Simon Pepping schrieb:
> INFRA-2886 has been done by infra.
>
> Simon
>
> On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 08:41:56PM +0200, Simon Pepping wrote:
>> I registered two JIRA issues:
>>
>> INFRA-2868: Add new version number for XMLGraphicsCommons project in
>> Bugzilla: version 1.4
>>
>> INFRA-2886: Add new v
Simon Pepping schrieb:
The release files for fop 1.0 are now ready for review and the release
vote.
A bit late but anyways +1
Well done guys!
Christian
--- Begin Message ---
Dear PMCs,
Please could you forward the below message to your user@ and dev@ mailing
lists, thanks in advance.
-
The Travel Assistance Committee is taking in applications for those wanting
to attend ApacheCon US 2008 between the 3rd and 7th November 2008 in New
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
Christian, would you please add version 0.95 to Bugzilla?
Done.
Christian
Vincent Hennebert schrieb:
While checking the website for the 0.95 release I stumbled upon this
“Areas of Expertise” table on the team.html page, and realised that some
inactive committers are still listed while some active committers
aren’t. I guess those inactive committers won’t mind if we rep
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
Hmm, I hope it's the last time now. Every time there's a different
reason for the failure. Anyway, I think I've found the necessary change:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=648971
I just tried a successful build with trunk (Revision: 649002) ;-)
--
Christ
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
As announced three days ago, I'd like to call for a vote to merge the
processing feedback branch [1] into Trunk. This will add the new
per-processing-run event subsystem to FOP that has been described on:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/ProcessingFeedback
[1]
htt
Parker, Les schrieb:
> To whom it may concern.
>
> If I you dont take me off this list immediately I will take legal action.
>
> 2nd notoice.
Instead of spending your energy with threatening with legal action (that
doesn't impress us at all) you should have a look at
http://xmlgraphics.apache.
Vincent Hennebert schrieb:
> I’ve sent announcements to all the mailing lists listed on the release
> page [1], excepted the XSL-FO yahoo group where I’m waiting for
> subscribe authorization. There’s http://www.w3.org/Style/XSL/ and
> Freshmeat left. I didn’t find out how to post a news on the for
Andrejus Chaliapinas schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> I've made checkout of fop 0.94 branch and while running examples target from
> build, get this:
>
>
>
> [fop] D:\eclipse\test\fop-0_94\examples\fo\basic\images.fo ->
> D:\eclipse\test\fop-0_94\build\examples\images.pdf
>
> [fop] [ERROR] Abst
Vincent Hennebert schrieb:
Hi Christian,
Christian Geisert a écrit :
Vincent Hennebert schrieb:
[..]
I don’t think we can wait any longer before releasing. So I’ll prepare
Why?
1. because we’ve been talking about that 0.94 release for more than
a month now, and it’s about time to
Adrian Cumiskey schrieb:
Guys,
Please review/try out the patch I just submitted
(http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43156) and let me
know if it fixes the MethodNotFoundError(s) on your ant junit target on
the fop-0_94 branch when using jdk1.3.
Yes, the junit target executes
Vincent Hennebert schrieb:
[..]
> I don’t think we can wait any longer before releasing. So I’ll prepare
Why?
> the artifacts and launch the vote in 24 hours. If you have the time to
> look at this by tomorrow that’s great and we’ll see what comes out of
> your investigation; otherwise, well, I
Adrian Cumiskey schrieb:
> Hi Vincent,
>
> Just to confirm with you, I experienced *exactly* the same nonsensical
> NoSuchMethodError(s) when running the junit tests. Its a strange one...
Same here ... indeed very strange. One thing I noticed is that the
"missing" methods are all in inner classe
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Author: vhennebert
> Date: Wed Feb 14 01:32:03 2007
> New Revision: 507449
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=507449
> Log:
> I thought the svn:eol-style and svn:keywords properties were automatically
> set on java and fo files.
It depends on your cli
Jay Bryant schrieb:
> I tried to ask a question and got a returned mail notice (reason: 552
> Message rejected as it is spam (body))
>
> So how do I attach code and ask a question about it?
Maybe send it inline instead as a attachement?
I guess the simplest thing would be to publish it on website
Vincent Hennebert schrieb:
[..]
> In addition, what about removing the fop and batik directories from
> /www/www.apache.org/dist/xml on minotaur? Obviously those directories
> are obsolete now. Or should they be kept for historical purpose?
I've removed /www/www.apache.org/dist/xml/fop (rather m
Vincent Hennebert schrieb:
> Jeremias Maerki a écrit :
>
>>Website redeployed. I guess I need to switch back to SVN deployment so
>>everyone can do it. Will do ASAP.
>
> But how is it done currently? When I change a file in the xdocs
> directory of the trunk, it eventually appears on the website.
