On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Jack Mermod wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I recently was on Multiplayer, flying with a friend, minding my own
business, when another pilot asked a general newbie question: Where can I
find the Nimitz?. In only good intent, I replied: Look around the Golden
Gate Bridge,
Oh dear ...
http://www.noswearing.com/dictionary
I was going to say that we could probably do a pretty good job at coming up
with a list ourselves, then I saw this site and realized I'm a complete
novice ...
Could we also filter at the MP server level? It might be nice to filter at
the sending
That stuff is unnecessary and in
real life you'd probably get your license yanked if you were caught using
foul language on the radio.
Here, in Canada , its a $5000 fine and/or a year in jail.That,s a
pretty good deterrent :).
On 10/19/2010 7:56 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Jack Mermod wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I recently was on Multiplayer, flying with a friend, minding my own
business, when another pilot asked a general newbie question: Where can I
find the Nimitz?. In only good
?Forgive my ignorance, but what happens at the moment? Does nobody say
anything to the abusers? Doesn't peer pressure, good example and setting
guidelines present a more realistic solution (realistic by comparison with
what happens in real world aviation I mean) rather than coming up with an
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Reagan Thomas thomas...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10/19/2010 7:56 AM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
On Mon, Oct 18, 2010 at 5:01 AM, Jack Mermod wrote:
Hi Everybody,
I recently was on Multiplayer, flying with a friend, minding my own
business, when another pilot asked
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
Oh dear ...
http://www.noswearing.com/dictionary
I was going to say that we could probably do a pretty good job at coming up
with a list ourselves, then I saw this site and realized I'm a complete
novice ...
A filter like this belongs in the client
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:25 AM, syd adams adams@gmail.com wrote:
That stuff is unnecessary and in
real life you'd probably get your license yanked if you were caught using
foul language on the radio.
Here, in Canada , its a $5000 fine and/or a year in jail.That,s a
pretty good
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Gene Buckle wrote:
A filter like this belongs in the client machine, not the server.
It's not the job of a multi-player server to provide nanny services. If
the end user doesn't want to see adult language, they're welcome to enable
whatever filtering that
On Tuesday 19 October 2010 16:41:35 Mally wrote:
?Forgive my ignorance, but what happens at the moment? Does nobody say
anything to the abusers? Doesn't peer pressure, good example and setting
guidelines present a more realistic solution (realistic by comparison with
what happens in real world
On Tue, 19 Oct 2010, Curtis Olson wrote:
On Tue, Oct 19, 2010 at 9:57 AM, Gene Buckle wrote:
A filter like this belongs in the client machine, not the server.
It's not the job of a multi-player server to provide nanny services. If
the end user doesn't want to see adult language, they're
Promoting the concept of free market place of ideas here:
The multiplayer server source is open and anyone can setup their own server.
Sure the MP system is only fun when there are lots of people participating
...
But if someone wants to have their own private free for all and express any
A few additional details can be found by reading the relevant post as
jackmermod in the FG forums:
I experienced a horrible attack over mp today. I ended up flying up
on the attackers 6 o'clock in my F-14 and firing upon him with over 20
Aim-9's in hopes of causing him to lag. Luckily I caused
Stefan Seifert wrote:
Very sensible words. Technical solutions usually don't work for social
problems.
Exactly this is the point, and I'd like to add that the social problem
we're currently looking at might be manifold
Cheers,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just
Instead of trying to put together a list, you should watch a video of George
Carlin's Seven dirty words.
Censorship is not the solution to this kind of problem.
It is just too easy to come up with a way to be offensive, or to threaten
someone. If you decide to censor, then YOU take the
On Tuesday 19 October 2010 18:51:37 Martin Spott wrote:
Stefan Seifert wrote:
Very sensible words. Technical solutions usually don't work for social
problems.
Exactly this is the point, and I'd like to add that the social problem
we're currently looking at might be manifold
But I'd
Gary Neely wrote
A few additional details can be found by reading the relevant post as
jackmermod in the FG forums:
I experienced a horrible attack over mp today. I ended up flying up
on the attackers 6 o'clock in my F-14 and firing upon him with over 20
Aim-9's in hopes of causing him
Hal V. Engel wrote
On Tuesday, October 19, 2010 02:15:08 pm Vivian Meazza wrote:
Gary Neely wrote
A few additional details can be found by reading the relevant post as
jackmermod in the FG forums:
I experienced a horrible attack over mp today. I ended up flying up
on the
One account per IP address is not a good idea, because it is very well
possible for several independent people to use the same public IP
address. In IPv4 at least with NAT routers. I can think of examples in
student homes with a shared broadband connection. Or the clubhouse of
the flying club.
19 matches
Mail list logo
