David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I passed my instrument flight test this morning -- thank you all for
the positive karma you sent my way.
Thanks four your report and congratulations for passing the exam. These are
the stories that non PPL holders like me do learn from. When I did the
Jim Wilson wrote:
Lee Elliott [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Changing the model would stop that working of course, as the geometry would've
changed, but it's a quick and simple way of getting a 'lite' (er) version of
a model, at least with regard to texture space requirements.
Innis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Hi Jim
Are you working on a low poly version of the 747 for scenery work.
Just a demonstration. If you saw the screenshot, that shows how far I got
with about 3 minutes work. It could be better.
I was working on it yesterday.Regrouping the fuse to
I'm bringing a bad news guys. I was contacting Rober Lozada (Falcon F16
modeler) for a help to include his models in FlightGear. He didn't agree
to that due to lack of time. I asked him about the permission of use in
case we figure it out how to import Falcon models, but I didn't get the
Jim Wilson writes
You know, I'm not sure if we have to worry about using private carrier
liveries from a copyright perspective. AFAIK Southwest is the first
one...in
fact I didn't notice the static model was Southwest until just now (duh!).
Does anyone know about this?
If it is a problem
David Megginson wrote:
Alex Perry writes:
[...] When we broke out at 4000 ft on our initial climb out from
Ottawa, and the windows were suddenly filled with sunlight and
glorious white cloudtops, everyone in the plane gasped -- it
kind-of makes all the work for the rating worthwhile.
Innis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyway if you have a look the 747 is painted in Pakistan Airlines colors and
the A320 in Air France colors.So southwest is not the first.
I was going to say that those aren't private carriers, but a couple years
back it seems there was a news article
Jim Wilson writes:
I was going to say that those aren't private carriers, but a couple
years back it seems there was a news article about Air France
planning to go semi-private. Still Southwest is the first private
non-national livery and I think that might make a
difference...don't
Jim Wilson wrote:
Innis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyway if you have a look the 747 is painted in Pakistan Airlines colors
and
the A320 in Air France colors.So southwest is not the first.
I was going to say that those aren't private carriers, but a couple years
back it seems
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
You're thinking about something that's very specific to the U.S. As
far as I understand, the U.S. government is not allowed to copyright
(and, perhaps, trademark?) any IP -- that's why people are allowed to
copy and distribute the FAA database and the
This was just added to the Canadian AIP:
Glide path installations generate a radiated signal resulting in a
normal glide path angle of 3deg (it can currently be anywhere from
2.5deg up to 3.5deg). The normal antenna pattern, of glide path
installations, generates a side-lobe. The
Jim Wilson writes:
So, should we do anything differently with our models?
For now, no: if we ever get a cease-and-desist letter, we can discuss
it it then. Trademark violation is a complicated thing anyway -- I
don't think that Campbell's soup could have successfully sued Andy
Warhol even if
David Megginson wrote:
Jim Wilson writes:
So, should we do anything differently with our models?
For now, no: if we ever get a cease-and-desist letter, we can discuss
it it then. Trademark violation is a complicated thing anyway -- I
don't think that Campbell's soup could have
As I said earlier MSFS has been painting A/C in world airline(private and
government)colors for years.And I would think if you are going to sue
someone it might as well be someone with money and good old uncle Bill G
would the one to try and get money out of.
The whole area of copyright can
* Frederic Bouvier -- Wednesday 30 July 2003 16:32:
I think that if we are respectful in the use of the marks ( right
font, right colors ) and we do it in context, there will be no
problem.
ACK! I do even think that airlines =want= to be represented in
serious flight simulators. After all,
David,
This was just added to the Canadian AIP:
Glide path installations generate a radiated signal resulting in a
normal glide path angle of 3deg (it can currently be anywhere from
2.5deg up to 3.5deg). The normal antenna pattern, of glide path
installations, generates a
Melchior FRANZ writes:
ACK! I do even think that airlines =want= to be represented in
serious flight simulators. After all, that's free advertisement.
The Austrian Airlines, for example, even host the homepage of
a flight sim group that duplicates the real AUA in the virtual
sim domain
Major A writes:
Your post raises another question of course: in FlightGear, the
glideslope and localizer either both have sufficient signal or none of
them. Is this realistic?
No. What actually happens is that the needles wag all over the place,
and the GS and TO/FROM flags flicker on and
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
We need to redo all of the NAV radios. I did the DME (it still needs
work), but the others are still in their old versions in the
src/Cockpit/ directory.
BTW, we could use a second DME. I was going to look at that at some point.
Does that sound
serious flight simulators. After all, that's free advertisement.
The Austrian Airlines, for example, even host the homepage of
a flight sim group that duplicates the real AUA in the virtual
sim domain (the virtual Austrian Airlines group). The group
seems to take this all very
Jim Wilson writes:
BTW, we could use a second DME. I was going to look at that at some point.
Does that sound reasonably straight forward from what you recall of it?
It would be very little work. I need to modularize the whole
Instruments and Systems directories -- twins typically have
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
serious flight simulators. After all, that's free advertisement.
The Austrian Airlines, for example, even host the homepage of
a flight sim group that duplicates the real AUA in the virtual
sim domain (the virtual Austrian Airlines group). The
hello coders,
wahre can flightgear portet for beos/zeta?
...
i hope any coder make this!
pleas for answere
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
David Megginson [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jim Wilson writes:
BTW, we could use a second DME. I was going to look at that at some point.
Does that sound reasonably straight forward from what you recall of it?
It would be very little work. I need to modularize the whole
Instruments
Ralf Schuelke wrote:
hello coders,
wahre can flightgear portet for beos/zeta?
...
i hope any coder make this!
pleas for answere
There has been someone working on a Beos port of FlightGear hasn't it?
