On Thu, 2005-02-24 at 07:03, Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:09:04 +
Steve Hosgood wrote:
If I just type fgfs or fgfs --disable-sound, all I get is the splash
screen and plenty of disk-grinding noises followed by the splash-screen
disappearing and the single-word
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:03:36 +0100, Jorge wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:09:04 +
Steve Hosgood wrote:
If I just type fgfs or fgfs --disable-sound, all I get is the
splash screen and plenty of disk-grinding noises followed by the
splash-screen
From: Paul Surgeon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm an ASEL pilot (without glider training) but I was of the impression
that the variometer was a slightly modified pitot tube connected to a VSI.
That sounds about right.
As far as I know one can hook up most variometers to any TE probe.
The easy
On Thursday, 24 February 2005 18:49, Alex Perry wrote:
The easy non-software thing to do is to hook up a second VSI simulation
to the pitot simulation instead of the static simulation. Then, take
the VSI instrument and change the artwork to look like a vario and add
a second rotation layer.
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 18:51, Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Wednesday, 23 February 2005 20:07, Alex Perry wrote:
1. Create a new Variometer instrument module i C++.
If I was able to create a Total Energy Tube module it
still leaves me without a way to perform calculations and
I'm trying to build the 0.9.8 js_demo utility under Windows using nmake and
I keep getting:
fatal error u1035: syntax error : expected ':' or '=' seperator Stop.
I'm running nmake from the man directory using [nmake Makefile.in install].
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Vance
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 09:48, Erik Hofman wrote:
Martin Spott wrote:
Cheers,
Martin.
P.S.: Who created the static B737 and B747 models that are sitting at
KSFO ?
I think Innis did the 737, but the 747 I wouldn't know.
It could be a good time to remove both static
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 14:19, Innis Cunningham wrote:
Erik Hofman writes
I think Innis did the 737, but the 747 I wouldn't know.
It could be a good time to remove both static planes since the Traffic
manager gets quite powerful already.
No I did the 747 David M did the 737 and yes
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:21:07 +0100
Arnt Karlsen wrote:
..' lspci -v |grep -A 15 VGA '?
(My 9250 on DRI is reported as a 9200 PRO)
01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Radeon R250 Lf [Radeon
Mobility 9000 M9] (rev 01) (prog-if 00 [VGA])
Subsystem: Asustek Computer,
I'm getting seg faults 25% - 50% of the time when I try to start fg.
This is on a fresh install of Mandrake 10.1 with the latest CVS of plib,
simgear, flightgear, with the latest nvidia drivers.
e.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mat]$ fgfs --fg-root=/home/Flightgear/data
mat churchill wrote :
I'm getting seg faults 25% - 50% of the time when I try to start fg.
This is on a fresh install of Mandrake 10.1 with the latest CVS of
plib, simgear, flightgear, with the latest nvidia drivers.
e.g.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mat]$ fgfs --fg-root=/home/Flightgear/data
* mat churchill -- Thursday 24 February 2005 22:18:
I'm getting seg faults 25% - 50% of the time when I try to start fg.
This is on a fresh install of Mandrake 10.1 with the latest CVS of plib,
simgear, flightgear, with the latest nvidia drivers.
[...]
it then crashes before or during the
* Melchior FRANZ -- Thursday 24 February 2005 22:48:
(0) compile link plib/sg/fgfs with 'debug' symbols (-g option)
adding -O0 may be useful, too. (Turns off optimization and can make the debugger
output easier to understand.)
(2b) or run fgfs in gdb already:
$ gdb --args fgfs
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:08:51 +0100, Jorge wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:03:36 +0100
Jorge Van Hemelryck wrote:
xorg 6.7.0, open-source radeon driver
glxgears ~2180fps, fgfs ~35-50fps (yay!!)
specular highlight enabled
Oops, I kind of mixed everything up
* mat churchill -- Thursday 24 February 2005 23:09:
Is this what I should be getting ?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] mat]$ gdb `which fgfs` /home/mat/core.3564
[less interesting parts]
Loaded symbols for /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/locale/lib/common/xlcDef.so.2
#0 0x4032fc4b in jhash_get () from
For the last several days I have been getting the following error when
compiling fgrun from cvs.
main.o(.text+0x18e): In function `main':
/usr/local/source/fgrun/src/main.cxx:87: undefined reference to `Fl::lock()'
So I removed all the files and do a clean co from cvs. I still get the
same
Can anyone explain to me how the camera, and view frustum, and field of
view is setup fot the inside a 3d cockpit view versus an outside
view? There have been a lot of fingers in the code since I last looked
at it (years ago) and I'm missing a key piece of the puzzle.
Hopefully none of this
From: Curtis L. Olson
Sent: Thursday, 24. Feb 2005 23:37 -0500
To: FlightGear developers discussions
Ok it's too late for me to be a lot of help right now.
A couple of things.
1) Does everything work ok in other lookfrom views (where the camera rotates
from a
viewpoint). The second tower
* Dave Perry -- Friday 25 February 2005 03:52:
main.o(.text+0x18e): In function `main':
/usr/local/source/fgrun/src/main.cxx:87: undefined reference to `Fl::lock()'
So I removed all the files and do a clean co from cvs. I still get the
same error.
Any ideas? I am running FC2 (with all
19 matches
Mail list logo
