> The page is not indexed, nor is it likely to be until it and a lot of
other pages are
> finished, as it's really part of Mk2 website.
Tony, I'm pleased the Mk2 website is still bubbling on the back burner. Your
aliasing page is very clear and useful. It bodes well for Mk2..
ntinuous inking
system.
Details of the Piezography mailing list, and much else, are
at http://www.inkjetmall.com/store/piezographyBW.html
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In a message dated 1/10/01 4:40:35 PM US Eastern Standard
Time,
> [EMA
> Is it normal for the LS-30 to automatically eject the film
from the scanner
> after a certain amount of time of inactivity?
Yes (well, mine does anyway)
Peter Marquis-Kyle
resolution for inkjet printers.
Good luck, and keep asking questions...
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 26, 2001 10:07 AM
Subject: filmscanners: LS 2000 newbie question
I have recently purchas
ts on the Piezography mailing list
this Epson 1200 setup works well, but no better than a
4-tone printer like the Epson 1160 (for which CIS is an
option).
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Hi Tom
If you haven't already seen it, take a look at this site:
http://www.photoscientia.co.uk/Review.htm
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: "Tom Christiansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, January 30, 2001 4:
hi.res.cse.dmu.ac.uk/htdig/
But don't be shy about asking any on-topic question on the
list; people are helpful around here, and (mostly) not too
snobbish.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Hi Mark
Thanks for the recommendation for 'Amazing Wipes'. I dashed out to the
local Coles supermarket in Brisbane, but couldn't find anything by
that name. Where do you get 'em?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
> I have a slightly contrary view about the 'essentiality' of
this neg had been making bromide prints.
Anybody want to buy an EL-Nikkor and a nice Leitz Valoy enlarger?)
What sort of stuff are you scanning to blow up to 24x36? That's really
big!
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Brisbane Australia
Tony Sleep wrote
> Personally I prefer enlargers with AN glass on the base side, open
frame on the
> emulsion side, the best of both worlds. There has to be an
aftermarket
> opportunity here for popular scanners, I'd happily pay 80-100GBP for
a really
> good metal, half-glass adjustable strip hol
vides some tangible improvements,
before I install 3.0.
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: "Edwin Eleazer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2001 9:41 AM
Subject: filmscanners: NikonScan 3.0 with LS-30 & Ls-2000
pdf.
Thanks Edwin, I'll do just that...
Peter Marquis-Kyle
(where 1.31 is the firmware
version).
What does yours say?
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe' in the title or
body
Jan
Looks like you have version 1.05. If I were you I would update to version 1.1.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
> Peter,
>
> Mine says "Nikon Coolscan IV ED 1.05 @ USB"
> Is this the Fir
Watch out, I think Tony's caught it...
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2002 1:45 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] ADMIN: List charter alterations
> Naturally I have received a complaint about my summary blockage of the Hard
Art
Thanks for the correction. I'm sorry I attributed the question to you -- an
innocent mistake.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: "Arthur Entlich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, February 26, 2002 4:02 PM
Sub
not stop anyone from stealing the image.
Just viewing the HTML source will reveal the location and filename of the real
image, which can then be downloaded.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL P
the Strip Film Holder (FH-2) which I usually
prefer.
I generally use the Nikon software (Nikonscan) which is very convenient, but
sometimes resort to Vuescan when I want to get the most out of a difficult
original.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
a SCSI scanner and if VueScan doesn't find your SCSI scanner, you
may need to download and install ASPI (you don't need this for USB scanners)."
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to
ng by repeated passes.
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
Shunith Dutt wrote:
> Out of town for a few days...
Thanks for telling us, Shunith, but you really need to send your
message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enjoy yourself!
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail
he Canon FS-4000US.
I haven't tried scanning cross-processed negs, but I suggest you try
the "Lock image color" setting (it's on the Device tab -- you'll need
to display all the options).
Peter Marquis-Kyle
-
ach your 10D,
and probably a strobe for illumination.
Something to consider...
Peter Marquis-Kyle
www.marquis-kyle.com.au
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners&#
Paul D. DeRocco wrote:
>> From: Peter Marquis-Kyle
>>
>> You might consider using a Canon FD Auto Bellows with the slide
>> duplicator accessory and, say, a 50mm macro lens. This would make
>> the business of framing, magnification and focus straightforward.
>&
k.
