Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-19 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 9/18/06 11:00:13 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  Here's what you said:"Unfortunately, there are many who say they 
  aren't evolved enough to handle democracy and need a Saddam or that we 
  have no business helping these people get rid of their dictators that 
  steel their wealth that pours into their nations by the hundreds of 
  billions of dollars. The same also say it's too costly or lets just do 
  what we can to get along so we can do business and keep the oil flowing as 
  cheaply as we can. No, not everybody wants to keep the third world 
  nations impoverished and under the thumbs of dictators, just 
  some."Do you really not find your incredibly feeble copoutabove 
  embarrassing?You were *obviously* referring to politicians. Butnow 
  that you're trying to wiggle out of that andpretend you were talking about 
  people on this forum,it turns out there's only *one* person, and you 
  aren'teven sure they used that term.Moreover, "not ready for" is 
  very different from"not evolved enough." One may be 
  entirelycircumstantial--he wasn't ready for the big 
  leagues(because he hadn't trained long enough)--but thatdoesn't mean 
  *inherently* incapable."Not ready for democracy" is a statement about 
  thesituation; "not evolved enough for democracy" is aninsult to a 
  nation's people. They aren'tinterchangeable.You tried to put that 
  insult, which you yourselfmade up, in the mouths of liberals. Shame on 
  you. 

Let me ask you then Judy, do you think Iraq is "ready" for Democracy? Or do 
you think they need a "strong man" to keep their society in order? Obviously 
several on this list think it was a mistake to change the regime in Iraq. Which 
means they think Iraq would have been better off ruled under Saddam. Most of the 
Democrat party NOW believes that if they had known before what they know now, 
they would have been against the war and there would have been no regime change 
at least with their consent. So my question to you is, was removing Saddam from 
power a mistake? And do you think that Iraqi's are not ready for Democracy 
now?If removing him from power was not a mistake, what would you have replaced 
him with? Perhaps my word selection accusing liberals of thinking of Arabs as 
not being "evolved" enough would have been better put as being "not ready for", 
but either way you put it, it is still an insult to Muslim nations to think they 
are some how not ready to take the step up to a democratic form of government 
which Iraq would not have now had Democrat Monday morning Quarter backs had 
their way.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-18 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 9/17/06 9:30:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm 
  asking for a name and quote from someone whosays Iraqis aren't evolved 
  enough to handledemocracy. I gather you just made that part 
  up.

Oh, I've heard easy1 make that comment several times. He may or may not 
have used the term evolved but said they aren't "ready" for democracy. "Evolved" 
should be a clue that it wasn't a politician butsomebody on the 
list.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-18 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 9/17/06 9:30:18 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm 
  asking for a name and quote from someone whosays Iraqis aren't evolved 
  enough to handledemocracy. I gather you just made that part 
  up.

Easy1 has made either that exact statement or one similar numerous 
times to me. More likely Easy1 would have said to me Arabs aren't ready for 
democracy. So, no Judy, I didn't just make that up. I'm pretty certain others 
over the years have made similar statements on this list, I remember thinking 
"how racist" of a liberal to think Arabs or Muslims weren't good enough 
forDemocracy.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-18 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 9/17/06 9:33:33 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Funny, I 
  don't remember much arguing about invadingAfghanistan, at least not after 
  9/11. Kind of like the 50,000 body bags for US soldiers to take 
  Baghdad caused by  gas and chemical attacks.I believe it 
  was the Bushies who kept warning thatSaddam was planning to use gas and 
  chemicals againstAmerican troops.

There wasn't a lot of argument about invading Afghanistan. Sentiment was 
very strong just weeks after 911. But there were a few that did. Yes everybody 
was concerned about the use of WMD's on invading troops in Iraq but many 
especially in the media kept saying 50,000 troops would die taking Baghdad. 
Seems one of them was Sam Donaldson, not sure about that 
though.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Sep 17, 2006, at 2:31 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
 wrote:

 The current conflict continues as long as the West thinks that by
 killing enough of the third world people, we can force the rest into
 submission and servitude. It isn't working, nor will it.



