-Broadway show A Minor Incident with legendary songwriter Carole King, who was making her stage debut in the play. The two collaborated on songs for her Capitol Records release City Streets, including the song I Can't Stop Thinking About You, which Bhairitu co-wrote and plays guitar and performs backing vocals on. It was on stage with Carole King at London's Royal Albert Hall that Bhairitu was spotted by the producers of a new West End musical Buddy: The Buddy Holly Story. Buddy opened to rave reviews on 12 October 1989, at The Victoria Palace Theater. Bhairitu's turn in the title role of Buddy Holly earned him a nomination for the Laurence Olivier Award for Outstanding Performance by an Actor in a Musical. The following year, Buddy at Broadway's Shubert Theater in New York, and Bhairitu was nominated for a Tony Award for his performance, as well as winning the Theater World Award for Best Broadway Debut. After Buddy, Bhairitu appeared in the films Fathers Sons, with Jeff Goldblum, and as Jesus Christ opposite Harvey Keitel in Abel Ferrara's Bad Lieutenant, for which he also performed and co-wrote the title song, Bad Lieutenant with Ferrara. Bhairitu also appeared as Gene Vincent opposite Donal Logue (as Eddie Cochran) in the play Be-Bop-A-Lula at Hollywood's famed Theater/Theater before returning to the London stage for the 25th anniversary revival of Hair at the Old Vic, in the role of Berger.
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... wrote: Nothing of what I say is really true, and indeed when I say anything it is presented as a mental construct. There is no way to speak without a mental constuct. Saying 'there is no way to speak without a mental construct' is a mental construct. And there is no daily life interaction on FFL, no interaction with normal people, there is only the symbolic structure of language rolling back and forth, so all I get from you, from, Judy, from Barry, etc., are mental constructs. Then one has to make something of those with what one has, and reply using one's own particular mental construct. Exactly. Believing that what you believe equals truth is the disease of Narcissism, not the onset of Enlightenment.
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
You haven't made any kind of case against Robin here. All you've done is slung insults, and you've done it sloppily and dishonestly to boot. It's really beneath you... Ravi Chivukula: It always baffles me when I see people taking Xeno's mental constructs so seriously and I know I have always been curious on how he interacts with normal people in his daily life... Who says Xeno interacts with normal people in his daily life? You've got at least ten posting here anonymously, several of whom make TMer status claims. Who said their brother was a TMO Raja? LoL! So, what's it all about?
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
Bhairitu: I guess once a cult leader always a cult leader... Well, I gues it depends on how you define 'cult'. Robert J. Lifton: Meditation, in itself, is not good or bad. But when a venal person wants to sell you courses and persuade you to turn over your life to him, you must beware. If you end up a slave to a money-making power-seeking organization that pays no heed to the real difficulties you may experience as a result of certain practices, that is a bad use of those powerful practices.
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: OMG, what a bunch of clueless, vain, petty fools - Bhairitu Xeno, dear Judy, I bow down to your patience in dealing with these petty mind, utterly threatened by Robin's brilliance. St. Share or St. Judy - oh no what a dilemma? Hi Ravi. Long time no see. I am not threatened by Robin's brilliance. I was speaking of my general impression of him, not attempting to refute what he says. Right. You accused him of not making sense, of being deceptive, and of using the concept of first-person ontology to divide and conquer. All without providing a single example. snip Nothing of what I say is really true, and indeed when I say anything it is presented as a mental construct. One has an obligation, however, IMHO, to ensure that the mental constructs one presents are created with integrity, and that they are as clear, fair, and accurate as one can possibly make them. That these constructs are not Absolute Truth does not relieve one from the responsibility of maintaining intellectual honesty. snip Azgrey's post(s) were rather interesting assaults on Robin. I felt the general tenor of the content somewhat appropriate, considering some of the other posts in a similar vein that were more direct, and based on those persons' having known Robin. Robin has the intellectual kutzpah to deal with that post. There was nothing to be dealt with in those posts other than to point out that they were pastiches of remarks made by other writers about other people in other circumstances, with Robin's name repeatedly spliced in; and that the vast majority of these remarks did not, in fact, apply to Robin. They were at best a mildly amusing gag at Robin's expense, hardly qualifying as interesting assaults on Robin in any other sense. Judy was correct in that I cannot quite fathom Robin, but I am not sure she does either. I feel Judy is always down in the trenches, logically precise, but does not see the general sweep of the battle. Judy deals with what's in the trenches because far too often, inaccurate, misleading, and/or dishonest reports from the trenches result in a seriously distorted picture of the general sweep of the battle.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
Oh my cold, heartless Xeno, It's unfortunate that you can't see how utterly immobilized you are by your mental constructs, by your beliefs - indeed this is why Robin cleans your clock every single time, albeit in his own way, gently, persistently reminding of how far your mental constructs, beliefs keep you away from reality, you are a sitting duck - I feel pity for you petty, vain minds suffering from incorrigible, contagious form of IED (Intellectual Enlightenment Disorder). Look at this interaction I had with a one Dr. Conway on Ammachi free speech list, as soon as I read him, I chuckled - I realized this was another case of IED that's been a scourge of this nation - and that he should be a piece of cake for me to handle, like Xeno I baited him - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7341 He feel hook, line and sinker - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7342 I decimated him (last few paras) - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7368 Poor bastard - I haven't heard back from him - probably retreated to the safety and solace of his neo-advaita brethren. As it stands now Robin I have disagreements on what Enlightenment is and I will not allow sickly, delirious patients of IED such as yourself to muddy the waters here. I'll come hard at you Xeno - every single time, at my fancy, at my pleasure. Because unlike your mental constructs such as this gem here - I do find Ravi particularly annoying, but I have the choice (in free-will terms) to ignore him ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301358) - I don't live in my head. I love you baby. Ravi. On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartax...@yahoo.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: OMG, what a bunch of clueless, vain, petty fools - Bhairitu Xeno, dear Judy, I bow down to your patience in dealing with these petty mind, utterly threatened by Robin's brilliance. St. Share or St. Judy - oh no what a dilemma? Hi Ravi. Long time no see. I am not threatened by Robin's brilliance. I was speaking of my general impression of him, not attempting to refute what he says. Having said I did find dumbaz's gags very funny, laughing loud reading another one his posts, the one Share responded to, while waiting for my dinner order here at a restaurant. That these morons are so stuck in their heads is really sad - they could have just had fun, come with witty responses, retorts but all we have is their repugnant prejudices exposed in such a pathetic fashion. It always baffles me when I see people taking Xeno's mental constructs so seriously and I know I have always been curious on how he interacts with normal people in his daily life, I have asked him before and all I got was more mental constructs. Nothing of what I say is really true, and indeed when I say anything it is presented as a mental construct. There is no way to speak without a mental constuct. Saying 'there is no way to speak without a mental construct' is a mental construct. And there is no daily life interaction on FFL, no interaction with normal people, there is only the symbolic structure of language rolling back and forth, so all I get from you, from, Judy, from Barry, etc., are mental constructs. Then one has to make something of those with what one has, and reply using one's own particular mental construct. You operate from the level of your gut perhaps more than anyone here. I do operate that way sometimes, but it is much more subdued especially compared to you, if I interpret the text you write here. It was perhaps that over-emotional style of yours that gets you booted off here at times. The human mind creates a world, and the separate worlds of human interaction do not line up in neat coherent rows. As I am like a separate alien universe to you, so you are to me, when comparing our mental styles. Our emotional palettes are vastly different. Azgrey's post(s) were rather interesting assaults on Robin. I felt the general tenor of the content somewhat appropriate, considering some of the other posts in a similar vein that were more direct, and based on those persons' having known Robin. Robin has the intellectual kutzpah to deal with that post. Judy was correct in that I cannot quite fathom Robin, but I am not sure she does either. I feel Judy is always down in the trenches, logically precise, but does not see the general sweep of the battle. I used to think in ways a lot like Judy. I was, and still am probably in a different way, insufferable. Judy does it with a scope and precision I could never have mustered. It takes too much energy. And how I interact with normal people in my daily life, well, that is a deep deep secret of the universe, hidden from the eyes of dear dear Ravi. Love, Ravi
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@ wrote: Nothing of what I say is really true, and indeed when I say anything it is presented as a mental construct. There is no way to speak without a mental constuct. Saying 'there is no way to speak without a mental construct' is a mental construct. And there is no daily life interaction on FFL, no interaction with normal people, there is only the symbolic structure of language rolling back and forth, so all I get from you, from, Judy, from Barry, etc., are mental constructs. Then one has to make something of those with what one has, and reply using one's own particular mental construct. Exactly. Believing that what you believe equals truth is the disease of Narcissism, not the onset of Enlightenment. http://tinyurl.com/csuezw3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEvoPLHIkYw
