Re: [Fink-devel] pil-systempython27-1.1.7-7 build failure

2016-10-04 Thread Martin Costabel
On 4/10/16 17:01, Jack Howarth wrote: > Daniel, > I am seeing the following build failure in > pil-systempython27-1.1.7-7 on darwin15 > > cc -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -dynamic -g -Os -pipe -fno-common > -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -DENABLE_DTRACE -DMACOSX -DNDEBUG -Wall >

Re: [Fink-devel] fix for remaining fink make failures on 10.11

2015-10-24 Thread Martin Costabel
On 24/10/15 08:22, Jack Howarth wrote: [] >Since we don't want to remove the CoreFoundation support from > libgettext8-shlibs and gettext-tools, the obvious solution is to use the > proposed make-4.1-4 packaging > > https://sourceforge.net/p/fink/package-submissions/4563/ > > which

[Fink-devel] java16 on El Capitan

2015-10-03 Thread Martin Costabel
(See my response the message "Can't build virtuoso under El Capitan" on fink-beginners) If one installs Apple's JavaForOSX2015-001 package on OSX 10.11, it places the JavaVirtualMachines directory into /Library/Java and not into /System/Library/Java as it did on previous systems (for the same

Re: [Fink-devel] make-4.1-3 with make-default split-off

2015-09-16 Thread Martin Costabel
On 16/09/15 11:43, Max Horn wrote: [] > I am not 100% comfortable with changing the behavior of the make > package like this -- people who are relying on "GNU make" will be caught > by surprise if the "make" package suddenly does not provide gmake under > the name "make" anymore. Also, packages

Re: [Fink-devel] make-4.1-3 with make-default split-off

2015-09-15 Thread Martin Costabel
On 15/09/15 14:50, Jack Howarth wrote: > Martin, >In libcurl4, the error always occurs in make install as... > > Makefile:481: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed [...] I don't have 10.11 yet, so I cannot look myself, but I still think there must have been an error just before this

Re: [Fink-devel] lcms2_2.7-1

2015-04-06 Thread Martin Costabel
On 6/04/15 19:17, Jack Howarth wrote: Martin, Upstream has a new minor release of lcms2. Can we update the fink lcms2 packaging with... Done. Thanks. -- Martin -- BPM Camp - Free Virtual Workshop May 6th at

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-beginners] configure error openmotif4 after Yosemite update

2015-03-02 Thread Martin Costabel
On 2/03/15 18:33, Alexander Hansen wrote: [] Moving this over to -devel since my comments are going to exceed the scope of -beginners. Individual packages set up their own X11 build setups. Openmotif4 specifically asks for /usr/X11R6 in its ConfigureParams. I have a hard time with the

Re: [Fink-devel] TeXLive has corrupt deb?

2015-01-17 Thread Martin Costabel
On 17/01/15 06:11, Scott Hannahs wrote: OK, that makes sense, but what is up with fink not recognizing the no-use-binary option? If I run fink —-no-use-binary-dist install texlive-texmf I get the standard fink usage message. % fink —-no-use-binary-dist install texlive-texmf Fink 0.38.3

Re: [Fink-devel] xvfb-run oddity

2014-11-18 Thread Martin Costabel
On 18/11/14 14:05, Jack Howarth wrote: Daniel, I have also reproduced this failure to start Xquartz via xvfb-run on 10.8 after a fresh reboot against Xquartz 2.7.8 beta1. So i don't believe the OS release has anything to do with the bug. I am not sure I understand completely what

Re: [Fink-devel] C++ help for a build

2014-10-05 Thread Martin Costabel
On 5/10/14 02:07, Alexander Hansen wrote: Hi. I just discovered that Octave-3.6.4 has decided it doesn't want to build with clang-6: [] error: call to '__test' is ambiguous Over at macports https://trac.macports.org/ticket/45011, they concluded that this is a clang bug. They filed a

[Fink-devel] qt5-mac-qtbase-5.3.2-1 failed on 10.9

2014-10-04 Thread Martin Costabel
qt5-mac-qtbase needs builddeps on fontconfig2-dev and freetype219. Otherwise building fails with : Scanning binaries for incorrect dyld linking... Please fix build process to get consistent use of fink's libraries. ./config.tests/unix/fontconfig/fontconfig uses

Re: [Fink-devel] Circular dependency for python27 on Darwin13

2014-06-11 Thread Martin Costabel
On 10/06/14 22:03, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 6/10/14, 12:10 PM, Frava wrote: [] The following package will be installed or updated: python27 The following 26 additional packages will be installed: blt-dev blt-shlibs docbook-dsssl-nwalsh docbook-dtd docbook-xsl fontconfig-config

