Am Samstag, den 25.02.2012, 22:32 +0100 schrieb HB-GRAL:
Another example id livery and logos..
eg an airline that is defunct or BritishArwys as and exmaple..
Now their logo is their copyright..
Sorry I can not say anything about trademarks.
Cheers, Yves
In my opinion using trademarks
Am Sonntag, den 26.02.2012, 02:26 +0200 schrieb Stefan Gofferje:
This was specifically an answer to Kreuzritter's suggestion to remove
all links to custom scenery from all official FG websites to force
people to create scenery for the central database.
I would consider this kinda
Mathias Fröhlich wrote:
Anyway, I hope you enjoy your life, family and children and I am looking
forward to meet you again!
Sure I think there's still a bottle of French wine left from your
last visit ;-)
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its
HB-GRAL wrote:
Proposal for a first small meeting at #fg_scenery channel, this weekend:
I tried to join for logging the session (in order to determine wether
there are any open questions regarding the Scenemodels/MapServer
infrastructure), but it seems I'm the only user there. Right ?
Am 26.02.12 17:03, schrieb Martin Spott:
HB-GRAL wrote:
Proposal for a first small meeting at #fg_scenery channel, this weekend:
I tried to join for logging the session (in order to determine wether
there are any open questions regarding the Scenemodels/MapServer
infrastructure), but it
HB-GRAL wrote:
irc.flightgear.org
irc.flightgear.org != irc.freenode.net ???
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just selective about who its friends are !
--
No, for a user it matters if he has to download a scenery from one place
or from many partly incompatible scenerys scattered around the internet.
Sorry, but being also a user I can tell you that it doesn't matter to me.
And I'm pretty sure, a lot of others users as well!
I fact, I have to say
On 02/24/2012 02:35 PM, kreuzritter2000 wrote:
In my opinion a key for success of 1.) is to NOT promote individual
scenery projects on the official FlightGear places.
So i suggest to remove all urls that do link to such individual scenery
projects from the FlightGear website, the wiki and
Yves wrote:
Proposal for a first small meeting at #fg_scenery channel, this weekend:
http://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=IRC+Meeting+%40+%23fg_sceneryiso=20120226T17p1=945ah=1
Won't be able to be there :(
Rest of the week should be fine though...
Martin,
It's sad to hear that this central scenery database should have failed.
I never cared myself much about how our scenery is built.
This is just because all my interrests and work are in completely different
corners of this project. So concentrating on other corners than scenery can
Stefan Gofferje wrote:
I think, the licensing issue is maybe a bigger point than it's being
given credit for. It seems to be very hard to create really pretty
scenery which is GPL compatible. I'm not uptodate, but I remember
something about e.g. CORINE being not GPL-compatible.
This has
Am 25.02.12 14:28, schrieb Stefan Gofferje:
Now we are back to what people are interested in... If I think about
myself personally, if I would go through the hassle of compiling and
learning to handle this monster Terragear, I would do it to create the
best possible VFR scenery for Western
HB-GRAL wrote:
Where have you been looking for? I can provide you some GPL compliant
data when it is necessary. Just send me a note or ask at the forum.
While you're at it: I saw several places where people were claiming
CGIAR SRTM to be GPL compilant. Unless you're having ecplicit written
Am 25.02.12 21:38, schrieb Martin Spott:
HB-GRAL wrote:
Where have you been looking for? I can provide you some GPL compliant
data when it is necessary. Just send me a note or ask at the forum.
While you're at it: I saw several places where people were claiming
CGIAR SRTM to be GPL
Can I ask a Muppet Question.. ??
copyright is always owned by authority of nav data..
eg caa, nats, eurocontrol..
So this data is theirs but were allowed to use
Another example id livery and logos..
eg an airline that is defunct or BritishArwys as and exmaple..
Now their logo is their
Hi Pete
Am 25.02.12 22:12, schrieb Pedro Morgan:
Can I ask a Muppet Question.. ??
copyright is always owned by authority of nav data..
eg caa, nats, eurocontrol..
There are many different ways handling this data, by each region. FAA
i.e. puts a lot of data into public domain, that is
So its a typical data distribution problem..
This is easy to solve.. with a few participants and testers..
pedro
On Sat, Feb 25, 2012 at 9:32 PM, HB-GRAL flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote:
Hi Pete
Am 25.02.12 22:12, schrieb Pedro Morgan:
Can I ask a Muppet Question.. ??
copyright is always
Hi Martin,
I have no idea about the technical part you are doing behind the scenes to
provide us a world in FG. But it's a fact, no world in FG, would make the
rest useless. Terrasync and it's idea is somethings that have made FG
stronger! All those who use it know the fabulous advantage it
On Sat, 25 Feb 2012, Pedro Morgan wrote:
Can I ask a Muppet Question.. ??
copyright is always owned by authority of nav data..
eg caa, nats, eurocontrol..
