[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-14 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Raised and groomed in the school of megalomania, how could the North Korean kid know differently. Bush was right, we got an axis of un-spiritual and ignorant evil there. -Buck in the Dome “States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the

[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-14 Thread dhamiltony2k5
“States like these, and their terrorist allies, constitute an axis of evil, arming to threaten the peace of the world. By seeking weapons of mass destruction, these regimes pose a grave and growing danger. They could provide these arms to terrorists, giving them the means to match their hatred.

[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-14 Thread dhamiltony2k5
I am feeling Bush II was quite right in his way, we got the vibration of an axis of evil going there. Very un-spiritual in excitation. Not much love at all. This is coming a time where people now who know better should come back to meditation around this. -Buck in the Dome “States like

[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-14 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Updating love, the descent of Christmas love can't come fast enough to that area. Love needs to be updated fast in that whole East China Sea region right now. People everywhere should come to meditation now. Tonite. Tomorrow morning. That whole region needs a major download of love as a vector

[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-13 Thread dhamiltony2k5
North Korea announced on Thursday that it had executed Chang Song-thaek, the uncle of leader Kim Jong-un, for acts of treachery. The move has raised concerns of instability in the secretive and repressive nuclear-armed country. A Platform for World Peace-making: “One of the now disputed

[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-12 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: With reference to DEFENCE, Heaven on Earth will be characterized by 'victory before war' -lack of the need to prepare for defense, because everything and everyone will be on the path of evolution, and as a result, coherence in every country will be

[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-12 Thread dhamiltony2k5
A Platform for World Peace-making: “One of the now disputed areas is a submerged rock on which a South Korean maritime research base is perched” http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-25288268 http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-25288268 Come to a group Mediation Meditation for

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-09 Thread Bhairitu
Perhaps then we should call it communityism. ;-) On 12/08/2013 08:42 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote: I followed the link. Re It is that everybody feels that if the society succeeds, I succeed, I don’t get left behind.: I second that. But in itself that wouldn't be communism - small-c. I'm

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread dhamiltony2k5
But why the nuke subs and naval cruisers anyway? Is there a reason they started all this taunt around the anniversary day of infamy? Pearl Harbor? authfriend@... wrote: You do know the Chinese aren't going to bomb us, right? The chinese central committee secured a really

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread dhamiltony2k5
What can any of us individually do to avert this danger? Meditate and act with discipline together. That is what any of us can do to avert this danger; Bolster our collective forces in defense, including more meditation. -Buck But why the nuke subs and naval cruisers anyway? Is

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread dhamiltony2k5
We don''t know the intention of these communists. Get some Chinese generals, some high rank party tru-believer communists, throw in a couple of red narcissists and a megalomaniac all together in the war room of the old Palace playing with the controls of nuke subs and cruisers, and we got

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread dhamiltony2k5
This is ominous as hell. I apologize for the strong language here but we should sit up in meditation around this. This is a call to mediation in meditation. This is a call to surround the situation with deep transcending meditation. This is now our wake-up call to meditation to neutralize and

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread authfriend
Er, Buck, Pearl Harbor was attacked by the Japanese, not the Chinese. Look, we know you like to hype threats to scare folks into the Domes, but this one is so absurd it seriously damages any credibility you had. Buck wrote: But why the nuke subs and naval cruisers anyway? Is there a

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread authfriend
No. No, it's not. Sorry. We have plenty of things to worry about, but China taking out the West Coast with nuclear bombs isn't one of them. Buck wrote: This is ominous as hell. snip nonsense

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread Richard J. Williams
China would probably not instigate a nuclear attack on the U.S. - that would be suicidal on their part. The U.S. could hit them real hard from all sides and close off all their resources by air and sea in a matter of hours. Without fuel imports they would probably all starve in a matter of

[FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread emptybill
And no possible chance of over-arching conflict with the North Koreans. Everyone knows they are really just bluffing so they can get more Gucci belts for their consorts.

