Re: "I do not initiate attack." Share has re-written reality in order to
justify her post to you yesterday which wasn't even close to an "in kind"
response. Then, she chooses to defend her reality re-write like it represents
"truth" so she doesn't have to accept responsibility for her own beha
Judy, imo MGC did Avoidance Dance recently WRT indiff's language. Where was
their outrage then?! It's still about RWC for them imo and that's why they
exempt their buddies from their protestations, moral posturings, etc. and focus
on me. Going by what others here have said, you are the queen of
Has Barry been forging my email again?? I'll skin him alive. I guess he's
trying to scrounge a bit of income now that he's left his job.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Are you *sure* there is no such thing as the MGC? Because if that's the case,
I just wired my thousand dollar
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-Y82ifoTjs
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=o-Y82ifoTjs
Share spewed: > > imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me.
Expecially you, Judy, the number
> > grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true.
Ann wrote:
> Look out J
Ann, I love you. You and Judy are in a tie for the best post of year - song
wise.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Are you saying that Ann's
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBd93pJRJ54
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are
you saying her parody was vicious? I understand that you truly believe that
Ann
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with
Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo
precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters.
Think again. "Poisoned"? Being
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy,
the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true.
Look out Judy, Share has an insider track on what people are saying on the
internet a
Here's a song for you and Barry, Share. Why you gotta be so mean?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgrJT8tVdZw
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rgrJT8tVdZw
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are
you say
You know who turned Ann's funny parody post into something poisonous and
vicious, Share?
Hint: It wasn't Ann. (Or me or Emily, either.)
Share blubbered:
> Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with
> Richard, a tactic
> used often by MGC, not only when I
Are you saying that Ann's picture of herself at the beach was vicious? Or are
you saying her parody was vicious? I understand that you truly believe that
Ann was after you, personally, on a public forum with public posting and you
thought you were responding "in-kind." Share, you are doing the
For the record, well before you got here, Emily, Barry attacked my appearance a
number of times. So did Edg once after I'd said something that annoyed him, but
he sort of took it back later. Barry never has, of course.
Fortunately, like Ann, I'm not insecure about my appearance, so Barry's
a
Emily, imo, Ann viciously poisoned a fun exchange that I was having with
Richard, a tactic used often by MGC, not only when I ignore you all, but imo
precisely because I'm enjoying exchanges with other posters. It's one of the
most vicious things that you all do and I will continue to respond in
And look, you are still at it Share...reaching for anything to distract
yourself from the fact that you wrote a mean and malicious post. I can't even
think of anyone else who has stooped so low as to attack someone's personal
visage, except you. Face it Share. Your post was trying to hit below
Share bleated:
> imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me.
Oh, Share, don't be absurd. Still feeling guilty about that, are you?
Good grief. As if there weren't enough else to criticize you for, both before
and after your RWC debacle. Anyway, your good buddy Barry claims
HAHAHAHAHA! Yes, pretend not to understand and ask Richard. That'll really help.
Do you think you can make yourself look just a little bit more ridiculous,
Share?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I did not write those words to Emily so I don't know why she put them in
quotes.
Ah, one of the few times I forget to put imo and Judy lands on it like a tick
on a hound dog in Alabamie in July!
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Says Share, doing her Avoidance Dance. Absolute refusal to deal with the
reality of the viciousness of her post about Ann.
As t
imo, RWC is the #1 big reason you all keep attacking me. Expecially you, Judy,
the number 1 grudge holder maybe on the internet if what others say is true.
Since that seems to be what's needed to be Queen Bee, I'm happy to let you keep
that job. As for Emily, why exclude Obbajee and Susan? Excep
Says Share, doing her Avoidance Dance. Absolute refusal to deal with the
reality of the viciousness of her post about Ann.
As to your attempt to change the subject, I do some of what you describe in
some cases when it appears to apply. Now let's see if you can show the kind of
integrity Emil
I did not write those words to Emily so I don't know why she put them in
quotes. Richard, do you know what Judy is getting at?
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:48 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
As I said: Share isn't really this stupid. She just pretends to be this stupid.
---In
As I said: Share isn't really this stupid. She just pretends to be this stupid.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
> Where I come from, Emily's quotation marks means that she's quoting me.
> Except I did not
> write those words to her, directly nor via the forum.
On Wedn
Unlike you, Emily has integrity. So when you claimed that you liked Obbajeeba
and Susan, she took you at your word and amended what she said about you to
exclude them. And after she'd done that to accommodate your claim, you accused
her of saying Obbajeeba and Susan weren't "strong and beautiful
Judy if you are against someone, you assert that their faults are the *real"
person. And you actually revel in seeing those faults. If someone is positive,
then you say they are phoney. Worse of all, you over and over present your
opinions as facts.
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:20 PM,
Sorry, Share, but no objective person is going to see your post to Ann as
anything other than exceptionally nasty, especially given that Ann's post was
just a funny parody.
No, you haven't "claimed" sainthood, but the way you behave is clearly
designed to make you appear to be saintly. That
Where I come from, Emily's quotation marks means that she's quoting me. Except
I did not write those words to her, directly nor via the forum.
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 3:08 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
Just for the record, Share isn't this stupid. She pretends to be this st
Just for the record, Share isn't this stupid. She pretends to be this stupid.
Share babbled:
> Just for the record, I don't know why Emily put those words in quotes
> because I did not
> write these words to her.
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:07 PM, "emilymaenot@..."
wrote:
Just for the record, I don't know why Emily put those words in quotes because I
did not write these words to her.
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 2:07 PM, "emilymae...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
"Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely,
Share." Thank you
"Emily, step away from the computer. Take that little dog on a walk. Sincerely,
Share." Thank you Share, I'll do that. The sun is shining today and I am in a
good mood. Sincerely, Emily.
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
*YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE* *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE*
*YOU WROTE THE POST SHARE* *IT WAS MEAN AND ANGRY SHARE* *FEEL THE FEELINGS
SHARE*
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both
want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason.
On Wednesd
I believe Obbajee posted recently and Susan about a month ago. But you both
want to exclude them from Emily's assessment for an obvious reason.
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:32 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know wh
No, Share, look for the parenthetical in what Emily wrote. (You know what a
parenthetical is, right?)
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are
ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me.
No, Judy, what's interesting and predictable is that Emily and now you, are
ignoring the women who disprove what Emily's saying about me.
On Wednesday, November 20, 2013 1:18 PM, "authfri...@yahoo.com"
wrote:
You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that
interesti
You appear to have overlooked the parenthetical, Share. Isn't that
interesting!?
---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote:
Emily, are you saying that Obbajee and Susan aren't strong and beautiful?! I'm
not threatened by either of them. How do you account for that?
On Wednesday,
33 matches
Mail list logo