Re: [Fink-devel] Circular dependency for python27 on Darwin13

2014-06-11 Thread Martin Costabel
On 11/06/14 15:41, TheSin wrote: aren’t these BDO? how can you dep on them then? And since you can’t dep on them how can you have a circ dep with them? --- TS http://www.southofheaven.org/ Life begins and ends with chaos, live between the chaos! On Jun 11, 2014, at 1:19 AM, Martin

Re: [Fink-devel] Undefined symbols for architecture x86_64 when updating sylpheed

2014-05-02 Thread Martin Costabel
On 2/05/14 13:23, khorto...@rogers.com wrote: I’m trying to update my sylpheed package to sylpheed 3.4.1, and I’m running into a problem with undefined symbols. This is way outside my area of expertise, so I’m hoping that someone can give me a clue. The relevant parts of the info file

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Problem with Clang on OS X

2014-03-14 Thread Martin Costabel
(cross-posting to -devel, because this needs some serious action in the fink code) On 13/03/14 19:14, Sam Seaver wrote: So, just today, I tried installing fftw via fink. I got a clang error: clang: error: unknown argument: '-fschedule-insns2'

[Fink-devel] Source field corrections (ettercap and gdal-pgsql)

2013-11-29 Thread Martin Costabel
The fink autologs mailing list has been writing the same two error messages (a dozen times) every 30 minutes for weeks: /home/f/fink/distfiles/ettercap-0.8.0.tar.gz: No such file or directory wget --no-check-certificate -U 'fink/0.36.99.git' -nv --passive-ftp -O ettercap-0.8.0.tar.gz

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Using the bindist

2013-11-26 Thread Martin Costabel
On 26/11/13 19:26, TheSin wrote: the issue was that apt was converting _ into %5f in the debarch darwin-x86_64 = darwin-x86%5f64 in the deb file name. So fink could never find it and thus thought it wasn't present. The fix for this is now in git. It works. Thanks for finding this so

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Using the bindist

2013-11-25 Thread Martin Costabel
On 25/11/13 13:27, Martin Costabel wrote: [] The result is that Fink correctly downloaded the debs from the bindist server, but then went ahead and compiled them from source anyway, without apologizing in any way. An example output is shown below. It is actually worse. In that example

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg on 10.9

2013-11-04 Thread Martin Costabel
On 4/11/13 05:03, TheSin wrote: Thought I'd post this here, this is the reply from the dpkg author that I have been trying to fix the u-a tests with. I haven't had a chance to apply and test the patch or even look at it, but I hope to do so this week. diff --git a/dpkg-deb/main.c

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg on 10.9

2013-11-01 Thread Martin Costabel
On 1/11/13 02:10, TheSin wrote: shouldn't get text have a fallback or maybe we should create one, this type of thing is going to cause issue all over, and setting it to N or not translate isn't really a good solution. Maybe get text needs to have a fallback added to it instead? I don't

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg on 10.9

2013-10-31 Thread Martin Costabel
On 29/10/13 16:31, TheSin wrote: I honestly believe we need to patch tar to have a fallback when they aren't set. All this patching everywhere could easily be fixed if we fix tar instead. Sadly I'm not well enough versed in C to do so but if someone could that would be super. I think I

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg on 10.9

2013-10-31 Thread Martin Costabel
On 31/10/13 20:25, TheSin wrote: ChangeLog:dpkg-deb: Use fd_fd_copy instead of stream_fd_copy dpkg-deb/extract.c:if (fd_fd_copy(arfd, p1[1], memberlen, err) 0) need to check err I think. Yes, I see now that this line has been fixed in new dpkg

Re: [Fink-devel] llvm-gcc42 conflicts with ccache-default

2013-10-30 Thread Martin Costabel
On 30/10/13 11:08, Remi Mommsen wrote: [] /opt/fink/bin/dpkg: error processing /opt/fink/fink/dists/stable/main/binary-darwin-x86_64/languages/llvm-gcc42_2336.11-107_darwin-x86_64.deb (--install): trying to overwrite `/opt/fink/bin/llvm-g++-4.2', which is also in package ccache-default

Re: [Fink-devel] dpkg on 10.9

2013-10-29 Thread Martin Costabel
On 28/10/13 23:17, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 10/28/13 2:58 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: I remember a discussion 2 months ago about dpkg producing en error tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors /sw/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess tar

[Fink-devel] dpkg on 10.9

2013-10-28 Thread Martin Costabel
I remember a discussion 2 months ago about dpkg producing en error tar: This does not look like a tar archive tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors /sw/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess tar returned error exit status 2 I thought this was fixed, but I am seeing it now, with dpkg-

Re: [Fink-devel] Dep lib update to h5utils

2013-08-13 Thread Martin Costabel
On 11/08/13 19:11, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Martin, Your package h5utils currently can't update to use libpng 14. The attached patch allows it to build with libpng16. It also builds with hd5.8 and libjpeg9 (though I don't see any actual use of the libjpeg9 library). Also, note

