Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 21 Apr 2004, at 04:51 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
I beg to differ. That is not the expected behavior. Almost every OS X
application I've done updates on will leave the older version there.
???
None of Apple's apps (Safari, Mail, iTunes, iPhoto, iCal, iSync
I think we are all missing the point. B*tching about how Coda did it's
updater/upgrader doesn't really matter. Some companies make a new
version and keep the old, some don't. Does it really matter? No.
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
I am afraid you are now missing the point, I was merely refering to y
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Look:
Arkady -- who is not even a newbie -- couldn't figure out why, after
installing Finale 2004b, he kept getting the old version (Finale 2004)
when he double-clicked a Finale file. Most newbies probably wouldn't
have even noticed this, and just assumed that there w
Send you flaming emails to Makemusic.This is getting old.
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 22 Apr 2004, at 04:13 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Look:
Arkady -- who is not even a newbie -- couldn't figure out why, after
installing Finale 2004b, he kept getting the old
Yeah, either DELETE the old one, or click on a Finale document, do a
show info, and have it open all file types with the new one.
Ass. Mus. Amadeus wrote:
This is strange
I've updated Finale to 2004b (OS 10.3.3) but when I double click on a
Finale document, it'll open with the previous version
Nope
Ass. Mus. Amadeus wrote:
The *Installing older version *subject just brought me up a question:
is there anyway I can work on Finale 2004 and save a file in 2003
version?
Giovanni
I agree, the new features in Finale 2004 are great, and it is VERY
stable in OS X. I wouldn't dream of going BACK to an older version.
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
I personally would not go this route. Get the G5, if you want to avoid
Finale 2k4 for now, run 2k3 in Classic.
I also think that 2k4b is
At 02:46 PM 5/14/04 -0500, Robert Patterson wrote:
I've always thought of Redraw Interrupt as a really cool feature that
other programs should adopt. Many times I've found myself clicking
trying to abort a redraw before I remember that is (was!) an exclusive
Finale feature.
Why would you n
Use APPLY STAFF STYLE, Slash notation. You might want to check to make
sure it leaves other layers alone. Then put whatever pushes and cues you
want in another layer. Works for me.
Joel Sears wrote:
Hi All,
I am trying to write an old style Jazz big band drum part. Is there
really no way to unm
I'd go for it. I really think every update for Finale is a step forward.
I haven't had all the "issues" that people have had, like the updater
thing or the preferences thing..
Everything has been great thus far.
David McKay wrote:
After browsing tales of woe with Fin 2004, especially the Mac
I sometimes get that. Have you tried applying a FIT MUSIC to that area
before and/or after the note spacing?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was possibly covered before, so sorry if this is a duplication.
I have encountered a serious spacing problem in MacFin2004b. When
I have a meter change
On the topic of SLOW, I remember doing a compliation of patterns, like
70 pages, in 1989, on ENCORE on a Mac II. It would get slower, and
slower as the pages got added. Transposing 4 bars would take like 15
minutes..
How far we have come.
Philip Aker wrote:
I can remember trying
I had the same problem with Golden Age Font and Swing Font. I had to
convert them using Fontlab to OTF fonts. They work fine now.
Jonathan Smith wrote:
Please can anyone explain why the third party Golden Age text fonts
appear in my Finale files (Mac 2004b) without the 'spaces' between
The thing they should work on is linking parts to a score. It's a pain
in the ass to work on something, and have to remember to change the
score and other parts. It would be great to have them linked (if you
wanted) to a score, so, a change in a part would be reflected in the
score, and vice ve
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
This issue has come up before on this list, and there were a whole
bunch of things discussed that I couldn't understand because I have
little programming experience, but here is my main objection:
What would happen to the layout of the parts when you made a change to
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
I'm still not getting it. If the layout has to change, then why not
re-extract the part? If you are using Finale's default layout, then
you should be happy, as it is all done automatically. If you are in
the habit of changing the default layout on extracted parts, the
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
Once again, my little copying routine that I noted is so easy, that I
can hardly imagine justifying the kind of rewriting it would take to
accomplish linking ONLY notes in Finale. And doesn't anyone edit
anything else?
But if you find yourself doing this a LOT, would
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
At 7:50 PM -0400 6/04/04, David W. Fenton wrote:
On 4 Jun 2004 at 18:55, Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
I suppose this amounts to a different philosophy about what I want my
notation program to do.
