On Jun 18, 2005, at 5:16 PM, anonymousff wrote:
This is what I was hoping that you could elaborate on. Not just an
idle request. I think you would be doing a service for the readers of
FFL to bring out the significant differences/contradictions to what
many of us were taught.
Briefly,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 18, 2005, at 5:16 PM, anonymousff wrote:
This is what I was hoping that you could elaborate on. Not just an
idle request. I think you would be doing a service for the
readers of
FFL to bring out the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is his word? One sentence from a conversation 35 years ago
with a
shankaracharay not recognized by the traditon. And his main work
appears to be a novelist, on topics not related to Indian studies
Cough:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 18, 2005, at 12:51 AM, akasha_108 wrote:
As I said I reached this conclusion quite sadly. Its not a
conclusion
I thought possible or sought.
This was my experience as well. It was a similar process one goes
On Jun 18, 2005, at 12:50 PM, Premanand Paul Mason wrote:
'the standard treatise still used by the swamis of this order' is?
The Treatise on Cosmic Consciousness (jivanmuktiviveka) by
Shankaracharya Vidyaranya.
To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or go to:
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it totally contradicted what Mahesh taught
Premanand Paul Mason wrote:
'the standard treatise still used by the swamis of this order' is?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The Treatise on Cosmic Consciousness
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, markmeredith2002
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What is his word? One sentence from a conversation 35 years ago
with a
shankaracharay not recognized by the traditon. And his main
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 18, 2005, at 12:50 PM, Premanand Paul Mason wrote:
'the standard treatise still used by the swamis of this order' is?
The Treatise on Cosmic Consciousness (jivanmuktiviveka) by
Shankaracharya Vidyaranya.
Hmmm.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jun 18, 2005, at 12:50 PM, Premanand Paul Mason wrote:
'the standard treatise still used by the swamis of this order' is?
The Treatise on Cosmic Consciousness (jivanmuktiviveka) by
Shankaracharya Vidyaranya.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, anonymousff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- Vaj [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
it totally contradicted what Mahesh taught
Premanand Paul Mason wrote:
'the standard treatise still used by the swamis of this order' is?
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com,
I've been aware of this article for many years, but thanks for the
reference. And BTW, the courts ruled that Swami Vasudevananda
couldn't use the title for fund-raising, not that he couldn't use the
title at all.
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
BTW, Swami Vishnudevananda was another person on Gurudev's will, so
Swami Brahmananda was giving at least some weight to the will when he
selected his sucessor. Swami Swaroopananda once asked why Swami
Shatananda wasn't following the will, but in fact, it appears he was.
--- In
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been aware of this article for many years, but thanks for the
reference. And BTW, the courts ruled that Swami Vasudevananda
couldn't use the title for fund-raising, not that he couldn't use
the title at all.
Thats
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been aware of this article for many years, but thanks for the
reference. And BTW, the courts ruled that Swami Vasudevananda
couldn't use
And Dana is acknowleged in the footnotes:
16) My thanks go to Dana Sawyer of Maine College of Art, who kindly
shared with me the results of his field studies and interviews. See
also his article, Monastic Structure of Banarsi Dandi Sadhus in
Living Banaras: Hindu Religion in Cultural Context,
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been aware of this article for many years, but thanks for the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
I've been aware of this article for many years, but thanks for
the
reference. And BTW, the courts ruled that Swami Vasudevananda
couldn't use
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Most Swamis and such don't support MMY.
From the numerous swamis -- over many interviews cpnducted by Dana
personally--- as I understand
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Most Swamis and such don't support MMY.
From the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Most Swamis and such don't support MMY.
From the
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Akasha
As I said I reached this conclusion quite sadly. Its not a
conclusion
I thought possible or sought.
sparaig
We chose those facts
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, sparaig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
--- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, akasha_108 [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Akasha
As I said I reached this conclusion quite sadly. Its not a
24 matches
Mail list logo