Re: [Fink-devel] lcms2-2.4-1

2013-05-27 Thread Martin Costabel
On 26/05/13 22:11, Jack Howarth wrote: Martin, The lcms2 package needs the update to 2.4 and the associated plugin threading patch from Fedora posted in http://sourceforge.net/p/fink/package-submissions/4269/ in order for ghostscript 9.07 to be buildable in the fink update at

Re: [Fink-devel] boost

2013-02-09 Thread Martin Costabel
On 9/02/13 17:22, William G. Scott wrote: Hi folks (Martin et al.): I'm trying to put together a fink package for rdkit, which is a new dependency for coot (which I maintain). rdkit requires a fairly recent version of boost. I can build it using version 1.53. Fink has 1.35, which is a

Re: [Fink-devel] octave-atlas-3.4.3-206 problems with szlib-2.1

2012-09-21 Thread Martin Costabel
On 22/09/12 04:08, Alexander Hansen wrote: On 9/21/12 5:13 PM, María Curet-Arana wrote: [] The checksum of the file is incorrect. The most likely cause for this is a corrupted or incomplete download Expected: 63894a65bc470011fd2049f3ca65d2bf Actual: MD5(902f831bcefb69c6b635374424acbead)

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.7/stable/main/finkinfo/libs boost1.35..info, 1.3, 1.4 poppler4-glib.info, 1.1, 1.2

2012-09-14 Thread Martin Costabel
On 14/09/12 15:01, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: diff -u -d -r1.1 -r1.2 --- poppler4-glib.info 8 Aug 2011 01:07:36 - 1.1 +++ poppler4-glib.info 14 Sep 2012 08:00:47 - 1.2 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ Package: poppler4-glib # NOTE: Must keep %v in sync among all

Re: [Fink-devel] update cmake to 2.8.9

2012-09-07 Thread Martin Costabel
On 7/09/12 02:53, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: Martin, Can cmake be updated to the latest 2.8.9? 2.8.8 has a bug in finding pkg-config which is fixed in 2.8.9 http://www.cmake.org/Bug/view.php?id=13125 Yes, thanks for the reminder. -- Martin

Re: [Fink-devel] system-java-dev problem on Mountain Lion

2012-08-02 Thread Martin Costabel
On 2/08/12 02:24, Alexander Hansen wrote: [] This appears to be related to https://github.com/fink/fink/issues/42 . We also had one of our maintainers mention that he does _not_ have this issue, but he may well not have done a clean install. I have 2 ML machines here, both upgraded from 10.7

[Fink-devel] imlib2 configure fails on 10.8

2012-07-30 Thread Martin Costabel
imlib2-1.4.2-5 configure fails on 10.8. The following snippet shows the failure: checking for X... libraries /usr/X11/lib, headers /usr/X11/include checking X11/X.h usability... no checking X11/X.h presence... no checking for X11/X.h... no configure: error: no X support found. Use --x-includes

Re: [Fink-devel] imlib2 configure fails on 10.8

2012-07-30 Thread Martin Costabel
On 30/07/12 20:56, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: [] Thanks for the bug report. I've just checked an update into the 10.7 tree that bumps the version to the latest imlib2-1.4.5. Hopefully this makes it work on 10.8. Yes, it does. Thanks. -- Martin

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Mountain Lion upgrade notes

2012-07-27 Thread Martin Costabel
On 27/07/12 11:02, Martin Costabel wrote: [] Apple is, as usual, very inventive with their bugs. The problem is that the OS upgrade wipes out the Fink-created users, but not the groups. Thus there remains GID 266, which fink interprets as ID 266 already in use, and it refuses to create user

Re: [Fink-devel] Validator crash

2012-07-12 Thread Martin Costabel
On 12/07/12 04:26, Martin Costabel wrote: On 12/07/12 03:36, Daniel Macks wrote: [] Is this using the released version of fink (what version?) or a pull from git master (is it up-to-date)? I committed a fix to master for a problem like this shortly before the most recent release but I'm

[Fink-devel] Validator crash

2012-07-11 Thread Martin Costabel
Trying to validate my newly created modulef deb (which installs without problem and shows no error with commands such as dpkg -c), I get costabel% fink -v check /sw/fink/debs/modulef_99-10_darwin-x86_64.deb Validating .deb file /sw/fink/debs/modulef_99-10_darwin-x86_64.deb... tar:

Re: [Fink-devel] Validator crash

2012-07-11 Thread Martin Costabel
On 12/07/12 03:07, Martin Costabel wrote: [] tar: ./sw/share/modulef/ascii/sta/s/visu/zgparam.ins: Cannot open: Permission denied tar: Exiting with failure status due to previous errors /sw/bin/dpkg-deb: subprocess tar returned error exit status 2 Error: couldn't unpack .deb I forgot to add