You seem to assume a number of things:
1. layout in the linked part would
Christopher BJ Smith wrote:
You know, this is what I was referring to when I mentioned experienced
programmers seeming to see things that I don't. I don't understand the
term "relational database." Maybe if I did, I would "get" what all you
guys want out of Finale.
Relational databases. See
ht
Thank you! That is what I have been hinting at.
David W. Fenton wrote:
The key distinction between data stored in a spreadsheet and data
stored in a relational database is that the latter separates data
storage from data presentation, whereas in a spreadsheet, the place
where you store the data
Yeah, the author needs to update it for OS X. Good luck contacting him.
I sent him SEVERAL emails, and got NO REPLIES.
I ended up using a font utility called FONT LAB to convert the font to
work with OS X.
Bob Florence wrote:
Hi all;
Does anyone use the Swing font which a cousin to the Jazz fon
http://www.fontlab.com/
Bob Florence wrote:
Yeah, the author needs to update it for OS X. Good luck contacting
him. I sent him SEVERAL emails, and got NO REPLIES.
I ended up using a font utility called FONT LAB to convert the font
to work with OS X.
Hi Eric:
What is FONT LAB?
BF
__
Pity cause he makes good stuff. Great way to support your
customers...not
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Rich Sigler doesn't answer support emails, period. He never has, and
presumably never will. He obviously doesn't give a damn about his
customers once they've already bought the font.
- Darc
Honestly, I'd not recommend this at all.
Go get a cheap laser printer. A brother or something. I have a brother
1440 that is over two years old that I must have done about 20,000 pages
with, and it is a tank. The price is under $200 now. And I think it's on
it's 4th toner now?
An inkjet like th
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
While I am sure all this is correct concerning the HP All-in-ones I don't
think one can damn inkjets altogether.
I have a Canon i865, and the ink costs are probably lower than the toner
costs of my HP Laserjet, especially if I buy third party ink cartridges,
which are â 2.50
Bob Colwell wrote:
I've had an HP Gx85i for about 3 years now, and I love it. The only thing
it has not been good at is scanning -- it appears to have host driver bugs
associated with USB and Windows that they sporadically try to fix with
updates. As a printer, fax, and copier, it's been perfect.
Y
I'd totally NOT go with an inkjet all in one. The ink costs will kill you.
Consider getting a laser all in one. Such as the Brother MFC 8420
http://www.officedepot.com/ddSKU.do?level=SK&id=452368&location_info=SG_3_DV_16_SC_1601001_SK_452368
Clay Zambo wrote:
Mark Lew wrote:
In my encounters w
Nope, I don't think they have such a beast.
Brad Beyenhof wrote:
On Thursday, June 17, 2004, at 12:28 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
Clay Zambo wrote:
Mark Lew wrote:
In my encounters with HP All-in-Ones (used with a Mac), I've found
them
awkward and erratic.
I don't have room for
WOW! Those are very nice. Thanks for the link!
Rob Deemer wrote:
Apologies to touch on something that's a couple of weeks old - I just got back from some
time in Chicago without e-mail.
Some had been talking about some of the "jazz" fonts such as Jazz and Swing...I wanted to
let you know about th
Randolph Peters wrote:
I just got an email from MakeMusic that is one of those good news/bad
news kind of deals (see below). The good news is that FinMac 2004c
restores EPS export and will be available very soon to the general
public.
Woohoo!!!
The bad news is that any other fixes are to be left
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Coda *is* in effect forcing us to buy Fin2005 by saying, "Okay, we
realize that there are a lot of things that are still deeply screwed
up about FinMac2004, but we have a budget for two maintenance releases
and that's it. So after FinMac2004c (which I believe adds EPS s
David W. Fenton wrote:
But that doesn't solve the root problem, which is that I'm still stuck
with buggy software.
Rewarding them for producing buggy software is not going to get it
fixed, either.
So then what do you suggest people do? I can't say I've every had any
problems with bugs on
On 24 Jun 2004 at 20:14, Aaron Sherber wrote:
The reason I have a hard time swallowing that is that we're not
talking about just fixing 2004 -- we're talking about bugs that have
gone unfixed for *years*. If 2003 had been perfect, I would have
forgiven the flaws in 2004. But as things are, we *k
Aaron Sherber wrote:
The reason I have a hard time swallowing that is that we're not
talking about just fixing 2004 -- we're talking about bugs that have
gone unfixed for *years*. If 2003 had been perfect, I would have
forgiven the flaws in 2004. But as things are, we *keep* throwing good
mon
EXACTLY
Harold Owen wrote:
Dear folks,
While all of you fight the product, I'm blissfully enjoying working
with MacFin2004b. I'm aware of the problems, so I avoid them; but I'm
very pleased with the good new stuff, which I enjoy using. Several
composer friends of mine got easily frustrated w
David W. Fenton wrote:
It's this blind rush into the next version en masse that baffles me.
