Erik Hofman wrote
> Martin Spott wrote:
> > "Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
> >
> >>I could also wish a few things.
> >>
> >>1. That we treat everyone with respect.
> >
> > Yes please, with no exception!!
> > The logical consequence would be that you (and maybe Arthur as well)
> > give a _credible_ signa
Martin Spott wrote:
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
I could also wish a few things.
1. That we treat everyone with respect.
Yes please, with no exception!!
The logical consequence would be that you (and maybe Arthur as well)
give a _credible_ signal to us that you respect our faith as much as
yours - inst
"Curtis L. Olson" wrote:
> I could also wish a few things.
>
> 1. That we treat everyone with respect.
Yes please, with no exception!!
The logical consequence would be that you (and maybe Arthur as well)
give a _credible_ signal to us that you respect our faith as much as
yours - instead of divi
Arthur Wiebe wrote:
That may a good idea.
But just so you all know and so you'll hopefully calm down, the file
has been removed from the distribution although there is still "a note
from the packager" and future releases will not even have that.
Arthur,
Thanks, and thanks for all your efforts to
That may a good idea.
But just so you all know and so you'll hopefully calm down, the file
has been removed from the distribution although there is still "a note
from the packager" and future releases will not even have that.
So please forget this whole thing, because if you don't I'll post the
e
Perhaps it will be a good idea to put up a notice that says "FlightGear is not
responsible for the contents of external websites".
Ampere
___
Flightgear-devel mailing list
Flightgear-devel@flightgear.org
http://mail.flightgear.org/mailman/listinfo/flig
"I hereby formally object ..."
It is a matter of great regret that such things could, and can, happen in the
public domain community.
I might try to persuade you to reconsider on the following grounds:-
1.Everyone has the right to free speech (within certain limits and the law).
2.Flightgear do
Curtis L. Olson wrote:
4. If complaints are being registered by non-mac users, they can't
actually see what's in the file either so their objections are likely to
be a bit suspect.
A bit of context - the first I heard about this was not on the mailing
list, but when a user popped into the IRC ch
Jonathan Polley wrote:
On Saturday, January 22, 2005, at 09:27AM, Curtis L. Olson <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]> wrote:
Let's not lose sight of a couple facts:
1. This is all regarding the Mac OS X package.
2. The author has already agreed to make some changes to his package.
3. This package is distribute
On Saturday, January 22, 2005, at 09:27AM, Curtis L. Olson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
>
>Let's not lose sight of a couple facts:
>
>1. This is all regarding the Mac OS X package.
>2. The author has already agreed to make some changes to his package.
>3. This package is distributed on a source
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:43:13 +0200, Paul Surgeon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I say pull the package in question. If the author wants to distribute it on
> his own site then that is fine with me but as it stands it looks like we
> endorse what is in that package.
> I'd rather upset one contributor
On Sat, 22 Jan 2005 16:43:13 +0200, Paul wrote in message
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:01, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> > I hereby formally object to my name and my code contributions being
> > dragged into potential religious conflicts, and to using them for
> > proselytizin
Paul Surgeon wrote:
On Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:01, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
I hereby formally object to my name and my code contributions being dragged
into potential religious conflicts, and to using them for proselytizing
purposes.
It's sad to see that the repeated calls for keeping politica
On Saturday, 22 January 2005 13:01, Melchior FRANZ wrote:
> I hereby formally object to my name and my code contributions being dragged
> into potential religious conflicts, and to using them for proselytizing
> purposes.
>
> It's sad to see that the repeated calls for keeping political and other
>
I hereby formally object to my name and my code contributions being dragged into
potential religious conflicts, and to using them for proselytizing purposes.
It's sad to see that the repeated calls for keeping political and other
controversial stuff off FlightGear don't seem to apply any more.
P
15 matches
Mail list logo