Re: [Fink-devel] Validator crash

2012-07-11 Thread Martin Costabel
On 12/07/12 03:36, Daniel Macks wrote: [] Is this using the released version of fink (what version?) or a pull from git master (is it up-to-date)? I committed a fix to master for a problem like this shortly before the most recent release but I'm not sure if it got carried into the

Re: [Fink-devel] Buildworld completed for 10.7

2012-05-15 Thread Martin Costabel
On 15/05/12 01:07, Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: On 5/14/2012 6:46 PM, Charles Lepple wrote: Quick question on the /sw prefix warning - is it just a grep for /sw/? ngspice has a sw subdirectory in its source tarball, but I haven't seen any problems compiling in /sw.lion. Yes, the sw_prefix

Re: [Fink-devel] Mirror out of Sync?

2012-05-07 Thread Martin Costabel
On 7/05/12 08:52, Andreas Bießmann wrote: [] andreas@andreas-mbp % fink selfupdate rsync -az -q rsync://aah.de.eu.finkmirrors.net/finkinfo//TIMESTAMP /sw/fink/TIMESTAMP.tmp The timestamp of the server is older than what you already have. andreas@andreas-mbp % date Mo 7 Mai 2012 08:41:09

Re: [Fink-devel] python-aqua or systempython packages?

2012-04-28 Thread Martin Costabel
On 28/04/12 04:51, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: [] I like the pil approach overall. I guess my only concern is using python2.5 on all platforms, since 2.5 is pretty old. I guess that would be a good place to start, since its probably the easiest to manage. Then if we find we need to

Re: [Fink-devel] python-aqua or systempython packages?

2012-04-21 Thread Martin Costabel
On 20/04/12 23:11, Hans-Christoph Steiner wrote: Any thoughts on this? Any objections to me adding a bunch of 'systempython' packages? I'm not entirely sure how to do this right, so any ideas are helpful. I have had systempython packages for a couple of years. Here is my take on this: I

Re: [Fink-devel] no more autoconf/automake as of Xcode 4.3

2012-02-21 Thread Martin Costabel
On 20/02/12 16:45, Jack Howarth wrote: One of the MacPorts developers noticed that Xcode 4.3 no longer installs autoconf or automake packages. In my rebuilding of fink with Xcode 4.3 using a clean bootstrap of fink on a clean install of Lion/Xcode 4.3, I haven't run into any problematic

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiler mess on Lion (Was Re: libgeos problem)

2011-12-03 Thread Martin Costabel
On 2/12/11 22:04, Jack Howarth wrote: On Fri, Dec 02, 2011 at 09:59:31PM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: [] I installed llvm30 from your new package on the submission tracker. No problem installing. Unfortunately, the fatal bug is still there: Building scribus with the new clang fails exactly

Re: [Fink-devel] Compiler mess on Lion (Was Re: libgeos problem)

2011-12-02 Thread Martin Costabel
On 28/11/11 15:54, Jack Howarth wrote: On Mon, Nov 28, 2011 at 09:42:44AM +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: [] I have been trying to build the scribus package on Lion, without success: - With clang, it runs into a clang bug that was detected a year ago http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvmbugs

[Fink-devel] Compiler mess on Lion (Was Re: libgeos problem)

2011-11-28 Thread Martin Costabel
On 27/11/11 21:50, Alexander Hansen wrote: [] We should probably do an apple-gcc-4.2 package, then. It might even be handy on 10.7. If it builds on 10.7, I am all for it. I have been trying to build the scribus package on Lion, without success: - With clang, it runs into a clang bug that was

[Fink-devel] qt4.7

2011-11-25 Thread Martin Costabel
Dear Ben, can we please have 1. in 10.7: a version of qt4 that does not spit out endless streams of /sw/lib/qt4-mac/include/QtCore/qglobal.h:323:6: warning: #warning This version of Mac OS X is unsupported 2. in 10.4/stable: qt4.7, so that the move from unstable to stable can continue.

Re: [Fink-devel] boost1.46.1.cmake from tracker

2011-11-20 Thread Martin Costabel
On 20/11/11 14:42, Max Horn wrote: Am 20.11.2011 um 01:37 schrieb Alexander Hansen: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Does anybody have any objections to my adding the boost1.46.1.cmake package from

Re: [Fink-devel] boost1.46.1.cmake from tracker

2011-11-20 Thread Martin Costabel
On 20/11/11 20:23, Max Horn wrote: But I now see that you still maintain boost1.3* packages. Hum, so do you two coordinate somehow or what? In so far as the packages should be aware of each other and conflict gracefully. But the boost*cmake and the traditional boost (-bjam) projects are

Re: [Fink-devel] Version control migration?

