A scratch staff is a staff just the same, and perhaps one of the MIDI
channels assigned to 1-4 also is assigned to 5. Make sure 5 has its
own MIDI channel. As for copying, make sure she looks at Items to Copy
and de-select Performance Data. I don't know (because I've never tried
it) but
Hi Jerry,
You can get Chinese text into Finale text and lyrics. But there are
extra steps involved given Finale's lack of support for Unicode. You
have to set the Finale text/lyrics to be Chinese script, not Western
script. On XP, you probably have to set Chinese in the language bar
when using
Twice now, and mass mover edit to move a selected bunch of measures
has caused the dreaded spinning beach ball, from which there is no
exit short of a force quit.
Hi Chuck
is this happening with the same selection of music? Or is it more random?
Simon Troup
Digital Music Art
Hi Simon,
It happened on two different documents. I had moved measures on them
and done a bunch of other editing work. Then another grab and put
selected measures in one system (or whatever the exact wording is)
hangs up the whole thing.
I think it's been just twice, but it may have
Hmmm .. I've used the Mass Mover to move a minimum # of mm's, like
8-10 of a single part, with no prob. Are you talking about a large
amount of music?
Dean
On Aug 8, 2005, at 3:06 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi all,
Twice now, and mass mover edit to move a selected bunch of measures
has
On Aug 8, 2005, at 3:57 PM, Dean M. Estabrook wrote:
Hmmm .. I've used the Mass Mover to move a minimum # of mm's, like
8-10 of a single part, with no prob. Are you talking about a large
amount of music?
Dean
Once a bunch (maybe a dozen or more), and once only two. It doesn't
Chuck Israels / 2005/08/08 / 06:06 PM wrote:
Twice now, and mass mover edit to move a selected bunch of measures
has caused the dreaded spinning beach ball, from which there is no
exit short of a force quit.
Just in case you had some important work that hasn't been saved, I'd
wait as long as
Hiro, if (when) it happens again, I will surely try this. I
certainly didn't wait that long - maybe two or three minutes at
most. I could even have a pleasant conversation with Margot!
Thanks,
Chuck
On Aug 8, 2005, at 4:51 PM, A-NO-NE Music wrote:
Chuck Israels / 2005/08/08 / 06:06 PM
On Aug 8, 2005, at 6:06 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi all,
Twice now, and mass mover edit to move a selected bunch of measures
has caused the dreaded spinning beach ball, from which there is no
exit short of a force quit.
A bug, for sure. It has been reported.
I agree that the fact that
I don't think so, Chris. I've done this, and I don't think they're
corrupted again so soon.
I will watch this, and do what Hiro suggests, if it happens again.
Chuck
On Aug 8, 2005, at 5:46 PM, Christopher Smith wrote:
On Aug 8, 2005, at 6:06 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi all,
Twice
Randolph Peters wrote:
I just read on the other forum that Finale 2006 is already shipping.
Now that I have your attention, I thought I'd run my question by the
list again. My question applies to Finale 2005 and 2006:
At 9:36 AM -0500 7/24/05, Randolph Peters wrote:
When you check the
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With all of the hoopla about no saxes in GPO, If I
remember correctly the
Kontakt player that will be part of Finale 2006 will
be able to load any NI
Samples. Since the sounds that ship with Sibelius
play thru their Kompakt player,
I wonder if the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
With all of the hoopla about no saxes in GPO, If I remember correctly
the Kontakt player that will be part of Finale 2006 will be able to load
any NI Samples. Since the sounds that ship with Sibelius play thru
their Kompakt player, I wonder if the Sibelius sounds
Dean M. Estabrook schrieb:
Ah, what I do is create a finale file, which then, for playback, goes
via my MIDI to my Roland J35 Keboard, thence to my stereo amp and
speaker system, whence I hear it. Sorry I didn't clarify that.
