Everything you wanted to know (except the price):
http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/D60/D60P.HTM
Cary Enoch R... aka Enoch's Vision, Inc., Peach County, Georgia
http://www.enochsvision.com -- Behind all these manifestations is the
one radiance, which shines through all things. The function
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Julian Vrieslander
Subject: [filmscanners] Nikon D100
Nikon announces its prosumer 6MP digital SLR. Price rumored
to be under $2k.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02022105nikond100.asp
I wonder why Canon is lagging so far behind other major
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of David Kent
I concur... Definitely do not skimp on the scanner. While a
high end scanner cannot guarantee the best output, it should
give you the best image to start with. Just make sure that
every piece of equipment in your workflow is correctly
A few of you seem to have not noticed the earlier admin msg.
Mails must be sent in plain text only.
Thank you a thousand times:-)
For those of you who detest HTML mail as I do there's good news if you
use Outlook (not Outlook Express) as your email client.
This article describes a new
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt
From: Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
environments. Having worked at Microsoft for six years I
know enough
to be cynical about everything that they do.
Thought you folks might enjoy these:
2/ 'Think
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Julian Robinson
In this case as Nikon advise, you do have to uninstall 2.5
first and run
regsweep before installing ver 3.
I did this with Win98-nearly-SE (Win98 non-SE with all
service packs) and
had no probs.
In the case of a minor
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Shunith Dutt
Sent: Wednesday, 19 December, 2001 01:52
James/Enoch
You know, i must have spent an hour hunting for it on the
Nikon sites... going in thru www.nikon.com and then following
links... on the us site (it's a black and white effect)
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Grove
You should always uninstall the Windows versions and also run
the regsweep utilitity in the Utils folder of that versions
download, then install the new version after reboot.
I made registry snapshots before and after installing NS
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Brian
D. Plikaytis
The site http://www.nikontechusa.com says this is for Windows
XP. Did you find that it improved your Win2K version's performance?
It's only been 24 hours since I installed NikonScan NS) 3.12 so there's
not enough mileage on it
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of James Grove
V3.1.2 has been available in Japan for a week. The Driver
file for XP is the same as in previous versions but the Scan
software is different. Today it appeared without warning in
English on the Nikon USA Tech site.
Specifically:
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 7.3 Available
Ed would you change the file name as well please as Gozilla didn't
like it as being the same as in 7.2 and I wasn't sure that 7.3 was
coming down.
I've updated my web page.
At 02:29 22-11-01 +, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
[Justification for filmscanners posting: GIMP functionality for editing
photos as compared with Photoshop]
K, people, I'm curious if anyone here is using GIMP for Windows and whether
it's any good and whether it handles all of our common tasks with
At 13:03 30-10-01 +, you wrote:
Svante,
Thats the problem. it isnt!
To be supported out of the box in Win2K your firewire card must be listed as:
Texas Instruments (refers specifically to the chipset not the OEM) OHCI
Compliant IEEE 1394 Host Controller. That applies to the majority
At 20:18 05-10-01 -0700, you wrote:
Just got this back from Nikon:
It is known by Nikon that there are problems with Dual Processor PC's,
both
Windows and Mac. Although the Product Brochures do not specifically say
the 2CPU machines will not work, neither do they say it does.
That's a bunch
At 11:46 04-10-01 +0100, you wrote:
I see that a lot of people have been reporting that NikonScan
is very buggy and crashes a lot. I am having similar problems.
Has anyone actually got this software to work under W2K/dual CPUs?
There don't seem to be any reports of solutions that I can find
(but
At 03:32 03-10-01 -0400, you wrote:
Wire, I like your review better than Bruce's!!! And I haven't even read
Bruce's!
I guess I'm a born skeptic and have never completely trusted any review in
any publication that accepts advertising for the products being
reviewed. There's too much
Excellent objective review:
http://www.creativepro.com/printerfriendly/story/14539.html
Cary Enoch Reinstein aka Enoch's Vision, Inc., Peach County, Georgia
http://www.enochsvision.com/, http://www.bahaivision.com/ -- Behind all
these manifestations is the one radiance, which shines through
At 01:34 21-09-01 -0500, LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
Does the license allow me to do that? Usually OEM software bundled with
hardware
doesn't allow that so I'm not sure in this case.
Usually all software (bundled or not) allow one to give away the software,
or in some cases even resell it, as long
At 07:57 21-09-01 -0500, you wrote:
I think you want to be careful. I disagree with this position. Most bundled
OEM software is licensed to the computer that has the equipment attached. I
would carefully read the license agreement before sending it to your son.
It's not worth risking his career
I think you want to be careful. I disagree with this position.
Most bundled
OEM software is licensed to the computer that has the equipment
attached. I
would carefully read the license agreement before sending it to your son.