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Robin Carlsen maskedze...@yahoo.comwrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@ wrote: Nothing of what I say is really true, and indeed when I say anything it is presented as a mental construct. There is no way to speak without a mental constuct. Saying 'there is no way to speak without a mental construct' is a mental construct. And there is no daily life interaction on FFL, no interaction with normal people, there is only the symbolic structure of language rolling back and forth, so all I get from you, from, Judy, from Barry, etc., are mental constructs. Then one has to make something of those with what one has, and reply using one's own particular mental construct. Exactly. Believing that what you believe equals truth is the disease of Narcissism, not the onset of Enlightenment. http://tinyurl.com/csuezw3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEvoPLHIkYw This is awesome - thanks for the link, I will watch the whole thing - here's one of the gems I liked - *Is she pretty? She behaves as if she were beautiful, all American women do, it's the secret of their charm *:-)
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Oh my cold, heartless Xeno, It's unfortunate that you can't see how utterly immobilized you are by your mental constructs, by your beliefs - indeed this is why Robin cleans your clock every single time, albeit in his own way, gently, persistently reminding of how far your mental constructs, beliefs keep you away from reality, you are a sitting duck - I feel pity for you petty, vain minds suffering from incorrigible, contagious form of IED (Intellectual Enlightenment Disorder). Your humility, Ravi, is overpowering. Look at this interaction I had with a one Dr. Conway on Ammachi free speech list, as soon as I read him, I chuckled - I realized this was another case of IED that's been a scourge of this nation - and that he should be a piece of cake for me to handle, like Xeno I baited him - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7341 He feel hook, line and sinker - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7342 I decimated him (last few paras) - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7368 Poor bastard - I haven't heard back from him - probably retreated to the safety and solace of his neo-advaita brethren. As it stands now Robin I have disagreements on what Enlightenment is and I will not allow sickly, delirious patients of IED such as yourself to muddy the waters here. This is a nice, clear statement. What do you feel the points are upon which you disagree with Robin? And, if I muddy the waters here, as long as Rick and Alex let me be on this forum, I could muddy the waters as much as desired. But being cold and heartless, how much do you think I could really stir up? I'll come hard at you Xeno - every single time, at my fancy, at my pleasure. Because unlike your mental constructs such as this gem here - I do find Ravi particularly annoying, but I have the choice (in free-will terms) to ignore him ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301358) - I don't live in my head. As for the 'gem' above, that was written shortly before you were outed from here, and I did experience annoyance at your antics. The statement about free will was not entirely serious as I do not really believe in free will; I used the words because that is how I think most people experience choice, that is why the comment was in parentheses. Stating that you do not live in your head and are minus mental constructs does not meant that is true, I firmly hold that it is not possible to express yourself in language without mental concepts. You used the concept 'I' several times. You listed many of your accomplishments in decimating others' arguments; *I baited him. *he fell hook, line, and sinker *I decimated him Simple verbal abuse is not independent of concepts, and it does not require much intelligence either, you are being lazy. Maybe your work requires a lot of mental energy, and when you come here, it is easier not to think but to mindlessly emote. Seven months in the offline FFL cooler has not reduced your temperature much. But as you come back, you must like it here. Welcome. Mental constructs are a partial value of experience, they have a certain place. Experience has a more unbounded aspect, a more silent aspect. Even emotions are similar to mental constructs, they are more primitive and less focused than the intellect. They are also necessary for the experience of fulfillment; the intellect however well developed, cannot substitute for basic feeling. X I love you baby. Ravi. On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: OMG, what a bunch of clueless, vain, petty fools - Bhairitu Xeno, dear Judy, I bow down to your patience in dealing with these petty mind, utterly threatened by Robin's brilliance. St. Share or St. Judy - oh no what a dilemma? Hi Ravi. Long time no see. I am not threatened by Robin's brilliance. I was speaking of my general impression of him, not attempting to refute what he says. Having said I did find dumbaz's gags very funny, laughing loud reading another one his posts, the one Share responded to, while waiting for my dinner order here at a restaurant. That these morons are so stuck in their heads is really sad - they could have just had fun, come with witty responses, retorts but all we have is their repugnant prejudices exposed in such a pathetic fashion. It always baffles me when I see people taking Xeno's mental constructs so seriously and I know I have always been curious on how he interacts with normal people in his daily life, I have asked him before and all I got was more mental constructs. Nothing of what I say is really true, and indeed when I say anything it is presented as a mental construct. There is no way to speak
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
Now, I like this Xeno ! Now you are finally starting to show some heart..keep at it !!! Perhaps one day I will indulge in intellectual discussions with you, not right now because you already burdened by your muddled, muddied, meanderings - like Robin says, first be true to your first person ontology, let the reality in baby. Love, Ravi. On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartax...@yahoo.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Oh my cold, heartless Xeno, It's unfortunate that you can't see how utterly immobilized you are by your mental constructs, by your beliefs - indeed this is why Robin cleans your clock every single time, albeit in his own way, gently, persistently reminding of how far your mental constructs, beliefs keep you away from reality, you are a sitting duck - I feel pity for you petty, vain minds suffering from incorrigible, contagious form of IED (Intellectual Enlightenment Disorder). Your humility, Ravi, is overpowering. Look at this interaction I had with a one Dr. Conway on Ammachi free speech list, as soon as I read him, I chuckled - I realized this was another case of IED that's been a scourge of this nation - and that he should be a piece of cake for me to handle, like Xeno I baited him - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7341 He feel hook, line and sinker - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7342 I decimated him (last few paras) - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7368 Poor bastard - I haven't heard back from him - probably retreated to the safety and solace of his neo-advaita brethren. As it stands now Robin I have disagreements on what Enlightenment is and I will not allow sickly, delirious patients of IED such as yourself to muddy the waters here. This is a nice, clear statement. What do you feel the points are upon which you disagree with Robin? And, if I muddy the waters here, as long as Rick and Alex let me be on this forum, I could muddy the waters as much as desired. But being cold and heartless, how much do you think I could really stir up? I'll come hard at you Xeno - every single time, at my fancy, at my pleasure. Because unlike your mental constructs such as this gem here - I do find Ravi particularly annoying, but I have the choice (in free-will terms) to ignore him ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301358) - I don't live in my head. As for the 'gem' above, that was written shortly before you were outed from here, and I did experience annoyance at your antics. The statement about free will was not entirely serious as I do not really believe in free will; I used the words because that is how I think most people experience choice, that is why the comment was in parentheses. Stating that you do not live in your head and are minus mental constructs does not meant that is true, I firmly hold that it is not possible to express yourself in language without mental concepts. You used the concept 'I' several times. You listed many of your accomplishments in decimating others' arguments; *I baited him. *he fell hook, line, and sinker *I decimated him Simple verbal abuse is not independent of concepts, and it does not require much intelligence either, you are being lazy. Maybe your work requires a lot of mental energy, and when you come here, it is easier not to think but to mindlessly emote. Seven months in the offline FFL cooler has not reduced your temperature much. But as you come back, you must like it here. Welcome. Mental constructs are a partial value of experience, they have a certain place. Experience has a more unbounded aspect, a more silent aspect. Even emotions are similar to mental constructs, they are more primitive and less focused than the intellect. They are also necessary for the experience of fulfillment; the intellect however well developed, cannot substitute for basic feeling. X I love you baby. Ravi. On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@ wrote: OMG, what a bunch of clueless, vain, petty fools - Bhairitu Xeno, dear Judy, I bow down to your patience in dealing with these petty mind, utterly threatened by Robin's brilliance. St. Share or St. Judy - oh no what a dilemma? Hi Ravi. Long time no see. I am not threatened by Robin's brilliance. I was speaking of my general impression of him, not attempting to refute what he says. Having said I did find dumbaz's gags very funny, laughing loud reading another one his posts, the one Share responded to, while waiting for my dinner order here at a restaurant. That these morons are so stuck in their heads is really sad - they could
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