Vincent Hennebert schrieb:
> I can handle the docbook-apps list.
>
> BTW, my annoucement for XMLGraphics Commons 1.1 never appeared on the
> Batik-users list. It did on Fop-users, although my Apache address isn't
> subscribed to this list. Any idea of what's wrong?
The moderator(s) of batik-users
Simon Pepping schrieb:
Add bugzilla entry for the new release id: How do I do that?
Ask someone who has admin rights for bugzilla ;-)
(I think I'm the only one within the XML Graphics Project, another way
would be to create an issue at https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA)
I've added ve
Simon Pepping schrieb:
According to the documentation page fop may be run as:
"java -jar build/fop.jar".
In our own bin packages that does not work, because the manifest file
lists the libraries without a path. Does that have a special reason?
I think it would be better to change it to ../lib/x
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> On 13.11.2006 22:24:27 J.Pietschmann wrote:
>
>>Jeremias Maerki wrote:
>>
>>>If nobody objects I'm going to remove the deprecated elements in the
>>>apps package later this week.
>>
>>Umm, couldn't this wait until after the 0.93 release? Well, that's
>>a question, not a
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
List moderator performance for fop-users was poor this week. I have not
been able to do anything from Wednesday to Friday and nobody else
handled the moderations requests. Is this just a glitch (holiday
absences etc.) or do we need additional moderators?
Well tuesday wa
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> Subject says it all. I think it's time. They work pretty well and have
> grown beyond sandbox state. I'm sure there maybe a few nits here and
> there, but the same applies to the other renderers.
+1
I've only tested the PCL renderer a bit but I'm sure the AFP renderer i
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> I've been approached by Arje Cahn during ApacheCon. He invited me to the
> yearly Cocoon GetTogether which (I think) will be in the week before
> ApacheCon US in November. I assume this will be in Amsterdam again. I'm
> thinking about going and maybe talking about FOP. T
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> I think the AFP and PCL renderers are now pretty much ready to be
> promoted from the sandbox. Are there any people on this list who have
> tried those renderers so they could give some feedback?
I tried the PCL renderer with a few documents on a Brother HL1270N and
thos
Vincent Hennebert schrieb:
> Same for me! We will perhaps have to clone Jeremias.
Wohoo! That's really great news (for both of you and for FOP)
Christian
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> Christian,
>
> would you please add the "0.92" version to Buzilla? Thanks.
Done.
Christian
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> Andreas, when you set up the announcement, please include a point that
> we're requesting feedback on the finalized API. Just in case we have
And make clear that it is the final 0.92 release which is in beta status ;-)
> overlooked anything when designing it so we can
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
We originally wanted to do a release much earlier but I was always in
the middle of something and I think I'm simply the only one who can
allocate enough time to do an actual release (prove me wrong, please). I
I might have some time on the next weekend.
(So let's make
Ben Litchfield schrieb:
> Hello all,
Hi Ben,
> I am the main developer of PDFBox, an open source(BSD) PDF library.
How many other developers are working on PDFBox?
[..]
> I propose that classes in FOP's package be 'merged' into the PDFBox
> library and FOP utilize PDFBox for PDF functionality
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> Not necessarily. We've called it 0.90alpha1. I'd assume we'd have a
> 0.90beta or directly a 0.90 (final) first. But I guess that's open for
I thought we do it like 0.91alpha2, ... 0.93 beta ... 1.0
> discussion. I don't care too much about it.
What do others think?
C
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Going back to SVN Trunk mode.
[..]
> -
> +
Shouldn't this become 0.91svn?
--
Christian
Simon Pepping schrieb:
OK, except that I could not verify your signature:
Yes, I screwed it up - fixed now.
Thanks for checking
Christian
Hi,
as you've probably noticed I've tagged the 0.90alpha1 release.
It would be nice if someone else could have a look at the builds
(available at http://people.apache.org/~chrisg/fop-0.90alpha1-test/)
for a quick test.
If no showstoppers are reported within the next hours I'll move this to
the d
Hi,
should we add 0.90 as a new version for FOP into bugzilla or should bugs
for 0.90 reported against 1.0dev?
--
Christian
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> On 20.11.2005 11:21:55 Christian Geisert wrote:
[..]
> Yes. I think they are necessary. To reduce the size of the 1.4 binary
> distribution we could think about removing the XML-related JARs. But IMO
> they don't hurt.
>
> What I don'
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
Ok, fixed, along with a few other things. Interesting how many little
things you can find that delay a release. :-)
With the current build in the branch we are able to create the 3
distributions that I see are necessary:
- Source distribution
- Binary distribution for JD
Christian Geisert schrieb:
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
Same here. Christian, can you give us some details about your
environment? JDK version, OS, Ant Version...
I just tried it with a fresh checkout and it worked.
