--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> "Spring time for Bevan"? :) So the TMO actually guarantees the
> failures of its own projects? Well, at least we know they're good at
> something.
>
> Sal
>
Very funny, Sal ;-)
> On Dec 25, 2005, at 11:52 AM
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>
> --- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > on 12/25/05 10:51 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > wrote:
> >
> > > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >>
> > >> I
--- Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> on 12/25/05 10:51 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>
> >> I was going to make a sarcastic crack here, but
> don't,
> >> essentially, all TMO business ventures
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Movement sells building for 112 Million
on 12/25/05 12:53 PM, Sal Sunshine at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yeah, it does. Every year, I'm always amazed by how they can both stay afloat and retain their accreditation, especially with all the disappearing majors
Yeah, it does. Every year, I'm always amazed by how they can both stay afloat and retain their accreditation, especially with all the disappearing majors, not to mention disappearing buildings. Each year I wonder if this is going to be it, and each year they pull it off.
I wonder if most of the p
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Movement sells building for 112 Million
on 12/25/05 12:26 PM, Sal Sunshine at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
"Spring time for Bevan"? :) So the TMO actually guarantees the failures of its own projects?
Doesn’t it often seem that way? It almost seems inten
"Spring time for Bevan"? :) So the TMO actually guarantees the failures of its own projects? Well, at least we know they're good at something.
Sal
On Dec 25, 2005, at 11:52 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
I heard it being presented as an investment opportunity, not a donation. And
according to a lett
on 12/25/05 11:28 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Depends on how the donation was made. Donations earmarked for a
> specific purpose can be revoked if that purpose isn't achieved, or
> even attempted.
I heard it being presented as an investment opportunity, not a donation. And
accordi
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 12/25/05 11:10 AM, jyouells2000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> on 12/25/05 1:08 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrot
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 12/25/05 10:51 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> >>
> >> I was going to make a sarcastic crack here, but don't,
> >> essential
on 12/25/05 11:10 AM, jyouells2000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> on 12/25/05 1:08 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> The trailors have been sold? TOny's house was sold?
>>
>> No, just never used for
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 12/25/05 1:08 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > The trailors have been sold? TOny's house was sold?
>
> No, just never used for their stated purposes.
>
> >Vedaland was
> > supposed to be paid for by
on 12/25/05 10:38 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>>
>> on 12/25/05 1:08 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> The trailors have been sold? TOny's house was sold?
>>
>> No, just never used for thei
on 12/25/05 10:51 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> I was going to make a sarcastic crack here, but don't,
>> essentially, all TMO business ventures go wrong? The
>> only money the TMO made was from "selling" TM,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I was going to make a sarcastic crack here, but don't,
> essentially, all TMO business ventures go wrong? The
> only money the TMO made was from "selling" TM, the
> TM-sidhi-Program and holding onto real estate out of
> iner
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "Premanand Paul Mason"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> There is a rumour (circulating in India), that the source of the
> sudden need for money is that certain business ventures have gone
> wrong. Probably this is common knowledge, known to many already?
>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 12/25/05 1:08 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > The trailors have been sold? TOny's house was sold?
>
> No, just never used for their stated purposes.
>
Tony's house is his own, is it not? He can of
I was going to make a sarcastic crack here, but don't,
essentially, all TMO business ventures go wrong? The
only money the TMO made was from "selling" TM, the
TM-sidhi-Program and holding onto real estate out of
inertia and the market just happened to turn their
way.
--- Premanand Paul Mason <[EM
There is a rumour (circulating in India), that the source of the
sudden need for money is that certain business ventures have gone
wrong. Probably this is common knowledge, known to many already?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> on 12/24/05 10:0
on 12/25/05 1:08 AM, sparaig at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The trailors have been sold? TOny's house was sold?
No, just never used for their stated purposes.
>Vedaland was
> supposed to be paid for by for-profit investors. Did THEY get ripped
> off also?
Did they see a return on their investme
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > on 12/24/05 10:06 PM, jyouells
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, "jyouells2000" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> >
> > on 12/24/05 10:06 PM, jyouells2000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > >>
> > >> An investment is an investment! You are supposed t
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
> on 12/24/05 10:06 PM, jyouells2000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >>
> >> An investment is an investment! You are supposed to make as much
> > money as
> >> you can from an investment. I can't see anybody objecting t
on 12/24/05 10:06 PM, jyouells2000 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> An investment is an investment! You are supposed to make as much
> money as
>> you can from an investment. I can't see anybody objecting to that
> unless they
>> are just jealous of somebody creating wealth. My only objection
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 12/24/05 11:24:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> If they were making any money (not even a killing) you people would
> complain that they are capitalist pigs, and if they loo
In a message dated 12/24/05 11:27:33 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
FWIW, it
turns out the $122 million figure is for therenovation by the new
owners. The sale price of thebuilding was much less, something like
$12 million,slightly above the building's offici
In a message dated 12/24/05 11:24:44 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
If they
were making any money (not even a killing) you people would complain that
they are capitalist pigs, and if they loose money you people will say they
are a bunch of incompetent hippies.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 12/24/05 11:01:20 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> It might be, but it's not exactly public information. Anyone
remember what
> they originally paid for the Blackstone?
>
>
>
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>
> In a message dated 12/24/05 11:01:20 A.M. Central Standard Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
> It might be, but it's not exactly public information. Anyone
remember what
> they originally paid for the Blackstone?
>
>
>
In a message dated 12/24/05 11:01:20 A.M. Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It might
be, but it's not exactly public information. Anyone remember whatthey
originally paid for the Blackstone?
Bingo this is the question. I hear every now and then that the
TMO has sold a
on 12/24/05 8:35 AM, dhamiltony2k5 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> $112 million.
>
> "A joint venture that includes Denver-based Sage Hospitality
> Resources LLC has
> closed
> on the acquisition of the shuttered Blackstone Hotel. A non-profit
> group headed
> by
> the Maharishi Mahesh Yogi owned
>Ron F <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> MIDWEST BRIEFS
> Deal completed for Blackstone
>
> Tribune staff, wire reports
> Published December 23, 2005
>
$112 million.
"A joint venture that includes Denver-based Sage Hospitality
Resources LLC has
closed
on the acquisition of the shuttered Blackston
32 matches
Mail list logo