2011-10-25 Thread Martin Costabel
On 25/10/11 05:19, Charles Lepple wrote: In light of the fink core code moving to git/GitHub, I'd like to bump this thread (git for dists/): http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.os.macosx.fink.devel/20083 For bootstrapping, is git part of the latest Xcode, or is that only on 10.7? What else is

Re: [Fink-devel] enable path-prefix-clang for SL Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread Martin Costabel
On 21/10/11 01:05, Jack Howarth wrote: [] should upgrade to this version (or revert to Xcode 3.2.6). This would allow us to focus on supporting clang in the Xcode 4.x releases and encourage unification of any clang specific changes to info files between the 10.4 and 10.6 trees. It also

Re: [Fink-devel] enable path-prefix-clang for SL Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread Martin Costabel
On 21/10/11 16:04 , Jack Howarth wrote: On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 10:06:24AM +0200, Martin Costabel wrote: On 21/10/11 01:05, Jack Howarth wrote: [] should upgrade to this version (or revert to Xcode 3.2.6). This would allow us to focus on supporting clang in the Xcode 4.x releases

Re: [Fink-devel] Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread Martin Costabel
On 21/10/11 17:05 , David R. Morrison wrote: So at the very least, we should put a news item on the fink webpage warning users that fink on 10.6 is currently incompatible with Xcode 4.2, and suggesting a downgrade to Xcode 3.2.6. We would have needed such a warning against xcode-4.0 since a

Re: [Fink-devel] enable path-prefix-clang for SL Xcode 4.2

2011-10-21 Thread Martin Costabel
On 21/10/11 21:18 , Alexander Hansen wrote: On 10/21/11 3:02 PM, Martin Costabel wrote: [] What I mean is that a package that does not compile under clang needs to include the above fix for xcode-4.2 if your automatic switch to clang is implemented. But then it will probably no longer work

Re: [Fink-devel] Move gcc46 to 10.5/stable branches ?

2011-09-16 Thread Martin Costabel
On 15/09/11 16:13, David R. Morrison wrote: [] But there are also lots of unmaintained things in unstable, many of them very old, so I think it would be dangerous to just dump everything to stable. I like Alexander's approach. Why would this be more dangerous than the current situation,

Re: [Fink-devel] gc-7-1001 and Lion

2011-09-09 Thread Martin Costabel
On 22/07/11 23:38, Jack Howarth wrote: Dave, FYI, David Fang asked me to test gc under Lion so that he can push guile20 into 10.7. Almost 2 months have passed since this request. Is there still time needed for deciding? I would like to see gc in Lion, too, for asymptote. gc-7.1-1002

[Fink-devel] Validator complains about old cruft

2011-09-07 Thread Martin Costabel
Can we please get rid of the Error: use of PatchFile requires declaring a BuildDepends on fink (= 0.24.12) or higher complaint in the validator? This should have been EOL'ed with 10.4, probably even with 10.3, because older versions of fink wouldn't run anyway, much less be able to build

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem resolving dependencies. Check for circular dependencies.

2011-07-22 Thread Martin Costabel
On 22/07/11 12:42, Jack Howarth wrote: As folks update their 10.7 trees today, we should attempt to debug the following issue which also exists in 10.4 unstable. Last night I executed... [MacPro:main/finkinfo/languages] howarth% fink -m install ghostscript [] The following 7 additional

Re: [Fink-devel] perl, python, ruby, etc.

2011-07-21 Thread Martin Costabel
On 21/07/11 20:27, David R. Morrison wrote: OK. I just did a test build of our perl5100 package and it failed, so needs work. So for now, we'll let things be, but if somebody wanted to work on perl 5.10.0 to bring it forward, they are welcome to do it. For what it's worth, Lion has

Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-27 Thread Martin Costabel
On 27/04/11 04:14, Daniel Macks wrote: [] And while implementing this, I notice it already *is* allowed. Call it a forward-looking feature or a bug in the implemenation (it's a little of both), but fact is val does allow you to use PatchScript to remove hardcoded /sw in upstream sources.

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-users] Xpdf and images

2011-04-24 Thread Martin Costabel
On 23/04/11 04:22 , Stefan Bruda wrote: [] Any LaTeX with Type 3 fonts will do. For example: \documentclass[12pt]{article} \usepackage{bbm} \begin{document} \Large $\mathbbm{N}$ \end{document} I made it \Large to make it easier on the eyes, the crux here

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-commits list is kind of working again

2011-04-23 Thread Martin Costabel
On 22/04/11 21:51, Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Daniel Macks, Peter O'Gorman, and I (albeit to a lesser degree) have worked on getting the commit messages back up today, by directly invoking sendmail rather than streaming to localhost:25. We are now

Re: [Fink-devel] fink-commits list is kind of working again

2011-04-23 Thread Martin Costabel
On 23/04/11 14:32, Alexander Hansen wrote: [] - DEFAULT $CVSROOT/CVSROOT/syncmail -u %{sVv} fink-comm...@lists.sourceforge.net + CVSROOT $CVSROOT/CVSROOT/syncmail -u %{sVv} -f users.sourceforge.net fink-comm...@lists.sourceforge.net + DEFAULT $CVSROOT/CVSROOT/syncmail -u %{sVv} -f

Re: [Fink-devel] Uniform description for obsolete packages?!

