--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> >
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
> > > wrote:
> >
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > > wrote:
> > > >>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
> > wrote:
>
> Of course, new.morning's questions are based on a
> misunderstanding of how th
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > I'm having alot of trouble navigating around this new Yahoo!
> > format
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >>
> I'm having alot of trouble navigating around this new Yahoo!
> format. I completely missed an important post by new.morning on tax
> and only r
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > > wrote:
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
>
> > > wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > > wrote:
>
shempmcgurk wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>shempmcgurk wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
--- shempmcgurk wrote:
>Here's t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > shempmcgurk wrote:
> > > >In light of the fact that only 19 of 100 contacted had seen
the
> > > >movie, do you think it was fair of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > >
> > > wr
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> > > wrot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >
> > shempmcgurk wrote:
> > >In light of the fact that only 19 of 100 contacted had seen the
> > >movie, do you think it was fair of the AP to lead with: "The
> > >nation's top climate scientists are giving 'An Inc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning
> wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > shempmcgurk wrote:
> > > >In light of the fact that only 19 of 100 contacted had seen
the
> > > >movie, do you think it was fair of the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > --- shempmcgurk wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here's the article in ques
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- shempmcgurk wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's the article in question, Billie:
> > >
> > > http://tinyurl.com/hmron
> > >
> > > I, for one, woul
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> >
> > shempmcgurk wrote:
> > >In light of the fact that only 19 of 100 contacted had seen the
> > >movie, do you think it was fair of the AP to lead with: "The
> > >nation's top climate scientists are giving 'An Inc
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, new.morning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> > shempmcgurk wrote:
> > >In light of the fact that only 19 of 100 contacted had seen the
> > >movie, do you think it was fair of the AP to lead with: "The
> > >nation's top climate scientists are giving 'An Inconve
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Bhairitu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> >--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >>--- shempmcgurk wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>>Here's the article in question, Billie:
> >>>
> >>>http://tinyurl.com/hmr
>
> shempmcgurk wrote:
> >In light of the fact that only 19 of 100 contacted had seen the
> >movie, do you think it was fair of the AP to lead with: "The
> >nation's top climate scientists are giving 'An Inconvenient Truth,'
> >Al Gore's documentary on global warming, five stars for accuracy." ?
shempmcgurk wrote:
>--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>--- shempmcgurk wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Here's the article in question, Billie:
>>>
>>>http://tinyurl.com/hmron
>>>
>>>I, for one, would indeed like to know what the nation's "top
>>>scient
Re: Fear-monger Gore's wacky science debunked
Re: Fear-monger Gore's wacky science debunked
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- shempmcgurk wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's the art
Re: Fear-monger Gore's wacky science debunked
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- shempmcgurk wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's the article in question, Billie:
> > >
> > > http://ti
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- shempmcgurk wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's the article in question, Billie:
> > >
> > > http://tinyurl.com/hmron
> > >
> > > I, for one, woul
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> >
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Majority Press Release
> > > U.S. Senate Committee on the Envi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- shempmcgurk wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's the article in question, Billie:
> > >
> > > http://tinyurl.com/hmron
> > >
> > > I, for one, wou
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Another one of Shemp's unimpeachable sources.
...and you, Salvatore, are simply peachy...
>
> Sal
>
>
> On Jun 28, 2006, at 8:31 AM, authfriend wrote:
>
> > Until a couple months ago, the [writer of this pre
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- shempmcgurk wrote:
> >
> > Here's the article in question, Billie:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/hmron
> >
> > I, for one, would indeed like to know what the nation's "top
> > scientists" thought of the movie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Patrick Gillam"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- shempmcgurk wrote:
> >
> > Here's the article in question, Billie:
> >
> > http://tinyurl.com/hmron
> >
> > I, for one, would indeed like to know what the nation's "top
> > scientists" thought of the movie
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend"
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Majority Press Release
> > > U.S. Senate Committee on the Environm
--- shempmcgurk wrote:
>
> Here's the article in question, Billie:
>
> http://tinyurl.com/hmron
>
> I, for one, would indeed like to know what the nation's "top
> scientists" thought of the movie...not JUST the 19 of 100 contacted
> who had seen the movie or read the book. Wouldn't you?
Thank
The fact that Marono is a shill for entrenched
interests is revealing, but that fact alone doesn't
necessarily discredit his citations. They seem
to do that on their own.
For example, Richard S. Lindzen, the Alfred P.
Sloan Professor of Atmospheric Science at MIT,
says in his Wall Street Journ
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > Majority Press Release
> > U.S. Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works
> > Contact: MARC MORANO 202-224-5762, MATT DEMPSEY 202-2
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "authfriend" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk"
> wrote:
> >
> > Majority Press Release
> > U.S. Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works
> > Contact: MARC MORANO 202-224-5762, MATT DEMPSEY 202-22
Another one of Shemp's unimpeachable sources.
Sal
On Jun 28, 2006, at 8:31 AM, authfriend wrote:
Until a couple months ago, the [writer of this press release], Marc
Marono, worked for [the very right-wing] CNSnews.com where he
distinguished himself by using disgraced NASA crony George Deutsch
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "shempmcgurk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> Majority Press Release
> U.S. Senate Committee on the Environment and Public Works
> Contact: MARC MORANO 202-224-5762, MATT DEMPSEY 202-224-9797
>From TalkingPointsMemo.com:
Until a couple months ago, the [wri
38 matches
Mail list logo