I've started the first phase of trimming down fgdata. I've removed the
an2 from fgdata and put it in its own repository called ac-an2 under
the Flightgear project. I'm going to proceed with moving other
aircraft which haven't been touched in a while into their own repos as
well. When we get down
: timoor...@gmail.com
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Proposal: Move airplanes to an SVN repository
I've started the first phase of trimming down fgdata. I've removed the
an2 from fgdata and put it in its own repository called ac-an2 under
the Flightgear
On Fri, 12 Aug 2011, Tim Moore wrote:
At the moment, James Turner or I would create a repo in the Flightgear
project that clones yours. I think we would give you commit rights in
that new repo.
To make this easier, I should add a couple of people from the modeling
side of the house as
Sound good? Any nominations? I favor the an2, which I like, has lots
of textures and sounds, and which hasn't seen any recent activity.
Sounds good! Another one might be Vostok-1. It eats up 166MB and has
only three commits.
Torsten
I wouldn't touch the Vostock right now, it might be taken as an afront by the
author
Alessandro
Date: Thu, 4 Aug 2011 09:50:04 +0200
From: tors...@t3r.de
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Proposal: Move airplanes to an SVN repository
Sound good
Tim Moore wrote
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Francesco Angelo Brisa
fbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Any news about a possible separation of aircrafts data from the fgdata
folder ?
I am afraid this topic is sligtly falling into the forget about it
folder
:-(
Cheers
Francesco
I wouldn't touch the Vostock right now, it might be taken as an afront
by the author
(*Shrugs*)
Looking at disk size, this list might help making decision.
(from du -ms *|sort -n)
47 an2
47 F-8E-Crusader
48 A340-600
50 f16
51 Short-Stirling
58 D510
65
Funny (!) that the last one in the first list will be unmaintain from now if I
read this ml correctly.
Regards,
-Fred
- Mail original -
I wouldn't touch the Vostock right now, it might be taken as an
afront
by the author
(*Shrugs*)
Looking at disk size, this list might help
On Thursday 04 August 2011 11:36:48 Torsten Dreyer wrote:
I wouldn't touch the Vostock right now, it might be taken as an afront
by the author
(*Shrugs*)
Looking at disk size, this list might help making decision.
(from du -ms *|sort -n)
47 an2
47 F-8E-Crusader
48
Frederic Bouvier wrote:
Funny (!) that the last one in the first list will be unmaintain from
now if I read this ml correctly.
Let's sit down and have a beer/wine/tea/vos...dka ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 11:39 AM, Francesco Angelo Brisa
fbr...@gmail.com wrote:
Any news about a possible separation of aircrafts data from the fgdata
folder ?
I am afraid this topic is sligtly falling into the forget about it folder
:-(
Cheers
Francesco
Some of the inertia -- on my part
Tim Moore wrote:
One thing (perhaps the only thing) that was nice about keeping
aircraft in fgdata is that enforced synchronization between the
aircraft and other common nasal and instrument files. However, if they
are split out, maybe we will be forced to be more mature about
backward
Any news about a possible separation of aircrafts data from the fgdata
folder ?
I am afraid this topic is sligtly falling into the forget about it folder
:-(
Cheers
Francesco
--
BlackBerryreg; DevCon Americas, Oct.
On 25 Jun 2011, at 22:59, Alex Perry wrote:
. Does anybody know offhand how much trouble it would be for our
source code to have all loaders of aircraft files go through a library
that understands what a relative URL is? If we can cut that over,
anybody can develop and host an airplane
Alex
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Vivian Meazza
vivian.mea...@lineone.net wrote:
Personally, I don't see a value in offering HTTP per-file instead of
SVN per-directory, but others may do. Hence the discussion above.
The main problem right now is that Git cannot cope with the size
On 26 Jun 2011, at 07:17, James Turner wrote:
Code wise, I have about 30% of this prototyped - but not at a point where it
can be tested. Since it appears to be a hot topic, I am thinking i should
revisit it for 2.5 :)
I've tried to capture my current design/plans here:
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011 09:58:05 +0100, James wrote in message
91dd9863-f84a-4e33-a278-3d5f84ba7...@mac.com:
On 26 Jun 2011, at 07:17, James Turner wrote:
Code wise, I have about 30% of this prototyped - but not at a point
where it can be tested. Since it appears to be a hot topic, I am
James wrote
On 26 Jun 2011, at 07:17, James Turner wrote:
Code wise, I have about 30% of this prototyped - but not at a point
where it can be tested. Since it appears to be a hot topic, I am thinking
i should revisit it for 2.5 :)
I've tried to capture my current design/plans here:
As a general rule I'd propose to make a clear distinction between a)
datasets, b) hosting sites and c) protocols or revision control systems
(at least). Some people are implying SVN when talking about hosting
large datasets, others are implying Gitorious when talking about GIT.