2011-04-14 Thread Martin Costabel
Max Horn wrote: [] Though I still agree that sometimes it's a bit tough to avoid the package name... OK, I can't think of a concrete example right now, but imagine you had a tool called image for image processing... using the description process alone seems a bit too minimalistic. So in the

Re: [Fink-devel] miktex-tools package

2011-03-20 Thread Martin Costabel
On 19/03/11 20:35, Sjors Gielen wrote: Op 14 mrt 2011, om 00:43 heeft Sjors Gielen het volgende geschreven: Hi Martin, Your miktex-tools package no longer works, as it has version 2.5 and communicates with an online server which no longer accepts 2.5 clients. I have therefore updated it

Re: [Fink-devel] [Fink-beginners] Circular dependency issue with libgettext3-dev and libgettext8-dev

2011-02-18 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- [] On 2/18/11 9:01 AM, Prerna Atri wrote: Hi, We tried both the suggested methods (installing libidn and updating fink) Did you update poppler4, too? The whole discussion below was about the version and dependencies of

Re: [Fink-devel] Updating camlimages

2011-02-14 Thread Martin Costabel
On 14/02/11 22:35 , Julius Canute wrote: [] There is a problem while configuring camlimages: config.status: error: cannot find input file: doc/Makefile.in inorder to resolve it i removed line 524 in configure.ac which specifies doc/Makefile and compiled manually which worked fine. But if

Re: [Fink-devel] Version control migration?

2011-02-07 Thread Martin Costabel
On 6/02/11 21:17, Alexander Hansen wrote: [] Not all users _can_ use rsync, however, due to firewalls. We need to have a selfupdate method that works over unblocked http ports (and since CVS proxy support hasn't worked in a while it would be a nice change). Even then, although svn runs over

Re: [Fink-devel] gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-5 build failure

2011-01-17 Thread Martin Costabel
On 17/01/11 01:48 , Alexander Hansen wrote: [] $ fink -V Package manager version: 0.29.99.cvs Distribution version: selfupdate-cvs Wed Jan 12 09:20:24 2011, 10.6, x86_64 [] g++ -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -I../.. -I../../tests -fexceptions - -I/sw32/include -O2 -pedantic -m64 -mtune=core2

Re: [Fink-devel] gmp5-64bit-5.0.1-5 build failure

2011-01-17 Thread Martin Costabel
On 17/01/11 12:59 , Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 1/17/11 4:34 AM, Martin Costabel wrote: On 17/01/11 01:48 , Alexander Hansen wrote: [] $ fink -V Package manager version: 0.29.99.cvs Distribution version: selfupdate-cvs Wed Jan 12 09:20:24 2011

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-15 Thread Martin Costabel
On 15/01/11 08:47 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: At Fri, 14 Jan 2011 23:48:36 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: [] So this is *again* a problem with fmtutil.cnf. Unfortunately, fmtutil does not say which file it is using. [] I do not understand why one needs several copies of fmtutil.cnf at all. I

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-14 Thread Martin Costabel
On 14/01/11 09:32 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: I imported a patch from MacPorts, which disables Carbon API. https://trac.macports.org/ticket/25316 How does it work for you? Indeed, with this, texlive rev. test10 builds OK for me on 10.6.6. The installation, however, did not succeed immediately.

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-13 Thread Martin Costabel
On 11/01/11 20:26 , Martin Costabel wrote: [] I'll go now back to 10.6/64bit and try to see how to compile xetex. It would be a pity if all texlive binaries would have to be compiled in 32bit mode just because the xetex developers haven't yet got their act together. The problem is actually

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-12 Thread Martin Costabel
On 12/01/11 06:52, Tomoaki Okayama wrote: At Tue, 11 Jan 2011 20:26:59 +0100, Martin Costabel wrote: On 11/01/11 19:50 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: [] FYI, I always succeed to build texlive with ccache-default... Yes, this is weird. I haven't really made a test series to see whether

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-11 Thread Martin Costabel
Tomoaki Okayama wrote: I've just tested texlive on 10.5/i386 and no error occurred. The log file is here (with -Kkmly --build-as-nobody option): http://fink.sodan.ecc.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~okayama/tex/fink-build-log_texlive_0.20100722-0test7_2011.01.11-19.21.35.gz Currently I couldn't figure out

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-11 Thread Martin Costabel
On 11/01/11 19:50 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: [] FYI, I always succeed to build texlive with ccache-default... Yes, this is weird. I haven't really made a test series to see whether it *always* fails with ccache-default installed. [For Install] Does the following command improve the situation?