Austin, recent versions of Vuescan can create an
ICC device profile by scanning and analysing an IT8
or Q60 target. Of course this is only good for that
particular scanner and type of positive transparency
film, and can't adjust for the vagaries of lighting,
subject or came
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
> I just checked my copy of VueScan
> ...It does not present a visual histogram
> of the scanned image...
I guess you are using a pretty old version of Vuescan, Laurie?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
www.marquis-ky
the location of the comand that produces a visual histogram.
Laurie: Look at the top of the screen. See those tabs labelled
"Prev Hist" and "Scan Hist". Click those to see histograms of
the preview image and scanned image
Brad Davis wrote:
> Further, if you find that Laurie's response was
> anything other than responsible, you have
> demonstrated a complete lack of understanding
> of what she so gently said. She didn't agree with
> him, she suggested only that those who disagree
> provide evidence to support their
filmscanning is now
> just another tool in the box. As such, the Prodig list, or various
other
> lists or forums, may support better-balanced debate.
If you do shut down the list I won't blame you. What you've done for
me -- through your scanner reviews and this list --
Berry Ives wrote:
> Think about having someone shoot some T400 CN film at your wedding.
Then
> you can have some fun scanning and printing B&W
Nah, too easy. What about Kodachrome. LS-30s just love Kodachrome :)
Peter Ma
Australian distributor for PEC products -- NuLab in
Melbourne
www.nulab.com.au
They don't mention PEC products on their website, but they responded
quickly
to my email, and promptly sent me the spray and wipes I ordered.
Peter Marquis-K
sily averted by reducing the size of
an input slot (with, for example, a piece of credit card held on with adhesive
tape).
Does this apply to the current model, does anyone know?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
www.marquis-kyle.com.au
Dieder Bylsma wrote:
> try using it without ICE and see what happens
Thanks for the suggestion, Dieder. I just did a test with and without ICE -- it
made no difference to the waves.
Any other ideas?
Peter Marquis-K
it properly.
In the meantime I am still interested to hear speculations about the cause, and
to hear of any other sightings of this phenomenon.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTE
ted slide -- the waves are still there.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
wo different computers, with NikonScan and Vuescan, with the
three different film holding options I have. Your suggestion of a mechanical
glitch is very plausible.
Thanks for thinking about it, Tony. And thanks (again) for keeping this list
going -- the dwindling crew of old fogies
er you can
take to the end of the lead screw with a screwdriver...
http://www.pearsonimaging.com/articles/howto/ls5000cleaning.html
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with &#
On 3:16 PM Sam McCandless wrote:
> I'm guessing Thunderbird is Windows-only.
>
> I'm on a Mac and still use Eudora. It lets me quote selectively, and
> I like its spam filter.
Thunderbird is available (free!) for Windows, OSX and Linux:
http://www.mozilla.com/thunderbir
Tony Sleep wrote:
> The list should now be operating normally again.
Thanks Tony, let's see if this reply shows up on the list.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTE
discussions, some of which concern film
scanning.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
subscriber since, oh, ever so long ago
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'uns
n to try other ways to digitise them. I have done
some quick and dirty experiments with Canon 5d (Mark I), Canon FD Auto
Bellows, 50mm FD macro lens, and slide copier attachment. The results
looked hopef
Norman Carver wrote:
> Peter,
> Re your query on copying:
>
> I used the holder that came with the Nikon 8000 --not perfect but workable
> I set it vertically in a small aluminum channel, with emulsion (dull)
> side towards camera.
> Behind this is curved white paper lit by two electronic flash at
eston here. The Polaroid filter is useful for Kodachrome
slides, for which the Vuescan infra-red cleaning (or Nikon ICE) won't
work. But I would save the 'uncleaned' files in the archive colle
.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Unsubscribe by mail to listser...@halftone.co.uk, with 'unsubscribe
filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or
body
etter by letter,
instead of reading them as ordinary words. But I don't
mind - in Tony's messages they are part of his accent, his
tone of voice, even a reminder of usenet, bulletin boards,
telex, telegraphic code books...
:-)
Peter Marquis-Kyle
| I fear this ancient language may have be
scan a pixel more than the frame
width. In the other direction there is not the same problem -- the
scanner can capture beyond 36mm.
Do other makes or models of 35mm scanners score any better?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
aking it -- I can frame tighter, re-level
horizons, re-plumb columns, and add sham black borders, even fake sprocket holes
and frame numbers. I have already learned more about Photoshop than I ever knew
about darkroom printing
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
r on the Czech Nikon site
http://www.nikon.cz/ls4000.htm ). It looks like it does exactly the same job as
the FH-2.
