[Fink-users] Installed, but Can't Run, Denemo

2006-01-26 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Under OS 10.3.9, I installed denemo successfully; then, using X11, I opened a terminal and got: drj2:jonathan jonathan$ denemo & [1] 19388 drj2:jonathan jonathan$ BinReloc failed to initialize: Domain: 1 (GBinReloc) Code: 4 Message: Binary relocation support is disabled. --

[Fink-users] Re: OpenOffice.org's Installing All of Its Packages Again

2005-10-29 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 10:01 PM +0900 10/28/05, ASARI Takashi wrote: Hi Jonathan, thanks for your feedback. And thank you, in turn, for a quick and informative response. Could OOo please go back to the previous behavior of installing only the wanted language packages? Maybe you mean "building only the wanted l

Re: [Fink-users] OpenOffice.org's Installing All of Its Packages Again

2005-10-29 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 7:36 PM +0100 10/28/05, Viv Kendon wrote: On my system (latest unstable and 10.4.2) OOo2.0.0-22 didn't _install_ all of the language packages, they are still all listed separately, and only the one I already had was installed. But it did _build_ the debs for them all... Previous behaviour

[Fink-users] Openoffice.org: A Further thought

2005-09-11 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Now that openoffice.org has been successfully updated on the two OS X Macs where I use it, and openoffice.org-he has been updated on one and seems headed for a successful update on the other, I suppose I should just be happy. Nevertheless, the .org update on this computer (the faster of the t

Re: [Fink-users] Re: [Fink-beginners] Problem installing hfstar

2005-09-06 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 5:35 PM -0700 9/6/05, David R. Morrison wrote: On Sep 6, 2005, at 11:26 AM, Jonathan Levi, M.D. wrote: The fink package description for GNU gettext-tools lists version 0.14.2-15 for both the 10.3 unstable tree (which I'm using) and the 10.4 unstable tree, which I presume Alexander and Holger

[Fink-users] Re: [Fink-beginners] Problem installing hfstar

2005-09-05 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 12:32 PM +0200 9/5/05, Holger Schulz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I can't install hfstar, it says gcc -g -O2 -L/sw/lib -o rmt rmt.o ../lib/libtar.a -lintl Making all in scripts make[2]: Nothing to be done for `all'. Making all in po PATH=../src:$PATH /sw/bin/xgettext --default-domain=hfstar

Re: [Fink-users] openoffice.org version mismatch?

2005-09-05 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 8:38 PM +0100 9/5/05, Viv Kendon wrote: I'm assuming (since the list has gone quiet about it) that it no longer eats inordinate amounts of disk space during the compile... I'm still using Panther, but FWIW, I just updated openoffice.org and openoffice.org-he uneventfully; the build folder,

[Fink-users] Selfupdate Problem With gettext-dev-0.10.40-24; Workaround

2005-08-20 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Attempting a selfupdate, I got (approximately) parse error, in file `/sw/var/lib/dpkg/status' near line 4695 package `libgettext3-dev': missing version failed: Can't install gettext-dev-0.10.40-24 Investigating file /sw/var/lib/dpkg/status, I found that line 4695 was blank, and was pr

[Fink-users] SUCCESS Installing Openoffice.org, Openoffice.org-he (10.3)

2005-08-09 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
drj2:jonathan jonathan$ fink list -i openoffice ... i openoffice.org 1.9m121-5 Integrated office productivity suite i openoffice.org-he 1.9m121-5 Language Pack(he) for OpenOffice.org I'm not sure why the parse error I reported on 8/5 didn't reoccur, since the patch was updated on 8/

[Fink-users] Openoffice.org-1.9m121-4: Parse Error

2005-08-04 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Since I've not made the transition to Tiger yet, my latest attempt to install openoffice.org was with 1.9m121-4, where I got the following: Making: ../../../unxmacxp.pro/slo/viewshe1.obj g++-3.3 [includes, warnings, etc. omitted] -o ../../../unxmacxp.pro/slo/viewshe1.o /sw/src/fink.