Why would people start using it in any way other than provisionally
until it has been proven reliable?
True, but I've found Finale 2004 reliable. And people generally rush to
the next version because
David W. Fenton wrote:
I don't understand why someone who is going to be collaborating with
other people would just blindly upgrade to the latest and greatest
every time it comes out. Perhaps it's testimony to the fact that Coda
has actually been pretty good about not burning people with buggy
Aaron Sherber wrote:
At 10:30 PM 06/24/2004, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
>Yeah, and name a piece of software that doesn't have bugs. And doesn't
>have bugs that have been around for a lng time?
Of the commercial software on my computer, none has bugs which are
numerous or as promi
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 24 Jun, 2004, at 11:04 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
I don't remember/know what bugs you are bitten by, but I haven't had
any with Finale...
Eric, I don't know how you got access to the top-secret special
bug-free, performance-enhanced edition of F
Aaron Sherber wrote:
Are you saying that you don't work with Finale heavily enough to
experience the bugs that have been reported, or are you saying that
you can't reproduce these bugs even when you try?
I'm saying that I haven't encountered these bugs while I've been using
Finale.
If the forme
Oh wait, accounting to Arron Sherber you probably are not using Finale
enough then. So you can't comment. HE has the final word on the topic.
I have found Finale 2004 a great tool, but then again, what do I know. I
haven't tried to recreate these "bugs", and I guess I only drive up to
Third gea
Aaron Sherber wrote:
I'm not trying to be the king of Finale, and you're welcome to say
whatever you like on this topic. My point was just that when we're
discussing the bugs in Finale, the fact that you haven't encountered
those bugs doesn't change the fact that they're still there.
But does t
Aaron Sherber wrote:
I didn't say you shouldn't -- I said there wasn't much point. When
we're talking about bugs which undoubtedly exist, and how Coda might
respond to them, I don't think it really advances the discussion for
someone to say they haven't encountered those bugs.
No, the original t
Email Makemusic/Coda support about it. I had the same problem and they
were helpful and timely in their response.
Kurt Gnos wrote:
Hi,
I have installed and registered Finale 2004 on two machines. Now I
need to move one registration because one machine will be exchanged.
How can I do thi
Really now. I had it crash once, but a bunch of other apps crashed as
well. It ended up that a fix permission task was all that was needed to
solve the problem..
I generally run Finale, Thunderbird email, Proteus, Safari, and MS Word.
I've even run Protools and MOTU Digital Performer while F
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Eric, I'm just repeating what tech support told me, which is "don't
run anything else when you're running Finale." And I fix permissions
regularly, but Finale still crashes frequently on my machine.
I'm happy Finale 2004 is working well for you, but for many of us,
the
Now, I have seen this happen before...and I'm not sure what caused
it either...
Chuck Israels wrote:
I also have had a weird situation where either the Finale icon or some
other icon will "cover" the selected tool in the tool pallet. This
seems to show up when the system is "tired." A r
Yikes, how many of these are we going to see?!?!?!
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hello,
Finale crashed again while sitting idle in the background -- and it
really *was* idle, not processing a long plugin or Mass Edit
operation. Again, it may have been getting ready to autosave,
although I couldn't
I bought and downloaded it like the first day they had it out. Very
nice. Works very well. There are a couple of little things that could be
better, like the CoreMidi support, but in all it's great to leave all
those OS 9 programs behind.
Oh, and if you use the built in sounds, you can set
USB Midi interfaces are the way to go. Either MOTUs or Midiman (I
believe they are called M-Audio now) interfaces are great. You can get
them online, or any number of places
And make sure you get the Finale 2004c updater if you don't have it.
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
So far, the help you
It's called a HUB. They are like $10. Go to some computer store (Office
Depot, Costco, CompUSA, Apple Store, etc,etc) and get one.
