-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
David Megginson wrote:
> I have a new notebook (an HP TX1220, which is a stunningly beautiful
> machine), and decided to try compiling the latest CVS osg FlightGear
> instead of using the old precompiled plib version from the Ubuntu
> distro. Here are
On dim 23 septembre 2007, Vivian Meazza wrote:
> Melchior FRANZ wrote
>
> > Sent: 22 September 2007 16:03
> >
> > * Durk Talsma -- 9/19/2007 10:17 PM:
> > > Currently, the situation isn't as clear anymore, because the OSG
> > > version also has many new features which the PLib version doesn't,
> >
Melchior FRANZ wrote
> Sent: 22 September 2007 16:03
>
> * Durk Talsma -- 9/19/2007 10:17 PM:
> > Currently, the situation isn't as clear anymore, because the OSG
> > version also has many new features which the PLib version doesn't,
>
> The most obvious differences are AFAIK:
>
>fg/plib
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
>For me, having landing/taxi-lights is still a precondition for
>a release number 1.0. I'd feel rather embarrassed without.
Is anyone working on this? I'm interested in helping.
>fg/osg has made a lot of progress, though, (mainly thanks to
>Mathias and
* Durk Talsma -- 9/19/2007 10:17 PM:
> Currently, the situation isn't as clear anymore, because the OSG
> version also has many new features which the PLib version doesn't,
The most obvious differences are AFAIK:
fg/plib fg/osg
---
On 19/09/2007, Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Welcome back and thanks for the compliments! As for versions: No, there isn't
> a 1.0 in sight yet, but I'm currently trying to help Curt in getting ready
> for a new release soon. This will be a plib based release, called 0.9.1[1].
I didn't
Hi Durk,
On 9/20/07, Durk Talsma wrote:
> Currently, the situation isn't as clear anymore, because the OSG version also
> has many new features which the PLib version doesn't, but on the other hand,
> because of that, the plib version might be a bit more stable. For that, and
> for logistical r
Hi Sergey,
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 22:04, Sergey wrote:
>
> >This will be a plib based release
>
> But why not osg release ?
> If it concerns windows - then I just perfectly compiled it on windows
> ( I intend to develop a series of lessons for programmers to use
> FlightGear).
>
At the t
Hi Durk,
I'm new to the list.
So I do not know much on previous discussions, sorry for that.
But on
>This will be a plib based release
But why not osg release ?
If it concerns windows - then I just perfectly compiled it on windows
( I intend to develop a series of lessons for programmers to us
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 21:50, David Megginson wrote:
> On 19/09/2007, Durk Talsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Welcome back and thanks for the compliments! As for versions: No, there
> > isn't a 1.0 in sight yet, but I'm currently trying to help Curt in
> > getting ready for a new release
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 21:28, I wrote:
> This will be a plib based release, called 0.9.1.
Uh, should be 0.9.11
D.
-
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
Hi David,
On Wednesday 19 September 2007 21:17, David Megginson wrote:
> 3. Still no version 1.0, Curt?
>
> I don't have a lot of time to contribute, but I might try to help with
> #2, if anyone can point me to archived messages or other resources
> discussing the problem.
>
>
Welcome back and th
I have a new notebook (an HP TX1220, which is a stunningly beautiful
machine), and decided to try compiling the latest CVS osg FlightGear
instead of using the old precompiled plib version from the Ubuntu
distro. Here are some comments:
1. Wow! The program is looking great. It was a very nice su
13 matches
Mail list logo