Yes, but then you are not using and cannot use the Finale
John Bell wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 03:53, dhbailey wrote:
But they list the Jazz Big Band Collection for sale (I was terribly
wrong about the price -- it's a whopping $259 dollars more, and that's
a special deal for Finale users!) so they could include a tickler
about how they'll be
dhbailey schrieb:
If you want to use it for additional midi channels, you can send 16
channels to your Roland via your midi hookup and send 16 more channels
through the smartmusic soundfont (you select that in the midi devices
list) and then send the line-out jack to a mixer to combine
dhbailey wrote:
[snip]
All MakeMusic has to do is to release Fianle2006 as they plan to,
without the saxes, since they're not ready for release yet, and then
release an update patch, like they do for the occasional interim
bug-release (finale2005a, finale2005b, finale2005c, whatever),
dhbailey wrote:
dhbailey wrote:
[snip]
All MakeMusic has to do is to release Fianle2006 as they plan to,
without the saxes, since they're not ready for release yet, and then
release an update patch, like they do for the occasional interim
bug-release (finale2005a, finale2005b,
On 15 Jul 2005, at 6:25 AM, dhbailey wrote:
So why isn't Finale going to include saxes?
David, no offense, but how many times do you need this explained?
Fin2k6 doesn't include any GPO saxes because at the moment, there ARE
NO GPO SAXES TO INCLUDE. The Jazz/Big Band edition of GPO is NOT
On 15 Jul 2005, at 10:41 AM, dhbailey wrote:
So much for MakeMusic's commitment to serve the educational community
-- can anybody name any major concert band or jazz band or marching
band works which don't include saxophones?
David, are you even reading Tyler's posts? He wrote:
Sibelius
*tongue in cheek* Yeah, but when it does come out, it will have all
those useful saxes like Contrabass, and C melody. Woohoo!
Darcy James Argue wrote:
David, no offense, but how many times do you need this explained?
Fin2k6 doesn't include any GPO saxes because at the moment, there ARE
NO
At 10:21 AM -0700 7/15/05, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
*tongue in cheek* Yeah, but when it does come out, it will have all
those useful saxes like Contrabass, and C melody. Woohoo!
Darcy James Argue wrote:
David, no offense, but how many times do you need this explained?
Fin2k6 doesn't include
On 15 Jul 2005, at 1:37 PM, John Howell wrote:
Umm, am I the only one to whom it has occurred that at the very least,
alto and tenor sax are ORCHESTRAL INSTRUMENTS, and are played with a
sound the is quite different from a jazz sound? As are the saxes in
wind ensembles. Thinking that a
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 10:41 AM, dhbailey wrote:
So much for MakeMusic's commitment to serve the educational community
-- can anybody name any major concert band or jazz band or marching
band works which don't include saxophones?
David, are you even reading Tyler's
Darcy James Argue wrote:
[snip] You then went on to pooh-pooh the fact that the included snare
drum has
both left- and right-hand hits, which is actually *extremely important*
for marching band work.
[snip]
Are they matched grip or traditional grip? That's important, too. :-)
--
David H.
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 6:25 AM, dhbailey wrote:
So why isn't Finale going to include saxes?
David, no offense, but how many times do you need this explained?
Fin2k6 doesn't include any GPO saxes because at the moment, there ARE NO
GPO SAXES TO INCLUDE. The Jazz/Big
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 1:37 PM, John Howell wrote:
Umm, am I the only one to whom it has occurred that at the very least,
alto and tenor sax are ORCHESTRAL INSTRUMENTS, and are played with a
sound the is quite different from a jazz sound? As are the saxes in
wind
On 15 Jul 2005, at 2:32 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Your point being? Yes they do include those instruments. but if the
playback can't include the sax section, how will a reasonable
rendition of a band work be made?
(A) With other instruments covering the saxophone parts, same as what I
do know
n 15 Jul 2005, at 2:43 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 1:37 PM, John Howell wrote:
Umm, am I the only one to whom it has occurred that at the very
least, alto and tenor sax are ORCHESTRAL INSTRUMENTS, and are played
with a sound the is quite different from a
Darcy James Argue wrote:
[snip]
No, you cannot. Sibelius does not provide their own soundfont -- Finale
does (in addition to the GPO sounds).
I haven't used the Finale-provided soundfont other than to check my
installation -- then I substitute one which I prefer for the
Finale-provided
--- Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 2:32 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Your point being? Yes they do include those
instruments. but if the
playback can't include the sax section, how will a
reasonable
rendition of a band work be made?
(A) With other
On 15 Jul 2005, at 3:27 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Darcy James Argue wrote:
What's better, a Finale+GPO rendition of a concert band work that
contains every concert band instrument except saxophones
(substituting clarinets or double-reeds on their parts, as I do now),
or a Sibelius rendition of
On 15 Jul 2005 at 13:03, Darcy James Argue wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 6:25 AM, dhbailey wrote:
So why isn't Finale going to include saxes?