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
I'm running an iMac which has 2 USB ports. I will want to connect my
printer, keyboard, and MIDI device. Is there some kind of switchbox or
First, what type of G3. Does it have USB? If it doesn't, and it has a
PCI slot, I'd suggest getting a cheap (like $20) USB card from
MacSales.com, and then you have a couple of options on transferring
files. You could then get a HD that has USB and move files that way, or
you could get a CDR dr
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Hi John,
Your beige G3 can communicate quite easily with your TiBook, and the
different OS's are simply not a problem. There are any number of
options (some of which have been discussed already):
1) Connect them directly with an Ethernet crossover cable, then
connect v
Wow. Sound like you have some serious issues there. Check your fragmentation on the
hard drive. That would probably be the most likely thing that is causing this.
My lowly G4 450 cube doesn't take more than 30 seconds to load and play
something
I have updated from Finale 200
That is a great idea, both PC and Mac versions on the same CD Rom.
Tuplet improvements would be welcome..
William Roberts wrote:
According to posters on the Finale forum at finalemusic.com who've
seen the new version at recent trade shows, Finale 2005 will be
released simultaneously for Mac a
Éric Dussault wrote:
Tuplets have been cleaned up--there should be quite a bit less
tweaking needed to get them to look right. What I saw was pretty
impressived on that issue. There are new percussion sounds and a
marching percussion template that sets everything up for modern
drumline complete
Um, but why would you use EPS to create a PDF file? I'd either use the
PDF Writer in Acrobat or Adobe Distiller. The latter seems to work the
best..
On the feature list for 2005, what else is there? Tuplets fixed. Good.
Extra drum stuff. Nice, but..not really needed. Anything else?
Lots of good points. I agree, not a lot of meaningful improvements that
I can see that Finale needs. They have already started "frilling"
Finale. Saving as Audio Files, etc. etc.
I think the BIGGEST thing would be to have some sort of Part/Score
linking, as we have discussed on the list a coup
d. collins wrote:
- backwards compatibility
- good PDF files
- EPS export
Are at least three very basic things many of us desperately need (all
of which are in Sibelius, by the way). So you can imagine our
enthusiasm when we read about marching percussion templates.
I don't know what Sibelius doe
d. collins wrote:
Two different problems, although possibly (and postscriptly) related:
Finale can't produce EPS files. And the PDF files made either with
Acrobat (which should be the reference), but also Ghostscript, or any
other software I've tried look like hell: the staff lines appear to be
Hmm, I just created two PDFs with OS X's PDF ability. One with Jazz
Font, one with Maestro. The staff lines are a little strange I guess.
Sometimes they seem fuzzy. Depends on how its viewed. Zooming in clears
the problem. They print fine..
d. collins wrote:
Eric Dannewitz écrit:
I
I see the exact same problem with PDF and fuzzy lines on Sibelius PDFs I
see on the net. Perhaps the problem lies in the viewing program?
d. collins wrote:
The funny look on screen isn't funny at all, and the printing problem
has been reported to me, but perhaps by someone who was influenced by
Excellent ideas. Yeah, I totally agree. That little expression box
SUCKS. I mean, really, how hard would that be to make better? A week of
programming? And apply it to all the other boxes as well.
TGTools has some of those spacing things. The Alignment/Move tool is
something I use all the time.
yeah, I don't know. I think the problem might be more Acrobat than
Finale. I know how much people like to say it's all Finale's problem,
but I don't think so for this one..
John Bell wrote:
I used to make (Mac) Finale pdfs with Acrobat 4. They looked fine on
screen and paper. Upgrading to A
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
(1) When I open the lyric tool in MacFin 24kc, it defaults to a
given font and size (geneva 12, I think). I don't see the option of
changing either parameter, though I've looked around. Any Help?
Options->Document Settings->Fonts
(2) In my old Fin program (2001), I u
Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Thank you, I knew there had to be a way. I think it was simpler in
Fin2001
Doubt it. I think this Document Options thing is way better than it used
to be.
(2) In my old Fin program (2001), I used to print on a Apple Laser
360 with beautiful copies. On my new iMac (OS
Have you done a File Maintence thing on the file? I don't remember what
it's called in 2003, but its the menu where you can delete unused
fonts/entrees, etc.that might help
As for size, I have a finale file that is approaching 2 megs. About 200
pages of 12 systems, 4 bars each. Yeah, it
There is no task bar on the mac. If you're using OS X, it's the Dock.
Simply click and drag the icon out of the dock.
Not sure why you titled this Itunes and Josh Groban, because you don't
mention anything about iTunes in your post.