And Xeno baby - I have never claimed humility, I'm no Dalai Lama who masquerades as humble to beguile, bewitch the naive, gullible Westerners, for their money, for their support. However I have explained myself as thus - my supreme arrogance yet genuine humility - in fact I feel my humility is merely a product of my arrogance. You most likely don't have kids - but think like a parent. A parent is both arrogant and genuinely humble towards his children, because the children are but his/her creation, you can never, ever take away the sense of ownership, the subjective sense of ownership, the parent feels towards his kids. Once someone, in reference to my mystical exploits, asked how I feel - I said - I feel like I own your ass. I was born arrogant, my mother, my siblings, only served to reinforce this arrogance, but the existence punished me, rightly so, and I was humiliated, harassed, hounded to learn humility, to respect authority, to learn the rules of the game, to work within them. I'm forever mobile, free, soaring. I'm no slave to anyone, unlike your darling Dolly Lama. Love, Ravi On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:29 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.comwrote: Now, I like this Xeno ! Now you are finally starting to show some heart..keep at it !!! Perhaps one day I will indulge in intellectual discussions with you, not right now because you already burdened by your muddled, muddied, meanderings - like Robin says, first be true to your first person ontology, let the reality in baby. Love, Ravi. On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 12:23 PM, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartax...@yahoo.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: Oh my cold, heartless Xeno, It's unfortunate that you can't see how utterly immobilized you are by your mental constructs, by your beliefs - indeed this is why Robin cleans your clock every single time, albeit in his own way, gently, persistently reminding of how far your mental constructs, beliefs keep you away from reality, you are a sitting duck - I feel pity for you petty, vain minds suffering from incorrigible, contagious form of IED (Intellectual Enlightenment Disorder). Your humility, Ravi, is overpowering. Look at this interaction I had with a one Dr. Conway on Ammachi free speech list, as soon as I read him, I chuckled - I realized this was another case of IED that's been a scourge of this nation - and that he should be a piece of cake for me to handle, like Xeno I baited him - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7341 He feel hook, line and sinker - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7342 I decimated him (last few paras) - http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ammachi_free_speech_zone/message/7368 Poor bastard - I haven't heard back from him - probably retreated to the safety and solace of his neo-advaita brethren. As it stands now Robin I have disagreements on what Enlightenment is and I will not allow sickly, delirious patients of IED such as yourself to muddy the waters here. This is a nice, clear statement. What do you feel the points are upon which you disagree with Robin? And, if I muddy the waters here, as long as Rick and Alex let me be on this forum, I could muddy the waters as much as desired. But being cold and heartless, how much do you think I could really stir up? I'll come hard at you Xeno - every single time, at my fancy, at my pleasure. Because unlike your mental constructs such as this gem here - I do find Ravi particularly annoying, but I have the choice (in free-will terms) to ignore him ( http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/message/301358) - I don't live in my head. As for the 'gem' above, that was written shortly before you were outed from here, and I did experience annoyance at your antics. The statement about free will was not entirely serious as I do not really believe in free will; I used the words because that is how I think most people experience choice, that is why the comment was in parentheses. Stating that you do not live in your head and are minus mental constructs does not meant that is true, I firmly hold that it is not possible to express yourself in language without mental concepts. You used the concept 'I' several times. You listed many of your accomplishments in decimating others' arguments; *I baited him. *he fell hook, line, and sinker *I decimated him Simple verbal abuse is not independent of concepts, and it does not require much intelligence either, you are being lazy. Maybe your work requires a lot of mental energy, and when you come here, it is easier not to think but to mindlessly emote. Seven months in the offline FFL cooler has not reduced your temperature much. But as you come back, you must like it here. Welcome. Mental constructs are a partial value of experience, they have a certain
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: On Sun, Aug 19, 2012 at 11:46 AM, Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@...wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: Believing that what you believe equals truth is the disease of Narcissism, not the onset of Enlightenment. http://tinyurl.com/csuezw3 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UEvoPLHIkYw This is awesome - thanks for the link, I will watch the whole thing - here's one of the gems I liked - *Is she pretty? She behaves as if she were beautiful, all American women do, it's the secret of their charm *:-) Great line. It's a brilliant production. I cheated and watched the last part, and it's so well done compared to some other versions I've seen. The credits say it was Dramatised by John Osborne. Not sure what that means--I guess that he wrote the screenplay from the novel? Because the script is superb.
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
So, it's all about Robin. azgrey: Robin W Carlsen... sniped 2000 words
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@... wrote: So, it's all about Robin. Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see how many others do. azgrey: Robin W Carlsen... sniped 2000 words
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@ wrote: So, it's all about Robin. Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see how many others do. http://youtu.be/N0O--UueuNI azgrey: Robin W Carlsen... sniped 2000 words
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, raunchydog raunchydog@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@ wrote: So, it's all about Robin. Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see how many others do. http://youtu.be/N0O--UueuNI Exactly. azgrey: Robin W Carlsen... sniped 2000 words
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: You abhorrent, abominable, appalling, awful, baseborn, common, disgusting, distasteful, dreadful, evil, foul, fulsome, gross, hideous, horrendous, horrible, horrid, ignoble, inferior, loathsome, low, lowborn, lower-class, low-life, lowly, lumpen, mean, nasty, nauseating, nauseous, noisome, noxious, obnoxious, obscene, odious, offensive, plebeian, prole, proletarian, rancid, repellent, repugnant, repulsive, revolting, scandalous, shocking, sickening, ugly, unwashed, vulgar, imbecile, minute-man, dumbaz. Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. I always used to chuckle when I said to friends that I lived in a meditation centre and they'd go wow it must be really relaxing and full of cool laidback people And I'd say, oh yeah really ever seen One flew over the cuckoo's nest?
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: You abhorrent, abominable, appalling, awful, baseborn, common, disgusting, distasteful, dreadful, evil, foul, fulsome, gross, hideous, horrendous, horrible, horrid, ignoble, inferior, loathsome, low, lowborn, lower-class, low-life, lowly, lumpen, mean, nasty, nauseating, nauseous, noisome, noxious, obnoxious, obscene, odious, offensive, plebeian, prole, proletarian, rancid, repellent, repugnant, repulsive, revolting, scandalous, shocking, sickening, ugly, unwashed, vulgar, imbecile, minute-man, dumbaz. Hey, the last three are out of alpha order. ;-) On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:33 AM, azgrey no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass tacks: It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces his underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the chains they revere. A related observation is that there's something fishy about Robin's insults. I think he's up to something, something beer-guzzling and perhaps even shameless. Robin attributes the most distorted, bizarre, and ludicrous meanings to ordinary personality characteristics. For example, if you're shy, he calls you fearful and withdrawn. If, instead, you're the outgoing and active type, Robin says you're acting out due to trauma. Why does he say such things? This is an important question because if you read between the lines of his ploys, you'll really find that if we don't offer true constructive criticismâlistening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problemâthen Robin will impinge upon our daily lives. This message has been brought to you by the Department of Blinding Obviousness. What might not be so obvious, however, is that Robin doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. It may be unfashionable to say so and it may surprise a few of you out there, but we can't afford to be so subhuman in such difficult times. Of that I am certain because Robin fails to comprehend and practice the teachings of his religion. More precisely, he conveniently forgets his religion's messages of peace, love, compassion, acceptance, and forgivenessâor, at best, misremembers them as an edict to set the wolf to mind the sheep. If he makes fun of me or insults me I hear it, and it hurts. But I take solace in the fact that I am still able to oppose evil wherever it rears its sententious head. Even when Robin isn't lying, he's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of the ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice of scornful misosophists. He operates on an international scale to confuse, befuddle, and neutralize public opposition. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale but to celebrate knowledge and truth for the sake of knowledge and truth. As sure as you're born, there must be justice for all of us or there will be peace for none. For that reason, his helpers are unified under a common goal. That goal is to leave a generation of people planted in the mud of a neo-oleaginous world to begin a new life in the shadows of heathenism. Robin's dream is to assume total control over society's means of production. Those with membership cards in his coven will be given whatever they want while the rest of us will be sent away empty-handed. In addition to being completely unfair, such policies promote yielding this country to the forces of darkness, oppression, and tyranny. Furthermore, he once had the audacity to tell me that metanarratives are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. My riposte was that if you read his writings while mentally out of focus, you may get the sense that hanging out with crude palookas is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. But if you read Robin's writings while mentally in focus and weigh each point carefully, it's clear that I personally unequivocally have no appetite for conditioning the publicâor, more precisely, brainwashing the
