Re: Incremental vs rewrite

2004-05-20 Thread Chris Bowditch
Simon Pepping wrote: That was basic work. The basis of the property subsystem is good, and shorthands all work, I think. But it is another question which properties are really implemented w.r.t. their effect on the layout. I do not think we have a good overview. See Glen's experimental approach:

Re: Incremental vs rewrite

2004-05-20 Thread Chris Bowditch
Peter B. West wrote: My understanding is that thanks to the property work earlier this year by Glen, Finn and Simon, that properties are 95% there, including shorthands. Admittely I didnt follow their work very closely, so could be wrong about this. Im sure Glen will interject and correct me on

Re: Just do it

2004-05-20 Thread Chris Bowditch
Jeremias Maerki wrote: Guys, my comment on this is: Commit it if you think it's an improvement. It may be a bit different if it concerned design questions, but with small fixed and improvements I'd rather you guys just did it. If it turns out to be a mistake it can easily be corrected. That's why

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 28706] - [PATCH] More justification problems

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28706. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29099] - pdf images does not appear in https

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29099. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Re: Trait.ID_AREA

2004-05-20 Thread Chris Bowditch
Tibor Vyletel wrote: Hi guys, In previous versions (builds) of FOP areas have had set ID_AREA trait in order to allow identification of original FONodes (and XML elements) they had been created from. Why is this feature missing in recent builds (1.0DEV)? Is there any other possibility how to

RE: Trait.ID_AREA

2004-05-20 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Tibor Vyletel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi, In previous versions (builds) of FOP areas have had set ID_AREA trait in order to allow identification of original FONodes (and XML elements) they had been created from. Why is this feature missing in recent

Re: Justification and line breaking

2004-05-20 Thread Luca Furini
Peter wrote: Do you know of a web-accessible version of the paper, or summary of the algorithm? Unfortunately I don't. In the bugzilla issue I'm going to try and summarize it. Regards Luca

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29124] New: - New line breaking algorithm

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29124] - New line breaking algorithm

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29124] - New line breaking algorithm

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29124] - New line breaking algorithm

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29124] - New line breaking algorithm

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29124] - New line breaking algorithm

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29124] - New line breaking algorithm

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29124] - New line breaking algorithm

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29124] - New line breaking algorithm

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29124] - New line breaking algorithm

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

DO NOT REPLY [Bug 29124] - New line breaking algorithm

2004-05-20 Thread bugzilla
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29124. ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.

Markers

2004-05-20 Thread Chris Bowditch
FOP Devs, I'm currently trying to get Markers working. The problem I have is that the first marker on page 2 is actually being added to the markers on Page 1. the markers are added to pageViewport in the BLM.addAreas method. Now my understanding is that addAreas are called once the BPs have

RE: Markers

2004-05-20 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Chris Bowditch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Hi Chris, snip / the markers are added to pageViewport in the BLM.addAreas method. Now my understanding is that addAreas are called once the BPs have been processed and the areas are about to be rendered. So how is

Re: Java text handling

2004-05-20 Thread Glen Mazza
Perhaps these links may be of help: From the Java tutorials: http://java.sun.com/docs/books/tutorial/2d/textandfonts/index.html http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/Media/2DText/ (Warning: very old, from 1998) Forums for questions: http://forum.java.sun.com/forum.jsp?forum=20 Glen

Re: Incremental vs rewrite

2004-05-20 Thread Glen Mazza
--- Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: However, I do understand the format itself pretty well, so if you can give me 'before' and after (or a diff would be fine, I can commit the necessary changes--committership has its privileges... don't worry, I won't touch JAVA code 'til I've spent

Re: Justification and line breaking

2004-05-20 Thread J.Pietschmann
Peter B. West wrote: Do you know of a web-accessible version of the paper, or summary of the algorithm? Try the TeX book, available as TeX-source from your nearest CTAN server. The description is, umm, somewhat obscure, you should get the commented TeX source (the .web files) as well.

RE: Markers

2004-05-20 Thread Andreas L. Delmelle
-Original Message- From: Andreas L. Delmelle [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] snip / Maybe sheds some light on the situation. As to what needs to be done to fix it... no particular idea for the moment. Just ran a few tests of my own, with FOP's examples/fo/markers/hide.fo, and I could be

Re: Incremental vs rewrite

2004-05-20 Thread Clay Leeds
On May 20, 2004, at 1:13 PM, Glen Mazza wrote: --- Clay Leeds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: You can commit now? Congratulations--I guess that means you got the CLA finished! Yeah... Thanks! My company took about a month to sign FAX the necessary Corporate CLA, and I couldn't FAX mine in 'til it was