If it does have full-frame openings, perhaps I should buy one. Or just take a
file to my FH-2.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Thanks for that, Vlad
Peter Marquis-Kyle
> 24.1 x 36.0 mm as I measured it. Extra 0,5 mm will be useful - it is rather
> difficult to position the film precisely
27; 35mm SLRs.
Viewfinder accuracy was one of my reasons for replacing my Pentax SPs with Canon
F-1s. I still use those F-1s and appreciate their accurate viewfinders, even
though I no longer use my Leitz enlarger (whose film carrier did not crop the
frame).
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Too obsessive?
16bit IR files of the same frames. Here's what I found...
Thanks for that report Rob.
Like you, I use both Vuescan and NikonScan with my LS-30 (VS for careful work,
NS for quick-and-dirty jobs). Your report gives me the confidence to replace NS
2.5 with NS 3.1.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
> being in a postilion to do the same thing for the 35mm scanners - LS4000,
...don't you just love it when the spell checker does that? It just reminds me
how difficult it is to get good postilions these days.
Frank Nichols asked
> Can anyone point me to a good/active mailing list for discussions of ink jet
> printers (specifically Epson) used to print my scans?
Sign up for the epson-inkjet list at http://www.leben.com/lists/
It is both good and ACTIVE!
Peter Marquis-Kyle
the wizard and
(unlike me), keep a record of what does and doesn't work, you should find the
answer.
Then (unlike me) you can contribute a really useful post to this list.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
size'
will tell you how to do it.
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Baby Rollei, or from a Brownie Starflash?
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> I have never had to scan Kodachrome slides before (and never thought I'
> have to!) but, as luck would have it, I have just been handed a hug
uding
Silverfast software, SCSI card, cables, etc. See
http://www.scannerplace.com.au/p4000.htm
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Brisbane
- Original Message -
From: "Tim Lumsdaine" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> In all of the correspondence I've followed on this site, I've hardly
n_e.htm )
28.5mm x 28.5mm -- Instamatic 126 cartridge film -- mostly cheap snapshot
cameras (see http://user.itl.net/~kypfer/126film.htm )
24mm x 24mm -- 35mm film exposed in early Robot cameras (see
http://www.cameraquest.com/robot1.htm )
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Winsor Crosby asked
> Could you not combine the scanned black and white separations as
> layers in PhotoShop?
Yep. See this interesting example: http://www.loc.gov/exhibits/empire/
Peter Marquis-Kyle
under Win 95, Win 98SE, Win
2000.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Rob
I don't remember having to do that, but perhaps I did. If it's relevant, my SCSI
card is a Tekram DC-315U.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
- Original Message -
From: "Rob Geraghty" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Peter wrote:
> >Your presumption is correct. I have ha
the other computer (God it's slow). I'll run
some wires to another room soon and get it out of my studio, just as soon as I
finish a couple of jobs...
Peter Marquis-Kyle
ium format film in the LS-8000. What about the LS-4000? The capacity for
unattended scanning of whole rolls of film is a fine idea, but not useful if the
scans are out of focus over part of the image.
Since doing these tests I have avoided using the Strip Film Adapter for anything
but quick-and-dirty scans.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
e to do
the tests? Here's the web page with the instructions again:
http://members.austarmetro.com.au/~julian/ls2000-focus.htm
Peter Marquis-Kyle
is
> that there for projection?
My guess is that the matt side of the glass has an "anti newton's rings"
treatment -- put that side in contact with the film.
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
e the Feeder did not. I used the test method
developed by Julian Robinson (
http://members.austarmetro.com.au/~julian/ls2000-focus.htm ) which I commend to
anyone with a Nikon film scanner.
An hour of testing was enough to show me what works well (and what doesn't) with
my scanner.
Peter Marquis-Kyle
Rob Geraghty wrote:
> Dave wrote:
> >I love making 24x36" prints on an Epson 7000 from 800 speed color negs
> >shot with a $90 point and shoot. Why? Because they look great.
>
> What are you scanning the 800 speed film with, Dave?
Ah Rob, I expect you'll be reassured when you read the answer to
ed an 11K scan would fit) would be
> prohibitive
No need to do that Rob. Even in the wilds of south east Queensland there are
competent people with drum scanners at the ready.
Or I can introduce you to a bloke in Brisbane with a couple of Imacons who knows
what he's doing
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
nd MIME attachment.
The listserver will bounce emails which contain large attachments."
Cheers
Peter Marquis-Kyle
69 matches
Mail list logo