It's not worth risking his career over this piece of
At 14:22 21-09-01 -0400, you wrote:
At 10:06 21-09-01 -0400, Austin Franklin wrote:
These software EULAs can say/claim anything they want, but the law can be
entirely different than what they claim! I do not know your specific
situation, and I am in no way endorsing software piracy.
At 18:45 20-09-01 -0400, you wrote:
Joe
I bought the Nikon 4000 from Ritz Camera and it came with Genuine Fractals.
I think that it is only the grey market products that don't come with it.
I bought my LS4000 retail at KEH Cameras in Atlanta. It came with Genuine
Fractals though it wasn't
In case you haven't seen it, this incredible side-by-side photo comparison:
http://www.wsbradio.com/about_us/scottsladesfootnotes.html
Cary Enoch Reinstein aka Enoch's Vision, Inc., Peach County, Georgia
http://www.enochsvision.com/, http://www.bahaivision.com/ -- Behind all
these
At 23:59 09-09-01 -0700, Ron Carlson wrote:
Hi Les, I looked but couldn't find it. Where on Katrin's web site did you
find it. Regards Ron
http://www.digitalretouch.org/download2.html#ch678_images
Scroll down to smart_sharpen.atn
PS Actions that creates a custom edge mask for you image
At 19:24 09-09-01 +, you wrote:
I find
Nik Sharpener utterly useless-- it ALWAYS oversharpens, no matter what
settings I use.
Agreed. I've seen it in action and think it's grossly overpriced for what
little it does as opposed to custom Photoshop actions or packages like
UltraSharpenPro.
At 23:40 31-08-01 -0400, you wrote:
Cary
Can you tell me in detail how vuescan might help to remove crud and
improve sharpness in the Nikon Super coolscan 4000.
Download a trial copy and see if you're pleased with the results. It
doesn't cost anything to try it. All the film that I've
At 06:08 30-08-01 -0400, you wrote:
At 23:44 29-08-01 -0700, Henning Wulff wrote:
In general LCD's are quite useless for photoediting as they
color/contrast shift when you move your head. This also means that even
if you don't move your head relative to the LCD, all the corners
will
At 23:44 29-08-01 -0700, Henning Wulff wrote:
In general LCD's are quite useless for photoediting as they
color/contrast shift when you move your head. This also means that even if
you don't move your head relative to the LCD, all the corners will display
the same image range with different
At 11:21 29-08-01 +0200, you wrote:
Check http://www.vmware.com :-)
I use Vuescan (http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html) for scanning from Linux),
VMWare is pretty useful for running Windows 95, 98, NT or 2000 under Linux.
I have yet to find a distribution of Linux that recognizes a firewire
At 06:07 19-08-01 +0200, Thys wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Have you actually worked with a Nikon LS-4000? It's a very fine piece of
machinery that is easily worth its price. I definitely wouldn't buy on the
basis
- Original Message -
True; but tests I've seen so far indicates that the Polaroid SS4000 and
Canon 4000 are on par with the Nikon LS4000 (some rate them actually
better
than the Nikon in some respects) IMO the Nikon is overpriced and people
buy
the name more than anything else.
I'm looking for some recommendations on what image management software
folks
are using. The size of my image collection, both scanned and unscanned
is
growing past my normal haphazard filing systems capabilities. Given the
amount of images being scanned, anyone have any
At 13:17 14-08-01 +, you wrote:
Cary wrote:
This technique can help many balky applications to run correctly on Win2K.
This (below) sounds like a good answer to a bad problem. Before I try it
on my next install, though, has anyone here tried this type of custom
installation on Win98?
The
At 00:53 13-08-01 +0100, Steve Greenbank wrote:
Not wishing to sound to gloomy, but the advice sounds like a we have no
idea - but it might work if we re-install everything. The good news is that
it often does - the bad news is IME it more often doesn't.
Slightly OT but this brings to mind a
At 19:11 12-08-01 +0100, David Gordon wrote:
rlb [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote on Sun, 12 Aug 2001 07:31:43 -0400
I would appreciate some thoughts from those that use Silverfast.
It has a very steep learning curve. It is hard to use. It is unintuitive.
It has a very poor user interface.
It make
At 21:24 01-08-01 +0100, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
The Athlon/RAM combination is very good value at the moment (actually that
combination is silly money). If you buy as a complete system you should
have no trouble - though it is fair to say that W2K and some varieties of
Athlon motherboard do not get
At 12:51 24-07-01 +1000, Julian Robinson wrote:
I am one of those who has not found the problems that others report with
Nikonscan; I have found it to do what it should do, quickly and with great
control.
In general I agree with that and especially appreciate the control that NS
gives me.
At 19:29 15-07-01 +0100, Tony Sleep wrote:
The other major issue for system stability is MS COM components.