Continuing this
On Sun, 26 Jun 2011, Martin Spott wrote:
As a general rule I'd propose to make a clear distinction between a)
datasets, b) hosting sites and c) protocols or revision control systems
(at least). Some people are implying SVN when talking about hosting
large datasets, others are implying
Hi,
Currently I do not even have a working fg on my machine, but I continue
to peek at the flightgear-devel list occasionally. Today I saw this
discussion of moving the aircraft directories to individual SVN repos
instead of git.
My experience with both svn and git is both minimal and old, and I
On Saturday 25 June 2011 12:28:14 David Slocombe wrote:
Hi,
Currently I do not even have a working fg on my machine, but I continue
to peek at the flightgear-devel list occasionally. Today I saw this
discussion of moving the aircraft directories to individual SVN repos
instead of git.
The
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 6:51 AM, Scott scott.hamil...@popplanet.biz wrote:
Using SVN so you can download stuff on the fly is ridiculous,
The most popular and platform agnostic way to do downloading from
multiple locations, with caching and automatic updates, is HTTP these
days. Does anybody
Putting map data on SVN made incremental updates feasible. Both for
maintainer uploads, and user caches. A similar argument applies to
the aircraft, with the complications that (a) there are more
maintainers with less coordination, and (b) the dependency graph
between directories is not trivial.
Alex wrote
Putting map data on SVN made incremental updates feasible. Both for
maintainer uploads, and user caches. A similar argument applies to
the aircraft, with the complications that (a) there are more
maintainers with less coordination, and (b) the dependency graph
between
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 4:01 PM, Vivian Meazza
vivian.mea...@lineone.net wrote:
Personally, I don't see a value in offering HTTP per-file instead of
SVN per-directory, but others may do. Hence the discussion above.
The main problem right now is that Git cannot cope with the size of the
data,
Ok, before I get flamed to a crisp, let me explain what is my reasoning behind
this. Right now the fgdata repository is about 9 GB. This makes it really,
really difficult to obtain an initial checkout of the fgdata folder, expecially
for people that do not have a very good connection. at the
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 10:48 +, TDO_Brandano - wrote:
Ok, before I get flamed to a crisp, let me explain what is my
reasoning behind this. Right now the fgdata repository is about 9 GB.
This makes it really, really difficult to obtain an initial checkout
of the fgdata folder, expecially for
Erik wrote
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 10:48 +, TDO_Brandano - wrote:
Ok, before I get flamed to a crisp, let me explain what is my
reasoning behind this. Right now the fgdata repository is about 9 GB.
This makes it really, really difficult to obtain an initial checkout
of the fgdata
2011/6/24 TDO_Brandano - tdo_brand...@hotmail.com
Ok, before I get flamed to a crisp, let me explain what is my reasoning
behind this. Right now the fgdata repository is about 9 GB. [...]
I agree with Brandano, airplanes data is way too big for git, and the
problem will only get worst with
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Vivian Meazza
vivian.mea...@lineone.net wrote:
Seriously, Git has never been right for the data. We were promised a fix,
which has never materialized. SVN can be no worse, and it might be better.
Terrasync indicates that it might well be better, and might give
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 15:20 +0200, Csaba Halász wrote:
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Vivian Meazza
vivian.mea...@lineone.net wrote:
Seriously, Git has never been right for the data. We were promised a fix,
which has never materialized. SVN can be no worse, and it might be better.
Csaba wrote
On Fri, Jun 24, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Vivian Meazza
vivian.mea...@lineone.net wrote:
Seriously, Git has never been right for the data. We were promised a
fix,
which has never materialized. SVN can be no worse, and it might be
better.
Terrasync indicates that it might well be
On Friday, June 24, 2011 05:19:58 AM Francesco Angelo Brisa wrote:
2011/6/24 TDO_Brandano - tdo_brand...@hotmail.com
Ok, before I get flamed to a crisp, let me explain what is my reasoning
behind this. Right now the fgdata repository is about 9 GB. [...]
I agree with Brandano,
Am 24.06.11 12:55, schrieb Erik Hofman:
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 10:48 +, TDO_Brandano - wrote:
Ok, before I get flamed to a crisp, let me explain what is my
reasoning behind this. Right now the fgdata repository is about 9 GB.
It has been proposed before and I believe it's the way to go.
: flightg...@sablonier.ch
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Proposal: Move airplanes to an SVN repository
Am 24.06.11 12:55, schrieb Erik Hofman:
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 10:48 +, TDO_Brandano - wrote:
Ok, before I get flamed to a crisp, let me explain what
: flightg...@sablonier.ch
To: flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [Flightgear-devel] Proposal: Move airplanes to an SVN
repository
Am 24.06.11 12:55, schrieb Erik Hofman:
On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 10:48 +, TDO_Brandano - wrote:
Ok, before I get flamed to a crisp, let me explain
37 matches
Mail list logo