On Aug 15, 2004, at 12:54 PM, Crystal Premo wrote:
A s
More reasonable upgrade price. The Tuplet placements and repeats stuff
might be all I'd use in the new upgrade..
There is a LOT of fluff in this new version.
Brad Beyenhof wrote:
http://www.finalemusic.com/finale/features/new/
A few of the new features are marketing fluff, but some of the
Indeed, but the "Fluff level" is pretty extreme this time. Lanch menu?
Performance Assessment? Now isn't the latter starting to blur with
SmartMusic? I like that you can save Finale pieces to SmartMusic,
but.having Finale now acts a scaled down SmartMusic thing is getting
a little too fluff
I'd take it to someone higher. I was able to get $20 off the Finale OSX
update after complaining about it to the head of sales
Martin Banner wrote:
I just called Coda/Make Music, and am none too happy. I just purchased
Finale 2004c this past June, having put off my purchase as long as I
So why is this list getting these messages?!?!?!
Crystal Premo wrote:
I'm in the opera world, and the opera snobs get all bent out of shape
when Groban is marketed as "classical" or, worse, "operatic", which he
surely isn't.
I think the fact that he is sort of out of place in time is
interestin
Yes, a G4 dual core would be very nice to have.
I think the big issue with a G5 and laptops is the heat issue...
Darcy James Argue wrote:
That's the first suggestion I've heard that there may actually be one
more PowerBook G4 revision before the PowerBook G5 is introduced,
after all. (Al
Totally agree with you. I looked at that tuplet bug, and I agree it is
there, but I don't really see it causing me issues, and if they fix it,
great. Otherwise, Finale 2004 has been great, and looking forward to 2005.
Noel Stoutenburg wrote:
Friends:
In my opinion, the negativism displayed relat
You didn't say exactly what kind of Mac you have. I'd assume its some
sort of G4, perhaps a Quicksilver or something?
A couple of things to try to get your Mac faster.
1. RAM. Max it out. It totally helps everything out.
2. Faster HD, a 7200 RPM.
3. Defragment your hard drive with something like
Have you tried to install the Font using OS X 10.3s Font Book application?
I had a problem with the Golden Age Font, and Font Book opened and
installed the font fine for more under OS X.
Andrew Stiller wrote:
Look, this is getting serious. Many, perhaps most, of my fonts do not
display properly
http://www.osxfaq.com/tips/ram/index.ws
Seems like a good idea, however, maxing out the RAM in a system would be
best. If you are running OS X on 256 Megs of RAM, things can become
slow, so a redraw might take more time than it needs to.
Robert Patterson wrote:
But presumably Finale would run mu
Um, thats not true. Adobe, Microsoft, almost everything I can think of
uses temp fileshence the name, temporary files..
Darcy James Argue wrote:
So, no RAM disk in 10.3 and up. Maybe Coda can be persuaded to just
store the damn temp files in memory, already, like every other modern
On the subject of Optimizing OS X, some people say if you dedicate a
partition for OS X swap it is supposed to speed things up as well. UFS
formatted partition.
http://www.bombich.com/mactips/swap.html
Then when/if the mac needs to go to virtual memory, it doesn't have to
use the main (and perh
Darcy James Argue wrote:
1) Remove all of the troublesome fonts from Macintosh HD/System/Library.
There are also fonts in /Users/YOURUSERNAME/Library/Fonts as well. Might
want to check in there too for problem fonts.and move them out.
___
Finale mai
You know, I read an article about comparing NTFS (windows file format)
and HFS+ (OS X format).
Disk Caching is important, but there are other things to consider as
well. Fragmentation is a big issue. I know my Windows XP machine has to
get defragmented every couple of days, but it is not an issu
David W. Fenton wrote:
I'm confused: you seem to be saying OS X has disk caching but doesn't
use it.
Am I misunderstanding?
If not, I can't make sense of such a situation.
No no, I'm saying that they both do, but whether or not it is going to
make a huge difference with Finale I would say pro
David W. Fenton wrote:
. . . Fragmentation is a big issue. . . .
Not even close to being as important as disk caching, since it only
matters on initial read of the file, and really only matters with
large files.
. . . I know my
Windows XP machine has to get defragmented every couple of days
David W. Fenton wrote:
You have something wrong with your machine that is not common on
other machines. At least, I've never seen anything like what you
describe. Ever. On literally dozens of machines that I'm responsible
for.