 Is this really how the majority of people and the politicians in the
 USA think?

OF course not.  What do you think?  A few lunatics on the right do, and 
unfortunately they've cheated and bullied their way into power.  It 
won't last, it never does.

 Certainly not in Europe and by no means in Finland. Here I feel we are
 too understanding of everything people in the Muslim world do and we
 don't dare to criticize their values and moral thinking. They are seen
 as just the poor victims.

Not a particularly healthy attitude.

 I don't think they are in the first place victims. I think they are a
 culture and religion in deep crisis.  Something developmental arrest
 there must be, when big parts of people live in deep poverty in spite
 of the huge oil riches, and their attitudes and values are on the
 level people in Europe had in medieval times.

Yes, it's pathetic and a huge waste of resources, both material and 
intellectual.

 I think in 2001 the gross national product of the whole Arab world,
 when the oil incomes where reduced, was as big as  that of Finland's.
 Finland has 5 million inhabitants. I find that very telltale.

 In my opinion the pope addresses this issue in the speech relatively
 tactfully by a quotation of the issue that he sees to be at the core
 of the problem.
 Interesting is also his main theme of the speech that Chistianity has
 helped in the development of reasonable communication, and moral
 reasoning among the people in Europe.
 He also says that he appreciates highly science and its achievements.
 He is only critical about the narrow use of reason and intellect in
 scientific thinking.
 Which I think almost all spiritually inclined people can agree about.

 His courageous quotation was good also in that sense that it made me
 and many others read his speech, that I found to be fine. I have never
 before read a speech by a pope, and got very positively surprised. I'm
 not a Christian.

Now I'm interested in reading it too.  Know where I can find it?

Sal



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Sep 17, 2006, at 7:33 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 On Sep 17, 2006, at 2:31 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, jim_flanegin jflanegi@
 wrote:

 The current conflict continues as long as the West thinks that
 by killing enough of the third world people, we can force the
 rest into submission and servitude. It isn't working, nor will
 it.

 Is this really how the majority of people and the politicians
 in the USA think?

 OF course not.  What do you think?  A few lunatics on the
 right do, and unfortunately they've cheated and bullied
 their way into power.  It won't last, it never does.

 To present the deva's advocate position, one could
 safely say that because in theory America is a democracy,
 and because in a democracy those who get to run the country
 and set its policies can do so only because the majority
 of the population *allows* them to do so (via elections),
 America's policies towards the Third World *do*, in fact,
 represent the thinking of the American people.

Unfortunately, Barry, I agree with you--whether it's because of 
outright participation (fairly rare) or just plain apathy (much more 
common, IMO) we here in the US have allowed our leaders to get away 
with unbelievable horrors in the 3rd world.  And it's not really even 
that the information is or isn't out there (although much of it is) 
it's that people don't even ask questions--and haven't for decades.  I 
can't explain it--maybe everyone is so overmedicated they can't  think 
straight. (Not much of an excuse, I know, but the best I can come up 
with right now.)

 Americans as a whole don't care whether the people in the
 Third World live or die.
Many don't even care whether people *here* live or die--look at the 
debacle of Katrina.  And when GB's poll #s finally started to go down, 
was it over horror at what those people endured?  No, it was for purely 
selfish reasons--gas prices.

  That's why they elect leaders
 who don't care whether these people live or die and who
 design and implement their global strategies accordingly.
 The emotional reactions (and overreactions) we're seeing
 in the Arab world are because they're realizing this, too.

I think they've realized it a lot longer than most Americans, 
unfortunately.  The Islamic world, for all it's poverty, does not seem 
to lack for people who perceive things fairly clearly and who are 
willing to fight.  I might not agree with their methods, but at least 
it's not apathy. 
   



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:06 AM, Irmeli Mattsson wrote:

 Now I'm interested in reading it too.  Know where I can find it?

 Here:http://www.vatican.va/holy_father/benedict_xvi/speeches/2006/ 
 september/documents/hf_ben-xvi_spe_20060912_university- 
 regensburg_en.html

Thanks!