So this data is theirs but were allowed to use
Another example id livery and logos..
eg an airline that is defunct or BritishArwys as
Hi,
On 02/25/2012 10:22 PM, HB-GRAL wrote:
What are you waiting, go for it! When I can help to keep the monster
small, I will try to do it. From my experience building scenery I would
say ... building Western Finland in a good matter will take approximate
six months when you’re fast (while
On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 22:21 +, Martin Spott wrote:
Those who relied on me to continue what I've done so far I kindly ask
to bear with me, because I reached the point where I have to apply a
measure of self protection
I think we've all reached that point at some time and it's good
From my perspective the really relevant paragraph in my posting is this
one:
Martin Spott wrote:
The idea I had in mind, the motivation which drove me into dedicating
so many hours was to focus as many of the available ressources as
possible on building the best _common_ Scenery we could make
Pedro Morgan wrote:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.netwrote:
In the mid of the last decade I've been one of those who realized that
developing a long-term strategy for the various FlightGear Scenery
ressources would be a Really Good Idea. Meanwhile there's
I really hope that we can start a discussion now about the state of
the scenery and making (or following) some plans keeping the basic
ideas up for the moment, also looking to planned improvements. I am
following Martins ideas since a long time. I always tried to help here
and there but
Am Freitag, den 24.02.2012, 09:41 + schrieb Martin Spott:
From my perspective the really relevant paragraph in my posting is this
one:
Basically I see two different approaches in FlightGear Scenery world
(aside from a few minor blends):
1.) Focus all ressources on one common World
Hi all, and especially Martin,
first of all let me say that I completely respect your decision. I'm sure,
knowing you're way of decision making, that you've
been thinking it over for a while.
Without trying to change your opinion, I do like to give you my view on the
scenery issue.
Hi Martin,
I sent you yesterday some new scenery models to add and I haven't paid
attention to the emails on fg mailing list... For one year I'm working
as a scenery modeler, I didn't know all the problems you met, and I'm
deeply sorry for being so ignorant.
As a FG user, I really support the
Hi Martin,
I sent you yesterday some new scenery models to add and I haven't paid
attention to the emails on fg mailing list... For one year I'm working
as a scenery modeler, I didn't know all the problems you met, and I'm
deeply sorry for being so ignorant.
As a FG user, I really support the
Basically I see two different approaches in FlightGear Scenery world
(aside from a few minor blends):
1.) Focus all ressources on one common World Scenery.
2.) Build pools of individual (and sometimes even contradicting)
scenarios - also known as the M$FS way.
It's obvious that 1.) was
flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote:
[...] I really wish we
could build some kind of temporary Scenery Team and discuss ideas.
My proposal is to meet at IRC on day the next weeks to start
organizing, or to open a temporary group or list. (Sorry, i do not
like the forum for such).
A scenery team
Am 24.02.12 21:44, schrieb Christian Schmitt:
flightg...@sablonier.ch wrote:
[...] I really wish we
could build some kind of temporary Scenery Team and discuss ideas.
My proposal is to meet at IRC on day the next weeks to start
organizing, or to open a temporary group or list. (Sorry, i do
Le 23/02/2012 23:21, Martin Spott a écrit :
when I
can spend all the time on so many other enjoyable activities.
Have fun,
Martin.
Martin, I quote only this one, as I do know what can be felt in such
circumstances, and you're right, the most important: save time to enjoy
life.
In the mid of the last decade I've been one of those who realized that
developing a long-term strategy for the various FlightGear Scenery
ressources would be a Really Good Idea. Meanwhile there's been
progress to make such a strategy happen, anyhow, as usual, the
groundwork doesn't have much of a
Am 24.02.2012 00:19, schrieb Pedro Morgan:
On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:21 PM, Martin Spott martin.sp...@mgras.net
mailto:martin.sp...@mgras.net wrote:
Apparently I've been too ambitious and idealistic. I know that
voluntary OpenSource development is primarily ego-driven, but
Am 23.02.12 23:21, schrieb Martin Spott:
Apparently I've been too ambitious and idealistic.
No !
Cheers, Yves
--
Virtualization Cloud Management Using Capacity Planning
Cloud computing makes use of virtualization
35 matches
Mail list logo