[Fink-users] Openoffice: Disk Full Error Again

2005-08-02 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Hello, I'm still getting disk-full errors installing openoffice.org, as the process still tries to install all of the language packages. Latest attempt involved deletion from the .info file of all the Splitoffs except eng-US and he, and retention of the --with-lang=ALL parameter. Nevertheless

[Fink-users] Openoffice.org: Disk Full Problem Again with Language Pack

2005-07-29 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
For anyone who may have been following my attempts to install openoffice.org and the openoffice.org-he subpackage, I wish to report that having successfully installed and run openoffice, I failed to install openoffice.org-he. I had reverted to the original .info file; notwithstanding that openo

[Fink-users] Openoffice: Successful Installation with Tweaked .info File

2005-07-27 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
I've successfully installed openoffice.org, launched it, and followed it through the registration process, using my abridged .info file,as I described previously: 1. Delete the line with the --with-lang option from the ConfigureParams: script; 2. Delete the SplitOff: scripts. Accordi

[Fink-users] Another OpenOffice Build Failure

2005-07-26 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
After making my proposed alterations to the .info file -- deletion of the --with-lang=ALL parameter from ConfigureParams: and all of the Splitoffs -- I still got: Making: ../../unxmacxp.pro/slo/FDatabaseMetaDataResultSetMetaData.obj g++-3.3 -fsigned-char -fmessage-length=0 -malign-natural -c

Re: [Fink-users] openoffice.org: Two Tweaks of the .info File Fail

2005-07-24 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 8:20 PM -0400 7/23/05, Jonathan Levi MD wrote: I _almost_ installed openoffice: ...but... the installation process is determined to install a language package other than en-US. Can anyone on the development team or elsewhere suggest how to get around this? I have two ideas for further

[Fink-users] openoffice.org: Two Tweaks of the .info File Fail

2005-07-23 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
I _almost_ installed openoffice: - I moved /usr/local to /usr/local.moved; - I edited openoffice.org.info to stop installation of all those language-packages: I changed ConfigureParams: << --with-lang=ALL \ first to ConfigureParams: << --with-lang=en-US \ then to ConfigureParams: <<

[Fink-users] openoffice.org: Out of Disk Space, Second Time

2005-07-21 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Seems that I crowed prematurely today about my impending success building openoffice.org. When I got home and inspected my laptop, the build process had failed, because the hard drive was full; there was a reference: ERROR: Saved logfile: /sw/src/fink.build/openoffice.org-1.9m113-2/instseto

[Fink-users] Back to Error 65280 with Openoffice.org

2005-07-18 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Having failed to build openoffice.org last week due to space requirements of >50GB for building (see my "Opeoffice.org: Configure a Less Extensive Build?" of July 17) I'm now back to a 65280 error code for building. Dan Mack kindly explained a previous such error, but I can't figure out how to

[Fink-users] Opeoffice.org: Configure a Less Extensive Build?

2005-07-17 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Yesterday, as fink was building the newest openoffice.org package yesterday, my laptop sent me a warning that my 80GB hard drive was almost full, and that I needed to remove files. I scurried around and managed to remove a few GB, but no use: fink inexorably continued to build subpackage after

[Fink-users] Can't Build openoffice.org-1.9m97-3/portaudio

2005-06-09 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Missing directory? After running selfupdate, I ran "fink install openoffice.org openoffice.org-he" and got: = Building project portaudio = /sw/src/fink.build/openoffice.org-1.9m97-3/portaudio mkout -- version: 1.4 -- Making: ./unxmacxp.pro/misc

[Fink-users] Another Problem Making openoffice.org

2005-06-08 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Here's the problem part (I think) of the log: gcc -o xpidl -I/sw/include -I/usr/X11R6/include -Wall -W -Wno-unused -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wno-long-long -fpascal-strings -no-cpp-precomp -fno-common -pipe -DNDEBUG -DTRIMMED -O -I/sw/include/glib-2.0 -I/sw/lib/glib-2.0/include -I/sw/inc

Re: [Fink-users] tetex updating issues

2005-06-05 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 11:08 AM +0200 6/5/05, Thibaut Cousin wrote: Maybe you should consider switching to pdf by default. I made that switch three years ago and never looked back... For the most part, I agree. Most of what I do (always with plain TeX, not LaTeX), works quite well with pdftex. However, I someti

[Fink-users] Success of David's and Matthias's Tetex Files

2005-03-03 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
I don't have David Morrison's post, so I can't link my reply to it. However, from the Fink Users' Archive, I have: Thanks to some helpful comments from Matthias Neeracher, I think I may have fixed this problem. Since I'm not experiencing it myself, though, I would appreciate it if some users c

Re: [Fink-users] Office Computer Can't Compile fink-0.24.1-11

2005-03-02 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
(Check the office computer, then redirect to Fink-Users) At 8:27 PM -0500 3/1/05, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: Oh, yes, sorry (been here before) /sw/src is on a removable disk; you pointed me to http://fink.sourceforge.net/faq/usage-fink.php#ext-drive once before (although the "Ignore ownership" b

