Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: local sex abuse trial
Yeah but according to Wallace, et
al, sidhas effected the hormonal balance, and perhaps overwhelmed this persons
own natural defenses. Just kidding. Child abuse has no excuse.
- Original Message -
From:
Rick
Archer
on 4/19/05 8:32 PM, easyone200 at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Not to my understanding. The molestations were occurring as many as 5 times
a week. For how long?
I guess that makes it OK then, he wasn't drunk and by your logic if it was 5
times a week
she was into it.
5 times a week, yet
Here's my take on this. The father is a very controlling man. He
develops a
possessive emotional attachment to his daughter, and is jealous when
she
starts to form friendships with boys. She resents this, and plots to
get back at
him and free herself. Being immature (naturally, at that age),
In a message dated 4/20/05 9:59:46 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
5 times
a week, yet the doctor who examined her said it was unclear that shehad
ever had sex, and her father had been diagnosed with erectiledysfunction.
Seems fishy.
Bingo, my very point , no
In a message dated 4/20/05 10:54:37 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I just
hope I don't get called forjury duty for the third trial, if there is
one.
If you do, just read this e-mail and they will scratch your
name from the jury pool!
To subscribe, send a
: Wednesday, April 20, 2005 10:43
AM
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: local sex
abuse trial
Here's my take on this. The father is a very
controlling man. Hedevelops a possessive emotional attachment to his
daughter, and is jealous whenshe starts to form friendships with boys.
She resents
snip
her father had been diagnosed with erectile
dysfunction. Seems fishy.
The term erectile dysfunction can mean the inability to achieve
erection, an inconsistent ability to do so, or the ability to achieve
only brief erections.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: local sex abuse trial
on 4/20/05 12:00 PM, Llundrub at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This shit is kind of making me sick. Does this sickness really have to spread. I mean, if sosmeone could do something about it then fine but if not can we let it go. Yuk. Nevermind
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: local sex abuse trial
So then there is really abuse
there. That's the umpteenth time I've heard of sex abuse in FF. If it was all
bullshit then we wouldn't ever hear anything.
- Original Message -
From:
Rick
Archer
To: FairfieldLife
Title: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: local sex abuse trial
on 4/20/05 5:21 PM, Llundrub at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So then there is really abuse there. That's the umpteenth time I've heard of sex abuse in FF. If it was all bullshit then we wouldn't ever hear anything.
non-meditating family
--- m2smart4u2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone following this? It ended in a mistrial
today after the jury
could not
reach a verdict. This is the second mistrial.
I feel sorry for the guy. From what
Yes, that's right. No evidence at all. The daughter says her father
had sex with
her up to five times a week. Her mother never suspected that anything
was
going on.
Now the prosecutors are considering whether to initiate a third
trial. This
strikes me as stupid. So far they have failed to
How old is the daughter? Is the father an alcoholic?
--- feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Yes, that's right. No evidence at all. The daughter
says her father
had sex with
her up to five times a week. Her mother never
suspected that anything
was
going on.
Now the prosecutors are
I think the daughter was about 16 when this supposedly took place. I don't
think he's an alcholic. He still has his insurance business in town.
He apparently is a very controlling individual, especially where his wife and
daughter are concerned, but that's not what he's on trial for.
feste37 wrote:
My point is really that if the prosecutors have
failed to convince two juries that this man is
guilty, that amounts to a not guilty verdict,
since there is obviously a reasonable doubt.
The county attorneys in charge of such prosecutions aren't necessarily
practiced
In a message dated 4/19/05 8:12:24 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes,
that's right. No evidence at all. The daughter says her father
had sex with her up to five times a week. Her mother never
suspected that anything was going on.
Ok the daughter says
This was supposed to be the
recharging mantras thread, my bad.
- Original Message -
From:
Llundrub
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Tuesday, April 19, 2005 9:03
AM
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: local
sex abuse trial
I think that relating
--- feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the daughter was about 16 when this
supposedly took place. I don't
think he's an alcholic. He still has his insurance
business in town.
He apparently is a very controlling individual,
especially where his wife and
daughter are
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/19/05 8:12:24 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yes, that's right. No evidence at all. The daughter
says her father
had sex with
her up to five times a week. Her mother
on 4/19/05 7:35 AM, Peter Sutphen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Is this a he said, she said case? Meaning the only
evidence against the guy is the testimony of the
accuser?
Who happens to be his daughter. It's messy.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
In a message dated 4/19/05 10:41:41 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Larry
Smith Jr. took the witness stand Wednesday and today to defend himself
against charges of sexual abuse and incest, denying that he ever molested
his daughter.
Based on what has been
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/19/05 10:41:41 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Larry Smith Jr. took the witness stand Wednesday and today to
defend himself against charges of sexual abuse and incest, denying
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/19/05 10:41:41 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Larry Smith Jr. took the witness stand Wednesday and today to
defend himself against charges of sexual abuse and incest,
denying
In a message dated 4/19/05 8:02:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Based on what has been said so far I'm inclined to believe Larry
Smith jr. What is the motive for the daughter to slander her
father though?Duh?... Let me thinkmaybe he
molested her,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/19/05 8:02:17 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Based on what has been said so far I'm inclined to believe Larry
Smith jr.
What is the motive for the daughter to slander her
--- easyone200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/19/05 8:02:17 P.M. Central
Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Based on what has been said so far I'm inclined
to believe Larry
Smith jr.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boy, easyone, you're begining to show the logic of
some other more notorious list members!
Shhh, they don't want any one to know yet. But he and off-world have
been meeting secretly after list hours.
To
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boy, easyone, you're begining to show the logic of
some other more notorious list members!
Shhh, they don't want any one to know
m2smart4u2000 wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Peter Sutphen
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Boy, easyone, you're begining to show the logic of
some other more notorious list members!
Shhh, they
In a message dated 4/19/05 8:35:38 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess
that makes it OK then, he wasn't drunk and by your logic if it was 5 times a
week she was into it.
Lets jump to conclusions Easyone. I guess that's where your
logic takes you. Why did
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/19/05 8:35:38 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I guess that makes it OK then, he wasn't drunk and by your logic
if it was 5
times a week
she was into it.
Lets jump
In a message dated 4/19/05 11:16:48 P.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
My
understanding was that he wrecked her car AFTER she reported the abuse to
police. If you read the FF ledger he said he was so upset he got really
drunk and when he woke up the next day her
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, feste37 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyone following this? It ended in a mistrial today after the jury
could not
reach a verdict. This is the second mistrial.
I feel sorry for the guy. From what I read in the Ledger, the case
against him is
simply
33 matches
Mail list logo
