Simon Pepping wrote:
That was basic work. The basis of the property subsystem is good,
and shorthands all work, I think. But it is another question which
properties are really implemented w.r.t. their effect on the layout. I
do not think we have a good overview. See Glen's experimental
approach:
Peter B. West wrote:
My understanding is that thanks to the property work earlier this year
by Glen, Finn and Simon, that properties are 95% there, including
shorthands. Admittely I didnt follow their work very closely, so could
be wrong about this. Im sure Glen will interject and correct me on
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Guys,
my comment on this is: Commit it if you think it's an improvement. It
may be a bit different if it concerned design questions, but with small
fixed and improvements I'd rather you guys just did it. If it turns
out to be a mistake it can easily be corrected. That's why
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28706.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29099.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Tibor Vyletel wrote:
Hi guys,
In previous versions (builds) of FOP areas have had set ID_AREA trait in
order to allow identification of original FONodes (and XML elements)
they had been created from. Why is this feature missing in recent builds
(1.0DEV)? Is there any other possibility how to
-Original Message-
From: Tibor Vyletel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
In previous versions (builds) of FOP areas have had set ID_AREA trait
in order to allow identification of original FONodes (and XML elements)
they had been created from.
Why is this feature missing in recent
Peter wrote:
Do you know of a web-accessible version of the paper, or summary of the
algorithm?
Unfortunately I don't.
In the bugzilla issue I'm going to try and summarize it.
Regards
Luca
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
FOP Devs,
I'm currently trying to get Markers working. The problem I have is that the
first marker on page 2 is actually being added to the markers on Page 1.
the markers are added to pageViewport in the BLM.addAreas method. Now my
understanding is that addAreas are called once the BPs have
-Original Message-
From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Chris,
snip /
the markers are added to pageViewport in the BLM.addAreas method. Now my
understanding is that addAreas are called once the BPs have been
processed and the areas are about to be rendered. So how is
Perhaps these links may be of help:
From the Java tutorials:
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/2d/textandfonts/index.html
http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/Media/2DText/
(Warning: very old, from 1998)
Forums for questions:
http://forum.java.sun.com/forum.jsp?forum=20
Glen
--- Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
However, I do understand the format itself pretty
well, so if you can
give me 'before' and after (or a diff would be fine,
I can commit the
necessary changes--committership has its
privileges... don't worry, I
won't touch JAVA code 'til I've spent
Peter B. West wrote:
Do you know of a web-accessible version of the paper, or summary of the
algorithm?
Try the TeX book, available as TeX-source from your nearest
CTAN server. The description is, umm, somewhat obscure, you
should get the commented TeX source (the .web files) as well.
-Original Message-
From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
snip /
Maybe sheds some light on the situation. As to what needs to be
done to fix it... no particular idea for the moment.
Just ran a few tests of my own, with FOP's examples/fo/markers/hide.fo, and
I could be
On May 20, 2004, at 1:13 PM, Glen Mazza wrote:
--- Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You can commit now? Congratulations--I guess that
means you got the CLA finished!
Yeah... Thanks! My company took about a month to sign FAX the
necessary Corporate CLA, and I couldn't FAX mine in 'til it was
26 matches
Mail list logo