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
I know I'm sad dear Judy :-) I was just following typical minuteman strategies of his cut paste glories. Don't know how else to deal with these guys - now we have the dribbling, driveling, drooling, rabid, slobbering, salivating, salyavin - who seems to want to rehabilitate himself here - god have mercy on these souls. On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:55 PM, authfriend jst...@panix.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: You abhorrent, abominable, appalling, awful, baseborn, common, disgusting, distasteful, dreadful, evil, foul, fulsome, gross, hideous, horrendous, horrible, horrid, ignoble, inferior, loathsome, low, lowborn, lower-class, low-life, lowly, lumpen, mean, nasty, nauseating, nauseous, noisome, noxious, obnoxious, obscene, odious, offensive, plebeian, prole, proletarian, rancid, repellent, repugnant, repulsive, revolting, scandalous, shocking, sickening, ugly, unwashed, vulgar, imbecile, minute-man, dumbaz. Hey, the last three are out of alpha order. ;-) On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 10:33 AM, azgrey no_re...@yahoogroups.com wrote: ** Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass tacks: It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces his underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the chains they revere. A related observation is that there's something fishy about Robin's insults. I think he's up to something, something beer-guzzling and perhaps even shameless. Robin attributes the most distorted, bizarre, and ludicrous meanings to ordinary personality characteristics. For example, if you're shy, he calls you fearful and withdrawn. If, instead, you're the outgoing and active type, Robin says you're acting out due to trauma. Why does he say such things? This is an important question because if you read between the lines of his ploys, you'll really find that if we don't offer true constructive criticismâ€listening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problemâ€then Robin will impinge upon our daily lives. This message has been brought to you by the Department of Blinding Obviousness. What might not be so obvious, however, is that Robin doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. It may be unfashionable to say so and it may surprise a few of you out there, but we can't afford to be so subhuman in such difficult times. Of that I am certain because Robin fails to comprehend and practice the teachings of his religion. More precisely, he conveniently forgets his religion's messages of peace, love, compassion, acceptance, and forgivenessâ€or, at best, misremembers them as an edict to set the wolf to mind the sheep. If he makes fun of me or insults me I hear it, and it hurts. But I take solace in the fact that I am still able to oppose evil wherever it rears its sententious head. Even when Robin isn't lying, he's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of the ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice of scornful misosophists. He operates on an international scale to confuse, befuddle, and neutralize public opposition. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale but to celebrate knowledge and truth for the sake of knowledge and truth. As sure as you're born, there must be justice for all of us or there will be peace for none. For that reason, his helpers are unified under a common goal. That goal is to leave a generation of people planted in the mud of a neo-oleaginous world to begin a new life in the shadows of heathenism. Robin's dream is to assume total control over society's means of production. Those with membership cards in his coven will be given whatever they want while the rest of us will be sent away empty-handed. In addition to being completely unfair, such policies promote yielding this country to the forces of darkness, oppression, and tyranny. Furthermore, he once had the audacity to tell me that metanarratives are the root of
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:54 PM, salyavin808 fintlewoodle...@mail.comwrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: You abhorrent, abominable, appalling, awful, baseborn, common, disgusting, distasteful, dreadful, evil, foul, fulsome, gross, hideous, horrendous, horrible, horrid, ignoble, inferior, loathsome, low, lowborn, lower-class, low-life, lowly, lumpen, mean, nasty, nauseating, nauseous, noisome, noxious, obnoxious, obscene, odious, offensive, plebeian, prole, proletarian, rancid, repellent, repugnant, repulsive, revolting, scandalous, shocking, sickening, ugly, unwashed, vulgar, imbecile, minute-man, dumbaz. Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. I always used to chuckle when I said to friends that I lived in a meditation centre and they'd go wow it must be really relaxing and full of cool laidback people And I'd say, oh yeah really ever seen One flew over the cuckoo's nest? You are welcome - is it OK to pet you?
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
RESPONSE: http://tinyurl.com/8f6mylx http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyai4V4d9T4 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@... wrote: Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass tacks: It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces his underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the chains they revere. A related observation is that there's something fishy about Robin's insults. I think he's up to something, something beer-guzzling and perhaps even shameless. Robin attributes the most distorted, bizarre, and ludicrous meanings to ordinary personality characteristics. For example, if you're shy, he calls you fearful and withdrawn. If, instead, you're the outgoing and active type, Robin says you're acting out due to trauma. Why does he say such things? This is an important question because if you read between the lines of his ploys, you'll really find that if we don't offer true constructive criticismlistening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problemthen Robin will impinge upon our daily lives. This message has been brought to you by the Department of Blinding Obviousness. What might not be so obvious, however, is that Robin doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. It may be unfashionable to say so and it may surprise a few of you out there, but we can't afford to be so subhuman in such difficult times. Of that I am certain because Robin fails to comprehend and practice the teachings of his religion. More precisely, he conveniently forgets his religion's messages of peace, love, compassion, acceptance, and forgivenessor, at best, misremembers them as an edict to set the wolf to mind the sheep. If he makes fun of me or insults me I hear it, and it hurts. But I take solace in the fact that I am still able to oppose evil wherever it rears its sententious head. Even when Robin isn't lying, he's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of the ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice of scornful misosophists. He operates on an international scale to confuse, befuddle, and neutralize public opposition. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale but to celebrate knowledge and truth for the sake of knowledge and truth. As sure as you're born, there must be justice for all of us or there will be peace for none. For that reason, his helpers are unified under a common goal. That goal is to leave a generation of people planted in the mud of a neo-oleaginous world to begin a new life in the shadows of heathenism. Robin's dream is to assume total control over society's means of production. Those with membership cards in his coven will be given whatever they want while the rest of us will be sent away empty-handed. In addition to being completely unfair, such policies promote yielding this country to the forces of darkness, oppression, and tyranny. Furthermore, he once had the audacity to tell me that metanarratives are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. My riposte was that if you read his writings while mentally out of focus, you may get the sense that hanging out with crude palookas is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. But if you read Robin's writings while mentally in focus and weigh each point carefully, it's clear that I personally unequivocally have no appetite for conditioning the publicor, more precisely, brainwashing the publicinto believing that society is supposed to be lenient towards unreasonable tosspots. Many sinful televangelists, however, do. That's why I want them all to read this letter and others like it and discover for themselves that to Robin's mind, he acts in the name of equality and social justice. So that means that he can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion, right? No, not right. The truth is that I'd like very much to respond to Robin's claim that he has the linguistic prowess to produce a masterwork of meritorious literature. Unfortunately, taking into account
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:00 PM, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.r...@gmail.comwrote: On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:54 PM, salyavin808 fintlewoodle...@mail.comwrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Ravi Chivukula chivukula.ravi@... wrote: You abhorrent, abominable, appalling, awful, baseborn, common, disgusting, distasteful, dreadful, evil, foul, fulsome, gross, hideous, horrendous, horrible, horrid, ignoble, inferior, loathsome, low, lowborn, lower-class, low-life, lowly, lumpen, mean, nasty, nauseating, nauseous, noisome, noxious, obnoxious, obscene, odious, offensive, plebeian, prole, proletarian, rancid, repellent, repugnant, repulsive, revolting, scandalous, shocking, sickening, ugly, unwashed, vulgar, imbecile, minute-man, dumbaz. Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. I always used to chuckle when I said to friends that I lived in a meditation centre and they'd go wow it must be really relaxing and full of cool laidback people And I'd say, oh yeah really ever seen One flew over the cuckoo's nest? You are welcome - is it OK to pet you? Oh how dumb of me, you poor creature. Though as the caretaker of this institution we welcome pleasant, delightful creatures such as yourself - bringing joy, happiness to our members, I was literally barking at the wrong creature. I will speak to your master, since there are some concerns about you that have been brought to my attention, make sure your shots are current and you have been duly registered. And then we will all pet you, OK? I promise.
