There you go again, telling people how to behave, what they should and should
not reply to. Old habits I guess.
I am one who used to be bothered immensely by individuals over posting.
In particular, Ron, somebody, sidha1008, (I believe)
Then something clicked, and people over posting
Steve, I so appreciate what you've written this morning but my favorite was: be
the change you want to see in the world.
But now in essence, turq is calling Richard a terrorist?! That's the real WTF
in all this. IMO, of course.
Isn't it actually pretty easy? I come home from a meeting. I've
On 9/3/2014 9:24 AM, Share Long sharelon...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Steve, I so appreciate what you've written this morning but my
favorite was: be the change you want to see in the world.
But now in essence, turq is calling Richard a terrorist?! That's the
real WTF in all this. IMO,
On 9/3/2014 8:46 AM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
There you go again, telling people how to behave, what they should and
should not reply to. Old habits I guess.
I am one who used to be bothered immensely by individuals over posting.
In particular, Ron, somebody,
Hey, for the record, I have no problem being referred to as Willytex Clone.
Doesn't bother me in the least.
It's just that I would have cringed if Barry had referred to me that way, him
being such a proponent of original content, and all that.
But, Michael has calmed down a bit.
I
So if 40 other people suddenly showed up and started using FFL as their
own personal Twitter like WillyTex does you wouldn't mind? WillyTex is
probably to schizoid to calm down any. After all we've been thinking
for years that he has been tweeting from Austin State Hospital. ;-)
On
Well, that's kinda funny, that last part.
Richard will tell you, it's a non-sequitur, he's from San Antonio.
But we don't have it , people tweeting like that.
Danny boy gave it a good run.
I admit, it's a little annoying, but come up with a solution, short of banning
people.
I
Willy just ought to wise up or I'll dig into my tantrik bag for a
solution. ;-)
You're forgetting Willy claimed to be from Austin for years.
On 09/03/2014 07:26 PM, steve.sun...@yahoo.com [FairfieldLife] wrote:
Well, that's kinda funny, that last part.
Richard will tell you, it's a
I never claimed to have graduated from MUM
or to have even attended there. Or maybe
you mean not graduating from MUM makes one
a fraud, in which case I have quite a lot
of company.
Sal wrote:
If you graduated from MIU, are you also a
fraud? Or a fraudette?
Well, I'd say that
PROTECTED]
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Overposting Ban
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Friday, October 10, 2008, 7:55 AM
I never claimed to have graduated from MUM
or to have even attended there. Or maybe
you mean not graduating from MUM makes one
a fraud, in which case I have
On Oct 10, 2008, at 8:53 PM, gullible fool wrote:
There, you see, Sal? I told you only Richard could answer these
kinds of advanced ponderings.
He pondered himself right out of the group for a week...
Sal
According to my sources, you informants will
never be allowed ever again to set foot
inside a Marshy Golden Dome of Pure Knowledge.
gullible fool wrote:
I am on here anonymously.
So, you've got something to hide - you're not being
honest.
You and the other apostates didn't keep the
completely until there is no `you,' only
love.
- Amma
--- On Thu, 10/9/08, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Overposting Ban
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 7:54 AM
According
gullible wrote:
So, you got kicked out of MUM - I thought so.
You thought wrong. The only time I was a
student at MUM was when the administration
got as many CCP and TSR participants as possible
to sign up as pretend students in order to
commit a fraud on the government/board of
there is no `you,' only
love.
- Amma
--- On Thu, 10/9/08, Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Richard J. Williams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Overposting Ban
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 4:29 PM
gullible wrote:
So, you got
On Oct 9, 2008, at 6:03 PM, gullible fool wrote:
So, you're a fraud who never graduated from MUM.
I never claimed to have graduated from MUM or to have even attended
there. Or maybe you mean not graduating from MUM makes one a fraud,
in which case I have quite a lot of company.
If you
:
From: Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: Overposting Ban
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Thursday, October 9, 2008, 9:02 PM
On Oct 9, 2008, at 6:03 PM, gullible fool wrote:
So, you're a fraud who never graduated from MUM.
I never claimed to have graduated
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Oct 8, 2008, at 1:09 PM, Rick Archer wrote:
From now on, when someone gets banned for overposting, the ban will
cover not just one calendar week from the day they overposted, but
the remainder of that
Tom wrote:
Does this count as another post of Shemp?
From what I've read, you get banned from
meditating in the Dome, forever, if you post
here a single time. Typical TMO tactics. Why
should a TM forum be any different? After
all, most of the informers here are the TMO.
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Richard J. Williams
Sent: Wednesday, October 08, 2008 3:03 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Overposting Ban
Tom wrote:
Does this count as another post of Shemp?
From what I've read
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
mailto:FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com , Richard J. Williams
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom wrote:
Does this count as another post of Shemp?
From what I've read, you get banned from
meditating in the Dome, forever, if you post
here a single time. .
