Hi Arnt,
Arnt Karlsen schrieb:
..in precisely that process, building a new GVAC Cape Verde out of
your VMap1 data and then KOSH, I am trying to get TerraGear built:
http://80.239.32.252/terrorgear.configure.fails , and post with
message-id: [EMAIL PROTECTED].
I'll try to have a look at
Hi all,
Problem: I have about 7 AI aircraft arriving at an airport at staggered
times... I want them to taxi off the runway - park and hold until all
aircraft haved handed and taxi-ed-. landing, taxi-ing, parking I think I
have sorted... any suggestions on how to make them hold?
Previous
Hi Dene,
It sounds like this would be a job for the traffic manager system, which
has more or less all the capabilities you describe (arrival, taxiway
following, wait until next flight, etc etc). I'll put some documentation
regarding the design of trafficmanager scripts once I'm back home (in
* Martin Spott -- Monday 05 June 2006 23:58:
Indeed, documentation is a weak point in the history of FlightGear
development. Guess why ? Because writing documentation that you can
rely on and which comes in a presentable outfit is unpleasant work,
That's not necessarily the reason why
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:57:43 +0200, Ralf wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Arnt,
Arnt Karlsen schrieb:
..in precisely that process, building a new GVAC Cape Verde out of
your VMap1 data and then KOSH, I am trying to get TerraGear built:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
That's not necessarily the reason why contributions are sparse: last
time I wanted to commit a minor documentation fix, I noticed that I
don't/didn't have commit permission for that module. I lost interest
after that and document my stuff in $FG_ROOT/Docs/.
Why don't
* Martin Spott -- Tuesday 06 June 2006 15:26:
Melchior FRANZ wrote:
I noticed that I don't/didn't have commit permission for that module.
Why don't you say a single word ? People are standing on your feet to
get their patches committed to main CVS, why don't you simply play the
same game ?
Here's a question for all you amateur lawyers and GPL experts out there.
Let's say that someone wants to create a proprietary aircraft within the
FlightGear system, and then distribute a larger system that includes
FlightGear + that aircraft.
In my view, the FlightGear GPL license covers our
I've now converted all font-using parts in fgfs to use the
font-cache. And while I was at it, I also made some fonts
configurable:
panel
-
Here only fonts typewriter and led could be used in the
past. Now all texture fonts ($FG_ROOT/Fonts/*.txf) can be used.
This may lead to wrong alignment
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Curtis L. Olson schrieb:
Here's a question for all you amateur lawyers and GPL experts out there.
INAL but your case looks to me like that that person wants to use FGFS
just as an (complex) viewer/interpreter program for his proprietary
content(*).
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 18:52, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Here's a question for all you amateur lawyers and GPL experts out there.
Let's say that someone wants to create a proprietary aircraft within the
FlightGear system, and then distribute a larger system that includes
FlightGear + that
Am Dienstag, den 06.06.2006, 19:48 +0200 schrieb Christian Mayer:
(*) I'm assuming that the proprietary aircraft doesn't derive of any
preexisting material (like textures) in FGFS.
This might become complex
with the cofiguration XML files as they must be written from scratch
IMHO.
But what
In my view, the FlightGear GPL license covers our source
code, but not content created with or used by that code
(except for things like the base package which is explicitely
licensed as GPL.)
In my mind, that is one reason why the approach taken by FlightGear and
associated projects lke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Oliver schrieb:
Am Dienstag, den 06.06.2006, 19:48 +0200 schrieb Christian Mayer:
(*) I'm assuming that the proprietary aircraft doesn't derive of any
preexisting material (like textures) in FGFS.
This might become complex
with the cofiguration
AJ MacLeod wrote:
On Monday 05 June 2006 20:25, Jakub Skibiński wrote:
I am newbie, so excuse my ignorance :)
We are all ignorant about something. Some of us are very ignorant about most
things :-)
Then I export my object to an '.ac' file and copy it into proper FG
scenery directory
Have to check the gpl.
Most address the issue of expansion of the code.
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 2:02 pm, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Here's a question for all you amateur lawyers and GPL experts out
there.
Let's say that someone wants to create a proprietary aircraft within
the
FlightGear system,
Am Sonntag, den 28.05.2006, 14:42 +0200 schrieb Martin Doege:
And since one of the major selling points of Flight Simulator X will
be, at least according to the screenshots and trailers, the more
realistic depiction of water in all its pixel shader-rendered glory,
it would be great if the
Hi Dene,
Just as well I said I would check :)
Here are the _correct_ figures for the Comper Swift fitted with
the Pobjoy R seven cylinder radial engine (as modelled)
Cruise: 120 mph (104.2 kt)
Max: 140 mph (121.6 kt)
Landing/Stall 40 mph (34 kt)
Not sure exactly what is meant by the
Thank you Durk that would be much appreciated I haven't really
investigated the traffic manager system so know very little about(read
nothing) about it. I have plenty left to do with regard way points and xml
wrappers for the models, plus scenery work... great opportunity to learn
more
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 17:52, Curtis L. Olson wrote:
Here's a question for all you amateur lawyers and GPL experts
out there.
Let's say that someone wants to create a proprietary aircraft
within the FlightGear system, and then distribute a larger
system that includes FlightGear + that
On Tuesday 06 June 2006 21:40, dene maxwell wrote:
Hi Dene,
Just as well I said I would check :)
Here are the _correct_ figures for the Comper Swift fitted
with the Pobjoy R seven cylinder radial engine (as modelled)
Cruise: 120 mph (104.2 kt)
Max: 140 mph (121.6 kt)
Landing/Stall
On Tue, 6 Jun 2006 15:17:44 +0200, Arnt wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 06 Jun 2006 11:57:43 +0200, Ralf wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Arnt,
Arnt Karlsen schrieb:
..in precisely that process, building a new GVAC Cape Verde out of
your VMap1 data and
Lee Elliott wrote:
lowest I dared stall? Like he had a choice?
Josh
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/flightgear-devel
23 matches
Mail list logo