Registry entries for these get routinely messed up on every machine here,
but are easily fixed again via Norton Utilities Windoctor|Repair All. This
is the first place I look now if I get
At 15:58 15-07-01 -0500, Kerry Thompson wrote:
I recently installed a LS-30 on a new Win 2000 professional system. The
computer recognizes the scanner at startup but does not seem to install a
driver for it. Each startup the computer again recognizes the scanner and
begins the new hardware
At 23:23 15-07-01 +0100, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
NS 3.1 can be observed in Task Manager while it's running. While
it doesn't
impact both CPUs very much it does claim practically all
available RAM and
virtual memory (99%!). Before I start the application there is
approximately 670 MB of
At 14:30 14-07-01 +0100, Tony Sleep wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:19:28 -0700 Pat Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
the
most infamous being 3rd party manufacturer video drivers
Yup! Absolutely (one reason why I conservatively stick to Matrox is that -
eventually anyhow - their drivers
At 18:10 12-07-01 +, you wrote:
Steve wrote:
Most of the information I have seenis via http://www.cdmediaworld.com and
links from there. My own personal experience is that CD-RW is more
temperamental.
Out of 20 Kodak Gold CD-Rs distributed, I've had no reports of problems.
At 12:15 11-07-01 +1200, Paul Hillier wrote:
I haven't been on this list for a long time, so I hope this question
hasn't been asked recently.
I am trying to set up a Nikon LS-1000 slide scanner with Windows 2000,
is this possible?
There aren't any drivers for the LS1000 in Win2K. You might try
At 10:15 11-07-01 +1000, you wrote:
Ian wrote:
It is and so is CompassProfile Scanner and ColorSynergy, etc.
[snip]
Dan and Franz from ColorBlind fame and all their products are
real cool and quite reasonably priced.
Ian, do you have some URLs for these products?
At 20:30 10-07-01 -0400, rafeb wrote:
Your complaint regarding NikonScan 3.1 being buggy
is surprising to me. I had some initial problems
getting NS installed, but it has not been remotely
buggy since then. The installation issues turned
out to be due to device conflicts.
Which leads me to
At 20:43 10-07-01 -0700, you wrote:
It's best generally to use CD-R as they are generally more reliable
than CD-RW and they are cheaper too.
Can you supply me with any references for this statement, in terms of
reliability?
This concerns me since I use CD-RW for most of my CD file storage.
At 22:31 10-07-01 -0700, you wrote:
Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) wrote:
On 10-04-98 I posted the following to this list:
Let's not forget the corollary to that expression is with Nikon you don't
get what you pay for. By that I mean customer support. I learned that
unhappy lesson
At 06:36 11-07-01 -0400, Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) wrote:
http://www.splashofcolor.com/pages/praxisoft/compassprofile.html
http://www.picto.com/colorsynergyA.html
Google hasn't gotten so good these days that you can find product names
like this immediately. I wanted to check them
At 07:09 11-07-01 -0400, I wrote:
It was admittedly difficult for me to be objective because of prior bad
experiences with an LS4000
and Nikon technical support. From list feedback it seems that times have
changed for the better to
some degree. I'd have bought a Polaroid SS4000 in the blink
At 14:25 11-07-01 -0400, Raphael Bustin wrote:
Vuescan recognized my 8000, over Firewire,
although it didn't get much farther than that.
In a couple of back-and-forths with Ed, there
was no indication that the Firewire connectivity
was an issue.
Vuescan recognizes my LS4000/firewire but its
At 02:04 09-07-01 -0700, Arthur Entlich wrote:
Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) wrote:
The SS120 produces superior 35mm scans to the SS4000 and wipes the floor
with the 4000ED. If the 8000 scans anything like the 4000ED then I'm real
sorry for you Nikon users. The SS120 comes mighty
At 20:23 09-07-01 +, Lynn Allen wrote:
The main point is that regardless of how *monolithic* sofware companies
believe themselves to be (Microsoft and Adobe come to mind), and how
*infallable* some engineers occasionally consider themselves to be (no
present company included or excluded),
At 15:15 09-07-01 -0700, Arthur Entlich wrote:
Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) wrote:
I'm musing whether Nikon has a factory in the deep south of the US.
I'm noting a very strong allegiance to the company coming from those
environs...
Is my residence in the Deep South some sort
The SS120 produces superior 35mm scans to the SS4000 and wipes the floor
with the 4000ED. If the 8000 scans anything like the 4000ED then I'm real
sorry for you Nikon users. The SS120 comes mighty close to Imacon quality
Comments like the one quoted above don't really add anything useful to
At 20:16 29-06-01 +0600, Gracia M. Littauer wrote:
Yo gang,
Anyone using linux (SUSE 7.2) with a Nikon LS 2000??? Drivers?