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@... wrote: RESPONSE: http://tinyurl.com/8f6mylx http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyai4V4d9T4 LOL. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, azgrey no_reply@ wrote: Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass tacks: It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces his underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the chains they revere. A related observation is that there's something fishy about Robin's insults. I think he's up to something, something beer-guzzling and perhaps even shameless. Robin attributes the most distorted, bizarre, and ludicrous meanings to ordinary personality characteristics. For example, if you're shy, he calls you fearful and withdrawn. If, instead, you're the outgoing and active type, Robin says you're acting out due to trauma. Why does he say such things? This is an important question because if you read between the lines of his ploys, you'll really find that if we don't offer true constructive criticismlistening to the whole issue, recognizing the problems, recognizing what is being done right, and getting involved to help remedy the problemthen Robin will impinge upon our daily lives. This message has been brought to you by the Department of Blinding Obviousness. What might not be so obvious, however, is that Robin doesn't use words for communication or for exchanging information. He uses them to disarm, to hypnotize, to mislead, and to deceive. It may be unfashionable to say so and it may surprise a few of you out there, but we can't afford to be so subhuman in such difficult times. Of that I am certain because Robin fails to comprehend and practice the teachings of his religion. More precisely, he conveniently forgets his religion's messages of peace, love, compassion, acceptance, and forgivenessor, at best, misremembers them as an edict to set the wolf to mind the sheep. If he makes fun of me or insults me I hear it, and it hurts. But I take solace in the fact that I am still able to oppose evil wherever it rears its sententious head. Even when Robin isn't lying, he's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable him to entangle our peace and prosperity in the toils of the ambition, rivalship, interest, humor, or caprice of scornful misosophists. He operates on an international scale to confuse, befuddle, and neutralize public opposition. It's only fitting, therefore, that we, too, work on an international scale but to celebrate knowledge and truth for the sake of knowledge and truth. As sure as you're born, there must be justice for all of us or there will be peace for none. For that reason, his helpers are unified under a common goal. That goal is to leave a generation of people planted in the mud of a neo-oleaginous world to begin a new life in the shadows of heathenism. Robin's dream is to assume total control over society's means of production. Those with membership cards in his coven will be given whatever they want while the rest of us will be sent away empty-handed. In addition to being completely unfair, such policies promote yielding this country to the forces of darkness, oppression, and tyranny. Furthermore, he once had the audacity to tell me that metanarratives are the root of tyranny, lawlessness, overpopulation, racial hatred, world hunger, disease, and rank stupidity. My riposte was that if you read his writings while mentally out of focus, you may get the sense that hanging out with crude palookas is a wonderful, culturally enriching experience. But if you read Robin's writings while mentally in focus and weigh each point carefully, it's clear that I personally unequivocally have no appetite for conditioning the publicor, more precisely, brainwashing the publicinto believing that society is supposed to be lenient towards unreasonable tosspots. Many sinful televangelists, however, do. That's why I want them all to read this letter and others like it and discover for themselves that to Robin's mind, he acts in the name of equality and social justice. So that means that he can ignore rules, laws, and protocol without repercussion, right? No, not right. The truth is that I'd like very much
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 1:40 PM, authfriend jst...@panix.com wrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Robin Carlsen maskedzebra@... wrote: RESPONSE: http://tinyurl.com/8f6mylx http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kyai4V4d9T4 LOL. Awesomethanks for the laughs.
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@... wrote: Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. It's pretty scary, isn't it?
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote: Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. It's pretty scary, isn't it? Everybody's crazy but me and thee, Samanthy, and sometimes I think even thee is a little strange.
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
RESPONSE: http://tinyurl.com/br4uaxn http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LmE0oAtY5L4feature=bf_prevlist=PL0 F2FF285A8044D5B --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote: Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. It's pretty scary, isn't it?
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 2:18 PM, turquoiseb no_re...@yahoogroups.comwrote: ** --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@... wrote: Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. It's pretty scary, isn't it? You are welcome too..I know it's scary, it was for salyavaating too..but you too like the fun, thrill of this scary place. Anyway I, as the caretaker of this institution, am proud to say that, we do not care, we do not discriminate, the innocence of a emotionally stunted 64 years old, we consider it the same as that of a drooling, gentle, salivating creature - the joy, the peace, the fun they bring to our members, this is our commitment. Not it's way past your bed time Barry, beat it !!
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
Now Battly, Let's be calm. There's no need to be scared at your mental hospital. It's here to help you get better. Don't be frightened of the doctors and nurses. They will give you something to make thins less scary for you. We all know that you are afraid all of the time, but that can change. No one is here to hurt you, we want to help you. If you're thinking thoughts that frighten you, you can talk about them. It will help. Doctor, Doctor!! He's completely delusional! Believes everyone is against him. Can't listen. Constant rage! I've never seen such an extrme case. Get the straightjacket! --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote: Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. It's pretty scary, isn't it?
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote: Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. It's pretty scary, isn't it? Yep, some of it reminds me of an Austrian wannabe painter... ;D
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote: Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. It's pretty scary, isn't it? Everybody's crazy but me and thee, Samanthy, and sometimes I think even thee is a little strange. Jesus, I go to Vancouver for 8 hours I'm sitting on the ferry and take a peek at FFL and all hell has broken loose. Now will you all get back in your cages and stop terrorizing the orderlies. This is the last time I leave you all unattended and AZ, we need to have a talk. There's a law against plagiarism and inciting the loonies to riot. Now settle down, I'll figure out all of your punishments tomorrow. (this has not been easy typing this on a damn iPhone by the way.)
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote: Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. It's pretty scary, isn't it? Everybody's crazy but me and thee, Samanthy, and sometimes I think even thee is a little strange. Jesus, I go to Vancouver for 8 hours I'm sitting on the ferry and take a peek at FFL and all hell has broken loose. Now will you all get back in your cages and stop terrorizing the orderlies. This is the last time I leave you all unattended and AZ, we need to have a talk. There's a law against plagiarism and inciting the loonies to riot. Now settle down, I'll figure out all of your punishments tomorrow. (this has not been easy typing this on a damn iPhone by the way.) http://youtu.be/ryZky0y4ERg
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
Ann, In my earlier report, I indicated that all of the orderlies were occupied caring for Batty (Cooincidental name, don't you think?). Batty has been having a rough-life-of-it, I have come to understand. It has taken me a lot of time and effort to get the facts on Batty, but I can assure that these words are true as best as I can ascertain. He's even provided his photo, hometown, and movements. --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, awoelflebater no_reply@... wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, authfriend jstein@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, turquoiseb no_reply@ wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, salyavin808 fintlewoodlewix@ wrote: Honest to god visiting FFL is like visiting a mental hospital. It's pretty scary, isn't it? Everybody's crazy but me and thee, Samanthy, and sometimes I think even thee is a little strange. Jesus, I go to Vancouver for 8 hours I'm sitting on the ferry and take a peek at FFL and all hell has broken loose. Now will you all get back in your cages and stop terrorizing the orderlies. This is the last time I leave you all unattended and AZ, we need to have a talk. There's a law against plagiarism and inciting the loonies to riot. Now settle down, I'll figure out all of your punishments tomorrow. (this has not been easy typing this on a damn iPhone by the way.)