[Fink-users] More gnome-vfs Problems

2005-03-02 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
I tried to update-all again, and got a problem of a conflict with openssl1097-dev, so I removed it: su-3.00# fink remove openssl097-dev Information about 4704 packages read in 14 seconds. dpkg --remove openssl097-dev (Reading database ... 74869 files and directories currently installed.) Removing

[Fink-users] gnome-vfs_2_

2005-03-01 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
OK, so I failed to notice that there are both gnome-vfs and gnome-vfs2 packages. Nevertheless, when I do fink list gnome-vfs, I get Information about 4704 packages read in 13 seconds. [gnome-vfs packages] (i) gnome-vfs2 2.6.1.1-15 The GNOME virtual file-system libraries (i) gnome-

[Fink-users] Is There a Fink App To...

2005-01-02 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
... search for the presence of a user-supplied string in an arbitrary number of files? TIA, Jonathan --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun a

[Fink-users] Help Linking a C++ Program, Please

2005-01-01 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Happy New Year, all! I've initiated a return to studying C++, but am having trouble linking a simple program (following log edited for ease of reading): jonathan$ cat hello.cpp #include int main(){ std::cout << "Hello World!\n"; return 0; } jonathan$ gcc -o hello hello.cpp ld: Und

[Fink-users] compiling tcltk-8.4.6-2 failed

2004-12-16 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
I didn't see anything obviously pertinent in the fink-users' list, so: creating Makefile creating tkConfig.sh gcc -pipe -c -Os -Wall -Wconversion -Wno-implicit-int -fno-common -I/sw/src/tcltk-8.4.6-2/tk8.4.6/unix -I/sw/src/tcltk-8.4.6-2/tk8.4.6/unix/../generic -I/sw/src/tcltk-8.4.6-2/tk8.4.6/uni

Re: [Fink-users] compiling tcltk-8.4.6-2 failed

2004-12-14 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 10:25 PM -0500 12/13/04, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: (And Martin wrote:) [snip] Thanks to both Martin and Alexander (in order of whose response I saw first). In order to get a complete compilation log, I attempted to reinstall tcltk. This time, installation proceeded to a successful conclusion.

[Fink-users] compress-zlib-pm581 Solved

2004-12-12 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 7:31 AM + 12/9/04, Daniel E. Macks wrote: > Failed TestStat Wstat Total Fail Failed List of Failed --- t/01version.t 11 100.00% 1 t/02zlib.t 2391 0.42% 1 t/04encoding.t

[Fink-users] Re: More on compress-zlib-pm584

2004-12-09 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 7:31 AM + 12/9/04, Daniel E. Macks wrote: Jonathan Levi MD <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: [...] make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /sw/bin/perl5.8.4 "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t [...] Fail

[Fink-users] "Make Test" Error Compiling compress-zlib-pm560, Too

2004-12-08 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Just for the fun of it, I went back and tried to compile compress-zlib-pm560, and got an earlier version of the same error message as with -pm581 and -pm584: make test PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /sw/bin/perl5.6.0 -Iblib/arch -Iblib/lib -I/sw/lib/perl5/5.6.0/darwin -I/sw/lib/perl5/5.6.0 -e 'use Test::Ha

[Fink-users] More on compress-zlib-pm581 (or pm584)

2004-12-08 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Continuing a previous discussion of Compress-zlib-pm581 failing tests: From: Alexander K. Hansen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Re: Compress-zlib-pm581 failing tests On 2004-10-02 11:40, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Oct 2, 2004, at 1:35 PM, Jim DeVona wrote: [errors re compiling compress-zlib-pm581-1.33-12

Re: [Fink-users] problem with selfupdate

2004-11-08 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Whenever curl can't find a file now, I just choose [5] and skip the other options. That seems to work consistently, and nothing else does; I had the same problem with base-files, and [5] worked fine. Jonathan At 10:34 PM -0800 11/7/04, Kevin Burnett wrote: I am having a problem when I try fink s

[Fink-users] ImageMagick 6.0.7-6 Installed Uneventfully

2004-09-15 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Jonathan --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: thawte's Crypto Challenge Vl Crack the code and win a Sony DCRHC40 MiniDV Digital Handycam Camcorder. More prizes in the weekly Lunch Hour Challenge. Sign up NOW http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;1074025

[Fink-users] ImageMagick Updated Again

2004-09-13 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Hi Jeff, Thank you for recently updating the ImageMagick package to 6.0.7-1, then 6.0.7-2. However, I discovered earlier today that the folks at Imageagick have updated their versions, too: 6.0.7-2 and * 7-4 for stable and beta, respectively. Googling for 7.2 yeilds lots of entries, but only (

[Fink-users] Re: Upgrade ImageMagick Version?