I'd like to know also re: LS4000. Until then I won't be able to wean myself
away from Windows even with Win4Lin (runs Photoshop in Linux).
Cary Enoch Reinstein aka
At 15:25 29-06-01 -0500, Robert Kehl wrote:
BTW, all this discussion on longevity brings me to the same
conclusion as last time we had a prolonged archiving
discussion here - we need as much of *both* careful neg
storage *and* systematic digital archiving rearchiving as
we can be
At 19:29 29-06-01 -0500, you wrote:
This discussion has led me to one conclusion that seems inescapable.
Clearly it's important to refresh our media assets every few years to keep
pace with technology. Perhaps the archival method with the greatest
longevity and 'universality' today is a
At 16:02 20-06-01 -0500, Robert Kehl wrote:
I've been thinking about buying a Matrox G450 with the dual head feature due
to recommendations on this list. I just bought a workstation that will come
with a Matrox G400. For scanning and tweaking in PS6 is this card going to
do as well as the G450
At 13:05 16-06-01 +1000, Rob Geraghty wrote:
Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Has anyone had any problems with NikonScan 3.1 in Windows 2000?
Sounds like Nikonscan 3.1 is worse than 3.0 at least on W2K. Does anyone
know whether 3.1 attempts to fix the jaggies
At 07:23 16-06-01 -0700, you wrote:
When performing a scan on the LS4000 using Nikonscan 3.1, two motor noises
are heard: 1) a deep humming sound, and 2)a stepping noise that sounds a
bit like a cheap plastic metronome. This second noise changes cadence
depending upon the resolution chosen - the
Has anyone had any problems with NikonScan 3.1 in Windows 2000?
NikonScan 3.1 only worked correctly for me for the first two days. After
that it always displayed the message No active devices found. I looked in
TWAIN.LOG to see if there were any debug messages (you can usually find
this file
At 16:38 09-06-01 +0100, James Grove wrote:
Er it shouldn`t at least it doesn't on mine (V3.1)
-Original Message-
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of AR Studio
Just discovered with Nikon IV that ICE (normal setting, at least) will
act as ROC (color restoration) if you have an image
At 08:27 09-06-01 -0700, shAf wrote:
Rob writes ...
I just tried scanning a slide and outputting a colour TIFF
and an IR one. It was very educational. Any sort of mark,
scratch or dust spot is utterly black in the IR scan.
Some of the image is also visible as is some of the grain,
At 17:37 09-06-01 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 6/9/2001 4:27:15 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Just curious but is any of Nikon's ICE code in firmware or is it all
contained in NikonScan?
It's a software algorithm in NikonScan. The scanner itself just
returns
At 14:14 24-03-01 -0500, Marc S. Fogel wrote:
BH Photo has the LS-40 in stock.
I'm waiting for a bunch of reports on this list stating that the Nikon
mechanism is mechanically sound, free of jaggies, etc. Only then will I buy
one. I was an early adapter of the LS-1000 which ended up as a
At 18:19 15-03-01 -0600, Henry Richardson wrote:
Recently there have been lots of messages concerning writing to CDs and
some people have had occasional problems getting a good CD made. For the
last couple of years I have been using a freeware program called Cacheman
that has a graphical
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Austin wrote:
The right tools for the job. Having a 'resolution' of at
least 1280x1024 is not untypical for most people who do
image editing. In fact, I'd bet most on this list have
1600 x 1200.
Geeze, Austin. Several people have
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
"Quoton" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
down any more. However, Photoshop (5.5) is noticeably slower on Win2K than
Win98.
That's highly abnormal and indicative that something is not right with your Win2K
installation. It could be any of a
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of ALLM Rose
I am considering whether to reload Win98SE, WinMe or Win2000 Professional on
my Athlon 700 (256MB SDRAM) system. I am currently using Win98SE, Adobe
Photoshop 6.0, printing with an Epson 870 through WiziWYG color profiles,
and scanning
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of IronWorks
Sent: Monday, 26 February, 2001 13:57
Posted today on comp.graphics.apps.photoshop:
" c r a b" [EMAIL PROTECTED] mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
message
news:97ck27$2gn9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry Berman
Some very timely issues here. I'm looking at getting a new system within
the next month for scanning and Photoshop. I have a SS4000 and am thinking
seriously of Win2K Professional, or another Win98 SE computer. Therefore
I'm waiting with
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of shAf
The Kodak scanner, so well received because of hype, underscored the
old buyer beware clich "you get what you pay for!" ... and should
warn us this Canon scanner should be welcomed only with some caution
and only after testing.
I'll
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of tom
I am not sure is it possible, but I am looking for software/algorithms which
enable me to correct photos taken with wrong angle. I mean the film plane and
object are not parallel. Do you hear about something like this ?
Andromeda's LensDoc filter
73 matches
Mail list logo