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-10 Thread Martin Costabel
On 10/01/11 14:16 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: Dear Fink developers, We have managed to update TeX Live to the latest version (2010), and now it seems a time to test it publicly! Thanks for the hard work. If you would like to test it, checkout the finkinfos as follows: $ cvs -d

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-10 Thread Martin Costabel
On 10/01/11 14:16 , Tomoaki Okayama wrote: [] Some desirous check points: * Build/Install (of course) and Update from a current texlive I've tested only on 10.6/32bit, clean env, so I'm not sure whether it works on other env. On 10.5/i386, phase compiling: texlive-0.20100722-0test7

Re: [Fink-devel] Updater to TeX Live 2010

2011-01-10 Thread Martin Costabel
On 10/01/11 23:52 , Martin Costabel wrote: [] No patch yet, but a failure: On 10.6/64bit: [] It seems that this XeTeXLayoutInterface.cpp uses deprecated QuickDraw functions that have been removed on 10.6/64bit. There is a discussion of this from last May http://web.archiveorange.com/archive/v

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem with qt4-mac on 10.4

2010-12-21 Thread Martin Costabel
On 13/12/10 18:07 , Martin Costabel wrote: On 13/12/10 16:39, Daniel Macks wrote: I've sen a few places where 10.4's linker is a bit more anal about having dependent libs available at link-time. But it's always been because a lib somewhere in the dyld runtime loading tree was missing

[Fink-devel] Problem with qt4-mac on 10.4

2010-12-13 Thread Martin Costabel
To: Martin Costabel costa...@wanadoo.fr [] g++-4.0 -c -pipe -I/sw/lib/system-openssl/include -I/sw/lib/system-openssl/include -I/sw/lib/freetype219/include -I/sw/lib/freetype219/include/freetype2 -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include -I/sw/lib/fontconfig2/include -isystem /sw/include -isystem /usr/X11R6

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem with qt4-mac on 10.4

2010-12-13 Thread Martin Costabel
On 13/12/10 14:33, Alexander Hansen wrote: [] The really strange part is that /sw/lib/qt4-mac/lib/libQtCLucene.4.dylib is part of qt4-mac-* itself. I'll see if I can reproduce this on 10.4/powerpc. It only looks strange. The dylib is built with an install_name of

Re: [Fink-devel] Problem with qt4-mac on 10.4

2010-12-13 Thread Martin Costabel
On 13/12/10 16:39, Daniel Macks wrote: I've sen a few places where 10.4's linker is a bit more anal about having dependent libs available at link-time. But it's always been because a lib somewhere in the dyld runtime loading tree was missing a direct link against a lib it used directly. On

Re: [Fink-devel] new wine(s)

2010-12-01 Thread Martin Costabel
On 30/11/10 19:49, Max Horn wrote: [] Now, as for myself: I am going to install a modified version of the wine package, as I have done so for past versions. Specifically, I'll hack my .info file by removing all deps on arts and esound. Reason: These two dependencies alone pull in a

Re: [Fink-devel] FWD: stegdetect

2010-11-08 Thread Martin Costabel
On 8/11/10 21:03, Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Original message (sent to -core and -redirected): [] Was the following issue ever resolved? http://www.mail-archive.com/fink-devel@lists.sourceforge.net/msg18469.html Cvs log reminds me that I fixed

Re: [Fink-devel] FWD: stegdetect

2010-11-08 Thread Martin Costabel
On 8/11/10 23:25, phil hefferan wrote: [] OK thanks I will investigate unstable, I'm a new fink user. Just curious: what was broken with magic.inc and what fix did you apply? The file magic.inc is produced by make using the following code in file/Makefile: magic.inc: magic echo -n \

Re: [Fink-devel] new virtual pacakge? (was Re: [Fink-users] opensync failed again - cmake does not compile)

2010-10-25 Thread Martin Costabel
On 25/10/10 04:08, Benjamin Reed wrote: [] If people's stuff using java would builddep on system-java-dev, then we'd know whether the user had it or not. ;) But the bdep could be satisfied with an older version of system-java-dev, without fink even knowing. This might pose a problem in a

Re: [Fink-devel] Notice: Packages linking to libfluidsynth

2010-10-13 Thread Martin Costabel
On 13/10/10 02:01, Daniel Johnson wrote: [] I tried updating audacious2-plugins to use fluidsynth1 but fluidsynth1 doesn't build for me on 10.6/x86_64 because freaking cmake is a moron and puts the library into lib64 instead of lib. Have I mentioned that I hate cmake? [] -- Installing:

