If its any help , the error message pops up the instant the gps dialog is
opened.The dialog seems to work regardless , so Im not sure what the
problem is.
Syd
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 1:20 PM, syd adams wrote:
> No , Im not sure what caused the segfault... but the error message appears
>
front
of me , but i was sure the gps deflection range was 5 nm.
Syd
On Wed, Oct 9, 2013 at 4:21 AM, Dirk Dittmann
wrote:
> I will search for that. allways a segfault ? fg crash ?
>
>
>
> 2013/10/9 syd adams
>
>> Not sure what went wrong but i get this error consistently
Not sure what went wrong but i get this error consistently now:
Nasal runtime error: props.setValue() with non-number
at /media/FG/fgdata/Nasal/props.nas, line 29
called from: __dlg:gps, line 20
called from: __dlg:gps, line 134
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
On Fri, Oct 4, 2013 at 1:48
Tried this out myself . A work of art ! I agree this should be one of the
default aircraft.
On Sat, Sep 21, 2013 at 3:48 PM, James Turner wrote:
>
> On 20 Sep 2013, at 22:16, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>
> Possible candidate for default aircraft for V3.0?
>
>
> Just had a quick flight around the B
No one else has mentioned this so maybe its time for a make clean , but
this is what Im seeing after the recent tree updates :
http://imagebin.org/261806
--
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Sto
>
> Well then the problem cannot be as large as it looks like since ALS does
> not
> cause any of those.
>
>
Yes it does .My framerates drop to about 10 fps with ALS.But luckily no one
has yet said "Oh this is pretty , lets enable it by default!".
I can still use Flightgear quite nicely on the lega
Just thought I'd mention that README-textures-ng states that dds textures
can be enabled with :
--prop:/sim/rendering/materials-file=materials-dds.xml.
The correct line is :
--prop:/sim/rendering/materials-file=/Materials/dds/materials.xml.
Syd
--
Ive been thinking about this since since you posted, and now i'm curious to
see it.My initial fear was more framerate drop, but if it can be truly
disabled I think its worth a try.Currently I can disable shaders and get
decent performance , 30-40 fps , which makes a flight doable.I do keep
trees on
Feedback welcome as always, though I suspect almost everyone these
days is using Advanced Weather...
No ,Advanced weather forced 3d clouds on me even when i disable 3d clouds
so i don't use it.
Of course i could be doing something wrong , but Im not quite convinced yet
to get a new computer.
Looks
I'd say no , its easy enough to do without yet another shader, since each
new shader 'improvement" has me tweaking my aircraft
to get back the frame rates I lost.But thanks for offering.
Syd
On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Renk Thorsten wrote:
>
> I have a question to aircraft/cockpit modeller
Thanks .I've redone most of the b1900d flight deck and have a question
about the knob animation.Can the object rotation be skipped in some cases?
Im still looking through the code for answers and probably didn't see
it.Keep up the good work .
Syd
On Sat, Apr 13, 2013 at 7:42 AM, James Turner wro
If this is any help , it appears that one of the objects disappears if
there are multiple objects in the pick animation.
Will continue testing .
Syd
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 3:17 PM, James Turner wrote:
>
>
> On 12 Apr 2013, at 20:11, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
>
> > On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 6:01 PM
sleep I'll probably discover what I'm doing wrong :)
Syd
On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 8:47 AM, James Turner wrote:
>
> On 12 Apr 2013, at 15:33, syd adams wrote:
>
> > I've apparently missed something... I cant right-drag , how do i enable
> that ? Knob actions work
I've apparently missed something... I cant right-drag , how do i enable
that ? Knob actions work fine so I'm adding this feature
to the b1900d since I'm overhauling it anyway.I also get the same nasal
error that Stuart mentioned.
Oh , and tooltips don't appear for me .Ive got a few days off now , s
Sounds like a definite improvement! I'll try it out when i get off work.oh
,and im a mouse flyer,i dont find a joystick appropriate for the type of
aircraft i like to fly.one day i'll invest in a yoke,pedals and maybe even
a throttle setup.
On Apr 11, 2013 2:49 AM, "James Turner" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just for reference about how to test.
> Following advice in
> http://code.google.com/p/flightgear-bugs/issues/detail?id=284#c66
> , I launched "process monitor" from Microsoft, watched file access of
> fgrun when dhc2 was selected, and then I got following results:
> C:\Program
> Files\FlightGear
I will check that, thanks for the reminder
Syd
On Mar 11, 2013 8:40 AM, "Nigel Mackay" wrote:
>
> Syd, before you commit your changes, can you check why
> 'orientation/side-slip-deg' (and -rad) don't budge from 0? At least,
> they don't with me, and they do with other aircraft.