Funny, I see it all the time. And I see a improvements after
defr
Is there a way to automatically have Finale 2005 make existing Tuplets,
Enhanced Tuplets?
Couple of other things I noticed is that none of my program settings
were transfered over. Like the location of Saved files, backsups,
etc.
___
Finale ma
Um, this was on my Macintosh. I put it in a new Finale 2005 folder.
It's not a huge deal, just kind of annoyingI'll try doing that
.ini file thing on my Windows machine later..
dhbailey wrote:
1) are you on Windows or Mac?
2) did you install over your old Finale2004 installation o
You da man!
Allen Fisher wrote:
Eric--
Mass Edit
Select All
MassEdit-->Change-->Tuplets
The 2k5 defaults are:
Placement: Stem/Beam Side
Enhanced Tuplets: Checked
Avoid Staff: Checked
Never Bracket Beamed Notes on Beam Side
Positioning
Tuplet H: 0 V: 24 EVPU
Shape H: 0 V: 0
Maximum Slope: 10 degrees
Actually, the READ ME 2005 files says how to transfer preferences on mac
on page 2...
JD wrote:
Since you're on a Mac, you much Save Special/Save Preferences in order for
changes to take effect. At least on 2004 and earlier. It may be different
on 2005, but it's worth a look.
Finale.i
So is this a Finale problem or a Windows XP Service Pack 2 problem? Did
you try 2004 with it?
I've heard Service Pack 2 breaks a lot of software, so, I'll pass on it
now. I don't think you should be pointing fingers at MakeMusic. Direct
it at Microsoft.
Henry Howey wrote:
I just put the SERVIC
I have a interesting thing happening with a Finale Score. On page 11, I
have a strange yellow box with a white little tab on it. I cannot select
it. I cannot delete it. It seems to be messing up parts extractions as well.
Anyone have an idea what this is and how to get rid of it? I did a check
Speed isn't everything. If you are getting a new system, things will run
fast regardless of a program running on Windows or Mac. I use Finale on
both. I'd say the Mac setup gives me less headaches. And OS X's
interface somehow makes Finale more enjoyable to use.
I guess it comes down to how goo
There is a folder in your Finale folder call Font Annotations
And go to Program Options, Folders to make sure Finale is looking for
them in the right spot. I'm assuming you transfered everything
(Annotations as well) to your Barbie Oven
shirling & neueweise wrote:
every time i try to fin
Totally agree with your statements!
I'm not a professional engraver, but I readily dish out the money for
updates. It is worth it to me. The time saved, the quality of the
output, etc etc.
The copy protection policy is fine for me. Compared to some of the other
copy protection systems employ
Of course since Steve Jobs ran his whole presentation on an OS X Intel
box, and ran iPhoto, Safari, etc, etc, plus Adobe and other apps.
They are going to do the Fat binary thing again. I don't think it will
be a problem as long as developers have been using the right tools.
Hello Coda
Its good. As long as Apple uses its own board designs. That is the good
part of Apple, the tight fit of hardware and software.
Apple designed boards, and Intel chips. It will be a good thing.
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Doubt it or not, apparently it already is, on a Pentium 4, while Jobs
was giv
Well, hopefully, MakeMusic has learned from their previous blunders, and
has written Finale in something that would be easily ported
A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Darwin runs on x86 from day one. Cocoa apps might be easily
recompiled. The fact even MS game box as well as major game industry
u
You have been misinformed.
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/5534/
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/5393/
http://macdailynews.com/index.php/weblog/comments/5371/
Ken Durling wrote:
I've always been told that the reason Macs don't get viruses is that
the vastly
Pages, part of iWork. Great word processing program.
ThomaStudios wrote:
Once again I'd like to tap the collective wisdom here on the board.
What is everyone's recommended choice for word processing under OS X.
I would like to rid myself of Microsh*t Word 2004, which steadfastly
refuses to
Cause it doesn't run under OS X, it runs under OS 9.
David W. Fenton wrote:
If it runs on OS X, why would that be a problem?
I use Word97, myself, even though I could be running Word2K or
Word2K2, of which I have legal copies. Word97 is sufficient for my
needs.
If the 3-year-old WordPerfec
Well, that too.
Darcy James Argue wrote:
Also because it's a dead end -- no longer supported or updated.
- Darcy
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
http://lists.shsu.edu/mailman/listinfo/finale
1 - 100 of 1467 matches
Mail list logo