Sal



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 What you're seeing in the Arab world, in my opinion,
 is not *just* religious fundamentalism, but a sense of
 rage at having been treated like the niggers of the
 world for almost seven hundred years. They WON back
 then, and they've been being treated like ignoramuses
 by the losers ever since. They're understandably a
 little pissed.

OTOH, Barry, as intelligent and thoughtful as most Arabs undoubtedly 
are, they *have* allowed a small, corrupt cadre of uncaring individuals 
with little or no conscience (with, admittedly, the aid and support of 
just-as-corrupt US leaders) to drain the huge oil  wealth and 
resources for decades  for palaces, harems, etc for those select few, 
when it should have gone towards making life better for everyone.

It would be interesting to speculate whether or not these corrupt 
regimes would still be n power w/o US support--my guess is, many would. 
  Apathy is not restricted to our shores.

Sal



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 9/17/06 7:36:10 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
they 
  cared anything about these people in Third Worldcountries, Americans 
  wouldn't have allowed their leadersto have treated them the way they have, 
  for decades now. But they clearly *didn't* care, and still don't, because 
  they have done nothing to remove the leaders who treatthe Arab world 
  the way they do.

Ummm, we overthrew the Taliban and established a democracy for the people 
and continue to stay there to stabilize Afghanistan. The only thing Afghanistan 
has ever offered the world are drugs and terrorism yet we sacrifice or soldiers 
and our resources to help those people have a better way of life. We also 
overthrew Saddam, one of these leaders, who treats the Arab world the way they 
do and have established a democracy there as well in which over 12 million 
people have voted in. We also continue to pursue this goal of a democracy for 
these people with American resources and lives so that they can work out their 
own differences, reconcile with one another and join the rest of the civilized 
world and one day leave violence behind and enjoy their own prosperity. 
Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved enough to handle 
democracy and need a Saddam or that we have no business helping these people get 
rid of their dictators that steel their wealth that pours into their 
nations by the hundreds of billions of dollars. The same also say it's too 
costly or lets just do what we can to get along so we can do business and keep 
the oil flowing as cheaply as we can. No, not everybody wants to keep the 
third world nations impoverished and under the thumbs of dictators, just 
some.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:40 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 Gotta agree. I currently live in France, which has MORE
 than its share of problems. They're *also* a remarkably
 Self Important culture. But one of the things they are
 NOT is apathetic.
Any culture which invented the croissant, cappucino, and Freedom Fries 
has my vote...even if they can't speak American or even French. :)

 If a president of France had tried to
 fuck with the French people basic rights one tenth as
 greviously as Bush has fucked with Americans' basic rights,
 the entire population of France would have been out on the
 streets in protest. The country would have shut down and
 would not have moved again until the government rescinded
 its actions.

Presumably they never would have elected an illiterate moron to begin 
with...let alone a whole group of them.

Sal



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:57 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 What you're seeing in the Arab world, in my opinion,
 is not *just* religious fundamentalism, but a sense of
 rage at having been treated like the niggers of the
 world for almost seven hundred years. They WON back
 then, and they've been being treated like ignoramuses
 by the losers ever since. They're understandably a
 little pissed.

 OTOH, Barry, as intelligent and thoughtful as most Arabs
 undoubtedly are, they *have* allowed a small, corrupt cadre
 of uncaring individuals with little or no conscience (with,
 admittedly, the aid and support of just-as-corrupt US
 leaders) to drain the huge oil  wealth and resources for
 decades  for palaces, harems, etc for those select few,
 when it should have gone towards making life better for everyone.

 It would be interesting to speculate whether or not these corrupt
 regimes would still be n power w/o US support--my guess is, many
 would. Apathy is not restricted to our shores.

 I agree that the reason the Arab countries are the
 way that they are (corruption and all, imbalance of
 rich and poor and all) is because the people of those
 countries allow it to take place. However, it's a little
 different there than it is in America. In America I think
 you can safely use the word apathy because you're talk-
 ing about a people who grew up having been told that
 *they* could change things any time they wanted, through
 the voting process.

 This is not true in the Arab world. These people grew
 up in a culture in which the idea of unseating a reigning
 monarch or tranferring power to the people is unthink-
 able.

Oh, come on.  Many of these reigning monarchs, like in Saudi Arabia 
and other Gulf states, have only been there for a few decades, put in 
place to keep the oil flowing.  Most of the the people there are very 
aware of that, I would guess.

  There is no model for it; it has never happened.

Maybe that's because most of these countries weren't countries at all 
until the early 20th century--they were part of various empires--the 
Holy Roman, Ottoman, etc.  It's totally different now, and it's foolish 
to think they can't tell the difference.

 It's like trying to get a medieval serf to think of
 the idea of challening his feudal lord. It takes *reallY*
 extraordinary events (like starvation) before a people
 raised in a feudal mindset can even conceive of challeng-
 ing the feudal structure.

They've been all but starving there for decades, and yet nothing's 
happened. The rulers toss them just enough scraps to keep them from 
mass starvation, but that's about it.

 So I don't think apathy is the right word to describe
 the acceptance of the status quo we see in many Arab
 countries. It's more that many of the people really
 don't know that there is an alternative quo.

I'll give them a lot more credit for awareness than you do.  My guess 
is most know the US would crush any overt attempt at removal, hence the 
suicide bombers and other methods the US *can't* crush.

Sal



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 9/17/06 7:59:30 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Americans as a whole don't care whether the people in the Third 
  World live or die. That's why they elect leaders who don't care 
  whether these people live or die and who design and implement their 
  global strategies accordingly.Well, no, not "Americans as a 
  whole."More than 51 million Americans voted *against*George Bush 
  in 2000; more than 59 million votedagainst him in 
2004.

Yet those same 51 million and 59 million would have been led by those that 
would never have committed to liberating Afghanistan because "no nation has ever 
conquered the Afghans and we would fall into the same trap that the Russians 
fell into". "It would be another Vietnam for America". And Saddam would still be 
in power with more oil revenues than ever before, most likely without sanctions 
because the ones he had were being undermined by all those powers that wanted 
Saddam's oil. He would be in a paranoid state with his neighbor developing nukes 
and feel justified in restarting his own WMD programs again and he would be 
doing exactly what all those Arab leaders do to their own people.He would have 
beenraping , killing and impoverishing them as he had been doing. Those 
same leaders, American,would have been happy to maintain the status quo 
for "peace" sake and maintain cheap oil supplies and take the risks of leaving 
leaders like Saddam in power.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Sep 17, 2006, at 9:13 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 At least in the major cities, many if not most of
 the people you speak to *can* understand and speak
 English. It's just that unless their income is
 completely dependent on tips -- and sometimes even
 when it is -- they WON'T converse with you in English
 until you first prove your worthiness as a human being.

 You do this by attempting to speak French, and thus by
 embarrassing yourself thoroughly in public. Once you've
 done this and the other French people in the shop or
 bar or restaurant have had the opportunity to snicker
 silently at your terrible accent and grammar, the French
 are more than willing to suddenly rediscover their
 previously-lapsed language skills and speak English
 with you. It's a pecking order thang.  :-)

  Actually, I've found that most people appreciate this.  Nobody expects 
fluency from a tourist, but if you visit another country, and attempt 
to speak even a few phrases, even if you have to look them up in a 
phrase-book right as you're speaking them, people seem to treat you 
differently, as someone who is making an effort, even a small one, to 
understand a part of their culture.  I've never interpreted the 
laughter to be derisive.

Sal



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread Sal Sunshine

On Sep 17, 2006, at 10:19 AM, shempmcgurk wrote:

 --- In FairfieldLife@yahoogroups.com, Sal Sunshine [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 wrote:

 On Sep 17, 2006, at 8:19 AM, TurquoiseB wrote:

 What you're seeing in the Arab world, in my opinion,
 is not *just* religious fundamentalism, but a sense of
 rage at having been treated like the niggers of the
 world for almost seven hundred years. They WON back
 then, and they've been being treated like ignoramuses
 by the losers ever since. They're understandably a
 little pissed.