2004-09-10 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 7:09 PM + 9/10/04, Daniel E. Macks wrote: I see 10.3/unstable just got upgraded to 6.0.7-1. Great. Thanks for letting me know, I'll try it. Regarding our stable tree, we need positive feedback about a package before we move it to stable. So if you find a package in unstable that works well b

[Fink-users] Upgrade ImageMagick Version?

2004-09-06 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Dear Fink Users, I'd really like to suggest upgrading our imagemagick pagkages from the 5.5.1-23 and 5.5.6-23 in our respective stable and unstable trees. ImageMagick itself is currently offering 6.0.6-2 "Stable", 6.0.7 "Beta" at its web site. I've built 6.0.6-2 myself and have been using it fo

Re: [Fink-users] Upgrading to 10.3.4 and emacs21

2004-05-27 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 1:41 PM -0400 5/27/04, Viktor Haag wrote: I upgraded my main machine to 10.3.4 today, and noticed that you'll almost certainly need to rebuild emacs21 (and probably emacsen-common, to be safe). I haven't used emacs recently, but I tried it when I read your letter (I installed 10.3.4 yesterday)

[Fink-users] Re: Can't Compile help2man

2004-05-07 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 6:43 PM -0400 5/7/04, Darian Lanx wrote: Jonathan Levi, M.D. wrote: [Compiling help2man fails...] You have a broken, old dlfcn.h in your /usr/local/include Bingo! But how did you know? Jonathan --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by Sleepycat

[Fink-users] Selfupdate-rsync and Local/Main Packages

2004-05-01 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
When doing a selfupdate (using rsync) I notice that the list of --includes in the /usr/bin/su [user] -c "rsync..." command doesn't refer anywhere to local/main, which is in my fink.conf trees. Do the packages in my local/main directories get updated, too? If not, is there any way to do this sho

Re: OT: Re: [Fink-users] Help Converting DICOM File into a Movie?

2004-04-16 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 5:24 PM -0400 4/16/04, James Gibbs wrote: On Apr 14, 2004, at 11:45 PM, Jonathan Levi, M.D. wrote: ...Some... CD's of DICOM files I've been given are in a "strange" disk format, the Joliet extension of the ISO 9660 format. I've located a freeware Macintosh application, Joliet File System for

Re: [Fink-users] Help Converting DICOM File into a Movie?

2004-03-25 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Dan and Jens, many thanks. I'll follow-up on this list when I have some further results. Jonathan At 12:28 AM + 3/25/04, Daniel E. Macks wrote: Jonathan Levi, M.D. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: I have a number of DICOM medical files, which are in the form of multi-frame cine loops. I want to pl

Re: [Fink-users] Fwd: problem updating clisp 2.32-1

2004-03-03 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
I think I've got the posting-sequence right, despite the times: At 8:26 PM -0600 2/29/04, Joe Corneli wrote: I couldn't build the new CLISP package. ;; Loaded file floatprint.lisp ;; Loading file type.lisp ... [stream.d:4034] *** - UNIX error 2 (ENOENT): No such file or directory Bye. mv lispimag

Re: [Fink-users] Fink fink fink...and Panther

2004-02-24 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 9:24 PM +0900 2/24/04, BABA Yoshihiko wrote: On 24 Feb 2004, at 18:31, N L wrote: Hello I am having a problem: I follow for the 5th time what is said on the faq of the fink site: removing X11 and Xfree86 and reinstalled them with the cd rom 3 of panther and the SDKX11 and I did the selfupdate

[Fink-users] "You have an existing X11..." Finally, OK (Was: Re: "You have an existing X11 installation" Persists...)

2004-02-22 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
OK, I finally have gotten rid of the nasty "You have an existing X11 installation", with help from Alexander, Martin (indirectly) and at least one other. Here's a summary, cleaned up (multiple redundant steps eliminated) of what I did (not necessarily in this order): [As] Alexander Hansen wrot

"You have an existing X11 installation" Persists (Was: Re: [Fink-users] Where has system-xfree86 gone?)

2004-02-21 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 3:16 PM -0500 2/19/04, Alexander K. Hansen wrote: On Feb 19, 2004, at 8:43 AM, Jonathan Levi MD wrote: I thought it possibly useful to run "perl fink-x11-debug". Here's the output: ** [:~/Desktop] jonathan% perl fink

Re: Fwd: [Fink-users] Where has system-xfree86 gone ?