From what I've read, you get banned from
meditating in the Dome, forever, if you post
here a single time.
Off wrote:
Incorrect. They even let warmongers like you
back in.
Maybe so, but from what I've heard, you are
banned from even setting for on the MUM campus.
What's up with that?
From what I've read, you get banned from
meditating in the Dome, forever, if you
post here a single time.
Rick Archer wrote:
Gee, does that mean I'll never get back in?
According to my sources, you informants will
never be allowed ever again to set foot
inside a Marshy Golden Dome of
: [FairfieldLife] Re: Overposting Ban
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Date: Wednesday, October 8, 2008, 7:56 PM
From what I've read, you get banned from
meditating in the Dome, forever, if you
post here a single time.
Rick Archer wrote:
Gee, does that mean I'll never get back in?
According to my
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, in Judy's response to my Scare Quotes redux post,
I think we have a clear picture of how the rules Judy
tries to force others to follow with regard to language
don't apply to her.
Nope, more fantasy. I don't try
TurquoiseB wrote:
Ok, in Judy's response to my Scare Quotes redux post,
I think we have a clear picture of how the rules Judy
tries to force others to follow with regard to language
don't apply to her. I guess it's because she is special.
[Scare quotes here...I don't mean to imply that
Thanks 4 limiting some. Posts are indeed more focused less rude more
limited with fewer in #s easier to delete the few we do NOT enjoy who always
seem more than 1/2 attack others views with non sweetly verbiage with few
letters.
** See what's free at
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing 38 posts for Judy and 37 for Shemp, and we've got
one day to go. Yahoo has been sending some duplicate emails,
so if you're certain of a more accurate count, you may be
within the limit, but you must be
On May 25, 2007, at 6:59 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
Suppose that a poster is...uh...a tad uncontrolled
in their posting habits, and feels somewhat of an...
uh...compulsion to answer or refute any post that
contains ideas counter to their own.
Sounds like digital stalking to me.
Rick,
Thank you for limiting the number of FFL posts to 5 per day per FFL
contributor. I
have observed FFL since its 2001 beginning, and I enjoy visiting FFL more now
than before
the limits because the content of posts is now more focused, and I think the
tone of the
exchanges
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of mainstream20016
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 3:17 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Overposting?- Thank you, Rick, for setting
limits -
Rick,
Thank you for limiting the number of FFL posts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of mainstream20016
Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 3:17 PM
To: FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [FairfieldLife] Re: Overposting?- Thank you
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Rick Archer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm seeing 38 posts for Judy and 37 for Shemp,
Yeah, but I get extra. I'm invoking affirmative action for myself.
and we've got one day to go.
Yahoo has been sending some duplicate emails, so if you're
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On May 3, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Kenny H wrote:
Since we all already know who has no self control
and who would thus (blessedly) take themselves out
of the action within the first 24 to 36 hours of
the week,
On May 4, 2007, at 4:48 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:
On May 3, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Kenny H wrote:
Since we all already know who has no self control
and who would thus (blessedly) take themselves out
of the action within the first 24 to 36 hours of
the week, this one now has my vote, too.
There was
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine salsunshine@
wrote:
On May 3, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Kenny H wrote:
Since we all already know who has no self control
and who would thus (blessedly) take
Here's another idea:
Keep the 5 posts a day maximum. But for those that want to post MORE
than the 5, we can have buy indulgences. You know, like the Catholic
Church in days of yore. Or in the TMO like when someone buys into
becoming a Raja.
Or maybe we can purchase extra posts via carbon
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
On May 3, 2007, at 7:20 AM, Vaj wrote:
Why mess with what already works so nicely?
On May 3, 2007, at 1:17 AM, Rick Archer wrote:
Judy posted 10 times today, so she joins Shemp in moderation
land. No
Sally wrote:
My guess is, Judy and her latest sidekick, Jim, will keep trying
to start arguments with whomoever's convenient...
So, Sally, your contribution to the news forum today is to pick a
fight with Jim and Judy. Go figure.
Rick Archer wrote:
Judy posted 10 times today, so she joins
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 5/3/07 12:17:43 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm seriously thinking of trying the 35 posts-per-week system.
You can shoot your wad in one day and we won't hear from you for
a
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 5/3/07 12:17:43 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
rick@ writes:
I'm seriously thinking of trying the 35 posts-per-week system.
You
On May 3, 2007, at 2:37 PM, Kenny H wrote:
Since we all already know who has no self control
and who would thus (blessedly) take themselves out
of the action within the first 24 to 36 hours of
the week, this one now has my vote, too.
There was no need for you to make any reference to anyone
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, TurquoiseB [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, MDixon6569@ wrote:
In a message dated 5/3/07 12:17:43 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
rick@ writes:
I'm seriously thinking of trying the 35 posts-per-week system.
You
43 matches
Mail list logo