>
> macnab
>
>
>
-
Thanks for the patches , but ive redesigned the cockpit and gauges so
these dont apply . I'll try to commit the changes soon.
Syd
On Sun, Mar 10, 2013 at 6:47 AM, Cristian Marchi wrote:
> I've collected some patches for the Beechcraft 1900d. I've also sent some to
> Sy
I cant use the shaders ,and prefer not to use that one anyway... so
please dont remove the snow textures.
The nicest thing about flightgear is I can turn off all the 'extras' ,
and get great framerates. Cant say that about my current install of
Xplane 10.
On Wed, Jan 30, 2013 at 6:14 PM, Arnt Kar
Hi guys, after an update yesterday I have no sound in
flightgear.Anyone else run into this ?
All other applications work fine . The sound configuration menu shows
my ALSA default , and the usual HW outputs , Sb and HDMI,
but none appear to work.
Cheers,
Syd
Thank you.Im currently upgrading the flightdeck and will add this fix.
Syd
On Mon, Nov 12, 2012 at 4:49 AM, Nigel Mackay wrote:
> I have made a few changes to the gps-nav tutorial for the b1900d. Mostly
> typos.
>
> Macnab
>
> --
would any of these changes have affected the Equipment/map performance
? I get a lot of disc activity now while panning the map ... and it
takes 10 -15 seconds now before it refreshes , and thats with every
mouse drag.This only used to happen when zooming out , and the refresh
time was much shorter
. If it was up to me, they'd
> be tightly wrapped in wet leather and left in the hot sun as an example to
> others considering similar things.
>
I'd be more than happy to assist you with that.
Syd
--
Live Security Virtua
Im running Ubuntu , still get that problem.I've added the radar to my
intrumentation file in my affected aircraft , and the problem is
gone.Strange.
Syd
On Mon, Sep 3, 2012 at 2:23 AM, Alasdair wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-09-03 at 01:06 +0200, ThorstenB wrote:
>> > On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 11:31 AM, Alas
Ive had this same issue for months now , on a laptop with ATI Mobility
Radeon HD 4250.It only happens on some aircraft , but i havent really
tried to hunt the problem down. Im suspecting a shortage of video
memory . I also can get full screen by changing the window size , but
any dialog or text on
Hi all .
Before the next release , maybe it would be a good idea to disable
those 'panel' outlines , which show up when you press 'C' to view
hotspots.
They are not exactly accurate ,as far as positioning , and probably
would be a bit confusing to most users.
Was there a purpose behind displaying t
. Indeed I would prefer to
> make it visible for all views (at the moment the panel is only visible in
> forward-view direction). I think such a behavior could be an advantage over
> the 3D panels.
>
>
> I think there's already a property (and if not I can trivially add one) to
> control this behav
On Sun, Jun 17, 2012 at 6:22 AM, Kleo G. wrote:
> I found what's causing the freeze! It's the landmass shader. Disabling it in
> the "rendering" window I have no system freezes at all!
> I don't know if it's only my system or if there are other users experiencing
> this, yet if you need further in
hi all.
I updated the Citation-II to use model-combined-deferred , but it
originally used reflect.eff.Try as i might i cant seem to get the
reflectmap section to work.Is this a bug? Ive tried greymaps and alpha
maps but see no effect . I get a constant environment reflection over
all.
Syd
Thought I'd show the state of rembrandt here .This is on an Acer
Aspire laptop with ATI Mobility Radeon HD4250 graphics...
and Ive heard that this current Ubuntu fglrx driver is buggy , but
haven't successfully installed the latest driver from AMD ...
maybe its time to go back to a desktop setup ,
These are the errors I get with Rembrandt enabled :
FRAGMENT glCompileShader
"/home/syd/FG/fgdata/Shaders/ubershader-gbuffer.frag" FAILED
FRAGMENT Shader "/home/syd/FG/fgdata/Shaders/ubershader-gbuffer.frag" infolog:
Fragment shader failed to compile with the following errors:
ERROR: 0:79: error(
able to figure out your fixes to apply to the as yet
uncommited ones.
Thanks for the help.