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread Share Long
emptybill, are you saying that it's really all about women?! On Sunday, December 8, 2013 12:04 PM, emptyb...@yahoo.com emptyb...@yahoo.com wrote:   And no possible chance of over-arching conflict with the North Koreans. Everyone knows they are really just bluffing so they can get more

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread Bhairitu
I have a feeling the young North Korean dictator may be trying to figure out how to transition the country from a totalitarian state to a democracy without spinning out of control. Schooled abroad he might like to see his country join the world community rather than be the spoiled brat in the

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread Bhairitu
Buck, off the top of your head (without looking at the Internet) please define communism. On 12/08/2013 12:57 PM, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote: *We don''t know the intention of these communists. Get some Chinese generals, some high rank party tru-believer communists, throw in a couple of

[FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread s3raphita
Re Off the top of your head (without looking at the Internet) please define communism: You keep posting this challenge. We all know what Communist states were like - and we all know we sure as hell wouldn't want to live there. If you mean cuddly communism with a small c it boils down to

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread Bhairitu
I post the challenge because most people throw the word around applying it to things like totalitarian and authoritarian states. Those can also be right wing. They also confuse communism and socialism. Most of the arguments I hear are emotional and not intellectual. IOW, just knew jerk

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Communalism? Son, you got a mental picture of the Standing Committee of the Chinese Communist Politburo. They are the ones who bought out Smithfield hogs, lock, stock and all for cash. You know it (Red chinese commune-ism in this case) when you see it. Communism. Communists. That picture is

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread Bhairitu
The Chinese Communist Politburo bought Smithfield? Maybe you better let NBC News know because they say it was bought by Shuanghui, a Chinese company based in Hong Kong and not by the Chinese government. http://www.nbcnews.com/business/chinese-get-ok-buy-american-pork-producer-4B11243408 On

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Follow the money. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote: The Chinese Communist Politburo bought Smithfield? Maybe you better let NBC News know because they say it was bought by Shuanghui, a Chinese company based in Hong Kong and not by the Chinese government.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread authfriend
Every country that has nukes has 'em pointed at every other country that has nukes. You sound as though it would be news to you to learn that we have nukes pointed at China. I'm beginning to think you're having us on. Buck wrote: Communalism? Son, you got a mental picture of the Standing

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Actually there is a remarkable similarity with the TM movement in these business things. Like the Chinese there is a small group at the top and then a flow-chart that gets really wide right away and then real deep under that with individuals and a flow of committees. Yes, you won't be able to

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread Bhairitu
David Simon (The Wire, Treme) with a rap on capitalism: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/12/08/david-simon-there-are-now-two-americas-my-country-is-a-horror-show/ On 12/08/2013 03:20 PM, s3raph...@yahoo.com wrote: Re Off the top of your head (without looking at the Internet) please define

[FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread s3raphita
“Mediation in Meditation” It worked before with the Soviets to drop the Iron Curtain and bring down the Wall. What worked was that the USSR became bankrupt trying to compete with US military muscle. Their ballistic submarines were the biggest drain on the public purse. If you want

Re: [FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-08 Thread s3raphita
I followed the link. Re It is that everybody feels that if the society succeeds, I succeed, I don’t get left behind.: I second that. But in itself that wouldn't be communism - small-c. I'm in favour of small-c communism in small communities like artists' colonies where people have come

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-07 Thread dhamiltony2k5
In Fairfield, Iowa we are proly okay or safe enough from what will be a West coast radiation fall-out plume. It would be in the red Chinese interests to not radiate their farm land in Iowa. ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, noozguru@... wrote: I would think 2.3 billion would be a bit

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-07 Thread Share Long
Buck, not to mention all their exchange students, etc. at MUM and in the Domes! On Saturday, December 7, 2013 10:08 AM, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote:   In Fairfield, Iowa we are proly okay or safe enough from what will be a West coast radiation fall-out plume.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-07 Thread dhamiltony2k5
The communist chinese over-seers are not going to nuke their own real estate holdings in Iowa hog production. That would not make sense considering some of the best soil in the whole world is here in Iowa to feed all their chinese billions. Buck, not to mention all their exchange

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-07 Thread dhamiltony2k5
The chinese got a good foot hold already going in Iowa. As meditators we are proly safe in Fairfield from the destruction of LA and Seattle; the chinese reds would proly only use low yield bombs on the West coast to preserve their holdings in Iowa. Red china bought and owns Smithfield Hogs.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-07 Thread emilymaenot
I see a massive migration to Fairfield, IA happening soon. Your small and cozy community is about to turn into a mecca of the midwest. If you play your cards right, you might finally get the number of meditators needed together in one place to achieve peace on earth.