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: Re: [Fink-beginners] Error compiling Xmame

2010-09-03 Thread Martin Costabel
Jean-François Mertens wrote: On 01 Sep 2010, at 16:11, Alexander Hansen wrote: For context, here it is with the lines immediately before and after (I added the line numbers): 181 #ifndef HAVE_SNPRINTF 182 int snprintf(char *s, size_t maxlen, const char *fmt, ...); 183 #endif If there

Re: [Fink-devel] cmake CMAKE_FIND_FRAMEWORK changed to LAST

2010-08-24 Thread Martin Costabel
Kees Bakker wrote: On 23 Aug, 2010, at 20:00 , Martin Costabel wrote: [] Do you have a concrete example where the value LAST for CMAKE_FIND_FRAMEWORK leads to serious trouble? Yes, I have a program that I want to link against my own copy of the SDL framework. It doesn't really matter where

Re: [Fink-devel] cmake CMAKE_FIND_FRAMEWORK changed to LAST

2010-08-23 Thread Martin Costabel
Kees Bakker wrote: Hi, The cmake installation in Fink changes the default for CMAKE_FIND_FRAMEWORK from First into Last. This was a bad idea. Can we revert that change, please? I have the following reasons to ask for this revert. 1. The documentation of cmake (in the Fink

Re: [Fink-devel] [cvs] dists/10.4/unstable/main/finkinfo/text ghostscript.info, 1.18, 1.19

2010-08-20 Thread Martin Costabel
Hanspeter Niederstrasser wrote: [] How does this compare to the Submissions tracker item: http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?func=detailaid=2983521group_id=17203atid=414256 I am going blind, it seems. In my naivety, I had assumed that the SF tracker presents search results in some

Re: [Fink-devel] libpng3-1:1.2.5-2

2010-08-09 Thread Martin Costabel
John Davison wrote: [] So 1.2.5 would be valid, but 0.1.2.5 isn’t. It would seem that “/sw/src/libpng3-1.2.5-2/libpng-1.2.5/scripts/Makefile.darwin” is broken. On MacOSX 10.3 (Panther) for which the package was made, this bug did not lead to an error; it gave a compatibility version of

Re: [Fink-devel] Fwd: libpng3-1:1.2.5-2

2010-08-08 Thread Martin Costabel
David R. Morrison wrote: Has anybody seen this error before? Would have been 6 years ago :-) Begin forwarded message: *From: *John Davison jmdavi...@optonline.net mailto:jmdavi...@optonline.net *Date: *August 7, 2010 2:20:59 PM PDT *To: *dmr...@users.sourceforge.net

Re: [Fink-devel] make seg-fault in qt4-x11

2010-07-31 Thread Martin Costabel
Jean-François Mertens wrote: [] Interestingly however, objcopy is from binutils, which I installed here _ both 32 and 64 bit ! _ on april 23, i.e., between the 2 builds of qt4-x11. Not sure I had one before, or maybe it was a broken one ... Have you tried removing binutils to see whether

Re: [Fink-devel] Orphaning my packages

2010-07-07 Thread Martin Costabel
Jed Frechette wrote: Due to ever decreasing use of OS X for work and a general lack of time I have decided to orphan my Fink packages. Hopefully, someone will be interested enough to adopt a few of the packages listed below, if not, can someone change the Maintainer field to fink-devel

Re: [Fink-devel] mayavi2 fink

2010-07-07 Thread Martin Costabel
Alexander Hansen wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 6/29/10 11:40 AM, Jed Frechette wrote: On Tue, 29 Jun 2010 09:20:54 -0600, RaDaniel Christian 성준 renderea...@gmail.com wrote: I have found your fink package for MayaVi2-py25, but I can't install it. I was

Re: [Fink-devel] opengl-py broken?

2010-07-07 Thread Martin Costabel
Daniel Macks wrote: On Tue, Mar 24, 2009 at 04:53:38PM +0100, Jean-Fran?ois Mertens wrote: The new pkg wxgtk2.8-py26 has a dep on opengl-py26. Checking whether the latter did build, I got: [] /usr/libexec/gcc/powerpc-apple-darwin8/4.0.1/ld: Undefined symbols: _glCurrentPaletteMatrixARB []

Re: [Fink-devel] libjpeg-shlibs and libjpeg dependencies in your packages!

2010-06-23 Thread Martin Costabel
Koen van der Drift wrote: [] make[262]: Makefile:11: fork: Resource temporarily unavailable make[262]: vfork: Resource temporarily unavailable make[261]: *** [dirs] Error 2 The [262] tells you that there are 262 levels of make running. Either there is an infinite loop (but then this should

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >