Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-14 Thread Manuel Mall
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 03:12 pm, Finn Bock wrote: > >> > >> > >> some 10pt text > >> > >> some 12pt text > >> > >> more 10pt text > >> > >> > >> > >>All the inline areas also have a line-height trait of 12000 but > >> that is only used when lls="line-height" [4.6]. > > [M

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-14 Thread Finn Bock
some 10pt text some 12pt text more 10pt text All the inline areas also have a line-height trait of 12000 but that is only used when lls="line-height" [4.6]. [Manuel] Hmm, the line-height property would be "normal" everywhere which equates to "1.2" that means th

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-13 Thread Manuel Mall
On Wed, 14 Sep 2005 01:33 am, Finn Bock wrote: > [Manuel] > > > Any way, back to the topic at hand. Lets assume the following fo: > > > > some 10pt text > font-size="12pt">some 12 pt textmore 10pt > > text > > > > In this case the line-height everywhere is normal which is > > equivalent to 1.2em. T

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-13 Thread Finn Bock
[Manuel] Any way, back to the topic at hand. Lets assume the following fo: some 10pt textfont-size="12pt">some 12 pt textmore 10pt text In this case the line-height everywhere is normal which is equivalent to 1.2em. The innermost fo:inline will return an area with a bpd of 12pt. However, t

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-13 Thread Manuel Mall
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 06:56 pm, Finn Bock wrote: > Manuel Mall wrote: > > On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:12 pm, Finn Bock wrote: > >>[Manuel] > >> > >>>Inline areas have their own line-height trait which can be > >>>different to the line-height on the containing line area / > >>>containing block. line-height

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-13 Thread Finn Bock
Manuel Mall wrote: On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:12 pm, Finn Bock wrote: [Manuel] Inline areas have their own line-height trait which can be different to the line-height on the containing line area / containing block. line-height when specified on an inline fo has a different meaning, i.e. the inl

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-13 Thread Manuel Mall
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 04:12 pm, Finn Bock wrote: > [Manuel] > > > Inline areas have their own line-height trait which can be > > different to the line-height on the containing line area / > > containing block. line-height when specified on an inline fo has a > > different meaning, i.e. the inline are

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-13 Thread Finn Bock
[Manuel] Inline areas have their own line-height trait which can be different to the line-height on the containing line area / containing block. line-height when specified on an inline fo has a different meaning, i.e. the inline area returned MUST have the exact line-height as specified, whil

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-12 Thread Manuel Mall
On Tue, 13 Sep 2005 01:26 am, Finn Bock wrote: > > Manuel Mall wrote: > >> yes, that is an option. What I am unsure about here is that the > >> children, typically text areas, do not take the line spacing into > >> account when reporting their bpd, that is the usually 10% space > >> above and below

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-12 Thread Finn Bock
Manuel Mall wrote: yes, that is an option. What I am unsure about here is that the children, typically text areas, do not take the line spacing into account when reporting their bpd, that is the usually 10% space above and below the character. So what is the correct bpd for an fo:inline which

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-12 Thread Manuel Mall
On Mon, 12 Sep 2005 07:52 pm, Luca Furini wrote: > Manuel Mall wrote: > > yes, that is an option. What I am unsure about here is that the > > children, typically text areas, do not take the line spacing into > > account when reporting their bpd, that is the usually 10% space > > above and below the

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-12 Thread Luca Furini
Manuel Mall wrote: yes, that is an option. What I am unsure about here is that the children, typically text areas, do not take the line spacing into account when reporting their bpd, that is the usually 10% space above and below the character. So what is the correct bpd for an fo:inline which

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-12 Thread Manuel Mall
Luca, yes, that is an option. What I am unsure about here is that the children, typically text areas, do not take the line spacing into account when reporting their bpd, that is the usually 10% space above and below the character. So what is the correct bpd for an fo:inline which has text area

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-12 Thread Luca Furini
Some days ago, Manuel Mall wrote: The problem is that the Inline LM doesn't calculate the dimension of the area it is suppose to construct from the subsequence given to it by the Line LM. Instead it just assumes the dimension of the line as given to it in the LayoutContext. However, to be ab

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-06 Thread Manuel Mall
On Tue, 6 Sep 2005 04:02 pm, Jeremias Maerki wrote: > Rather complex area, line building. One that is a little > under-present in our testcases so far. I believe you're correct > (comments in 4.6 and 7.15.4), but I have the impression that we'd > actually need to look at this from a more general an

Re: fo:inline bpd

2005-09-06 Thread Jeremias Maerki
Rather complex area, line building. One that is a little under-present in our testcases so far. I believe you're correct (comments in 4.6 and 7.15.4), but I have the impression that we'd actually need to look at this from a more general angle eventually. Not necessarily right now, of course. But it

fo:inline bpd

2005-09-05 Thread Manuel Mall
Currently fop sets the bpd of areas created from fo:inlines to to line-height of the line the area appears in. For example: Some text smaller text The inline parent area created for the fo:inline will be given a bpd of 12pt, i.e. the line-height of the surrounding block, and not 9.6pt which