David, no offense, but how many times do you need this explained?
Fin2k6 doesn't include any GPO saxes because at the moment, there ARE
NO GPO SAXES
--- Darcy James Argue [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 15 Jul 2005, at 2:32 PM, dhbailey wrote:
Your point being? Yes they do include those
instruments. but if the
playback can't include the sax section, how will a
reasonable
rendition of a band work be made?
(A) With other
On 15 Jul 2005 at 13:37, John Howell wrote:
At 10:21 AM -0700 7/15/05, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
*tongue in cheek* Yeah, but when it does come out, it will have all
those useful saxes like Contrabass, and C melody. Woohoo!
Darcy James Argue wrote:
David, no offense, but how many times do
Tyler Turner wrote:
[snip]
You're reading too much into Phil's response. The guy
apparently screwed up and didn't really understand
your question. With each new release, the support
starts getting mauled with more questions, and it
wouldn't surprise me if he's been working a lot of
overtime
Darcy James Argue wrote:
[snip]
Now, imagine sending a recording of a work you want published or
performed to a potential publisher or director and having to explain
that due to software limitations, the recording only includes 8
simultaneous instruments!
I wouldn't do that, either. :-)
On Jul 15, 2005, at 12:27 PM, dhbailey wrote:Neither is better in my estimation -- imagine sending a recording of a work you want published or performed to a potential publisher or director and having to explain that it's not actually a realistic sound becaue those extra clarinet or bassoon sounds
ok, I think I'm beginning to get the picture, though my inexperience in
this area blurs the concept considerably. For example, if I were to
purchase GPO, and create a fin file, I don't even understand how those
wonderful GPO sounds would become my mode of playback, with my present
system.
Being a sax player myself, I find this thread well, amusing. But seriously, there's not much out there in any sample library that comes even close to covering saxophones. The Vienna Library saxes ($265 at Sweetwater) have only tenor and soprano--no alto or bari even. Forget C-melody, bass,
On 15 Jul 2005, at 6:11 PM, Lon Price wrote:
Being a sax player myself, I find this thread well, amusing. But
seriously, there's not much out there in any sample library that
comes even close to covering saxophones. The Vienna Library saxes
($265 at Sweetwater) have only tenor and
On Jul 15, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:You have to suspend disbelief in order to accept any of these sounds. They only remotely resemble the sound of the instruments they represent. I'd like saxophones too, but when they come, they won't sound real anyway. For me, it's not that much
On Jul 15, 2005, at 3:18 PM, Darcy James Argue wrote:Lon, GPO Jazz/Big Band will have the full range of saxophones, from sopranino through sub-contrabass, and including C-melody and mezzo-soprano saxes. (Personally, I think that's overkill, but this sounds like something you'd want to pick up.)
--- Lon Price [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Jul 15, 2005, at 2:07 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
You have to suspend disbelief in order to accept
any of these
sounds. They only remotely resemble the sound of
the instruments
they represent. I'd like saxophones too, but when
they
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Not to take anyone's illusions away, but I have just been trying to make
the full GPO imitate a string quartet. To be honest, the only instrument
that is sort of acceptable is the cello, in some registers at least.
None of the violins sound remotely like solo violins
Tyler Turner wrote:
[snip]
I'm discovering that scores which have a lot of
markings for HP to interpret can sound better than a
lot of the scores I hear on the GPO demo page - and
that's using the Finale GPO set that comes with
Finale.
Do you HAVE to use HP? Nope. It's all MIDI data that
Finale
Tyler Turner wrote:
[snip]
For most of the instruments, you get a single solo
instrument and 3 ensemble instruments.
Thanks for adding that -- after reading Ronald's post I was feeling a
bit let-down.
I am intrigued now!
--
David H. Bailey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ronan wrote:
[snip]
I understand that will not be able to use the full GPO with Finale2006
immediately. But Gary has promised a free patch will be out soon.
[snip]
That's interesting, especially in light of the fact that they are
offering extra-cost addon GPO versions for Finale users to
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Tyler Turner schrieb:
Sections
strings are solid, but I'm not sure about how well the
solo strings can stand on their own or in small
ensembles (string quartets, etc.).