Syd
On Sat, Jun 9, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Stuart Buchanan wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 1:59 AM, syd adams wrote:
>> I didn't think it harsh myself , but from my point of view , I'd
>>
> Rembrandt has been around for quite a few months now,
> and the changes required to make an aircraft Rembrandt-compatible are
> pretty small, even if the changes to add proper lights are more involved.
>
> If I was being harsh I'd suggest that the aircraft maintainers should
> "man up and do it".
>
> So, just to get this out of the way, some benchmark tests. As you have
> probably discovered by now, elseif isn't valid syntax and leads to a parse
> error, so my 427 instances of using it are trivial to justify :-)
just a quick note to this interesting thread ...
its elsif in nasal , not el
Oops , my mistake . I had commented out the for the dhc6.
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and
threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond
Hi guys,
Is it just me or has the model-combined shader stopped reflecting ?
Moving the model slider seems to have no effect now .
Syd
--
Live Security Virtual Conference
Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today'
Im assuming my crash is related, but it only happens when i open the
route-manager dialog...
Syd
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 10:24 AM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 11:09 AM, James Turner wrote:
>>
>>
>> As far as the FGPositioned Octree is concerned (which is what findClosest
>> use
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 3:16 AM, James Turner wrote:
>
> On 22 Apr 2012, at 03:14, Flightgear-commitlogs wrote:
>
>> Bravo updates.changed map range select;property-cycle too buggy
>
> Something to be fixed here?
>
> (In a backwards compatible way...)
>
> James
>
>
> ---
OK , took awhile , but discovered this was a yasim error.
Trying to add several vstab objects caused it to fail for some reason
, though the only indication was the FGFS crash .
Syd
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 11:56 AM, ThorstenB wrote:
> Am 12.04.2012 16:50, schrieb syd adams:
>>
Hi folks,
I've been updating the CitationX , and suddenly Im getting this error
and the program segfaults.
calc_bearing is not a finite number : Speed nanpos : nan, nanwaypoint
43.8071, 11.2006
waypoint name rotateSegmentation fault
I've been trying for days to figure out what I changed to cause
>
> I assume that users complaining about ugly models is the only means to
> make many of the modellers fix their stuff.
>
> Cheers,
> Martin.
True :). Although it would be a great help to know what needs changing
... apparently I've missed an email.
At the moment rembrandt is unusable for
>
> I've been on a short vacation for the first time in 10 years and have to
> catch up on everything, but I believe this was solved, wasn't it?
>
> Erik
Hope you had a good vacation.
Its sort of solved ,but I still haven't managed to get some sounds to
smoothly fade to 0 , i can
still hear them
Thanks for the explanation , that helped. I thought the volume was
reduced to half at reference-distance , but after more experiments
discovered that the volume IS cutting off at max-dist , but the
reference distances were excessive , so it turns out to be my
misunderstanding and old sound configur
Hi guys,
I,ve noticed for awhile that sounds seem to cut off at the
reference-distance rather than max-dist.
Is there a new way to do the sound files that Ive missed or is this a bug ?
It is nice that sounds actually stop now , but I must be doing
something wrong .I've been attempting to fix all my
ah the golfcourse winter texture is there , just misnamed in the
material.xml file
On Sat, Mar 17, 2012 at 3:20 PM, syd adams wrote:
> Looks like some i missed.I converted most of the textures to winter
> versions long ago,and cant remember if I just missed those or they
> didn'
Looks like some i missed.I converted most of the textures to winter
versions long ago,and cant remember if I just missed those or they
didn't exist at the time.I see a sand.png, maybe it would make more
sense to change the material.xml file to use that one sand.png texture
for winter scenes. I can
ion is on) by changing the factor
> property. Setting the factor property to zero does not move the rudder,
> even if auto-coordination is on.
>
> Long message for something that simple, just give it a try ;-)
>
> FG and FGDATA pull required!
>
> Torsten
>
> Am 10.03.2
haven't had your morning coffee yet ? ;)
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePoint, SQL - plus HTML
und an appropriate location. And I think /controls just fits
> better than "don't know where, so put it in /sim". Objections?
> I'll take care of the wrightFlyer1903, the pa22, the waveXtreme150, the
> Saitek X52 and the bintest protocol in FGDATA and adjust the names
&g
> On the subject of novices, would it be a good idea to have an idiot-startup
> button or menu, which makes everything all systems go and ready to take off?
>
> Alan
Mine already have such a button , in the menu called "autostart'.
ah overlooked that , thanks
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 2:07 PM, ThorstenB wrote:
> Am 09.03.2012 21:46, schrieb syd adams:
>> Hmmm another thought . Wouldn't setting that value to 0.0 still force
>> the rudder to center , still overriding other systems ?
>
> No, since
Hmmm another thought . Wouldn't setting that value to 0.0 still force
the rudder to center , still overriding other systems ?
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:39 PM, Anders Gidenstam
wrote:
> On Fri, 9 Mar 2012, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
>
>> Currently the rudder is set to 0.5 * aileron if autocoordination i
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Gijs de Rooy wrote:
>> Curt wrote:
>> I am sure there are very few (if any?) real life aircraft rigged in such a
>> way.
>
> There are also very vew (if any?) real life aircraft flown by mouse :-)
or flown looking through a monitor , using a keyboard :P
>
> Altoug
Now that sounds like an even better idea.Less chance of breaking
anything , but still adjustable.Thanks Torsten.
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 1:32 PM, Torsten Dreyer wrote:
> Am 09.03.2012 20:44, schrieb syd adams:
>> Ok I haven't entirely given up on the idea of removing the
>> au
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Renk Thorsten wrote:
>> Ok I haven't entirely given up on the idea of removing the
>> auto-coordination from the code.
>
> Why?
>
because its hard-coded...
>> Wouldn't it be more appropriate to add
>> that rudder control to controls.nas?
>
> Nasal runs per graphic
Ok I haven't entirely given up on the idea of removing the
auto-coordination from the code.Wouldn't it be more appropriate to add
that rudder control to controls.nas?
Then it can be replaced if need be on a per aircraft basis , but not
break anything
otherwise.And maybe it could be slip/skid-ball d
On Fri, Mar 9, 2012 at 4:28 AM, Martin Spott wrote:
> syd adams wrote:
>
>> Actually I'd prefer the auto-coordination property to remain , and the
>> options to enable it too , just that it be handled in an autopilot
>> file rather than hard-coded.
>
> I'm
OK ,I was just gathering opinions , and it appears it should stay.Now
I know how to proceed.
Thanks guys.
Syd
--
Virtualization & Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization - but c
On Thu, Mar 8, 2012 at 10:19 PM, Curtis Olson wrote:
> Hi Syd,
>
> That was a hack from the very early days of the project, so if it went away,
> it wouldn't bother me. Fred might have a check box in the window launcher,
> and there may be a command line option or property value to hunt down and
Hi folks,
Ran into a little problem just recently.
I was informed on IRC that auto-coordination broke autopilot behavior
and eventually it went out of control.
I admit I never thought about it before , I've never used it , even
with a mouse as my only controller .
I could add a check every time aut
>
> Aerostar 700:
> * The airspeed indicator looks like to be a default one (With no colored
> bars for velocities). is this due to the fact that it is as in the real
> aircraft or just because nobody worked on it ?
>
>
Looks like an oversight on my part. The instruments for the Aerostar are in
its
Thanks for the input , they reflect my own feeling ... I'm more
comfortable using the WMS data.
I did contact NAV CANADA long go about using the aerodrome charts.The
response seemed to be that they would happy to discuss licencing fees
, but i think i was misunderstood .
That ended the subject for
My source of info is here.
http://www.navcanada.ca/NavCanada.asp?Language=en&Content=ContentDefinitionFiles%5CPublications%5CAeronauticalInfoProducts%5CCanadianAirportCharts%5Cdefault.xml
I also own the Canadian Flight Supplimental book purchased during
flight training, which contains all the chart
This discussion about scenery reminded me of a few things , one of
them is me not understanding what Martin is working towards...I
probably should pay closer attention .Sorry Martin.
I've been very interested in seeing an improvement in scenery , but i
think covering it up with shaders is the wrong
yes my mistake i misread a name. My point was that the whole argument
was about getting permission , and it seemed a little one-sided.
All the aircraft in that hangar are someone else original work.And I
dont have a problem with that, just the basis of the argument.
Yes the 'its GPL so i can do wh
For what its worth , I see several of my aircraft in this hangar and I
wasn't asked permission for that so sounds like a ridiculous
argument from the start . This team should others as they wish to be
treated .Good place to end the discussion.
This is exaclty the kind of BS i was hoping we wouldnt see !
--
Try before you buy = See our experts in action!