I don't know what the result was.
Erik
___
thus not which I had the wild jemad that made or forwards, in any case
giebt it fligthgear not for beos! and in such a way I make on (hobit as
smaller) and look for myself more coder those for havens!
Am Mit, 2003-07-30 um 20.57 schrieb Erik Hofman:
Ralf Schuelke wrote:
hello coders,
wahre
On the manufacturing side, however, Cessna and Piper seem to have
withdrawn their permission for representation of logos, etc., between
FLY and FLY II.
That's because Microsoft overbid on the licensing contract to deny it to
Terminal Reality. See 2 bit company that can't stand 1
http://www.msnbc.com/news/946048.asp?0cv=CB10
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
Ralf Schuelke wrote:
thus not which I had the wild jemad that made or forwards, in any case
giebt it fligthgear not for beos! and in such a way I make on (hobit as
smaller) and look for myself more coder those for havens!
Could you write this in German, I think I'm going to undertand that better.
Jon Berndt wrote:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/946048.asp?0cv=CB10
And all of a sudden it looked like a B-1.
Erik
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flightgear-devel
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 20:35, Erik Hofman wrote:
Jon Berndt wrote:
http://www.msnbc.com/news/946048.asp?0cv=CB10
And all of a sudden it looked like a B-1.
Erik
LOL
:)
LeeE
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gene Buckle [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
I was a beta tester for Fly! II. Negotiations with Cessna, etc. were
suddenly terminated and all of a sudden Microsoft starts touting Cessna
and Piper connections. It started quite the anti-ms rant on the tester
forum.
Sigh...Godfather Gates. Maybe we
also nicht das ich wste das jemad das gemacht oder vor hatte, auf jeden
fall giebt es fligthgear nicht fr beos ! und so mache ich mich auf (wie
ein kleiner hobit) und suche coder die das porten!
Am Mit, 2003-07-30 um 21.30 schrieb Erik Hofman:
Ralf Schuelke wrote:
thus not which I had the
Ralf Schuelke wrote:
also nicht das ich wste das jemad das gemacht oder vor hatte, auf jeden
fall giebt es fligthgear nicht fr beos ! und so mache ich mich auf (wie
ein kleiner hobit) und suche coder die das porten!
Ah I see.
Bernie Bright has been working on a Beos port but has never completed
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2003 20:57:
There has been someone working on a Beos port of FlightGear hasn't it?
We had this in our Thanks file for a while:
Bernie Bright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Many C++ style, usage, and implementation improvements.
STL portability, tons o' stuff. :-)
I do not know! therefore I ask here for whether one of you that make
can!
in german:
ich kenne keinen! deshalb frage ich ja hier nach ob einer von euch das
machen kann!
Am Mit, 2003-07-30 um 21.58 schrieb Erik Hofman:
Ralf Schuelke wrote:
also nicht das ich wste das jemad das gemacht oder
ja dan werde ich ihn mal anmailen! danke! hoffe das er den port auch
nocht macht!
dan I become it times anmailen! thanks! hope which it the haven makes
also nocht!
Am Mit, 2003-07-30 um 22.03 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
* Erik Hofman -- Wednesday 30 July 2003 20:57:
There has been someone
:-)
i have say, i will look vor the port ! and mail the guy !
and tnake you for your helps!
mfg ralf
Am Mit, 2003-07-30 um 22.30 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
* Ralf Schuelke -- Wednesday 30 July 2003 22:15:
ja dan werde ich ihn mal anmailen! danke! hoffe das er den port auch
nocht macht!
* Ralf Schuelke -- Wednesday 30 July 2003 22:15:
ja dan werde ich ihn mal anmailen! danke! hoffe das er den port auch
nocht macht!
dan I become it times anmailen! thanks! hope which it the haven makes
also nocht!
But maybe you should try a human translator. Your machine
translated English
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 08:39:44 +0200,
Matevz Jekovec [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I'm bringing a bad news guys. I was contacting Rober Lozada (Falcon
F16 modeler) for a help to include his models in FlightGear. He
didn't agree to that due to lack of time. I asked him
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 12:33:17 +0200,
Frederic Bouvier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jim Wilson wrote:
Innis Cunningham [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Anyway if you have a look the 747 is painted in Pakistan Airlines
colors and the A320 in Air France colors.So
On 30 Jul 2003 22:41:42 +0200,
Ralf Schuelke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Am Mit, 2003-07-30 um 22.30 schrieb Melchior FRANZ:
* Ralf Schuelke -- Wednesday 30 July 2003 22:15:
ja dan werde ich ihn mal anmailen! danke! hoffe das er den port
auch nocht macht!
Thanks David.
WillyB
On Wednesday 30 July 2003 18:18, David Megginson wrote:
WillyB writes:
The fulcrum of the needle needs to be at the base of the gauge but
I can only get it to rotate around the center.
I tried these things in the xml file: oil-pressure.xml (which I
made
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 20:57:08 +0200
Erik Hofman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ralf Schuelke wrote:
hello coders,
wahre can flightgear portet for beos/zeta?
...
i hope any coder make this!
pleas for answere
There has been someone working on a Beos port of FlightGear hasn't it?
I don't
Ah Ha!
The version of Docs/fgfs-model-howto.html
is different online than Docs/model-howto.html offline.
I was looking into the offline version and when I looked online I find more
info.
I'd used the center as well.. but was using the Y axis and not the Z axis,
which made it look like it was
I tried to generate asw20 panel using T38 aircraft by changing the name of the
panel picture. I found out that ASW20 picture background comes out white,
while the panel of T38 has a transparent background. When I open them up as
picture files, they all show white background.
I don't know how to
46 matches
Mail list logo