Sorry for the noise.
For the archives: Looks like this was an issue with the
Simon Pepping schrieb:
I had a look at some other Apache projects:
cocoon: latest
excalibur: current
jakarta-struts: current
lucene: current
jakarta-regexp: current
james: current
logging/log4j: latest=1.2.12, unstable=1.3alpha7
rive
Hi,
I just created the Branch 'fop-0_90' for the release.
So you can go on hacking on the trunk ...
--
Christian
Manuel Mall schrieb:
> Ooops, that wasn't very efficient as I did more or less the same thing.
Yes, that was unfortunate. I was really wondering seeing Jörg as
committer after you announced it on the mailing list.
> Oh well you got in first.
>
> Here is my disabled-testcases.xml - may be you ca
Peter S. Housel schrieb:
[..]
> Speaking as a kibitzing non-committer...
>
> Branching in subversion is easy, and very cheap. It would make sense to
> branch 0.90 from trunk now, and allow development on trunk to continue
> freely. (Alternatively, you could freeze trunk and do the development
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> On 15.11.2005 10:50:07 Christian Geisert wrote:
[..]
>>I don't think we need to vote on alpha/preview release (preview release
>>as in "will be available on cvs.apache.org/builds/fop and not on the
>>official www.apache.org/dist&
Chris Bowditch schrieb:
> Jeremias Maerki wrote:
[..]
>> - Create a copy of the xdocs/trunk directory to xdocs/0.90alpha1.
>
> Sorry to be picky, but the word "alpha" gives the impression that the
> release is alpha quality. I'd say it was beta quality by now. Anyway, I
> thought in the past we
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> I agree with you two. Therefore, I've resurrected status.xml, added it
> to our website again and prepared it so we can start using it after the
> release.
>
> BTW, I think I'm through with all the things I wanted to do. What's left
> now:
> - write the README/release no
Manuel Mall schrieb:
[..]
>>IMHO there should be a changes document (as part of the
>>distribution), at least starting after the 1.0 release.
>
> Yes there should - but for now: Just remove CHANGES and update README?
I'd say yes.
--
Christian
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> Same here. Christian, can you give us some details about your
> environment? JDK version, OS, Ant Version...
I just tried it with a fresh checkout and it worked.
Sorry for the noise.
Christian
Just got this:
[junit] - ---
[junit] Testcase:
list-block_keep-with-next.xml(org.apache.fop.layoutengine.LayoutEngineTestSuite$1):
Caused an ERROR
[junit] Invalid child node for 'element-list': null at position 0
(element-list category=brea
Manuel Mall schrieb:
[..]
>>No hurry, I just meant to prepare everything (still problems with
>>forrest) - and Manuel is already doing a lot of the work - the actual
>>release isn't that much work and can be done later ...
>
> Sorry, didn't intend to steal your work Christian.
Heh, I like it w
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
Cool, thanks! Let's hope I can squeeze everything in until then.
No hurry, I just meant to prepare everything (still problems with
forrest) - and Manuel is already doing a lot of the work - the actual
release isn't that much work and can be done later ...
Christian
Hi,
Seems Manuel just had the same thought ...
The docs dir contains old stuff that isn't needed anymore (maybe except
xml2pdf.xsl which could be moved to a new examples/xslt dir)
So, has anybody objections if I remove the docs dir?
Christian
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
[..]
> Christian, are you available for managing the actual release (build plus
> deployment)?
Yes, should have some time on the weekend.
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> Author: manuel
> Date: Tue Nov 8 01:42:43 2005
> New Revision: 331757
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=331757&view=rev
> Log:
> Another character encoding update
>
> Modified:
> xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/src/java/org/apache/fop/render/rtf/RTFHandler.java
[
Manuel Mall schrieb:
> While looking at building the fop distribution I noticed that the Ant
> project has switched (don't know when) from having ant.sh (for *nixes)
> and ant.bat (for Win) to ant (for *nixes) and ant.bat. This means the
> command to invoke the program is the same on Unix and Wi
Manuel Mall schrieb:
> I just committed a fairly sizeable patch related to all the work on
> inline objects done over the last weeks.
Great that you are finally able to commit .. welcome!
> While I hope it hasn't broken anything, given its size and my
> inexperience with the overall FOP softwa
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> If you don't see any replies from me at the moment, this is because it
> looks like a router in San Francisco is blocking my IP traffic to the
> Apache servers located in the US. That means I've got no SVN access and
> it also seems to affect the mails from the mailing li
Luca Furini schrieb:
>> Added docs building with forrest
>> (needs Ant 1.6 and you need to run forrest once manually
>> as there's a bug with the plugin download)
>>
>>
>> Modified:
>>xmlgraphics/fop/trunk/build.xml
>
> Shouldn't the documentation target be an optional one, so as to let the
>
J.Pietschmann schrieb:
> Hi devs,
> I just upgraded to Ant 1.6.5 and the junit tasks stopped
> working (see Ant FAQ faq.html#delegating-classloader). I
> really liked my setup where all jars were in a single
> directory. :-(
Yeah, with the help of those nice build.bat|sh ;-)
> It's too late in th
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> Manuel Mall has been investing a tremendous amount of time and effort
> into making FOP better lately. The results were just great. It's been a
> pleasure to apply his patches, even though it ate up a lot of my time.