The most comprehensive online learning library for Microsoft developers
is just $99.99! Visual Studio, SharePo
Clément ,Not trying to start a flame war , but you modified someone
else's work , so this sounds a bit odd , but i do understand your
point .Ive seen a lot of things Ive modelled end up in other's
'original' work , but i've also borrowed nasal scripts and ideas from
others so I can't complain .I ag
>
>>* dhc6: Nice to see more details in the cockpit. Just, how the hell do I
>>switch all the warning signs off? After starting the engines, the whole
>>warning panel lit up (which I know from some other aircraft as a test
>>mode), but the lights never went out. Plane was flying fine though.
>
> Lo
no its a bug , Im still trying to tune that . GS hold is still pretty
unstable , but Im hoping to have it better soon , I just get pulled
off to other projects too easily.
On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 12:33 PM, Heiko Schulz wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I updated my FGdata today, and wow- the Citation X has impr
> * dhc6: Nice to see more details in the cockpit. Just, how the hell do I
> switch all the warning signs off? After starting the engines, the whole
> warning panel lit up (which I know from some other aircraft as a test
> mode), but the lights never went out. Plane was flying fine though.
I dont
I'd suggest converting the sound files the s76c is fixed here ,
just not commited yet due to some other half finished changes. Most
files seem to just get copied from aircraft to aircraft , so the
problem will probably continue to grow.
oops , another case of me opening mouth and inserting foot ... all the
sound clips in /fgdata/Sound are correct ... turns out to be my own
sounds causing the problem ;)
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 5:46 PM, syd adams wrote:
> As stated in Docs/README.xmlsound ,
> The volume calculation
As stated in Docs/README.xmlsound ,
The volume calculation due to distance and orientation of the
sounds source ONLY work on mono samples!
I imagine that hasn't change over the years , and a stereo sound
originating from a point in 3d space
doesn't make much sense anyway . More care just ne
I like the idea , especially if it works as well as the trees.Looking
forward to seeing this .
--
All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure
contains a definitive record of customers, application perfor
I'm also in favor of this move trees had barely any effect on
framerate here , before being added to shaders.3d clouds are
managable. Water reflection never had much impact (until my last
update) , but i understand that its a work in progress...
Enabling land-mass and transition effects will f
thanks for the heads up ... Im currently updating the CitationX so
i'll fix that and check my other aircraft.
You said fgdata , does that mean aircraft are back in fgdata ?Is the
separation idea abandoned for now? Just asking so i know how to
proceed , since im updating mine in the FG-Aircraft repo
Oops , spoke too soon :)
/home/syd/FG/flightgear/src/Scenery/tilemgr.cxx: In member function
‘virtual osg::Node* FGTileMgr::loadTileModel(const std::string&,
bool)’:
/home/syd/FG/flightgear/src/Scenery/tilemgr.cxx:279:17: error:
‘loadDeferedModel’ is not a member of ‘simgear::SGModelLib’
make[2]:
editing.Thanks for the tips guys.
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 2:44 PM, syd adams wrote:
> Im on linux , not windows . Im about to try again , and since i know
> nothing about Cmake files i may be hand editing it wrong ... or
> possibly putting the variables in the wrong place ... I'
Im on linux , not windows . Im about to try again , and since i know
nothing about Cmake files i may be hand editing it wrong ... or
possibly putting the variables in the wrong place ... I'll post if Im
successful.
Cheers
On Wed, Nov 9, 2011 at 7:47 AM, James Turner wrote:
>
> On 9 Nov 2011, at 0
Hi
Ive been trying to build flightgear with ccmake , no luck yet.
The first error was SIMGEAR_VERSION_OK not found , but with some help on irc,
I managed to get past this by adding set(SIMGEAR_VERSION_OK 1) to the
CMakeLists.txt.
Now i get these error messages :
WARNING: Target "fgfs" requests lin
Oh good. I figured someone would be way ahead of me :)
Cheers
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 11:32 AM, James Turner wrote:
>
> On 25 Oct 2011, at 14:30, syd adams wrote:
>
>> I haven't thought it out too deeply , but
>> maybe in this format :
>>
>> Aircraft: Cit
I dont personally see any advantage myself, I'd have to vote no.Sorry Yves.
--
The demand for IT networking professionals continues to grow, and the
demand for specialized networking skills is growing even more rapidly.
Ta
Hi . Though it appears to have it's drawbacks , from a selfish point
of view ,the split makes work here much easier. Thanks again.
Just another (possibly useless) idea . What about adding a text/xml
file of all available aircraft , or even an aircraft.dat
file,somewhere in fgdata? I haven't thought
Im still not sleeping , so thanks for clearing things up. I for one
like the aircraft split , just awaiting the require permissions.Will
be nice to get my own work up to date without risking breaking
something elsewhere in fgdata .