 OTOH, Barry, as intelligent and thoughtful as most Arabs
 undoubtedly
 are, they *have* allowed a small, corrupt cadre of uncaring
 individuals
 with little or no conscience (with, admittedly, the aid and
 support of
 just-as-corrupt US leaders)


 just as corrupt US leaders?

 And who would those be, Sunshine?
Pretty much all the ones you admire, Shemp.

  And why?



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 





Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread Sal Sunshine
On Sep 17, 2006, at 12:05 PM, new.morning wrote:

 If you can provide examples where the electoral college and senate
 system (as well as jerrymandering, corrupt campaign finance and
 lobbying, out-of-distric funding of local elections) etc, helps any
 minorities in the US in substantive and sustained ways, I would give
 your arguments more credence and support.

They don't, in fact institutions and practices like that do everything 
in their power to suppress minority rights and voices, something which 
Shemp supports wholeheartedly, since he is not directly affected.  He 
uses those and other such arguments as diversionary tactics.

Sal



To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!' 
Yahoo! Groups Links

* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/

* Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional

* To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/join
(Yahoo! ID required)

* To change settings via email:
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

* Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 




Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 9/17/06 11:59:24 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 
  Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved enough  
   to handle democracy and need a SaddamWho has 
  said that? Can you give us *just one* name  and quote? 
 Strangely, I have a Kuwaiti friend who has said 
  exactly this.  Her family and friends went through hell when 
  Saddam invaded Kuwait in  1990 (she was here in America through it 
  all), and the Americans saved  them. Yet she was dead-set against 
  invading and toppling Saddam in  2003. She is incredibly 
  anti-Bush.

It seems I heard a democratic Senator or congressman who said Iraqis were 
better off under Saddam just recently. Was it Jay Rockafeller? I have also hear 
numerous people some on this list have said the middle eastern countries aren't 
ready for democracy. Easy1 was one of them.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 9/17/06 9:41:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved 
  enough to handle democracy and need a SaddamWho has said that? 
  Can you give us *just one* nameand quote?

Yes , A democratic Senator ot Congressman just recently said that Iraq was 
better off under Saddam. I think it was Jay Rockafeller. I'm pretty darned sure 
Offworld and Easy1would agree.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 9/17/06 9:40:32 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Yet 
  those same 51 million and 59 million would have been led by those that 
  would never have committed to liberating Afghanistan  because "no 
  nation has ever conquered the Afghans and we would fall into the same 
  trap that the Russians fell into".Sorry, but imaginary scenarios about 
  what Goreor Kerry would have done do not an argument make.As for 
  our having "liberated" Afghanistan, youdon't read the news much, I 
  gather.

No those were common liberal arguments why we should not invade 
Afghanistan.Kind of like the 50,000 body bags for US soldiers to take 
Baghdad caused by gasand chemical attacks.I never heard any 
conservative arguments why we should not invade Afghanistan.Yes Afghanistan is 
liberated and has a democratically elected government. Are things perfect and 
peaceful? No.But definitely better off now than under the 
Taliban.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___



Re: [FairfieldLife] Re: The Pope's speech on Faith and reason

2006-09-17 Thread MDixon6569






In a message dated 9/17/06 9:13:01 P.M. Central Daylight Time, 
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

  
  
  
  
  
  In a message dated 9/17/06 9:41:17 A.M. Central Daylight Time, 
  [EMAIL PROTECTED]com writes:
  Unfortunately, there are many who say they aren't evolved 
enough to handle democracy and need a SaddamWho has said 
that? Can you give us *just one* nameand 
  quote?
  
  Yes , A democratic Senator ot Congressman just recently said that Iraq 
  was better off under Saddam. I think it was Jay Rockafeller. I'm pretty darned 
  sure Offworld and Easy1would agree.
   

By the way Judy, Google "better off under Saddam", you might be 
surprised.
__._,_.___





To subscribe, send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Or go to: 
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/FairfieldLife/
and click 'Join This Group!'








   



  



  
  Your email settings: Individual Email|Traditional 
  Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required) 
  Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch to Fully Featured 
   
Visit Your Group 
   |
  
Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use
   |
  
   Unsubscribe 
   
 

  




__,_._,___