> ;-) Manuel has been around since at least late 2002,
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> On 01.09.2005 16:46:17 Christian Geisert wrote:
[..]
>>As we already have a 'pdf renderer' and 'awt renderer' component, is the
>>new 'renderers' component meant for 'General Renderer issues'?
>>Should w
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
> To use the wonders of Bugzilla, you can use the following:
>
> E-mail address: fop-dev@xmlgraphics.apache.org
>Password: M0YtXE2FTn
Oops, password changed ..
--
Christian
Christian Geisert schrieb:
> Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
>
>>http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-537
>
> Uh, no need to bother infrastructure. As I have some admin rights for
> bugzilla I'll have a look at it later today.
Ok, I've added 1.6 to the Batik versi
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/INFRA-537
Uh, no need to bother infrastructure. As I have some admin rights for
bugzilla I'll have a look at it later today.
(Just tried to assign this issue to myself but it seems I don't have
permission)
--
Christian
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> Very weird. Look here:
> http://xml.apache.org/fop
>
> GET /fop HTTP/1.1
> Host: xml.apache.org
> User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.7.10)
> Gecko/20050716 Firefox/1.0.6
> [..]
>
> HTTP/1.x 301 Moved Permanently
> Date: Thu, 25 Aug 2005 06
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
I've changed the .htaccess file to "RedirectPermanent" as you suggested.
It's quite interesting. First, I thought all the pages have to be
removed in order for the redirect to work, but it seems that all the
No, you don't need to remove anything (but this should be don
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> FYI, I've added a .htaccess file with the following content to the
> /www/xml.apache.org/fop/ directory:
>
> Redirect /fop/ http://xmlgraphics.apache.org/fop/
>
> I hope this is correct. In case the old website acts up you can still
Looks correct, but it doesn't work y
Chris Bowditch schrieb:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Christian: It appears we both went for this one at the same time! Its
> now been applied :-) Sorry for any confusion.
No problem, noticed it just before committing (need now to find out how
to take back a svn add ;-)
Will you commit the other
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
[..]
> I think that's a feature that has been asked for many times. It would be
> totally easy to allow a background on the simple-page-master. Again, we
> can let it fail with strict validation and issue a warning about the
> non-standard feature when strict validation i
J.Pietschmann schrieb:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
I don't know of any such convention. I've seen various variants: rc,
beta, previews etc. I think we're free to choose.
I'd rather go for "alpha". "rc" means "release candidate", meaning
Yes 0.90-alpha sounds like version number
Christian
J.Pietschmann schrieb:
Apache Wiki wrote:
The following page has been changed by JeremiasMaerki:
http://wiki.apache.org/xmlgraphics-fop/FOPAvalonization
Great! I get a Python/MoinMoin error when trying to view the RSS
feed entry. I'm not quite up to date here: should this be reported
to the A
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> On 24.06.2005 10:50:20 richardw wrote:
[..]
>>svn: REPORT request failed on '/repos/asf/!svn/vcc/default'
>>svn: REPORT of '/repos/asf/!svn/vcc/default': 400 Bad Request
>>(http://svn.apache.org)
>
> Seems to be a message from the server. Since it worked for me just n
Web Maestro Clay schrieb:
> I forget how we last updated the HEADER & FOOTER info for the download
> system. I've updated the files I attached to this issue:
>
> http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22627
>
> Anyone remember how to apply this change?
Just copy the files to /www/www.
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
> On 07.06.2005 16:45:42 Williams, Greg - ETA wrote:
>
>>I am looking to download version 0.19.0 of FOP. I am toad that this version
>>works with Oracle version 9.2.0.6.
>
>
> Look here:
> http://archive.apache.org/dist/xml/fop/source/old/
Uh, this is still on my todo l
Chris Bowditch schrieb:
Jeremias Maerki wrote:
Oh ... I see. Well thanks for looking into the MARC problem. Doesnt
anyone @infrastructure have a contact there we can speak to directly?
I don't think so.
Last time I contacted them directly via mail and they did set up the
fop-user archive within ho
Jeremias Maerki schrieb:
As announced on the XML Graphics General mailing list I'd like to call
for a vote on the migration of both Batik and FOP to Subversion.
+1
Christian
76 matches
Mail list logo