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
On 08/18/2012 11:33 AM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@... wrote: So, it's all about Robin. Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see how many others do. Well gee Willy, I guess if Judy sez that it must be true. That despite the fact that the post I quoted had the word Robin in it some 47 times. Guess Judy must have read it as Tobin (or did she read it at all)? :-D
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: On 08/18/2012 11:33 AM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@ wrote: So, it's all about Robin. Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see how many others do. Well gee Willy, I guess if Judy sez that it must be true. That despite the fact that the post I quoted had the word Robin in it some 47 times. Guess Judy must have read it as Tobin (or did she read it at all)? :-D Somehow I don't think az expected that Bhairitu would be one of the folks who would fall for the gag, but I could have told az he might, given his propensity to believe in nutty conspiracy theories. Still, it's hard to fathom how anybody with two brain cells to rub together could have read even just the first paragraph and thought it was about Robin. Heck, the second sentence in the first paragraph should have been enough to clue folks in that something wasn't kosher, even if their reading skills were so deficient as to prevent them from being able to decode Robin's message. The real stunner, however, is Bhairitu's claim above, that the appearance of Robin's name in the post is enough to demonstrate that it's about Robin. I mean, it boggles the mind. You just wouldn't expect that kind of stupidity from someone who had managed to make a solid career for themselves. A few highlights: Bhairitu found employment as a musician at various clubs in the Village, as well as earning acting roles in film. His made his debut on the silver screen in Abel Ferrara's China Girl, for which he also wrote the end-credit song Midnight. Bhairitu went on to collaborate with Ferrara on several film and music projects, including: Bad Lieutenant, in which Bhairitu played Jesus Christ and co-wrote the end-credits song; Body Snatchers, which featured the song I Want You Back; and The Funeral, which saw Bhairitu co-starring with Christopher Walken, Isabella Rosselini, Benicio del Toro and Vincent Gallo. Bhairitu then co-starred in the off-Broadway show A Minor Incident with legendary songwriter Carole King, who was making her stage debut in the play. The two collaborated on songs for her Capitol Records release City Streets, including the song I Can't Stop Thinking About You, which Bhairitu co-wrote and plays guitar and performs backing vocals on. It was on stage with Carole King at London's Royal Albert Hall that Bhairitu was spotted by the producers of a new West End musical Buddy: The Buddy Holly Story. Buddy opened to rave reviews on 12 October 1989, at The Victoria Palace Theater. Bhairitu's turn in the title role of Buddy Holly earned him a nomination for the Laurence Olivier Award for Outstanding Performance by an Actor in a Musical. The following year, Buddy at Broadway's Shubert Theater in New York, and Bhairitu was nominated for a Tony Award for his performance, as well as winning the Theater World Award for Best Broadway Debut. After Buddy, Bhairitu appeared in the films Fathers Sons, with Jeff Goldblum, and as Jesus Christ opposite Harvey Keitel in Abel Ferrara's Bad Lieutenant, for which he also performed and co-wrote the title song, Bad Lieutenant with Ferrara. Bhairitu also appeared as Gene Vincent opposite Donal Logue (as Eddie Cochran) in the play Be-Bop-A-Lula at Hollywood's famed Theater/Theater before returning to the London stage for the 25th anniversary revival of Hair at the Old Vic, in the role of Berger.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
On 08/18/2012 05:42 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: On 08/18/2012 11:33 AM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@ wrote: So, it's all about Robin. Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see how many others do. Well gee Willy, I guess if Judy sez that it must be true. That despite the fact that the post I quoted had the word Robin in it some 47 times. Guess Judy must have read it as Tobin (or did she read it at all)? :-D Somehow I don't think az expected that Bhairitu would be one of the folks who would fall for the gag, but I could have told az he might, given his propensity to believe in nutty conspiracy theories. Still, it's hard to fathom how anybody with two brain cells to rub together could have read even just the first paragraph and thought it was about Robin. Heck, the second sentence in the first paragraph should have been enough to clue folks in that something wasn't kosher, even if their reading skills were so deficient as to prevent them from being able to decode Robin's message. The real stunner, however, is Bhairitu's claim above, that the appearance of Robin's name in the post is enough to demonstrate that it's about Robin. I mean, it boggles the mind. You just wouldn't expect that kind of stupidity from someone who had managed to make a solid career for themselves. A few highlights: Bhairitu found employment as a musician at various clubs in the Village, as well as earning acting roles in film. His made his debut on the silver screen in Abel Ferrara's China Girl, for which he also wrote the end-credit song Midnight. Bhairitu went on to collaborate with Ferrara on several film and music projects, including: Bad Lieutenant, in which Bhairitu played Jesus Christ and co-wrote the end-credits song; Body Snatchers, which featured the song I Want You Back; and The Funeral, which saw Bhairitu co-starring with Christopher Walken, Isabella Rosselini, Benicio del Toro and Vincent Gallo. Bhairitu then co-starred in the off-Broadway show A Minor Incident with legendary songwriter Carole King, who was making her stage debut in the play. The two collaborated on songs for her Capitol Records release City Streets, including the song I Can't Stop Thinking About You, which Bhairitu co-wrote and plays guitar and performs backing vocals on. It was on stage with Carole King at London's Royal Albert Hall that Bhairitu was spotted by the producers of a new West End musical Buddy: The Buddy Holly Story. Buddy opened to rave reviews on 12 October 1989, at The Victoria Palace Theater. Bhairitu's turn in the title role of Buddy Holly earned him a nomination for the Laurence Olivier Award for Outstanding Performance by an Actor in a Musical. The following year, Buddy at Broadway's Shubert Theater in New York, and Bhairitu was nominated for a Tony Award for his performance, as well as winning the Theater World Award for Best Broadway Debut. After Buddy, Bhairitu appeared in the films Fathers Sons, with Jeff Goldblum, and as Jesus Christ opposite Harvey Keitel in Abel Ferrara's Bad Lieutenant, for which he also performed and co-wrote the title song, Bad Lieutenant with Ferrara. Bhairitu also appeared as Gene Vincent opposite Donal Logue (as Eddie Cochran) in the play Be-Bop-A-Lula at Hollywood's famed Theater/Theater before returning to the London stage for the 25th anniversary revival of Hair at the Old Vic, in the role of Berger. That might have been a fun career but it wasn't mine. I don't know of anyone really named Bhairitu. It's just a Hinduzation of Barry2. Could break it down to being Bhai for brother and Ritu which is an Indian name albeit for a woman which would of course extend the joke further as brother Ritu for some cognitive dissonance. What fun! Judy goes further into the ozone. Here is the first paragraph she is talking about: Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass tacks: It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces his underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the chains they revere. A related observation is that there's something fishy about Robin's insults. I think he's up to something, something beer-guzzling and perhaps even shameless. Now who is that about? Maybe Judy is confused with some other post.
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: On 08/18/2012 05:42 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: On 08/18/2012 11:33 AM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@ wrote: So, it's all about Robin. Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see how many others do. Well gee Willy, I guess if Judy sez that it must be true. That despite the fact that the post I quoted had the word Robin in it some 47 times. Guess Judy must have read it as Tobin (or did she read it at all)? :-D Somehow I don't think az expected that Bhairitu would be one of the folks who would fall for the gag, but I could have told az he might, given his propensity to believe in nutty conspiracy theories. Still, it's hard to fathom how anybody with two brain cells to rub together could have read even just the first paragraph and thought it was about Robin. Heck, the second sentence in the first paragraph should have been enough to clue folks in that something wasn't kosher, even if their reading skills were so deficient as to prevent them from being able to decode Robin's message. The real stunner, however, is Bhairitu's claim above, that the appearance of Robin's name in the post is enough to demonstrate that it's about Robin. I mean, it boggles the mind. You just wouldn't expect that kind of stupidity from someone who had managed to make a solid career for themselves. A few highlights: Bhairitu found employment as a musician at various clubs in the Village, as well as earning acting roles in film. His made his debut on the silver screen in Abel Ferrara's China Girl, for which he also wrote the end-credit song Midnight. Bhairitu went on to collaborate with Ferrara on several film and music projects, including: Bad Lieutenant, in which Bhairitu played Jesus Christ and co-wrote the end-credits song; Body Snatchers, which featured the song I Want You Back; and The Funeral, which saw Bhairitu co-starring with Christopher Walken, Isabella Rosselini, Benicio del Toro and Vincent Gallo. Bhairitu then co-starred in the off-Broadway show A Minor Incident with legendary songwriter Carole King, who was making her stage debut in the play. The two collaborated on songs for her Capitol Records release City Streets, including the song I Can't Stop Thinking About You, which Bhairitu co-wrote and plays guitar and performs backing vocals on. It was on stage with Carole King at London's Royal Albert Hall that Bhairitu was spotted by the producers of a new West End musical Buddy: The Buddy Holly Story. Buddy opened to rave reviews on 12 October 1989, at The Victoria Palace Theater. Bhairitu's turn in the title role of Buddy Holly earned him a nomination for the Laurence Olivier Award for Outstanding Performance by an Actor in a Musical. The following year, Buddy at Broadway's Shubert Theater in New York, and Bhairitu was nominated for a Tony Award for his performance, as well as winning the Theater World Award for Best Broadway Debut. After Buddy, Bhairitu appeared in the films Fathers Sons, with Jeff Goldblum, and as Jesus Christ opposite Harvey Keitel in Abel Ferrara's Bad Lieutenant, for which he also performed and co-wrote the title song, Bad Lieutenant with Ferrara. Bhairitu also appeared as Gene Vincent opposite Donal Logue (as Eddie Cochran) in the play Be-Bop-A-Lula at Hollywood's famed Theater/Theater before returning to the London stage for the 25th anniversary revival of Hair at the Old Vic, in the role of Berger. That might have been a fun career but it wasn't mine. Your name appears in it 11 times (it's much shorter than az's post). I don't know of anyone really named Bhairitu. It originally said Barry, but I replaced it with Bhairitu because that's the name you use here. snip Judy goes further into the ozone. Here is the first paragraph she is talking about: Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass tacks: It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces his underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the chains they revere. A related observation is that there's something fishy about Robin's insults. I think he's up to something, something beer-guzzling and perhaps