Cheers
On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 5:42 AM, James Turner wrote:
>
> O
Just to add my own 2 cents while the central repository is a fine
idea , after the move to git , I lost any commit rights to my own
work, so after a time i gave up on the idea of maintaining them and
started my own repositories . I would have happily continued to
maintain/upgrade them , and I,
Me too , with ATIMobility Radeon HD 4250
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:55 AM, wrote:
> On Friday 07 October 2011 19:38:54 Durk Talsma wrote:
>
>> On 07 Oct 2011, at 19:01, Frederic Bouvier wrote:
>
>> > "Me too" on the black clouds now ... nvidia graphics card + latest git.
>
>> >
>
>> > It's the sa
Ok , i didnt realize autothrottle was taking over... and yes the
CitationX has no autothrottle .Im in the process of fixing these
issues.I probably borrowed an autopilot file to adapt for the Citation
and didnt clean it up. I dont think I understood how the FLC mode
worked at the time either , but
I did a DESCEND/CLIMB mode for the b1900d autopilot , and a few others
that i never did commit , but have to admit I'm not sure what you mean
by decoupling the throttle ... is there a controller in the autopilot
file that's taking control of the throttle at the same time ?My
apologies if this soun
Another plus is I can work on my projects without risking other parts
... I already have several repositories on the go , I can set up the
rest if that will help the process, but may need coaching if it means
I need to do some extra things to 'link' them to fgdata/Aircraft...
Thanks for tackling th
due to the light weight of the aircraft. The approach speed has a
large impact on this problem , and reducing the approach speed to 25
helped a little.I've also had this problem with ultralights Ive
modelled , and applying brake made it worse. I,m still working on the
gear problem , if i fin
Hi ,
It's been ages since i looked at this one again , I see it's in
serious need of an update (still uses panel style hotspots)!
and fuel management needs to be brought up to date anyway ,
Going back over the files , i see i used controls/electric/key to
manage the magnetos / starter .
I'm p
Oh good, then I didn't break it :)
Cheers
2011/8/8 Mathias Fröhlich :
>
> Hi,
>
> On Tuesday, August 09, 2011 02:30:18 syd adams wrote:
>> After a git pull and recompile of fgdata , flightgear and simgear
>> today , it seems that fly-by view is broken . Were there
After a git pull and recompile of fgdata , flightgear and simgear
today , it seems that fly-by view is broken . Were there any recent
changes to the nasal geo.* functions ? Just guessing here , I cant
tell if the camera viewpoint is really high or low ... . Anyone else
seeing this or did i break so
Its in the property tree , you can open the property browser and
change the value there , or you could add it to the -set.xml file like
i do:
true
--
BlackBerry® DevCon Americas, Oct. 18-20, San Francisco, CA
The must
Set /sim/allow-toggle-cockpit to 'true' , then press 'c'
2011/8/7 金承德 :
> Does Flightgear have any view like that? I have reference some one press "c"
> to turn off the panel, but it is not effect in default cessna
>
> -邮件原件-
> 发件人: Martin Spott [mailto:martin.sp...@mgras.net]
> 发送时间: 2011
Sounds logical to me ...the double weather systems are a bit of
nuisance , would be nicer, in my opinion , if they could be combined
in a single dialog but not sure if that's possible.I use real
world weather anyway , so i never use those settings.
Cheers
On Sat, Jul 9, 2011 at 12:57 PM, Stua
Try this:
var myTempNode = props.globals.initNode("/sim/temp/TempNode", 50,"INT");
myTempNode.setValue(getprop("instrumentation[0]/altimeter/indicated-altitude-ft"));
> The code i am using
> var myTempNode = props.globals.getNode("/sim/temp/TempNode", 1,);
remove comma at the end.
> my
Didn't mean to branch the topic , was just curious .And thanks for the
replies Jon and Hal.
Ron Jensen has patiently tried coaching me with jsbsim , but I'm a
slow learner ;)
My apologies xsaint , hope you got the answer you were looking for.
Cheers
--
On the other hand, YASim does not take into the wing downwash
> or the propwash while computing the tail incidence (while they are
> first order contributors) so I would not use the word 'fidelity'.
Does jsbsim ? I've just begun to look into it , so I don't really know
jsbsim's capabilities.
Che
1 - 100 of 441 matches
Mail list logo