Not to take anyone's illusions away, but I have just been trying to make
the full GPO imitate a
Lee Actor wrote:
Thanks, this is very helpful. It's hard to tell what's missing just from
the list of patch names, e.g., Viola Section is included with Finale, but
Viola Section (10 players) is only in the full GPO. Also, no Violin II
section in either?
[snip]
Oh, no! No violin II
On Jul 14, 2005, at 5:38 AM, dhbailey wrote:
Well, let me qualify that -- the sounds are unsatisfying, even if not
having to deal with all the egos and attitude problems often present
in human orchestras makes working at my computer that much more
enjoyable! ;-)
Heh, heh! Have you read
I talked with a rep at MakeMusic yesterday about the absence of saxophones in the GPO set that come with 2006. There will be none in the full version of GPO either, for saxophones one must purchase the jazz GPO package. Can this be a blessing in disguise?John WymanI have just one question
How does one access the smartmusic soundfount for playback (not through
the internal speaker) with Mac Fin 04c?
Dean
On Jul 14, 2005, at 2:31 AM, dhbailey wrote:
ronan wrote:
Oh well. At least Tyler's review in another post leaves me hopeful
that playback in Fin2006 using GPO will be at
://www.RonaldJBrown.com
-Original Message-
From: dhbailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 14, 2005 5:32 AM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO
Tyler Turner wrote:
[snip]
For most of the instruments, you get a single solo
instrument and 3 ensemble instruments
Dean M. Estabrook schrieb:
How does one access the smartmusic soundfount for playback (not through
the internal speaker) with Mac Fin 04c?
Not sure how you mean. Where would the sound come out if not the
internal speaker?
Johannes
--
http://www.musikmanufaktur.com
John Wyman wrote:
I talked with a rep at MakeMusic yesterday about the absence of
saxophones in the GPO set that come with 2006. There will be none in the
full version of GPO either, for saxophones one must purchase the jazz
GPO package.
Can this be a blessing in disguise?
Oh,
Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Dean M. Estabrook schrieb:
How does one access the smartmusic soundfount for playback (not
through the internal speaker) with Mac Fin 04c?
Not sure how you mean. Where would the sound come out if not the
internal speaker?
Johannes
The line-out jack.
--
David
On 14 Jul 2005, at 10:04 PM, dhbailey wrote:
John Wyman wrote:
I talked with a rep at MakeMusic yesterday about the absence of
saxophones in the GPO set that come with 2006. There will be none in
the full version of GPO either, for saxophones one must purchase the
jazz GPO package. Can this
On 15 Jul 2005, at 03:04, dhbailey wrote:Oh, definitely for me! I relish the thought of having to pay another $150 or so to get the sounds of an instrument which it is unthinkable to leave out of a quite large share of the composition/engraving field, namely Concert Band, to say nothing about
--- dhbailey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
John Wyman wrote:
I talked with a rep at MakeMusic yesterday about
the absence of
saxophones in the GPO set that come with 2006.
There will be none in the
full version of GPO either, for saxophones one
must purchase the jazz
GPO package.
On 15 Jul 2005, at 03:53, dhbailey wrote:But they list the Jazz Big Band Collection for sale (I was terribly wrong about the price -- it's a whopping $259 dollars more, and that's a special deal for Finale users!) so they could include a tickler about how they'll be releasing an update patch of
Ah, what I do is create a finale file, which then, for playback,
goes via my MIDI to my Roland J35 Keboard, thence to my stereo amp and
speaker system, whence I hear it. Sorry I didn't clarify that.
Dean
On Jul 14, 2005, at 11:44 AM, Johannes Gebauer wrote:
Dean M. Estabrook schrieb:
--- Lee Actor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone who is currently using GPO with Finale
2005 tell me how useful
from a practical standpoint the subset of GPO that
is shipping with Finale
2006 is compared to the full version? In other
words, how much do you
depend on the patches not
Hi Lee,
I am currently using the full GPO with Finale 2004--and I can't wait for
Finale 2006. As I understand it, about 100 GPO instruments are included with
F2006--and that means, to me, that they can be loaded directly from Finale.
It seems that the GPO instruments missing from the cut down
--- ronan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Lee,
I am currently using the full GPO with Finale
2004--and I can't wait for
Finale 2006. As I understand it, about 100 GPO
instruments are included with
F2006--and that means, to me, that they can be
loaded directly from Finale.
