Williams, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The problem occurs when I *reply to* messages, not when I initiate a
topic. Perhaps I didn't stress that aspect enough.
I already noticed that.
I notice that a few other users have the same situation.
Your posts arrive on the digest duplicated, which
On Oct 11, 2006, at 8:10 PM, Williams, Jim wrote:
One list member has asked me very politely if I could cease this
practice and another occasionally sends me a few return emails
stressing a particular french obscenity.
I would like to comply with the polite request and would hope that
On Oct 12, 2006, at 1:12 AM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi all,
I had no idea that mysignature was being received as an
attachment. I thought it was in the body of the emails.
Is this a bother to anyone?
No one has ever mentioned it.
I don't see any attachments in your emails to the list.
At 10/12/2006 01:12 AM, Chuck Israels wrote:
I had no idea that mysignature was being received as an attachment. I
thought it was in the body of the emails.
Is this a bother to anyone?
No one has ever mentioned it.
I just go through my attachment folder once a week and delete the
At 11:41 PM -0400 10/11/06, Williams, Jim wrote:
OK--it APPEARS I got rid of ONE attachment by reinstalling some kind
of S/MIME control that I had installed earlier in OWA. It doesn't
say what the control is or does--perhaps some of you know--but
it SEEMS to have zapped ONE of the
John,
What's happening now? I got a report that now the MESSAGE ITSELF is being duplicated...
Do you see that??
Jim
From: John HowellSent: Thu 12-Oct-06 11:10To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments
At 11:41 PM -0400 10/11/06, Williams, Jim wrote:
OK
There is an easier solution to this. Mailman2, the host software of
this list has an option to disable attachment. The user group I admin
enables this option, or digest gets messed up.
--
- Hiro
Hiroaki Honshuku, A-NO-NE Music, Boston, MA
http://a-no-ne.com http://anonemusic.com
On 11 Oct 2006 at 22:12, Chuck Israels wrote:
I had no idea that mysignature was being received as an
attachment. I thought it was in the body of the emails.
I'm not seeing it as an attachment.
Is this a bother to anyone?
No one has ever mentioned it.
I'm seeing a two-part message:
On 12 Oct 2006 at 11:31, Williams, Jim wrote:
What's happening now? I got a report that now the MESSAGE ITSELF is
being duplicated... Do you see that??
It is being duplicated, once in plain text, once in HTML. The Digest
just converts both to text.
Get a decent email client and you won't
On 12 Oct 2006 at 10:52, Ken Moore wrote:
Your posts arrive on the digest duplicated, which I don't recall
seeing from anyone else (though most posts carry more of the thread
than is necessary to establish context, as I have frequently pointed
out).
This is because he's now sending his posts
Nope.
John
At 11:31 AM -0400 10/12/06, Williams, Jim wrote:
John,
What's happening now? I got a report that now the MESSAGE ITSELF is
being duplicated...
Do you see that??
Jim
From: John Howell
Sent: Thu 12-Oct-06 11:10
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid
On 11 Oct 2006 at 20:10, Williams, Jim wrote:
I send my Finale posts via an email system established by my employer
using MS Outlook Web Access. For some reason unknown to me,
attachments are created when I reply to posts on this list, consisting
of a copy of the message to which I am
- Original Message -
From: Williams, Jim [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: finale@shsu.edu
Sent: Thursday, October 12, 2006 1:10 AM
Subject: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments
Friends...
I send my Finale posts via an email system established by my employer
using MS Outlook Web Access.
For
At 10:40 PM 10/11/06 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
I don't see any attachment on this message that I'm replying to. The
listserv seems to have stripped it, if it was there.
I'm getting them. They're coming in as attachments with names like
msg-7775-7661.txt with the full text content of the
On 11 Oct 2006 at 22:52, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 10:40 PM 10/11/06 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
I don't see any attachment on this message that I'm replying to. The
listserv seems to have stripped it, if it was there.
I'm getting them. They're coming in as attachments with names
sending this reply, and
2. The Finale group signature.
Let's see...
Again thanks to the three of you!
Jim
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David W. Fenton
Sent: Wed 11-Oct-06 22:40
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments
On 11
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of David W. Fenton
Sent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:03
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments
On 11 Oct 2006 at 22:52, Dennis Bathory-Kitsz wrote:
At 10:40 PM 10/11/06 -0400, David W. Fenton wrote:
I don't see any attachment on this message
At 10:40 PM -0400 10/11/06, David W. Fenton wrote:
I'm not sure you have a problem, but it could be because I don't have
a signature or VCARD configured on my Outlook account. Those might be
what direct recipients are seeing, and including either of them as an
attachment is plain rude on
-Oct-06 23:22To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments
At 10:40 PM -0400 10/11/06, David W. Fenton wrote:
I'm not sure you have a problem, but it could be because I don't have
a signature or VCARD configured on my Outlook account. Those might be
what direct recipients
At 11:19 PM -0400 10/11/06, Williams, Jim wrote:
Yes, David, that's it--replies only.
A question arises, though: why are these attachments viewed by some
people as (ob)noxious? I could see an issue, perhaps, if people are
on dialup or billed by the byte, but the attachments are actually
quite
On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:19, Williams, Jim wrote:
Yes, David, that's it--replies only.
A question arises, though: why are these attachments viewed by some
people as (ob)noxious? I could see an issue, perhaps, if people are on
dialup or billed by the byte, but the attachments are actually quite
!
Jim
From: Williams, JimSent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:37To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments
Could this whole point become moot if Henry simply set things at his end to blockall attachments?
I think Chuck Israels sent a "bona fide" attachment yesterday or to
--but it SEEMS to have zapped ONE of the attachments--the repeated message. Let's see how THIS one works! Jim From: Williams, JimSent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:37To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments Could this whole point become moot if Henry simply set things at his end
On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:32, John Howell wrote:
At 11:19 PM -0400 10/11/06, Williams, Jim wrote:
Yes, David, that's it--replies only.
A question arises, though: why are these attachments viewed by some
people as (ob)noxious? I could see an issue, perhaps, if people are
on dialup or billed by the
some of you know--but itSEEMS to have zapped ONE of the attachments--the repeated message.
Let's see how THIS one works!
Jim
From: Williams, JimSent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:37To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments
Could this whole point become moot if Henry simply set
E: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments
On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:19, Williams, Jim wrote:
Yes, David, that's it--replies only.
A question arises, though: why are these attachments viewed by some
people as (ob)noxious? I could see an issue, perhaps, if people are on
dialup or billed b
On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:41, Williams, Jim wrote:
OK--it APPEARS I got rid of ONE attachment by reinstalling some kind
of S/MIME control that I had installed earlier in OWA. It doesn't say
what the control is or does--perhaps some of you know--but it SEEMS to
have zapped ONE of the
On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:37, Williams, Jim wrote:
Could this whole point become moot if Henry simply set things at his
end to block all attachments? I think Chuck Israels sent a bona fide
attachment yesterday or today, but I usually don't see that many real
attachments here, or do I just not
...
From: David W. FentonSent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:54To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: RE: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments
On 11 Oct 2006 at 23:41, Williams, Jim wrote:
OK--it APPEARS I got rid of ONE attachment by reinstalling some kind
of S/MIME control that I had installed earlier in OWA.
. I'll see if it exists on PC platform. Also...I see you have the ONE small attachment as well, the little signature of 198 bytes. JimFrom: Chuck IsraelsSent: Wed 11-Oct-06 23:49To: finale@shsu.eduSubject: Re: [Finale] Getting rid of the attachments Hi Jim, No, it wasn't an attachment t
30 matches
Mail list logo