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: On 08/18/2012 05:42 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: On 08/18/2012 11:33 AM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@ wrote: So, it's all about Robin. Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see how many others do. Well gee Willy, I guess if Judy sez that it must be true. That despite the fact that the post I quoted had the word Robin in it some 47 times. Guess Judy must have read it as Tobin (or did she read it at all)? :-D Somehow I don't think az expected that Bhairitu would be one of the folks who would fall for the gag, but I could have told az he might, given his propensity to believe in nutty conspiracy theories. Still, it's hard to fathom how anybody with two brain cells to rub together could have read even just the first paragraph and thought it was about Robin. Heck, the second sentence in the first paragraph should have been enough to clue folks in that something wasn't kosher, even if their reading skills were so deficient as to prevent them from being able to decode Robin's message. The real stunner, however, is Bhairitu's claim above, that the appearance of Robin's name in the post is enough to demonstrate that it's about Robin. I mean, it boggles the mind. You just wouldn't expect that kind of stupidity from someone who had managed to make a solid career for themselves. A few highlights: Bhairitu found employment as a musician at various clubs in the Village, as well as earning acting roles in film. His made his debut on the silver screen in Abel Ferrara's China Girl, for which he also wrote the end-credit song Midnight. Bhairitu went on to collaborate with Ferrara on several film and music projects, including: Bad Lieutenant, in which Bhairitu played Jesus Christ and co-wrote the end-credits song; Body Snatchers, which featured the song I Want You Back; and The Funeral, which saw Bhairitu co-starring with Christopher Walken, Isabella Rosselini, Benicio del Toro and Vincent Gallo. Bhairitu then co-starred in the off-Broadway show A Minor Incident with legendary songwriter Carole King, who was making her stage debut in the play. The two collaborated on songs for her Capitol Records release City Streets, including the song I Can't Stop Thinking About You, which Bhairitu co-wrote and plays guitar and performs backing vocals on. It was on stage with Carole King at London's Royal Albert Hall that Bhairitu was spotted by the producers of a new West End musical Buddy: The Buddy Holly Story. Buddy opened to rave reviews on 12 October 1989, at The Victoria Palace Theater. Bhairitu's turn in the title role of Buddy Holly earned him a nomination for the Laurence Olivier Award for Outstanding Performance by an Actor in a Musical. The following year, Buddy at Broadway's Shubert Theater in New York, and Bhairitu was nominated for a Tony Award for his performance, as well as winning the Theater World Award for Best Broadway Debut. After Buddy, Bhairitu appeared in the films Fathers Sons, with Jeff Goldblum, and as Jesus Christ opposite Harvey Keitel in Abel Ferrara's Bad Lieutenant, for which he also performed and co-wrote the title song, Bad Lieutenant with Ferrara. Bhairitu also appeared as Gene Vincent opposite Donal Logue (as Eddie Cochran) in the play Be-Bop-A-Lula at Hollywood's famed Theater/Theater before returning to the London stage for the 25th anniversary revival of Hair at the Old Vic, in the role of Berger. That might have been a fun career but it wasn't mine. I don't know of anyone really named Bhairitu. It's just a Hinduzation of Barry2. Could break it down to being Bhai for brother and Ritu which is an Indian name albeit for a woman which would of course extend the joke further as brother Ritu for some cognitive dissonance. What fun! Judy goes further into the ozone. Here is the first paragraph she is talking about: Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass tacks: It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces his underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the chains they revere. A related observation is that there's something fishy about
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
On 08/18/2012 07:03 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: On 08/18/2012 05:42 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: On 08/18/2012 11:33 AM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Richard J. Williams richard@ wrote: So, it's all about Robin. Actually none of it, nothing in any of those three posts, is about Robin. You got fooled; Bhairitu got fooled; let's see how many others do. Well gee Willy, I guess if Judy sez that it must be true. That despite the fact that the post I quoted had the word Robin in it some 47 times. Guess Judy must have read it as Tobin (or did she read it at all)? :-D Somehow I don't think az expected that Bhairitu would be one of the folks who would fall for the gag, but I could have told az he might, given his propensity to believe in nutty conspiracy theories. Still, it's hard to fathom how anybody with two brain cells to rub together could have read even just the first paragraph and thought it was about Robin. Heck, the second sentence in the first paragraph should have been enough to clue folks in that something wasn't kosher, even if their reading skills were so deficient as to prevent them from being able to decode Robin's message. The real stunner, however, is Bhairitu's claim above, that the appearance of Robin's name in the post is enough to demonstrate that it's about Robin. I mean, it boggles the mind. You just wouldn't expect that kind of stupidity from someone who had managed to make a solid career for themselves. A few highlights: Bhairitu found employment as a musician at various clubs in the Village, as well as earning acting roles in film. His made his debut on the silver screen in Abel Ferrara's China Girl, for which he also wrote the end-credit song Midnight. Bhairitu went on to collaborate with Ferrara on several film and music projects, including: Bad Lieutenant, in which Bhairitu played Jesus Christ and co-wrote the end-credits song; Body Snatchers, which featured the song I Want You Back; and The Funeral, which saw Bhairitu co-starring with Christopher Walken, Isabella Rosselini, Benicio del Toro and Vincent Gallo. Bhairitu then co-starred in the off-Broadway show A Minor Incident with legendary songwriter Carole King, who was making her stage debut in the play. The two collaborated on songs for her Capitol Records release City Streets, including the song I Can't Stop Thinking About You, which Bhairitu co-wrote and plays guitar and performs backing vocals on. It was on stage with Carole King at London's Royal Albert Hall that Bhairitu was spotted by the producers of a new West End musical Buddy: The Buddy Holly Story. Buddy opened to rave reviews on 12 October 1989, at The Victoria Palace Theater. Bhairitu's turn in the title role of Buddy Holly earned him a nomination for the Laurence Olivier Award for Outstanding Performance by an Actor in a Musical. The following year, Buddy at Broadway's Shubert Theater in New York, and Bhairitu was nominated for a Tony Award for his performance, as well as winning the Theater World Award for Best Broadway Debut. After Buddy, Bhairitu appeared in the films Fathers Sons, with Jeff Goldblum, and as Jesus Christ opposite Harvey Keitel in Abel Ferrara's Bad Lieutenant, for which he also performed and co-wrote the title song, Bad Lieutenant with Ferrara. Bhairitu also appeared as Gene Vincent opposite Donal Logue (as Eddie Cochran) in the play Be-Bop-A-Lula at Hollywood's famed Theater/Theater before returning to the London stage for the 25th anniversary revival of Hair at the Old Vic, in the role of Berger. That might have been a fun career but it wasn't mine. Your name appears in it 11 times (it's much shorter than az's post). I don't know of anyone really named Bhairitu. It originally said Barry, but I replaced it with Bhairitu because that's the name you use here. snip Judy goes further into the ozone. Here is the first paragraph she is talking about: Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass tacks: It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces his underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the chains they revere. A related observation is that there's something fishy about Robin's insults. I think he's up to something, something beer-guzzling and perhaps even shameless. Now who
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@... wrote: On 08/18/2012 07:03 PM, authfriend wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu noozguru@ wrote: snip Judy goes further into the ozone. Here is the first paragraph she is talking about: Robin W Carlsen has spoken, but it's impossible to decode his incoherent message. Perhaps he's saying that all any child needs is a big dose of television every day. Then again, he might be babbling that he was chosen by God as the trustee of His wishes and desires. Let's get down to brass tacks: It is appalling to me that he has managed to ignore compromise and focus solely on his personal agenda. And let me tell you, he all but forces his underlings to make our lives a living hell. Interestingly, Robin's underlings don't much seem to mind being given such querulous orders. I guess it's hard to free chauvinistic, pompous luftmenschen from the chains they revere. A related observation is that there's something fishy about Robin's insults. I think he's up to something, something beer-guzzling and perhaps even shameless. Now who is that about? Not Robin. The only sentences that could conceivably apply to Robin are the first (if one has poor reading comprehension) and the next-to-last (a matter of opinion, and very vague to boot). Bullshit. You really must think people are stupid here, Judy. Obviously the paragraph is about Robin. Right, so obviously that you can't make a case that any of the assertions in it apply to Robin except the first and the next-to-last. Whereas I've made a case for none of them except perhaps those two as applicable. Bhairitu, you embarrass yourself. The people here aren't stupid (most of them, at any rate).