It seems that
Tyler Turner schrieb:
Sections
strings are solid, but I'm not sure about how well the
solo strings can stand on their own or in small
ensembles (string quartets, etc.).
Not to take anyone's illusions away, but I have just been trying to make
the full GPO imitate a string quartet. To be
Turner
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 2:17 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] 2006/GPO
--- Lee Actor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can anyone who is currently using GPO with Finale
2005 tell me how useful
from a practical standpoint the subset of GPO that
is shipping with Finale
I really hoped Finale would get professional again and fix the EPS support
after about 10 years...:-(
I ordered it believing this would happen, but I guess I will have to switch
to Sibelius finally... (They got it to work, so they really must be the
better programmers). Sh*t! I NEED EPS
Wouldn't you think that fixes would come before
features in a development
cycle?
Existing bugs, new bugs and new features are all
addressed concurrently during the development cycle.
When they start developing new features in an existing
area of the program, they are often pulling open old
Well, this is all speculation on my part, of course. But, first, I am
talking about EPS not PDF. I can make PDFs.
Even if a Microsoft competitor to EPS were only as successful as WMA vs. MP3
that would be fine with me. After all, I can make a WMA and send it to just
about anyone in the world and
Richard Yates wrote:
Well, this is all speculation on my part, of course. But, first, I am
talking about EPS not PDF. I can make PDFs.
Even if a Microsoft competitor to EPS were only as successful as WMA vs. MP3
that would be fine with me. After all, I can make a WMA and send it to just
about
At 10:58 AM 06/25/2005, dhbailey wrote:
Garritan Personal Orchestra is supported, but only in WindowsXP (plus
Mac, of course).
I'd love to know why this supported in XP but not 2000.
Aaron.
___
Finale mailing list
Finale@shsu.edu
Richard Yates wrote:
We do not have the list of fixed issues yet, as the program is not yet
finished. That list will not be available until the program is shipping.
Wouldn't you think that fixes would come before features in a development
cycle?
Not necessarily. Program code isn't a huge
At 6/23/2005 08:33 PM, Richard Yates wrote:
We do not have the list of fixed issues yet, as the program is not yet
finished. That list will not be available until the program is shipping.
Wouldn't you think that fixes would come before features in a development
cycle?
No, because adding new
On 24 Jun 2005 at 14:23, d. collins wrote:
dhbailey écrit:
And then there are the long-standing issues such as EPS export on the
Windows side of things. If the developers haven't been able to fix
it in the previous how many versions, what makes you think they've
learned how for this
Regarding EPS, my hope is that when they're tearing
things apart to get ready for Longhorn that this will
be something that needs to get addressed. It's
probably going to be a nightmarish year for them with
two large platform changes arriving (Longhorn and Mac
Intel), and there might be some deep
On 24 Jun 2005 at 11:31, Tyler Turner wrote:
Regarding EPS, my hope is that when they're tearing
things apart to get ready for Longhorn that this will
be something that needs to get addressed. It's
probably going to be a nightmarish year for them with
two large platform changes arriving
--- David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Longhorn is *not* going to make their lives simpler,
because MS is
implementing a competitor to PDF in Longhorn, and
perhaps this new
standard will go beyond that towards doing what EPS
does. MM is going
to have to decide if they will
On 24 Jun 2005 at 13:10, Tyler Turner wrote:
--- David W. Fenton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Longhorn is *not* going to make their lives simpler,
because MS is
implementing a competitor to PDF in Longhorn, and
perhaps this new
standard will go beyond that towards doing what EPS
does.
I'm actually kind of skeptical about that. I think that PDF is too
well-established as a universal standard at this point. I think MS's
attempt to impose their own proprietary alternative to PDF will go
about as well as their attempt to impose WMA as an alternative to MP3
(i.e., not a
In a message dated 6/23/05 12:41:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does "Embeded Fonts" mean that when you send Finale files, all fonts
that are in them will print correctly, whether or not they are
installed in the system of the recipient of the files
Chuck - I believe it refers to
On Jun 23, 2005, at 11:01 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: In a message dated 6/23/05 12:41:59 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Does "Embeded Fonts" mean that when you send Finale files, all fonts that are in them will print correctly, whether or not they are installed in the system of the recipient
On Jun 22, 2005, at 5:50 PM, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
the addition of better sounds will be nice. Though I just bought the
whole GPO through their group buy :-/
An overall MIDI question I've had for years: If I have a snazzy set of
sounds on my computer, create a MIDI file with them, and
I just looked a little more carefully at the 2006 enhancements and
found one thing that will be useful to me: Smart Line libraries.