2004-02-19 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 6:46 PM +0100 2/18/04, Enrico Riboni wrote: De: "Alexander K. Hansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: 17 février 2004 21:32:00 GMT+01:00 system-xfree86 is a virtual package, which gets installed if your X11 installation is correct. To figure out what's going on, download the following script: http

[Fink-users] [ANNOUNCE] ImageMagick 6.0.0 Beta Available

2004-02-10 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Dear Fink Users, Newer versions of ImageMagick than what we currently use are available at http://www.imagemagick.org/www/archives.html. Version 5.5.7 is listed there as stable, while version 6.0.0 is listed as beta. Version 6.0.0 appears to me to have at least one major advance: it is said to

[Fink-users] Request for ImageMagick 6.0.0/beta

2004-02-08 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Hi, I'm writing to request newer ImageMagick packages. Currently, the Fink Packages database lists version 5.5.1-23 in the current-stable trees, 5.5.6-23 in the unstable ones. By contrast, http://www.imagemagick.org/www/archives.html lists 5.5.7 as stable, 6.0.0 Developers Beta as unstable. It

Re: [Fink-users] Personalizing emacs.

2004-02-05 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 2:31 PM +1100 2/6/04, Rohan Lloyd wrote: On 6 Feb 2004, at 11:17 AM, Andrea Riciputi wrote: Hi, I've installed Fink's emacs and I'd like to personalize it (i.e. add some .el files to site-package dir). Can I simply add them to /sw/share/emacs/site-lisp? Or is it better to put them somewhere

Re: [Fink-users] Clisp on Fink

2004-01-28 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 9:44 AM -0500 1/28/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: May I respectfully request a new version of clisp for 10.2-gcc3.3? Fink is at version 2.29; clisp is up to 2.32. Please make it for 10.3 as well. (We should make some allowances for Matthias, who I'm sure is involved in a thousand projects: clis

Re: [Fink-users] binaries/builds for new fink install on G5/10.3?

2004-01-25 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 11:32 PM -0500 1/24/04, James Gibbs wrote: On Jan 23, 2004, at 7:42 PM, Prahlad Gupta wrote: My question: do you recommend I go with binaries; or try to build where possible? I'm aware that emacs has been problematic. ...Nearly everything is available now for 10.3. I can't speak specifically

Re: [Fink-users] Mozilla fails to compile

2004-01-11 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 3:21 PM +0100 1/10/04, Martin Costabel wrote: Michèle Garoche wrote: [] i freetype-hinting 1.3.1-8 TrueType font Remove this one. It is only installed as a build time dependency and is harmful when it is left installed afterwards. Is that true for all of us, withou

Re: [Fink-users] system-xfree86

2003-11-24 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 8:47 AM -0600 11/24/03, Augie Fackler wrote: I tried to install gimp yesterday, but fink and apt-get insist that system-xfree86 is no good and try to replace it with some real xfree packages. I am using 10.2 with gcc 3.3, if that helps. I have Apple's X11 beta installed. Is there a dependency

Re: [Fink-users] More Selfupdate-rsync Problems

2003-11-03 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 2:57 PM -0500 11/3/03, David R. Morrison wrote: It may be that one of the new fink rsync mirrors was not working properly when you tried to update. (I believe that DNS now randomly chooses one of the mirrors to do your updating.) So I suggest that you try the update again. You should not need

Re: [Fink-users] Weird Formatting in Emacs Info Dir

2003-10-25 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 8:29 AM +0200 10/23/03, Martin Costabel wrote: Jonathan Levi, M.D. wrote: Can anyone explain why emacs is doing the following formatting of its Info directory? Here's a sample: * Flex: (flex). A fast scanne

Re: [Fink-users] new update method available

2003-10-09 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
At 11:30 PM -0400 10/8/03, David R. Morrison wrote: The newest fink package manager release, version 0.14.0 now in the unstable tree, offers a new update method for fink users using rsync rather than cvs. [A]nyone who updates to this new version of fink can safely install the recent updates to the

[Fink-users] Perl 5.8.1

2003-09-25 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Hi, Does anyone know when perl-5.8.1 will be added to the fink packages? And does it contain major differences from perl-5.8.0? Thanks, Jonathan --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf _

[Fink-users] Emacs Info Format Problem

2003-09-14 Thread Jonathan Levi MD
Hi, Can anyone help me with a problem in the formatting of the Info Directory node? In the * Menu, the "Text Creation and manipulation" section and subsequent sections up to the Emacs section are misformatted. Whereas the end of the TeX section appears normal, i.e., * vptovf: (web2c)vptovf inv