On Mon, Jan 02, 2006 at 10:20:20AM +0100, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
Still untested, but for the archive (and IIRC):
- execute = func { fgcommand(cmdargs().getValue(), args) }
+ execute = func { fgcommand(cmdarg().getValue(), args) }
- args.setStringValue("filename", "dummy");
+ args.getNode(
Paul Surgeon wrote:
> Python rocks (most of the time). :)
>
> However you'll need to add GUI library on top of Python since as far as I
> know
> it doesn't have a "built in one" like VB, Visual C++, Delphi, etc.
> Maybe Qt with the Python Qt bindings or something along those lines.
There is P
Am Dienstag 03 Januar 2006 00:22 schrieb Paul Surgeon:
> On Tuesday 03 January 2006 00:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > I'd just follow this up by putting in a plug for Python. An advantage
> > of Perl/Python/Java/etc. is that they're cross-platform, as Martin
> > said. Another is that unless you
> You mean Java dictates how to do object-oriented design, while Perl
> gives you like always the choice of how you want to accomplish it.
No, I mean how object orientation was a hack tacked onto Perl long
after Perl had been invented, and how for many people it unfortunately
*feels* like that
Python rocks (most of the time). :)
However you'll need to add GUI library on top of Python since as far as I know
it doesn't have a "built in one" like VB, Visual C++, Delphi, etc.
Maybe Qt with the Python Qt bindings or something along those lines.
The beauty with those professional IDE's
e)
Any volunteers?
Dene
From: Martin Spott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Calling FG functions via network
interface
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 21:17:01 + (UTC)
Hello De
-To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Calling FG functions via network
interface
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 21:17:01 + (UTC)
Hello Dene,
"dene maxwell" wrote:
> My understanding of ActiveX controls are that th
Stefan Seifert wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> All three support object-oriented design, if you care about that
>> (Java the best; Perl the worst, but it's there).
>
> You mean Java dictates how to do object-oriented design, while Perl
> gives you like always the choice of how you want to ac
On Tuesday 03 January 2006 00:38, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I'd just follow this up by putting in a plug for Python. An advantage
> of Perl/Python/Java/etc. is that they're cross-platform, as Martin
> said. Another is that unless you're doing something extraordinarily
> cpu-intensive, they can b
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All three support object-oriented design, if you care about that
(Java the best; Perl the worst, but it's there).
You mean Java dictates how to do object-oriented design, while Perl
gives you like always the choice of how you want to accomplish it.
What recomends Java
> or, if you like scripting languages, you could have a look at
> Perl or Python and the respective user interface toolkits, which are
> indeed real cross-platform environments.
I'd just follow this up by putting in a plug for Python. An advantage
of Perl/Python/Java/etc. is that they're cross-p
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Calling FG functions via network interface
Date: Mon, 2 Jan 2006 21:17:01 + (UTC)
Hello Dene,
"dene maxwell" wrote:
> My understan
Hello Dene,
"dene maxwell" wrote:
> My understanding of ActiveX controls are that they can be used in a variety
> of languages and have the same look and feel across those platforms.
There is a significant difference between the terms "programming
language" and "platform". ActiveX is a Windows-
Thanks Curt for the encouragement. I would like to give something back to as
many people as I can as the help I've had to increase my enjoyment of FG is
tremendous and quite overwhelming at times. Unfortunately I have no
experience in the *nix world. I am aware of Xwindows because a variant of
;> To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Calling FG functions via network
>> interface
>> Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 20:32:37 +0100
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> dene maxwell schrieb:
>>
>>> I don't use windows specific
dene maxwell wrote:
Bugger! Does Xwindows support ActiveX controls?
I'm a linux guy so I have to ask, "ActiveWhat?" :-)
If I publish the source code it will at least provide the framework
for someone to adapt to a more suitable format for a variety of
platforms/OS's
It's your work so y
orge.net
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Calling FG functions via network interface
Date: Mon, 02 Jan 2006 20:32:37 +0100
Hi,
dene maxwell schrieb:
I don't use windows specific API calls but do use windows controls (it's
written under VB6). I&#
Hi,
dene maxwell schrieb:
I don't use windows specific API calls but do use windows controls (it's
written under VB6). I'm not sure if Xwindows supports these.
If you're using VB6, for sure it won't run on anything else than Windows.
Regards,
Ralf
---
Surely doable, but I hope you develop it w/o tying to the win32 GUI APIs
directly, rather using a portability layer, e.g. Qt or smth like that.
Also, you might find a lot of what you want already implemented in
http://sourceforge.net/projects/fgflightplanner
and then just add the missing feature
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 08:07:40AM -0600, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Paul Surgeon wrote:
Has anybody thought of a way to be able to call functions
inside FG via the network interface?
With a little wrapping, this can be done now. We have wrapped up a few
functions, but per
On Sun, Jan 01, 2006 at 08:07:40AM -0600, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
> >>Paul Surgeon wrote:
> >>>Has anybody thought of a way to be able to call functions
> >>>inside FG via the network interface?
> With a little wrapping, this can be done now. We have wrapped up a few
> functions, but perhaps need
> Hi, Can the prperty tree be accessed from within windows. As previously
> mentioned, I am developing a "Flight Planner" application with associated
> ATIS, VOR, ILS, DME tables. I would like to be able to read the current
> airport into the application, then select a destination with associated
>
Hi, Can the prperty tree be accessed from within windows. As previously
mentioned, I am developing a "Flight Planner" application with associated
ATIS, VOR, ILS, DME tables. I would like to be able to read the current
airport into the application, then select a destination with associated
Instr
Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Sunday 01 January 2006 05:09, Andy Ross wrote:
Paul Surgeon wrote:
Has anybody thought of a way to be able to call functions
inside FG via the network interface?
With a little wrapping, this can be done now. We have wrapped up a few
functions, but perh
On Sunday 01 January 2006 05:09, Andy Ross wrote:
> Paul Surgeon wrote:
> > Has anybody thought of a way to be able to call functions
> > inside FG via the network interface?
>
> Excellent idea. It'll go great with the future plans to allow
> functions to read and write files and spawn external pr
Paul Surgeon wrote:
> Has anybody thought of a way to be able to call functions
> inside FG via the network interface?
Excellent idea. It'll go great with the future plans to allow
functions to read and write files and spawn external programs. :)
Note that the current MP code will happily accept
Has anybody thought of a way to be able to call functions inside FG via the
network interface?
At the moment it seems that only the property tree is accessible.
It would be nice if I could make text display inside FG via the network
interface or pop up a yes/no dialog to get some user input, or t
27 matches
Mail list logo