For example, Bill Duncan has created some particularly useful Smart
Shape devices that include more elements than Finale has in its
libraries, like an 8va
Not sure about the question: in the first place a MIDI file isn't made
from sounds it' s just computer code.
However, you could create a MIDI file which triggers your snazzy sounds and
record the end product as a WAV or MP3 file, and post THAT and everyone
would hear what you hear.
Or am I
Hi Andrew,
MIDI files contain no audio data. They play back using whatever MIDI
instruments the person playing back the file happens to have on their
computer (or sound card). It's a like a player piano roll -- it plays
back using the sound of whatever player piano you feed it through.
If
on 6/23/05 1:48 PM, Chuck Israels at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just looked a little more carefully at the 2006 enhancements and
found one thing that will be useful to me: Smart Line libraries.
For example, Bill Duncan has created some particularly useful Smart
Shape devices that include
: Thursday, June 23, 2005 08:06 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] 2006 a closer look
on 6/23/05 1:48 PM, Chuck Israels at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just looked a little more carefully at the 2006 enhancements and
found one thing that will be useful to me: Smart Line libraries
at least, in versions of Finale
all the way back to Fin2000.
-Original Message-
From: Don Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 08:06 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] 2006 a closer look
on 6/23/05 1:48 PM, Chuck Israels at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
So what is custom line? (I thought it too meant custom smart shape.)
-Original Message-
From: Darcy James Argue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 08:57 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Finale] 2006 a closer look
No. Smart line = custom
.)
-Original Message-
From: Darcy James Argue [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 08:57 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Finale] 2006 a closer look
No. Smart line = custom smart shape.
- Darcy
-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Brooklyn, NY
On 23 Jun
libraries for a couple of years at least, in versions of Finale
all the way back to Fin2000.
-Original Message-
From: Don Hart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 23, 2005 08:06 PM
To: finale@shsu.edu
Subject: Re: [Finale] 2006 a closer look
on 6/23/05 1:48 PM, Chuck
Robert Patterson wrote:
This issue of long-standing bugs being fixed points up a feature
listed on the website that greets me with dismay. That is the Studio
View Powerful Mixer feature. Some on this list are already
salivating at the thought, but for all its possible value, I believe
it is a
Matthew Hindson Fastmail Account wrote:
Maybe, but on the other hand, the current situation in which we have
little control over the levels of the internal sounds is just plain
unacceptable.
My lament is that they have expanded Finale's scope: not that they have
improved playback. I
We do not have the list of fixed issues yet, as the program is not yet
finished. That list will not be available until the program is shipping.
Wouldn't you think that fixes would come before features in a development
cycle?
Richard Yates
___
An overall MIDI question I've had for years: If I have a snazzy set of
sounds on my computer, create a MIDI file with them, and post it to the
internet, will someone listening to that file over the internet hear
the same sounds, or just whatever MIDI sounds their own computer has?
The
A MIDI file is kind of like a score, really, which needs performers to
make it audible - put the same string quartet parts in front of a middle
school group and the Emerson Quartet and you're going to have two very
different performances!
Ken
An overall MIDI question I've had for years:
No. I have not seen nor heard anything. Where did you get this info??
Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi folks,
Am I the only one who has seen the announcement of Finale 2006?
There's usually a lot of discussion when these things are announced,
and there seem to be some significant improvements
Some info here:
http://www.finalemusic.com/finale/
Fiedler
Habsburger Verlag Frankfurt (Dr. Fiedler)
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On 22.06.2005, at 21:34, Eric Dannewitz wrote:
No. I have not seen nor heard
On Jun 22, 2005, at 3:28 PM, Chuck Israels wrote:
Hi folks,
Am I the only one who has seen the announcement of Finale 2006?
There's usually a lot of discussion when these things are announced,
and there seem to be some significant improvements (along with the
usual bells and whistles),
1 - 100 of 111 matches
Mail list logo