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
Many of the phrases in the original post (#317358) exist in other documents on the web as far back as 2005 as far as I can tell using a small sample of phrases from the post. Other phrases only show up on FFL. A lot of material appears to have been accommodated to create the post. It is entertaining and oddly applicable. Most of what we say and think is recycled from elsewhere, even if we give it a new form. Substitution of Robin's name gives it a sense of coherence (kind of like Robin's writing which has a sense of coherence, but tends not to make sense a lot of times). I actually first mistyped the word 'coherence', as 'conherence', which I suppose could mean a state of bringing together for the purpose conning (derived from con - persuade to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception), which often seems to be Robin's operational modality. In a response to Robin which I never finished, at one point I was trying to see how obscure I could make a simple statement. I selected as a test phrase 'I think I will take a walk.' Then I went to Google and looked up definitions of the words and put those in place of the original words, and repeated the process for several minutes. 'I think I will take a walk' became: 'In making reference to myself as a willful doer of a fact or process of doing something, typically to achieve an aim, i.e., and agent, and taking into account consideration when deciding on a possible action, your speaker here intends, desires, wishes, to make happen by reaching and grasping, to move at an arranged or constituting of a constant or definite pattern and to an acceptable extent a only at a low speed; not quick or fast, a unit of length representing the distance between two successive steps by lifting and setting down each foot in turn, never at once having both feet off the solid surface of the celestial body moving in an elliptical orbit around a star on which we live.' What can one's 'personal ontology' do with such drivel? Apparently quite a lot, at least if you are Robin. I must admit I never really get the idea of 'personal ontology', which seems to be defined in the dictionary as 'a branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being as affecting, or belonging to a particular person rather than to anyone else'. By focusing on personal aspects, Robin divides and conquers, because it is on that level that we are weakest, individuated and separate from everything, it is where we cannot be whole.
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... wrote: Many of the phrases in the original post (#317358) exist in other documents on the web as far back as 2005 as far as I can tell using a small sample of phrases from the post. Other phrases only show up on FFL. A lot of material appears to have been accommodated to create the post. It is entertaining and oddly applicable. Actually very little of it is applicable, oddly or otherwise. Most of what we say and think is recycled from elsewhere, even if we give it a new form. Substitution of Robin's name gives it a sense of coherence (kind of like Robin's writing which has a sense of coherence, but tends not to make sense a lot of times). Tends not to make sense to *you*, Xeno. And the two senses of coherence (whether you can make sense of Robin's posts or not) are not even kind of like each other. I actually first mistyped the word 'coherence', as 'conherence', which I suppose could mean a state of bringing together for the purpose conning (derived from con - persuade to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception), which often seems to be Robin's operational modality. Yet you have never been able to cite any evidence of deception in Robin's posts. That's the way Vaj makes his accusations, never citing any examples. snip I must admit I never really get the idea of 'personal ontology', which seems to be defined in the dictionary as 'a branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being as affecting, or belonging to a particular person rather than to anyone else'. By focusing on personal aspects, Robin divides and conquers, because it is on that level that we are weakest, individuated and separate from everything, it is where we cannot be whole. As you say, you have never gotten the idea or the points Robin makes about first-person ontology. They have nothing to do with divide and conquer. If Robin has any viewpoint that he would dearly love for others to recognize, it's that our first-person ontology is where we are most whole and most strong. I would suggest that if you have a sense of this viewpoint dividing and conquering, it's because you have somehow become alienated from the experience of your own first- person ontology. Which doesn't mean it's gone. Obviously it still runs you, or you wouldn't have written this post the way you did. You haven't made any kind of case against Robin here. All you've done is slung insults, and you've done it sloppily and dishonestly to boot. It's really beneath you.
Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
OMG, what a bunch of clueless, vain, petty fools - Bhairitu Xeno, dear Judy, I bow down to your patience in dealing with these petty mind, utterly threatened by Robin's brilliance. St. Share or St. Judy - oh no what a dilemma? Having said I did find dumbaz's gags very funny, laughing loud reading another one his posts, the one Share responded to, while waiting for my dinner order here at a restaurant. That these morons are so stuck in their heads is really sad - they could have just had fun, come with witty responses, retorts but all we have is their repugnant prejudices exposed in such a pathetic fashion. It always baffles me when I see people taking Xeno's mental constructs so seriously and I know I have always been curious on how he interacts with normal people in his daily life, I have asked him before and all I got was more mental constructs. Love, Ravi On Aug 18, 2012, at 8:45 PM, authfriend jst...@panix.com wrote: --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... wrote: Many of the phrases in the original post (#317358) exist in other documents on the web as far back as 2005 as far as I can tell using a small sample of phrases from the post. Other phrases only show up on FFL. A lot of material appears to have been accommodated to create the post. It is entertaining and oddly applicable. Actually very little of it is applicable, oddly or otherwise. Most of what we say and think is recycled from elsewhere, even if we give it a new form. Substitution of Robin's name gives it a sense of coherence (kind of like Robin's writing which has a sense of coherence, but tends not to make sense a lot of times). Tends not to make sense to *you*, Xeno. And the two senses of coherence (whether you can make sense of Robin's posts or not) are not even kind of like each other. I actually first mistyped the word 'coherence', as 'conherence', which I suppose could mean a state of bringing together for the purpose conning (derived from con - persuade to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception), which often seems to be Robin's operational modality. Yet you have never been able to cite any evidence of deception in Robin's posts. That's the way Vaj makes his accusations, never citing any examples. snip I must admit I never really get the idea of 'personal ontology', which seems to be defined in the dictionary as 'a branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being as affecting, or belonging to a particular person rather than to anyone else'. By focusing on personal aspects, Robin divides and conquers, because it is on that level that we are weakest, individuated and separate from everything, it is where we cannot be whole. As you say, you have never gotten the idea or the points Robin makes about first-person ontology. They have nothing to do with divide and conquer. If Robin has any viewpoint that he would dearly love for others to recognize, it's that our first-person ontology is where we are most whole and most strong. I would suggest that if you have a sense of this viewpoint dividing and conquering, it's because you have somehow become alienated from the experience of your own first- person ontology. Which doesn't mean it's gone. Obviously it still runs you, or you wouldn't have written this post the way you did. You haven't made any kind of case against Robin here. All you've done is slung insults, and you've done it sloppily and dishonestly to boot. It's really beneath you.
[FairfieldLife] Re: An open Letter To Robin Vol. 1
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Xenophaneros Anartaxius anartaxius@... wrote: Many of the phrases in the original post (#317358) exist in other documents on the web as far back as 2005 as far as I can tell using a small sample of phrases from the post. Other phrases only show up on FFL. A lot of material appears to have been accommodated to create the post. It is entertaining and oddly applicable. Most of what we say and think is recycled from elsewhere, even if we give it a new form. Substitution of Robin's name gives it a sense of coherence (kind of like Robin's writing which has a sense of coherence, but tends not to make sense a lot of times). I actually first mistyped the word 'coherence', as 'conherence', which I suppose could mean a state of bringing together for the purpose conning (derived from con - persuade to do or believe something, typically by use of a deception), which often seems to be Robin's operational modality. In a response to Robin which I never finished, at one point I was trying to see how obscure I could make a simple statement. I selected as a test phrase 'I think I will take a walk.' Then I went to Google and looked up definitions of the words and put those in place of the original words, and repeated the process for several minutes. 'I think I will take a walk' became: 'In making reference to myself as a willful doer of a fact or process of doing something, typically to achieve an aim, i.e., and agent, and taking into account consideration when deciding on a possible action, your speaker here intends, desires, wishes, to make happen by reaching and grasping, to move at an arranged or constituting of a constant or definite pattern and to an acceptable extent a only at a low speed; not quick or fast, a unit of length representing the distance between two successive steps by lifting and setting down each foot in turn, never at once having both feet off the solid surface of the celestial body moving in an elliptical orbit around a star on which we live.' What can one's 'personal ontology' do with such drivel? Apparently quite a lot, at least if you are Robin. I must admit I never really get the idea of 'personal ontology', which seems to be defined in the dictionary as 'a branch of metaphysics dealing with the nature of being as affecting, or belonging to a particular person rather than to anyone else'. By focusing on personal aspects, Robin divides and conquers, because it is on that level that we are weakest, individuated and separate from everything, it is where we cannot be whole. RESPONSE: http://tinyurl.com/d8fpk6z http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oP3c1h8v2ZQfeature=related