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-07 Thread authfriend
You do know the Chinese aren't going to bomb us, right? Buck wrote: The chinese got a good foot hold already going in Iowa. As meditators we are proly safe in Fairfield from the destruction of LA and Seattle; the chinese reds would proly only use low yield bombs on the West coast to preserve

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-07 Thread Bhairitu
Uh Buck, folks from China are buying homes on the west coast. They want to raise their kids here so they can go to our colleges. I don't think they want to be pummeled by nukes from their native land. On 12/07/2013 06:56 PM, dhamiltony...@yahoo.com wrote: *The chinese got a good foot hold

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-07 Thread dhamiltony2k5
The chinese central committee secured a really great big slab of Iowa hog with this purchase for themselves . Big money industrial agriculturalists proly just would say, the more Iowa hogs owned by China the safer we all are in Iowa. Is that what free trade is all about? Making your enemy your

[FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-06 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Well, good morning to you too. The chinese wont have much to shoot at after the sea-level changes soon coming from anthropocentric global climate change. If we can just put off this attack long enough they wont have Seattle or LA to shoot at. -Buck

[FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-06 Thread dhamiltony2k5
In the meanwhile, let's hold the chinese reds off by staying current on our payments of consumer debt to them. Prudently let us tighten the belt, spend a lot more time meditating and a lot less time and credit on frivolous consumer goods. -Buck Buck wrote: Well, good morning to you

[FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-06 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Fall-out from Red Chinese sneak attack on USA: ---In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Buck wrote: Well, good morning to you too. The chinese wont have much to shoot at after the sea-level changes soon coming from anthropocentric global climate change. If we can just put off this attack

[FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-06 Thread TurquoiseB
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, wrote: In the meanwhile, let's hold the chinese reds off by staying current on our payments of consumer debt to them. Prudently let us tighten the belt, spend a lot more time meditating and a lot less time and credit on frivolous consumer goods. I wouldn't

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-06 Thread Michael Jackson
of your home and office frivolous consumer goods = TM adjuncts of every shape and description On Fri, 12/6/13, TurquoiseB turquoi...@yahoo.com wrote: Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-06 Thread Bhairitu
I think that $230 billion a year is globally not the US. Otherwise there would new age shops on every corner. Many in this area have closed up since the 1990s. And also I think they are folding not necessarily new age in to their count such as environmental items. On 12/06/2013 04:22 AM,

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-06 Thread dhamiltony2k5
Yes, Bhairitu is entirely right, it clearly is not just some new-agers consuming some spiritual trinkets. It is a much larger problem. However, we do know from the example of the Meissner Effect [ME] that just a few of us can change things; even the course of history. Yep, frivolous

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-06 Thread dhamiltony2k5
To repulse the chinese we just need way more discipline in the way we live our lives. We must repent the materialism of our ostentatious ways and come back to practice and live a simple meditation in life. Have you heard about the absolute theory of defense? Yes, Bhairitu is

Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-06 Thread Bhairitu
I would think 2.3 billion would be a bit of a large number for the US and then that would probably take rolling in things like yoga classes offered at fitness centers. And if global, India would really skew the numbers. :-D It's like their looking for a next big thing. On 12/06/2013 10:51

[FairfieldLife] RE: Inside China: Nuclear submarines capable of widespread attack on U.S.

2013-12-05 Thread s3raphita
A nation that has atom bombs could always simply use a bog-standard conventional submarine which could surface one dark night off the eastern or western seaboard of the USA, deposit a device on the coast and set it to explode an hour later. That would cause devastating damage - physical and